Authorization in VKM1 for users based on credit limit?

hi all,
Does anybody heard about authorization for users in VKM1 to release blocked commercial documents? In my project, they want to set ranges for users :
Analyst 40%
Manager 100%
Director 100%
I looked for all SAP doc and i think its not possible, any thoughts?
Thanks and regards

Dear Monica,
You can do this with Roles & Profile (Authorizations).
Go to T-Code PFCG - Either enter the roles that currently exists or create a new role. Insert T-code VKM1in Menu tab page & then go to Authorizations tab
Expand the Thread Standard - Sales & Distribution,
Once again expand the thread Standard - Credit Doc. Value Class: Processing of SD Documents
Then expand the sub-thread - Credit Doc. Value Class: Processing of SD Documents
Here There is a option Document value class (credit management) - Here you can enter the Document Value that user is Authorized to release the block...
You might have to take help og your Basis person to create Roles & do the above...
Hope this helps...
Give points if Useful...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta
Edited by: Jignesh Mehta on Aug 30, 2008 12:43 PM

Similar Messages

SAP Hardware sizing for "User-Based sizing".

Short Text
User-based Hardware Sizing
Long Text
Dear SAP Support,
We would like to know the SAP Hardware sizing for "User-Based sizing".
Our queries is
1. In "User-Based sizing", What we have to consider,
the number of users are calculated in the basis of
Concurrent users in the system in a given point of time
or
total number of users logged into the systems in the whole day?
We have referred the SAP document "Sizing SAP System" and the above
point are not clearly mentioned.
Regards,

As the document says there are number of possible definitions for "users" in SAP context...
For understanding assume that no of users logged to the system they consume different resources / areas in the system, some login to the system whole day but they don't work whole day, some user open multiple session to work while other open multiple session but they don't exactly work on it which means (every new session consume memory/resources) like you said their are concurrent users wherein they work and consume resources (SAP WPs)
So before finalizing the sizing first compare the both reports (user based, thorhgput) and read the advantages and disadvantages for both. You can also consult with SAP / Account Manager to help you
as per SAP document there's no point in counting no of pc's, laptops to calculate no of users
Also refer:
http://www.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/index.epx

Credit management - one customer for two company, different credit limit

hi,
customer A in company 1000 and 2000. for example the total credit limit is $10000 for these two companies, customer A with individual limit 6000 in company 1000 and 4000 in company 2000. If i create sales order 1 with value is $7000, then message will be displayed. however if i create sales order 2 with value $35000 , no message is dispalyed. Is it possible to display message is the total credit limit is over but not individual limit?
And if i create a new customer , and create a sales order with over credit limit and the message is displayed when I save the sales order, but the value is not upated in credit master before i release Sales order. it only happen for the first time i create customer. pls advice
thanks

Hello Jo Jo,
it is not possible to check the sales order created in one company against the total
credit limit for the customer . The system checks (in standard) always against the
credit limit maintained for assigned company. The only one way could be to develop your own credit check (OVA8 - userexit 1, 2 or 3).
The part with the credit blocked sales order is correct: if the sales order is credit blocked, it does not update the open credit values, as the credit value will be calculated according the confirmed quantities and the confirmed quantities will be removed in the sales order (in standard) due the credit block. When you release the order in VKM1 or VKM3, the ATP runs and creates the confirmed quantities - as the result the order updates the credit values in FD32.
I hope this information helps you.
Best regards,
Lela

HI,how to find roles for user based on userid?

hi,
i need to find roles for each user based on user id.
can i know any one knows this how to get roles for user?
thanks,
jpullareddy

hi,
i solve my self.
i am getting values
jpullareddy

Credit Check not occurring for Customer with Partial Credit limit existing

Hi,
I have a scenario
1) where, if credit limit is crossed, then on creation of order I get an credit check even when i have not entered materials in sales order.
2) Partial Credit limit is pending (for e.g Credit limit of 100, 50 is still pending) when i create a new order with unconfirmed quantity, for amount 100, there is no credit check happening. (system should give message for extra amount 50)
Can I please get guidance on this issue.(2nd point)
Thanks & Regards,
Ganesh.

HI Ganesh,
Your issue is not clear. What do you mean by
2) Partial Credit limit is pending (for e.g Credit limit of 100, 50 is still pending) when i create a new order with unconfirmed quantity, for amount 100, there is no credit check happening. (system should give message for extra amount 50)
Please explain clearly
Thanks
Jobi

Cst sales - blocking amount for c form in credit limit

sir
We are from India. When we sell goods for a customer in another state we give the customer Central Sales Tax invoice which is 2% of the basic value. The customer has to give the company 'C' forms, which will be given with in 3 months after invoice. If he does not give, the company will be loss by 3% of the basic value. So my company wants us to block the 3% of the basic value in credit limit (in cumulative basis till the customer gives C form). Once we receive the 'c' form the blocked amount will be released.
Kindly suggest us a solution.
regards
padma

Hi
I hope you know how credit management works. As per standard credit management How can we block some percentage of invoice? I don't think so this is a good idea.
You are saying that company would lose 3% if customer doesn't return C form. How would company lose 3%?
Why don't you charge this 3% to customer and on return of C form you give credit note to customer. If he returns he'll be getting 3% off and if he doesn't return then company will lose 3% which it already had charged to customer. So company won't be losing anything.
I dont know about legal or operational possibility of this in India. This is just an idea.
Thank$

Removing authorization in mass for users

HI All
Please let me know is there is any option to know what material movement type authorization is given to end users and to remove the movement type authorization for them in mass. please help me in this as the users are provided with movement type like 311 which is effecting my costing.
Regards
Srinivasa Reddy.B

I am a basis consultant and fico consultant I require a way to remove the authorization through mass changes .
regards
Srinivasa reddy.B

Mass Add authorizations using RSECADMIN for user tab

Hi All,
I sent the following to ask SAP if there is a way to do this and they told me they could not help unless I wanted to pay the consulting fees so I am now curious if they have a way to do this. I have reviewed the help documents and OSS notes and could not find anything . They pro-offered adding the authorization S_RS_AUTH to the role but I do not want to do that. I want to do it by user instead of creating many multiple roles. Below is the question. Does anyone know how to do a mass add to authorizations to users using RSECADMIN.
We want to be able to add multiple users to an authorization created
through RSECADMIN rather than add them one by one to each user. Is
there a mass user add with RSECADMIN. I looked and cannot find this
feature. Thanks, Mary

Hi,
There are two different methods of assigning authorisations.
Direct
1. From the RSECADMIN transaction select 'Users', enter the name and select 'Change'. Use the value help to selct the authorisation in question and for a single value select 'Insert'. If you select the 'Nodes' option it is possible to select nodes of hierarchies on characteristic 0TCATUTH (a single H; not to be confused with 0TCAUTHH!). This char offers automatically all BI authorizations as virtual master data. These master data can be organized in hierarchies, a property that offers the possibility to group authorizations by meaning or application field. Press "Save" to save the assignment to database.
Assignment via Roles and Profiles
2. It is also possible to assign using roles or more specifically, profiles of roles. Use PFCG and instead of entering manually created object use S_RS_AUTH which gives you the BI Auth field to enter the appropriate authorisations.
Hope this helps

User exit for merging the credit limit in different credit control area.

Dear All,
Please provide user exit for the merging the credit limit in different credit control area as well as logic for the same.
I have to merge the overall credit limit of the customer for some divisions. At this time in one company code we have created 9 credit control area as per product line. While creating customer master data and Credit management (FD32) user has assigned the different limit with respective to credit control area e. g Customeru2019s total limit assigned is 10 laks. For credit control 1100 Limit is Rs. 3 laks and for credit control area 2200 limit is 7 laks. Now the user wants to merge the credit limit for only above two credit control area. The sales orders should get created in any credit control area up to 10 laks.
Regards,
Suresh

Dear Damodhar/All,
Would you please explain me prerequisite setting from functional side for these user exit?
I want complete functional setting prior to ABAP application so that it work properly post configuration.
Regards,
Suresh

Authorizations for users to change their own data

Hi
All the employees are given the userids to logon to sap when these employees log on to sap with the particular userids they should be able to change /Display only the details pertaining to them not others
We have not implemented ESS but this is in pipeline but only after 3 -4 months But Authorizations are required for users now only
How to design role which should apply to all user requirements and they should get their Personnel no by default
Kind Regards
Vinod

Hi,
   For your requirement goto transaction SU21 and select the object P_PERNR and click DOCUMENTATION. Refer the Documentation for the steps to be followed.
(i.e) For a user to be able to maitain his or her own data. You should assign the user an authorization for the HR: Master data - Personnel number check object (P_PERNR), with the following specificatons:
1. Authorization level: *
2. Interpretation of assignment
   User - personnel no: I
3. Infotype           : 0002
4. Subtype            : *
A related link http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=502235&sid=cd1bde22eb24059e4d5a2eae086b7c96

User exit at credit check

Hi all,
I am looking out for user exits at credit check t-code VKM3
For customized order type, delivery gets created automatically after we save the order (as Immediate delivery (X) is present in the sales doc type in delivery section)
But this order should not save if there is a credit check or if there is a stock deficit.
How can i check availabilty as well as credit check simultaneously.
If stock is not available then this order should not get saved.
If credit check is active, order should not get saved.
Client wants deliveries to get created the moment we release order from credit check in VKM3
Please advice
Sunil

Hello Sunil,
You do not need a USEREXT for this. For the relevant document type, to to VOV8 and in the shipping tab, there is a filed delivery block, in this you can select credit check. Whenever the user creates a so with this doc type, based on the credit check, system will block the doc for delivery and the same can be released via VKM3.
Let me know if this was useful.
Regards,
Sanjay

Effect on SD Credit Limit when extension of Due Date for Certain Invoices

Dear SD Members,
Brief Description
Extension of Due Date for Certain Invoices
Due Date extension to be made for certain invoices posted in FI
Requirement
After Billing is done and invoice is posted in FI management may decide to postpone due date for certain for any particular invoice for a specific customer.
The payment term will be changed in the invoice and due date should change. But for this no SD credit limit should be affected. The change can only be made by specific user with authorization. The bank also will be intimated with details from SAP.
What I want to know will there be any effect on SD Credit Management part, when from FI side invoices payment terms due date will be extended. Please share your view & suggestions on this.
Regards
Subrat

There will be no affect on the credit mgmt..... the credit screen captures the total open AR... it does not consider Aging in AR.... all the values even if not due r calucalted in the open AR purpose for Credit....

Static credit check: credit limit exceeded for consignment issue delivery

Hi,
We are encountering a credit limit exceeded error in delivery creation for a consignment issue.
In SPRO config "Credit limit check for order types", no credit limit check is assigned to the order type. However, there is one assigned for the delivery type. Also, for CCAr/Risk cat./CG combination in OVA8 (Auto Credit Block Delivery), static credit check has been activated with error message reaction. Open orders and open deliveries were also activated. Customer exceeded credit exposure but user cannot release the order in any VKMx transactions as no credit limit check is assigned to the order type.
Given that this is the current setup, and the following conditions:
1. Credit limit for the customer cannot be increased
2. Oldest open item cannot be cleared just yet
Is there any way that we can proceed with delivery creation for this customer? The other order types have credit limit check so credit management team was able to release them. However, we are unsure on how to proceed with this consignment order. Kindly advise and thank you in advance for your help.

We are encountering a credit limit exceeded error in delivery creation for a consignment issue.
but user cannot release the order in any VKMx transactions as no credit limit check is assigned to the order type.
Looks contradictory and it may need to run report RVKRED77 to reorganization of open credit values. Try to run the report in test system and then run in production system. After running the report, the use must be able to release in VKM* transaction.
Regards,

How to create a disconnected license using User-based license in the Volume License Manager

Using VLM 2.0, how do you create a disconnected license for users who are set up for User-based license?

Hi Jordan:
Please see the following knowledge base entries that should help you out.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/7AE8E22CB83D604286257088006D452A?OpenDocument
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/28CACF3A4F81FB5C86256F5D0081D046?OpenDocument
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/B12A9ED8FC06A9B286256E6A00671018?OpenDocument
Thanks
Nandini
NI

App is user-based rather than computer-based?

One thing I am really concerned about (and I really hope I am wrong) is that FCPX and Motion seem to be user based now rather than computer based. The structure for effects and such which I am concerned will affect how multiple accounts on the same machine will access the same features.
Has anyone played with this or noticed any change in the directory structure and placement of plugins, effects, generators etc. from the main librbary/application support/ that would affect this? Have some things been moved to the app package instead?
Moving forward I just want to know that when I have effects, plugins, generators, etc. that they are accessible to everyone on the computer. Perhaps I have a funky install and need to reinstall.
Tell me I am wrong! Please.

Thanks Tom. I thought and was hoping I was wrong. The few I have installed were setup for user-based installation except for FXFactory. Just wanted to be certain. I thought that would have been a change almost as bad as dropping FCS for sale the day of the FCP X release.

Authorization in VKM1 for users based on credit limit?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for