Authorization Issue with AR01 while executing through a Variant

HI Experts,
I have a user who is trying to execute AR01 with a variant created by user. when user tried to execute it gave a message No Data maintained.
I tried the same with a test user giving SAP_ALL, i got the required data. so I ran a trace on the end user, there was nothing which i need to do because all I got on Trace is RC=0 i tried the same with the test user (with SAP_ALL) it also gave the same Trace log.
but why is it failing for the end use?
any help is highly appreciated
Thank you in Advance.

Hi,
check Note 141876 - Authorization checks in asset reporting. It explains why you can't see any authororization failures in trace.
Cheers

Similar Messages

Issue with LCM while migrating planning application in the cluster Env.

Hi,
Having issues with LCM while migrating the planning application in the cluster Env. In LCM we get below error and the application is up and running. Please let me know if anyone else has faced the same issue before in cluster environment. We have done migration using LCM on the single server and it works fine. It just that the cluster environment is an issue.
Error on Shared Service screen:
Post execution failed for - WebPlugin.importArtifacts.doImport. Unable to connect to "ApplicationName", ensure that the application is up and running.
Error on network:
“java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out”
ERROR - Zip error. The exception is -
java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error
at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite0(Native Method)
at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite(SocketOutputStream.java:92)
at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:136)
at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:65)

Hi,
First of all, if your environment for source and target are same then you will have all the users and groups in shared services, in that case you just have to provision the users for this new application so that your security will get migrated when you migrate the from the source application. If the environs are different, then you have to migrate the users and groups first and provision them before importing the security using LCM.
Coming back to the process of importing the artifacts in the target application using LCM, you have to place the migrated file in the @admin native directory in Oracle/Middleware/epmsystem1.
Open shared services console->File system and you will see the your file name under that.
Select the file and you will see all your exported artifacts. Select all if you want to do complete migration to target.
Follow the steps, select the target application to which you want to migrate and execute migration.
Open the application and you will see all your artifacts migrated to the target.
If you face any error during migration it will be seen in the migration report..
Thanks,
Sourabh

Authorization Issue with ODS

Dear all,
I have an authorization issue with two ODS.
One I activated for BEx reporting --> Is working fine in Dev, but I get error with
missing authorization in QUA, althought some authorizations.
Same issue with a newly created ODS, which works in Dev, but gives an error
with missing authorization in QUA.
What can be the reason for this? Any input is highly appreciated!
Cheers,
Claudia

Hi,
check that the role(s) are transported from your DEV and your QA, and that the user has the correct role(s)
Check as well in your QA transaction RSSM for your ODSs objects; it might be that by transporting the ODS, some authorizations have been applied by default.
hope this helps...
Olivier.

Is anyone else having issues with "skipping" while the songs are playing?! It is very aggravating to us... and we've had it going on for several months now. Any ideas at all how to fix it?

Is anyone else having issues with "skipping" while the songs are playing?! It is very aggravating to us... and we've had it going on for several months now. Any ideas at all how to fix it?

So, don't use youtube.
http://www.the-top-tens.com/lists/best-alternatives-youtube.asp
http://www.youtubealternative.com/

Authorization issue in WAD when executing planning function

Hi All,
I am facing the bellow authorization issue-
Termination message sent
WARNING BRAIN (800): You do not have the authorization for component !!AZF2PO_AGR
MSGV1: ZF2PO_AGR
MSGV2: REP
MSGV3: !!AZF2PO_AGR
MSGV4: 16
ABEND RSBOLAP (002): No Authorization
I am getting this issue When Calling Planning function from WAD application using button. This authorization fail is happening in portal when the Planning function is executed.
Error explains that there is no authorization for component u201C!!AZF2PO_AGRu201D.Where as in actual we donu2019t have any component as stated.
Instead we have an aggregation level with technical name ZF2PO_AGR.
We have already Assigned the below Planning objects-
S_RS_ALVL
S_RS_PLENQ
S_RS_PLSE
S_RS_PLSQ
S_RS_PLST
To Summarize-There is a web application with button linked to planning functuion.When clicked on this button after execution of web template we get the above error.
Have found note 1000006,but it says Support package 12 and all but we in support package 20

Hi Guys,
I know this thread is answered but I have a similar problem I think.
I have a WAD that is published to the portal. I have added the WAD to a page via a hyperlink, the page resides in KM. When a user opens the page, via a URL iView, the see the page, but when they click on the link to open the WAD, I get the following error:
Portal runtime error.
An exception occurred while processing your request. Send the exception ID to your portal administrator.
Exception ID: 07:19_26/02/10_0067_18934750
Refer to the log file for details about this exception.
When I assign the Super Admin (UME Role) to the user, they can execute the WAD no problem.
I am not an Authorizations person, so any pointers as to where I should start looking would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Freddie.

Authorization issue with VA02 radio buttons

Hello All,
We are stuck at one authorization issue. The user navigates using tcode VA02.
1)     Execute Tcode -VA02=>
2)     2) puts order number # 100001 =>
3)     press enter =>
4)     press enter =>
5)     Screen: Change (Company Name) Return 100001: Overview =>
6)     Option: Display doc. Header details (looks like a magnifying glass beside PO_date) =>
7)     This bring us to Change (Company Name) Return 100001: header Data =>
8)     select status tab =>
9)     on Status tab lower end there is a button u201CObject Statusu201D =>
10)     Press it =>
11)     Come to Change Status :
12)     On this screen There is Status with status no. on the right side with 7 options
e.g:
u2022     1 BLK Approval Required for,
u2022     2 BL1 Approval for Credit,
u2022     3 BL2 Approval for material Replacer
We need to restrict the radio button access for user for which we are unable to find the authorization object.
Could any one help.
Thanks & Regards
gab

Hi,
Use ST01 to trace the user activities and check which objects its hitting when you click on those buttons, then you can restrict radio buttons using those objects.
I have'nt run the tcode myself and performed the steps you mentioned, but if you think its calling other transaction from those buttons you can manage tht in SE97, or add the t-code VA02 in the S_tcode auth object in PFCG.
Hope this should get you going
Thanks,
Vijay

Authorization issue with upload functionality

Hi,
I have issue with authorization with upload functionality.
we have country as authorization relavant field. if we are giving some country authorization to user it is giving authorization error at upload functionality.
But if we give all country authorization than it is working fine.
Could you guide me how to avoid this situation. We can not give all country authorization to all the users.
Thanks,
Naman Shah

Hi Naman,
For SAP BPS
Here while defining a variable you can set the user authorization and can determine which all records can be seen by the user.
For eg. Create a variable for country with replacement type User-specific values. Here you can assign values to a particular user id.
Please check for more details:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/43/548bafbc0f357ee10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
For SAP IP
Please Check: User Authorization in SAP IP
Regards, Rishi
Edited by: Rishikesh Sinha on May 6, 2009 8:01 AM

Sap bi authorizations issue with query designer..

i am using bw 3.x and bi 7 query designer with different kind of probs?...
i am able to see the info provider in query desinger 3.x. but i can see only cubes .i am not able to find dso or infosets or multiprovider.. can anyone suggest is there any authorizations issues..please suggest.
and with BI 7 query designer i am not able to see info providers in info areas folder to design a query..
please suggest if any authorizations should be added or not

hi suman chakravar,
thanks for replying,
can u be little bit clear about the steps.
i went to tcode su01 and entered profile 0bi_all..it doesnt work.
and executed tcode su56.there i can find list of BI related authorization profiles
i added s_rs_all profile to my user. even then i face the same problem.
i can see only queries in query designer of bi 7 format and i can not view info providers.
i can view only cube and infosets and i can not view dso and multiproviders in bw 3.x type query designer
Edited by: satishchow on Dec 14, 2011 3:23 PM

Error while execute through SE30

Hi ,
An error "Runtime error GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED"
has occured while executing the report program with transaction SE30, for performance analysis.
However, when I executed the same with SE38.
Please help me regarding this.
Thanks,
Srinivas

Hi Srinu,
The runtime error you have mentioned occurs when a field-symbol has been used before it has been <i>assigned</i>.
Are you very sure that there's no such problem in your code ?
You have said that you don't get this error when you run the program through SE38. Dis you use the same values for the selection-screen (if there's one) in both SE38 and SE30 ? Because, it may very well happen that the program fails for some particular values.
And finally, if everything is okay, then please chekc if you have activated the program and all it's objects (screens., GUI Statuses, Includes, etc.,)
Let me know how it goes...
Regards,
Anand Mandalika.

I am having sound issues with Pottermore while using Safari 6.1. I once muted the sound and now can't unmute it even though the icon tells me it's unmated. I can hear samples of audio books in the store section. Any ideas?

I am having sound issues with the website Pottermore while using Safari 6.1. I once muted the sound and now can't unmute it even though the icon tells me it's unmuted. I can hear samples of audio books in the store section. Any ideas? I have reset Safari. Website works fine on Firefox.

I am having sound issues with the website Pottermore while using Safari 6.1. I once muted the sound and now can't unmute it even though the icon tells me it's unmuted. I can hear samples of audio books in the store section. Any ideas? I have reset Safari. Website works fine on Firefox.

Getting Computer authorization issue with 11.4!

When I try to synch my IPhone 5S on Windows 8.1 / iTunes 11.4, I keep getting a message that "This computer is not authorized for the apps that are installed on our iPhone" and when I de-authorize and authorize it again, it still does not work...keep getting this message...

Hey Ashfromsea,
Thanks for the question. I understand that you are experiencing issues with iTunes Store authorization. The following resources may provide a solution:
iTunes repeatedly prompts to authorize computer to play iTunes Store purchases
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1389
iTunes: Missing folder or incorrect permissions may prevent authorization
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1277
Thanks,
Matt M.

Computer Authorization issue with iTunes 11.4

When I try to synch my IPhone 5S on Windows 8.1 / iTunes 11.4, I keep getting a message that "This computer is not authorized for the apps that are installed on our iPhone" and when I de-authorize…

Hey Ashfromsea,
Thanks for the question. I understand that you are experiencing issues with iTunes Store authorization. The following resources may provide a solution:
iTunes repeatedly prompts to authorize computer to play iTunes Store purchases
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1389
iTunes: Missing folder or incorrect permissions may prevent authorization
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1277
Thanks,
Matt M.

Authorization issue with Inbound Delievries

Hi,
Can we control authorization of Inbound Delivery creation/Change (VL31N/VL32N) based on receiving point or storage location.
Currently we are only able to control authorization at Plant level which is wide open and client needs restriction at Receiving Point or Storage Location Level.
Let us know the Autho Object to resolve thie security restriction issue.
Regards,

Hi,
As i know, we can control the authorization at the Receiving Point level, but i am not sure about the Storage Location level.
You need to check the authorization object with Basis people.
Thanks
Aktar

Issue with BPM while calling store proc

Hi All,
We are using BPM to execute/call the store procedure for look up. We are sending the correct request; bu we are not get the expected output form BPM during runtime. No issue with store proc ,we doudble checked
Is there any way to debug the BPM part of it. Plz advise Any bok or suggestion will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Mohan

Integration Process monitoring:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/ab3f538e-0d01-0010-07b7-802c90b67eec&overridelayout=true
Regards,
Manjusha.

Serious Issue with "third party subscriptions" through text messages.

Forgive me for perhaps sounding dramatic. After having this experience I nearly paid the fee to break my contract and quit on cell phones all together. If apple gets the iPhone to a point where no cellular carrier is neccessary I will be the first to join the party. I'm going to start trying this skype thing this weekend. Anyway, I digress, here's what happened. I get my bill from AT&T and there is a charge for download activity for $3.99. Not the end of the world but I call the number to find out what the charge is all about because I thought I had an unlimited data plan. Turns out AT&T calls it a third party subscription fee. I argued that if AT&T is charging it on my bill as far as I'm concerned I'm not concerned about the details, I hold AT&T responsable for what they put on my bill. According to AT&T's rep I recieved a text message asking me if I wished to subscribe to their service. I don't do the text thing so I never read any message like this. HERE'S THE KICKER - BECAUSE I DID NOT RESPOND TO THE TEXT TO SAY NO THANKS I WAS AUTOMATICLY ENTERED INTO AN ILLEGAL CONTRACT TO PAY $3.99 MONTHLY FOR A SERVICE I'M NOT EVEN AWARE OF. I was absolutly irate. The ramifications are astronomical. This means I could get a limitless unexpected bill. I look at it this way: If I had to write a letter, address an envelope, and lick a stamp every time I got an advertisement in my snailmailbox, I would never get out of the house and I would have to get on welfare to afford the stamps. To me there is an obvious legal precidence here. I realize that this has more to do with AT&T than Apple. I simply want to emplore Apple to save us from a world of disintigrating business ethic. Cellular providers have gotten completely out of control. When I feel like I need a lawyer just to call AT&T to discuss the inconsistency of my bill there is a serious problem. I feel like entering into a contract with a cellular provider endangers my financial stability in a fragile era. It just seems rediculous for a business to become so arogant that they can speak nonsense to a customer and we are put in a position to defend against such nonsense. Several of my friends have run into the same issue with text third party subscriptions. Last night at a dinner party three indicated that they finally had all the cellular provider crap they could take and they canceled their iPhone service and put it up on ebay. I love my iPhone, it is the most useful piece of technology I have ever had the pleasure to enjoy. That being said, I cannot justify, as a household provider with a family depending on me, taking the risk of financial ruin (a $3000+ cell phone bill could do just that) initiated by arogant buisiness practaces that resemble the oppression I have witnessed through 12 years of military service in places with an excess of sand. I think it is apauling. I believe the FCC and FTC need to be brought into this. I intend to submit formal complaints to both and would encourage others that feel like I do to do the same.

Not to diss those trying to be helpful, but the do not call list has nothing to do with spam TXT messages sent from a computer, which is where the OP's problem probably began.
If a third party sent this message and then signed the OP up for a service he did not want, this violates any number of consumer laws and can be addressed that way. It's unclear whether this is really an AT&T issue at all, absent any evidence that it is their message or their service. It sounds to me like the CS reps do not understand the problem and are giving the not-helpful generic answer about spam TXTs. A much better solution is to set the SMS filters using AT&T's web site.
Similar scams work on landlines, where you can accidentally end up getting a huge charge on your phone bill for something that has nothing to do with the carrier.
I'd call the state consumer protection department.
-dan

Authorization Issue with AR01 while executing through a Variant

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for