Authorization policy in oam11g domain

Hi Guys,
One of our web resources protected with oam (webgate 10g) needs password also for application side authorization,My questions are,
1.Is it possible to set password in session,header or cookie in response of authorization policy of application domain in oam 11g?
OR
2.Is there any way to pass password as encrypted as header,session or cookie to protected web resource with 10g webgate?
Regards,
jdev

check this post:
How application can access OAM protected resource.

Similar Messages

Custom OWSM Authorization Policy Not Visible in OSB 11g

I am trying to configure custom OWSM authorization policies to grant web service access in OSB to userids associated with custom WebLogic groups. Both OSB and SOA are version 11.1.1.5 with an Oracle Enterprise 11g database backend. To help rule out some possible operational errors, here are things that ARE working with the combination of SOA and OSB servcies:
* the underlying SOA service functions in the /em console test page
* the OSB proxy service works from the /sbconsole test page with OWSM oracle/wss_username_token_policy enabled
* the oracle/log_policy can be added to the OSB business service and generates log entries
* the outer proxy service can be successfully invoked from a remote client with no security policies,
with HTTP transport security and authorization policies and with OWSM authentication policies
attached (given the correct request payloads)
These findings would appear to rule out connection errors from the OSB engine to the jdbc/mds/owsm DataSource or proper startup of the "OWSM Policy Support in OSB Initializer Application" service within WebLogic. (By the way, that deploys with a typo in its registered name -- "Aplication" with a single p.)
Here are the steps that were performed:
1) created group myfirmIdentityData in WebLogic console (/console)
2) created userid myappuser in WebLogic console
3) added myappuser to the myfirmIdentityData group in WebLogic console
4) cloned the oracle/component_authorization_permitall Security policy to myfirm/authorize_IdentityData
using the Fusion console (/em on the SOA domain)
5) edied myfirm/authorize_IdentityData to add the "role" myfirmIdentityGroup to the
list of permitted roles (***)
*** note -- "roles" referenced within the OWSM policy configuration dialogs actually correspond to "groups" at the WebLogic Server level. A bit confusing at first but harmless.
6) accessed the SOA service in the Fusion console (/em), clicked on the Policies tab and verified
the myfirm/authorize_IdentityData policy is available for application to the SOA service (BUT DID
NOT ATTACH IT HERE -- I'm trying to attach it at the "outer" layer in OSB, not SOA Suite)
7) accessed the Service Bus console (/sbconsole), started a change session, selected the
proxy service, then clicked on the Policies tab, then clicked the Add button in the
Service Level Policies section
At that point, the only services listed are the factory supplied oracle/********* policies. There are two pages listed and flipping between the two doesn't show any other policies other than the oracle/***** policies.
I even tried stopping and starting the domain thinking maybe OSB caches all of the OWSM policies at startup rather than querying the mds_owsm schema dynamically to no avail. No myfirm/****** policies are displayed after a domain restart.
Any insight?
Thanks.

Once again, I wound up opening a Support Request with the TAC for direction on this issue. The policies were not appearing for assignment to OSB proxy / business services because they were being created against the wrong type of object within OWSM.
In a nutshell, policies in OWSM can be created to be applied against:
* Components --- only usable against SOA services
* Service Endpoints --- against URLs used as access points into services
* Service Clients -- against consumers of services as identified by credentials
* All -- all of the above
However, policies built against Components can only be applied to SOA composite services. When I cloned the existing oracle/component_authorization_permitall Security policy to myfirm/authorize_IdentityData policy then limited it to the myfirmIdentityGroup group, that policy would only be assignable to SOA composities since it applied to only Components.
To allow the group based authorization policy to be enforced in the outer OSB tier, the oracle/binding_authorization_permitall_policy was cloned to myfirm/authorize_IdentityGroup. That policy was defined to apply to endpoints and once saved, appeared in the GUI of the Service Bus console to assign to the proxy service for the service being implemented. A second component policy named myfirm/componentauthorize_IdentityGroup was cloned from oracle/component_authorize_permitall_policy to perform the group authorization at the SOA layer.
A different issue is being encountered configuring the OSB business service to forward the OWSM headers from the outer proxy service to the SOA service so the authorization succeeds at the inner layer but that's a different problem. With the SOA layer authorization policy disabled, client tests to the proxy service function correctly with a userid in the myfirmIdentityGroup group and generate an authorization failure when another client credential is used that does not belong to myfirmIdentityGroup.

ISE authorization policy question

I'm in the process of finishing up my authorization policy and was hoping to get some input on how to deal with freshly imaged machines. The current authorization policy relies on Active Directory (peap-tls) and CCM (eap-tls). Since the newly imaged machines will not be part of the domain yet they'll fail and will either be completely denied access or they'll be dropped into a null vlan.
Would it be viable to create a policy that says if your name starts with the first 5 characters of our naming convention then you can be dumped onto the internal data VLAN and couple that with a DACL permitting access to ports necessary to join the domain?
I'm not sure what type of security implications this would have?
If this is not a suitable route what would be a best practice approach?

You can do the later one if they fail authenticaton , they be granted separated Vlan with some defined access.

How to restrict users working on Windows 7 clients from accessing Windows Explorer and other systems in the network through Group Policy with a domain controller running on Windows Server 2008 r2

Dear All,
We are having an infrastructure setup of around 500 client computers managed through group policy.
Recently the domain controllers have been migrated from Windows Server 2003 to Server 2008 R2.
Since this account requires extremely strict environment, we need to figure the solution for restricting the users from access anything locally.
It would be great if you can assist me with the following query.
How to restrict users logged on Windows 7 clients from accessing Windows Explorer and browsing other systems in the network through Group Policy with a domain controller running on Windows Server 2008 r2 ?
Can we disable Network Tab on the left hand pane ?
explorer.exe is blocked already, but users are able to enter the Windows Explorer by clicking on the name which is visible on the Start Menu.

>   * explorer.exe is blocked already, but users are able to enter the
>    Windows Explorer by clicking on the name which is visible on the
>    Start Menu.
You cannot block explorer.exe when you do not replace the shell - the
desktop you see effectively IS explorer.exe...
Your requirement sounds like you need a custom shell:
http://gpsearch.azurewebsites.net/#2812
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

ISE 1.2 - Authorization Policy for Digital Certificates

Hi Everyone.
I have Cisco Ise 1.2 when I created authorization Policy rule for PEAP(MSCHAPv2) and the ISE can match on the rule e permit based on AuthProfile.
BUT, authentications using digital certificates (EAP_TLS) I can´t do some AuthorizationPolicy for match.
I´m try some:
if
any
AND
authEAPprot: EAP-TLS
AND
Certificate:inssue : iqual : CA-root
THEN
ACCESS_FULL
In Operations>Authetications I can see the authentication and when I open the details, I can see the method is EAP-TLS BUT my rule is not correct cuz authorization policy that use is Default.
Someone can do some Tip about How i can make this rule for authentications that use EAP-TLS (digital certificates)???
tks

Hi,
You will have to upload all certificates (intermediate and root) that are used to sign the client cert into the ISE CA database. You will also have to make sure that checkbox for trust for client authentication is checked.
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

ISE Authorization Policy

Hey guys,
I have a question regarding ISE Authorization Policy. In my test lab, I don't have any wired station, and what I have is a wireless lapotp. I have configured to allow only EAP-TLS authentication. Now, my problem is I keep getting "15039 Rejected per authorization profile."
Under the Policy > Authorization, I created a rule where I just want to allow on EAP-TLS either via machine or user identity, and the bottom is the default DenyAccess. When I tried to join the wireless network, I kept getting denied. I checked the ACL counters on the WLC side and it was not increasing.
I changed the default DenyAccess to PermitAccess, and I was able to join the wireless network no problem, and the ACL counters on the WLC side increased.
It seems like I am hitting the default Authorization Policy first which is on the bottom of the authorization policy.
I attached the failed and authenticated logs that I got from ISE.
Has anyone have encoutered this issue?
The version that I have is 1.1.1
Thanks
P.S.
I went back to check my autorization condition, and it is blank (See the 1st screenshot)

Hi,
it is obvious that you are not matching any condition.
rather than keeping the condition blank, fill it with a condition that is always match and try if that helps.
Regards,
Amjad
Rating useful replies is more useful than saying "Thank you"

Authorization Policy for Modify user in OIM 11gR2

Hi Experts,
Requirement: I want the users in particular org not to modify certain user attributes and users from other org should be allowed to modify user.
I have created user1 whose organization is org1 and role is role1. I have also created user user2 under same org and same role. I assigned the Admin Role "User Administrator" role to user2.
So If user2 from same org1 tries to modify certain attributes then OIM should throw error message. I have completed till this.
But when the user from diff org say org2 with Admin Role "User Administrator" tries to modify user, OIM is not allowing to modify user which should not be the case.
I want the Auth Policy to trigger only for Org1. I have specified the below condition for my custom policy in OES admin console but it is not triggering.
The condition is
IF ( OrclOIMTargetEntity = 'true' AND OrclOIMUserOrganizations = 'true' AND STRING_AT_LEAST_ONE_MEMBER_OF(OrclOIMUserOrganizations,['25','1000000']) = true )
What am I missing?
Any help is much appreciated.

Hi
Can anyone let me know the steps to restrict modify user operation for the users belonging to specific organization in OIM 11gR2. The condition which I specified under Authorization Policy in APM console is not triggering at all.
Thanks!

Authorization Policy

Hi everyone,
I have 400 organization and 400 admins of these organizations.
I want to create authorization policy about 400 organizations and 400 admin (create user, search user etc.)
How can I create quickly these 400 authorization policy ?
Do I have to create manually these 400 authorization policy ?
or
Can I create automatically create by using XML or API ?
thanks.
Regards.

Looks like Oracle did put a Service for it, but did not mention it in the docs.
<bean id="oracle.iam.authzpolicydefn.api.PolicyDefinitionServiceDelegate" class="oracle.iam.authzpolicydefn.api.PolicyDefinitionServiceDelegate" scope="singleton">
<property name="policyDefinitionService" ref="PolicyDefinitionServiceEJB"/>
</bean>
<jee:jndi-lookup id="PolicyDefinitionServiceEJB" jndi-name="ejb.stateless.PolicyDefinitionService#oracle.iam.authzpolicydefn.api.PolicyDefinitionServiceRemote" proxy-interface="oracle.iam.authzpolicydefn.api.PolicyDefinitionServiceExtended" lookup-on-startup="false" cache="false"/>
<bean id="oracle.iam.authzpolicydefn.api.PolicyDefinitionService" class="oracle.iam.authzpolicydefn.impl.PolicyDefinitionServiceImpl" scope="singleton"/>So I will suggest use the PolicyDefinitionService.
-Bikash

Authorization Policy in OAM

Hi All
How can I assign a protect resource in a protected authorization policy to a specific user ?
in the protected authentication policy , the user need to authenticate against LDAP and then he can get in but still denied the access but how can I give him the permission to access the protected authorization resource ?
Thanks

Hi,
Assuming this is OAM 11g: double-click the Authorisation Policy (eg "Protected Resource Policy", in the right-hand pane click the "Constraints" tab and then click the Add button (+ sign). Then you can add an "Allow" constraint of class "Identity", and subsequently add users/groups to that identity. Given that no-one can access the resource after authentication, it looks like you don't have the "Use implied constraints" check box selected.
Regards,
Colin

Authorization Policy for only search users

Hi all,
I need create a custom authorization policy for only search all users in create request. The users can't see any profile information of others users.
Anyone can help me ?
Regards,
Joel

ViewUser Admin Role can search and view users by default. Since the OES policies for this admin role has action as ViewSearch Entity. In your case, you can write EL's to hide Admin tab which will hide Admin ltab links based on current logged-in user profile.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/uicust.htm#BABHBFGH

OIM 11g - User Management Authorization policy issues

Hello,
1) Created an organization -> Human Resource
2) Created an Role -> HR_Admins
3) Assigned HR_Admins roles as administrative role of Human Resource organization
4) Created user1 with organization as Human Resource & Assigned HR_Admins role to this user.
5) Created authorization policy for user management with following selections
Permission -> Create User.
Data Constraints -> Selected "Users that are members of selected Organizations" & selected above Human Resource organization.
Assignment -> HR_Admins role .
now when i log into user1 i am not able to see Administration tab where i can select Create user.
I am working on this issue for couple of days ,but not able to find the solution & have i missed some configurations ?
Thank-You
Rahul Shah

Hi Rahul,
I have tested your scenarion.. with below clause
1) Created an organization -> Human Resource
2) Created an Role -> HR_Admins
3) Assigned HR_Admins roles as administrative role of Human Resource organization
4) Created user1 with organization as Human Resource & Assigned HR_Admins role to this user. : default role All Users
5) Created authorization policy for user management with following selections
Permission -> Create User. :- *"Select ALL"*
Data Constraints -> Selected "Users that are members of selected Organizations" & selected above Human Resource organization.
Assignment -> HR_Admins role .
In data constraints
Organization Security Setting Hierarchy Aware (include all Child Organizations)
Now I am able to see the create user tab and, I can create user in Human Resource org only.
If it doesn't work for you. Just assign "REQUEST ADMINISTRATOR" IN AUTH POLICY. Test the result.
Also what is your OIM version?
Test it with fresh data like new role name, org and user,
-kuldeep
Edited by: Kuldeep on May 22, 2012 4:19 AM

ISE authorization Policy not working

Hi ,
I have configured the ISE as per the belwo link
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/110031/central-web-authentication-cwa-guests-ise
but my authorization policy is not working as when user get connected to guest wlan it get authneticated but when it look for authorization
it going to default policy it should hit on above policy created screen shot as below

What version of ISE + patch are you running?. Could you please send an screenshot of AUTH policies including the default --- > USE part?. Are you using customized portal for the first authentication process?
CWA is pretty straightforward. Only issues I faced was multiple VM (ISE Personas) running on one single server was not replicating properly the AUTHZ policies so I added the PSN persona into the PAN Node and everything worked fine immediately. In addition to that, I realized that I needed at least ONE ENTRY into the ISE PAN Internal Endpoints DB so I could hit the AUTH Policy for MAB & user not found condition which sent me to the AUTHZ = User Unknown + Redirect. Once I authenticated the user using the Default Portal that meant I hit the GUEST FLOW policy. If you are using customized portals for the first authentication process, check: web portal mgmt. --- > Guest --- > MultiPortal Configurations --- > Customized Portal -- > Authentication part.

Regarding Authorization policy and Roles in OIM 11g

Hi,
In OIM 11g Admin interface, is there a way to find out what all authorization polices, a role has been assigned to ?.
I am asking this because, if you search for a user, you will know what all roles he is a member of, and similarly if you search for a role, you will know who all users are members of that role.
Similarly, if you search for a Authorization policy, you will know what are roles are assigned to this policy. But if I search for a role, I am not able to find what all authorization policies has been assigned to this role.
Looking forward to hearing from you,
Many thanks in advance

I understand your concern. But, this feature has not been available
--nayan

Custom Authorization Policy

Hello Experts,
I need to create new custom Authorization Policies, but seems that I can create or copy only Policy from these Entity Type:
- User Management
- Role Management
- Authenticated Self Service User Management
What about the other entity Type? Why I cannot create an Authorization Policy based (for example) on Entity Type 'Scheduler'??
Thanks in Advance and Best Regards
AT

Open an SR and ask Oracle for the 11gR1 unpublished API.
We automate the creationing of an authz policy when we create a group. We were able to receive the API for 11gR1 with the understading that it was unsupported, and with a very strong business case for needing it.
Hope that help.

OIM Authorization policy for specific resource

Hi gurus,
Can we create an authorization policy in OIM 11.1.1.5 for allowing resource administrators to add/modify a specific resource only?
Example: For all users, Admin user-A should be able to add/modify AD resource only.
Admin User-B should be able to add/Modify iPlanet resource only
Thanks in advance.
-J

OIM 11.1.1.5 authorization policies do not extend to resource operations, only operations on OIM users and roles. For restricting operations on resources you can set data object permissions on the resource objects themselves. An alternative approach in OIM 11.1.1.5 is to provision resources via requests, where you can limit requests to work with specific allowed resources and be accessible to specific administrators.

Authorization policy in oam11g domain

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for