Authorization Object - ME21N

I'm making some and user's profile but i'm having a problem with this.
I need to find the authorization object for the field vendor when i make a standard order. i need to restrain this field to make a good end user profile.
I've tried to make trace with ST01, and i've tried to use SU22 to find the authorization object but i didn't find it!
I really need help on this...thx

S_BCE_68001413 (T code) - Authorization Objects by Complex Selection Criteria ,
Enter the following object class to get all the authorization objects for mm.
MM_B       Materials Management: Inventory Management/Phys.Inventory
MM_D       MM: Material Requirements Planning
MM_E        Materials Management: Purchasing
MM_G      Materials Management: Master Data
MM_L       Materials Management - Whse Management (-> split into LE_L)
MM_P      Materials Management - Returnable Packaging Logistics
MM_R      Materials Management - Invoice Verification
MM_S         Materials Management: External Services
MM_W       Materials Management - Valuation and Account Determination
as well check SU24
here enter the transaction code name for which you want authorize and execute..
Edited by: Jayakumar Raju A.S on Aug 10, 2009 7:18 PM

Similar Messages

Error in ME21N : Authorization Object does not match EFB PID

Hello All
In one of our client we are getting the error as "Authorization Object does not match EFB PID" while executing Tcode ME21N. I have checked in User parameters EFB is not maintained but i am not sure if this is the reason for this error. if this is the case then can somebody tell me what value should i enter against EFB in user parameter. i have tried entering X but in Vain.
Also would like to know where one can see EFB parameter value in SPRO.
It is urgent.
regards
Yogesh

Hello Yogesh,
Here is the path:
SPRO --> Material Management > Purchasing > Authorisation Management > Define function authorisations for buyers > function authorisations for buyers
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Authorization object not to allow certain user to enter sloc PO

Dear All,
i have manage to go su21 to create under mm purchasing authorization object called Y_BEST_LOC with Acty and LGORT field. other than that i have insert check item under program RM06ENHI. after that i go to su24 to assign the transaction code check for me21 and me22. under field value for me21, my new object i want to assign value (interval) = $LGORT, but don;t know how so i leave it blank.
Come to user profile i adding this object into the authorization to check, and put in only allow for 0001 and 0002 location. But the user still can save the PO when choose 0004 without error. I want to know missing step that should be done to prevent certain user to order under 0004 storage location.
Kindly suggest and guide me. thanks in advance
Regards
Aishah

ME21/ME21N doesn't even check if the material is extended to the storage location entered in the PO. I don't think what you did is enough to restrict users per storage location, you need to find a user exit or BAdi and do the authorization check in the your custom code
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'Y_BEST_LOC'
         ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '01' "Create
         ID 'LGORT' FIELD '0002'. "Storage Location 0002
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
" User has authorization
ELSE.
message 'Not authorized for storage location' type E
ENDIF.
You may have to use the following Business Add-in (TCode SE18)
ME_CHECK_ALL_ITEMS                    : Run Through Items Again in the Event of Changes in EKKO

Filter Document Type based on Authorization Object

Hello Everyone,
I have a requirement where i was asked to filter the document type based on authorization object M_BEST_BSA in transaction /KCP/2,ME21N, ME22N and ME23N.
When I create or modify a purchase order, I dont want to be lost in choosing the PO type. I want the field EKKO-BSART displays only the values authorized for the user(me).
Thanks a lot

RE is standard for MIRO .This is SAp standard .
Please clarify what u require .
Did you need other RE for example LE for miro doc type in your co code 1130 and miro doc type EE for your co code 1145.
like wise
Edited by: manu m on Jul 13, 2009 7:53 AM

Authorization Object for Account Assignment field

HI all,
We wanted to restrict the users from creation of PO (in ME21N) against the specific Internal Orders (Account assignment KNTTP='F'). So that user can use Internal orders assigned to his Business Area only.
Which authorization object i can use to restrict the user to use specific Internal order during PO creation and change. ??? I tried to check authorization object listed under t code ME21n but none of them restrict Internal order.
Is there any std. object available, if not then what I need to do while creation of customized authorization object (in SU21), how system will call this authorization object in ME21N while using Acc. Assignment u201CFu201D. more detailed answers will be more useful.
Thanks...

Hi frnd...
i think you want to allow all users to use acct. ***. "F",
but you want to stop the user from using ir-relevant internal orders.
For this, i think you can create a "Z" table having fields:
1)User ID - (key field)
2)Internal Orders - (key field)
3)Access.
Make the entries of the users against the internal orders. (if you want any user to access all the internal orders, then make entry (*) in the field access.
While creating GRN check these entries, if the entry exist, let user use that internal order, if not give the error as you are not authorized.
To do all these, you have to use user - exit. which one i dont know...
kindly let me know, if you use any.
njoy SAP...
njoy Lyf...
Regards,
Amit P Hiran

Authorization object for Accout assignment category

Dear all
Can you please suggest a suitable authorization object for account assignment category so that I can control Users using ME21N and ME51N transactions specific to certain account assignment categories using Roles specific to them.
Thank you

HI
The following link will help you.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/f0/ca3a20260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Kind Regards
Chen

How to assign authorization objects to a cube

Hello,
My cube includes 0profit_ctr which is marked as authorization relevant. Still in RSSM my cube is not included in the list of infocubes for an authorization object (zprofit) linked to 0profit_ctr. I'm therefore not able to enable that authorization object for my cube. I have a few ODSs which are included in the list. Why is my cube missing? Is there something I must do to include it, or is it a bug?
When checking the infocube for authorization objects in RSSM this list is empty as well. I don't see any option to add authorization objects in that list.
I have read the following document:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b849e690-0201-0010-9b88-c00cca40736f
I'm using BW 3.5.
Regards,
Christoffer

Hi Christoffer,
In RSSM you will find a button "Update Check Status ( Authorization Objects, Info providers) ". After this update you should find your cube in the list.
Jaya

How to get all authorization objects for a certain authorization profile

Hi ABAP experts,
I have the following problem: for a certain authorization profile of a role (created with transaction PFCG) I would like to get all contained authorization objects: e.g. for the contained object PLOG I would like to know/read all corresponding parameter values.
So:
- where are these values stored (dictionary table)?
- is there already a FM or a report to read all authoriation values for a certain authorization profile?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Oliver

Hi,
check the following it might useful for you:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a92195a9-0b01-0010-909c-f330ea4a585c
if helpful reward points are appreciated

Mass update to FILENAME field in S_DATASET authorization object

We are migrating to a new fileserver with a new hostname, and so I've been asked to update about 1900 instances of the S_DATASET authorization object for the new FILENAME value. I'd like to do this programmatically if possible.
What I've learned so far is that I need to update the value in table USR12, but the value is encoded. When I look at the table in SE16, I do not see the encoded value field. The value does show in UST12, but I'm told this is an unreliable table.
So I'd like to know..
1. How can I look at the value if not in SE16?
2. Is there an API I can use to encode/decode the value? If not, where is the specification on how to build it?
If this is better addressed in a different forum, which one should I try next?
Thanks,
Dan

Hi there,
Okay I started a few tests and made a bit of progress, but am running into the problem that if I don't check the authority first using the FM and want to test what happens when the user is not authorized, then the bugger dumps (as expected and mentioned in the note)...
But the behaviour as you have described:
>
> Path                   Saveflag Fs_noread Fs_nowrite Fs_Brgru
> =============================================================
> *                                 X         X            DUMY
> /temp/FI/..                       X         X            DUMY
> /temp/FI               X                                 FIFI
>
... is correct, and I found something interesting in the F1 on the spth-path field which explains this.
> Caution:
> - If you enter paths generically in the table SPTH, the most precise specification counts.
> - If you select the no-read or no-write fields in the table SPTH, this overrides the authorization group.
So, the DUMY is not needed as the check does not use it in those cases, and "/temp/FI/.." is anyway more specific than "*" so the system would have used it for DUMY anyway. But that is irrelevant... because if the begru field is empty in the FM, then the check is not performed.
So, the only check which is effective to protect the path, is:
Path                   Saveflag Fs_noread Fs_nowrite Fs_Brgru
=============================================================
/temp/FI               X                                           FIFI
... and the "fs_noread" and "fs_nowrite" flags should be understood as "no protectable authority to read" and "no protectable authority to write" and not the activity field which the authority is being checked against. This is coming from the S_DATASET check (which is already known at that time to the function module).
Using these flags, you can leave the entries in the table without having to delete them if you want to turn them off and on temporarily. Perhaps an "active / inactive" switch would have been clearer...
form CHECK_PERMISSION using ISPTH_HEAD type SPTH
                            MODE       type CLIKE
                            SUBRC      type SY-SUBRC.
data: ACTIVITY like AUTHB-ACTVT.
   SUBRC = 0.
   case MODE.
     when 'R'.
          ACTIVITY = '03'.
     when 'W'.
          ACTIVITY = '02'.
     when 'D'.
          ACTIVITY = '02'.
   endcase.
   if ISPTH_HEAD-FS_BRGRU <> SPACE. "Here it is... for BEGRU checks there must be a value...
      authority-check object 'S_PATH'
          id 'FS_BRGRU' field ISPTH_HEAD-FS_BRGRU
          id 'ACTVT'    field ACTIVITY.
       if SY-SUBRC <> 0.
          SUBRC = 3.
       endif.
   endif.
endform.
Cheers,
Julius

Authorization Object is not working when report is modified.

Hi BW Guru's
We have Company Code as Authorization Object .and we have 3 company Codes (xxxx,yyyy,zzzz).where the users under Company code xxxx are not supposed to view company code yyyy,zzzz data etc.
I modified an existing Report and transported to production.But the Authorization Object is not working for that report.The Report is defaultly displaying all the company codes data(xxxx,yyyy) for all the users.But for the other reports its(company code ) is working fine.
What could be the problem?Is theproblem in transporting the objects.But i transported all the objects inluding auhorization object.
Please send me the solution as it is very much urgent.
The solution will be def. awarded with full points.
Regards
Sanjay

hi Sanjay,
please don't post the same question again, check and response back from your previous thread
Re: Authorization Object is not working when report is Modified.
hope this helps.
would be nice if you reward for helpful answers to all of your previous postings, e.g
docs related to RRI

Report to check authorization object used in customized programs

Hi Guys,
An auditor came and he raised a question to us, he asked whether all of our customized transactions and programs are maintained with authorization checks? The question is how can we check what authorization objects are used for our customized programs and transaction codes? The developer did not maintain the objects used for that program in SU24 table. Is there a program or a report to show us all the authorization object used for a customised program or transaction? Example : T-code MIGO we can check in SU24 table for all the authorization object used. How do we check for customized tcodes? Please advise. Thanks!
Edited by: Jarod Tan on Nov 25, 2010 9:42 AM

Note that some programs are built in such a way that no (visible) auth check is necessary, or even desired at all.
To determine the necessity of an auth check, you should check that starting it has an entry point (tcode, rfc, service) which is appropriately restricted. The rest (whether and where and how a further check is evaluated) is entirely dependent to what the program actually does.
Well designed applications generally have centralized functions and methods, and the checks are in there or a "base check" they use.
Others again use the same in UI programming to determine the visibility of functions, to make the application more intuitive for the user. This on it's own is however not a sufficient auth check to rely on.
Code review is an art form!
Cheers,
Julius

Issue on authorization object

hi all,
in me52n transaction, in account assignment tab there is field called costcenter. its field name is kostl and strucutre is cobl. now i have requirement to create an authorization object on this costcenter. that is for example , if i try to make any changes in the cost center field it should allow me to do it. but if some others are using it should not allow them to make any changes. plz let me know the solution how to do step by step. points will be awarded . this is urgent requirement. plz reply fast.
thanking u in advance,
a.srinivas

Hi deniz,
Use this to set up the autherisation object
      AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT '<objectname>'
                      ID 'ID FIELD SY-UNAME.
      IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
        MESSAGE S999 WITH 'You are not Authorised to change entries'.
        EXIT.
      ENDIF.
Inform the Basis team to assign the role only to ur id...so that no other person wil u autherized
Award points if useful
Regards
Gowri

Analysis Authorization Object not working

Hi Gurus,
I m working on BI 7.0, I have created an analysis authorization object zz_div for 0DIVISION characteristic.
For a given report i want a given user to view only data for '32' and '33' 0DIVISION.
I have followed the below steps but still the report shows all data instead of restricted one.
1)RSECADMIN -> Maintenance ->zz_div ->Create
2) Add 0DIVISION in Auth structure , and in details
I     EQ     32
I     EQ     33
3) Add 0TCAIPROV with I     EQ     0SD_C03
4) Add 0TCAACTVT, 0TCAKYFNM, 0TCAVALID, this having details as
I     CP     *
5) Then in User tab -> Assignment -> User -> Change-> Inserted ZZ_DIV-> Save
6) In Query created a Authorization variable(with no input prompt) and restricted 0DIVISION.
Following are the authorization object in that user's Role (Reporting Only)
S_RFC
S_TCODE
S_GUI
S_BDS_D
S_BDS_DS
S_OC_SEND
S_RS_AUTH - only having zz_div
S_RS_COMP
S_RS_COMP1
S_RS_ICUBE
S_RS_RSTT
S_RS_TOOLS
S_RS_PARAM
I have surfed lots of thread for this issue but not getting a solution
Tell me what i m missing in above or any additional setting need before creating analysis authorization
Edited by: Sonal Patel on Apr 18, 2009 8:10 AM

Hi
Thanks a Ton for ur reply
I have checked in SPRO : Analysis Authorization
where the authorization mode is " OLD obsolete Concept With RSR Authorization Objects "
We have to do the same in Production system .Can u please how its going to effect to others authorizations if change it to New Concept
Thanks
Sonal....

Authorization object for running a report in background

Good day experts,
I tried running a report in background, I choose immediately so that it doesn't have to be scheduled. But when I checked it in my own jobs, It remains at scheduled status. When I tried it on my admin account, It works and with status finished. It seems to be an authorization problem. What object could I be missing with my user account? I tried S_TCODE SMX and SP02 but still not working.
Thanks in advance!

Hi karshbax,
What you're looking for is authorization object S_BTCH_JOB. You need authorization for field JOBACTION = RELE.
In future use transaction SU53. It shows last error authorization error, so if this is authorization problem then after try of manual releasing of job you'll find in SU53 precise info what went wrong.
Best Regards
Marcin Cholewczuk

MRS - authorization objects (Multi Resource Scheduling)

Hello,
We are implementing MRS for a customer who does not have proper structural authorizations in place, and they would like to avoid using evaluation paths for the authorization check.
Is there a way to use cost centers to limit user access in MRS? We tried to use cost centers in auth. object MRSS/PB1, but it does not work.
Is it possible to modify the default MRS auth. objects and add some extra auth. fields? Would that auth. check work in planning board?
Is there any other way to limit user access in MRS planning board rather than using evaluation paths?
Thank you
Simon

Hi Simon,
I have checked the authorization objects related to MRSS in SU24 where I can see based on the T code. Did you find a way how to get relevant for SAP MRS only like the Resource Planner etc authorizations he need if you have found something like that please share.
Thank you

Authorization Object - ME21N

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for