Automatic price adjustment based on quality of material.

Hi All,
Please throw some light on following scenario.
X material will be received in batches, and that material will subject to Quality Inspection. (QM is activated)
While doing GR for this material, in inspection it has been found that the material quality is poor. As the requirement is critical, we want to accept that material.
But as we received inferior quality material, we want to pay less price to vendor, than agreed price.
Can it be managed automatically by the system? If so, what is the procedure, or configuration part to be followed?
Kindly Advice.
Thanks in advance.
With regards,
Prabhakar

There is no standard SAP process for this . Probably you can send a text message in 101 matl document , which appears during invoice passing . The discounting due to inferior quality has to be done manually while processing the inovice.
Otherwise it requires the development to meet your requirment.
Regards
Mani

Similar Messages

Automatic price adjustment based on material quality

Hi Gurus,
Please throw some light on following scenario.
X material will be received in batches, and that material will subject to Quality Inspection. (QM is activated)
While doing GR for this material, in inspection it has been found that the material quality is poor. As the requirement is critical, we want to accept that material.
But as we received inferior quality material, we want to pay less price to vendor, than agreed price.
Can it be managed automatically by the system? If so, what is the procedure, or configuration part to be followed?
Regards,
Naresh

It is very much possible through config in SAP QM. Go through this docu and configure accordingly:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60f03349-ff68-2e10-e592-92b18605a2fa?QuickLink=index&…

"Active Ingredients" - Price adjustment based on Quality Parameters

Hi
I have a following situation in hand :-
Material u2013 GAS (APM)
Basic Price u2013 700.00 / MMSCM (This price is @ 10,000 NCV u2013 a quality parameter of GAS)
Example we receive some 100 MMSCM GAS which is @8500 NCV.
The price here will be
700 X 8500 / 10000 = 595
Similarly there is Transport Charges which will be readjusted based on the value of NCV at which GAS is supplied.
This can be done through u201CActive Ingredientsu201D. Request you all to pls. guide how this can be done exactly in the system. Even if there is another way of doing it, pls. suggest.
Thanks & Regards
Vikas

This is very much possible. In fact dairy industry works on the same principle. The pricing takes place only after Inspection lot characteristics are posted.
This is long exercise, wherein you need to maintain certian special condition types and access sequences. You can get more information at buidling block library Link: [http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/BBLibrary_Start.htm]
Check G95: Dairy procurement.
Hope this helps.
Amit

Price list change according to raw material cost

Dear Experts,
We are currently working in a client where for those products for which the raw material is the main component as the cost of the raw materials varies with a high frequency (daily or weekly) the list price (the price we want to invoice to customers) should be updated accordingly and automatically with a specific mark up.
Have you found a similar requirement in any client? If yes, could you explain us from a functional perspective how (SAP standard functionality or custom development with a detailed explanation of the solution) you solved this requirement?
Is there any procedure to do regular massive updates of Finished Good price lists based on the actual variation (and/or expected variation) of raw materials cost?
Thanks in advance for your help.
M.Baig

Hi Baig,
It is possible to determine the price based on the raw material cost. I dont know whether you are using Moving average price or standard price for the raw material cost.
Whatever be the method, when you create the sales order, it is possible to take the raw material cost on the date of order creation using one of teh cost condition types like VPRS. You can use this condition type as statistical.
You can also have another condition type which is the mark up on this cost.
Now you can calculate your grossprice using another condition type which total up the cost in VPRS condition type adn the mark up %, either through just configuration or by means of a calculation type routine created in VOFM adn then assigning the same for the gross price condition type.
I you have any concerns, pls lemme know.

Price S and prive V in material master

Hi,
most customers ask why moving average price and standard price must be set in material master and why I cannot take as V or S price the price my vendor apply when he sells me products and why are necessary the above price ?
Regards

Hi
In the standard price procedure (price control u201CSu201D), the system carries out all stock postings at a price defined in the material master. Variances are posted to price difference accounts.
In the moving average price procedure (price control u201CVu201D), the system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price. The system automatically calculates the latter upon every goods movement by dividing the total value by the total stock quantity. Differences between the purchase order price and the invoice are posted directly to the relevant stock account if there is sufficient stock coverage.
Characteristic of Price Control u201CSu201D:
u2022     All stock postings are made at a standard price.
u2022     The system posts all differences from the standard price to an account u201CExpense/Revenue from price differenceu201D.
u2022     Exact values are available for cost accounting / controlling purposes (All goods issues, such as issues to a production order, are valuated at the same standard price. This allows better analysis of the costs of production orders).
u2022     In the accounting view, we can display differences between the delivered price and the standard price.
u2022     We can change material prices if required (generally at the end of period). This causes the system to revaluate the total stock for a valuation area.
Posting at Standard Price.
A receipt posted to a stock account is generally posted at the standard price. Differences between the order price and the standard price are posted to an u201CExpenses/revenue from price differencesu201D account (2).
Differences between the invoice price and the order price are posted to an u201CExpenses/revenue from price differencesu201D account (3).
The moving average price is also recorded in the material master when the material is valuated at a standard price. It indicates the extent to which the standard price differs from the delivered price.
Characteristic of Price Control u201CVu201D.
u2022     Receipts are valuated at their actual price (as per purchase order, invoices,...)
u2022     The system modifies the price in the material in the material master according to the delivered price.
u2022     Issues are generally valuated at the current material price.
u2022     The data used for cost accounting / controlling purposes therefore contains price fluctuations.
u2022     Only in exceptional circumstances does the system post at a difference to the u201CExpenses/Revenues from price differencesu201D account (The system makes a posting to an u201CExpenses/revenue from price differencesu201D account for a material valuated at a moving average price only in the case of a debit or credit when the stock coverage in the company code is smaller than the quantity to be debited or credited, e.g.: When we reverse an invoice, the account movements made when the invoice was posted cannot always simply be reversed. For example, if there was sufficient stock coverage when we posted an invoice with a price variance for a material with moving average price, but when we reverse the invoice, there is insufficient stock coverage, the R/3 System posts the price difference in the credit memo to a price difference account, although the price variance was debited to the stock account when we posted the invoice)
u2022     We can change material prices if required (generally at the end of period). This causes the system to revaluate the total stock for a valuation area.
Postings at Moving Average Price.
Receipts to the stock account are posted with the value Quantity x Order price. The moving average price is recalculated after every transaction and is therefore adjusted in line with delivered prices (2)/(4).
Differences between the order price and the invoice price are debited to the stock account, as the invoiced quantity is in stock (3).
The difference between the order price and the invoice price is only posted for the 50 pieces in stock. For the remaining 50 pieces that are not in stock, the difference between the order price and the invoice price is posted to an u201CExpenses/revenue from price differencesu201D account (6).

Why is elements better at photomerge than CC- CC does not appear to automatically fill image based on content but elements does when merging a panorama. Also the stitching is visable in CC but almost perfect in elements- why?

I took 6 panorama shots of a scene and used CC to Photomerge them as one. Couldn't see where to automatic blend the edges and there was 'stitch' lines when the images were merged. So i did the same in Elements 11 and it was perfect. Am i doing something wrong in CC or perhaps not doing something at all?
Any help, please?
Dave

Hi - Thanks for taking the time to reply and i appreciate the remarks- if a little harsh- we all have to start somewhere and i am fully aware of the limitations of Elements which is why i decided to add CC to my software. I can only say that if an inferior quality software from Adobe does the job well then CC must also be suited to doing the same which is why i can only think, from your comments, that i have not done something simple- however- following tutorials to get to the end result should have sufficed- it didn't so perhaps i will consider posting the difference between the two applications- and, perhaps suffer a few more 'harsh' comments. The learning curve is quite steep and i am a visual learner, but i'm also not totally incompetent:)
Kind Regards
Dave Munn
Original message----
From : [email protected]
Date : 02/02/2015 - 06:45 (GMTST)
To : [email protected]
Subject : why is elements better at photomerge than CC- CC does not appear to automatically fill image based on content but elements does when merging a panorama. Also the stitching is visable in CC but almost perfect in elements- why?
why is elements better at photomerge than CC- CC does not appear to automatically fill image based on content but elements does when merging a panorama. Also the stitching is visable in CC but almost perfect in elements- why?
created by station_two in Photoshop General Discussion - View the full discussion
First a clarification: you are not addressing Adobe here in these user forums. You are requesting help from volunteers users just like you who give their time free of charge. No one has any obligation to answer your questions.
I'll give it my best shot anyway.
Few folks in this forum are really familiar with Elements, for which there's a dedicated, totally separate forum.
Different engineering teams, also.
From this perspective, it will be difficult to give you a direct answer to your "why?" question.
Personally, I blend very large panorama shots in Photoshop proper since I can't even remember when without any issues whatsoever, up to and including in Photoshop CS6 13.0.6.
Without being at your computer and without looking at your images, I couldn't even begin to speculate what you are doing wrong in Photoshop, which I suspect you are. The least you could show is post examples from your panoramas that have gone wrong.
I can tell you that panorama stitching requires significant overlap between the individual shots, besides common-sdense techniques like a very solid tripod and precision heads.
The only version of Elements I have ever used for any significant time was Elements 6 for Windows, which I bought in 2008 to use on a PC (I've been an avid Mac user for 30 years). I found Elements so limited and so bad that I successfully demanded a refund from Adobe. IU mention this only to emphasize that I can truly only address your question from a Photoshop (proper) and Mac user point of view. I couldn't care less about Elements, but if you have comparison examples of panoramas processed in both applications, by all means post those two.
Generally speaking Photoshop is a professional level application that makes no apologies for its very long and steep learning curve, while Photoshop has many hand-holding features for amateurs and beginners.
Perhaps the bottom line is that you should stick with Elements if you personally manage to get better results there.
If the reply above answers your question, please take a moment to mark this answer as correct by visiting: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7152397#7152397 and clicking ‘Correct’ below the answer
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page:
Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed an image in your message please visit the thread in the forum and click the camera icon: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7152397#7152397
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at , click "Following" at the top right, & "Stop Following"
Start a new discussion in Photoshop General Discussion by email or at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1516624.

Price adjustment problem with gamers club unlocked

I've been told i get the 20% from GCU when i do i price adjustment but i did not after giving a called to CSR earlier in the day.
Basically i bought Little Big Planet 3 Day One Edition for $47.99 because that is the default price for me after GCU 20%.
It is currently on sale for $39.99 and i pay $31.99 automatically because i am a GCU member. So my question is
do i get the price adjustment diffrerences between $47.99 and $31.99 or $39.99(pre GCU)
Same thing with halo MCC, i paid $47.99 and its on sale currently for $44.99(pre gcu), $35.99 post GCU.
Can a mod please help me, cuz looks like the CSR already credited me incorrectly for my purchases of LBP3 if so

Hello DavidWu,
Jimmienomam explained it very well. If you click the link provided in the post you can view more information about the Gamer Club Unlocked Benefits.
You can view the information here as well.
Did you purchase the games online or in-store?
Blake|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Automatic lot creation based on time Frequency

Hi,
For 01 inspection incoming inspection ,
F or certified vendors, without inspection , material is getting posted to UUS without lot creation. ( QI info record settings).
but for this case , business requirement is to get automatic lot creation based on time like 6 months once .
Automatic lot to be created for this certified vendor on time frequency basis. how to trigger this Lot creation based on time.
Help.
VV.

Hi,
In std SAP we dont have option of generating Automatic lot creation based on periodic basis. But we can provide some workaround soultion.
Option 1:
USe Source Insepction concept. Here Inspection lot will be created for every P.O. Here u can relase P.O line items in QI07 which can sceduled in Job planning on periodic basis. Use Skip inspection lot concept to skip unwanted lots. This has direct relation with Q-Info record.
Option 2:
U can generate automatic lot creation based on Stability study concept. Here are the following steps
Initiate Stablility study
Create Initial sample
Perform intial test
Confirm initail sample
stability planning
Define storage condition
create testing schedule
store stability sample
define cycle start
schedule
complete stability study.
Option 3:
To get Automatic lot creation u can use BAPI QPL1_INSPECTION_LOT_CREATE . When a due date come for inspection,it created a lot of 01 / Z-01 inspection type automatically through QA01( call the program ,enter the inspection lot origin & material,vendor & save). Create Z-T code which has vendor material plant combination.
Execute the above T-code based on Periodic basis.
Explore above 3 options and choose best one according to ur requirements.
Edited by: Lokesh K on Oct 12, 2010 11:27 AM

Price restriction based on quantity

Gurus Need ur help
We import product which are sold to certain customers at higher price than our local products. Once the stock of import of one consignment is complete we import another one. There is a single material code for both import and local product. For each consignment of import a seperate price is quoted to the customers. We like to restrict the price that is entered in SAP at the price condition level to the quantity of the import consignment. The restriction is required to take into account all saler orders that are created with the same price.
Require your help.

Hi
you have to activate batchmanagement with automatic valuation batch ( Valuation category ) in the material master level so that parcel ( consignment ) wise valuation is possible . No need to create separate valuation type for this. here your batch & valuation type are equal. For entire parcel the same valution will occur for all goodsmovement say goods issue ( internal) . Hence you can have two/ three or multiple price valuation for single material without creation too many split valuations.
regards
Ram

Deleting of future price in accouning 1 View from material master.

Hi,
During month end process of CKMLCP, we have done the marking activity. so that the system updated the future price for all materails under specified plants. this is valid from 31.03.2008. by this time the system was not released the price automatically even, the valuation area (plant) is activated with automatic release. when doing of production confirmations for the current period, the system is throwing error as "future price and standard price exists". when we deleting the future price manually through MM02 transaction the systm is allowing to do production confirmation.
Kindly suggest me any transaction code which deletes the future price in accounting 1 view of material master, which is updated because of marking done through CKMLCP.

Hi,
Thanks for your reply,
We tried to delete the price through CKR1 transaction. after giving of parameters of material and plant blant screen is coming.
i think CKR1 is useful for deleting of future price updated through costing run i.e., CK40N marking.
But in this case when we scrutinise, this is updated through CKMLCP transaction.
after performing of "post closing" activity through CKMLCP,
i think SAP has provided another Tab i.e., Mark Material Prices. by this time the system will mark future price at current periodic cost. and at the same time there is a provision to give date either manual date or select the radio button of beginning of following period in parameters tab.there is no provision for giving of valid date upto.
may be this is useful to update the standared cost estimate with current actual.
I am also not sure why user have given data as 31.03.2008. usually they are not suppose to do this marking, but, by mistake they have performed.
Kindly correct me if any mistake and suggest any other way which will delete the future price in accounting 1 view of material master.

Automatic adjustments - Adjustment level not working

Hi all
I have got some basic consolidation rules using the rules tables but as soon as i try and control the order in which the rules are executed using the Automatic adjustments - Adjustment level field, the stored procedure produces the error below:
Any help would be appreciated
Byron
TOTAL STEPS 1
1. Execute formulas: Failed in 6 sec.
2. Legal Consolidation: completed in 6 sec.
[Selection]
(Member Selection)
Category: ACTUAL
Time: 2010.P16
ConsoScope: C_ENGEN
[Messages]
Execute formulasError
SPRunConso Version 7.0.116
Warning : Nothing Extract From Ownership for OPENING Period
*ERROR* CSD-150 Problem extracting Data : C_REPART
*ERROR* CSD-160 Problem extracting Data : C_CONSO
*ERROR* CSD-150 Problem extracting Data : C_REPART
*ERROR* CSD-160 Problem extracting Data : C_CONSO
10000015 - 2498 Rows Calculated
10000015 - 0 Rows Updated

Hi Nilanjan
I have 2 rules in the Automatic adjustments table:
In short, Rule 1 should be executed first as Rule 2 should be based on the results of rule 1.
Rule 1: Non Group part cancellation for Proportionate units
Adjustment level = 0
Adjustment type = Proportional
Rule 2: Inter-company elimination
Here the adjustment level = 1
Adjustment type = Generic
When i run the following stored procedure:
*RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE = SPRUNCONSO(%APP%, %CATEGORY_SET%,%CONSOSCOPE_SET%, %SCOPETABLE%,%LOGTABLE%)
The correct results are posted but the package displays as failed with the error message as per the first message in this thread.
The help states the following, which is exactly what i need:
Adjustment level
This field must contain an integer value ranging from 0 to 99 and can be used to order the sequence of execution of the various ELIM rules, if desired.

Automatic Document Adjustment for Scheduling Agreements

Hi all,
we are usiing automatic document adjustment for purchase orders and it is working fine. If price in the info record is changed the purchase order is updated accordingly as long as no follow on documents are existing.
I am wondering if scheduling agreements can also be updated as long as no follow on documents are existing. I tried to get them updated but did not succeed.
Maybe somebody has wver tried it and knows if in general it is possible.
Thank you for helping.
Regards
Carolin

yes it is possible,
to get the goal you have to set the Scheduling agreement without time-dependent conditions.
how? SAP IMG >Scheduling Agreement>Define Document Types and unflag the time-independent conditions.
enjoy

Price Adjustment is not getting updated using OE_ORDER_PUB.PROCESS_ORDER

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to create a price adjsument at line level for SERVICE lines using OE_ORDER_PUB.PROCESS_ORDER, but it does not update/create. Please let me know the key pointers to accomplish this.
OE_ORDER_PUB.PROCESS_ORDER(p_api_version_number => l_api_version_number
,p_header_rec => l_header_rec
,p_line_tbl => l_line_tbl
,p_action_request_tbl => l_action_request_tbl
,p_line_adj_tbl => l_line_adj_tbl --I am passing price adjustment record type here
-- OUT variables
,x_header_rec => l_header_rec_out
,x_header_val_rec => l_header_val_rec_out
,x_header_adj_tbl => l_header_adj_tbl_out
,x_header_adj_val_tbl => l_header_adj_val_tbl_out
,x_header_price_att_tbl => l_header_price_att_tbl_out
,x_header_adj_att_tbl => l_header_adj_att_tbl_out
,x_header_adj_assoc_tbl => l_header_adj_assoc_tbl_out
,x_header_scredit_tbl => l_header_scredit_tbl_out
,x_header_scredit_val_tbl => l_header_scredit_val_tbl_out
,x_line_tbl => l_line_tbl_out
,x_line_val_tbl => l_line_val_tbl_out
,x_line_adj_tbl => l_line_adj_tbl_out
,x_line_adj_val_tbl => l_line_adj_val_tbl_out
,x_line_price_att_tbl => l_line_price_att_tbl_out
,x_line_adj_att_tbl => l_line_adj_att_tbl_out
,x_line_adj_assoc_tbl => l_line_adj_assoc_tbl_out
,x_line_scredit_tbl => l_line_scredit_tbl_out
,x_line_scredit_val_tbl => l_line_scredit_val_tbl_out
,x_lot_serial_tbl => l_lot_serial_tbl_out
,x_lot_serial_val_tbl => l_lot_serial_val_tbl_out
,x_action_request_tbl => l_action_request_tbl_out
,x_return_status => l_return_status
,x_msg_count => l_msg_count
,x_msg_data => l_msg_data);
COMMIT;
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Sumir

Hi,
The function you are using is not suitable, it is not intended to be used stand-alone without further code to complete the order close process.
The best option would be to use BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN to perform technical completion (Method TECHNICALCOMPLETE). Transaction CO99 could then be used to mass close these orders.
-Paul

How to resolve price difference in case of Returning material through STO

We are receiving material from our plant A to plant B. Material is manufactured in plant A and Standard price (3 S) is maintained for this material. In plant B, 2 V is maintained for this material and no excise credit is taken here. Now when i am returning unsuitable material back to plant A, there is a price difference, due to which plant A is unable to take the credit.
Is there is any process so that same material cost is picked in sto when we are returning material to plant A
Edited by: Sunil Kalia on Sep 15, 2010 9:19 AM
Edited by: Sunil Kalia on Sep 15, 2010 9:20 AM

In manufacturing plant Sales price is maintained as Standard price in Z-table , which is material cost + manufacturing cost. On this cost material is inward to plant B. But when material is returned back, MAP is assigned in STO, which is material Cost. The issue is due to different valuation areas at plant level in the same company.
Is there is some process to link the original STO with Return STO as discount issue does not match the prices.
Regards,
Sunil

Using RB00 condition type for Price Adjustment

Hi,
I have to do a price adjustment due to some rounding issues in the pricing of my sales order.(Using standard Pricing Procedure RVAA01). I am thinking of using manual condition type RB00 at Item level that can accept both positive and negative values depending on the situation.
If the calculated value>expected value then the user will enter negative RB00 value manually and
if the calculated value<expected value then the user will enter positive RB00 value manually.
The account key is however different in standard Pricing procedure for RB00 and it is ERS and for standard Base Price (PR00) it is ERL.
So, my question is that does that make any difference if I maintain condition records in VKOA for RB00 same as PR00?

Hi
If you are looking for rounding then you round the decimals by not maintaining any decimals.But if it is a price adjustment then your approach is correct
If it is VK11 then there is no need to maintain condition record for RB00 as it is a manual condition type at item level
If you are talking to maintain revenue account determination VKOA then you have to maintain as whenever you give discount then it will hit some G/L account .So you should assign a G/L account also
Regards
Srinath

Automatic price adjustment based on quality of material.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for