Authorization management

Hi
Can anyone detail me about the Authorization management done in t-code PFCG.
and
Provide me a word, PDF document
Cheers
Maruthi Ram

Hi,
Visit SAP's online help link for [SAP Authorization Concept|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/52/671285439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm]
http://www.sap-press.de/download/dateien/726/sappress_authorization_system_engl.pdf
Regards,
Srilatha.

Similar Messages

The Bias Authorization manager Toast

The Bias Authorization Manager keeps asking for authorization and the serial number for the Toast2.when ever I opne Final Cut Pro HD which I just install. I trash the application but it still serach for it. I press ESC several times and it work but is there a way to erase completely the annoyin application? Thanks,
Alf

Hi John,
In Windows Server 2012, Authorization Manager (AzMan) is replaced by Simple Authorization. Simple Authorization is implemented by creating a local security group on the Hyper-V server called Hyper-V Administrators.
Refer to:
AzMan replacement for Hyper-V on Windows 2012 Server
If there is anything else regarding this issue, please feel free to post back.
Best Regards,
Anna Wang
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Hi Anna. thanks for your reply , but it was better to first read my entire question & then reply.
didn't you see this in my first question? :
so the only workaround is to add our users into "Hyper-v
Administrators" group in hyper-v Host LSD.
the downside of this is that users can manipulate their VM settings & configurations which is definitely undesirable (
for example they can change memory, processor, add disks,....)

Is there any way to Authorization Management for Material Components?

Hello every body
   Is there any way to Authorization Management for Material Components?
   For example i want to create , delete , modify Material Components,how i can Authorization Management ?
   Enhancement or IMG or other ways?
                                                                                thanks

Alas, no, not in VBA.
Regards, Hans Vogelaar (http://www.eileenslounge.com)

2008 R2: Authorization Manager Permissions do not apply

I used authorization manager to modify the initialstore.xml.
I created a new role definition to allow techs to manage vms. Start, Stop, Reconfigure VMs. All View Options. and some more.
I created a new role assignment and added the the technician ad group
I closed the file.
Hyperv manager still shows you do not have required permission. contact the admin of the auth policy.
Am I missing a permission that they need or is the policy not applying to Hyper-v. The changes persist when I close and repopen the xml file.
We do use failover cluster and scvmm for this hyperv instance, if that matters.

It does matter if you use SCVMM.
SCVMM replaces the default authorization manager store with its own. (there was a bug at one time that the over-rode any modifications you made)
The SCVMM team runs with the concept that if you are using SCVMM, then you are doing all of your actions in SCVMM and SCVMM is thus vetting the permissions.
Also, most folks use HVRemote to set AuthMan properly.
Brian Ehlert
http://ITProctology.blogspot.com
Learn. Apply. Repeat.

Authorization Management Tool (AMT) - SAP Library

To add a comment, please log in or register on the top of this page and choose Reply. Please write your comment in English.
You can also go back to the SAP help page.

For more info on this tool you can refer to SAP SCN Wiki at link....
Authorization Management Tool - CRM - SCN Wiki

Authorization Management Tool

HI,
I am planning to give access rights for the mobile client users using Authorization Management Tool.
I have a site id assinged and i am working in that site id.
I have defined a role gave the access permissions to the role.
Now i want to assign the role to the users .
But i could not see other users except my user id and so i cant assign the role to the users.
Is there any way that we can see al the other users in my site or is there any other way to define roles to the mobile client users.

Hi Andrew,
You are right .
I assigned the Users (by Employee) subscriptions to my site.
Even then I am not able to see other users.
I am only seeing my user id.
Do i need to download any customizing objects after i assigned the subscriptions or DO i need to do anything else.
I ran the ConnTrans after assigning the subscriptions.
Message was edited by: zack taylor

CRM - Authorization Management Tool

Hi All,
I am new to CRM-MS-AMT can someone tell, if Protected Business Objects area is the only place business object should be available on the Authorization Management Tool? Because right now I only have 80 protected business objects should their be more available? Any information you provide pertaining to AMT- Business Objects would be greatly appreciated.
Jeanell

Hi Jeanell,
About 80 should be correct.
You should refer to the following link form the SAP Online help. For this tool it is quite good.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40sr1/helpdata/en/93/96033c1c902c05e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Regards,
Gervase

How to handle exeptions and authorization management in WEB SERVICES

Hi all,
Please send some documents or links on handling exceptions in web services and Authorization management also.
Useful will be rewarded.
Regards
Neslin.

i suggest to consult the documentation at help.sap.com, use the search function to the left or make your question more specific.
regards, anton

Oracle Service Cloud Achieves Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program Provisional Authority to Operate

News Summary
Oracle Service Cloud -- a software-as-a-service (SaaS) solution -- has received a Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) moderate provisional Authority to Operate (p-ATO) from the Joint Authorization Board (JAB), comprised of the Chief Information Officers (CIOs) of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), and U.S. General Services Administration (GSA).
News Facts
Oracle announced that Oracle Service Cloud -- a software-as-a-service (SaaS) solution -- has received a Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) moderate provisional Authority to Operate (p-ATO) from the Joint Authorization Board.
The Oracle Service Cloud is Oracle's premier Software as a Service (SaaS) solution providing the industry's best in class customer service platform for enterprise customers. Oracle customers can deploy Oracle Service Cloud onto a robust, secure infrastructure hosting Oracle's patented customer experience (CX) software applications in an environment accredited to FedRAMP-moderate specifications.
Oracle Service Cloud has been granted a p-ATO by the FedRAMP's Joint Authorization Board (JAB), the primary governance and decision-making body for the FedRAMP program. A JAB p-ATO provides a government wide view for security and stringent review by the JAB Technical Representatives from the DHS, DOD, and GSA. As a result, government customers can save time and money by leveraging Oracle's JAB approval to grant their own authority to operate without having to go through a full certification and accreditation.
The rigorous review of Oracle's environment was completed by an accredited third-party organization at the FedRAMP moderate baseline level, for a SaaS offering using a community deployment model.
Supporting Quotes
"Oracle is very excited to announce the Service Cloud p-ATO as we continue to work towards meeting our public sector customers' demands for a highly secure, robust suite of cloud solutions built for government," Aaron Erickson, Director of Government Innovation, Public Sector North America, Oracle.
EMarkets Daily
Executive Biz
FCW.com
Markets Daily
Tech Taffy
Business Week
CNN
Congoo
Yahoo Finance

Have you checked the docs? There are some specific docs for enabling security like http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18941_01/tutorials/jdtut_11r2_29/jdtut_11r2_29.html
which guide you through the process.
Timo

NAKISA : Flexibility of authorization management

Hi Experts,
Can the authorizations in Nakisa modules be managed independently from those defined in SAP Back-End/Portal knowing that SSO is needed ? Does it depend on the Nakisa module version ?
To provide more details : hereafter are the requirements. Is it possible with standard features ?
HR user authorization :
- In Back-End/Portal (ECC6.0 EhP4) : Restricted access based on structural authorization and filter on grade (No issue for that thanks to SAP)
- In Succession Planning (V3.0 SP1) with SSO : Same restricted access as in Back-End/Portal (No issue for that since from what I understand, authorization are leverage in NAKISA from SAP)
- In OrgChart (V1.1) with SSO : No restriction, every employee must be seen => Issue ?
Manager authorization :
- In Back-End/Portal : Restricted access based on structural authorization (No issue for that thanks to SAP)
- In OrgChart (V1.1) with SSO : Same restricted access as in Back-End/Portal => Issue/conflict with previous requirement for HR user authorization ?
Thanks for your help.
Cheers.

HI Kevin,
Context :
- An HR user has authorizations defined in SAP Back-End/Portal with structural
authorization and filter on population.
If you are using OrgChart in Live mode with any authentication mode other than anonymous then these authorizations will be used for all calls by OrgChart to SAP.
Authorization requirements for Nakisa modules :
- From SAP Portal and under SSO, this HR user connects to Succession Planning (V3.0
SP1) with same restriction as in SAP
This will be the same, although if you are using EhP4 an Area of Responsibility must be set between the Position of the HR user and the OrgUnit(s) for which they are responsible for Succession Planning.
- From SAP Portal and under SSO, the same HR user connects to OrgChart (V1.1)
without any restriction (every employees must be seen)
This will only work if you use anonymous authentication or the Staged mode. The structure may be visible to everybody if you do not make any customizations for dynamic rooting, although this depends on your authorizations.
I hope that helps.
Best regards.
Luke

Authorization manager (azman) for hyper-v control with replication

I am using a pair of server 2012 machines for hyper-v hosts with replication enabled and I need to use azman to set up users who are authorized to manage (start/stop/restart) selected VMs only. The instructions I have seen use the hyper-v XML data
store. I have not seen a way to replicate the data store between the 2 hyper-v hosts. Assuming that I set up duplicate authorizations on the 2 machines, do I need to set the VM scope on both servers or just the primary server of the replication
pair. I do not have a pair of servers to test with so I will be using test VMs on the production hosts.
The process seems straightforward until replication is added.

1) Azman is supposed to work in Server 2012. I have not seen any other way to implement the user-level control of selected VMs using the Server 2012 OS. I am trying to avoid the additional cost of SCVMM to accomplish what is supported by the
OS in server 2008 and 2012.
2) I don't understand the intersection between VM replication and user control on the hosts, hence the question. If replication, once set up, only replicates changes on the VHD then I probably need to set up duplicate scopes and authorities on the
two replication partner hosts. If replication is smart enough to replication the scope information then the scopes need to be defined only on the primary server. This part of the question seems to have been answered in an earlier response - the
scopes (and I assume the Azman authorizations) need to be set up on both servers. If this is the case then my only problem is accomplishing what can be done in server 2008 and 2012 un server 2012R2 without using azman or SCVMM.

Best Practices - Authorization Management

Hello:
I am quite familiar with R/3 security, however I am new to BW. We are using BW 3.5.
We are trying to figure out the best approach to handle our authorization requirements.
Here are some of our goals:
1) Master authorization will be maintained in our R/3 system which hosts HR and FI/CO. This system will feed security informaiton to the BW system. Every user will have accounts on both systems. We want to keep the adiministration tasks easier.
2) When running reports, users may view only the areas they are authorized to view (such as certain nodes within a hierarcy).
3) Same report on the BW system will provide diff output based on who runs the report (even though the selection parameters will be the same).
How are you handling these types of requirements?
Thanks ...
Shovon

You will be able to get the R/3 HR authorizations to be BW systems using the standard SAP delivered data sources (0HR_PA_2 and 0HR_PA_3). The attached document explains the step by step isntructions for doing the same. BW also provides a tool RSSM for generating authorization profiles based on this data transferred from the R/3 system.
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700002734142002
In order to make sure the users will see only their own data you can use the BW info object level security, there are different approaches for doing this, you can generate the profiles from HR data, from flat file, variables etc.
In your case I think you might want to use the HR approach. The attached document links will provide a clear understanding of the BW security options.
Creating comples authorizations will have a negative impact on the BW query performance, one more thing to keep in mind is, with the next release of BW NW 2004s, the authorization concept is totally different. It is based on a new architecture, SAP provides tools for migrating to the new platform but the complex the authorizations you have more difficult to migrate.
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700003962052001E/infoindex_entry.htm#a
Thanks.

Installed Base - Authorization Management

Dear Experts
We're looking for any way to limit authorizations for Installed Base and iObject maintenance. So far we were able to identify COM_PRD as the only relevant authorization object (for iObjects) - I strongly assume there are more sophisticated capabilities than this one? I see authorization groups are available, we're looking for some more flexibility however.
E.g.
- differentiate between product and object maintenance
- limit visibility based on e.g. country
- limit maintainability of the installed base itself
Best
Christian

Hi Joost, All,
during our investigation we found that the object you are referring to is not checked any more (SU24 does not return any hits neither in transactions nor in web services). A trace comfirmed this assumption so far.
We are currently assuming that this object is not used anymore in CRM 2007 and later versions.
Any comments from anyone here?
Thanks
Alex

Authorization Manager

I'm trying to record a Visual Script but Authentication Manager is not recording users and passwords.
I tried to config Auth Manager manually but it seems not to recognize login screens.
Is there any way to enable Auth Manager recording?

Pep
There is not automatic recording for authentication manager, it needs to be set up later.
Note that some usernames also require a domain e.g
in the username text box enter: +<domain>\<username>+ instead of +<username>+
Bon Dia
Alex

Use of Tokens in Authorization Management Tool

Hello,
In Mobile Sales (5.0), I'm trying to restrict users from changing data of BP's with an specific Account Group. This means, the sales rep should have only read-access to BP's with Account Group = "001", but read, write and modify access to BP's with the rest of values of Account Group.
For this, I have protected object BOKNA1, defined rule for field KTOKD, created a token with this rule and variable rule. Then, I have created a new role and assigned the token to this role, with value for the variable="001".
My question is: do I have to give UI Rights to this role, or do I have to create another Role with rights to the MSA, and then assign both roles to the user?
Thanks!!!!
Judit.

Thank you Wolfhard,
I have tried two solutions:
First solution:
- Create a single role
- Give UIRights to this role, to read-modify- create (at tile level)
- For the same role, assign two tokens (with read only for one case, and read and modify for the other case).
When I do this, I can read, modify and create for all BP.
Second solution:
- Create a single role
- Give UIRights to this role, to read (at tile level)
- For the same role, assign two tokens (with read only for one case, and read and modify for the other case).
When I do this, I can only read, for all the BP's
Thus, it seems that tokens are not being taken into account, but only the UI Rights-
Any ideas would be welcomed!
Thanks again
Judit.

Authorization management

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for