Auto create final assembly orders

when autocreate final assembly order is run for configured item its creating work order for parent assembly only.
its not creating work order for sub assemblies involved in that parent assembly.
even after setting in BOM parameters,
create lower level supply: auto create configuration items and ATO items.
then, how to solve this issue.
any setups missing?

Hi,
the supply for lower level assemblies is done only if the lower level assemblies are ATO. I am not sure of which value is set for create lower level supply parameter. Did you set for Autocreated items and ATO Items?
regards

Similar Messages

  • AutoCreate Final Assembly Orders - Pre-requisite setup details needed

    Hi ,
    I am a technical person and bit new to  WIP module but to my understanding when AutoCreate Final Assembly Orders program runs, it creates a WO and also Requisition.
    I was doing few test and found that for some sales order it is creating WO but not requisition i.e. I don't see Requisition Import being called by AutoCreate Final Assembly Orders program.
    Can you please provide me what is the setup or pre-requisite for the AutoCreate Final Assembly Orders program to generate Requisition?
    Thanks,
    SM

    [email protected] wrote:
    [SOLVED]
    There seems to be an issue with partitioning a swap partition as "swap" (wtf?) when using dm-crypt/Swap encryption.  This is odd to me since reportedly systemd processes crypttab before fstab, but maybe it looks at the drives first before looking at either table file and then assumes all swaps are not encrypted and just mounts the standard unencrypted swap essentially reserving the partition so that dm-crypt can't access it - would be nice if systemd didn't do that, maybe not logically possible?  Or, time for a new partition type, encrypted-swap?  Anyway, I digress and notice that now my encrypted swap works as expected but still shows a partition type of "unknown"which feels like a hack.
    So the solution:
    sudo cryptsetup luksDump /dev/sdaX
    Then follow the steps from the "dm-crypt/Swap encryption" wiki.  Aside from long term solutions maybe this could be added to that wiki article?
    thanks!
    b1k
    Had more time to play with this.  The "cryptsetup" command isn't necissary.  While this effectively "fixed" my swap partition that was partitioned as a "swap" partition - all that one needs to do is partition their swap as anything BUT swap.  So maybe a quick blurb mentioning that in the "dm-crypt/Swap encryption" wiki article will save another noob a couple hours.  It is sorta mentioned in the "Swap (Activation by systemd)" wiki article but it's hard to understand what the author was trying to convey (after re-reading I'm still not sure what problem the author is solving exactly).

  • Need to run AutoCreate FInal Assembly Orders for a Set of Orders

    Hi All,
    I Need to run AutoCreate FInal Assembly Orders for a Set of Orders, It can run for a Org or for a Single Order.
    How to Run it for set of Orders or Batch of orders.
    Thanks & Regards

    There is no seeded way to do this.
    At one client, we ended up creating a wrapper that accepted more parameters; built a order header cursor and calling the AutoCreate FA Orders for each order.
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Settlement rule auto created in Production Order with Receiver Type as OIT

    Hi,
    I am creating a production order with material number in CO01. The system is automatically putting OIT in receiver category, in settlement rule.
    And its populating the child materials there. I expect the parent material to be populated in the settlement receiver.
    In the settlement profile maintained in order type, I have maitained MAT.
    Please let me know, why system is autopopulating the role like above.
    Regards
    SR

    Hi,
    If you are going to settle the production order to Material, there is no need to enter Allocation structure in Settlement profile unless its used for variance settlement...
    Allocation structure has an option to settle to OIT with a settlement cost element or primary cost element...which is why i wanted you to check for that.
    Anyways, Follow the thread, this should help you
    Change the Settlement Rule
    Thx
    PG

  • Auto Create service order from incoming email

    Hi,
    We have a requirement that we want to create service order with a default transaction type automatically from an incoming email. Also we want to route this service order to a specific service group on creation an above.
    How can we handle this? I know we can create a rule policy with an action to auto create a service order. My question is how do we set up that this service order is of a particular transaction type and has the default routing to the specific service group..
    Thanks
    Dan

    Hello Dan,
    You can specify the transaction type (for ERMS auto-created Service Orders/Tickets) via IMG configuration. In transaction CRMC_ERMS_SM_PROF you select the DEFAULT service manager profile and open the folder "Indirectly Called Services". Then you can specify the transaction type for each of the relevant service IDs: AH_CREATE_SO and AH_CREATE_SR.
    Best regards,
    John

  • Sales order to automatically create assembly order

    Hi one and all,
    How to set up a system to be able to choose materail requriment transferred from sales order to automatically create an assembly order, a planned order, and a process order?

    Hi,
    Assigh the repective Planning startegy group at MRP view of material Master.
    81 - Assembly porcessing for planned order
    82 -  Assembly porcessing for production  order.
    86 - Assembly porcessing for Process  order
    Try with this and crate Sale order.
    Regards
    PradeeP

  • Question -  how i can prevent assembly order rescheduling when in VA02 ?

    Hi                                             ( ECC 6.0)
    I am working with assembly orders.  In sales order create - the system creates an assembly order - requirements type = dynamic order.
    If i amend the sales order a few days later - the system reschedules the assembly order - even when the assembly order is started and has status REL = released.  I get error CO061 - start date in past.. as the system first backwards reschedules and then reschedules forwards.
    Question -  any ideas how i can prevent assembly order rescheduling when in sales order change VA02 ? I need the system  to check the production order status and if = REL then prevent the rescheduling.  Putting a change block on the production order does not work as it ultimately breaks the link between sales:assembly order.
    I am thinking i need to use an SD user exit to read the assembly order and prevent order changes if the assembly order is = REL.
    thanks in advance
    Graham.

    Hi Ram
    We are using dynamic link.  My original solution was to set the 'nochange' on release- however if the sales order qty changed - or the dates changed - or indeed any ATP check was performed - the link was sometimes lost - dependant on user keystrokes.  VA02 still calls assembly order change in this scenario - and the user gets the mesage that no change is present - and ATP returns 0 qty.
    What I think i can use is user exit  EXIT_SAPLCOEXT_001 in conjunction with a user status.  I plant to set the status 'block' on release - although configure it to have no action.  In the user exit - called in the interface between sales / assembly order - I plan to check the assembly order for this status and set the error condition if the status is set.  In debug mode - setting the eror manually - this appears to work as the system never calls assembly order change and accepts the assembly order date/qty as 'supply' in the atp check.
    thanks for you assistance.
    regards
    Graham

  • Message V1748.You cannot select assembly order 1440363 for deletion.

    Dear Friends,
    I am getting the above error while rejecting a line item for sales order.
    Diagnosis says:
    Due to the current situation of the document, the system has attempted to mark the procurement element 1440363 with a deletion flag.
    This could, however, not be carried out, as the procurement element was in a state that does not allow the deletion flag to be set.
    I am unable to handle it.
    Please guide me in this regard.
    Regards,
    Srinivas

    Let me ask you this: Is the assembly order 16600192 your VA02 order number? If not, your sales order item might have created an assembly order (with this number). Depending on its status, you may not be able to delete the assembly order and therefore the sales order item deletion is not possible.
    Verify the assembly order status.
    Good luck!

  • Error:(in tcodeVA02)"You cannot select assembly order 16600192 for deletion

    when i am trying to delete one line item from sales order using VA02 tcode its throwing error "You cannot select assembly order 16600192 for deletion".
    could you tell me please what might be the reason and how to resolve this issue.
    waiting for your response.
    thanks,
    aritra
    Message was edited by: Aritra Samanta
    Message was edited by: Aritra Samanta

    Let me ask you this: Is the assembly order 16600192 your VA02 order number? If not, your sales order item might have created an assembly order (with this number). Depending on its status, you may not be able to delete the assembly order and therefore the sales order item deletion is not possible.
    Verify the assembly order status.
    Good luck!

  • "Assembly order - avalability check"

    Hi Guys
    When creating an assembly order - VA01 for a material with a BOM,
    availabilty check takes place automatically and shows all items as missing.
    How ever I checked plant and SLoc there is enough unristricted stock for all materials.
    Is there any reason for this?

    Bharat,
    Please do following. I had similar issue with static assembly orders. Refer SAP note 80891.
    In Transaction OVB5 ( VOFM) (Maintain: Requirements & Formulas), choose the menu options "Requirements -> Subsequent functions -> Purch.req./assembly".
    The system displays the change view of table TVFO with the following entries:
    RNo  Requirement          SyRoutine     System requir.
    102   PReq                  2           System: BANF
    105   Assembly              5           System: Assembly
    106   Block construction     0
    Remove requirement 105 (replace it with blanks) for processing the subsequent function "Assembly".
    Note: Requirement 106 is an identical copy of requirement 105. It contains the credit status check. The line refers to the subsequent fucntion "Set or remove construction block".
    After this change, the reference of the sales order to the production order is retained even if the credit status is changed, and in production order, the system status ASSB (assembly lock indicator, ISTAT=I0341) is set or deleted depending on the result of the credit check. The production order has no deletion flag and no new production order is created after a later credit release.
    thanks,
    Ram

  • Auto-create delivery for multiple sales orders

    I would like to ask how to create auto-create 'single' delivery
    for multiple sales order during release sales order in R11i.
    It is found in my example during release sales order, multiple
    sales orders fulfill release sales order criteria, a single pick
    slip is generated but it is found that each sales order have
    individual delivery with it. It will casue multiple pack slips
    for a singles pick slip. Is it normal feature for auto-create
    delivery, or any setup to solve it?
    Thanks in advance.

    Am not able to do Single Delivery for Muktiple sales orders
    Have you searched the forum for this question as to why you were not able to generate ??  It could be due to multiple reasons.  Please search the forum and update here what steps you have taken after taking the inputs from here, if the problem is still not resolved.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Transfer Order auto create for Posting Change not working

    Hello Gurus -
    When we release an inspection lot from "Q" status, it creates a posting change notice, and we have it configured to create a TO in the background to the same bin, and auto confirm.  The desired and intended result is to take something from "Q" status to unrestricted status, while keeping it in the same bin - and avoiding the user having to deal with the transfer orders.  Essentially it is seamless and all in the background, the user just sees that he has changed something from quality status to unrestricted.
    It works fine when the entire quantity is selected for the usage decision, but when a partial usage decision is made, the transfer order does not create - and requires processing in LU04 for the posting change.
    Why would this work for an entire qty, but not work for a partial qty - and simply require someone to go in to LU04 and hit "create transfer order" - with no additional information?
    Any help would be most appreciated.  Does it have something to do with a setting of quants?

    Hi,
    In case of a usage decision for a partial quantity, it is not possible to create the Transfer Order for the generated posting change notice automatically. This is only possible when the full quantity is released. The same happens if you release a partial quantity and post the rest to blocked stock or scrap. The reason is, there needs to be a user decision, which part of the quantity has to be posted, this is necessary for example when the quantity is distributed in the warehouse over many storage bins. But even if the full quantity is on one storage bin, there is no automatic TO creation. You can see this also in the online
    processing (LT05), in case of partial quantities you have to enter the selected quantity in the quant list, for a full posting this is not necessary.
    Hope this helps,
    Sinéad Curran

  • Converting contract to sales order does not auto create schedule lines

    Hi
    When I convert quotation to sales order, then schedule lines get auto created.
    But when I convert contract to sales order, then schedule lines don't be auto created. Instead, a confirmation screen for proposal delivery date pops up for every line item in the sales order.
    Is there any suggestion how can I solve my problem ?
    Thanks..

    Hi,
    In standard SD module, system checks availability for each line item, gives you popup screen of confirmation.
    If you don't want availability or popuscreen of confirmation,then
    Go to VOV6 >>> Select schedule line which you are using in sales order for line item >>> Remove tick mark of availability check.
    Else
    Remove availability check rule from material master >>> Under tab Sales : ganral/plant
    kapil

  • Budget control in project WBS'e  while creating the auto PR from Sale order

    Hi experts,
    we are creating the auto pr from sales order for trading process with budget wbs element. but commitment is not posted in project wbs were as pr is created through sale order
    pls suggest if any additional setting is required  to post commitment while creating auto pr from sale order.
    rgds
    rajesh

    Check account assignement categories in SD for PR creation and See if you can make PR to be created with WBS as account assignement like we do in OPTT.

  • Error-M2O-Settlement rule for assembly order for item...could not be genera

    Hi,
    When I am creating Sales Order (VA01) for M2O, I am able to do the costing and copy the EK02 condition type. I have verified the the incompletion log, it indicates that document is complete.
    But while saving the sales order, the below error message is displaed:
    Settlement rule for assembly order for item 000010 could not be generated. Should the order still be saved?
                    Yes/No
    1. If No is choosen the following error message is displayed
           Error when processing Production order
          Error when processing Production order
          Message no. V1380
          Diagnosis
            A technical error has occurred. On calling up the assembly interface, exception 5 was triggered. The exceptions have the  following meanings:
    1 = External block,  2 = General error,  3 = Insufficient data for the interface,  4 = Order was not found, 5 = Update has been rejected, 6 = Final document number for Production order is not issued.  Procedure: Inform your system administrator.
    2. If Yes is choosen, it is creating Production Order without settlement rule. Able to perform GI & Gr. If I try to enter settelement rule (Settlement receiver SDI - Sales document item) in production order (CO02), the belwo error message is displayed
    "Distribution rule for Sales document item can only be created automatically Message no. KD063"
    We are using the requierement class with below details:
    Reqmts class: ZSO- for M2O
    AAC = E, Valuation = A, Settlement profile =SD1, RAKey = 000004, Assembly type = 3.
    Settlement profile contain:
    Allocation structure, PA structure, Default object type = SDI. Valid receivers: Optional -Sales Order / Prof. seg.
    If I make the Valuation field as blank in Reqmts class, there is no error while creating Sales order. And also Settelemnt rule with sales document item as receiver is successfully creating for the production order. Since the Valuation is blank in requirement class, it is Non valuated Sales order stock. All GIs & GR are non valuated
    The business requirement is it should be valuated sales order stock and the production varinaces has to be settled to Sales order. Then Sales order has to be settled to COPA.
    Need your valuable inputs to meet this requirement.
    Let me know if you need any further details.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    ADI

    Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
    What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

Maybe you are looking for