Automatic Clearing Rule for Customers

Hi,
I have a query regarding Automatic clearing rules for the Customers.
I want to clear all the debit balances against all credit balances for each customer (irrespective of the assignment). The exact amounts are not matching though.
Can this be configured for Cusomers in 'Automatic Clearing Rules'?
Please Advise.
Thanks in Advance,
Safi

Hi,
You can use the transaction code F-32 to clear debit and credit items of a customer account. You can only clear open items from one account. You can use this function to clear debits and credits that balance to zero (for example, invoices and payments that have already been entered into the customer account).
Reward points if it is helpful.
Thanks
Ram

Similar Messages

Need userexit / badi / bte to enhance the automatic clearing rules

Dear All,
My requirement is to enhance the automatic clearing rules for tcode ff_5.
Program RFEBKA00 will upload bank statement items based on the external transaction codes provided by the banks .
The standard posting rules will clear a GL bank account using a set of algorithms for further interpretation set of standard algorithms do not meet the clearing criteria.
Hence I need userexit / badi / bte to enhance the automatic clearing rules. EXIT ZXF01U01 / FEB_BADI are triggering before posting the document.
So we cannot use these. Please suggest me regarding the same.
Thanks in advance
Somu.

Hi,
Did you get a solution for this problem from any other means? Cause I am also facing the same problem. It will be great if you can help me in this regard.
Thanks
Sudheer K

Automatic settlement rules for AUC

Hi.
I want to create the automatic settlement rules for AUC settlement instead of entering the setllement rules manually.
can anyone provide me the configuration steps required for automatic settlement rules.
Regards,
Padmavathi

Hi ,
Path: Spro - controlling - Internal orders - Actual postings - Settlement - Automatic generation of settlement rules
Can anyone please provide me the details how to configure in this path and in which scenario is it useful.
Regards,
Padmavathi

FICA: Clearing rules for account maintenance & auto clearing to apply credits against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date

Hi Folks,
We have a requirement in FICA clearing rules to apply the payment against unpaid security deposit irrespective of the due date. I have the below rule configured as the first step in my clearing variant.
Grouping String: 019 (statistical indicator); Grp Rule: 3; Char Value: H (security deposits); AIRI: 4; Group: 019
Sort characteristic: 010 (Due date); Rank: 3; Char value: H; Rank: 1
I have maintained the corresponding clearing variant in all the clearing types (account maintenance, automatic clearing, and incoming payments); Clearing rule is working perfectly during payments, however for account maintenance and automatic clearing it's not applying the credits against security deposits first. I still see that the items are cleared only based on due date;
Am I missing something here? Please share your suggestions.
Thanks,
Santosh

Santosh:
This rule will not work in account maintenance. You would need to include the data about the credits into your grouping criteria in order for that to work. Most clearing rules do not work for account maintenance as they do for payments. You probably need to have a separate variant with a rule not based on statistical indicator, but rather based on transaction value or maybe create your own custom grouping via TFK116.
regards,
bill.

Automatic settlement rule for receiver 'Fixed asset' (with out IM)

Hi Experts
I am working with project settlement to a fixed asset.
I have defined a selttlement profile in which, FXA is the only valid receiver.
Please note that we do not use Investment managent and hence no automatic AUC.The predefined asset to be used for settlement.
In this situation i am unable to generate settlement rule automatically as like the case with CTR.
The below message is experienced.
"Enter a distribution rule for Asset without a validity limit"
However i have manually maintained the settlement rule with specification of appropriate asset as receiver and settled.
In this scenario, how to ensure that the settlement rule is automatically generated, any where can we refer the fixed asset?
warm regards
ramSiva

Hi,
Settlement rule cannot be automatically maintsined, you have to maintain manually, for example if you want to settle to fixed asset, how the system know to which fixed asset it should settle. You have to maintain settlement parameter manually.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Clearing Rules for Defferals

We have requirement where if the deferral date is populated in the document or item then any incoming payment should not clear that item or document in cases where deferral date is in future,
Any item with no deferral date should clear, any excess payment should be posted as on account payment,
deferral items or document should only clear if the deferral date is in the equal to or less than to system date
I need help in setting up clearing rules to support above requirement, please extend your help.

Hi,
If you are unable to get the desired result through configuration, then code custom program logic in FI-CA Event 110 to distribute your incoming payment amount.
In this Event, you can inspect for the attributes of the items to be cleared (e.g. Deferral Date greater than payment date), and decide on the amount to be posted as Payment on Account.
If you are not familiar with FI-CA Events, go into transaction FQEVENTS and read the function module documentation for Event number 110.
Regards,
Ivor M.

Automatic clearing process for consignment liability account?

Hi all,
we have to manually do a FI posting to clear the consignment liability account, but there are 2000 line items, so I'm wondering if there is any automatic clearing process like GR/IR clearing ( MR11) for consignment liability account? Or can we run a program to clear this account?
please advise.

uncheck docs which can be cleared and try , make sure test run is on.
try with other gr/ir as well just too see if this tcode serves the purpose.

Clearing rule for BRS

Hi,
can any one please tell me how BRS happens in SAP, and on which basis documents cleared after the BRS. My intention asking this question is that where we are making the settings for clearing a document. I hope my questiion is clear. Iam expecting step by step explaination.
Thank& regards
Shankar chitupolu

Hi:
Welcome to SDN..if you are on manual BRS FF67 then following is the procedure to change the clearing rules. BRS gets posted as per setting in clearing rules ..Based on assignment number or reference number BRS gets posted to main account. Hi:
Please follow as given and hopefully it will help you...
1...Go to SPRO...Financial Accounting....Bank...Business transactions...Payment Transactions...Manual Bank Statement..Create a new transaction with sign - and do not assign anything in posting rule for now and enter 15 (based on it data will be entered in assignment field) in Algorithm field , save.
2...In define posting keys and posting rules...create an account symbol for the one you did in step 1..In Assign account to account symbol please use account symbol created earlier and acc mode + and currency should be + too. In GL Account area please list the outgoing GL initials which you are using for outgoing postings..
In create key for posting rule define a posting rule and now go back to step 1 and assign the posting rule you created to the transaction type
In define posting rules please maintain posting rule as define above...in posting area assign 1. give nothing in first posting key.assign account symbol as created earlier...now give give posting key 50..give account credit Bank...and a suitable document you use for posting BRS...In posting type give 4.
Your Manual Bank statement is ready ....
Go to FS00 select your bank outgoing GL account there and in create/bank.interest tab double click on Field status group..in general data make assignment number mandatory for posting...
Go to FB50....post and outgoing transaction using the GL given above it will require you to enter assignment number enter 123 and post. In FF67 Select the new statement , proceed with your normal data entry and give the transaction you created in above , enter value date, amount and in bank ref field enter 123 as given in FB50.
Save and post it. Now it should work.
Regards
Edited by: Atif Farooq on Oct 9, 2011 6:21 PM

Automatic Deployment Rule for SCEP Definitions growing too large.

See the deployment package for SCEP definition is now 256MB and growing. How can we make sure it stays small? The ADR creating the package is leaving 26 Definition in there right now.

The method that Kevin suggests above is what is implemented as part of a default deployment template included with SP1. This limits the number of definitions in the update group to the latest eight (I think).
As a supplemental note here, whenever an ADR runs and is configured to use an existing update group, it first wipes that update group.
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

Different clearing rules in SAPF124

Hi Gurus,
usually we use the filed ZUONR as automatic Clearing rule for GR/IR account.
Now we have a Company code, which has a another Content in this field. We could use fields EBELN and EBELP.
The rules I store in customizing..are they like "and-rules" or is this like an "or" - this is because we can not set the rule by company code and of course we still need the ZUONR rule... so if it is an "and" we don't have a chance here anyway...
2.) Any suggestions how to solve it?
Many thanks in advance!
Sandra

Hi Sandra
The conditions in OB74 are "AND" conditions.
Since, we cannot set the criteria at company code level, I would suggest that you use different G/L accounts for the purpose of different criteria.
Since, COA has a vast number of G/L accounts, you can look for some G/L numbers which are not used in any other company code as of now and use them for your purpose only in this particular company code after configuration.
Regards
Sowmya

F.13 automatic clearing for vendor

Hi experts,
My business process step is :
1. Create vendor invoice
2. Create payment request
3. Run payment run
After the payment run, the clearing account for payment request and payment run is automatically cleared. But the vendor invoice and payment request is still open and not cleared automatically.
I'm thinking to have a automatic clearing to clear the invoice and payment request, but the situation is like this :
example :
I have 2 invoice, amount = 100 RM and 200 RM
I created 1 payment request for total 300 RM
How to configure the automatic clearing rules in OB74 to get those 2 invoice cleared by 1 payment request doc ?
Anyone can help me ?
Thanks,
Melissa

Hi. If you pay and invoice with reference to PO so customize Autoclearing for PO,bukrs,

Automatic Generation of Settlement Rules for PM order

Hi All,
I am doing a maintenance orders settlement and I have the fallowing issue:
My client has 2 types of equipment, namely vehicles and industrial equipment. Both have particular rules.
For vehicles, we need to control all cost by an internal order
Industrial equipment costs will be control by cost center.
So, cost center is maintained for industrial equipment, and Settlement Order for vehicle equipment.
I have a unique order type for which in Settlement profile I have entered Order and Cost Center as 'Settlement Optional' and default object type as CTR.
When I create a PM order for vehicle, system cannot generate automatically the settlement rule, because in order type I have entered default object type as CTR and in equipment I just have the Settlement Order.
But if I create a PM order for industrial equipment system create automatically the settlement rule, because cost center is maintained for industrial equipment and order type has default object type as CTR.
In the allocation structure I have a receiver category for CTR and ORD.
So, Could you help me how to generate automatically settlement rule for both cases without 2 order types?
Thanks & regards,
Hélder Nunes

hi
i think it is not possible to generate settlement rule based on equipment ,if you have specified the default settlement category in IMG ,it will be generated .
check with your technical team whether user exit IWO10027 can be mapped
regards
thyagarajan

FICA: clearing rules to applying payments against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date

Hi Folks,
We have a requirement in FICA clearing rules to apply the payment against unpaid security deposit irrespective of the due date. I have the below rule configured as the first step in my clearing variant.
Grouping String: 019 (statistical indicator); Grp Rule: 3; Char Value: H (security deposits); AIRI: 4; Group: 019
Sort characteristic: 010 (Due date); Rank: 3; Char value: H; Rank: 1
I have maintained the corresponding clearing variant in all the clearing types (account maintenance, automatic clearing, and incoming payments); However, I still see that the items are cleared only based on due date;
Am I missing something here? Please share your suggestions.
Thanks,
Santosh
Moderator update - question solved with FICA: Clearing rules for account maintenance & auto clearing to apply credits against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date
Message was edited by: William Eastman

Santosh:
This rule will not work in account maintenance. You would need to include the data about the credits into your grouping criteria in order for that to work. Most clearing rules do not work for account maintenance as they do for payments. You probably need to have a separate variant with a rule not based on statistical indicator, but rather based on transaction value or maybe create your own custom grouping via TFK116.
regards,
bill.

Automatic clearing problem

Dear All:
I am facing problem while excecuting Automatic clearing for GIR/IR Account. In F-03 i can see open item standing in GLs related to GRIR Accounts but when i run automatic clearing for them it picks up all open items and clears nothing except few. What can be the possible reason. Is there any alternative T CODE for GRIR Clearing. P

Hi,
Check the automatic clearing rules maintained in SPRO.
Ensure all the postings are done through MM and FI. If there is any manual postings then system wont clear those. For this you have clear those open items manually through F-03.(remove post automatically in FS00)
The clearing rule should be purchase document, Purchase oder item and wrbtr(amount).
In F.13 there is one option called GRIR account special prcess. Check with that option once.
Revert back still problem not resolved.
Regards,
Sankar

Automatic clearing- proportionate distribution

Hi All,
When we execute the automatic clearing using transaction code FPMA. Clearing should happen according to the below mentioned scenario-
For a business partner there are two debit open items which are $ 20 and $ 30 both the items are due on same date 01/15/2010.
Business partner made a payment on 01/16/2010 for the amount $ 10 , now the client wants the 10 to be distributed proportionally between the two debit open items when we execute the automatic clearing.
For line item $20 the amount it should clear is $ 4 (20/50)10 and for the line item $ 30 it should clear $6 (30/50)10.
I tried all the configuration for the clearing variant with grouping, sorting and clearing rules but couldn't achieve the result.
Your response is greatly appreciated.
thanks
VR
Edited by: VR_SAPFICA on Sep 17, 2010 4:48 PM

Hi,
thats difficult when I have no detailed example in a system.
You give me following example:
group 1                                                              payment
document 1      20,00       15.1.2010
document 2      30,00       15.1.2010                  50,00
group 2
document 3      10,00       20.1.2010
document 4        5,00       18.2.2010
10,00 should proportionately clearing between group 2 and group 3
group 3
document 5        8,00       18.2.2010
When you as grouping, the grouping charateristic 010 "due date" used then you receives other groups:
group 1
document 1      20,00       15.1.2010
document 2      30,00       15.1.2010
group 2
document 3      10,00       20.1.2010
group 3
document 4        5,00       18.2.2010
document 5        8,00       18.2.2010
You need a other grouping characteristic.
Best regards.
Christiane

Automatic Clearing Rule for Customers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for