Authorization object for company code and profit center together
Hi all,
Please help me with the following requirement..
Company Code = ABCD
Profit Center = *
The user is authorized to run the report for company code ABCD only but any profit center within this company code.
2 Company Code = *
Profit Center = WXYZ
The user is authorized to run the report for Profit Center WXYZ only but any company code.
3 Company Code = *
Profit Center = *
The user is authorized to run the report for any company code and profit center.
The same user could have 1 and 2. So, in this case he should be able to run a report for the total inventory of company code ABCD, and a report for total inventory of profit center WXYZ only regardless company code.
He should not have visibility to other company codes inventory other then profit center WXYZ.
Regards,
Raj
Hi ,
Anyone please help me..
Regards,
Raj
Similar Messages
-
Company code and Profit center is not mandatory
Hi,
My requirement is that i wish to make the company code and profit center is not mandatory., ie greyed out. This i want while creating the project. I have assigned the controlling area in the project profile. but when i save the project i am getting the error as " Enter the company code". I made changes in field selction for project definition screen group - both company code and profit center are in display mode. This i did it with regard to Project profile. In project builder screen it is greyed out. but asking for company code.
Is it possible to make it for both? When i tried with Profit center alone, i am not getting any error. Whether company code is mandatory while creating project or anyway can we avoid company code?
Please throw your views
Thanks
SankarHi,
You can try in the following way:
SPRO->Project System->Structures->Operative Structures->WorkBreakdown Structures->UserInterface Settings->
Define Field Selection for WBS:
Step1: Double CLick on "Field Selection: Project Definition"
Step2:Click on "Influencing" button on the Application Tool bar.
Step3:Double click on "Project Profile" line Item
Step4:Against to Contents field- choose the relevent Project Profile (F4 search option) and then enter.
Step5:Now here try to choose Company Code Fieled and make it as "Hide"
Profit Ceneter Field and make it as "Hide".
Step6: Save the changes.
Step7:Check with your Project.
And Pl. let me know the result.
Vemula -
HR - SRM Replication: Issue with company code and cost center
Hello Experts,
We have a scenario where we are trying to replicate the HR Org Structure into the SRM system.
All the standard settings have been made using relevant SAP Notes and other help available on SRM.
However, the company code and cost center for a particular position are not getting updated into SRM.
These details are present in the Inbound Idoc from the ECC system.
Is there any setting we may have missed out on?
Please help.Hi
Kindly check your ALE Filter in BD64 in the sending system. You need to maintain the objects C K O S and infotype 1001 and related subtypes in the filter model.
Also check the Evaluation path that you are using to send data.
Regards
Vijay V -
Sourcing: Shows wrong company code and cost center
Hello
We have implemented SRM4.0 SP8. When we display shopping carts in sourcing cockpit before aggregate to create a PO, we check that SC from different companies doesnt show the correct company code and cost center. We have a central purchase group that aggregates SC from different enterprises. For two SC, the second displays a wrong company code and cost center.
Example:
First SC:
SC -> A123
Company -> SNLL
Cost center > AAA
Second SC:
SC -> A124
Company -> SNPP
Const center -> BBB
When displaying the second SC it shows company code SNLL and Cost center AAA each is incorrect. In DB data is correct for each SC, company code (table BBP_PDBEI) and cost center per item (BBP_PDACC). Even if we aggregate both SC to create one PO, this document has correct data per item (different company code, requester, cost center) the only issue is related with the information showed in ITS/HTML in sourcing cockpit before aggregation.
Do you have any idea how can we resolve this?
Thanks in advanceHi
Seems like a SRM bug.. with the Support pack 8... Try upgrade to latest support pack in SRM system, if possible...
Also Please create a customer OSS message with SAP !!
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul -
: Role Security within Company Code at Profit Center Level
Can someone explain how to restrict GL transaction processing within a company code, below the company code level, at a Divsion / Branch level at the profit center level for ECC6 via user authorizations in FI GL roel security?
Hi,
Create Authorization Objects for the branch/ division containing the User ids and mention in the role.
Thanks
VK -
Authorization Objects for GL, AP, and PCA
Hi,
What is the difference in:
1. Authorization Objects
2. Facility Objects
3. Profit Center Objects
Where can I find the above objects related to:
1. GL
2. AP
3. PCA (Profit Center Accounting)
Please give me the answer, I will assign points to you.
Thanks in advance.Hi,
1) Make the characterstics like Company code, Controlling Area, Proficenter ..etc as authorization relevent (RSA1)
2) Create the Respective Authorization objects for each of the above Characterstics (RSSM).
3) And assign the Cubes and ODS es to the Authorization Object RSSM
4) Create and use the Authorization variables on the above characterstics in reports
5) maitain the access for all users through the roles by including and maintaining the AOs (created in step 2)
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P -
Company code vs profit center in FI
Hi all,
I have a question in restructuring our financial organization in sap. We are one company with one operating concern, one controlling area, one company code and one chart of account. We also have several locations in America. Lately, we have acquired another company with several other locations in America.
There are 2 ways of including the new company when we restructure in sap financial side.
A) Use company code to represent each company.
Thus, under our holding company, we would have our company, new company location A, new company location B, new company location C and one company for real estate purpose for our building. This means 5 new company codes with multiple chart of accounts.
B) Use profit centers to represent each company
Thus, we would have 5 new profit centers.
Both ways work very well for income statement. Option B is a little iffy on Balance Sheet.
Question is: How easy is it to maintain separate Balance Sheet between option A and B ?
What are the pro and cons of both options ?
Have anyone come across this ?
thanks
JoyceHi ,
It is always recommended to go with , 1 co code per seperate legal entity as explained by ajay .
Moreover you can have balance sheet and profit and loss a/c at profit center level with New GL .
Also check on the operational issues like for Eg. depritiation run can be executed at co code level only and not at profit center level just for example . then a question should not come why have we not considered this at the time of org structure finalization .
Secondly , also check on the authorization issues in case of Assets account to be particular as the authorizations work at co code level and at asset class level . so if a requirement comes that profit center wise viewing should happen then you will have to move on to have modifications .
I would suggest that along with your considerations on legal reporting and keeping in mind the operation issues that may crop up take a final call on the same .
Regards ,
Dewang T -
Is there any table for see Authorization object for Function code?
Hi,
I am facing problem in finding autho. object for function code.
My problem is, in tcode cor2 there is function Approval (in Menubar->process order->function->approval), I want to restrict this to some users.
So is there any way or table to see function code's authorization object..
Thanks...Hi ,
I such scenario the best way is to run trace (ST01) and analyse to find used/missing authorization objects.
Regards, -
Authorization object for "set TECO" and "undo TECO"
We want to control the authorization for "set TECO" and "undo TECO",but we can't find relevant Authorization object. Is there any Authorization object for these two functions? If there's no Authorization object for them ,then how can we achieve the same result? Thank you very much!
Hi,
Under one user ID the auth object B_USERSTAT will have the authorization key in which user will be responsible to change the TECO user status.
One user will not have any authorization key under B_USERSTAT Auth_Object.
Hope it's will give you help.
Regards,
Vishal Kr. Sharma -
Authorization Object for Transaction Code
Hi,
Is there a report I can execute to give me the list of authorization object for this transaction code?
Thanks.Check Transaction SU24
Alternatively you can go to SE16-- enter the table name TSTCA, then enter the T CODE, you will get the object related to that T Code.
Reward points.. -
How to process AT END OF command for company code and transaction number.
Hi,
I have report with selection screen with company code and key date. Based ON key date given I should calculate Accrued interest for all transaction with in each company code.
When I run report with one company code it works fine. But when I run with multiple company codes the amounts are messed up.
I am getting all company codes with transaction details in to ITAB1 like this below, and PERFORM get_processdata. has my calculation for interest rate.
SORT itab1 BY company_code transaction.
LOOP AT itab1 INTO wa_tab1.
itab2 = wa_tab1.
APPEND itab2.
AT END OF transaction.
PERFORM get_processdata.
ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
Thank you.Hello,
You need to use AT New event to clear your total variables.
AT New - this will go for first time also but we want to clear variables from second time. it requires flag to stop going it first time
Pseudo code:
clear: flag.
Loop at itab1 to itab2.
At New.
if flag eq c_x.
clear: <total variables>, intenal tables.
move c_x to flag.
endif.
tab2 = wa_tab1.
APPEND itab2.
AT END OF transaction.
PERFORM get_processdata.
ENDAT.
ENDLOOP. -
Authorization objects for Process chain and Data source in BW 3.x
Hi,
Can any one tell me the authorization objects regaring process chain and Data source in BW 3.x versions. I guess we have auth objects for both of them in BW 3.5 that is S_RS_PC AND S_RS_DS .
Can any one help me solving this issue
Thanks
BharatHi bharat
I dont thin these objects are part of 3.0
check from SU03 weather these objects are present in 3.o box
In 7.0 they exist:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/8b/134c3b5710486be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
TO see weather these objects exist:
Go to Tools -> Administration ->User maintenance ->Information System -> Authorization objects -> Authorization objects by Complex Selection Criteria -> By Object Class. For the object class, enter either RS (for Business Information Warehouse objects)
OR
S_BCE_68001413 (Tcode for this rep)
Thanks,
Raj -
Authorization objects for Process chain and Data sources in BW 3.x version
Hi,
Can any one tell me the authorization objects regaring process chain and Data source in BW 3.x versions. I guess we have auth objects for both of them in BW 3.5 that is S_RS_PC AND S_RS_DS .
Can any one help me solving this issue
Thanks
Bharatits the same thread again
/community [original link is broken]
Thanks,
Raj -
Authorization Object for Transaction code XSLT_TOOL
Hi Friends
When i try to use transaction xslt_tool the following error appears "You are not authorized to use transaction xslt_tool".
Can anyone give the Authorization object for transaction xslt_tool,
Regards.
WishvaGive access to the transaction in PFCG.
Then use SU53 to highlight any additional access required. -
Authorization object for FM e.g fund center group/fund center auth group
Hi,
I have a requirement to control the number of fund centers which can be viewed from PSM-FM Budget reports.
Currently, I have included authorization groups into the FM Master data.
However, I am looking to control it at org level instead of at the object level.
Is it possible to control fund center grouping at org level?
regards
DamonHi Damon,
I am not sure if I understood you correctly but your authorization group field (from the master data transaction) should reflect exactly what you want, therefore you should build it according the organization level that you requires.
The field 'Authorization Group', is the same used in the authorization rules. It is not the 'fund center' field itself, is the group that you are grouping the fund centers only for authorization purpose.
If in the table FMFCTR for your FM Area you have the same content for all records to this field, this means that all your funds center will be part of the SAME authorization group.
So, you should consider within your company to divide the authorization groups according your needs and adjust your roles in transaction PFCG accordingly.
I hope this helps you.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can't scan from wireless networked Pixma MP640
I just hooked up a new Canon MP 640 via wireless network through my Airport Extreme. Printing works fine, but when I try to scan to my Macbook the printer can't find it over the network. It will only scan to the Macbook with a direct USB connection.
-
May I import 3 video clips from FCP secuence?
I have in the FCP Timeline a composition of 3 video clips. V1 is video image, V2 a title and V3 is another video image. May export them exactly as they are in the timeline? What I pretend is to work with them in Motion in this order. Is it possible?
-
Intercompany stk transport order process - Billing type determination
Dear All, We are currently dealing one Roll-Out project for one multinational company. In that from sales side, one of the main processes defined is u201CStock Transport Purchase Order processu201D. As a regular process, outbound delivery document al
-
Reg:What are the infotypes mandatory for transfer,pramotion,term Actions
Hi all, I am new for SAP.My client Requirement is actions of transfer,appraisal,promotion,Termination and reassignment.In these actions what r the mandatory infotypes we need to maintain.If any one knows tell me Thanks, Laxmi
-
Hi all, Anyone got Nodes working on 8.0.1 OK? It worked for me on 8.0 but I hadn't tested it under 8.0.1 until today. Main machine: Mac Pro Quad 2.66 GHz 8GB Node machine: Mac Mini Core 2 duo 2 GHz 2GB Both at 10.5.2 Logic 8.0.1 Logic Node 8.0.1 Ethe