Auto power-on for MacMini with WinXp

Anyone know how to enable auto restart on an Intel Mini running WinXp (bootcamp).
I would like to use the MacMini as media center for some project. The machine must run WinXP. If there's a power failure, I want the Mini to auto power-on again by itself once the power supply recover.
The problem I'm facing now is the EFI. Most auto-restart feature in WinXp only works on BIOS.

You should probably post your question in the Boot Camp discussions:
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1165

Similar Messages

Auto power supply for Zen Xtra 40

Just bought a Zen Xtra 40GB and can't seem to find an auto cigarette lighter type power adapter for it. Does one even exist?
Thanks.
ub52

Ub52,
The power adaptor is located here:
http://us.creative.com/products/prod...7&product=0768
It is back is stock and available.
Jeremy

SP12: Auto-provisioning failed for role with action "keep"

Hi,
If you want to keep an exisiting role for a user in CUP. It wasn't possible to change the validity of the role. Therefor you have to set parameter 145 value to 1 in database table VIRSA_AE_ERMCONFIG and refresh cache in CUP(solution with SP11).
But know we have problemes with the auto-provisioning.
We can enter the other validity of the role and after that the request provisioning failed. In our workflow the request rerouted to the admin because of escape-route settings. All other new roles in the request are assigned well to the user in the backend system.
Any ideas?
Many thanks,
Alexa

Hi,
we actually have the same Problem, that changes to the role validity with action "keep" are not provisioned to the SAP system.
If it is only possible to change the validity with the action "add" it is not possible to limit the validity of a previously unlimited role. Because as you said another role with the new validity dates is simply added to the existing roles.
The only workaround would be to delete the old role and add a new one with new validity dates. But in my opinion this workaround is not acceptable for the users.
Best Regards
Jonas

Swapping power supply for one with a higher wattage?

Hi
I need to replace the power supply in my Quicksilver 733MHz. Can I replace it with one from a MDD 1.25GHz? The MDD has a higher max wattage rating but does this make any real difference? I think the Quicksilver is 344W and the MDD is 360W.
Thanks

Hi-
No, the MDD PSU won't fit or work.
There really isn't much need for a higher wattage PSU in the QS.
If you really want one, convert the wiring on an ATX PSU.
http://atxg4.com/quicksilver.html

Auto power adapters

Is there a source for DC auto power adapters for the MacBook?

Check here , MacBook Magsafe AC/DC car adapter , for what your looking for.

Auto power on with 29P1300VM

Hi guys,
Currently having problem with the 29P1300VM tv. I using a timer to turn the tv on and off. I set the timer to turn on at 8am and turn on at 6pm. The problem is, at 8am when power is on, the tv will not auto power on. It goes into standby mode where I will have to use the remote control to power on or press the power button on the control panel only it will on.
Is there a way the tv will auto on when the power is on?

That doesn't appear to be a US model, and this is the forums for Toshiba USA. You may want to contact Toshiba in your region.
- Peter

Error Message while trying to burn a DVD-R with my MacBook Pro: "The disc can't be burned, because the device failed to calibrate the laser power level for this media.

While using my Mac OS X Version 10.6.8 to burn a DVD-R I keep getting the error message: "This disc can't be burned, because the device failed to calibrate the laser power level for this media."
So, I tried the iDVD and got the same error message.
Can anyone out there help me? I've tried both a DVD - R, and a CD.
I made a short 2:20 minute presentation from iMovie and used the "share" to iDVD, then to iTunes, then I tried exporting it to Quicktime and saved it on my desk top. That is when I tried burning by opening the blank DVD-R in the finder then draging the movie on to it and selecting the burn option. Thank you for your time in helping me with this frustrating problem.
Peace, Pyxidis

I have had that same problem, but it was unrelated to any upgrade.
In my case the optical drive was simply failing, and I replaced it - it was a Powerbook, about eight years old.
It is possible that it's unrelated to Lion, as unlikely as this may seem, since you've just upgraded.
Optical drives seem to be the most life-limited component in these computers. The laser just seems to get weak with age.

I am moving to the uk from oz and was wondering do i have to replace the whole power cable for my mac book 15inch pro....or can i just replace the actual plug in the wall part ..if i can what is this called as when i look on line it just comes up with the

i am moving to the uk from oz and was wondering do i have to replace the whole power cable for my mac book 15inch pro....or can i just replace the actual plug in the wall part ..if i can what is this called as when i look on line it just comes up with the complete power unit...it seems odd that you have to buy the whole unit again...thanks.matthew

All you need is a plug adaptor, if required. Apple sells an adapter kit:
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB974ZM/B?fnode=MTY1NDEwMQ&mco=MTA4NDE3MDQ

Auto-indexing is slow for arrays with 1 dimensions

Hi,
I was looking at the performance of operations on all individual elements in 3D arrays, especially the difference between auto-indexing (left image) and manual-indexing (right image, calling "Index array" and "Replace array subset" in the innermost loop). I'm a bit puzzled by the results and post it here for discussion and hopefully somebody's benefit in the future.
Left: auto-indexing; right: manual-indexing
In the tests I added a different random number to all individual elements in a 3D array. I found that auto-indexing is 1.2 to 1.5 times slower than manual-indexing. I also found that the performance of auto-indexing is much more dependent on the size the dimensions: an array with 1000x200x40 elements is 20% slower than an array with 1000x40x200 elements. For manual-indexing there is hardly any difference. The detailed results can be found at the end of this post.
I was under the impression that auto-indexing was the preferred method for this kind of operation: it achieves exactly the same result and it is much clearer in the block diagram. I also expected that auto-indexing would have been optimized in LabView, but the the tests show this is clearly not the case.
What is auto-indexing doing?
With two tests I looked at how auto-index works.
First, I looked if auto-indexing reorganizes the data in an inefficient way. To do this I made a method "fake-auto-indexing" which calls "Array subset" and "Reshape array" (or "Index array" for a 1D-array) when it enters _every_ loop and calls "Replace array subset" when exiting _every_ loop (as opposed to manual-indexing, where I do this only in the inner loop). I replicated this in a test (calling it fake-auto-indexing) and found that the performance is very similar to auto-indexing, especially looking at the trend for the different array lengths.
Fake-auto-indexing
Second, I looked if Locality of reference (how the 3D array is stored in memory and how efficiently you can iterate over that) may be an issue. Auto-indexing loops over pages-rows-columns (i.e. pages in the outer for-loop, rows in the middle for-loop, columns in the inner for-loop). This can't be changed for auto-indexing, but I did change it for manual and fake-indexing. The performance of manual-indexing is now similar to auto-indexing, except for two cases that I can't explain. Fake-auto-indexing performs way worse in all cases.
It seems that the performance problem with auto-indexing is due to inefficient data organization.
Other tests
I did the same tests for 1D and 2D arrays. For 1D arrays the three methods perform identical. For 2D arrays auto-indexing is 15% slower than manual-indexing, while fake-auto-indexing is 8% slower than manual-indexing. I find it interesting that auto-indexing is the slowest of the three methods.
Finally, I tested the performance of operating on entire columns (instead of every single element) of a 3D array. In all cases it is a lot faster than iterating over individual elements. Auto-indexing is more than 1.8 to 3.4 times slower than manual-indexing, while fake-auto-indexing is about 1.5 to 2.7 times slower. Because of the number of iterations that has to be done, the effect of the size of the column is important: an array with 1000x200x40 elements is in all cases much slower than an array with 1000x40x200 elements.
Discussion & conclusions
In all the cases I tested, auto-indexing is significantly slower than manual-indexing. Because auto-indexing is the standard way of indexing arrays in LabView I expected the method to be highly optimized. Judging by the tests I did, that is not the case. I find this puzzling.
Does anybody know any best practices when it comes to working with >1D arrays? It seems there is a lack of documentation about the performance, surprising given the significant differences I found.
It is of course possible that I made mistakes. I tried to keep the code as straightforward as possible to minimize that risk. Still, I hope somebody can double-check the work I did.
Results
I ran the tests on a computer with a i5-4570 @ 3.20 GHz processor (4 cores, but only 1 is used), 8 GB RAM running Windows 7 64-bit and LabView 2013 32-bit. The tests were averaged 10 times. The results are in milliseconds.
3D-arrays, iterate pages-rows-columns
pages x rows x cols : auto    manual fake
   40 x 200 x 1000 : 268.9   202.0   268.8
   40 x 1000 x 200 : 276.9   204.1   263.8
200 x   40 x 1000 : 264.6   202.8   260.6
200 x 1000 x   40 : 306.9   205.0   300.0
1000 x   40 x 200 : 253.7   203.1   259.3
1000 x 200 x   40 : 307.2   206.2   288.5
100 x 100 x 100 : 36.2    25.7    33.9
3D-arrays, iterate columns-rows-pages
pages x rows x cols : manual fake
   40 x 200 x 1000 : 277.6   457
   40 x 1000 x 200 : 291.6   461.5
200 x   40 x 1000 : 277.4   431.9
200 x 1000 x   40 : 452.5   572.1
1000 x   40 x 200 : 298.1   460.4
1000 x 200 x   40 : 460.5   583.8
100 x 100 x 100 : 31.7    51.9
2D-arrays, iterate rows-columns
rows x cols : auto     manual   fake
200 x 20000 : 123.5    106.1    113.2
20000 x   200 : 119.5    106.1    115.0
10000 x 10000 : 3080.25 2659.65 2835.1
1D-arrays, iterate over columns
cols   : auto manual fake
500000 : 11.5 11.8    11.6
3D-arrays, iterate pages-rows, operate on columns
pages x rows x cols : auto    manual fake
   40 x 200 x 1000 : 83.9   23.3     62.9
   40 x 1000 x 200 : 89.6   31.9     69.0
200 x   40 x 1000 : 74.3   27.6     62.2
200 x 1000 x   40 : 135.6   76.2    107.1
1000 x   40 x 200 : 75.3   31.2     68.6
1000 x 200 x   40 : 133.6   71.7    108.7
100 x 100 x 100 : 13.0    5.4      9.9
VI's
I attached the VI's I used for testing. "ND_add_random_number.vi" (where N is 1, 2 or 3) is where all the action happens, taking a selector with a method and an array with the N dimensions as input. It returns the result and time in milliseconds. Using "ND_add_random_number_automated_test.vi" I run this for a few different situations (auto/manual/fake-indexing, interchanging the dimensions). The VI's starting with "3D_locality_" are used for the locality tests. The VI's starting with "3D_norows_" are used for the iterations over pages and columns only.
Attachments:
3D_arrays_2.zip ‏222 KB

Robert,
the copy-thing is not specific for auto-indexing. It is common for all tunnels. A tunnel is first of all a unique data space.
This sounds hard, but there is an optimization in the compiler trying to reduce the number of copies the VI will create. This optimization is called "in-placeness".
The in-placeness algorithm checks, if the wire passing data to the is connected to anything else ("branch"). If there is no other connection then the tunnel, chance is high that the tunnel won't create an additional copy.
Speaking of loops, tunnels always copies. The in-placeness algorithm cannot opt that out.
You can do a small test to elaborate on this: Simply wire "0" (or anything less than the array sizy of the input array) to the 'N' terminal.......
Norbert
PS: Auto-indexing is perfect for a "by element" operation of analysis without modification of the element in the array. If you want to modify values, use shift registers and Replace Array Subset.
CEO: What exactly is stopping us from doing this?
Expert: Geometry
Marketing Manager: Just ignore it.

I like the idea of auto back-up for my new iMac, Ipad and PC Netbook, particularly if I can access all files and data stored on any device. But I have a Conceptronic router. Will Time Capsule work with this and how?

I like the idea of auto back-up for my new iMac, Ipad and PC Netbook, particularly if I can access all files and data stored on any device. But I have a Conceptronic router.
1. Will Time Capsule work with this and how?
2. Can my printer USB be plugged in and then shared between the devices?
3. Can I create a network and how?
4. What happend when a visitor logs onto my existing wireless router?
I'm new to Macs (well a returning user having started with Mac Plus!!) and not very technical. Any help / advice will be much appreciated.
Ray

The key to what you seem to want to do is to be able to get Apple's Time Capsule router to "join" the network that your Conceptronic router. I believe that works with some third-party routers, but I've never seen a list of those that work in such a configuration and I have no experience with Conceptronic equipment.
You might be better off with a Network-Attached Storage (NAS) device instead of a Time Capsule.

My MacBook Pro Early 2008 freezes up with Kernel Panic, i restarting by pressing the power button for about 8 to 10 seconds, but nothing happen and still getting kernel panic 9c2028 10.5.2 Darwin 9.2.1 Anybody please help me get out this panic.

I am writting to ask for help with my old version MacBook Pro early 2008 with Kernel Panic 9C2028 10.5.2 Darwin 9.2.1. My MacBook Pro freezes up with a panic and have to shut it down by pressing and holding the power button. When I restard the comp it keep showing the same Kernel Panic. Will any body outthere heppe me get out this freezes up panic kernel Darwin 9.2.1.
Thanks You

Looks like a RAM failure or maybe another hardware failure.
Can you take out the battery and with the charger connected start up? Same failure?
Have you tried the SMC reset and PRAM reset? do both twice.

Auto PO for Services with ME59N

Hi
I have done following settings.
1) Auto PO marked in Vendor master
2)SproMMExternal Services ManagementSource Determination and Default Valuesfor Purchasing Organizations-Auto Po generation for service requitions.
3)PR created with Item cat --D and account assignment cat K with material group as input data.
no material number
4)Info record created for material group and vendor.
5)Source assigned to PR via T code ME56
still iam facing issue When i go ME59N "please maintain service or limit"

Hi There
in the PR in change mode(Me52n) maintain the limits ( in Line item details- Tab Limits,Overall Limit and Expected value)
and then try to convert through Me59n
It will work
Thanks
Senthil

Macbook air locks up instead of standby. Cannot wake with screen black and no sound. Have to hold power button for total restart. Happened with Mountain Lion and Maverick

I've had this issue since first buying my MBA mid-2013. Instead of going to standby, which works 98% of the time, every now and again it appears to go into standby with the screen black, but no amount of key pressing or mouse moving will wake it up. I am forced to hold down power button for a manual restart and faced with losing work. This problem has occured whilst using Mountain Lion and still occuring since updating to Maverick.

GoreLeech wrote:
Hello,
Having searched high and low, I can't seem to find a solution to my predicament.
Sun Feb 13 20:50:44 2011
panic(cpu 0 caller 0x9f8bfa): NVRM[0/1:0:0]: Read Error 0x00000100:
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M, NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M, PCIe, 256 MB
Hi there, GoreLeech,
as per above extract from your error log, you have experienced a kernel panic due to problems with your Nvidea GeForce GT 330 M graphics card that has a 256 MB memory.
This may be due to the card not having enough memory for what you are doing, the only thing, I can suggest here is to call Apple, and get the machine checked out. You can run the Apple hardware test at home but I'd recommend getting it booked in with Apple. What is worse: A computer that randomly malfunctions, or doing without it for up to one week (often they repair it within a day!)?

My iphone 5 is problem facing like that. when i switch off my iphone5 then plugh for charge with data cable or charger adapder or only data cable with no power connect phone is starting why? means on my phone Why? any one can explane this matter please. s

my iphone 5 is problem facing like that. when i switch off my iphone5 then plugh for charge with data cable or charger adapder or only data cable with no power connect phone is starting why? means on my phone Why? any one can explane this matter please. switched off my phone but on without power button . what is the problem?
Thanks
s.m slim

all iphone is same like that

Workflow: Auto forward for next level for decision with object (RFQ)

Hi all,
I have the same requirement as the one in this post but for RFQ approval instead of PO
Workflow -Auto forward for next level for decision with object (PR)
I have tried deadline monitoring, but I need to capture the level in which the RFQ is in order to escalate.
Can someone let me know how to proceed further.
Regards,
nsp.

Hi Aamir,
As you said we have to use deadline monitoring here.
For this case use 'Requested Start'. From your i came to know this workitem should be a dialog workitem, so the workflow will wait for the time what you have specified in the requested start and when it is reached it places the workitem in the corresponding recipient inbox.
Regards
Balaji E.

Auto power-on for MacMini with WinXp

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for