Automatic Inspection lot not generated for Inspection lot origin 12
Hi all,
I am not able to trigger the automatic Inspection lot for General Delivery i.e Inspection lot origin 12.
The scenario is, I am creating the STO ( Inter company stock transfer) and against the same STO i am creating the delivery but after delivery inspection lot is not generated. In the material master correct inspection type is maintained also the mvt type 641 is active for QM. The inspection lot origin is assigned to the delivery type in the configuration but still i am not able to generate the inspection lot.
Please let me know i am missing something?
Regards
Hi,
You are missing 1 Config
Quality Management
Quality Inspection > Inspection Lot Processing > Inspection Lot Creation > Inspection at Shipping (Tcode OQL8)
mantain inspection origen agenist Delivery type u are using.
also you need to create Sales Info record(QV51)
I hope all other settings are OK then it should work
Edited by: Jayashankardm on Jan 6, 2010 9:59 PM
Similar Messages
-
Inspection lot not generated after goods reciept?
Dear SAPIENTS,
Inspection type 01,0101,08,89 and all activated in material master but then allso inspection lot not generated after goods reciept. Can anybody suggest here that what could be the reason.
Regards,
Kaushal RaiHi Kaushal,
For Inspection lot from GR, 01 Inspection type is enough.
- Ensure 01 Insp type is active and Post to Inspection stock indicator is active for that inspection type.
- Ensure the QM is active for 101 Movement type, SPRO>Quality Management>Quality Inspection>Inspection Lot Creation>Inspection for Goods Movements>Deactivate Quality Inspection for a Movement Type
Regards,
Keerthi. -
Action log not generating for order
Gurus
Please check& tell me on order type which is for inspection is not generating
Action Log can you please update
Regards
CHANDRASHEKHAR INGOLEdear all
action log & material availability also checking not happening
Even thought the material is in stock it creates message shortage of material
I have set all controls in OIOI t code same as IDES
all the settings done in custimizing in availability check for prts & material but still problem is there
In IDES it is working perfectly
Regards
chandrashekhar Ingole -
Connection has no password, -jdbc.xml file not generated for connection
Hi,
I'm migrating a jdev 10g web application (with EJB) to 11g, i did the automatic migration tool offred by 11g, i'm using the integrated weblogic server but it seems there is a *-jdbc.xml file missed, and it must be generated, this is the log file of the start of server :
IntegratedWebLogicServer started.
[Running application SAB_ADMIN on Server Instance IntegratedWebLogicServer...]
[09:14:15 AM] ---- Deployment started. ----
[09:14:15 AM] Target platform is (Weblogic 10.3).
[09:14:18 AM] Retrieving existing application information
[09:14:19 AM] Running dependency analysis...
[09:14:19 AM] Deploying 4 profiles...
[09:14:21 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ViewControllerWebApp.war
[09:14:21 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelWebApp.war
[09:14:25 AM] Wrote EJB Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelEJB.jar
[09:14:25 AM] WARNING: Connection DBConnectionSAB has no password. DBConnectionSAB-jdbc.xml file not generated for connection DBConnectionSAB.
[09:14:26 AM] Wrote Enterprise Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN
[09:14:26 AM] Deploying Application...
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.065--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.user is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.user should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.driver is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.driver should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.url is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.url should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.password is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.password should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.user.Session_user.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'SessionEJB' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'SessionEJB' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.user.Session_user.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'SessionEJB' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'SessionEJB' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.bouton.Session_bouton.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_bouton' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_bouton' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.bouton.Session_bouton.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_bouton' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_bouton' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.operation.Session_operation.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_operation' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_operation' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.operation.Session_operation.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_operation' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_operation' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.user is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.user should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.driver is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.driver should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.url is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.url should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.password is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.password should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Error> <HTTP> <BEA-101371> <There was a failure when processing annotations for application C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelWebApp.war. Please make sure that the annotations are valid. The error is oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Error> <Deployer> <BEA-149265> <Failure occurred in the execution of deployment request with ID '1287044066833' for task '0'. Error is: 'weblogic.application.ModuleException: Failed to load webapp: 'SAB_CRUD-Model-context-root''
weblogic.application.ModuleException: Failed to load webapp: 'SAB_CRUD-Model-context-root'
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppModule.prepare(WebAppModule.java:404)
at weblogic.application.internal.flow.ScopedModuleDriver.prepare(ScopedModuleDriver.java:180)
at weblogic.application.internal.flow.ModuleListenerInvoker.prepare(ModuleListenerInvoker.java:199)
at weblogic.application.internal.flow.DeploymentCallbackFlow$1.next(DeploymentCallbackFlow.java:508)
at weblogic.application.utils.StateMachineDriver.nextState(StateMachineDriver.java:41)
Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
Caused By: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet
at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findLocalClass(GenericClassLoader.java:280)
at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findClass(GenericClassLoader.java:253)
at weblogic.utils.classloaders.ChangeAwareClassLoader.findClass(ChangeAwareClassLoader.java:56)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:303)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
Truncated. see log file for complete stacktraceThis is the content of my web.xml file where i found the markup <servlet> and i tried to run without the first one but the error still like it was :
<servlet>
<servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<description>Web Service MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</description>
<display-name>Web Service MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</display-name>
<servlet-name>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>oracle.controll.ConnexionBaseDeDonnees</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>ResultatRequetePort</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>oracle.controll.ResultatRequete</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/faces/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/adf/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>ResultatRequetePort</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/ResultatRequetePort</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
Thanks... -
Lines are not generated for holidays and sundays
Hi
creating a sale order shcedule lines are not generated for sunday for a particular plant .
Schedule lines are generated for subsequent monday only.
the plant calander is also correct
with regards
parthaHi
I would really double check the factory calendar ans the of the plant and sales organisation
regards,
Sidi -
Excise Accounting document not generated for Imported Asset GR
Dear all,
Excise accounting document is not generated for imported asset goods receipt(MIGO)
but "C" Register part 2 no. is generated,usual accounting document is generated for GR,
Asset is Dr to GR/IR
Process is
1. Create asset purchase order with acct. assignment "A",
2. Customs miro based on p.o.
3. Do GR with excise
4. Post invoice for orginal vendor.
What will be cause of this problem ?
How to solve this issue ?The above issue may be due to Accout assignmnet -A . Check your accout assignment in spro -mm-purchasing -accout assignment - Asset A - GR Non valuated has Ticked on . If it is ticked on - No Fi entry will happen at the Time of GR .
The reason being , if an FI entry happen for the first time , asset is capitalised . To avoid this GR is made in ur config as this .
rewdzzzz is full if correct
Edited by: manu m on Apr 24, 2010 11:11 AM -
Accounting document not generating for excise invoice.
Dear all ,
my issue is
accounting document not generating for excise invoice
we are creating accounting document in J1iin
with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
the accounting document for billing document is generated
so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
please help
regards
SubratIMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
Check if the following is maintained or not
DLFC CR Credit PLAAED PLA AED account
DLFC CR Credit PLAAT1 PLA AT1 Account
DLFC CR Credit PLABED PLA BED account
DLFC CR Credit PLACESS PLA cess account
DLFC CR Credit PLAECS PLA ECS Account
DLFC CR Credit PLASED PLA SED account
DLFC CR Credit RG23AED RG 23 AED account
DLFC CR Credit RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
DLFC CR Credit RG23BED RG 23 BED account
DLFC CR Credit RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
DLFC CR Credit RG23SED RG 23 SED account
DLFC DR Debit MSUSP CENVAT suspense account
Also IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
Check if for all Excise group u2013 DLFC u2013 Company Code combination GLs are maintained or not (especially in production client) -
Accounting document not generating for excise invoice-please help
Dear all ,
my issue is
accounting document not generating for excise invoice
we are creating accounting document in J1iin
with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
the accounting document for billing document is generated
so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
please helpDear G. Lakshmipathi,
As uknow i am getting problem when i am creating the debit memo
so is there any specific ETT for debit memo is there .because we are not maintaining delivery type to billing type here in CIN setting
so its not goods removal through sales . so what will be transaction type for this.
how to check the error that why the accounting document is not generated as no error log is also comming.
so please help me in this regards.
Thanks with Regards
Subrat -
TimeStream Error (not generated for year 1970)
Dear Experts ,
I am facing a problem with Time Stream .... When i try to open a Planning Book i am receiving the following message:
Timestream (TS ZBRSNP_ZF ) not generated for year 1970
Message no. T9507
Diagnosis
The date is outside the periods maintained in the factory or planning calendar (timestreams).
System Response
The error causes a system crash.
Procedure
a) Regenerate the timestream as far in the future (or possibly the past) as possible
or
b) Use the report ZZTSTRDELE to delete the runtime objects of the timestreams, if changes have been made to Customizing settings. For more information, see SAP Note 169885.
It starts happen after i included Initial Column at Planning Book .... The Factory Calendar that i am using starts on 2006 and ends on 2020 .... The timestream i am using is looking for 2 years in the past and 9 years in the future.
*The message above says that it is necessary to execute report ZZTSTRDELE but i am having some problems while donwloading SAP note. It is possible do delete it manually? exist another way to fix this issue?
Please i hope someone can help me as soon as possible ....
My Best Regards
Mauricio FilhoHi Sunitha,
We have same type of problem now, could you plz adivise me how to fix this error and where we need to configure to overcome this error.
Thanks in advance
Sreeenivasu -
J1INQEFILE is not generating for the month of March 2011
Hi,
J1INQEFILE is not generating for the month of March 2011, we have executed Qefile from 01/01/2011 to 31/03/2011 then file is generating but March 2011 data is not available.
Problem is challans were updated in the month of April 2011 for March 2011 documents, When we executed J1INMIS report with Bank Challan status, documents are coming in the report.
As per our understanding Challan numbers and Bank Challan update should be done in the month of March 2011 but challans and Bank challans were updated in the April 2011.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
RatnamHi Vara,
Please check following thing in the system.
1) When the Challan is created ( March month or April 2011)
2) When the Bank challn updated for the challans
3) If the Challan created in the April and generating returns for the month of March 2011.
4) Check in J1INMIS report for the month posting date 01.03.2011 to 31.03.2011, if the external Challan number is appearing or not for the documents.
5) If the Challan created in the April ask user to revere through J1INREV, and make Challan in the month of march 2011.
Problem will solve.
Thanks,
Ratnam. -
Credit memo not generated for RMA Receipt
Hi,
i created RMA receipt but for this credit memo not generated in AR, Manually i have run the Workflow Background Process & Receiving transaction processor concurrent also. even though CM not generated(In AR Interface lines table also data is not available)..or else is there any possibility for cancel or return the RMA Receipt quantity?
regards
Balaji
Edited by: user9122706 on May 15, 2012 9:22 PM
Edited by: user9122706 on May 15, 2012 9:51 PMDear Balaji,
Credit memo not generated for RMA Receipt,Can u put manual credit in AR
Regards,
Shineee.. -
Pur req not generated for MRP element Planned order in stock reqmnts list
Hi SAP Gurus,
I have a problem where in MD04, pur req is not generated for the MRP element Planned order for a future date (about two months from now). Is there a specific reason? why is it not being generated? The MRP type is PD. The procurement type is F - external procurement. Can anybody please help me on this?
Thanks
AnushaAnusha,
?? Not sure I understand the question. Are you saying MRP is creating planned orders instead of purchase reqs? Or, are you saying that no proposals at all are being created outside of two months? Or, are you saying that the system is creating purchase reqs inside of two months, and planned orders outside of two months?
Regardless, these problems are probably related to your MRP settings. Try the following settings:
NEUPL Regenerative planning
1 Purchase requisitions
3 Schedule lines
1 MRP list
3 Delete and recreate planning data
2 Lead time scheduling and capacity planning
on your MDBT screen.
Regards,
DB49 -
Inspection Lot not generated, with MIGO 561
Hello All,
Please help me with this issue.
WHen i do MIGO with 561, inspection lot is not generated.
So there is a setting in spro, if we check that, inspection lot wont be generated.
So now in my IDES, i tried to uncheck that box.
When i save this setting, I get the following error.
"Fill table key for table T156Q only up to position 010".
Please help with this issue.
Regards,
PiyushTo load initial inventory in Quality stock and release it using Inspection lot UD, use movement type 563 instead of 561.
With 561 movement stock is directly posted to un-restricted status. So there is nothing to be released from Quality stock. -
SAP PM Inspection Lot not generated
Hello Gurus
when I create order IW31 and try to create inspection lot, inspect lot is not generated. Please helpdear friend,
first check in spro ,whether you assigned inspection types to calibration order type ?
second check while creating task list did you assign inspection points ( 300 for equipments and 310 functional locations) ?
third check whether you released the maintenance order r not?
system will generate inspection lot if the system status is REL.
Hope u got an idea.
Regards,
Pardhu -
SAP QM-EWM - Inspection Lot not generated in ECC
Hi Gurus,
Need your advice with QM-EWM integration.
We are trying to generate an Inspection lot "01" in ECC while using EWM as our Warehouse.
Material is not HU managed so the trigger of IL should be via Good Receipt. If material is HU managed the inspection lot trigger is via Inbound delivery HU assignment.
The following has been done:
Material is QM active "01" not HU set up in ECC
Material is assigned to an Inspection Plan in ECC
We do not have QIE in place
SLOC used does not require HU
Below is the process.
Purchase Order is created in ECC
Inbound delivery is created in ECC and distributed in EWM
GR happens in EWM and reflects in ECC
The question now is it possible to generate an Inspection lot in ECC even if GR happens in EWM? w/o EWM the scenario is generating Inspection lots.Hi,
"The question now is it possible to generate an Inspection lot in ECC even if GR happens in EWM? w/o EWM the scenario is generating Inspection lots."
No. You need to have the QIE to trigger the inspection lot creation in ECC.
"We do not have QIE in place"
This is the first thing you need.
Somewhere here in this space I thought is also a document describing how to set it up - but could not find it right now.
Brgds
Juergen
Maybe you are looking for
-
HU create and attache to Inbound delivery through z programm
Hello, I am trying to create Handling units from a excel file (article and quantity) and then to assign HU to Inbound delivery (inbound delivery is created for purchase order),HU's are getting created by BAPI_HU_CREATE but how to attache HU to inboun
-
What's the difference between Logic Studio 8 & 9?
is it me or is the ONLY difference between Logic Studio 8 & 9 the fact the LS9 can run in 64-bit mode? I've owned Logic Studio 8 since about a year after it came out. About a year ago I got a Pro that's got Snow Leopard on it, so I installed LS8 on i
-
When I am on the website "PlentyofFish.com" and scroll down to the end of the page, the subsequent pages begin to load up and "stack up" which conceals the previous pages and contacts. This does not normally cause a problem with other websites, like
-
is there any risk of updating my iphone4s to ios6.1 without transferred purchased items to itunes library?
-
Hi, If I have corrections A, B, C and D containing changes to the same object. A was released as a transport first, B second, C third and D fourth. They go through testing and the workflow in Charm, with final approval sequence of D, C, A. D was q