Automatic File Sync/Transfer to PC/E-Mail etc.

Hi,
I have the following request/problem for my nokia 6280.
Some days ago I "discovered" the voice recording feature, which I now using more than 20 times a day. I send them to my secretary and she executes my orders.
Now I want to automize this file transfer. I want every time, that the phone has a bluetooth connection with my pc and the contacts and so on were automaticly synced, that this recording files also synced or better transfered to a windows drive or file directory or send by email or whatever. The main issue is that my secretary gets this files automaticly.
Any Ideas?
Thanks
HoGo

A PC app could be written using the Nokia PC Suite API to detect when a phone is connected, then copy any files (in directories/folders accessible via PC Suite) off the device and do whatever you want with them (such as sending them as email attachments).
The PC Suite API is available from Forum Nokia:
http://forum.nokia.com/info/sw.nokia.com/id/bd896b31-92ba-4624-aa9d-ebf732e7cc0d/Nokia_PC_Suite_Conn...
Message Edited by petrib on 16-Nov-2006
03:56 PM

Similar Messages

Automatic File Sync aka "use it and forget it"

Is it possible to invoke File Sync in a non-interactive way. I want file syncing to be automatic and done "under the covers" for one of our user groups. Failing that, is there any APIs that could be used to build some custom code?
John Oakley

The Auto Tool rocks. I admit it takes some getting used to. And I definitely turn off the Auto Tool locking feature in Tools > Options (in case I do need to Tab or Space). In the rare circumstance where I need some tool behavior that the Auto Tool doesn't readily provide, I just shift-right click to bring up the Tools palettes and just keep going. Plus, the auto tool seems to get a little smarter with each LabVIEW release.
And just so y'all don't think I'm biased, there are NI people who disagree...one of my teammates, in fact, who is an old-school LabVIEW guy, hates the Auto Tool and has never switched to using it. But whenever I occasionally need to use an older, pre-autotool version of LabVIEW for whatever reason, I feel totally crippled having to Tab/Space every time I need a new tool.
You should find that after you get used to it, the Auto Tool speeds up your LabVIEW programming tremendously.
-D
Message Edited by Darren on 03-15-2006 05:17 PM
Darren Nattinger, CLA
LabVIEW Artisan and Nugget Penman

Having been without my Mac for a month I've been using iCloud mail. The new mail boxes that I set up there do not automatically show up in Mail on my replacement Mac. Is there any way to transfer them from ICloud mail to Mail?

Having been without my Mac for a month I've been using iCloud mail.on a PC. The new mail boxes that I set up there do not automatically show up in Mail on my replacement Mac. Is there any way to transfer them from ICloud mail to Mail? Thanks.

sure pretty simple. make a backup of your current settings
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1766?viewlocale=en_US
then restore device from old backup you need pics off of
then import pics to computer
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4083
you may need to save pics to camera roll first
then restore the new backup and sync pics back to phone via itunes
Peace, Clyde

The ipad wont sync and will return an error "Ipad cannot sync because the computer is no longer authorized to transfer the purchases..." But when I do a file devices transfer purchases.

The ipad wont sync and will return an error "Ipad cannot sync because the computer is no longer authorized to transfer the purchases..." But when I do a file>devices>transfer purchases. It is successful. Updated to ios7 recently. I'm facing the problem since then. I've tried deauthorizing and then authorizing several times.

Thanks Gail but ive tried that as well as logging oht and back into my accounts on my iphone and mac but I still get that message. I actually found a solution by unckecking my synced music playlist and clicking sync to remove it and then reclicked on my playlist to sync and it actually synced notmally and I got all of my new songs so I wanted to test it again so I clicked on sync again and the message once again popped up until I did the un-syncing and re-syncing again. I guess I will keep doing that in the future even though its annoying but its better than resetting my iphone.

How can I transfer all my files from Mavericks Thunderbird to Mavericks Mail

How can I transfer all my files from Mavericks Thunderbird to Mavericks Mail?
Bonjour,
C'est ma première intervention aussi je ne sais pas si je peux m'exprimer en français.
Je tente!
Lors du passage à Maveicks, j'ai basculé sur Thunderbird car je ne souhaitais pas utiliser POP mais Mail ne le permettait pas (du moins je n'ai pas réussi)
Aujourd'hui, je souhaite revenir sur Mail et, pour celà, je dois rapatrier toutes mes données de messagerie depuis Thunderbird.
J'utilise Imap et, pour gérer ma messagerie, j'ai créé des boîtes aux lettres dans Local Folsders
Le passage par Eudora ne fonctionne pas avec Mavericks.
L'import de boîtes aux lettres depuis Local Folders de Thunderbird (via le menu Fichier) ne permet de transférer qu'un seul courier par boîte aux lettres de Local Folders. Et c'est ce qui m'empêche de passer à Mail.
Merci d'avance pour votre aide.

iPhone: Transferring information from your current iPhone to a new iPhone

Was wondering if it is possible to sync the folders in mac mail on my imac to my mac book pro rather than recreating them

was wondering if it is possible to sync the folders in mac mail on my imac to my mac book pro rather than recreating them

There are two standard protocols for receiving email, POP and IMAP. In the POP (Post Office Protocol) when messages are "read" by your email client (Mail) they are downloaded and stored on the reading computer and deleted from the POP server. When you are using IMAP (Internet Message Access Protocol) the messages remain on the IMAP server until they are deleted. IMAP was created for exactly the situation you are trying to achieve. For example Apple's iCloud (formerly me.com, formerly mac.com) uses IMAP protocol. So whether I access my email on my Mac, my iPhone, my iPad, or via webmail I have access to all the files in all the various mailboxes automatically because they are all seeing and using the same online mailboxes. If I delete a message on any of the varioius devices it is deleted on all of the various devices.
Whether you can use IMAP protocol or not depends on your email host and whether they have an IMAP server or not. Many ISPs do not offer IMAP because they do not want to bear the expense of the additional disk space required to store the IMAP messages. As I mentioned before Apple's free email service is by default IMAP. Google Mail offers a somewhat non-standard IMAP service. It works with Apple's email client, Mail, but it is just a bit "different".
Personally I resisted using IMAP for years. Largely because I had always used POP and was comfortable with it. Once I got an iPhone and needed to synch my email between my computer and iPhone I realized IMAP was "the only way to go."

[SOLVED] Self-hosted file syncing options?

Relevant previous threads and/or posts:
* https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=172887
* https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 3#p1478523
I think this is where this would go (other likely sections include "Applications & Desktop Environments" and "Networking, Server, and Protection"), but if this is the wrong section, please move it.
What would you suggest as alternatives to Google Drive/Docs and Dropbox? Currently, I have Copy.com as my alternative to Dropbox, but there are a few problems I'm having with it. Right now, I'm currently considering either OwnCloud or Seafile to replace both Google Drive and Copy.com, but I'm not sure which one to pick. Alternatively, I'm also considering git-annex or pure git repos.
For the things I'm considering:
OwnCloud: Has the upside of being able to edit *.odt files inline, //but//, its editor for *.odt formatting's still pretty basic. Not to mention there's these two egregious bugs that I hope get fixed soon. Also has cross-platform clients. I currently have this on my server, but I haven't fully configured it yet after noticing those.
Seafile: Also has collaborative editing, but it's limited to markdown (which I don't mind, but it'd require me to edit the code a little bit to support the formatting I usually use with my markdown files) and *.seaf (its special rich text file format). The amount of formatting options for the rich text format is enough for me and whoever else'd be scribbling on it. Also has cross-platform clients.
git-annex: SImply because git. And non-redundant copies for the things it revisions. I wouldn't mind losing the collaborative editing, but, I won't be able to use this with my Windows laptop. I think I might be able to use this with my phone too, but I'm not sure.
An... rsync server?: The rsync protocol is ideal for this, but I haven't done enough in depth research to make sure this is right for me. I'll be sure to edit the OP after I finish doing this.
Things I've tried before:
Dropbox: Nothing wrong with it functionality wise, but Drop Dropbox has information on why I'm not using it. (and this would've worked fantastically with webodt to provide a preview to my friends of the files I have without forcing them to download it)
Google Drive/Docs: Absolutely fantastic for collaborating with other people and quickly sharing, but storing files into multiple parent folders creates a LOT of redundant copies in the export when I want to take regular backups of my Google Drive contents. Not to mention the Google Drive API for retrieving the revisions is extremely unreliable compared to how they show the revisions in the Doc editor GUI (which is flawless).
Copy.com: Nothing wrong with it functionality wise... except for their CLI client. It's kind of buggy and I use it to get public links for my files since I don't have Nautilus or Caja. I'm hoping that they get to fixing the bug for regexes in their commandline app or at least put some in-depth documentation about the limitations of the wildcards, but I have little hope for this judging by how they handled my support tickets. I also tried using webodt to serve up previews to my friends, but the sanitized HTML output prevents this.
Things that I usually sync or collab on, which maybe of note when suggesting alternatives (that either replace and/or complement) to what I've tried and what I'm considering:
Lots of plain text files from Gimp configs, notes, chat logs, etc.
Lots of images since I use it to sync wallpapers, silly pictures, etc.
*.odt files since I usually keep my stories in that format so I can edit them wherever whenever
[EDIT]: Forgot to mention that the minimum requirement for collabing and/or sharing things is to provide a public link that can be referred to in a bare html page that uses webodf.js (<- which I have made before) so I can show it to my non-tech savvy friends. Or similarly, I could construct an on-the-fly bare html page that presents the HTML for the markdown for the other shared files since not a lot of them know what markdown looks like. (Or just regularly render the markdown/odt files to html and show the link to that, though that makes storage on my end redundant)
Example: http://example.url show just a blank page
http://example.url?show=http://other.url will show a rendered preview of the file referred to in that url.
[EDIT]: Also forgot to mention that for public file linking, I'm thinking of transfer.sh for now to temporarily share copies of stories to people who don't have SyncThing or similar syncing clients installed. The last bit to figure out is how I'm going to quickly share a batch of images without having to manually re-upload them on another host. Heartbeat also looks interesting, but will have to wait four more days before testing it.
[EDIT]: SyncThing+https://ptpb.pw/ is my settled on solution for now.
Last edited by ShadowKyogre (2015-01-06 17:23:28)

Just came back from setting it up on my desktop and servier. Wow, setting it up is this easy? //And// I can have different versioning schemes for the folders I sync? Sweet! (Not to mention there's also a pluggable API for versioning, I may wanna toy with that during winter break)
I just put my WallPapers folder inside the Sync folder to test how well it handles big data, which is swimmingly (and can partly be attributed that I told the server and the desktop their IPs like in jason's blog).
I'll start syncing the rest of my things into SyncThing, then figure out how I'm going to get around the public link showing for friends and reviewers.
[EDIT]: Just got this also installed on my phone (with a custom .stignore file) and on my laptop. Both are syncing well with the current node configuration. Now just to figure out how to show random public links without the other person having to have syncthing too.
[EDIT]: Since a few days after posting this, there's also the option of https://ptpb.pw/ for the public linking that can be reused to provide a consistent, random public link for each file/batch of files. Because of this, I'm marking the first post as [SOLVED].
Last edited by ShadowKyogre (2015-01-06 17:22:42)

How to get rid of automatically created server accounts in iCal and Mail?

I have recently setup an OS X 10.6.2 Server for our small office. I got the domain name wrong in the initial install and fixed this by doing a complete clean reinstall of OS X 10.6 server (then upgrade to 10.6.2).
The problem is that one of the OS X 10.6.2 clients had been setup to talk to the server prior to the rebuild. Now on this client, I cannot work out how to get rid of or change the automatically created server accounts in iCal and Mail - everytime you login, these are recreated using the old domain name (and of course don't work).
In Mail if you remove the server account (from Accounts in Preferences), it just pops back again. I even removed every trace of the old domain name from the apple.com.mail.plist file but when I re-open Mail that darned server account (with the old domain name) just pops up again.
In iCal its slightly different in that you can remove the account and it stays away while you have iCal open. But as soon as you close and re-open it, that server account just pops up again!
I thought it might be something to do with Kerberos and found a Kerberos file on the client which had the old domain name throughout it - I changed all these references to the new domain name, but still the same behaviour in Mail and iCal.
This is doing my head in. Any ideas?
Message was edited by: davidav

I suggest you ask in the snow leopard server forum
http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=264

Automatic Active Sync failed to Start at appropriate time

Hellos,
Its holiday season here. We had a FF Active Sync process that failed to start up.
Ops noted an overheating CPU at 2am. Server was brought down.. App server stopped, Database stopped. Fan fixed and Server rebooted.. Database started Ok, App server started Ok.. according to AS Log idM started up ok... but the 'automatic' Active Sync process refused to start.
What could prevent it?!
I have seen various people's opinions.. e.g.
"Hi,
There can be lot of reasons , for not starting activesync.
if you are using activesync between SIM and database ,
then lets start from activesync wizard ,
1)check the i/p activesync form(version should be correct)
2)check the startup type
3) if you are using query based activesync
check the first and last predicate fields and you need to ensure that the logic you have used in i/p activesync form will generate some processing once you start active sync otherwise you will not see active sync in executing state.
you can check weather activesync has performed operation or not in IAPI in the debug page under configurator
if your CPU utilisation on server is very high activesync will not start
these are general things
if you can give some more specific details abt your application and problem i can help you out.
Warm Regards,
Gajanan"
This process had been left unstarted for some time. Noone checked.. why should they.. its automatic (obviously IdM isnt an R.E.M. fan)
Surely an automatic start type should (re)start after a reboot for hardware reasons!
Is the only thing we can we put in a Solaris shell script to test that these ****ing active sync process have been started and are running after a reboot/restart of App.server is a date test of the log file? i.e. if log file has not been touched in x days raise an alarm... seems something that is better built into IdM than a script.
How has this problem been faced and met by others out there? I am sure we are not the only people who have had to shutdown and restart IdM.

Indeed it does. The problem is that a log is just that.. a log of what has happened. In our case the 'automatic' AS process failed to start automatically.
We are forced to use the log and reverse apriori reasoning to detect whether the AS process actually started.
I hope you agree this situation isnt really satisfactory, is it?

HT1209 I've successfully imported the videos I've shot with my iphone5 into iphoto on my MacBookPro but they're only showing up as still shots, ie the imported videos don't play! Itunes no longer opens automatically when syncing!

I've successfully imported the videos I've shot with my iphone5 into iphoto on my MacBookPro but they're only showing up as still shots, ie the imported videos don't play! Itunes no longer opens automatically when syncing, and when I open itunes it shows that there are zero "home movies" in there, meaning that it never grabbed the videos from my phone either. What to do? Thanks!

tl:dr?
Really?
There was a short version expressly for people who weren't bothered to read a myriad of text.
Meh, not that it matters anymore. I ended up redownloading 70-odd albums, so I have the bulk of my music back. And I still have no idea what iTunes did with my files, but I'll make sure it never does it again.
I would thank you for the help but you were utterly useless. Oh well, carry on.

Wait Events "log file parallel write" / "log file sync" during CREATE INDEX

Hello guys,
at my current project i am performing some performance tests for oracle data guard. The question is "How does a LGWR SYNC transfer influences the system performance?"
To get some performance values, that i can compare i just built up a normal oracle database in the first step.
Now i am performing different tests like creating "large" indexes, massive parallel inserts/commits, etc. to get the bench mark.
My database is an oracle 10.2.0.4 with multiplexed redo log files on AIX.
I am creating an index on a "normal" table .. i execute "dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot()" before and after the CREATE INDEX to get an equivalent timeframe for the AWR report.
After the index is built up (round about 9 GB) i perform an awrrpt.sql to get the AWR report.
And now take a look at these values from the AWR
                                                                   Avg
                                             %Time Total Wait    wait     Waits
Event                                 Waits -outs    Time (s)    (ms)      /txn
log file parallel write              10,019     .0         132      13      33.5
log file sync                           293     .7           4      15       1.0
......How can this be possible?
Regarding to the documentation
-> log file sync: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/waitevents003.htm#sthref3120
Wait Time: The wait time includes the writing of the log buffer and the post.-> log file parallel write: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/waitevents003.htm#sthref3104
Wait Time: Time it takes for the I/Os to complete. Even though redo records are written in parallel, the parallel write is not complete until the last I/O is on disk.This was also my understanding .. the "log file sync" wait time should be higher than the "log file parallel write" wait time, because of it includes the I/O and the response time to the user session.
I could accept it, if the values are close to each other (maybe round about 1 second in total) .. but the different between 132 seconds and 4 seconds is too noticeable.
Is the behavior of the log file sync/write different when performing a DDL like CREATE INDEX (maybe async .. like you can influence it with the initialization parameter COMMIT_WRITE??)?
Do you have any idea how these values come about?
Any thoughts/ideas are welcome.
Thanks and Regards

Surachart Opun (HunterX) wrote:
Thank you for Nice Idea.
In this case, How can we reduce "log file parallel write" and "log file sync" waited time?
CREATE INDEX with NOLOGGINGA NOLOGGING can help, can't it?Yes - if you create index nologging then you wouldn't be generating that 10GB of redo log, so the waits would disappear.
Two points on nologging, though:
<ul>
it's "only" an index, so you could always rebuild it in the event of media corruption, but if you had lots of indexes created nologging this might cause an unreasonable delay before the system was usable again - so you should decide on a fallback option, such as taking a new backup of the tablespace as soon as all the nologging operatons had completed.
If the database, or that tablespace, is in +"force logging"+ mode, the nologging will not work.
</ul>
Don't get too alarmed by the waits, though. My guess is that the +"log file sync"+ waits are mostly from other sessions, and since there aren't many of them the other sessions are probably not seeing a performance issue. The +"log file parallel write"+ waits are caused by your create index, but they are happeninng to lgwr in the background which is running concurrently with your session - so your session is not (directly) affected by them, so may not be seeing a performance issue.
The other sessions are seeing relatively high sync times because their log file syncs have to wait for one of the large writes that you have triggered to complete, and then the logwriter includes their (little) writes with your next (large) write.
There may be a performance impact, though, from the pure volume of I/O. Apart from the I/O to write the index you have LGWR writting (N copies) of the redo for the index and ARCH is reading and writing the completed log files caused by the index build. So the 9GB of index could easily be responsible for vastly more I/O than the initial 9GB.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
To post code, statspack/AWR report, execution plans or trace files, start and end the section with the tag {noformat}{noformat} (lowercase, curly brackets, no spaces) so that the text appears in fixed format.
"Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking"
Carl Sagan

Microsoft file sync framework is not syncing deleted files

Hi,
I'trying to use Microsoft File sync framework to keep two folders in sync.
Everything works good except when I delete a file in source folder its ot deleted on destionation folder on next sync run.
I was expecting Microsoft sync framework will take care of this automatically . if not please direct me how to achieve this .
Thanks in advance,

Hi Madhulearing,
In my opinion, this thread is related to Microsoft Sync Framework forum. So please post thread on that forum for more effective response. Thank you for understanding. Please refer to the following link.
http://social.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=synctoy.
Regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

I've got music on my 4s that I can't get out of my phone. I've deleted it from ITunes and tried to manually and automatically remove (sync) and it won't come out of my phone It's gone from ITunes

I've got music on my 4s that I can't get out of my phone. I've deleted it from ITunes and tried to manually and automatically remove (sync) and it won't come out of my phone It's gone from ITunes

Well the iPod is supposed to be synced from YOUR iTunes music library, if you used other means to put music on there then the iPod is going to sync to only what's on your itunes music library when you connect it.
You need to put the files into itunes.
Far as your other issues, sounds like the drive is dying.
Check this support article for assistance
https://support.apple.com/kb/TS2380
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-10329819-263.html
search online for that number.

PC Suite File Sync

I just downloaded the PC Suite 6.84.10.3 since I have been longin g file sync for long time. Unfortunately it seems to be working only partially. Changes on my E61i files are not identified as more recent from the suite and the older PC files are overwritten on the E61i (yes, I checked the clocks and they differ of 5 seconds).
Also changes on PC files are not always recognized.
Any suggestion ?
Also would be nice to sync files in multiple folders.
Andrea

Hi,
I know, that it not going to solve your problem completely, but with my technique the file sync option is more useful.
- Create a briefcase folder on your PC. This folder will be your sync folder what you set in PcSuite to sync.
- collect all your docs, folders, pictures and so on in this folder.
That's it, your files will be synced automatically. After PcSync finished, you have to sync your briefcase folder by right click on it and choose sync all.
With similar technique you can manage your bookmarks as well if you replace your Mobile bookmarks folder in your bookmarks folder with a briefcase folder called:Mobile bookmarks.
Cheers!
Miklos Szanyi
webmaster, designer
http://www.megamobilecontent.com
Themes, wallpapers, software, tips for all mobile devices

Trying to change ownership of my old iPod. The advice here is to go to "Devices" "Summary" "Restore", but I find "Devices" does not offer "Restore" but only "Sync", "Transfer", "Backup", and a greyed "Restore from backup."

Trying to change ownership of my old iPod. The advice here is to go to "Devices">"Summary">"Restore", but I find "Devices" does not offer "Restore" but only "Sync", "Transfer", "Backup", and a greyed "Restore from backup."

What I don't understand is that your iTunes looks different from mine--just a little bit. You have 3 circles, red, yellow, and green, in the upper right end of the top bar. INstead I have a square that is half gray. When I click it, I get a menu very similar to the menu under "File."
The only place I see an entry for "Devices" is under "File," but it only gives the 4 options I mentioned before (see below). There is no "Summary."
Here's another screen shot after I added an album to music. Now all the choices under "Devices" are grayed.

Automatic File Sync/Transfer to PC/E-Mail etc.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for