Automatic criteria in Vendor evaluation

Can anybody tell me what is difference between automatic criteria and semi automatic creteria in vendor evaluation? can anyone explain me automatic criteria with some example?
Thanks and regards
sriram

hi sriram
vendor evaluation can be done
main criteria score from sub criteria
     sub criteria
           each sub criteria scores will be cal based
                1.maual
                2.semi auto
                3.automatic
if auto means u need to define points score for each sub criteria.once u define criteria for scoring based on that system automatically allot score for each sub criteria
if semi auto means u need to enter score manually at inforecord level for each  subcriteria for each operation u do in purchasing.Here u r not defigning criteria for alloting score to sub criteria u need to enter manually for each operation.
ok
can u understand that
if ok assign points me
nani

Similar Messages

  • Additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N).

    Hi,
    I like to add two additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N). Based on which vendor evaluation will be calculated.
    1. Safety/Envt Upkeep
    2. Morale
    These two are added in SPRO->Purchasing->Vendor Evaluation ->Define Criteria. But not displayed in ML81N->Vendor Evaluation tab.
    Existing criteria. 1) Quality of Service and  2) Service Timeliness are already available.
    Thanks in advance.
    Chetan Shah

    Hello Chetan,
    have you checked note 79166 "MM-SRV Hint: Vendor evaluation for service"?
    Define an evaluation criterion for services in Customizing of the vendor evaluation to be able to use the vendor evaluation also for the services management.The main criterion must contain the determination methods 'C' (determination from the quality valuation of the service) and 'D' (determination from the timeliness rating of the service) in the sub-criteria.
    Kind Regards
    TomT

  • How to add criteria in vendor evaluation

    Hi friends,
    For vandor evaluation , I wants to add 'Criteria' how can i add it.
    Regards,
    Mahesh.

    Hi Mahesh,
    Vendor Evaluation comes with the standard main criterions Price,Quality,Delivery and Services and Sub criterias.
    It's possible to add the criteria through config.
    Regards,
    Bijoy Kumar S.P.

  • Vendor evaluation using Invoice criteria

    Hi SAP gurus,
    I want to know if anybody has used de Invoice criteria in Vendor Evaluation, that is available in ERP 2005.
    The subcriterias Price Variance and Quantity Variance are automatic?
    Can we use them only with MM Module or do we need the SRM functionalities?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    SN

    Hi
    In invoice main criteria we have
          -  Quantity variance
          - Price variance
    Quantity Variance
    With this criterion, you evaluate how exactly the quantity to be invoiced agrees with the quantity actually invoiced.
    Price Variance
    With this criterion, you evaluate how exactly the price to be invoiced agrees with the price actually invoiced.
    In order for evaluation results for the two last-mentioned subcriteria to be generated automatically, you must activate invoice evaluation for the company code. In the process, you also define the maximum points score per company code.
    You can refer the documentation
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
    Thanks !
    E.Avudaiappan

  • Vendor evaluation - score working

    Hi guys,
    Does any one have any write up /info on how the system arrives at the scores of criteria and sub criteria during vendor evaluation. I am looking for detailed info all all criteria s /subcriterias.
    Also let me know how i can change the  weighting percentage for various criteria s.
    rgds

    Hi,
    Refer following links;
    [Subcriterion in Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Fully Automatic Scoring|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Scoring Methods for Subcriteria|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Calculating Overall Score/Scores for Main Criteria|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]

  • Vendor evaluation in purchase order (vendor unknown)

    Hi!
    I created 2 new evaluation criteria for vendor evaluation.
    When i go to tcode ME25 "create PO vendor unknown", I assign the source of suplly and click on "vendor evaluation" my 2 new criterias do not appear in the "Ranking list of vendors".
    Any ideas?
    Regards.

    I think the new vendor is having a different pricing schema than the old vendor. Check the pricing schema for the old vendor (in purchasing view in field 'Schema Group. vendor) and compare it to the new vendor. I think they're different.
    If it is then what i think happening is the user already input the price for the condition type in pricing schema A, then the vendor is changed and the new pricing schema is kiciking in thus making the old condition type missing.
    Try to either:
    A. Change to the old vendor back,
    B. Change the pricing schema of the new vendor to be the same with old vendor

  • Link vendor evaluation with Source of Supply

    Hi Gurus,
    We have a requirement whwrein we want to have the source of supply in the purchase requisition determined automatically based on vendor Evaluation.Meaning for a particular material when i create a PR through MRP run the source of supply should be automatically populated based on the vendor who has rank 1 in the vendor evaluation carried out.Is there any user exit or BADI for the same.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Gurus,
    We have a requirement whwrein we want to have the source of supply in the purchase requisition determined automatically based on vendor Evaluation.Meaning for a particular material when i create a PR through MRP run the source of supply should be automatically populated based on the vendor who has rank 1 in the vendor evaluation carried out.Is there any user exit or BADI for the same.
    Thanks in advance.

  • Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

    Hi,
    I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
    Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
    Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
    Thanks in advance,
    Kind regards

    hi,
    Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
    Variance             Score
    -99.9%               1
    +99.9%              100
    A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
    check the following link.
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    regards
    sumit simran

  • Vendor evaluation points automatic criteria

    Hi
    How the percencetage & points are determined for automatic criteria.
    Regards
    Umapathy

    hi,
    Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
    Go to SPRO --> Materials management --> Purchasing -
    > vendor evaluation
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
    Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
    weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
    Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
    Price 1 5
    Quality 1 5
    Delivery 1 2
    Gen. service/support 1 1
    Ext. service provision 1 2
    Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
    In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
    specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
    automatically.
    You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
    form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
    Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
    Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
    An example :-
    How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
    "On-Time Delivery Performance"?
    The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
    (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
    You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
    will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
    delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
    September 15.
    In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
    the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
    effect on the score for this goods receipt.
    However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
    which the vendor will actually adhere to.
    The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
    into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
    are the movement types 101 and 105.
    Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
    If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
    but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
    in Customizing.
    Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
    time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
    not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
    that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
    bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
    for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
    conjunction with quantity reliability.
    Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
    To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
    If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
    high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
    low percentage variance:
    The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
    the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
    The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
    12 / 20 x 100 = 60
    If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
    (12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
    If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
    the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
    statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders
    Regards,
    Manish

  • Automatic Sub-Criteria: PRICE HISTORY in Vendor Evaluation

    Hello All,
    Can anybody help me in understanding what actually the following mean in Automatic Vendor Evaluation!!
    1) Effective Price
    2) Calculated Effective Price
    3) Actual Effective Price
    4) Calculated Effective Price for a particular Vendor
    I see all this in the following link
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cf8414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
    Under "How the System computes Scores:"
    Under "Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria:Overview"
    Under "Price History (Main Criterion "Price")"
    Thanks

    Hi ZEYNEP,
    1) Effective price - End price after taking all conditions (for example, cash discounts, delivery costs etc.)  into account.
    2) Total Price - Price arrived at after taking all discounts and surcharges into account
    3) Total value = total quantity x price
    When a price changes, the value of the stock changes, since the value is calculated from the price:
    4) Effective (actual) price: Net price minus cash discount and plus miscellaneous provisions and delivery costs as well as non-deductible input tax
    In simple - Total Cost - Expenditure on material till Goods Receipt (Procurement) and Effective cost - including all expenses till delivery from factory or some times till reach the consumer (vary depend upon the nature of business).
    Here is an example
    Material Price is $ 1000/-
    & Discount is 10% and tax is 10% and freight is $ 50/-,Fixed( it may also %)
    So Here the Material Price is called Gross Price $ 1000/-
    Gross Price ($ 1000/-)- Discount {$ 100/-(10% of $ 1000/-)}= Net Price $ 900/-
    Here Net Price $ 900/-
    Tax $ 90/- ($ 900/- +$ 90 = $ 990/- is called sub-total)
    Freight $ 50/-
    $ 1040/-
    The Total Price ($ 1040/-) is called Effective Price.
    Hope this is helpful. Reward if useful.
    Thanks

  • Vendor Evaluation- Points for Automatic criteria

    Dear Team,
    Our requirement for ontime delivery criteria is - for delays up to 10 days from PO delivery date to GR date 100 points, 11- 15 days delay -98 points,16-30 delay -95,31-45 delay-93,46-60 delay -90 , >60 - 1 point. how to configure this points in SPRO -points for the auto matic criteria.
    Also what is the logic taken for assigning point scores for standard purchase organisation available in SAP 0001(Einkaufsorg. 0001). IF WE ARE TAKING A COPY OF THIS AND TRYING TO EDIT, SOME VALUES ARE NOT GETTING DELETED & SOME VALUES NOT GETTING SAVED.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nireesh

    Hi,
    Vendor Evaluation (t-code ME61) has the following features:
    Wighting Key: in Std. SAP two keys are given (with equal weighting & unequal weighting). Based on the criteria you have, you can either accept & follow one of these std. settings or create one for yourself in IMG.
    Suppose you select equal weighting as the key to be followed: there are 4 criteria viz. Price, Quality, Delivery and Service.
    Each of these criteria have sub-criteria for them. For Ex. Price has 3 sub-criteria: Price level, Price history and Price behaviour.
    So, for each sub-criterion, you allocate different marks (based on your business). Again, for each sub-criterion, there is a scoring method in Std. SAP. You can't create any new scoring method of your own. You only have to follow one of the 16 scoring methods given.
    Thus, the total score would come to 100 and you get vendor evaluation based on these criteria chosen.
    In your case: you have descending marks (points) for delay in delivery. So, pl. make one according to those criteria & sub-criteria. Please go through the help.notes and also some links in SCN. Regards, KrishnaM

  • Reg: Vendor Evaluation - Criteria "Delivery"

    Hi Gurus,
    I am in process of vendor evaluation in system. Confguration is maintained and I am opting for Automatic vendor evaluation and our interest is in Price and delivery. When I am doing Vendor evaluation in ME61,
    I am getting the automatic values for Criteria "Delivery" and subcriteria  "Price Level" "Price Behavior".
    But incase of delivery I am not getting any values. I checked for settings in confirguration but not able to trace why the delivery vendor evaluation is not happening.
    Pls advice on this.
    Regards,
    Venu

    Hi
    There are some settings like minimum delivery percentage which needs to be fulfilled for calculating score with respect to delivery performance.
    Check the PDF from the link, it gives you more details on how score is been calculated for each criteria and customizing settings
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Regards
    Raja

  • Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation

    Hi,
    Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
    Regards,
    Pratap

    Hello,
    If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
    report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
    What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
    Example:
    If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
    Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
    Regards,

  • Vendor Evaluation Automatically

    Dear all
            Kindly sent the related Document both configuration & end user details for Vendor evaluation.
    Urgent Please.

    Hi,
    Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing:
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
    Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
    weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
    Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
    Price                   1      5
    Quality                 1      5
    Delivery                1      2
    Gen. service/support    1      1
    Ext. service provision  1      2
    Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
    In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
    specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
    automatically.
    You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
    form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
    Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
    Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
    An example :-
    How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
    "On-Time Delivery Performance"?
    The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
    (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
    You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
    will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
    delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
    September 15.
    In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
    the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
    effect on the score for this goods receipt.
    However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
    which the vendor will actually adhere to.
    The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
    into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
    are the movement types 101 and 105.
    Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
    If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
    but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
    in Customizing.
    Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
    time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
    not included in the calculation of the vendor’s score for on-time delivery performance. So
    that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
    bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
    for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
    conjunction with quantity reliability.
    Standardizing Delivery Date Variance  - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
    To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
    If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
    high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
    low percentage variance:
    The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
    the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
    The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
    12 / 20 x 100 = 60
    If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
    (12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
    If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
    the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
    statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
    regards,
    sasi

  • Vendor evaluation criteria rejects/complaints

    Hi,
        I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ?
    Also is it mandatory to use the Q2/F2 notifications types for vendor evaluation.? What if I create my own Z notification type with origin Q2 ? Will vendor eval still work ?
    Thanks

    Hi Shailendra,
                        I am aware of all these settings and have gone thru your document as well. However if you read my post carefully you will see what I am actually asking.
    "I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ? "
    My question is...how do I show all the notificaitons of type external origin when I run my ME63 report ? Right now no matter how many notifications I create and assign the the external origin, they dont show up in ME63.
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to burn my pic's to a DVD-R?

    Hi, Once again I want to thank all of you for your great help. Like I said I am a rookie at this stuff. My question is now that I have alot of pic's in my collection's from my organizer what is the easiest way to burn those pic's on my dvd-r? I have

  • Max is not able to find the database

    Hello,    I have a NI GPIB-USB-HS device and numerous pieces of test equipment that have GPIB interfaces. So I have connected the test equipment with GPIB cables and have fired up MAX to see the test equipment that I have. I have refreshed the confug

  • Cursor jumps all over when connected to projector

    Hello Hoping someone can help me with this.  I have a MacBook that I connect to a projector frequently.  Recently whenever it's connected to the projector the cursor becomes "jumpy"  sometimes it will not respond and then all of sudden it jumps aroun

  • Why doesn't my Photoshop Elements 12 launch/open?

    No matter how I try to activate PSE12, through the desktop shortcut, through program files, through old photoshop works I've saved, it will not start. I've tried reinstalling it, but it still won't launch. What's strange to me is that Premier Element

  • PS CS6 64bit New Install Freezes on Opening on New Win7 64bit Workstaton

    Hello All, Just installed CS6 on my new workstation and Photoshop; it freezes upon opening. Every other program I have installed has worked flawlessly, including the rest of the CS6 Suite and Lightroom 5. Both Windows and the Adobe Suite have all ava