Automatic posting of results

Hi all, Can results be automatically posted to a web page?

Actually you can publish the responses and embed it in your website.
Open you form
Click on the Share button in the bottom left corner
Click on Publish Responses
Click on the Publish button in the dialog
You will see a "Published" icon on the bottom bar
Hover it to expend it (if it is not already expended)
Click on "Copy embed code"
You can then use this embed code in your website. As responses are coming it the table will reflect the lastest data.
You can also just have a link to the published data (use "Copy link" instead) if you don't want to embed the data in your website.
Hope this helps
Gen

Similar Messages

  • Third party sale scenario: COGS not allowed as automatically posted.

    Dear Gurus,
    I have come across this error during execution of third party sale scenario.
    When the user enters a PO with reference to PR which is in reference to SO, one error pops up which says COGS cannot be automatically posted only.
    When I deselect the "Post automatically" tick, the PO can be saved.
    Process we are following during third party sale process:-
    1. Sales order.
    2. PR with reference to Sales order.
    3. Purchase order with reference to PR.
    4. Statistical GR with reference to PO.: COGS Dr. To GR/IR Clearing account Cr.
    5. Sales Invoice: Customer Dr. To Sales Cr.
    6. MIRO: GR/IR Clearing account Dr. To Vendor Cr.
    I have my own doubts on the statistical GR part. Can you pls. validate the same.
    Also in case of third party sale, what will be the CO object as COGS is not created a cost element. (SAP standard)
    Regards,
    Harnish Shah

    Hi
    Please check the steps for 3rd business process.
    Sales Order:VA01
    List of Sales Order:VA05
    Purchase Order with reference to Purchase Requisition: ME21N
    Inbound Delivery:VL31N Material Receipt:MIGO
    Result Recording Work list:QE51N
    QM Usage Decision:QA32
    Activities due for Shipping `Sales Orders, fast display` VL10A (VL01N)
    Post of Goods Issue (PGI):VL02N
    Post of Goods Deliver:VLPOD
    Post the Billing doc VF01 or Maintain the Billing due list-VF04
    Release Billing Document for Accounting VFX3
    Delivery Document list ZVL05
    Edit Work list for Invoice List VF24
    Output of Billing Document VF31
    Customer Payment F-28
    As per my knowledge once psot the PGI,System will upddate COGS  values.
    Regards
    asuvamsi

  • De-linking (Valuation class & GL A/c) automatic posting in Invoice booking

    Experts,
    I have a issue regarding link between FI & MM
    From what I understand,
    there is a link between Service & Valuation class
    & also a link between valuation class & GL.
    This link enables automatic FI line item posting while invoice booking.
    My question:
    1. Can we break the linkage between valuation class & GL i.e. we want to stop the automatic posting
    2. What is the effect of above
    3. Would you advise to do this .. ? Why?
    Regards,
    KPS007

    Hi,
    SAP standard process are the best business practises and it should changed only when we have genuine business problem and not for people issue.
    There are several scenarios will occur during MIGO and MIRO. For each scenario system should determine a correct Inventory account, GR/IR clearing account, Price difference account and etc. First you need to prepare an excel sheet with all your possible business scenario, valuation area/valuation grouping code and their respective GL accounts. Once you have listed out all the scenarios and correct GL accounts, you can configure the system as per your requirement. Initial home work is needed to avoid any difference in account posting. Hence try to fix the source of your problem rather than changing the best practise. Account determination is vast and it cannot be explained here but please refer the below link.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/12/1a39516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
    Regards,
    Senthil

  • Urgent : Posting Payroll results from legacy system to SAP Fi /C0

    Hi Experts,
                A client requirment is such that they have to post payroll results to FI/Co
                They are not using SAP HR- Payroll module . They use their own payroll 
                 processing system . 
                 Please tell what would be the best way of doing so 
                  Help is urgently required
    Nidhi

    To be more specific, Pavani is referring to create a new inbound - custom program, which can create IDOCs in SAP system and transfer the data to FI - CO module.
    If your client has all the infrastructure for a new interface development, like XI system or IBM - Mercator system, Out bound interface for Third party payroll system, Interface - ABAP team, then it could be planned to develop the SAP inbound interface.
    Hope this helps.
    Narasimha

  • Automatic posting of excise invoice in case of deemed export

    Hi All,
    We have a scenario of Deemed export.
    Our client want automatic posting of excise invoice at the time of billing for all scenario.
    Its working fine for domestic and export sales. But in case of deemed export system is not picking the correct excise invoice type.
    I have maintained settings in Defaulf setting for excise group and series group. For deemed export i have used separate shipping point also.
    Request you to guide in this case.
    Its urgent.
    thanks in advance.
    Full points will be awarded to all answers.
    Kind regards,

    Dear Ravi
    As you would be aware as for as generation of excise invoice is concerned, it is based on series group.  So have you maintained a seperate series group for deemed export.  If so, once again check in Default Excise Group and Series Group that you have assigned the new series group to your sales area.
    Since also you said that it is working fine for domestic and exports, it is always better to compare the settings with the one for Deemed exports.  I feel somewhere the settings is missing for deemed exports.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Posting payroll results to FI : error F5 808

    Hi all,
    While posting payroll results to FI, we have the following error
    F5 808 Field Assign. is a required field for G/L account XXXX 1111111111
    XXXX is the company code
    1111111111 is the account number
    The field "Assignement" is set to required in table T004V(field status variants) in FI customizing and they can't change it to optional.
    is there a standard way to correct this? should we implement an exit user (definition SMOD_PCPO0001)?
    Thanks
    Karim

    Check the Posting Keys and Field Status Group through tcode OB41 and also check the below thread ...
    [where can i fill the "assign." when posting payroll to GL error f5808;
    Mohan

  • Error while posting payroll results to FI -IN PY

    Dear Consultants,
    When I am posting Payroll results to FI I am able to see the + amount and - amount is equal still it giving error and when I check PCP0 it says incorrect document generated. Please do needful.
    Error message: Error in document: HRPAY 0000000094 DEVCLNT200
    Error in document: HRPAY 0000000094 DEVCLNT200
    Message no. RW609
    Diagnosis
    Errors occurred when checking or posting the document
    Reference type = HRPAY
    Reference key = 0000000094
    Logical system = DEVCLNT200
    You can find the errors in the log.
    System Response
    The document cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Remove the error in the document and create and post the document again.
    Second error message : Posting period 012 2012 is not open
    Message Text
    Posting period 012 2012 is not open
    Technical Data
    Message type__________
    E (Error)
    Message class_________
    F5 (Document Editing)
    Message number________
    201
    Message variable 1____
    012
    Message variable 2____
    2012
    Message variable 3____
    +
    Message variable 4____
    COSM
    Message Attributes
    Level of detail_______
    2 (Level of detail 2)
    Problem class_________
    Sort criterion________
    Number________________
      1
    Environment Information
    Item__________________
    000
    Please do needful, why this error is coming even though the +and - amount are equal.
    Regards,
    Naresh.KM

    Dear Siva,
    Sorry for delay in reply, as per my understanding I have done the assignment correctly, and the same arrears are coming in RT table as well as in payslip. When I checked the report RPDKON00 I have got a list of wage types assigned to GL account under Country grouping 40,
    A.Define wage type posting characteristics : I have copied arrears, carryforward wage types from their original wage types.
    Example : From Basic pay (which is using in infotype 0008)  I have copied Basic arrear wage type and basic carryforward wage type. and assigned the same in ZN42, ZN43, ZN44 and did the assignment.
    B. Define symbolic account : I have copied the symbolic account which is assigned to Basic wage type and copied the same and created new symbolic account and assigned to only basic arrear wage type which is coming in RT table.
    C .Assigned wage type to symbolic account : I have not assigned arrear wage type symbolic account to Original wge type in V_T53EL. Only Basic wage type symbolic account is mapped here.
    D Mapping symbolic account to G/L account : I have assigned the arrear wage type Symbolic account to the same GL which is assigned to original Basic wage type symbolic account.
    I have followed the same process for all the arrear wage types, and even the report RPDKON00 it is showing the same there is no error message.
    Apart from that I have created a New Symbolic account for /ZF5 and did all assignment, and assigned /ZF5 wage type symbolic account to /3F1 wage type symbolic account and GL mapping also same as /3F1.
    In Standard /552 arrear process there is no /ZF5 postings it will directly deduct the amount.
    Please suggest do I need to check any other area or how can I solve this error. kindly do needful.
    Regards,
    Naresh.KM 

  • Error while posting payroll results to FI  - Documents not getting created

    Hi all,
    While posting payroll results to FI for Dec 2011 a failure of our Production Server resulted in erroneous posting of payroll
    results. Posting run no: 1756 did not get posted at all though the run
    status shown was "document posted". The issue was resolved by resorting
    to manual posting of entries.
    Now we are unable to post payroll results for Jan 2012 for the same
    range of employee numbers for whom the manual posting was made for Dec
    2011. No posting documents are getting created.
    Kindly suggest how to resolve the issue.
    Regards,
    Sunil

    Hi All,
        I raised an OSS for the issue. SAP Support provided a solution for the problem. The solution involved cancelling a reversal which we had tried and failed followed by re posting the run no 1756. Our manual entries had to be reversed.The solution is given below.
        Please follow these steps:
    - Select the posting run 1756
    - Menu => Edit => Reversal => Reset after termination
    - After last step the status of the posting run should appear as
    'documents posted'
    - Go to transaction SM13
    - Select by user 8273 and date 02.01.2012
    - You should see an entry like this:
    400 8273 02.01.2012 15:26:57 @07\QEnqueues released@ Error
    - Select the entry and press the button 'Single test'
    - In case the system shows an error, please send the message back to us
    - In case the system shows no errors => press button 'Repeat update'
    - Then check in PCP0 and FI is the document has been correctly posted.
    Regards
    Sunil

  • Automatic posting in GL Master record

    Dear All:
                 I want to know that can automatic posting tick in GL Master be made optional for certain users. I mean i am a power user of FI,but i share my login with GM Finance so what happens whenever he wants to make direct entry into certain GLs which are not allowed direct posting,he does this by un ticking. I cant detain him. I had a solution but it didn't work it was through OB26,because it made the field disabled for all users including my boss GMIT who has full authorization of all modules. Please suggest me any solution to it.
    Regards

    Hi,
    No, there is no functional solution for this requirement. Automatic postings flag is supposed to protect the account from any posting which could be done directly to the account, no matter who's the user. The purpose is to keep consistent G/L account with its sub-ledger entries.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Automatic posting of service G/L account in contract

    Hi Gurus,
    when I make a PO with a service that have a valuation class associated the G/L account at account assignement is automatically posted. But when I make a contract this is not appening someone knows why??
    Regards
    LR

    Hi there,
    First of all at PO no posting to the GL account happens, if your scenario is service procurement then when you save tour service entry sheet at thta point sytem post the amount to the GL account assigned in your PO.
    Second, you can only enter the GL account at the PO for the account assigned PO, no provisions for entering valuation class in PO.
    You can't post to an GL account for account assigned contract but you can always control the postings by making it account assigned.
    Regards,
    Sujoy

  • Error in automatic posting

    Dear All,
    I am getting an error while creating billing doc, system not doing automatic posting because of error in account determination for tax code. I maintained condition record, and also assign the tax code to GL account (GL also not blocked). also checked all setting related to tax procedure and pricing procedure. I couldnt find the problem. Can u please share some ideas.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Take the help of FI consultant for maintaining the G/L accounts for tax codes and check the account determination in VKOA transaction, and in OBYC check the G/L account assignments.
    Regards
    srini

  • Where do I define the automatic posting of goods issue to Cost Center?

    Dear Experts,
    I found out that all the raw material consumed each time I do the confirmation of process order via CORK did not post to Cost Center.
    Where do I define the automatic posting to Cost Center for Goods issue for consumption?
    regards,
    Abraham

    Hi,
    I found out the default movement type has been predefined to 261 (GI for Order, in which it doesn't post to Cost Center).  I guess the standard system has a valid reason to set it as 261 instead of 201 (GI for cost center). 
    As far as I understand, the Process order will accumulate all the costs (direct cost - material, labour and machine hour and also indirect cost) during the confirmation (material is backflushed and fnished goods is auto-GR).  And at the end of the period, this process order will be settled its variance if there is (between the total cost credited - based on standard cost of the finished goods and actual total accumulated costs debited).
    So, my question is, by right should there be any CO posting being made to Cost Center for material consumption in the above process flow as I checked in the standard system, the material movement for raw material and finished goods have no Cost Center posting at all?
    regards,
    Abraham

  • Automatic Posting accounts not allowed when G/L Account is entered in LIPS

    Dear all,
    In order to override the standard G/L account determination when PGI a delivery, we developed a routine to write the G/L account devired by the system and populate LIPS-KONTO with the account we want to post.
    This is working perfectly as soon as that G/L account does not have the flag "automatic postings only" is not flagged.
    However, is this flag is active, we are not able to PGI.
    Do you know if this is the normal SAP behaviour?  Any suggestions if we must use that account?
    thanks!
    Fátima Pereira

    Hello,
    The situation is the following....
    Two items in the sales order with two different item categories and same movement type.
    This movement type is customized in OMWN with Account Modifier ZVA that is linked to account A.
    In case of the first item category this will be ok.
    On the second item category the customer wants to keep the same movement type but post into a different account.
    During delivery processing we created in a userexit to override the derived Account Modifier to another one that we need and retrieve that account and populate LIPS-KONTO.
    Conclusion:
    1)  If we use the standard account determination, LIPS-KONTO is not filled in and the system considers an automatic posting.
    2) If the LIPS-KONTO is filled in with a GL Account that has the "automatic postings only" set, the system apparently is considering this a manual posting.
    My question is:  Is this the Standard SAP behaviour?
    Regards,
    Fátima

  • Billing Doc Automatic posting to wrong G/L Accounts

    Hey,
    Billing documents for certain customers are being automatically posted to the wrong G/L account in my company's (4.7) SAP system. I have checked transactions OMWB and FBKP but the G/L account in question is not linked to any activities.
    Can anyone please guide through resolving this issue?
    Thanks
    Nicholas

    Dear Nicholas,
    With VKOA settings also check OKB9 settings from Costing point of view.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

  • Automatic posting

    Hi Friends,
    can any one of you help me out in resolving the below issue ASAP.
    1. Credit note for price difference
    Created Credit memo request S.O with ref to Billing document, then
    credit memo w.r.t credit request S.O,
    Now the Excise duty posting for the above is going to Excise
    duty A/C , but where as the requirement is, it should post to
    Discount A/C.
    2. Credit memo for agreements with customer(Rebate)
    Agreements will be with the customer for Value, quantity, for over
    a period of time,
    At present configuration done for Sales org, billing type, for
    Rebate
    Included rebate conditions in pricing,
    Created rebate agreement & carried out 1 complete cycle, for
    customer value agreement
    For generating credit memo every time has to go to Rebate
    agreement & check for value reached, instead is there --
    automatic triggering* *credit memo option is available?
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Sudha

    Hi Swapna,
    1.Go To Trans FBKP
    2.Select 'Spl GL'
    3.Double Click the 'Spl GL Indicator' which you use for Credit Memo Transaction.(ex.D-1..)
    4.Enter the Chart of Accounts in the popup prompt
    5.In the Account Assignment  Enter the Reconciliation Account & Spl Gl Account to which the amount will be automatically posted when you do a Credit Memo Transaction(using this Spl GL Indicator).
    Hope you are clear else revert back.
    Regards
    Andrew

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error when deploying new version of application on ALBPM 6.0.4

    I keep getting this error on our dev box when trying to deploy a new version of the application: <May 21, 2010 12:25:41 PM CDT> <Warning> <RMI> <BEA-080003> <RuntimeException thrown by rmi server: javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnectionImpl.invoke(

  • Pdf problem in mobile ios.

    I am having trouble with pdfs in mobile ios. Our pdfs are generated by a webapp and are basically a byte stream. Our app puts the byte stream as source of an iframe. When we run our app via Safari on the iPad, it opens the pdf the but cuts it off aft

  • Can't setup account on Itunes

    I bought my g/f an Ipod for christmas. She uses Windows XP and when trying to sign up for her account on Itunes it always says credit card processing is not avaliable at that time. We have been trying since Dec 22 and as of this morning it still isn'

  • Is it possible to sort template names?

    When creating a new page you choose a template from a drop-down list of templates. Is it possible to sort this list in any way? Regards Maja R. Anjer

  • Name and device

    Hi , I hope someone has an answer to the following question: I have a pseudo device that will create 24 minor node (in the attach () : for (i=0; i<25;i++) { ddi_create_minor_node(...) ) That will create: /dev/ddd0 /dev/ddd1 /dev/ddd24 My question is: