Automatic posting of With holding tax

Hi
While making an entry in TC-F-51 (post with clearing) by selecting transfer posting with clearing under (transaction to be processed) with posting key 31(vendor invoice) the following message appears.
Withholding tax information ignored.Hence the TDS amount is not getting deducted automatically.Pl. advice what i need to do.
Thanks
shivaji

Hi Shankar,
The actual scenariao is like this:
1. Provision for expenses is created with the help of a BDC program which is not the actual expenses.
Dr Expenses A/c         10,000
Cr Vendor Clearing A/c 10,000
2. In F-51, the following entry is passed:
    Vendor Clearing A/c   Dr  10,000
    To Vendor Payable            9000
    To Expenses                     1000
The purpose of using F-51 is to have a control over the Vendor Clearing a/c.
3. For TDS the following entry is passed manually:
    Vendor Payable a/c  Dr  9000
    To Vendor                     8500
     To TDS                         500.
The REQUIREMENT is to pass the TDS entry in F-51.
Kindly advise any other alternative solutions also.
Thanx

Similar Messages

  • Reg: Correction of Wrong  With holding tax  amount  Values Posted via BAPI

    Hello Experts,
    I have posted some invoices using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with With holding tax code and amount now the thing is that ..the document is posted successfully  with Wrong  With hoding tax amount data in TABLE WITH_ITEM due to this while executing t-code F-53 ( Outgoing payments )   its not calculating the with holding tax amount for the invoice .
    Now i wan't to correct ( Negate some values) the values in  WITH_ITEM table.....
    How am i going to do it..!
    Plz..experts help.
    Plz waiting for your input

    Dear All,
    this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
    I hope this helps.
    Mauri

  • With holding tax code for posting while caluclation step

    Hello gurus,
    can you let me know in the configuring check boxes what i have missed out,
    while posting vendor invoice i am not able to get the tax amount and net invoice amount.
    thanks
    Pranam

    hi,
    check in your config if u have put tick mark under the tab With holding tax posting i.e posting with payment.
    this will make you to calculate and post the tax amount during payment.
    thanks
    G.Bharathi

  • With holding tax Returns

    Dear Sapgurus,
    we are using 2 different with holding tax type one is at the time of inv posting and 2nd is payment posting which is earlier, we had created tax types and tax codes we assigned in vendor master assgined to company code and automatic posting also, finally if any vendor pay advance then we calculate tds it will post to tds g/l account, after that in sap any option how to file the tds returns.
    Regards
    Veeru

    Dear,
    Once you have posted TDS then usually at the month end you will run below transaction to complete the process..
    1. Use transcation J1INCHLN (this will club all TDS posted per section and paid)
    2. Use transaction J1INBANK (when you make TDS payment in Bank then bank will give you challan number which you have to update in the system)
    3. Use transaction J1INCERT (this will print the vendor certificate (this is usually an year end practice)
    4. Use transaction J1INMIS (this will provide consolidated report for TDS)
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi

  • With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001

    Hi Guru's,
      I have an issue, is there any impact to change the withholding tax base amount 20% instead of 10%.When I change the base amount to 20% and post a document system return error message
    "With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001".Guide me on this issue.
    And tell me the impact of previous open item documents.
    Regards
    Maruthi.

    Thanks for all,
      MY problem solved.
    Regards
    Maruthi

  • Calculation of with holding tax

    The requirement goes like this.
    We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
    And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
    Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
    Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
    I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
    Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
    Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

    Hi,
    i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
    MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
    Best regards.

  • With Holding Tax provided in IDOC FIDCC2 is not getting updated in Acc Doc

    Hi All,
    I am Posting a Accounting document in R/3 though Idoc FIDCCP02.
    This idoc has  With holding Tax info segment as E1FIXWT.  i gave all the info in this segment, like Tax code, Tax type , Withholding tax base amount (local currency) , Withholding tax base amount in document currency, Withholding tax amount (in local currencyand Withholding tax amount in document currency
    However, when the Idoc gets posted,and the accounting document gets generated the With holding tab does not get  populated in SAP.
    Please let me know your inputs, that why the woth holding tab is not getting populated with the relevant info from Idoc.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    I have the same issue. But as the idoc is generated in a SAP system of the same release I would have expected that the withholding tax data is already complete. Also are no withholding tax info populated in IT_ACCTX. There only VAT is visible. I suppose IT_ACCWT was meant.
    Anyone any idea?
    Regards
    Stefanie

  • India -With Holding Tax - Changes As per the Budget Approval

    Dear All
    Many of you are aware, there will not be any surcharge, education & higher education cess for with holding tax in Indai from 01.10.2009.
    Our client is operating seperate tax codes for Basic Duty, Surcharge and Education Cess. We have change the configuration and maintained 0% in the formula for calculating with holding tax for surcharge and education cessand we have maintained with the validity from 01.10.2009
    (ie., The above solution we thought because, we wish to maintain the same tax code and with out modifying the vendor master)
    Now, the system is working fine for all the scenarios, except the transfer of the old advances from special gl indicator to normal line item through T.Code (F-54). Under this T-code, the system is reversing only basic duty at old rates with out surcharge and cess.
    Kindly suggest the solution to reverse the surcharge and cess while doing F-54 with the posting dates as 01.10.2009 onwards
    Regards
    Anilkumar

    Please go through the SAP note 1359268 for budget changes
    also see the 1369775,1371380,1372734 for your exact requirement

  • Regarding With holding tax with CIN version

    Hello SAP gurus
    I've done all the configuration required for the extended withholding tax type-also have updated the tax type and code in the vendor master.
    How to configure automatic surcharge & education cess., With holding tax certificate . What is business place in tds.How to create remittance challan for tds.what is clearing of invoice against down payment.How to create Annual returns of tds.
    While making tds entry with miro, systeam taking dummy profit center.
    So what does configuration required for above error.
    I will assign full points
    Regards
    Divya

    Hi,
    If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
    Its not deducting again.
    Consolidate all the three documents -
    - Adv pay
    - Inv
    - Payment
    and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
    Cheers
    Raghu

  • WITH HOLDING TAX ON DOWN PAYMENT

    HI
    I am  using TCode F-47 for down payment request to be paid to vendor. In Vendor Master Record with holding tax information is activated. But at the time of processing payment against down payment request using TCode F-58 With holding tax not deducted and full down payment requested amount getting debited to vendor.
    Pl suggest me
    Message was edited by:
            Chandrakant.K Acharya

    Hi Chandrakanth
    u check once WHT settings at WHT type for Payment posting.here you remove inherit base option. for Cess claculating on TDS.
    you check once define WHT codes for cess. here you calculate  for 1% cess 0.022 % on TDS base amount or invoice amount. ex: inv: 100 , TDS 2.2 %. Cess 1% on 2.2% means 0.0220. like that you calculate.
    Then you update cess tax codes in FK02,here u  select liability option.
    Then you can use f-47. here system showing popup with Base amount,TDS & cess codes.then you save it.
    now you check with f-58. other wise you want temporly solution. go to FB02 change doc. there you can modify WHT amounts then save it.
    ok all the best
    Raj

  • With Holding tax On Down Payment not picking

    Dear All,
    I have configured with holding tax on Payment posting, assigned to vendor,company code it is working fine for invoice positng and vendor payment.
    When I am trying to post down payment f-48 the with holding tax codes selection screen is not pop-up or it calculates with holding tax.
    Why the with holding tax selection tax is not displaying.
    B.S.Rao

    Hi,
    1. Please check withholding tax type is assigned to the company code, IMG: Withholding tax>Extended withholding Tax>Company Code>Assigned Withholding Tax Types to Company Code.
    Note: also check the here the proper dates u201Cw/tax obligated frmu201D and u201COblig.to w/tax untilu201D e.g. 01.01.1900 and 31.12.9999.
    2. Go to OBWW also check the GL is assigned or not.
    3. Also check the field status of recon. account & alternative recon account assigned for special GL for down payment, fields e.g withholding tax code and withholding tax amounts etc. should not be suppressed.
    Thanks
    Javed

  • How to caculate  with holding tax using vendor number

    Dear All,
    I need to calculate and simulate the with holding tax amount before the FI document post. input should be the vendor number fisical year and the company code and the with hoding tax base abount. plz help me to do this
    regard
    nawa

    Hello,
    For a record in BBSEG you can have multiple records in the data file which corresponds to Structure BWITH which allows more than one value for field WT_WITHCD. For ex:
    BBKPF
    Field1      Field2
    a     bb
    x     yy
    BBSEG
    Field1      Field2     Field3     
    a     bb     ccc
    x     yy     zzz
    BWITH
    Field1      Field2     Field3     WT_WITHCD     
    a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD1
    a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD2
    a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD3
    x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD7
    x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD8
    x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD9
    Hope this gives you some help to proceed further.
    Best Regards, Murugesh AS

  • With holding tax decuction from T.Code F-02 with out sp. gl indicator

    Hi All,
    While making the payt to service vendor my client do not want to use the functionality of advance payt, which can be performed through T.code F-48. They wants to treat this advance payt as a normal payt to vendor but they want to deduct the with holding tax from this payt.
    I have tries to use T.code F-02 with posting keys 25 Dr Vendor & 50 cr Bank. But when i am using this posting key for vendor (i.e.25) System gives me warning message saying with holding tax information is ignored & system do not deduct TDS from the payt made to vendor.
    But when i am using PK 29 with sp gl indicator A for advances from T.Code F-02 system allows me to deduct the with holding tax against vendor paytment.
    Please guide me how to duduct the with holding tax from vendor payt. without using sp. GL indicator for advances.
    Thanks
    Sonal

    Hi
    why ur clien not want advance paymeny through Special GL, what is the issue/purpose
    see TDS deducted at the time of Advance payment and at the time of invoice
    when u use F-02 for TDS deduct of vendor without using special GL and u useing 25 vendor and 50 bank
    in this case tds not deducted here vendoir is debit but withouse advance indicator
    becuase u given vendor advance , but in this case entry not showing advance or
    in SAP Standard system TDS deducted of advance payment when u using 29 posting key for vendor this is stsndard key of advance vendor
    so convience ur clien u use Advance payment method with Special GL, if they not agree then ask what is the purpose u not using Speacial GL through Advance paument
    if any query, revert back
    Regards
    Roobal

  • With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

    Hi Friends,
    We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
    Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
    As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
    With holding tax rate is 0%,
    Based on modified net amount calculation
    and
    Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
    When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
    Which causes difference in 1099 – misc vendors
    Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
    Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
    Payment going out=
    $1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 – 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
    With holding base calculation =
    $ 1000 – 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
    Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 – 900 = 8.98
    Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
    Moreover, please tell me if it’s normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
    Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
    Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

    Dear All
    i am also having the same problem. The example is
    Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
    Input Tax @ 15%   = $  15,000
    Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
    Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
    On payment the system behavior should be
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325  ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
    However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220  ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
    this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
    Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

  • With holding tax base amount is not showing in miro screen

    Dear All
    Whith holding tax amount is not showing in withholding tax tab after all posting also.
    but with holding tax posting is going on fine. in miro screen in withholding tax tab i am not getting this value correctly but it is showing 0 value.
    help me in this regard.
    Regrds,
    Sami

    Dear Sami,
    if the WT datas are zero in MIRO/MIR4 this is due to the Standard System Design. Usually You will have the correct WT data only into the FI follow on document. Only if You insert WT datas manually (wt base amount, wt amount) these will be saved into MIRO/MIR4 as well.
    I hope this helps in understanding the System behaviour.
    Have a nice day.
    Mauri
    Edited by: MAURIZIO BIANCOTTI on Oct 26, 2009 2:22 PM
    Edited by: MAURIZIO BIANCOTTI on Oct 26, 2009 2:22 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Java Applet 6 crashes after Apple update in Firefox 8

    After my update in Apple a day ago, my Java (6.0version) and Firefox 8 do not mix. I can't open a second window without Firefox crashing. I have also "tested" my Java on the Java website and it says Java's working, then when I hit the back button, it

  • How is SessionHelper getting instantiated (in a JSP)?

    Hi,           This is kind of related to a previous post. As a result of looking into how to work with PortalSession, I found the SessionHelper class:           http://e-docs.bea.com/wlp/docs81/javadoc/com/bea/p13n/usermgmt/SessionHelper.html        

  • Sun ONE Web Server 6.0 AND jre 1.6

    I am using Sun ONE Web Server 6.0 Service Pack 11. Can I upgrade my JRE version to 1.6? Currently I am using 1.5. Your response will be much appreciated?

  • How do I disable SCC (spread spectrum clock) in Macbook Pro?

    On some PC's I can hit a key during startup, go into a BIOS setup menu, and find the option to disable spread spectrum on the system clock.  How can I do this on my Macbook Pro? Thanks.

  • Mac RDP Client throws error "TLSEndpointException: 0"

    When trying to TS into a Windows Server 2008 I receive the error "TLSEndpointException: 0".  This occurs on my Macbook running Yosemite.  However if I try to connect using another Mac, which is also running Yosemite, it works.  I can't seem to find a