Auto route change for high latency

Dear Boss
I have cisco 2811 at branch and 3845 at Head office. Two link with 256 kbps bandwidthe each. I did as follows:
Interface Tunnel 1
Keep alive 5 4
IP xxxxxxx
Interface Tunnel 2
Keep alive 5 4
IP yyyyyyy
Ip route X.X.X.X tunnel 1
Ip route X.X.X.X tunnel 2 10
When link 1 down, traffic change to Tunnel 2. its OK.
I want when link1 flaxuate or latency high (more than 60 ms) traffice change to tunnel 2. If link 2 goes high latency automatically change to tunnel 1.
What can i do for both end ????
Please help me .
Shahid

Things seem ok at the moment, but this this high latency only happened in the evenings. Will check this evening to see if it happens again.
Line state
Connected
Connection time
4 days, 13:42:02
Downstream
8,128 Kbps
Upstream
448 Kbps
ADSL settings<script type="text/javascript"></script>
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
ITU-T G.992.1
Latency type
Fast
Noise margin (Down/Up)
6.3 dB / 23.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
9.0 dB / 4.5 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
11.8 dBm / 12.3 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local)
0
Loss of Signal (Local)
0
Loss of Power (Local)
0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
0 / 0
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
58 / 2147480000
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
nil / 39
Error Seconds (Local)
35

Similar Messages

Time change for daylight savings and Alarms not working correctly

we have 3 iPhones in our house. 2 were set to auto time change for daylight saving and one wasn't. 1 did the auto time change with out an issue and all alarms worked ok. The other 2 have had issues with not been able to set the alarms ie set alarm for 0630 and it goes off at 0530 even though the time is set correctly. The 1 that was set to autotime worked fine until I switch auto time off, now the alarms on this one wont work either. well they work but just at the wrong time. The 3rd phone will allow alarms to be set, but the alarm will go off an hour earlier and this phone will not allow the alarm to be set for 0630 at all.
Has anyone had this issue and resolved it. It makes getting up for shift work a right pain..

Read here:
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/10/11/applesays_ios_software_update_to_fix_pesky_alarm_clockbug.html

Routing Change display

Could any one help to get the routing changes for a material.

Hi
If your question is solved, make a habbit to close the question and reward points as a way to thanks.
regards
Srinivas

Mass change for QM at operation level in routing

Dear Experts,
I have to carry out mass change for Quality Management at operation level in routing. The steps that I am carrying out for an individual record are as follows.
1.     CA02
2.     Inspection point 100 is maintained at header level
3.     Go to operation level
4.     At operation level work center and control key have been maintained
5.     Double click on operation
6.     When I scroll down here I go to Quality Management: Inspection Points view.
7.     There by default in Insp.pointCompletion system shows the option as u201CQuantity, valuation (production) and radio button selected default indicates u201CQty-relatedu201D
8.     I want to change these options as only u201CValuationu201D and u201CNo relationu201D respectively
My queries are,
1.     Is there any T-code available to carry out these changes in mass?
2.     Is it possible to do this without any Z development?
I am doubtful about using LSMW here. I would be highly grateful to you if someone can help me step by step.
Thanking you,
Anand Rao

Hi Sujit,
Thanks for your reply!
I tried CWBQM. Unfortunately could not succeed. I think may not be feasible through CWBQM.
But I came across T-Code CEWB . There I opted "SAP_OPERATION" as working area and it worked. Its quite useful T-Code.
Thanks again for your input.
Regards,
Anand Rao

High latency and some PL, culprit seems to be a router within comcast

Hi: I reported this issue to Comcast support but I think I'll post it here too. I'm seeing high latency routing through the Comcast network to a variety of locations. In all endpoints I try, I see high latency except when I hit Comcast endpoints (which makes sense). Here's some output for you: WinMTR outputTraceroute output Note that in all cases, there is a significant slowdown somewhere between hop 9 and 11, always at a comcast router. This issue has been going on for a few hours. Anyone else seeing it?

Hi: (Not sure of the correct forum for this type of request so I'm reposting here after first posting over here) I posted a couple days ago with some issues that seem to have returned. Seeing high latency and occasional PL trying to get from my home to a variety of well-known endpoints. WinMTR output. Anyone else seeing the same? Comcast? This is starting to become a thing. Really annoying for those of us who rely on low latency connectivity when working from home!

Skills/Knowledge needed for low latency/high throughput development

I have a meeting/technical interview next week for a department at work (foreign exchange). It is going to be a technical interview. I know from the team that they use java heavily, using jvm optimisation, modifications to garbage collection, and have servers placed as close to the exchanges as possible to minimise latency. They said they need to work in "micro seconds" opposed to milliseconds and this means being as efficient as possible.
I love java development, but am relatively inexperienced but i really want this job. What would you suggest needs to be researched for a role like this in order to stand the best chance of getting it. I dont think knowing about inheritance, auto boxing/unboxing is going to help much in this?
I am thinking potentially looking at new releases to the java platform such as closures to demonstrate i am keeping up to date with current trends but as for the rest of it i am not really sure.
I would really appreciate some pointers around considerations for low latency / high volume / highly concurrent development in java if possible.
Just for a little more detail, the backend uses KDB database with a java fx front end
Thanks

ea33334c-b8a8-437b-9807-a170194a1950 wrote:
it is part of my graduate placement. i have to do a rotation to a new team. i hope you were only so blunt because i fogot to mention this ?
How is any of what you just said relevant? I was 'so blunt' because you seem to be setting yourself (and your potential new teammates) up for failure. Based on what you posted you are nowhere near qualified for the task you described.
Further there is absolutely NOTHING in what you posted that talks about any skills that you DO have. You didn't mention A SINGLE THING about your skillset or how you might add value to that team or project.
Your educational experience should provide some guidelines for how you advance your skills in ANY subject. Each college course has prerequisites and for good reason. Taking a course when you don't have the proper foundation and background is the surest way to fail. Colleges don't let you do it. You have likely been in classes where some of your classmates were clearly in over their head. For those people that course will be nothing but headache and heartache and their chances of success are minimal.
It is the same with most endeavors including the one you mention in your thread. Naturally you want to challenge yourself when you join a new project or team but you have to be able to hold your own and contribute. Taking on a task or project when you don't have the necessary experience will not only subject you to unnecessary problems but you can easily have a large negative impact on the entire team and project.
I suggest you try to find a different project where whatever (still unknown to us) skills you have can be used to contribute to the team effort. No one expects new team members to know everything or as much as more experienced developers but they also don't want an 'anchor' that is going to drag them down.

I like the idea of auto back-up for my new iMac, Ipad and PC Netbook, particularly if I can access all files and data stored on any device. But I have a Conceptronic router. Will Time Capsule work with this and how?

I like the idea of auto back-up for my new iMac, Ipad and PC Netbook, particularly if I can access all files and data stored on any device. But I have a Conceptronic router.
1. Will Time Capsule work with this and how?
2. Can my printer USB be plugged in and then shared between the devices?
3. Can I create a network and how?
4. What happend when a visitor logs onto my existing wireless router?
I'm new to Macs (well a returning user having started with Mac Plus!!) and not very technical. Any help / advice will be much appreciated.
Ray

The key to what you seem to want to do is to be able to get Apple's Time Capsule router to "join" the network that your Conceptronic router. I believe that works with some third-party routers, but I've never seen a list of those that work in such a configuration and I have no experience with Conceptronic equipment.
You might be better off with a Network-Attached Storage (NAS) device instead of a Time Capsule.

How to change auto logoff time for Essbase AddIn when Essbase server is in Shared Services mode

Hi all,
could anybody describe me the way to change the auto logoff time for the Essbase Excel AddIn? I only know the possibility to change the properties in the EAS console, but our Essbase Server is running in Shared Services mode so the relevant settings doesn't apply...
Thanks a lot!
Kind Regards
Andre

You should still be able to set the "Inactive limit" in EAS or use Maxl e.g. alter system set session_idle_limit x minutes;
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Monitoring/Traps for Route Changes: OSPF

Hello all. Silly question time.
I'm running OSPF on Cisco 6500s and would like to be notified when route changes happen.
I can't figure a way to get that notification. I've found all sorts of traps available to alert me to all sorts of OSPF information; but I can't find anything specific to route changes.
I'm using Solarwinds Orion as well.
I have to be missing something simple but I can't seem to figure out what that is. Does anyone know how to get the info/trap sent to Orion I'm loking for?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Hamp

See this discussion for a great explanation by Joe that should be what your looking for when neighbors change ocurr.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3066375

High latency ping to local router on wifi

I'm running 10.10.3 on a MacBook Air mid 2012 and have started to experience very high latency when using WiFi. I've gone through some of the internets and deleted a few files out of /Library/Preferences/SystemConfiguration/ but that didn't do anything. A few other searches yield similar stories but nothing suggested fixed it. For the life of me I can't figure this one out.
Doesn't matter what WiFi network I am using
Hardwired works great
Here's a sample of what I am seeing. Packet loss being 0% is only on the LAN.. as soon as I ping something on the WAN I'm getting a few percentage dropped packets.
$ sudo ping -i .1 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
76 packets transmitted, 76 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.372/244.464/1391.556/372.973 ms

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
There are multiple possible reasons. Hosts aren't required to treat pings with utmost priority, so some of the variability could be just how busy the host is or there could also be congestion along the path, to name two possible issues.
Again, "basic" ping is really more to determine a host is "alive", not for highly accurate latency measurements. However, if you enable IP timestamp, you might get more accurate RTT latency (you may need to calculate the deltas, yourself).

Router script for Automated router changes

I am new to the scripting world and do need assistance in developing a script that will assist me to perform the following tasks when executed
1] remove all existing tunnels
2] remove dialer/BVI interface
3] create new DMVPN tunnel
- tunnel x--- MPLS connection to data center
-tunnel y--- Guest traffic
4] Configure interface gi0/2 for broadband connection
- negotiate DHCP addresses
5] remove RIP routing
6] remove EIGRP routing
7] remove route-map pbr-dsl
8] remove route-map pbr-extsrv
9] create route-map for internet traffic over verizon ( pbr-verizon)
- set interface gi0/2
10] create route-map for internet traffic over mpls (pbr-mpls)
- set interface ser0/0
11] apply pbr-verizon to VLANS 10,20,30,40
12] modify NAT statement
13] create inbound and outbound ACL for Gi0/2 interface
- permit udp gre traffic from VIP
- permit tcp any any established
-permit tcp any any eq ftp-data
-permit udp any any eq domain
14] combine all other ACL to ensure no blocking will occur based on all internet traffic from verizon and not mpls

Joseph,
My question is on syntax when using username and password. I'm stuck on a script that I found here on the support forums that is using the Expect command.
My goal is to run the script from a host monitoring server using a device list file to go out and telnet into each one of the routers to run a "Show Inventory" command.
All the routers are using local AAA with username and password to get to the Privledged Exec mode. Here's a copy of my script. I have bolded the parts that I'm curious if correct. If you could check over it and let me know where my mistakes (If any) are located, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Brandon
# Here, we specify all our commands in a list, that we will issue one
# by one at a later time.
set commands {
"show inventory"
# This variable is for a file called hosts.txt that has the hostname/IP
# of all of the routers you are collecting information from.
set device_list [read [open "hosts.txt"]]
# Specify the username and password, as well as what we expect the routers'
# prompt to be.
set username "blah"
set pass "mypassword1234"
set prompt "#"
# This command tells expect not to echo the output to the console.
exp_log_user 0
# We loop through each device in our list, one by one...
foreach device $device_list {
    # Set each device's log file to be the name of the device...
    # (i.e. router1.location.com-log.txt)
    set file_name "$device-log.txt"
    # Assuming you are using PuTTY, and have plink.exe, we initiate the SSH
    # connection
    exp_spawn plink.exe -telnet $device
    # If we see a message asking about the device's host key, accept it.
    expect -re ".*ogin:" {
        exp_send "$username\r"
        exp_send "$pass\r"
    # We log our output from each router to its specified file.
    exp_log_file -a $file_name
    # Loop through each command that we specified earlier.
    foreach cmd $commands {
        expect -re $prompt {
            exp_send "$cmd\r"
            exp_sleep 1
    # Now we enter enable mode for the running-config
    expect -re $prompt {
        send "en\r"
    expect -re ".*assword:" {
        send "$enable_pass\r"
    expect -re $prompt {
        send "term len 0\r"
    expect -re $prompt {
        send "show running-config\r"
    expect -re $prompt {
        exp_send "quit\r"
    # Turn off logging.
    exp_log_file

I have just purchased my Iphone 4s, and the volume of the sound is very low, I can hardly hear the other person. I have tried the button for higher volume, but there is no change

I have just purcahsed my Iphone 4s, and the volume is very low, I can hardly hear the other person talk. I have tried the botton for higher volume, but it doesn`t work. Can anybody give me an answer to what is wrong?

Did u take out the screen protection?

Very high latency on my MBP 3,1 (mid 2007) with airport extreme card 0x168C

Hi
I wanted to let you know that i filled a bug report concerning a problem involving a MacBookPro3,1 and my airport extreme card (AirPort Extreme (0x168C, 0x87) Firmware Version 1.4.16.2)
If you've got any feedback, please feel free to share it with me.
Here's the bug report:
Hello
I'm experiencing very high latency on my MBP when connected using Wi-Fi in my living room and I believe this is a software bug.
This is the trace of my ping test to my router (5m from me):
macbookpro:~ laurent$ ping 192.168.0.254
PING 192.168.0.254 (192.168.0.254): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1536.229 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=536.642 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3444.466 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2547.260 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2671.552 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1671.272 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2619.991 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1619.350 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=2362.474 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1362.662 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=363.461 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=1407.557 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1020.437 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=119.570 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.254 ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 13 packets received, +1 duplicates, 7% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 119.570/1663.066/3444.466/937.468 ms
These are the details of my network when alt clicking on the network icon:
ca:69:50:37:c7:b2
Channel: 5
RSSI: -54
Transmit Rate: 54
I'm using Channel 5 where my router is the only device available (checked with iStumbler and KissMac).
I compared these results with another computer sitting at the same place:
This is the trace of my ping test to my router using a PC laptop:
C:\Documents and Settings\Laurent>ping -t 192.168.0.254
Envoi d'une requête 'ping' sur 192.168.0.254 avec 32 octets de données :
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=2 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=2 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=3 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=3 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=2 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=3 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=3 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=6 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=8 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=1 ms TTL=64
Statistiques Ping pour 192.168.0.254:
Paquets : envoyés = 16, reçus = 16, perdus = 0 (perte 0%),
Durée approximative des boucles en millisecondes :
Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 8ms, Moyenne = 3ms
(PC: Win XP SP3 with Linksys Wi-Fi card)
Obviously, my Mac has very high latency where my PC works as expected.
I tried resetting the PRAM, but i didn't affect my results.
I tried updating Airport with the latest AirPort Client Update (http://support.apple.com/downloads/AirPortClient_Update_for_MacBook_and_MacBookPro), but my hardware wasn't eligible for that update (Mid 2007 MacBookPro).
I believe this isn't a hardware bug because i get acceptable ping results when next to my router or in other rooms of my flat.
Can you help me with that bug ?
Regards,
Laurent
Hardware Overview:
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro3,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 2.2 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 4 MB
Memory: 2 GB
Bus Speed: 800 MHz
Boot ROM Version: MBP31.0070.B07
SMC Version (system): 1.16f11
Serial Number (system): W874551DX91
Hardware UUID: 00000000-0000-1000-8000-001B63B19195
Sudden Motion Sensor:
State: Enabled
AirPort:
Type: AirPort
Hardware: AirPort
BSD Device Name: en1
IPv4 Addresses: 192.168.0.2
IPv4:
Addresses: 192.168.0.2
Configuration Method: DHCP
Interface Name: en1
NetworkSignature: IPv4.Router=192.168.0.254;IPv4.RouterHardwareAddress=00:07:cb:3e:04:ef
Router: 192.168.0.254
Subnet Masks: 255.255.255.0
DNS:
Server Addresses: 212.27.40.241, 212.27.40.240
DHCP Server Responses:
Domain Name Servers: 212.27.40.241,212.27.40.240
Lease Duration (seconds): 0
DHCP Message Type: 0x05
Routers: 192.168.0.254
Server Identifier: 192.168.0.254
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
Proxies:
Exceptions List: *.local, 169.254/16
FTP Passive Mode: Yes
Ethernet:
MAC Address: 00:1e:52:72:05:2c
Media Options:
Media Subtype: Auto Select
AirPort Card Information:
Wireless Card Type: AirPort Extreme (0x168C, 0x87)
Wireless Card Locale: Worldwide
Wireless Card Firmware Version: 1.4.16.2
Current Wireless Network: kalamar
Wireless Channel: 5

Ok, I must have jinxed myself.
High latency with my Negear WPN824v3. As previously mentioned, the other wireless computers connect fine. Latency remains regardless of the power connected or not.
Please advise.
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=11.607 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=7280.106 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=9209.019 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=8237.475 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=7262.603 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=4313.763 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=3336.361 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=2339.579 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1344.110 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=345.132 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=1191.119 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=3969.730 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=3992.111 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=3692.648 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=2927.634 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=2130.216 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=1437.424 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=2385.203 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=1393.622 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=396.783 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=1.295 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=115.793 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=3.137 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=10.240 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=2.709 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=9.958 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=1818.371 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=1470.613 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=472.520 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=2255.417 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=18198.039 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=23288.761 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=35 ttl=64 time=25150.840 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=26813.832 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
63 packets transmitted, 34 packets received, 46% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.295/4906.111/26813.832/7241.136 ms

High latency issue of an evening whilst gaming.

Hiya`s Peeps, Having recently switched to BT from Virgin (this being only my third day as a customer) as the VM service for gaming in my area (Sth Manchester) on thier 50mb package was simply not viable due to over utilisation issues, I now find myself experiencing high latency issues with my BT service.
All three evenings have been lost to me as my in game latency (World of Warcraft) has rose upto 3500ms with occasional disconnections.
Also strange was that was after the BB was first switched on I had a consistent in-game latency of 24ms home and 24ms world, this lasted around 8 hours until I experienced my first lag spike, I was disconnected and when I eventually was able to get back in game, some 20 minutes or so later, my home and world latency had changed to 42/45 (still playable ) but every 10 to 15 minutes the world latency would again rise to around 3k and above and I would again be disconnected from the server.
I do apologise for the lack of any technical detail within this post as I simply do not understand such and struggle terribly with it, I am very happy with both my speed and ping tests, both being excellent in comparison to that that I would see when using the VM service.
What I am after I guess is advice from the community on how to get the best from BT bb for playing my online game, this connection is only used for World of Warcraft and very light reading on the www, I do not have a phone connected to this line and use no wireless connections with it at all, this PC (hard wired) is the only contraption connected.
Any help and advice will be greatly appreciated, Thankyou
Les

welcome to the forum
there is a 10 day training period after your connection is activated during which time you need to leave the router connected with no manual resets. The router may reset (often) during training but that is normal as the equipment in the exchnage tries to find the best stable connection for your line.
after the training period is complete and you have a stable connection then you can get the latency changed to 'fast' if yours latency is 'interleaved' changing to fast can make your line less stable than interleaved but it is the choice of gamers
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

High Latency on BT Infinity II

I've had major issues with online gaming (Xbox One) using Infinity II for over a week, previously I had no issues and everything was fine. After resetting the Home Hub 5 back to factory defaults and performing a BT Wholesale Broadband Performance Test at http://speedtest.btwholesale.com/ I was suprised by the high latency in the results.
The download speed and upload speed is exactly what I expect, so for browsing and general internet use it is fine, but I suspect the high latency will be giving me problems with gaming, 40ms seems rather high to me.

I too have the same issue. The HH5 is the worst router i have come across. Difficult to configure and having to factory reset and reconfigure every few days is ridiculous. I had nearer 65Mb download speed and a letency <10ms but now the speend has dropped to 50Mb and the latency is over 100ms. Quite often it means completely unusable.
I spent an hour on the phone to India at the weekend with zero value... Sitting on a wired connection I was told to disable the 5G wirless to improve performance and then that i shouldn't change any of the values on the HH5.. It would be useful to be able to set at least one static IP for my printer! I have an engineer booked for this morning.
I'd hate to be the 9/10 who rate the BT service as the advert!

Auto route change for high latency

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for