Authorized Partners for Release Orders with customer hierarchy

Hello everyone,
      I have created a value contract with order type WK1, in the order type WK1 configuration, choose rule B  for check partner auth. field, namely we want to use
customer hierarchy to detemine the sold-to-party for the follow-up release order. Also I have created the customer hierarchy with hierarchy type A. There are
four levels under this hierarchy, it contains four customer nodes and four customers. Every customer is belong to a customer node. The partner determination
for the customer hierarchy have alredy done, I can see the customer hierarchy "1D" at the partner tab of header in the contract, but when I release the sales
order against  the contract, input a low-level customer number, still got the message "partner X is not authorized to release from contracts.".
     I want to know if I missed some settings in order type configuration or the copy control from WK1 to OR. If this scenario need integrate with  CRM system?  I
have found some related information, just list below:
    Partners in the hierarchy (Rule B)
If the partner who wants to release against the contract is the sold-to party of the contract or at a lower level in customer hierarchy to the sold-to party in the contract, the system accepts the partner as the sold-to party for the release order.
If rule B is defined for the contract type, you can search for authorized partners for a release order using the contract number. Equally, you can search for the relevant contract for a release order using the partner number. In this case, the partner authorization rule is irrelevant.
Prerequisites
If you wish to use group hierarchies other than pricing hierarchies to determine authorized partners, you must have created a hierarchy category and a hierarchy:
To create the hierarchy category, go to Customizing for CRM under Master Data --> Business Partner-->  Business Partner Group Hierarchy. 
To create the group hierarchy, go to the SAP Easy Access Menu and choose Master Data --> Business Partners --> Maintain Group Hierarchy.
Note that you can only create group hierarchies in the SAP GUI and not in the People-Centric user interface.
You must have activated the necessary settings for the sales contract and the release order in the IMG for CRM. For more information, see Transactions ---> Settings for Contracts -->Define Settings for Authorized Partners.
  Thanks!

Hi,
In transcation VTAA at item level have your own cory requirment code which will calcullate net value of the doc, hope this works out
regards
sriky

Similar Messages

  • Table name for sales order with Customer info

    Hi Gurus,
    Could you please provide me table name for  sales order with customer no and customer name.
    I have list of sales order number (more than 1000 no's ) i need to identify customer number and customer name (ship to party and sold to party information). I am running this report every week. so i plan to create sqvi for this report.
    Thanks and regards,
    B.Deethya.

    Hello,
    Access Tables VBAK & VBAP.
    From the above tables you will get Solt to Party & Ship to Party Codes.
    For Customer names you have to pass the Customer Codes to Table - KNA1
    Hope this clarifies.
    Thanks,
    Jignesh Mehta

  • Customize bapi for sales orders with customer fields

    The situation is a following.
    Customer has added a structure on table VBAP. They used Append but without include.
    Now I have to make a BAPI that will be able to write on those fields. I have used several posts and documentation, but with on change : Instead of passing on BAPE_VBAP, BAPE_VBAPX, etc the original structure, i pass another that is an exact copy.
    Could this be the source of the fact that i Dont write anything? The return struct contains tthese :
    ORDER_HEADER_IN has been processed successfully
    return..:                                     
    ITEM_IN has been processed successfully       
    return..:                                     
    But nothing is shown on vbap

    thanks for the reply, but this is something I knew. My problem was whether the structure added to those BAPE_* has to be exaxtly the structure appended to VBAP, or just an identical structure (eg if I appended VBAPEXT to VBAP, should I append VBAPEXT to BAPE_*, or could I use VBAPEXT_copy, which is exactly the same with different name)?
    Anyway, we solved the problem and it seems that we can use an identical structure with same name.

  • Report for Production orders with name of Customers

    Dear Expert,
    Kindly suggest to view the production orders with customer numbers for which the sales orders is created.
    I tried in MB51 with layout settings but the customer number comes out be blank despite the sales order number is populated for an production order.
    Kindly suggst a way or any report in the system  to get the corresponding information of production order number and corresponding customer name mentioned in the sales order .
    Thanks in advance for your help and inputs..
    Best regards,
    Nitish jain

    Nitish,
    MB51 is a Material Document list.  Many production orders exist that have no entries in this report, so it would be an unlikely candidate to be a solution for your requirement..
    The standard production order reporting tool is COOIS.  The output for MTO orders can be configured to display Sales order and Item and Soldto.
    Obviously, displaying even the customer order number in COOIS is impossible in a MTS scenario.
    In addition, a user experienced in using SAP Query  (SQVI or SQ01/SQ02/SQ03) could also create a production order report without having to know ABAP, by properly linking tables AFKO, AUFK, AFPO (production order data) with VBAK (sales order header data) to get customer number, and KNA1 to get customer name..
    If you are not expert in SAP Query, I suggest you discuss this requirement with a local ABAPer.
    If you are feeling like educating yourself in the wonders of SAP query, try this doc.  Although old, SAP query hasn't changed very much since this document was written.
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCSRVQUE/BCSRVQUE.pdf
    Rgds,
    DB49
    Edited by: Dogboy49 on Apr 20, 2010 10:47 PM

  • Creation of Release order with reference to Contract

    Dear experts,
    We are doing upgradation from 4.6B to ECC6. During testing ,while creating release order with reference to contract,(Contract was created with Account assignment category-K and item category-D),cost center is copied from contract in purchase order in account assignment tab of item details,
    but when i save it window is poping up(account assignment service line item 10-small window) asking to enter cost center again. Even if i enter the same cost center in that window,cost center field,again it is asking same window is poping up for entering cost center.
    Can any body please tell me inspite of cost center is copied,why this window is coming ,please suggest.This problem is not there in 4.6B version
    Advance thanks,
    Regards,
    Dayanand

    Please check to OXK1, and compare it to both system.Or check the config guide in IMGMM-Purchasingacc.assigment--Set subscreen for acc assingment (coding) block.

  • How to Generate sales orders with custom Fields using BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI

    Hi,
    I need to generate sales orders with custom fields on table CRMD_ORDERADM_H using BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI, after changing the structure BAPI_TE_CRMD_ORDERADM_H, and feed the  EXTENSIONIN table of the BAPI with data, the order is created, but any value on custom fields.
    After debuging, I saw that the BAPI search for structure conversion in table CRMC_OBJECTS_GEN, but we haven't entry with BAPI_TE_CRMD_ORDERADM_H in this table. is that the problem ?, Is there any way to fix it?
    Best Regards,
    Salah.

    That depends on where do you have the customer fields, check the table CRMD_CUSTOMER_H, if your custom fields are there, you need to use the changing parameter CUSTOMER_HEAD, I guess your already checked that one, right? but there's no custom fields, well...AET/EEWB doesn't enhance the strcuture of the BAPI, so you should do it manually, check the note following note for further details.
    988410 - FAQ: User-defined fields in the BAPI
    If you don't have access to the SAP Marketplace, in resume you should create an append on the structure BAPIBUS20001_CUSTOMER_H and include the following strcutrue CI_EEW_CUSTOMER_H
    Cheers!
    Luis

  • Single invoice for multiple orders with different divisions

    Dear All,
    while I am trying to do single invoice for muliple orders with different divisons invoice is gettting splitted..In copy control vbrk routine I  tried with 003 and 007 etc..but result is same..what configuration need to be done for getting the single invoice
    Thanks In advance
    Regards
    CNRNAIR

    Hello
    single invoice for multiple orders with "different divisions" invoice is getting split
    FYI - Different Division means different Sales Area.
    So, sales doc (whether sales order, Delivery & Billing) is applicable to EXACTLY one sales area.
    Thus, combining docs with different sales area is practically impossible.
    Provided, you are using common division.
    Hope this assist you,
    Thanks & REgards
    JP

  • BAPI For Create Goods Issue for Sales order with picked quantity

    Hi friends,
            Is there any BAPI available to create Goods issue For sales order with picked quantity...............?
    we hv used BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CREATE_SLS
    with sales order .......its creating delivery order but not doing goods issue with piked quantity........

    pls,reply its argent

  • DIServer insert operations for sales orders with error

    DIServer insert operations for sales orders with
    That even though the insert is inserted DocDueDate DocDueDate it says error.
    Subtracting the value of the format 'yyyy-mm-dd', 'yyyy/mm/dd', 'mm-dd-yyyy', 'mm/dd/yyyy' put all reporting
    When the input is entered DocDueDate ShipDate also put together ... but I get an error.
    The error message 'env: Receiver-10Enter due date [ORDR.DocDueDate] 171AddObject2EEE7D98-AB71-464A-93AB-933F0AD3D4DC'
    Purchase order entered into the normal value because the xml is missing or wrong with you.
    Please answer all the possibilities that can be resolved
    This Xml used.
    "<BOM>" +
    "<BO>" +
    "<AdmInfo>" +
    "<Object>oOrders</Object>" +
    "</AdmInfo>" +
    "<QueryParams>" +
    "<DocEntry />" +
    "</QueryParams>" +
    "<Documents>" +
            "<row>" +
            "<DocType>I</DocType>" +
            "<DocDate>2012-01-11</DocDate>" +
            "<DocDueDate>2012-01-11</DocDueDate>" +
            "<CardCode>CD00001</CardCode>" +
            "<Address>Anymode</Address>" +
            "<DocCurrency>KRW</DocCurrency>" +
            "<Comments>[sales orders] LGU TEST</Comments>" +
            "<TaxDate>2012-01-11</TaxDate>" +
            "<JournalMemo>JournalMemo</JournalMemo>" +
            "<Address2>Addr</Address2>" +
            "<BPL_IDAssignedToInvoice>1</BPL_IDAssignedToInvoice>" +
            "</row>" +
    "</Documents>" +
    "<Document_Lines>" +
            "<row>" +
            "<ItemCode>ACDT0100ET</ItemCode>" +
            "<Quantity>1</Quantity>" +
            "<Price>5000</Price>" +
            "<DiscountPercent>10</DiscountPercent>" +
            "<WarehouseCode>A100</WarehouseCode>" +
            "<VatGroup>A2</VatGroup>" +
            "</row>" +
    "</Document_Lines>" +
    "</BO>" +
    "</BOM>";

    I had the same error change the Date to the format yyyymmdd, and problem solved.

  • MM:Release Strategy for Release Order again Approved Contract

    Hi,
    Release strategy for Release Order is required or not against approved contrat??
    As fas as I know once the contract is approved, release order is not required to approve again.
    This is the standard setting from SAP or We need to do some setting for this??
    In my support project I have studied the release procedure and found that, same release strategy and release Group has been used for Purchase Order and Contract.
    Please let me know if anyone have faced this rquirement  or I have to go for Z development for this requirement.
    Thanks you.

    Hi Lalita,
    Thank you for your quick suggestion.
    yes definitely the release stratergy and release group should be set up separately but here both are same
    that is the reason this is  picking of the same release procedure again evenif the contract is approved.
    we have following release characterstic for the release procedure.
    1) Purchasing Group
    2)Total Net Order Value
    3)Order Type
    4)Purchase Organisation
    5)Material Group.
    I think for the above characterstic we must a separater value for PO and Contract but Currently all are merge
    in this only
    But Can you tell me "Release Order should be subjected to release procedure" this is correct or not .
    If yes then what is the base for this, I mean is it working on the concept that " If do relevent
    release characterstic value is found then no release procedure and this is treated as autorelease in sap"
    Thanks you.

  • Automate WM material staging for release order parts.

    Hi all,
    We use LP12 for monitoring WM Material Staging of Release Order parts.Is there a way to automate the process of WM Material Staging for Release Order parts?
    Is there is any Standard SAP Program which can be run in the background or user exit to achieve this?
    Pl suggest
    Regards
    SB

    Hi Arunachalam,
    You can configure WM staging settings in Production Scheduling Profile (OPKP)
    You need to update WM Request field and the available options are:
         No creation of transfer requirements on order release
    X   Only creation of transfer requirements on release
    1   Transfer requirement and transfer order on release
    Hope this will solve your problem.
    Please check and Revert.
    Regards
    Suri

  • Variance calculation for production order with settlement receiver as SDI

    Hi...
    I have one query reference to Variance calculation for production order with settlement receiver as SDI(Sales document item).
    I am working on Varaint configuration with strategy 25(Make-to-order for configurable material) with requirement class 046.
    I have created sales order ref. to configurable material,subsequently created planned order & then converted to production order.
    In production order settlement receiver is SDI(Sales document item).
    While doing production confirmation ,variance has been created.
    Now during variance calculation KKS2, I have got error message as no suitable settlement rule found for object Order no.
    Is there any way to come out of this?Or variance calculation KKS2 is not applicable with settlement receiver as SDI(Sales document item).
    Pl. guide
    Redards
    Tushar

    Hi
    In case of non valuated material, concept of variance does not apply...
    Variance is Actual Cost - Cost of Goods receipt posted in stock.. If the later value is zero, your entire actual cost is variance... That is one way of saying it
    But, in SAP, var not calculated in case of non valuated material and that makes sense as well.. Since you are in MTO scenario, it would make sense to analyse costs vs revenues @ sale order level as each SO will be unique in itself
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • WIP calculation for Prod.order with status DLV

    Dear experts,
    Is there any way to change WIP calculation method for Prod.order status ?
    In t-code OKGC:: By default system will set:
    Order status      Status number         RA type
    REL                          2                             WIP Calculation on Basis of Actual Costs
    DLV                          3                            Cancel Data of WIP Calculation and Results Ana
    PREL                  1                            WIP Calculation on Basis of Actual Costs
    TECO                  4                            Cancel Data of WIP Calculation and Results Ana
    I can not change any thing in t-code OKGC (gray after insert: CO, RA version, RA key).
    As I understanding: Prod.order with status DLV will not be considered to calculate WIP.
    But I want to calculate WIP for Prod.order with status DLV. Could you pls guide me how to configure the system?
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    I suppose it is positive variance as the yield from the order is 10 pieces more than the planned quantity of 1000 and it is always a variance and no WIP involved in this case. It can be settled to FI/PCA and to CO-PA by variance categories (if you have configured accordingly)
    Therefore the accounting entry would be:
    1. Delivery to stock of 10 pieces:
    FG Debit
    Change in Stock Credit
    2. Variances will post the difference:
    Change in Stock Debit
    Price Difference is Credit
    Concerning the valuation method it needs to be tested before it can be implemented.
    Kind Regards
    Umapathi G

  • WIP calculation for Prod.order with status TECO

    Hello all.
    My question is the similar to WIP calculation for Prod.order with status DLV
    But I need that
    - if the Production order has status TECO - the system calculate WIP
    - if the Production order has status DLV u2013 the system settle the order.
    1.     I try to change u201CStatus Numberu201D in TCODE OKGC. But I have receive two different result:
    - if I change u201CStatus Numberu201D for status DLV from 3 to 2, then during WIP calculation of the order with status DLV u2013 WIP have been calculated.
    - but if I change u201CStatus Numberu201D for status TECO from 4 to 2, then during WIP calculation of the order with status TECO u2013 WIP have been CANSELED.
    2.     I try to change results analysis key for status TECO from u201CZu201D to u201CFu201D in TCODE OKG3. BUT during WIP calculation the system create error message KJ 363 which require that results analysis key must be change to u201CZu201D
    How can I resolve my problem?

    Hi,
    I don't have the answer if the requirement is that even after producing the materials, till the time accountant checks the order and does this action, it should remain in WIP. Honestly it doesn't make any sense to me or i have not understood this problem. Anyways as per my current understanding I can suggest the following process for your scenario.
    Once production is stopped in between the process, the order should be in PDLV status (partial confirmations happened in the order)
    Now go and clear the reservations manually from the production order .( delete the component line items from the order). Now depending on whether you are following WIP at actual cost, system will post the difference between credit and debit of that production order as WIP for the month end process.
    Once Accountant okays the entries in the production order, he can do the TECO and settle the order. Now WIP will be reversed and variance will be posted.
    To avoid the already produced goods mixing up with your other stock, u might want use Quality Management with the help of your PP consultant.
    Best Regards
    Vimal

  • Rebate agreement with customer hierarchy

    Hi,
    I want to use customer hierarchy for customer rebates where in the accrual rate with scales shall be maintained only the high level customer. Invoice values of all the subordinate customers should e accrued using this rebate agreement.
    Have learnt about extended rebate agreement functionality wherein such a scenario can be adopted.
    Looking for a solution immediately to meet the week end deadline for POC.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Mohapatra

    Thanks Veera !!
    In this case my rebate receiptant is one only.
    I am trying to use a customer hierarchy node (scaled down customer code w/o partners, recon account etc.) and made it relevant for Rebates & Price determination.
    All the customers in the hierarchy are also relevant for Rebates.
    But the condition record maintained with hierarchy node is not getting picked up the billing document as system is looking for the subordinate payer instead of the hierarchy node.
    Not using the same node as Rebate Receiptant.  Incase of using wrt the below link, am getting error as "Customer for function PY may not have account group 0012".
    Ref : http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ides/helpdata/en/5d/363ec3583f11d2a5b70060087d1f3b/content.htm
    Regards,
    Rajesh Mohapatra

Maybe you are looking for