Automatic Inspection lot not generated for Inspection lot origin 12

Hi all,
I am not able to trigger the automatic Inspection lot for General Delivery i.e Inspection lot origin 12.
The scenario is, I am creating the STO ( Inter company stock transfer) and against the same STO i am creating the delivery but after delivery inspection lot is not generated. In the material master correct inspection type is maintained also the mvt type 641 is active for QM. The inspection lot origin is assigned to the delivery type in the configuration but still i am not able to generate the inspection lot.
Please let me know i am missing something?
Regards

Hi,
You are missing 1 Config
Quality Management
Quality Inspection > Inspection Lot Processing > Inspection Lot Creation > Inspection at Shipping (Tcode OQL8)
mantain inspection origen agenist Delivery type u are using.
also you need to create Sales Info record(QV51)
I hope all other settings are OK then it should work
Edited by: Jayashankardm on Jan 6, 2010 9:59 PM

Similar Messages

  • Inspection lot not generated after goods reciept?

    Dear SAPIENTS,
    Inspection type 01,0101,08,89 and all activated in material master but then allso inspection lot not generated after goods reciept. Can anybody suggest here that what could be the reason.
    Regards,
    Kaushal Rai

    Hi Kaushal,
    For Inspection lot from GR, 01 Inspection type is enough.
    - Ensure 01 Insp type is active and Post to Inspection stock indicator is active for that inspection type.
    - Ensure the QM is active for 101 Movement type, SPRO>Quality Management>Quality Inspection>Inspection Lot Creation>Inspection for Goods Movements>Deactivate Quality Inspection for a Movement Type
    Regards,
    Keerthi.

  • Action log not generating for order

    Gurus
    Please check& tell me on order type which is for inspection is not generating
    Action Log can you please update
    Regards
    CHANDRASHEKHAR INGOLE

    dear all
    action log & material availability also checking not happening
    Even thought the material is in stock it creates message shortage of material
    I have set all controls in OIOI t code same as IDES
    all the settings done in custimizing in availability check for prts & material but still problem is there
    In IDES it is working perfectly
    Regards
    chandrashekhar Ingole

  • Connection has no password, -jdbc.xml file not generated for connection

    Hi,
    I'm migrating a jdev 10g web application (with EJB) to 11g, i did the automatic migration tool offred by 11g, i'm using the integrated weblogic server but it seems there is a *-jdbc.xml file missed, and it must be generated, this is the log file of the start of server :
    IntegratedWebLogicServer started.
    [Running application SAB_ADMIN on Server Instance IntegratedWebLogicServer...]
    [09:14:15 AM] ---- Deployment started. ----
    [09:14:15 AM] Target platform is (Weblogic 10.3).
    [09:14:18 AM] Retrieving existing application information
    [09:14:19 AM] Running dependency analysis...
    [09:14:19 AM] Deploying 4 profiles...
    [09:14:21 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ViewControllerWebApp.war
    [09:14:21 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelWebApp.war
    [09:14:25 AM] Wrote EJB Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelEJB.jar
    [09:14:25 AM] WARNING: Connection DBConnectionSAB has no password. DBConnectionSAB-jdbc.xml file not generated for connection DBConnectionSAB.
    [09:14:26 AM] Wrote Enterprise Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN
    [09:14:26 AM] Deploying Application...
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.065--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.user is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.user should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.driver is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.driver should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.url is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.url should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.password is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.password should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.user.Session_user.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'SessionEJB' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'SessionEJB' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.user.Session_user.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'SessionEJB' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'SessionEJB' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.bouton.Session_bouton.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_bouton' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_bouton' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.bouton.Session_bouton.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_bouton' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_bouton' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.operation.Session_operation.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_operation' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_operation' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.operation.Session_operation.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_operation' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_operation' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.user is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.user should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.driver is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.driver should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.url is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.url should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.password is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.password should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Error> <HTTP> <BEA-101371> <There was a failure when processing annotations for application C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelWebApp.war. Please make sure that the annotations are valid. The error is oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Error> <Deployer> <BEA-149265> <Failure occurred in the execution of deployment request with ID '1287044066833' for task '0'. Error is: 'weblogic.application.ModuleException: Failed to load webapp: 'SAB_CRUD-Model-context-root''
    weblogic.application.ModuleException: Failed to load webapp: 'SAB_CRUD-Model-context-root'
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppModule.prepare(WebAppModule.java:404)
         at weblogic.application.internal.flow.ScopedModuleDriver.prepare(ScopedModuleDriver.java:180)
         at weblogic.application.internal.flow.ModuleListenerInvoker.prepare(ModuleListenerInvoker.java:199)
         at weblogic.application.internal.flow.DeploymentCallbackFlow$1.next(DeploymentCallbackFlow.java:508)
         at weblogic.application.utils.StateMachineDriver.nextState(StateMachineDriver.java:41)
         Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
    Caused By: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet
         at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findLocalClass(GenericClassLoader.java:280)
         at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findClass(GenericClassLoader.java:253)
         at weblogic.utils.classloaders.ChangeAwareClassLoader.findClass(ChangeAwareClassLoader.java:56)
         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:303)
         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
         Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace

    This is the content of my web.xml file where i found the markup <servlet> and i tried to run without the first one but the error still like it was :
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet</servlet-class>
    <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
    </servlet>
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
    </servlet>
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
    </servlet>
    <servlet>
    <description>Web Service MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</description>
    <display-name>Web Service MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</display-name>
    <servlet-name>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>oracle.controll.ConnexionBaseDeDonnees</servlet-class>
    <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
    </servlet>
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>ResultatRequetePort</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>oracle.controll.ResultatRequete</servlet-class>
    <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
    </servlet>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>/faces/*</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>/adf/*</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>ResultatRequetePort</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>/ResultatRequetePort</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    Thanks...

  • Lines are not generated for holidays and sundays

    Hi
    creating a sale order shcedule lines are not generated for sunday for a particular plant .
    Schedule lines are generated for subsequent monday only.
    the plant calander  is also  correct
    with regards
    partha

    Hi
    I would really double check the factory calendar ans the  of the plant and sales organisation
    regards,
    Sidi

  • Excise Accounting document not generated for Imported Asset GR

    Dear all,
    Excise accounting document is not generated for imported asset goods receipt(MIGO)
    but "C" Register part 2 no. is generated,usual accounting document is generated for GR,
    Asset is Dr to GR/IR
    Process is
    1. Create asset purchase order with acct. assignment "A",
    2. Customs miro based on p.o.
    3. Do GR with excise
    4. Post invoice for orginal vendor.
    What will be cause of this problem ?
    How to solve this issue ?

    The above issue may be due to Accout assignmnet -A . Check your accout assignment  in spro -mm-purchasing -accout assignment - Asset A - GR Non valuated has Ticked on . If it is ticked on - No Fi entry will happen at the Time of GR .
    The reason being , if an FI entry happen for the first time , asset is capitalised . To avoid this GR is made in ur config as this .
    rewdzzzz is full if correct
    Edited by: manu m on Apr 24, 2010 11:11 AM

  • Accounting document not generating for excise invoice.

    Dear all ,
    my issue is
    accounting document not generating for excise invoice
    we are creating accounting document in J1iin
    with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
    the accounting document for billing document is generated
    so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
    please help
    regards
    Subrat

    IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India ->  Account Determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Check if the following is maintained or not
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLAAED PLA AED account
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLAAT1 PLA AT1 Account
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLABED PLA BED account
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLACESS PLA cess account
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLAECS PLA ECS Account
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLASED PLA SED account
    DLFC       CR Credit      RG23AED RG 23 AED account
    DLFC       CR Credit      RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
    DLFC       CR Credit      RG23BED RG 23 BED account
    DLFC       CR Credit      RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
    DLFC       CR Credit      RG23SED RG 23 SED account
    DLFC       DR Debit       MSUSP CENVAT suspense account
    Also IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India ->  Account Determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Check if for all Excise group u2013 DLFC u2013 Company Code combination GLs are maintained or not (especially in production client)

  • Accounting document not generating for excise invoice-please help

    Dear all ,
    my issue is
    accounting document not generating for excise invoice
    we are creating accounting document in J1iin
    with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
    the accounting document for billing document is generated
    so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
    please help

    Dear G. Lakshmipathi,
    As uknow i am getting problem when i am creating the debit memo
    so is there any specific ETT for debit memo is there .because we are not maintaining delivery type to billing type here in CIN setting
    so its not goods removal through sales . so what will be transaction type for this.
    how to check the error that why the accounting document is not generated as no error log is also comming.
    so please help me in this regards.
    Thanks with Regards
    Subrat

  • TimeStream  Error (not generated for year 1970)

    Dear Experts ,
    I am facing a problem with Time Stream .... When i try to open a Planning Book i am receiving the following message:
    Timestream (TS ZBRSNP_ZF ) not generated for year 1970
    Message no. T9507
    Diagnosis
    The date is outside the periods maintained in the factory or planning calendar (timestreams).
    System Response
    The error causes a system crash.
    Procedure
    a) Regenerate the timestream as far in the future (or possibly the past) as possible
    or
    b) Use the report ZZTSTRDELE to delete the runtime objects of the timestreams, if changes have been made to Customizing settings. For more information, see SAP Note 169885.
    It starts happen after i included Initial Column at Planning Book .... The Factory Calendar that i am using starts on 2006 and ends on 2020 .... The timestream i am using is looking for 2 years in the past and 9 years in the future.
    *The message above says that it is necessary to execute report ZZTSTRDELE but i am having some problems while donwloading SAP note. It is possible do delete it manually?  exist another way to fix this issue?
    Please i hope someone can help me as soon as possible ....
    My Best Regards
    Mauricio Filho

    Hi Sunitha,
    We have same type of problem now, could you plz adivise me how to fix this error and where we need to configure to overcome this error.
    Thanks in advance
    Sreeenivasu

  • J1INQEFILE is not generating for the month of March 2011

    Hi,
    J1INQEFILE is not generating for the month of March 2011, we have executed Qefile from 01/01/2011 to 31/03/2011 then file is generating but March 2011 data is not available.
    Problem is challans were updated in the month of April 2011 for March 2011 documents, When we executed J1INMIS report with Bank Challan status, documents are coming in the report.
    As per our understanding Challan numbers and Bank Challan update should be done in the month of March 2011 but challans and Bank challans were updated in the April 2011.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Ratnam

    Hi Vara,
    Please check following thing in the system.
    1) When the Challan is created ( March month or April 2011)
    2) When the Bank challn updated for the challans
    3) If the Challan created in the April and generating returns for the month of March 2011.
    4) Check in J1INMIS report for the month posting date 01.03.2011 to 31.03.2011, if the external Challan number is appearing or not for the documents.
    5) If the Challan created in the April ask user to revere through J1INREV, and make Challan in the month of march 2011.
    Problem will solve.
    Thanks,
    Ratnam.

  • Credit memo not generated for RMA Receipt

    Hi,
    i created RMA receipt but for this credit memo not generated in AR, Manually i have run the Workflow Background Process  & Receiving transaction processor concurrent also. even though CM not generated(In AR Interface lines table also data is not available)..or else is there any possibility for cancel or return the RMA Receipt quantity?
    regards
    Balaji
    Edited by: user9122706 on May 15, 2012 9:22 PM
    Edited by: user9122706 on May 15, 2012 9:51 PM

    Dear Balaji,
    Credit memo not generated for RMA Receipt,Can u put manual credit in AR
    Regards,
    Shineee..

  • Pur req not generated for MRP element Planned order in stock reqmnts list

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    I have a problem where in MD04, pur req is not generated for the MRP element Planned order for a future date (about two months from now). Is there a specific reason? why is it not being generated? The MRP type is PD. The procurement type is F - external procurement. Can anybody please help me on this?
    Thanks
    Anusha

    Anusha,
    ??  Not sure I understand the question.  Are you saying MRP is creating planned orders instead of  purchase reqs?  Or, are you saying that no proposals at all are being created outside of two months?  Or, are you saying that the system is creating purchase reqs inside of two months, and planned orders outside of two months?
    Regardless, these problems are probably related to your MRP settings.  Try the following settings:
    NEUPL   Regenerative planning             
    1       Purchase requisitions             
    3       Schedule lines                    
    1       MRP list                          
    3       Delete and recreate planning data 
    2       Lead time scheduling and capacity planning
    on your MDBT screen.
    Regards,
    DB49

  • Inspection Lot not generated, with MIGO 561

    Hello All,
    Please help me with this issue.
    WHen i do MIGO with 561, inspection lot is not generated.
    So there is a setting in spro, if we check that, inspection lot wont be generated.
    So now in my IDES, i tried to uncheck that box.
    When i save this setting, I get the following error.
    "Fill table key for table T156Q only up to position 010".
    Please help with this issue.
    Regards,
    Piyush

    To load initial inventory in Quality stock and release it using Inspection lot  UD,   use movement type 563 instead of 561.
    With 561 movement stock is directly posted to un-restricted status. So there is nothing to be released from Quality stock.

  • SAP PM Inspection Lot not generated

    Hello Gurus
    when I create order IW31 and try to create inspection lot, inspect lot is not generated. Please help

    dear friend,
    first check in spro ,whether you assigned inspection types to calibration order type ?
    second check while creating task list did you assign inspection points ( 300 for equipments and 310 functional locations) ?
    third check whether you released the maintenance order r not?
    system will generate inspection lot if the system status is REL.
    Hope u got an idea.
    Regards,
    Pardhu

  • SAP QM-EWM - Inspection Lot not generated in ECC

    Hi Gurus,
    Need your advice with QM-EWM integration.
    We are trying to generate an Inspection lot "01" in ECC while using EWM as our Warehouse.
    Material is not HU managed so the trigger of IL should be via Good Receipt. If material is HU managed the inspection lot trigger is via Inbound delivery HU assignment.
    The following has been done:
    Material is QM active "01" not HU set up in ECC
    Material is assigned to an Inspection Plan in ECC
    We do not have QIE in place
    SLOC used does not require HU
    Below is the process.
    Purchase Order is created in ECC
    Inbound delivery is created in ECC and distributed in EWM
    GR happens in EWM and reflects in ECC
    The question now is it possible to generate an Inspection lot in ECC even if GR happens in EWM? w/o EWM the scenario is generating Inspection lots.

    Hi,
    "The question now is it possible to generate an Inspection lot in ECC even if GR happens in EWM? w/o EWM the scenario is generating Inspection lots."
    No. You need to have the QIE to trigger the inspection lot creation in ECC.
    "We do not have QIE in place"
    This is the first thing you need.
    Somewhere here in this space I thought is also a document describing how to set it up - but could not find it right now.
    Brgds
    Juergen

Maybe you are looking for