AutoAccept for Resources

I have a conference room that no longer automatically accepts/declines meeting requests.  I have verified the calendar policies and that the AutoAccept flag is enabled.  The room mailbox accepts the messages to the Inbox but does not process
them.  I have about 30+ different rooms and equipment calendars and they are working fine.
We are a Exchange 2013 CU7 Hybrid environment.  All user mailboxes and resources are in Office 365.
PS C:\Windows\system32> Get-CalendarProcessing <ROOM> | fl *policy
RequestOutOfPolicy    : {}
AllRequestOutOfPolicy : False
BookInPolicy          : {}
AllBookInPolicy       : True
RequestInPolicy       : {}
AllRequestInPolicy    : False
PS C:\Windows\system32> Get-CalendarProcessing <ROOM> | fl automateprocessing
AutomateProcessing : AutoAccept
PS C:\Windows\system32> Get-MailboxFolderPermission <ROOM>:\calendar
FolderName           User                 AccessRights
Calendar             Default              {LimitedDetails}
Calendar             Anonymous            {Reviewer}
Calendar             <USER>         {Owner}

Hi,
According to your posting, the configuration for this room is correct. I suggest we can move this room mailbox to another database then check whether the issue persists.
Also run the following command to check the room mailbox:
get-mailbox <Identity>| fl *type*,*link*,*share*
Additionally, here is a helpful KB for your reference:
http://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2005631
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Database error"ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource"

    Hi All,
    I got dump as
    Database error text........: "ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for
      resource"
    Internal call code.........: "[RSQL/RDUP/NRIV ]"
    Please check the entries in the system log (Transaction SM21).
    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB', was not caught
    in
    procedure "READ_NRIV" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
    Can u ppl tell me how to get correct this?
    Edited by: Bala Chandar on Jul 20, 2009 11:01 AM

    Hi Bala,
    Same type of dump we got when we trigger the DTP which in process chain to load data from DSO to Info cube. And the load had processed with 225 data package and at 164th data package we got this error and except 164th data package all data package processed successfully
    And the request was red. So we had done processed manually by clicking the icon. So all its been green and successfully loaded.
    So when you do process manual the particular data package which got failed will be process successfully  

  • ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource CLOSE cursor

    Hi,
    I am a new member of this forum. I am working with a problem we got a few weeks ago. It is from a Pro C batch executable running on 10 threads dealing with >800 data accessed from multiple tables. The error as reported came from a package.function call.
    This is the error I encountered:
    process_item~G****, D***~-60~ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource~PACKAGE ERROR = CLOSE cursor C_***** in package R***.I*** 7641
    The cursor is a simple SELECT cursor without Table or Record locking.
    My questions are:
    *Upon the occurrence of this error, is the execution already at the CLOSE cursor line or did the error occurred between the OPEN cursor and the CLOSE cursor? There are several lines of code in between OPEN and CLOSE:
    - one that calls for a package.function that simply stores parameter values to a variable
    - another one which fetches the cursor. The group that holds the cursor values is only used by a single function in the package
    *Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor to cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
    *From what I know, Oracle deals with deadlocks by aborting the deadlocking process while others continue, but this deadlock caused our program to hang. How is this possible? Could the root cause of the deadlock be from our threading program? This is a rare occurrence and happened only twice this year.
    Thanks,
    Raf

    Raf Serrano wrote:
    Hi,
    I am a new member of this forum. I am working with a problem we got a few weeks ago. It is from a Pro C batch executable running on 10 threads dealing with >800 data accessed from multiple tables. The error as reported came from a package.function call.
    This is the error I encountered:
    process_item~G****, D***~-60~ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource~PACKAGE ERROR = CLOSE cursor C_***** in package R***.I*** 7641
    The cursor is a simple SELECT cursor without Table or Record locking.
    My questions are:
    *Upon the occurrence of this error, is the execution already at the CLOSE cursor line or did the error occurred between the OPEN cursor and the CLOSE cursor? There are several lines of code in between OPEN and CLOSE:
    - one that calls for a package.function that simply stores parameter values to a variable
    - another one which fetches the cursor. The group that holds the cursor values is only used by a single function in the package
    *Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor to cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
    *From what I know, Oracle deals with deadlocks by aborting the deadlocking process while others continue, but this deadlock caused our program to hang. How is this possible? Could the root cause of the deadlock be from our threading program? This is a rare occurrence and happened only twice this year.
    Thanks,
    RafSELECT (without FOR UPDATE) statements are never involved in ORA-00060.
    only DML statements throw ORA-00060 error

  • Getting deadlock detected while waiting for resource error for select Query.....

    Hi all,
    i am getting a below error whenever executing the below select query....
    some times it will show dead lock detected while waiting for resource and terminated...
    some times it executes and gives result..
    but all the time it writes an alert to alert log
    Plesae suggest how to resolve the issue..........
    Thanks in advance
    Env: Linux / Oracle 11.2.0.3.3
    Error from alert log:
    Errors in file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
    ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
    ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
    Trace file info... bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
    Trace file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    ORACLE_HOME = /u01/oracle/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1
    System name:    Linux
    Node name:      bdrdb.cteplindia.com
    Release:        2.6.18-308.el5PAE
    Version:        #1 SMP Fri Jan 27 17:40:09 EST 2012
    Machine:        i686
    Instance name: bdrdb
    Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
    Oracle process number: 92
    Unix process pid: 6076, image: [email protected] (P017)
    *** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** SESSION ID:(423.59970) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** CLIENT ID:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** SERVICE NAME:(bdrdb) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** MODULE NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** ACTION NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    *** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
    DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
    [Transaction Deadlock]
    Deadlock graph:
                           ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
    Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
    PS-00000001-00000011        92     423     S             33     128     S     X
    BF-2ed08c01-00000000        33     128     S             92     423     S     X
    session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126     session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
    session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23     session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
    DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
    [Transaction Deadlock]
    Deadlock graph:
                           ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
    Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
    PS-00000001-00000011        92     423     S             33     128     S     X
    BF-2ed08c01-00000000        33     128     S             92     423     S     X
    session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126     session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
    session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23     session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
    Rows waited on:
      Session 423: no row
      Session 128: obj - rowid = 00021DC1 - AAAh3BAAVAAAQL/AAA
      (dictionary objn - 138689, file - 21, block - 66303, slot - 0)
    ----- Information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
    Session 128:
      sid: 128 ser: 46176 audsid: 1836857 user: 102/DBLOCAL
        flags: (0x8000041) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
        flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
      pid: 33 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 31611
        image: [email protected]
      client details:
        O/S info: user: masked, term: masked, ospid: 5924:568
        machine: masked program: Toad.exe
        application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
      current SQL:
        application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
      current SQL:
      SELECT  DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
      FROM B_FP_TEST,
           B_USER_INFO,
           J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
           L_TEST_STATUS,
           L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
           j_op_test_anml
    WHERE     B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
           AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_00"
           AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (:"SYS_B_01", :"SYS_B_02", :"SYS_B_03")
           AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_04"
           AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = :"SYS_B_05"
           AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN (:"SYS_B_06", :"SYS_B_07", :"SYS_B_08")
           AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
    ----- End of information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
    *** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.916
    dbkedDefDump(): Starting a non-incident diagnostic dump (flags=0x0, level=3, mask=0x0)
    ----- Error Stack Dump -----
    ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
    ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
    ----- SQL Statement (None) -----
    Current SQL information unavailable - no cursor.
    ----- Call Stack Trace -----
    calling              call     entry                argument values in hex
    location             type     point                (? means dubious value)
    More......
    Query:
    SELECT DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
      FROM B_FP_TEST,
           B_USER_INFO,
           J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
           L_TEST_STATUS,
           L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
           j_op_test_anml
    WHERE     B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
           AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
           AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = 0
           AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (1, 2, 99)
           AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
           AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = 1
           AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN ('Scheduled', 'In-Progress', 'Completed')
           AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
           AND (   (j_op_test_anml.end_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
                                                AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
                OR (j_op_test_anml.start_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
                                                  AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
                OR (TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
                                                AND j_op_test_anml.end_date)
                OR (TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
                                                AND j_op_test_anml.end_date))
           AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
           AND B_FP_TEST.DATASOURCE_ID = 9
    Query Exp plan:
    Plan hash value: 3398228788
    | Id  | Operation                                          | Name                | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                                   |                     |  1501 |   102K|  1929   (1)| 00:00:24 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |   1 |  HASH UNIQUE                                       |                     |  1501 |   102K|  1929   (1)| 00:00:24 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |   2 |   CONCATENATION                                    |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |   3 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |   4 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ30005            |   241 | 16870 |   800   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,05 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |*  5 |      HASH JOIN                                     |                     |   241 | 16870 |   800   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
    |   6 |       PX RECEIVE                                   |                     |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
    |   7 |        PX SEND HASH                                | :TQ30004            |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,04 | P->P | HASH       |
    |*  8 |         HASH JOIN                                  |                     |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
    |   9 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
    |  10 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ30003            |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,03 | P->P | HASH       |
    |* 11 |            HASH JOIN                               |                     |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |  Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  12 |             BUFFER SORT                            |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q3,03 | PCWC |            |
    |  13 |              PX RECEIVE                            |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  14 |               PX SEND BROADCAST                    | :TQ30000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST  |
    |  15 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  16 |                 NESTED LOOPS                       |                     |   485 | 20855 |   781   (0)| 00:00:10 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  17 |                  TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| J_OP_TEST_ANML      |   485 | 10185 |   296   (0)| 00:00:04 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
    |* 18 |                   INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | IDX$$_2D190001      |   485 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 19 |                  INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                 | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 20 |                 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
    |  21 |             PX BLOCK ITERATOR                      |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q3,03 | PCWC |            |
    |* 22 |              TABLE ACCESS FULL                     | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  23 |          BUFFER SORT                               |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q3,04 | PCWC |            |
    |  24 |           PX RECEIVE                               |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
    |  25 |            PX SEND HASH                            | :TQ30001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
    |* 26 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  27 |       BUFFER SORT                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q3,05 | PCWC |            |
    |  28 |        PX RECEIVE                                  |                     |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
    |  29 |         PX SEND HASH                               | :TQ30002            |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
    |* 30 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL                         | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  31 |    NESTED LOOPS                                    |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  32 |     NESTED LOOPS                                   |                     |     3 |   210 |   329   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  33 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |     3 |   195 |   329   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 34 |       HASH JOIN                                    |                     |     2 |   114 |   325   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  35 |        NESTED LOOPS                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  36 |         NESTED LOOPS                               |                     |     6 |   258 |   322   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  37 |          PARTITION RANGE SINGLE                    |                     |     6 |   126 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 38 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL                        | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |     6 |   126 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 39 |          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                         | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 40 |         TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID         | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
    |* 41 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL                           | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 42 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   |     1 |     8 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 43 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN                            | FI_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 44 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                             | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 45 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                    | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  46 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  47 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ20003            |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q2,03 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |  48 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  49 |       NESTED LOOPS                                 |                     |    33 |  2310 |   399   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |* 50 |        HASH JOIN                                   |                     |    33 |  2145 |   397   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  51 |         PX RECEIVE                                 |                     |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  52 |          PX SEND HASH                              | :TQ20002            |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q2,02 | P->P | HASH       |
    |* 53 |           HASH JOIN                                |                     |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  54 |            BUFFER SORT                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q2,02 | PCWC |            |
    |  55 |             PX RECEIVE                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  56 |              PX SEND BROADCAST                     | :TQ20000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST  |
    |  57 |               NESTED LOOPS                         |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  58 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |    66 |  2838 |   382   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  59 |                 PARTITION RANGE SINGLE             |                     |    66 |  1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 60 |                  TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |    66 |  1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 61 |                 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 62 |                TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID  | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
    |  63 |            PX BLOCK ITERATOR                       |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q2,02 | PCWC |            |
    |* 64 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  65 |         BUFFER SORT                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWC |            |
    |  66 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  67 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ20001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
    |* 68 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL                       | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 69 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                           | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |* 70 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  71 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  72 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ10003            |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q1,03 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |  73 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  74 |       NESTED LOOPS                                 |                     |    33 |  2310 |   399   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |* 75 |        HASH JOIN                                   |                     |    34 |  2210 |   397   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  76 |         PX RECEIVE                                 |                     |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  77 |          PX SEND HASH                              | :TQ10002            |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q1,02 | P->P | HASH       |
    |* 78 |           HASH JOIN                                |                     |    78 |  3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  79 |            BUFFER SORT                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q1,02 | PCWC |            |
    |  80 |             PX RECEIVE                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  81 |              PX SEND BROADCAST                     | :TQ10000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST  |
    |  82 |               NESTED LOOPS                         |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  83 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |    66 |  2838 |   382   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |  84 |                 PARTITION RANGE SINGLE             |                     |    66 |  1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 85 |                  TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |    66 |  1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
    |* 86 |                 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 87 |                TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID  | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
    |  88 |            PX BLOCK ITERATOR                       |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q1,02 | PCWC |            |
    |* 89 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  90 |         BUFFER SORT                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWC |            |
    |  91 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |  92 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ10001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
    |* 93 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL                       | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
    |* 94 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                           | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    |* 95 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       5 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
       8 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
      11 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
      18 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
      19 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
      20 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
                  "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
      22 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
      26 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
      30 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
      34 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
      38 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
                  LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
      39 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
      40 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
                  "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
      41 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
      42 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
      43 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
      44 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
      45 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
      50 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
      53 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
      60 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
                  LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
      61 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
      62 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
                  "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
      64 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
      68 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
      69 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
      70 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
      75 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
      78 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
      85 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
                  LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND
                  (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
                  00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
      86 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
      87 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
                  "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
      89 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
      93 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
      94 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
      95 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)

    Excellent piece of follow-up on my first suggestion.
    I nearly made a comment about how the plan doesn't show Bloom filter pruning either - and then I realised why not. The plan you've shown us comes from Explain Plan with literal values present; the trace file shows bind variables with names that are generated when cursor_sharing is set to force or similar - so the run-time plan and the plan from explain plan are almost guaranteed to be different.
    Oracle support will need you to supply the plan you get from trying to run the query and then making a call to dbms_xplan.display_cursor() - dbms_xplan in 10g | Oracle Scratchpad If you do this I think you'll find that the pstart/pstop columns contain entries like :BF0000, and you may even find operations link PX JOIN FILTER CREATE / PX JOIN FILTER USE
    A couple of generic notes:
    if a query does sufficient work to merit parallel execution, then it's usually better to supply the best possible information to the optimizer, which means using literals rather than bind variables - you could try executing the query with the hint /*+ cursor_sharing_exact */ to stop Oracle from turning your literals into binds; it might be the presence of bind variables that's making the optimizer choose a path that has to include bloom filter pruning in your case.
    Where you have the to_date() call you've used a four-digit year - which is a very good thing and helps the optimizer - but it's also a good idea to include an explicit format string as well: with a four-digit year this probably won't make any difference, but it avoids any risk of ambiguity for the optimizer.
    I made a comment about the P->S stage and bottlenecks - I spent a couple more minutes looking at the plan, and I see the optimizer has used concatentation: in effect it has run three query blocks one after the other and fed the results to the query co-ordinator - in this case the P->S would make no difference to the end-user response time there's always a final P->S to the coordinator, you just happen to have three of them.
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis

  • Sqlldr- ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource

    Hi Team,
    My database version is 11.1.0.7.0. I am loading the data using sqlldr. I am getting the error ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource. once dead lock detected ,whether data will be rejected after commit point reached(Rows=100000). FYI information only sqllder is running on the database,it is getting completed withing 5-10min. please help me whether any other lock happening on this due to sqllder.
    sqlldr userid=orcl/orcle control=".$controlfile." log=".$logfile.".log data=".$datafile." bad=".$badfile." discard=".$discardfile." Bindsize=19000000 Rows=100000 Readsize=20000000 Errors=1000000";
    Thanks in advance

    user9256814 wrote:
    Hi Team,
    My database version is 11.1.0.7.0. I am loading the data using sqlldr. I am getting the error ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource. once dead lock detected ,whether data will be rejected after commit point reached(Rows=100000). FYI information only sqllder is running on the database,it is getting completed withing 5-10min. please help me whether any other lock happening on this due to sqllder.
    sqlldr userid=orcl/orcle control=".$controlfile." log=".$logfile.".log data=".$datafile." bad=".$badfile." discard=".$discardfile." Bindsize=19000000 Rows=100000 Readsize=20000000 Errors=1000000";
    Thanks in advanceadditional clues will exist within alert_SID.ora file & subsequent trace file.

  • ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource with Tbs Read-only

    Hi all,
    We're using Oracle 10.2.0.1 and 9.2.0.4.
    I'm testing the performing of a procedure that inserts, like this:
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE P$TAD_TEST
    IS
    TYPE T_T1_C1          IS TABLE OF T1.C1%TYPE INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
    TYPE T_T1_DT           IS TABLE OF T1.DT%TYPE INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
    P_C1 T_T1_C1;
    P_DT T_T1_DT;
    P_RESULT NUMBER;
    BEGIN
    FOR j IN 1..4032 LOOP
    P_C1(j) := j;
    P_DT(j) := SYSDATE + (j/24/60);
    END LOOP;
    FORALL i IN P_C1.FIRST..P_C1.LAST SAVE EXCEPTIONS
    INSERT INTO T1 VALUES (P_C1(i), P_DT(i));
    EXCEPTION
    WHEN OTHERS THEN
    P_RESULT := SQLCODE;
    END;
    The table T1 is partitioned across 10 tablespaces. The test consist to take
    these tablespace read-only and perform the procedure, and analyze the results,
    like erros.
    but when I perform the procedure, The alert.log indicates the error
    ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource.
    Why this occurs only the tablespaces are read-only?
    thank you!!!!

    Hi,
    yesterday we got this error again(in fact twice) and we were able to get the trace file. It says this is NOT oracle error. i was wrong in suspecting Oracle. This is the trace file details. i dont know how to debug this. Any help appreciated.
    *** 2010-06-15 16:24:29.243
    *** ACTION NAME:() 2010-06-15 16:24:29.231
    *** MODULE NAME:(JDBC Thin Client) 2010-06-15 16:24:29.231
    *** SERVICE NAME: 2010-06-15 16:24:29.231
    *** SESSION ID:(482.4266) 2010-06-15 16:24:29.231
    DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
    [Transaction Deadlock]
    The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
    deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
    or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
    information may aid in determining the deadlock:
    Deadlock graph:
    ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
    Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
    TX-00300021-0000b52d 209 482 X 247 474 S
    TX-002a0009-00011b24 247 474 X 209 482 S
    session 482: DID 0001-00D1-0000000A session 474: DID 0001-00F7-00000008
    session 474: DID 0001-00F7-00000008 session 482: DID 0001-00D1-0000000A
    Rows waited on:
    Session 474: obj - rowid = 0000CED4 - AAAM7UAAxAAAVgSAAA
    (dictionary objn - 52948, file - 49, block - 88082, slot - 0)
    Session 482: obj - rowid = 0000D8BF - AAANi/AAuAAB+z/AAA
    (dictionary objn - 55487, file - 46, block - 519423, slot - 0)
    Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
    Session 474:
    pid=247 serial=31796 audsid=25502259 user: 62/USER
    O/S info: ....
    program: JDBC Thin Client
    application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=2546894660
    Current SQL Statement:
    INSERT QUERY1
    End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
    Current SQL statement for this session:
    INSERT QUERY2
    Thanks,
    AK

  • PS2013 - When creating a new instance of Project Server hangs in 'Waiting for resources' status

    Hi,
    I have one instance of Project Server 2013 fully operational and I tried to duplicate the instance to make some tests. As I know the issue of using the same Content Database of Project Server in the same Server Farm, I used the powershell  backup/restore/dismount
    and mount the content database to change the site IDs to avoid index duplication. The Project server database was a regular SQL backup and restore in another database.
    I created a new Web App in the port 90 as show below.
    Then I included the Content database of Project Server as separated DB from SharePoint for this new SharePoint -acme90 and I tried to create the new instance. The creation hanged in "Waiting for Resources" status.
    To make another check excluding the reuse of the SharePoint-80 I tried to create another instance both in the SharePoint-80 where is the working instance and in the SharePoint-90, everything default and again they all hanged in Waiting for Resource.
    If I try to create the instance using PowerShell I got the following error:
    PS C:\Users\epm_setup> Mount-SPProjectWebInstance -DatabaseName Test_EPM -SiteCo
    llection http://acme02/epm -Lcid 1046
    Mount-SPProjectWebInstance : Cannot find an SPSite object with Id or Url:
    http://acme02/epm.
    At line:1 char:1
    + Mount-SPProjectWebInstance -DatabaseName Test_EPM -SiteCollection
    http://acme02/ ...
    + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~
        + CategoryInfo          : InvalidData: (Microsoft.Offic...ountPwaInstance:
       PSCmdletMountPwaInstance) [Mount-SPProjectWebInstance], SPCmdletPipeBindEx
      ception
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Cmdlet.PSCmdletM
       ountPwaInstance
    All SharePoint and Project Server services are running, all App Pools and sites are started at the IIS. I could not find a hanging timer job.
    I cannot stop the hanged process or dismount the instances using Powershell since no instance created.
    How should I solve the hanging status of creation of the instance? As they are in Hyper-V I can go back using one snapshot.
    Thank you.
    Best regards, Ricardo Segawa - Segawas Projetos / Microsoft Partner

    Hi Eric,
    Thank your for your interest in this case.
    I checked for running and crashed PWA jobs and deleted all of them just after restoring the snapshot and tried to create the new instance in the new web app in port 90 (besides the existing and working instance in port 80), but again it hanged in "waiting
    for resources". There is not any timer job hanging, no error in event viewer or in log. So the error is well before working with cloned dbs.
    Answering your questiion, I am working all on 2013. My intention is backup one instance of the port 80 and copy to the instance of port 90, changing of course the url and the index of the content db of SharePoint. The process I used was:
    Create a new web app in port 90, creating a new SharePoint_Content_2 on a
    http://server:90 site.
    Created the top level site called Portal using the Team Site template.
    Create a new content db for new instance of Project Server named EPM_Content_2 using Central Admin.
    Backup content db from port 80 instance of Project Server and restore to this EPM_content_2 using PowerShell cmd.
    Dismounted and mounted this Project Server content db to create new index for existing sites to avoid index conflicts.
    Backup the Project Server DB from port 80 using SQL backup and restored as ProjectWebApp2 db for port 90 instance.
    Tried to create a new instance of Project Server
    http://server:90/pwa on web app of port 90 using the ProjectWebApp2 db and using the same app pool of the other instance. But as in the previous case, it hang out in "Waiting for resources".
    Best regards, Ricardo Segawa - Segawas Projetos / Microsoft Partner

  • [ERROR] could not find source for resource bundle modules.

    We are in the process of upgrading our flex application from SDK3.6 to SDK4.5.0.17899.
    Flexmojos version used for compilation is 3.9.
    The flex library project is complied with SDK4.5.0 version but BUILD is not getting SUCESS from maven.
    The following is the reason is showing and unable to find out the root cause.
    [ERROR] could not find source for resource bundle modules.
    Can you please help me out.
    Thanks,

    Copying
    /Software/FB\ Eclipse\ Plugin/Adobe\ Flex\ Builder\ 3\ Plug-in/sdks/2.0.1/frameworks/locale/en_US/charts_rb.swc into
    the 3.5 SDK directory
    /usr/local/lib/flex_sdk/3.5.0/frameworks/locale/en_US
    solves the problem.
    Not sure why as the charts_rb.swc comes from Flex 2.0

  • Error: could not find source for resource bundle charts

    I am trying to upgrade from Flex SDk 3.4 to 3.5.
    I have copied the Data Visualisation SWCs under libs, locale and rlsls folders as suggested by adobe.
    I get the following error when building the application
    flex-library:
         [java] Loading configuration file /usr/local/lib/flex_sdk/3.5.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml
         [java] Error: could not find source for resource bundle charts.
         [java]
    What am I missing? Any help is highly appreciated.
    Thanks

    Copying
    /Software/FB\ Eclipse\ Plugin/Adobe\ Flex\ Builder\ 3\ Plug-in/sdks/2.0.1/frameworks/locale/en_US/charts_rb.swc into
    the 3.5 SDK directory
    /usr/local/lib/flex_sdk/3.5.0/frameworks/locale/en_US
    solves the problem.
    Not sure why as the charts_rb.swc comes from Flex 2.0

  • Unable to validate security for resource 'EXTRANETLOOK'

    We have UCM 10gR3 installed. We have Extranetlook component installed along with WebDAV. Currently when the users take any action that they don't have privilege to, they come accross Unable to validate security for resource 'EXTRANETLOOK'error message. Before it use to give exact error message so that it was easy for us to troubleshoot. Recently due to some changes in the settings in the system, we started seeing this error message instead of actual error message something like Unable to retrieve page. User 'abc ' does not have sufficient privileges. Is there a way to suppress thie Extrenet look error message so that the actual message comes through?
    thanks,

    Thanks for the response Bernhard. I'd like to address some of the points you mentioned:
    possibly you have not the permissions to add resources
    -I am an owner of both the PWA and the project subsite
    there are no resources inside your project plan (you have to use the "Build Team" in the Ribbon)
    -I checked the "Build Team" list and confirmed there are a dozen users in there
    not each view allows you to edit each field
    -I've tried switching views and noticed that there are other fields that I cannot add values into including: Actual Start, Actual Finish, Baseline Finish, % Work Complete. I am able to change the Task Name, Start, Finish.
    Very strange problem. Im still doing development on it but obviously cant roll this into production when users cannot add information to tasks.

  • Error on executing See Also search - no authorization for resource

    Hi there,
    i have installed TREX 6.1 SP 13.
    It searching fine but only two bugs - 1)when i'm clicking on "See also" link in search result page - i'm getting error:
    "Search Failure
    Error on executing See Also search - no authorization for resource
    An unexpected severe error occurred during the search call.  If the situation persists, inform your system administrator."
    2) when i'm clicking on "HTML version" - sometimes i'm getting "No valid content found in store" error message, but it depends on index.
    Any ideas?

    Hello Kwong,
    thanks for responce. Only that i have in log is:
    #1.5#000F20F6A8BD006D000000060000253400040016981EA972#1125996948354#com.sapporta
    ls.wcm.control.util.search.SearchSessionBuilder#sap.com/irj#com.sapportals.wcm.c
    ontrol.util.search.SearchSessionBuilder#Administrator#41230####04c0c6201eb411dab
    6f0000f20f6a8bd#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_0##0#0#Error##Plain###Error
    on executing See Also search - no authorization for resource#
    Moreover, i'm working under administartor with all rights.

  • Project Server 2013 for Resource Planning & Project Portfolio Management

    We are looking to  use project server 2013 for resource and project portfolio management.  We are an IT department of approximately 600 growing to 1,000 within the next several years.
    We would like to us PS2013 to do the following :
    Manage Portfolio of Projects
    Manage Resources against this Portfolio
    Calculate Project Finances using resource roles and rates
    I would be grateful to have both comments on experience , both positive and negative.
    Thank You

    Many teams within organizations are turning to Project Server to help them control resources, deliverables and costs better.    It does resource management very well with work & cost resources, baseline costs, material costs, budget costs and
    out of the box earned value analysis (EV).  The Strategy (portfolio) component is very powerful and it will help you identify project that align to your objects then do what if analysis to find the right mix of projects.
    Here are a couple of things you should think about when moving to PS2013:
    1) Who will be using the tool?  If it is a mix of onsite staff, remote staff, vendors, contractors etc. you may want to think about a hosted solution.
    2) Training.  Don't assume everyone will just magically 'know' how to use the tool.  Train everyone (team members, PMs, Executives) then train them again.  It's the only way to truly get the value out of the tool.
    3) Who will manage the system?  This is not a typical application.  The right administrator needs SharePoint, Project Server, SQL Server,  MS Project, Analysis Services and SQL Report writing skills.  Please note that much of this can
    be learned by the right person but DEFINITELY find the right person.
    4) Don't start customizing right out of the box.  You will get frustrated.  Adjust your organization to the tool early on.  I know that is easier said than done but you need a realistic approach to get tool acceptance moving early.  
    5) Use workflows but don't use them right out of the gate.  Workflows are great but I suggest you wait until phase 2 or 3 to start aligning them to your business processes.  
    6) Lastly and most importantly, you must first establish your own business processes THEN  align them to the tool.  DO NOT assume the tool will create business process for you.  You must think about how you are going to initiate a project,
    how are you going to track deliverables, how will time sheets be managed, etc.  Get to a whiteboard, crack open Visio and start building and establishing your processes now.  PS 2013 is pretty flexible and usually will align well with existing business
    processes.
    And don't forget to hire a good consultant.  They can be brought in during key phases of your roll-out to add value, help you avoid risks, and provide you with best practice advice.
    Good luck.

  • Error: Request for resource at

    Hi,
    I am getting following error, Kindly help me to resolve this.
    Error: Request for resource at http://dwm3va-inst1:1111/soap/rpc by requestor from http://localhost:8080/giftCardDashBoard/GiftCardDashBoard.swf is denied due to lack of policy file permissions.
    Thanks,

    Doesn't look like a Acrobat Scripting issue.

  • External services po for resources need information till ML81N, MIRO etc.

    hi all,
    Looking for external services po for resources need information till ML81N, MIRO.
    Even  HR personnal number PA 30, CAT2, CATM  required for smooth flow.
    Internally for this HR tcodes WBS element Activity number is also involved.
    Thanks in advance for mm dudes for replys.
    Regards,
    Parameshwar.

    Hi,
    I hope as per your requirement , you have to develop some custom (Z) report or using SAP query. All the requested data are available in Std.SAP tables, you have to fetch it as per your requirement.
    You can check the std.report - ME2S for planned/actual Comparison
    Thanks & Regards,

  • PS2013 - Creating a new instance of Project Server does not run and hangs in "Waiting for Resource"

    Hi,
    In my Project Server 2013 environment I created an instance of Project Server which is running in a notebook Hyper-V Windows 2012 Server with 11 GB, 4 threds, 3 GHz, one box configuration with complete version of SQL Server 2012 with SP1, nothing trial.
    PS and SPS 2013 updated with Cumulative Update of Dec 2013.
    I want to create a new empty instance in the same port 80 with a different URL or in the port 90 creating a new web application.
    Whatever option I choose, when I try to create the instance of the Project Server it hangs in "Waiting for Resource" status. No Event Viewer, no hanged timer Jobs, all services running, all pools and sites started and I found out nothing in the
    SharePoint Logs. After every attempt I return the server snapshot to the former state.
    The Project Server and SharePoint continue to work normally.
    Any hints where should I look to solve this issue?
    Thank you.
    Best regards, Ricardo Segawa - Segawas Projetos / Microsoft Partner

    Ricardo,
    so, the only clue I can find in your posting is around the web application.
    if you want a 2nd PWA instance on the same web application (this presums you have one already, working, right?).
    all you really have to do is give it a different "pwa" name - like "Test" or some such and use a unique project database name : Test_ProjectServerData
    there is much more you could do, for isolation into a private content database for example.
    to use a different port, then you need to setup a web application on a different port and proceed as above, selecting that web app to start from.
    if the basic action of new pwa site provision is not working, then it may suggest there is something systemmically wrong with the setup.
    let us know,
    Thanks, Eric S. Pcubed

Maybe you are looking for

  • Printer Sharing Problem

    I just installed NM on 4 comps.  1 XP, 1 Vista, and 2 Windows 7.  Everything works as of now except for the printer attached to Vista will not work on XP comp.  As of now it says it needs to search for .INF file?.....Of course this is the one compute

  • Creating an automated silent install of Acrobat using InstallShield Tuner - Part 1

    For anyone who has tried to use the InstallShield Tuner application you'll know how buggy the program is and be aware of the lack of support from Adobe. After 4 months working on and off I managed to get a (mostly) working silent install. I thought I

  • Cisco Any Connect: Works fine but can't download file

    Hello! Here's my question: I search for documents in a database over a remote vpn using Cisco Any Connect. Works fine. I receive  a result, a list of documents that meet my criteria. I can either export to my  PC or open. If I try to export, I get a

  • Direct link to swf file in IE

    I have a setup where i am trying to make a hyperlink on a page that is to a youtube swf video load in an iframe on the same page. It is working successfully in firefox, but in IE it just gives an option to download the file and doesn't load it in the

  • Post moved Connected new Samsung TV to my LAN but...

    Moved http://community.bt.com/t5/Other-BB-Queries/Connected-new-Samsung-TV-to-my-LAN-but-has-problems/td-p... If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question the