Authorization message problem with variant transaction

Hello everybody, I have created a transaction variant ZMM01 from transaction MM01. In the role I specified this new transación (ZMM01) in S-TCODE.
I can create the material but at the end, instead of the message "material zzz created" I received the message "you are not authorised to MM01".
Does anybody know how to solve this problem?
Thanks in advance.
Maria

Thanks for your quick answer but if I run SU53 the result is the following:
Object class AAAB Cross-application Authorization Objects
Authorization Obj. S_TCODE Transaction Code Check at Transactio Start
Authorization Field TCD Codi de transacció MM01.
If I include this I allow the user to access transction MM01, but I don´t want to.

Similar Messages

Problems with variant transaction zme51n

Hi,
I have created a variant transaction zme51n.
But I can only start the transaction when I add the original transaction 'me51n'
in T_Code in profile generator.
Any ideas why?
Thanx for your help in advance.
Thomas

Hallo Rob,
thanx for your help. I think we're on the right track...
Greetings.
Thomas

I have a problem with the transaction CBIH82

Hi experts,
I have a problem with the transaction CBIH82, when I try to assign a team in the tab "EventLocation", the transaction sends me the message "Equipment not available at the functional location".
I previously reviewed the equipment is assigned to the transaction IL03.
No authorization errors, I checked with the transaction SU53.
Any idea to solve this problem?
I appreciate it.

Hello,
I happened to again see this post where question is yet to be answered.
As per SAP standard design, only those equipment would be allowed which are directly installed on the functional location. What this means is that those equipment which are not directly assigned to the functional location (might be assigned to another superior equipment which in turn is assigned to the functional location) can't be saved.
Now, I am not sure why SAP has kept it like this when the same is allowed in notification.
Can somebody clarify the business relevance of this standard behavior??
Regards,
Pavan

HT1349 Hi all,I have just purchased new iphone but have difficulty in completing the itunes download with message : problem with Windows installer package. A program run as part of the setup did not finish as expected.

Hi all,I have just purchased new iphone but have difficulty in completing the itunes download with message : problem with Windows installer package. A program run as part of the setup did not finish as expected.
Would appreciate help...its driving me up the wall!!

Perhaps let's first try updating your Apple Software Update.
Launch Apple Software Update ("Start > All Programs > Apple Software Update"). Does it launch and offer you a newer version of Apple Software Update? If so, choose to install just that update to Apple Software Update. (Deselect any other software offered at the same time.)
If the ASU update goes through okay, try another iTunes install. Does it go through without the errors this time?

Trying to upgrade to 10.6 so my iPhone could synch...I'm getting this error message "Problem with this Windows (XP) Installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run." Any ideas?

I had iTunes 10.2.1.1 but needed to upgrade to 10.6 so my iPhone could synch...I'm getting this error message "Problem with this Windows (XP) Installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run." Any ideas?

This has been fixed. Answer is that I needed to go to "Apple Software Update" and repair it. (From my Control Panel).

Problem with variant

Hi SDN experts,
what is the Transaction variant ? and Screen variant?

Hi,
Use transaction variant to make your fields mandatory, hidden or display. You can hide unwanted screens and fields in any of the standard SAP programs without changing any of the standard programs. Additional features such as making the variant as default on the standard SAP transaction code is only available on 4.6x.
Steps:
Transaction SHD0 - Create a variant for the required transaction bychanging the layout through hiding fields and screens.
Transaction SE93 - Create a variant transaction (e.g. for VA02 you canname it as ZA02). Next allocate the transaction variant to this varianttransaction.
Create and change the Zxxx area menu with the new transaction variant. In this way, the user does have to remembers any extra transaction codes.
In 4.6c, you can default your transaction variant as the standard variant. (SHD0 - Edit -> Activate/Deactivate asstandard variant)
An example for using transaction variant (restricting the field displayfor CO11N - Goods movement) :-
If you want to restrict changes to the fields in Goods movement forone group of users.
1. Create a transaction variant for CO11N
2. Create a new transction code for the transaction variant and assign an authorization object to it
3. Divide the users into this two transaction code. Those who can change the field using CO11N. For those that have limited
field change, give them the authorizationfor ZCO11 (this is a new transaction code you have to create).
For more information, please check this links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_webas620/helpdata/en/eb/5fab41d79b11d296190000e82de14a/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/132f9803d76f40e10000000a422035/content.htm
http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/tvar.htm
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

LT04 problems with call transaction

Hello,
I am using RF and creating screens for users to putaway material in a raw material warehouse based on a material document number from the GRN which is linked to a TR (transfer requirement). I am, however, having problems with the TO creation where the material is QM relevant.
I have used function module L_TO_CREATE_TR which works for non-QM relevant items but most of our items are QM relevant. I am trying to process these by creating a TO using LT04 as a call transaction.
However, before I can put in a bin , the screen that appears in order to enter the bin has an error message before anything has been input - 'No destination storage bin to be found in storage type 001 "(L3 009).
Anyone have any suggestions how I can get around this as I cannot create the TO in the background using LT04 because of this error.
Regards
Larissa Maryniuk

As mentioned in my original question, I cannot use the LTOCREATE_FROM_TR FM for items set with stock category Q as these are QM relevant. If you try and create a TO from a TR using L_TO_CREATE_TR you get an error of 2 which is item is QM relevant. I cannot see how I can use WS_LM_TRANSFER_ORDER_CREATE as you cannot put in the TR number anywhere. Other than these 2 cannot see how I can create a TO from a TR without using LT04.
If I use LT04 and set as backrground I get the message specified. The way to get around the error using LT04 is only available if T04 is set as Foreground on the front screen instead of background.
Anyone have any suggestions?
Edited by: Larissa Maryniuk on Jan 25, 2010 11:41 AM

Boot message: problem with hard drive detected. Slow loading of windows 7

Good Day
I am having a problem with my hard drive, everytime it boots these days it starts with a message: Warning: a problem with the hard drive has been detected, followed by an extremely slow loading of windows. then once in windows it gives me Anothet message
the messsage says hard drive failure imminent you should back up you data etc.
My specs are:
Intel core 2 duo e8400 3.0 ghz
4 gig ddr3 transcend
1 tb seagate 7200.12
giga byte nvidia 9800 gt 1 gig ddr3
Please help lots of data.

Another option:
Take your hard drive out and slave it into another KNOWN WORKING PC.
Back-up your data immediately. Slow boot usually indicates that the drive is going to die. (Check your warranty!)
Then, run "chkdsk /r" from the host PC to check the failing drive. (It is good to match OSes if you can.)
MCSE: 6771498

Problem with "Call Transaction" which calls a view cluster

Hi Colleagues ,
I have a rare issue with the call transaction , here is the use case for it :
1> I call a transaction(calls a screen X) in a report ,
2> I have a button in the screen , which calls another transaction(calls a screen X2) .
3> On the screen X2 i have another button which calls transaction (calls the view cluster ).
problem :
i'm not able to see the navigation pane in the view cluster on the left. its missing .
but when the view cluster is called direclty , i'm able to see the navigation pane in the view cluster ..
My initial doubt was , is this the problem with nesting of 'Call Transaction' calls ????
please answer the thread , i have to fix this ASAP.
regards,
Dilip

problem solved.

Problem with Call Transaction opt-RACOMMIT = 'X'.

Hello Experts
I am having a problem with call transction. I am calling a Z transaction in function module. Within the Z transaction I am furhter calling some function modules and doing commit work and then some more processing after the comit work inside So to make sure the code after comit work is fired I am using opt-RACOMMIT = 'X' in call transaction. Whenever I set this parameter opt-RACOMMIT = 'X' call transaction fails and gives error saying No batch Input data for screen XXXX. However the Z tcode processed succesfully.
By changing the Mode to E i found that it remians at the last screen of call transction after executing the Z transaction and never comes back
But if I donot use RACOMMIT = 'X' everything is fine. Please let me know if anyone came across such problem. Any help will be apreciated.
Thanks,
kamal

Hello,
as you said, if there is more than commit statement in your ztransaction, then you should put RACOMMIT to 'X'.
I think the problem is in your bdcdata: change it to be sure to get back to the 1st screen of your ztransaction. Then, at this point (1st screen) hit "back" button.
Cordialement,
Chaouki

Message "problem with photo with the filename '(null).

I get the following message "There is a problem with the photo with the filename '(Null).' The full resolution version of this photo either cannot be located or is corrupt. Please replace the photo or delete it from your book." This message appears after place the order and it starts to submit the pages of the book. I get as far as page 9 of 60. I have open the pictures using photoshop and have renamed them and saved them as a tif format. Any suggestions?

annefromtallahassee wrote:
I get the following message "There is a problem with the photo with the filename '(Null).' The full resolution version of this photo either cannot be located or is corrupt. Please replace the photo or delete it from your book." This message appears after place the order and it starts to submit the pages of the book. I get as far as page 9 of 60. I have open the pictures using photoshop and have renamed them and saved them as a tif format. Any suggestions?
I believe that you have gone into the iPhoto library and made changes using photoshop - is that correct
If so then you have trashed your iPhoto library and must put it back exactly as it was - loading a backup is the easiest (probably the only) way
NEVER make any changes to the content or structure of the iPhoto library using the finder or any program that is not fully iPhoto aware
LN

Messages problem with ios 6

Hi
I have problem with messages related to bank or groups or unviersity . I can see the preview of last message but when I enter for example Bank I can't see any Previous messages . Some messages contain imp information . Can u fix this problem soon as possaible please .

I'm having the same problem with texts showing as unread. I click on the conversation and then click on back to go to the conversations and after about a second the texts go back to unread. It shows as 2 unread texts from my wife. I deleted 5 messages from the conversations, and the dot went away for a second and came right back and said two unread texts again! I had her send me a text and it went to 3 unread texts. Clicked into the conversation then back out and it went back down to 2 and the stupid blue dot came back! I've rebooted the phone and that doesn't help either.

ECR/ECO problem with automated transactions

Hi Friends,
I have problem with automated close of ECR.
Description:
I have change number with one object - Inspection Plan.
In CC32 when "Incorrect Change" is set and I click "Erro Corrected" - nothink happen
(it should show popup with information that transaction cc06 was automated started)
After that when i choose "Release Change" - also nothing happen.
(it should shop popup and set status - "Close ECO")
Everything works ok on sandbox system but on Dev/Test/Prod it doesn't work.
Anybody now where could be a problem?
Thank you for any advice.

Hi
Pls check this Link
SAP-ECM and PPPI Integration-Solution
Thanks in advance

Sent messages problem with 6021

I have brand new 6021 - the memory of the phone is by default half empty.
In the settings I have enabled the option of save sent messages.
However, this does not happen. Simply, sent messages are not saved. Up to only one message is saved - on the sim card. After that, the phone simply does not register sent messages.
With the inbox, everything works fine.
I tried reset to factory settings, and other options, but unfortunately nothing is working.
ANy idea how can I activate this function?? And what might be the cause of the problem?
Thanks in advance,

Those message usually indicates, that your in an area with a weak wifi or cellular data signal. I speak from experience as this is the only I see that message pop up on my phone.

Message redelivery with non-transactional message bean JMS standard or weblogic standard?

It is my understanding (or maybe my assumption) that a message is
          re-queued only if the transaction attribute of a container-managed
          message bean is set to "Required" and the message is PERSISTENT. So if
          it's set to "NotSupported", and thus, message receival is not within a
          transaction, the message would be un-queued and thus never be
          redelivered, should a failure occur within the bean. I discovered that
          even if the message bean is set as "NotSupported", should a failure
          occur within the bean, the message is re-queued to be received again
          at a later time.
          I'm very confused as to whether this mechanism is a JMS standard, or a
          feature of Weblogic. Well, maybe I'm just confused about message
          delivery/re-delivery. I understand that the JMS standard requires
          guaranteed delivery of a message to a receiver. Does this mean a
          message is only considered delivered if an acknowledgement is
          received, regardless of the transaction level? In other words, is the
          JMS standard that a message is considered delivered only if
          acknowledgement is indicated through the container, regardless of the
          transaction level of the message bean itself?


You're right on the second part. That is, a JMS message is not considered to
          be "delivered" until it is acknowledged. There are a number of ways to make
          this happen when programming to the raw JMS API -- a look at the Javadoc for
          JMS or a good JMS book should clarify how to do this.
          With a message-driven bean, the EJB container acknowledges the message after
          you've successfully returned from the "onMessage" method. If you throw a
          RuntimeException from the "onMessage" method, or if it's an MDB with a
          transaction mode of "Required" and you call "setRollbackOnly" on the
          "MessageDrivenContext" object -- then your message will be redelivered.
          Regardless of how a message is acknowledged, if it's not acknowledged then
          it will be redelivered. This has nothing to do with whether the message is
          persistent. The difference is that if a message is persistent, then the JMS
          server is required to keep a copy on stable storage until the message is
          acknowledged so that if the JMS server itself crashes, the message will not
          be lost. For a non-persistent message, on the other hand, if the JMS server
          crashes, then the message may be lost.
          greg
          "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:[email protected]...
          > It is my understanding (or maybe my assumption) that a message is
          > re-queued only if the transaction attribute of a container-managed
          > message bean is set to "Required" and the message is PERSISTENT. So if
          > it's set to "NotSupported", and thus, message receival is not within a
          > transaction, the message would be un-queued and thus never be
          > redelivered, should a failure occur within the bean. I discovered that
          > even if the message bean is set as "NotSupported", should a failure
          > occur within the bean, the message is re-queued to be received again
          > at a later time.
          >
          > I'm very confused as to whether this mechanism is a JMS standard, or a
          > feature of Weblogic. Well, maybe I'm just confused about message
          > delivery/re-delivery. I understand that the JMS standard requires
          > guaranteed delivery of a message to a receiver. Does this mean a
          > message is only considered delivered if an acknowledgement is
          > received, regardless of the transaction level? In other words, is the
          > JMS standard that a message is considered delivered only if
          > acknowledgement is indicated through the container, regardless of the
          > transaction level of the message bean itself?

Authorization message problem with variant transaction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for