Auto transport between DEV & QTY

HI,
I need to configure the Auto transport scenario between DEV & QTY in a three system landscape..
The DEV has two clients such as Customization & Development ..Whatever we release in the customization client it should get imported in the QTY automatically..Please help me out to attain this scenario with your procedure.
I would appreciate your help
Thanks in advance

Hello
It is easy.
Please consider the following, you customizing need to be part of "development class" / package.
Package is then part of transport layer.
If transport request is release then it will be added to import queue of QTY system.
At QTY you just need to set up STMS transport job, it is done through the stms queue of system QTY, import ALL "big car" and after choose periodic.
Please see
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/c4/6045377b52253de10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
Best regards,
Peter

Similar Messages

Request owner approval in Transport Workflow (DEV to QTY)

Hello,
I have set up the transport workflow between DEV and QTY systems on ERP6.
I need to allow developers and consultants to approve their own transport proposals in order to facilitate transport to the QTY system.
Currently, when an user releases a transport request and creates a transport proposal, the approval message is sent to the TMS Worklist.
Therefore, only administrators can approve transport proposals.
How to allow users to approve and import their own requests through the Transport Proposal Inbox in Transport Organizer (SE10) ?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Serguei,
Please check whether you have specified &_WF_INITIATOR& as excluded agent.
Please remove &_WF_INITIATOR& as excluded agent.
With Best Regards
Julia

What is CTS ? what is the role of CTS in between DEV and QAS?

Dear
What is CTS ? what is the role of CTS in between DEV and QAS?
Thanx & Regards
Mohamamd Nabi
[email protected]

hello, friend.
actually, you can search for subjects like this in the threads archive. you will be pleasantly surprised to find that there are already many threads with similar issues and that you can find answers to even more otherwise unrealized questions. and you don't have to wait for anyone to reply.
it looks like the issue is urgent for you, and this is why i am attaching this feed from Sadhu Kishore, which was posted some time ago... (if he replies to your thread, you may choose to award him points).
"Hi,
The transport workflow provides a framework for transporting enhancements or new developments of existing business functions in a system landscape. It provides a direct connection between development and transport administration. The transport workflow manages the transport process, determines the user for each individual step automatically, and then displays an interface which they can use to perform the task directly.
It is an efficient method of transporting a selected number of requests into a group of transport targets, and uses clearly defined approval steps to ensure the quality of your target systems. The requests can be transportable change requests, Customizing requests, relocation transports or transports of copies. The transport targets do not need to be located on defined transport routes. However, the transport workflow can involve some risks, caused by the dependencies between transport requests:
Import sequence
It is important that you import requests in the correct order, so that development work is up-to-date in the target system.
Incompleteness
It is important that the functions transported in the transport proposal are complete; otherwise errors may occur in the import system.
A request is not imported, but it contains an important data element. You use another request to transport a table that references this data element. Since the referenced data element does not exist in the target system, activation errors will occur when you import the second request.
The transport workflow is a generic workflow. Its ability to process the transport route configuration in TMS enables it to adapt itself to any system landscape. This means you can transport multiple requests into multiple targets, even if these targets are not located on the transport routes.
This reduces the amount of work for the transport administrator significantly. The automated nature of the workflow also reduces the likelihood of errors during transports.
You can use the transport workflow in two different ways.
Transport workflow as a transport strategy
If you have production systems in your landscape that can only accept approved transports, we recommend that you use the transport workflow to organize and coordinate the transport process.
To do this, set Workflow-controlled transports as your transport strategy and configure the transport workflow.
When you release a transport request, the transport workflow starts automatically and the screen Create Transport Proposal appears. The requests are then released implicitly when the transport proposal is sent to the transport administrator.
Special transport workflow (mass transports)
You can use the special transport workflow to make transports that do not follow the defined transport routes or that take place outside the normal transport schedule (part of the mass transport strategy). These transports may be corrections made in the development system that have to be transported into the production system without delay.
To use the special transport workflow, set Mass transports as your transport strategy and configure the transport workflow."
thanks. you have been most generous.
regards.

Transports between systems after support package application

Hi gurus, we need to apply a lot of support packages into the development system and I wanna know if in the meantime we need to "freeze" all transports between systems.
This because the systems (DEV - QA - PRD) are in differente support package level. This until we apply the support packages into the others systems
Thanks in advance.
Ronald.

Yes, any transport which is taking SAP standard code from DEV to QA to PRD should not move if the systems in landscape are on different support pack level. Because it can happen that SAP has done some modification to that standard code in new support pack.
However, anything which is isolated Z-development (like some z-output report or smartforms) can proceed.
But, I suggest , stop moving transports until all systems have same support pack level.
G@urav.

Transporting MII DEV to QA

Hello people.
Somebody have any "check-out list" for transportation between environments?
Federico Cicerchia
Argentina.

Hi Federico,
I am interpretating you question to be, how do I move my development from DEV to QAS. If I am wrong I apologize.
If you are using MII 12.0 then I suggest that you setup the directory structure for your development in a manner that allows you to move your development appropriately, i.e. in a manner that will allow you go grab what you need easily. So, in a simple example if your development project have 3 tasks; create data, amend data and report data. Then one way of setting up your directory structure would be as follows:
//project_name/data_mgnt/create_data
//project_name/data_mgnt/amend_data
//project_name/report_data
As I say it's a simple example but the underlying fact should be your directory structure makes it easy for you to move your development. Two things you probably want to stay away from are (1) moving all your development each time (2) moving pieces of your development that are contained in multiple directories because eventually you will miss something.
I hope I helped to answer your question.
Cheers,
Chris

Can not transport from DEV to PRD (Hang up)

Hi Experts,
Please help.. I have this problem, was not able to transport from Dev to Prod, it just hang up.. I've read a lot in web how to solve this problem and did the following:
   ==> Stop all TP running in OS level
   ==> Delete all pending job in Import Monitor (with truck logo)
   ==> and the last to be done is to delete the data from table TRBAT, but it took so long to delete the data in that table.. What I've noticed is that the data left in table TRBAT is the transport number wherein user was log-off during transport execution (as in the middle of the process)..
What should be the solution of this problem, as we can not proceed with the transport of our changes made in DEV system, as it just hang up in there.. and I'm also having this problem in deleteing data from TRBAT table.
Thanks.
Edited by: Deo Pasion on Feb 20, 2010 7:25 AM

Hi,
Its well known problem which is discussed many times in many threads.
Did you check TP System Log and TMS Alert of the System ?
Execute RSTPTEST report to check the STMS configuration. Also check the existence/status of RDDIMPDP Background Job.
Please refer these useful threads with similar symptoms.
[Transport (STMS) issue + Hang|Transport (STMS) issue + Hang]
[regarding STMS_IMPORT Transport Hang.|regarding STMS_IMPORT Transport Hang.]
Also check this SAP Note 71353 - Transports hang during background steps.
Regards
Bhavik G. Shroff

Performance problems between dev and prod

I run the same query with identical data and indexes, but one system takes a 0.01 seconds to run while the production system takes 1.0 seconds to run. TKprof for dev is:
Rows Row Source Operation
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BANDVALUE
3 NESTED LOOPS
1 NESTED LOOPS
41 NESTED LOOPS
41 NESTED LOOPS
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_PACKAGE
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0032600 (object id 51356)
41 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BANDELEMENT
41 AND-EQUAL
82 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BE2 (object id 53559)
41 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BE1 (object id 53558)
41 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BAND
41 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0034599 (object id 53556)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0032549 (object id 51335)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BV1 (object id 53557)Tkprof for Prod is :
Rows Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT MODE: ALL_ROWS
1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BANDVALUE' (TABLE)
52001 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_PACKAGE' (TABLE)
1 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0018725' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BANDELEMENT' (TABLE)
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_BE2' (INDEX)
26000 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BAND' (TABLE)
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0030648' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0018674' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_BV1' (INDEX).The row count varies greatly. But it shouldn't as the data is the same.
Any ideas?

From DEV you show the Row Source Operations for the query. The column named "Rows" signifies the actual number of rows processed with each step.
From PROD you show the Execution Plan for the query; that is, tkprof was executed with the EXPLAIN option which generates the execution plan as of the time when tkprof was run. The "Rows" column in the Explain Plan output comes from the PLAN_TABLE.CARDINALITY, which represents an estimate by the CBO for the number of rows [expected to be] processed with each step.
So, if by <quote>The row count varies greatly</quote> you meant these "Rows" columns outputs then you're are comparing actuals from a database with estimates from another. Get the Row Source Operations from both.
"Identical data and indexes":
1. data may be the same, but it is not necessarily stored physically the same way.
2. Indexes being the same means their definitions are the same; again, physically they are not necessarily identical
In other words, data in PROD (the way it is stored on disk) may have evolved as a result of discrete deletes/updates/inserts ... in DEV it could be, for example, stored more compact if you took a copy of PROD and moved into DEV. So, the number of blocks for your segments will likely be different between PROD and DEV, the clustering factor for your indexes are likely different, etc ... things which could [and do] influence the CBO. The statistics may be different.
I guess what I'm saying is ... it is quite hard, if not outright impossible, to get two identical databases/instances/load ... hence, don't expect the executions to be 100% identical, even if you have "identical data and indexes". By all means compare between DEV and PROD (make sure you compare the same thing though) and use the observed differences as an indicator for further investigation ... don't chase the goal of 100% identical behavior.
Now, by all means look at that query taking 1 second in PROD ... I have only addressed <quote>The row count varies greatly. But it shouldn't as the data is the same.</quote>

Problems when transporting from DEV to PROD

Hi experts, I have problem during transport from DEV to Production.
We have a DEV, QAS and PRODUCTION and we have transport from DEV to QAS very well. But when we transport from DEV to PROD, recibe an error like:
After beginning the import method RS_IOBC_AFTER_IMPORT for Objects types IOBC mode (activation)
Failed to verify catalog InfoObjetos ZCM_UNIMET_CHA01
The InfoObjeto ZCM_RENC version does not exist in active
The InfoObjeto ZCM_RENM version does not exist in active
1.The Query is: Wy if the transport go OK from DE to QAS, then The transport from DEV to PROD terminated in error?.
2. There are any items to check in production before to transport?.
PD: All of the Objects in DEV are in ACTIVE status
Tanks,
Ramon Sulvaran

The transport ended in QAS with error code (4) and ended in Producion with error code (8), the detal of the error in Production begin with:
Home After import RS_ODSO_AFTER_IMPORT method for type (s) ODSO object (trigger mode)
Activation of DataStore objects of type Object
Check DataStore objects of type Object
DataStore Object Verification ZCM_DS01
The DataStore object is consistent ZCM_DS01
Burning the DataStore objects of type Object
Internal activation (DataStore Object)
Pretreatment / Creating DDIC objects to DataStore Object ZCM_DS01
Table / View / BIC/AZCM_DS0100 (type 0) DataStore object recorded ZCM_DS01
Create / Delete the indexes for the active table
Table / View / BIC/AZCM_DS0140 (type 4) recorded ZCM_DS01 DataStore object
Type of table / BIC/WAZCM_DS0100 recorded
Table / View / BIC/VZCM_DS012 (type VIEW) recorded ZCM_DS01 DataStore object
Log ZCM_DS01 DataStore object changes was recorded successfully
Writing Object Catalog entries (Tadiran)
He has written the object TABL / BIC/AZCM_DS0100 in catálgo objects (Tadiran)
He has written the object TABL / BIC/AZCM_DS0140 in catálgo objects (Tadiran)
He has written the object TABL / BIC/VZCM_DS012 in catálgo objects (Tadiran)
He has written the object TTYP / BIC/WAZCM_DS0100 in catálgo objects (Tadiran)
Activate all ABAP Dictionary objects (5):
Error / Warning in progr.activación Dict., Detailed log> Detail
Activate table / BIC/AZCM_DS0100.
Lack of expansion to the category table
Lack of extension category for include or subtype .......
When i go to BW Production to check teh object. I see tha the Object was create but in inactive status (grey color). When y Try to Actiavate it y see the error: Error/ Warning in program Activation Dcit. Detailed Log -> Detail

Auto-tabbing between input text fields in AS3

Hello-
I am having some trouble figuring out how to work auto-tabbing between input text fields when a user inputs a character. I have a series of text boxes with maxChar set to 1, and when the user inputs a character, I would like it to auto-tab to the next one. I'm putting together a crossword-style banner ad so the auto-tabbing will help tremendously. All the input text fields are instanced on the stage as input1, input2, etc; not called in from a custom class. Also, I've been working with AS3 for about 2 weeks lol!
thanks!

Awesome, thank you, that works nicely! Now I need to figure out how to capture individual keyCodes for each input and then come up with a conditional to check for right or wrong answers. I have a "check your answers" button all set up. I think I am almost there, possibly a syntax hiccup for me. Any advice on how to do that would be appreciated.

Transporting from DEV server to Production Server

Dear Experts,
Like in ABAP and other SAP modules we are having Transport Requests to transport from Dev server to Production server In XI how can we transport all the configuration done by me from Dev server to Production server.

Hi,
In XI we can transport in two ways :
1) File Transport
2) Using CMS which needs configuration to be done
Using the File Transport you can easily the Export the Objects and Import the Objects in the Target system.
Select the Object in the Design or Configuration ->right Click you will find Export option.
When you select the It creates the .tpz file which can be imported in the Target System
Using file transfer or CMS we transport xi objects.
Transporting XI from DEV to QA
Look into this blog for how to export / improt IR and ID objects,
XI Software Logistics II: Overview
XI Software Logistics 1: SLD Preparation
Transporting IR,ID Objects using File System
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/93/a3a74046033913e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/a8/5e56006c17e748a68bb3843ed5aab8/frameset.htm
Regards
Ganga

Transporting from DEV to QA

We have 3 different sld's for DEV,QA,and PRD systems.
i need to transport my XI objects from DEV to QA.i'm working on standard XI contents.
i need answers for my following questions.
1.if i use full export for transporting SLD from DEV to QA,can i use the same tecnical systems and business systems in QA?
Can T.S and B.S also get transported from DEV to QA?
2.In such case how to define business systems groups and transport targets?
pls don't send any blogs..i've all the blogs
thanks
Abhijit

Hi,
1.if i use full export for transporting SLD from DEV to QA,can i use the same tecnical systems and business systems in QA?
Can T.S and B.S also get transported from DEV to QA?
You can use same technical systems and Business systems.
1. Go to Dev SLD and Export all your SWCV, Products, Technical and Business Systems. This is nothing but saving of the SLD objects as a CIM file on your local machine. You would also need to export the Technical And Business System poitning to your XI integration server .
2. Go to the QA SLD and then import these objects exported in Step 1 in QA SLD
3. Now, create the QA Tech and Business Systems in the QA SLD
4. Go to the Dev Business systems imported on the QS SLD and you will have an option Transport Targets. In this map the Source Business System to the Target Business Systems.
Make sure that all Dev Business Systems have the correspodning Transport Targets for the QA Business SYstems
5. Now if you import the ID objects in QA , the business systems name will be renamed automatically.
2.In such case how to define business systems groups and transport targets?
You need to create Transport Groups on your QA SLD. One for Dev and One for QA. You can create Transport Groups only for Integration Server Business Systems.
And this is why you would need to export the Dev XI technical System and Business System from the SLD of Dev and Import it into the QA SLD.
2. Create the transport groups and then assign all Dev Business Systems to Dev Group, all QA Business Systems to QA group and then create the transport targets.
You use the Option related Integration server in the Business Systems to assign a Business System to a Group.
Refer
Problem regarding xi transport
Thanks
Swarup
Edited by: Swarup Sawant on Feb 26, 2008 11:55 AM

FB60 screen change layout different between DEV and PRD

Hi,
I'm having problem with transaction FB60. When i try to change the layout in PRD, in screen Edit System Setting, some of the field showing 0 length. For example in WBS element field, in DEV show length 24 but PRD show length 0. I try to compare the version but it is same (program & table structure - ACGL_ITEM). When I debug the program, found out that it will get the structure from sap internal c program call 'AB_GET_CX_DATA'. So, maybe this program version are different between DEV and PRD.
Anybody knows what is the cause of this problem? Or maybe somebody can tell me how to check sap internal c program.
Thank you very much.

Yes. FB60 is Enter Vendor Invoice. In this screen you can see a table with column such as GL Acct, Debit/Credit, Amount in DC, Cost Center and others. You can add or remove some of the field using Table Setting and create Screen Variant. My problem is, the length of WBS Element and Profit Center field is 0. How to change the length.
I already searched in forum but I only found how to create screen variant.
Thanks.

Consistency between dev and prod systems!!!!

Hi All,
I wuld like to check the consistency between Dev and Prod systems for all the Data model and other objects existing. I would like to do this sanity check to see whether the two systems are in sync. Are there any tools or transaction codes within SAP framework which can guide me in this direction.
Kind Regards,
Surya Tamada.

Hi Surya ,
First build whole data flow :
1 .Create Infoarea ,Infoobjects & Masterdata ,Infoproviders ,Infoobject Catelog under Infoarea,MetaData - Characteristics MeteData - Key Figures
2 DSOs ,Infocubes ,Infosets, Multiproviders ,Views in the development system ,Datasources for BW system,Flat File Datasources,Transformations
then get data from the se11 tables as per your requirement :
like RSDVCHA ,RSDBCHATR,RSDCUBEIOBJ,RSDICMULTIIOBJ etc and built view on it as per your requirement .
then built flat file data sources and transformation .
get all data downloaded to flat file in ur PC .In the same way from other system.
make flow from PC File Datasource -> DSO -> Infocube and build queries for different objects .load the downloaded files to them and then run query .
ex : query to compare cube will take cube name and systems name as input and compare objects .
Regards,
Jaya

Compare SPRO between DEV and QAs

Hi there,
I'm in GoLive eve and all consultants are desperate with the future problems.
Is there a way that I can compare the customizing (SPRO) between DEV and QAS or another system?
Thanks,
Dany Anderson
Edited by: Dany Anderson Alves on Mar 4, 2008 9:03 PM

Hi,
Use comparison tool in SCU0.
Select SAP Reference IMG and ssay compare.
This will show the differences if any.
You can also compare at component level.
cross system visibility should be maintained in SCC4 settings for the client
Regards,
Revathi

ChaRM configurtn-No network connectivity in between DEV-QA1 to QA2 and PRD

hi Experts,
We are planning to implement solution manager for CHaRM configuration.
Our Landscape is something like this...
ECD(DEV)->EC1(QA1) and
EA2(QA2)->EAP(PRD)
we are not having any network connectivity in between DEV-QA1 to QA2 and PRD. DEV and QA1 are in one network and QA2 and PRD are on other network.
DEV and QA1 are connected and QA2 and PRD are connected.
Now we need to implement ChaRM from Dev to PRD, so please suggest me how to implemet this. Whether this is possible or not? what different settings we have to do from standards.
It would be very great if you suggest us on this.
thanks
narpal

Hi Raghu,
we are moving the files (Co files and Data File) manually from QA1 to QA2.
We are runnning one batch proggram that moves the co file data file from QA1/DEV to one spefifyed folder/server/device.
And then from this device/folder to QA2 we are moveing manually.
Now same way whether we can move the files in case of ChaRM configuration? Please suggest?
thanks
Narpal

Auto transport between DEV & QTY

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for