Automatic Evaluation Data (Vendor Evaluation)

Hi Experts,
We have defined vendor evaluation in such a way. Price, Quality & Delivery - Automatic Evaluation and Service - Manually Entered. When we do Automatic evaluation thru T-Code ME61, Score of price, quality and delivery appears in the system. How can we see the backend data from which these scores derives. So that we can explain user, that the scores have come due to following data / calculation done by system in background.
Can anybody help me. Full points to helping answers.
Regards
GR

Hi GR,
In Help documentation you have the details how each score is getting calculated. We can use this documentation to explain to the client. Also you can take the help of OSS notes.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Regarding to know how the system arrived at that score, is very difficult as it calculates the score by taking all the trasactions happend for that period. And no where in the system it shows how it calculated per transaction-wise.
But if you are so determined, note down the previous score for the vendor, then do one transaction ( PO and GR). Manually Claculate the for one perticular criteria score as defined in the Help documentation. Then run the evaluation and cross check your manually calculated score to the new score.
Hope this helps you in answering your query,
With Regards,
Krishna

Similar Messages

Automatic criteria in Vendor evaluation

Can anybody tell me what is difference between automatic criteria and semi automatic creteria in vendor evaluation? can anyone explain me automatic criteria with some example?
Thanks and regards
sriram

hi sriram
vendor evaluation can be done
main criteria score from sub criteria
     sub criteria
           each sub criteria scores will be cal based
                1.maual
                2.semi auto
                3.automatic
if auto means u need to define points score for each sub criteria.once u define criteria for scoring based on that system automatically allot score for each sub criteria
if semi auto means u need to enter score manually at inforecord level for each subcriteria for each operation u do in purchasing.Here u r not defigning criteria for alloting score to sub criteria u need to enter manually for each operation.
ok
can u understand that
if ok assign points me
nani

Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
Regards,
Pratap

Hello,
If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
Example:
If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
Regards,

Report of the Evaluation of Vendor

Hello,
need to create a history report of the Evaluation of Vendor, a list of notes in your evaluation month. I wonder what is the table where this data. Can anyone help me?
Thanks,
Luiz Henrique.

HI,
The following table may help you for vendor evaluation,
ELBK - Vendor Evaluation Header data
ELBM - Vendor Evaluation Material related item
ELBP - Main Criteria for Vendor evaluation
Regards,
BK

Alternative for extractor 2LIS_02_S013 Vendor Evaluation InfoCube 0PUR_C02

Hi BW Gurus
Could some one advise me any alternative for 2LIS_02_S013 (Vendor Evaluation).
Vendor evaluation data is required for my customer.
At present 0PUR_C02 (Vendor evaluation) deactivated. due to miss match of fields S013, S013BIW1 and S013BIW2.
We are facing MIGO posting error update terminated. Now i had deactivated S013 at LBW0.
We already tried as per SAP note Note 115192 and 818652.
But thre is no use.
Look forward to your valuble replays and points will be awareded .
Thankyou

Hi,
There is no alternative alternative for 2LIS_02_S013 to upload the cube 0PUR_C02
But I hope, we can replace the cube 0PUR_C02 with 0PUR_C05 .0PUR_C05 gets the data by the data source 0MM_PUR_VE_01.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e7/daba37d4c2503ee10000009b38f842/frameset.htm
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Link vendor evaluation with Source of Supply

Hi Gurus,
We have a requirement whwrein we want to have the source of supply in the purchase requisition determined automatically based on vendor Evaluation.Meaning for a particular material when i create a PR through MRP run the source of supply should be automatically populated based on the vendor who has rank 1 in the vendor evaluation carried out.Is there any user exit or BADI for the same.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Gurus,
We have a requirement whwrein we want to have the source of supply in the purchase requisition determined automatically based on vendor Evaluation.Meaning for a particular material when i create a PR through MRP run the source of supply should be automatically populated based on the vendor who has rank 1 in the vendor evaluation carried out.Is there any user exit or BADI for the same.
Thanks in advance.

ME6G - Vendor Evaluation in Background

Dear Gurus,
Can explain me this transcation ME6G - Vendor Evaluation in Background . How to execute this by steps?
Please advice me
THanks
Rs

Dear,
You can evaluate your vendors on a regular basis by means of background processing. The Evaluation in the Background function can be found in the Purchasing menu.
If you want to start a background processing request for vendor evaluation, you need a variant (to limit the number of vendors to be evaluated, for example).
Maintaining and Displaying Variants
When you invoke the Evaluation in the Background function, you can display existing variants in editing mode of the step list, and create new variants or change existing ones.
To do so, choose Edit Steps and then
Goto Variant (to display), or
Goto Variant maintenance (to create)
Procedure
Choose Master data - Vendor evaluation.- Follow-on functions - Evaluation in the background.
On the initial screen, enter a job name and the name of the variant. Specify when the background evaluation should take place and how often it should be repeated.
Save the background processing request.
You require certain authorizations in order to carry out evaluations in the background and define new variants. If you have any queries in this connection, please consult your system administrator.
If you require more detailed information about working with background processing requests, please refer to the documentation Getting Started with R/3.
Subsequent Maintenance of Background Evaluations
In background processing, you usually evaluate vendors belonging to the same group (that is, vendors who have the same weighting key). However, it is possible that you have selected an interval that contains different groups of vendors. For this reason, you have not entered a weighting key.
To ensure that the scores are calculated correctly, you must therefore subsequently maintain the weighting key for such evaluation records at certain intervals of time.
The evaluation records in question can be determined using the analysis report Vendors Without Weighting Keys.
This function can be found in the purchasing menu under Master data - Vendor Evaluation - Follow-on functions - Vendors without weighting key
From this report you can branch directly into the screens for maintaining evaluations.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Vendor evaluation- where to put (see) sub criteria on which screen

Please can any one update on it.
Dear Friends.
I have configured vendor evaluation in following way .
1)     Price (main criteria) u2013 a) price level [60] b) price behavior [30] c)market behavior[10]
Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
2)     Quality (main criteria)- a) GR inspection [40] b)Rejection/complaints [40] c)Audit [20]
Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
3)     Delivery- a)Ontime[30] b)Qty reliability[40] c) shiping instruction[10] d) adhere to conf.date[20]
               Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
Regards,
MAhesh
Edited by: mahesh A on Jul 11, 2011 8:53 PM

Hi Mahesh,
the path is img.....mm......purchasing......vendor evaluation......maintain criterion for purchasing organizations
also please find some useful links for vendor evaluation
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/VendorEvaluationin+MM-PUR
Looking for Vendor evaluation steps
Vendor Evaluation Process
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar

Looking for Vendor evaluation steps

HI All.
Looking for venfor evaluation steps in sequence.
Regards.
Parameshwar
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jul 5, 2011 7:51 AM

May be of help
[Vendor evaluation]
[Vendor evaluation]
[Re: vendor evaluation]
Edited by: Karthik on Jul 5, 2011 1:28 PM

Confirmation date in vendor evaluation

Hi Gurus,
Can you please let me know the settings to be maintained to get a score for the sub criteria Adherence to confirmation date during vendor evaluations.
I've already maintained the purchasing org config settings like weighting and point scores for the automatic criteria.
But when I run a vendor evaluation there is no score coming out for the sub-criteria Adherence to confirmation date.
I'm using the confirmation control key One day acknowledge and confirmation category AB (Order acknowledge). Please let me know if anything is missing out
Regards,
Ashwin.

Ashwin
Our company has the same issue, did you find a solution to this problem?
Thanks
Brad

Delivary date parameter in vendor evaluation

hi
where we maintain the delivary date parameter in vendor evaluation.
nitin

Hi,
Delivery date in vendor evaluation is a subcriteria for On time delivery and its automatic (3)
Delivery date is calculated from GR from stastical delivery date in delivery schedule TAB and actual receipt date
Hope this is clear to you
BR
Diwakar
reward if useful

Vendor Evaluation - Statistical Delivery Date

Hi,
The statistical delivery date is an important field during the calculation of the on-time delivery score. (see note 310666)
After implementing a new support package this field wasn't filled up automatically anymore. Fortunately note 1039344 and 1164767 helped overcome this.
But ... in the meantime purchase orders were created and received without a statistical delivery date.
Which date / or what does sap do when calculating on-time delivery score if there is no statistical delivery date ? Does it take the "delivery date" into account ?
with regards

Use this link http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Or find on the SAP help Vendor evaluation white Paper its there.
Edited by: Prashant Prasad on Jul 31, 2009 12:01 PM

Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards

hi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance             Score
-99.9%               1
+99.9%              100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran

Vendor Evaluation Automatically

Dear all
        Kindly sent the related Document both configuration & end user details for Vendor evaluation.
Urgent Please.

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing:
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
Price                   1      5
Quality                 1      5
Delivery                1      2
Gen. service/support    1      1
Ext. service provision 1      2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
regards,
sasi

Procedures of semi-automatic vendor evaluation

Dear Experts ,
Kindly help on the exact procedures of semi-automatic vendor evaluation which includes configuration steps and other steps .
Best Regards

Hi
check this link,it may helful to you
[http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Automatic Evaluation Data (Vendor Evaluation)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for