Authorization object CRM_ORD_OE is not woring in Production but in DEV

Hi,
In CRM system authorization object for sales office is working fine in DEV and Quality but not working in PRD.
What will be the necessary steps to identify the mistake to trace the above mentioned issue?
Thanks..
Pranab

Hi Alex,
I had that option in front of me ( we actually tried it also with no result ). But before that I would like to know, why this might have happened. Why there is difference between standard menu on both servers?
Regards,
Shamish

Similar Messages

  • Query not executing on production but on dev server

    Hi,
    I have few queries which are running in less then a second in development server but couldn't get executed on production server in three hours. Production box is much heavier then the development server. I have verified the init.ora parameters. both the boxes have same parameters and same data. How should I start the investigation on the same problem?
    Need urgent help.
    Thanks is Advance.
    Thanks, Dewan

    user463820 wrote:
    Production box is much heavier then the development server. I have verified the init.ora parameters. both the boxes have same parameters and same data.Which might be a contributing factor to:
    I have few queries which are running in less then a second in development server but couldn't get executed on production server in three hours. Do you have QA environment with production-like data? In any case, make sure statistics is collected and is up to date. Get explain plan for queries in question. See if execution plan isn't optimal.
    SY.

  • Authorization objects in RAR not updated

    Hi everyone,
    i'm facing an issue with RAR (GRC 5.3, SP10): i've just imported the authorization objects from SAP (SE38 -> /VIRSA/ZCC_DOWNLOAD_SAPOBJ -> saved in UTF8 format), but when i look the  function in the rule architet the authorization objects setting are not the same:
    Example: in SAP the transaction F-04 needs the auth obj  F_BKPF_BLA/BUK/KOA (i use transaction SU22 to check the auth obj) and the export file has the same settings:
    F-04     F_BKPF_BLA     ACTVT          
    F-04     F_BKPF_BLA     BRGRU          
    F-04     F_BKPF_BUK     ACTVT     01     
    F-04     F_BKPF_BUK     BUKRS     $BUKRS     
    F-04     F_BKPF_KOA     ACTVT          
    F-04     F_BKPF_KOA     KOART     $KOART     
    In RAR the transaction F-04 is in the function AP01, AR01, AR02, GL01. The transaction has different settings in every function: in AP01 there is only F_BKPF_KOA in status active, in AR01 there are F_BKPF_BUK and KOA in status active,...
    I re-generated all the rules, but the settings are still the same.
    I think the settings must be the same.
    Am i right?
    Thanks in advance!
    Luigi

    Luigi,
      The function has all the associated auth objects, right? All the auth objects/permissions may not be enabled in the function. As you are using standard SAP ruleset, SAP has determined that the combination of F-04 and associated enabled auth objects create violation when assigned with another set of tcodes and auth objects. You can always enable all the auth objects if that is what makes sense as per your business.
    Can you go through the RAR config guide to get an understanding on this?
    Regards,
    Alpesh

  • I have a problem with Adobe Creative Cluod. Basically after installing the application when I open it I do not charge adobe products but remains all white screen. I tried to uninstall it and install it several times but it does not work.  What should I do

    I have a problem with Adobe Creative Cluod. Basically after installing the application when I open it I do not charge adobe products but remains all white screen. I tried to uninstall it and install it several times but it does not work.
    What should I do?

    Hi Anto2211,
    Please follow the thread: Black screen CC where this issue is already discussed and resolved.
    Let me know for any further query.
    Thanks,
    Ratandeep Arora

  • SAP standard Menu : few menu paths not visible in Production but dev

    Hi All,
    We have a problem where in we can see the following menu path visible in standard menu in developement system; while the same menu path ( and few others also ) not visible in production system for same user ( i.e. having similar authorizations )
    the path is :  SAP Menu --> Accounting --> Financial Supply Chain Management --> Cash and Liquidity Management
    Our system is : ECC 6.0
    Every user should be able to view SAP standard menu inspite of the fact that he might have authorization to certain transactions only; hence this should not be an authorization issue ( as per my view ).
    So can anybody help/ suggest in this regard?
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Shamish

    Hi Alex,
    I had that option in front of me ( we actually tried it also with no result ). But before that I would like to know, why this might have happened. Why there is difference between standard menu on both servers?
    Regards,
    Shamish

  • OSS note is not working in production but works correctly in test system .

    hello friends ,
    weh have implemented one OSS notes , which is working corectly in Test system , but not working in production .
    Could you please let me know , what could be the reason ?
    OSS note no 1064273-
    Regards,
    Manoj

    Pls. check with Basis if the OSS note has been implemented properly and successfully.

  • Authorization object in MV45AFZZ not working

    Hi,
    I am using the aurhorization object C_CREC_WRK in the user exit MV45AFZZ in form USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP to 
    restrict the user at plant level while creating the sales order. While doing so the authorization is not working correctly. I have maintained the appropriate aithorization for the user and plant in PFCG but still its not validating in the exit.
    But if I use the same object in se38 in a z program it work prefect. I am not getting where is the problrm is. is  there any
      restriction for the object in mv45afzz.
    Regards,
    Vaibhav B Gawali.

    When calling the script object that is embedded in the fragment you have to path specifically to that object. The scriptobjectName.method is not enough to find what you want. You would need FragmentName.ScriptObjectName.Method()
    I tried it here and it worked.
    You may want to use a script Fragment instead of using an embedded script object on a fragment. The script fragment would run in the form root context and would behave like you are expecting.

  • Object range number not exist in production

    Hi guys,
    I have a problem where I had created an object range number in development server. The object works fine in development server. However , when I transported the object to the production server, the object did not exist eventhough the transport process was successful. Can anybody kindly explain to me why does this happen? TQ.

    Hi eric,
    Actually when I look again at the transport log for the particular object, I found that it actually had an error like below. Are you familiar with this error?. Anyway thanks again.
    Screen 1:
    =======
    DEVK913659    ZFICHKPOSN-Number Range Objects for Rece 02.01.2008 16:42
    --   DEV DBKL Development
    ADO export                02.01.2008 16:42:36 Ended OK               (0)
    Export                    02.01.2008 16:42:44 Ended OK               (0)
      ---   PRD DBKL Production
    Import                    02.01.2008 17:03:54 Ended OK               (0)
    ADO import                02.01.2008 17:03:58 Cancelled             (12)
    ==============================================
    Later, when I click at 'Cancelled'..
    Screen 2:
    =======
    Log file:                /usr/sap/trans/log/DEVD913659.PRD
    Import application-defined objects
    Transport request___: DEVK913659
    System______________: PRD
    tp path             : tp
    Version and Release: 252.08.36 40B
    Import application-defined objects
    End date and time___: 20080102170358
    Ended with return code:  ===> 12 <===

  • Transport authorization objects in BW

    Hi gurus,
    I have this problem regarding authorization objects for reporting in BW:
    I hace created in DEV some authorization objects and linked them to some infoproviders.
    When I make the transport to PRD system, I can see these objects but they are link to other inforproviders and not the ones that are marked in the dev system. The OT doen´t seem to have any trouble, but ¿why has this happened?.
    As you know, I can´t select the correct infoproviders in prd system, and moreover I can´t erase them because I have already created profiles using these objects.
    I think an option would be to pass again an OT, but I think the same problem may arise again.
    I would appreciatte any kind of help.
    Thanks,
    Luis

    It's the same as you would in another system.
    SE84 -> Other Objects -> Auth Objects
    Choose your object and then there will be the option to transport it in menu item Authorization Obj's

  • Authorization Object for Workbook

    Hi...
    I have a ENDUSER role. The users assigned to this role, can only display and execute queries. (S_RS_COMP & S_RS_COMP1 are given activities 'Display(03), Execute(16) and Enter, Include & Assign (22)'.
    But, the users now, cannot build Workbooks out of queries. Is there a way, where I can allow the user assigned to ENDUSER role, to build Workbooks.
    I found an authorization object S_RS_WKBK, which is relevant to this, but its says obselete (do not use). So, am unable to use it.
    Can anyone say me the Authorization Object used for allowing Users to create and save their workbooks?
    Thanks,
    Sai.

    Hi Sai,
    For saving workbooks in Favorites you need:
    S_GUI
    S_BDS_DS
    For saving workbooks in Roles you need:
    S_USER_AGR
    S_USER_TCD
    Best regards,
    Eugene

  • Storage Location Authorization Object

    Dear all,
    I am trying to restrict a user on some particular Storage Locations , but when we apply the restriction , the user can still access all other St Loc.. Could u pls help..
    Wants to do the same for Movement Type as well..
    Thanks in advance..

    Hi,
    Go to SPRO > MM > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Authorization Management > Authorization Check for Storage Locations > Here activate the authorization for storage location under plant
    And use authorization object as "M_MSEG_LGO"
    Note: - In this step, you activate storage location authorization for individual storage locations.
    Storage location authorization means that a user has to have authorization for authorization object M_MSEG_LGO in order to enter a goods movement in the storage location, using a particular movement type. In the list of material documents, only the document items for which the user has a display authorization are displayed.

  • Authorization object P_ASRCONT

    Hi Experts,
    I want to assign authorization object P_ASRCONT to one user. Also I need to check the particular user has this authorization object P_ASRCONT or not.
    Can anybody help me on this?
    Thanks,
    Helps will be appreciated.

    Hi,
    Procedure for checking authorization object assigned to user:-
    T-code: SUIM --> roles -->roles by authrorization object
    Enter authorization object --> Execute
    Double click on roles --> Click on user
    Regards
    Sudheer

  • PT60 the field Personnel Area( PERSA ) of the authorization object P_ORGIN

    Hi,
    When running transaction PT60 the field Personnel Area( PERSA ) of the authorization object P_ORGIN is not checked.
    I have run SU24 ,the objects are there with chech indicator of authorization object = "CHECK".
    What can I do about it ? Is there any note to fix this ?
    thanks!
    Olivia Yang

    Hi,
    In object P_ORGIN what you need to check for authorisation is it on Personnel area or PSA.Actually we have org.key for authorisation which is define in P_ORGIN.If you can define org. key as PA/PSA/EG/ESG you can check the authorisation for specific users.
    Regards,
    Snita

  • CRM_ORD_LP Authorization Object

    Hello everyone,
    I will be really thankful if you help me fix a problem.
    I try to use authorization object CRM_ORD_LP which must let me grant access to opportunities to users who are from the same organizational unit. But it doesn't give result.
    I tried the authorization object CRM_ORD_OE, but there I need to include the number of org unit, that means for me that i need to create a new role for each org unit. It isn't suitable for me.
    Please, give me advece how to make CRM_ORD_LP work. May be there must be a special way of assigning users to the ogr. structure?
    P.S. I use CRM 5.0

    Hi Manuel,
    I have already investigated this question and read this help-docs.
    As for authorization objects - I use 3: CRM_ORD_OP, CRM_ORD_LP, CRM_OPP - and i don't use object CRM_ORD_OE advisedly as far as i can't afford to do the separate role for each org.unit (I have org.structure with  23 org.units)
    But I noticed an fact that when I tried to change opportunity with my test user, system says that "You have no authorization to execute action Change
    " the reason is "The authorization check for object CRM_ORD_OE has sent back the return code 12. The activity executed was Change. Return code 12:
    There is no authorization for the checked objected in the master record.
    I understand it as the system can't find necessary authorization object CRM_ORD_OE, but may be I'm wrong.
    As for badi - I don't know which badi controls the authorization. Could you prompt me, please?
    And may be you know how it is possible to control the process of checking authorizationg objects during some transaction?
    Regards,
    Ekaterina

  • Inclusion of Authorization Object

    Hi friends,
    I want to include a standars SAP authorization object in a standard transaction type. The authorization object is originally not there in the transaction. Do we need to enhance the standard code for calling the additional authorization check or there is some other way to do this?
    Regards,
    Deb.

    Hi Manuel,
    In Opportunity transaction I want to give authorization to the Text Types. E.g. The person with manager role shall be able to edit all the text types but the person with role Sales Rep should only be able to view it.
    I added the authorization object 'CRM_TXT_ID' to the transaction but i'm still not able to achieve the functionality. Could you guide me how to go ahead regarding this?
    Regards,
    Deb

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to connect java to oracle 9i

    Hi guys , i'm still beginner in oracle ,I've created a database and i need to connect a java application to it ,i mention that i'm using netbeans as IDE (tomcat server is embedded with it),please any help.

  • Word 2011 - Tables Layout button disappeared!

    Hi. Normally when I click on the "Tables" a button in the Ribbon it extends horizontally and allows a new " Tables Layout" button to its right side. This is now not appearing at all. I am highlighting a Word Table nothing nada. Just that up/down "to

  • Photoshop won't load

    I am running a new install of windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit on a quad core 2,4 GHz processor with 4 GB of memory. I have a Ge Force 88oo GTS graphics card with 320 MB of GDDR3 and a further 1800MB of shared graphics memory. I have updated windows &, I ha

  • Why is my USB tethering hanging?

    USB tethering with my iPhone 4S has been working fine until recently but its started to hang on pages every so often (When tethered to my Mac via USB), or refuse to load them at all. But when I go on my phone to try and load the page, it loads instan

  • Calendar permissions keep reverting Exchange 2013

    I am getting a strange problem on my Exchange 2013, this has been migrated from a 2007 Exchange. When a new account is made in ECP we are having issues with setting calendar permissions afterwards, we can make another user have editor permissions but