Automatic ROW Processing error after changing Schema

Hello all,
I have an APEX 3.0 application referencing tables on a different schema from the parsing schema.
Workspace A -> using parsing schema A1
Application A -> installed in Workspace A
Application A -> access tables in schema A2 from schema A1, through synonyms
All is working fine.
Then I had to duplicate the application (let me say: to have a test environment).
So, I created a Workspace B, a parsing schema B1, I've installed application A as application B in workspace B, and I've created schema B2 and I gave the grants to schema B1.
Application B is running fine when trying to access objects on the parsing schema B1, but it returns a lot of errors when accessing objects on schema B2, in particular on Automatic Row Processing and Automated Row Fetch processes. The error I'm getting vary from ORA-942 (table or view doesn't exist) to ORA-936 (missing expression).
A strange thing is that in Automatic Row Processing and Automated Row Fetch processes, I can choose only schema A1 as Table Owner, and all is working fine.
In application B, I can select as Table Owner also the schema B2, even if it's not associated to the workspace. By doing this something works better. But I don't want to modify every page in the application where this happens. Also because I want the opportunity to maintain only one application.
I think that the application installed in workspace B, still tries to access objects in schema A2, but I don't know why.
Do you have any suggestion?
Thanks.
Andrea

It returns these results:
WORKSPACE     APPLICATION_ID     APPLICATION_NAME     PAGE_ID     PROCESS_SOURCE
WS_DEMO     107     myappname     73160     F|&FETCH_SCHEMA.:CDW_LST_GRP:P73160_LTG_ID:LTG_ID
WS_DEMO     107     myappname     73160     &FETCH_SCHEMA.:CDW_LST_GRP:P73160_LTG_ID:LTG_ID|IUD
The query returns the same results in PROCESS_SOURCE columns, when ran from workspace A or B.
I've found that FETCH_SCHEMA is an "application definition", and I've setup correctly in workspace B. The problem persists.
Bye,
Andrea

Similar Messages

  • Automatic Row Processing fetch error (ORA-00936: missing expression)

    Hi there,
    I have a bit of a problem setting up automatic row processing. The Apex processing is causing an error, but I'm not sure what PL/SQL code is being run (obviously, I don't have access to the Apex code) and all I get is the error following:
    0.13: Processing point: AFTER_HEADER
    0.13: ...Process "Notes load": DML_FETCH_ROW (AFTER_HEADER) F|#OWNER#:PUPIL_NOTE:P29_PUPIL_ID:PUPIL_ID:P29_ACHIEVEMENT_SET_ID:ACHIEVEMENT_SET_ID
    0.16: Show ERROR page...
    and then the following exception report on the page:
    ORA-06550: line 1, column 17: PL/SQL: ORA-00936: missing expression ORA-06550: line 1, column 9: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
    Can anyone tell me how I can diagnose the problem?
    Many thanks,
    Robert
    Message was edited to change subject

    I am having a very similiar problem
    0.02: Fetch session state from database
    0.03: Branch point: BEFORE_HEADER
    0.03: Fetch application meta data
    0.03: Computation point: BEFORE_HEADER
    0.03: Processing point: BEFORE_HEADER
    0.04: ...DML_FETCH_ROW (BEFORE_HEADER) F|#OWNER#:JOH:P66_JOH_ID:JOH_ID
    0.49: Show ERROR page...
    0.50: Processing point: AFTER_ERROR_HEADER
    ORA-06550: line 1, column 17: PL/SQL: ORA-00936: missing expression ORA-06550: line 1, column 9: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
    JOH was a synonym (allowing other shemas to access the table) but @I delted those
    P66_JOH_ID is a DB column (which it wasnt)
    but I still get the error
    ORA-06550: line 1, column 17: PL/SQL: ORA-00936: missing expression ORA-06550: line 1, column 9: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
    Any ideas how I can track this down?

  • Processing Static (via automatic row processing) & Dynmaic fields

    Hi,
    I have a page that has 2 sections. Section S is statically driven which I'd like to process via a Automatic Row Process DML. Section D is for dynamic fields which I process via a PL/SQL script.
    I need to process Section D (dynamic) first.
    Now they're 2 things that I'm noticing when I try this. Can someone please confirm.
    - After my process of Section D it seems to make a commit. I know this since I have a error in Section S, and the values from Section D are committed to the DB. I need to make sure a commit only occurs after all page processes have completed error free.
    - My Automatic Row Process DML for Section S doesn't seem to work at all. It can't seem to read the values at all. I know this since I have several columns which are "NOT NULL" and the appropriate error messages are being raised. The Automatic Row Fetch for Section S does work properly.
    For the time being the work around is writing a process for the entire page which includes both Section S and Section D. The thing is I thought that HTMLDB would be able to help me out a lot with Section S since it had static fields etc.

    Martin - I would try to debug these two processes separately. If the Auto DML process isn't firing, perhaps the button used to submit the page isn't setting the request to one of the standard values recognized by the Auto DML package ('INSERT','CREATE','CREATE_AGAIN','CREATEAGAIN' for inserts and 'SAVE','APPLY CHANGES','UPDATE','UPDATE ROW','CHANGE','APPLY' or like 'APPLY%CHANGES%' for update).
    A commit happens whenever session state is changed, so if your process saves an item value, that would do it. If you think that is not the cause of the commit, let me know the details of the process and I'll take a closer look. There is no way to prevent the commit when session state is updated.
    Scott

  • Automatic row processing updating my primary key

    Hi all!
    In Apex 3.2, I've got an Interactive report with a DML form on a table. My table has a primary key which use a sequence (trigger based). When I created my forms, I specified that I wanted to use an existing trigger as the source type of the primary key.
    When I try to create a record, it work. If I try to create a new record and save, my trigger give me an error message because the automatic row processing is trying to update the primary key too. (My trigger on the update specify that the primary key should not be updated).
    So my question is : How can I make the automatic row processing update everything but the primary key ? (I noticed that I could have asked APEX to use my SEQUENCE directly instead of the trigger (in the creation Wizard). But I dont know how to change this now that my form is created.)
    Is there a source type that I can change in my primary key item ?
    Note : My primary key item (id_emp) is protected and hidden. If I display it as "Display only", the update works... But I dont need to see id_emp on my form.

    OK,
    From your first post, it sounds as though the process is trying to perform an INSERT rather than an UPDATE. It is, therefore, trying to create a new record using a primary key that already exists on the table.
    If that is the case, then we need to go through the points along that route:
    1 - when you load a record into the page, the primary key page item should be given a value. So, firstly, check the link is populating the correct page item. And then, when the page has loaded, click the Session button on the Developer's toolbar at the bottom of the screen and check that the value is there
    2 - when the page loads, one, and only one, page item should have the primary key value. This should be P3_NO_EMPLOYE*. Check other page items to make sure that their source is not NO_EMPLOYE. Again, check with using the Session button to see if the value appears anywhere else on the page
    3 - when the page loads, the "SAVE" button should become visible. Check that this is conditional on P3_NO_EMPLOYE being NOT NULL
    4 - there should be one, and only one, button that triggers the SAVE action. Check that there are no other buttons that either (A) are called SAVE or (B) trigger the INSERT SQL database action
    5 - when the SAVE button is clicked, the "Process Row of..." process should be triggered and, because the button is SAVE and, therefore, sends "SAVE" as the REQUEST value, the process identifies this request as an Update database action. Check that you have Update ticked on the process and that you only have one process that can perform the update
    6 - it is possible to change the value of the Request after a button has been clicked, so check that you have no computations or processes that run before the "Process Row of..." process
    Andy

  • Automatic Row Processing BUG?

    Unfortunately it turns out that one can not create report with form through the wizard if the target table has a primary key that should be updatable. Is that true?
    I have a table with only 2 columns 1-code of some type, 2-description. Column 1 is primary key.
    I get the following error when I try to change tha value of column 1:
    ORA-20001: Error in DML: p_rowid=ass, p_alt_rowid=CURRENCYCODE, p_rowid2=, p_alt_rowid2=. ORA-01403: no data found
    I searched through the forum but noone explained why this happens. And the only thing that I think is the reason for this is that Automatic Row Processing does not remember the previous value of the primary key column so its embedded SET statement only has the new value.
    Is this a bug?
    I don't want to create different processes to update, delete, create. This however involves using temp hidden field to hold the original value of my first column.
    Would You fix this to be done automatically in HTMLDB when using the wizard with Automatic Row Processing?
    My version is: 1.6.0.00.87
    Thanks

    Well, actually the wizard succeded but it did not do what I needed: my table is with one column (primary key) and another column (varchar). The wizard asked me for my primary key column and I pointed it, but after it secceeded and I ran the form, the field was hidden. But I wanted it to be avalable for entering/editing so I changed it to a text box type. Does that help?
    And another thing what happens if I use the wizzard on a table with to columns which define a composite primary key. when i point them on the relevant page, the next page of the wizzard asks me to choose columns, but there aren't any more because it appears to hide my primary key fields. In this case i really can not use the usard for helping me with automatic processing. This and the previous case I believe are if not bugs then at least "lacks" of the wizzard.

  • Automatic Row Processing (DML) Update problem

    Hi All,
    I am using Oracle 10.2.0.3 on Windows Server 2003 with "Application Express 3.1.0.00.32".
    I have two schemas in the database, A and B
    B has all the tables which holds the production data
    A has all the synonymns for all of B's objects and plus insert, delete, update, execute rights on B's objects.
    I have a view MyView which basically reads from a table from B's schema
    and an APEX form based on this view... so far so good.
    Problem is when I generate a form using form wizard and try to update a record in the table in B's schema, I get the following error: I cannot use B as the OWNER in APEX, because for other reasons, I need to use A.
    Automatic Row Processing (DML)
    ORA-20505: Error in DML: p_rowid=CA-4837-AHU-002, p_alt_rowid=OBJ_CODE, p_rowid2=, p_alt_rowid2=. ORA-20503: Current version of data in database has changed since user initiated update process. current checksum = "97813992F558009979B5B86C925AD4AC" application checksum = "FA8AB5EC759780B0048E2C11584CD5E6"
    Does anybody know why I get this error message? Is it possible to update the table using the view? I know for sure that my browser is not caching the data and someone else is not editing the same record.
    Thanks in advance,
    Sinan

    Hi,
    Problem is when I generate a form using form wizard and try to update a record in the table in B's schema, I get the following error: *I cannot use B as the OWNER in APEX*, because for other reasons, I need to use A.As highlighted, you need to grant insert, delete, update, execute rights on B schema's objects to APEX schema. Also, you may need to use "Instead of" trigger for view.
    Regards,
    Mangal

  • Are 'read only' items causing my automatic row processing to fail?

    I have a form that uses automatic row processing to update my table.
    I recently had to add a check to lock down the fields using the read only condition where a record has been 'approved'. So, I turned off all of the fields and hid the update button.
    Now they want me to check to see if the user is a manager, and if so, allow them to see the update button, and make a single field on the form modifiable.
    I have the user identified as a manager, and can make the field accept the change (a yes/no combo box). Yet when they click the update button, the form just sits there. A branch is supposed to fire on hitting that button, taking them back to the previous report, but it doesn't happen. The source of the combo box in question uses a column on the table, and works fine when the form has all of the fields showing for modification.
    I had some validations that I finally set to never fire, thinking that they were failing and just not giving the error messages. I know a bad sql or pl/sql atatement in a validation will cause the form to just keep sitting there doing nothing, and thought it might help.
    Several of the various fields are combo boxes, several are text boxes.
    I'm stumped.
    Shall I keep the regular update button hidden whether it is a manager or not (because it has been 'approved'), and enable a new button that fires off a process to update the one field that the manager may want to change? Does making a field 'read only' always have a detrimental effect on the auto processes I've been counting on? Is that if fact what is happening now?
    Thanks in advance for any advice or comments on this.
    Clayton

    Hi, Scott.
    My version is 3.0.0.00.20
    I have received info to set up the application, though I have not activated it as yet. I'm reluctant to try to load up the various tables to make it work. It could be done.
    My workaround is to that the user (a manager) fires off to another form to show an individual record, and ask if he/she really wants to make this change. On submit, they will be taken back to the original locked down form, and I will update the single field in that process of returning them. This will actually be a plus, in that I expect to show them all of the 'duplicate' entries for that item, and show them that by 'activating' this particular item, they will 'deactivate' the one duplicate that is currently active. Or, if they are deactivating the sole item that is active, that there will in fact be no active items in the system. Convoluted as heck, but they swear this is how they've been doing business with their briefcases and file cabinets of Excel files. I'm surprise they even float at this point (these are ships we're talking about).
    This all may be due to the form originally having a next/previous/count process once arrived at my clicking on the edit button of the report of items. All of that has been hidden away, and though the fields exist of the form, they are not used. They only see the current item that they clicked on from the report.
    I read up a little on session state, as well as posts with the debug error I was getting. I'm still not on board with the whole issue of 'state'. Items stay as they are until they're changed, no? I suppose that sounds simplistic.
    One of the things that caught my eye was several combo box lists that on read only mode, showed [] square brackets. Which, in some cases is okay.
    What I'll try to do is set up a public application - for future use if nothing else. I'm going to be working on this for awhile. I have more than a bit of work to do to cleanse the data as well as get rid of the single sign on requirement (I'll assume that I should have to do this) in order to share the app.
    I know you're expecting me to have this up and running for you to look at, but I'm under the gun. And they actually like my workaround.
    I'll keep everybody informed, one way or another.
    Clayton

  • Without Automatic Row Processing (DML)

    Hi All
    I try to make one page to show use DML statements without standard Automatic Row Process.
    What I have:
    One page with:
    region: Report - select empno, ename, sal, deptno from emp;
    region: Form with items: p6_empn, p6_ename, p6_sal, p6_deptno
    addictionaly in that moment I have:
    process CreateProcess:
    begin
    insert into emp (empno, ename, sal, deptno)
    values (emp_seq.nextval, :P6_ENAME, :P6_SAL, :P6_DEPTNO);
    commit;
    end;
    and button CREATE.
    Create Process is fired when I push CREATE button and Insert statement works corecctly. Branch is on the same page. (I use request).
    Now I would like to show update and delete statements.
    In Report I have in column EMPNO standard button Edit (each row)
    (<img src="#IMAGE_PREFIX#edit.gif" alt="Edit">)
    I have process SelectProcess:
    begin
    select ename,sal,deptno
    into :p6_ename, :p6_sal, :p6_deptno
    from emp
    where empno = :p6_empno;
    end;
    It is fired In Load _ Before Header
    When I push Edit in one row I would like to see details of employee in Form, but I see nothing. In session state all is correct - I see :p6.... with name, sal and ...
    I dont know how to connect this process with buton and branch.
    could you help me?

    Hi,
    I have done a quick test for this - [http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=25946:1]
    On the Edit page, I have a process called P2_LOAD_DATA that runs "On Load - Before Header", is conditional on P2_EMPNO being NOT NULL and using the following code:
    BEGIN
    SELECT EMPNO, ENAME, JOB
    INTO :P2_EMPNO, :P2_ENAME, :P2_JOB
    FROM EMP
    WHERE EMPNO = :P2_EMPNO;
    END;I have a button with a Button Name setting of "UPDATE" (user sees this as Apply Changes)
    I then have a process that runs "On Submit - After Computations and Validations" and is conditional on REQUEST = UPDATE. The code is:
    BEGIN
    UPDATE EMP
    SET ENAME = :P2_ENAME,
    JOB = :P2_JOB
    WHERE EMPNO = :P2_EMPNO;
    END;The source settings on P2_EMPNO, P2_ENAME and P2_JOB are as I described in my previous post.
    One thing to check - do you have a "reset page" process? If so, remove it.
    Andy

  • Solved: Delete Using Automatic Row Processing

    See Scott's reply below for the answer.
    Hi there,
    I have an application built in APEX 3.0.1 that I would like to be able to use a button to delete a single row from an underlying database table (owned by the parsing schema).
    My APEX page has a 3 HTML regions on it:
    1. Only a Select List and Go button for User selection (of Debit Note)
    2. Ten display Items (Text Field, Disabled saves state) displaying further information about User selection
    3. Conditional Delete button (region with custom image) - only displays when P73_DEBITNOTEID is NOT NULL
    I'd like this button to be used to Delete the Selected Item and thought I'd be able to use a Data Manipulation Page Process - Automatic Row Processing (DML) page process to do this.
    However, when I go through the wizard the Select item containing primary key column value field has no values in the search list.
    My first question is why was there no values in the list?
    So I manually entered the Item I required (P73_DEBITNOTEID) but when I run the page and click the button I get a PL/SQL missing expression error.
    What is the best practice method to do DML actions on the underlying database tables. The tables are all owned by the parsing schema.
    Your help in resolving this matter would be greatly appreciated.
    Kind Regards,
    Gary.

    Gary,
    The DML processes (and the creation wizards for them) are for use with items having source type Database Column. If your page items don't use this source type, then neither the Automated Row Fetch nor the Automatic Row Processesing (DML) process types will work.
    Scott

  • Understanding "automatic row processing"

    hi,
    i have problems understanding automatic row processing in apex.
    at first i thought there is a relation between page process (fetch row, insert, update,...) and page items / reports.
    something like: Item P1_TESTTEXTBOX (Source=Database Column => "TESTCOLUMN") referes to process "FETCH ROW FROM TESTTABLE"
    but i havent found any relation.
    then i thought there is a "global pool of database columns" (fetched, inserted, updated by a page processes)... when a fetch process loads data from a db-table, all columns from this table are stored in a "dictionary"...but this also didnt seems to be right.
    i did some testing to understand the (row fetch) behavior but there a still some questions:
    - i created 2 Processes (Data Manipulation -> Row Fetch) in "After Header" on 2 different Database tables but each with a Column "TESTCOLUMN" (for testing^^) . It didn't work properly: it seems that only one fetch process is executed .
    I'm still not quite sure how automatic row processing (fetch, insert, update) is working...
    are there any explanation about this issue? i havent found any information that goes into detail.

    ok, some testing later i come to the conclusion that the automatic row processing works like this:
    when a row (fetch) process starts, ALL binded Page Items (Source Type=Database Column) tries to load their data from the current fetch-process.
    i tried to add 2 different Regions containing some Page Items (TextBox) that binds to a Database Column.
    * Region1 should contain Artikle-Information (refers to DB-Table Article)
    * Region2 should contain Article-Detail Informations (refers to DB-Table ArticleDetails)
    i am not able to create 2 Row fetch processes in 1 page, because i got an error when the first row-fetch process starts "Column [XY] not found in table [YZ]"
    obviously there is no way to "link" processes to regions, reports or page items.
    or is it possible to create 2 regions (in 1 page) with automated row processing, that refers to different tables ? (region1/report1 => DBTable1, region2/report2 => DBTable2)?
    (the only way i see is that i create a view that contains these 2 DBTables, so i only need one row fetch process for this page)
    thanks in advance
    rene...

  • Automatic row processing insert fail

    Hi all,
    Application Express 3.2.1.00.11
    Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
    I am running into a problem where my automatic row processing will update and delete records but will not insert. I get the following error.
    ORA-44003: invalid SQL nameI disabled all triggers and added the appropriate fields to my form and manually entered correct data and am still having the issue. I can run a trace but only the dba has access to retrieve the file and he is gone. Any suggestions on where to start? i checked debug mode and it is definitely hanging on the ARP.
    Cheers,
    Tyson Jouglet

    All,
    Finally fixed it!!! So if you experience this problem, double check all of your item sources. I was upgrading a date column to a timezone column and subsecuently made it three different items. Long story less long, I left the original date item on the form and deleted the source column name but i forgot to change the item source from database column to something else. This will not effect how apex deletes or updates a record but it will not allow you to insert a new record. I know this is a user error, but maybe this could be added as a validation?
    Cheers,
    Tyson Jouglet

  • Automatic row processing in a validation

    Hi,
    I have a form on a table (page11) with one process for automatic row processing and I have the buttons Submit and Create.
    I have another button f.e. BUTTON_NEW. I have a validation (function returning error text) with "BUTTON_NEW" as When-Button-pressed-Condition. In the validation I did an Insert into another table.
    I changed values of items on Page11 and don't press Submit. And then I press "BUTTON_NEW". The validation on BUTTON_NEW works fine. But the changed values are lost. Is there a possibility for an automatic "Submit" or "Create" when BUTTON_NEW is pressed?
    Thanks, Daniela

    Hi,
    these are the values I currently see:
    108 14 P14_SELECTEDSS Display as Text (escape special characters, does not save state) No
    108 14 P14_CHARACTERISTIC_ID Hidden and Protected Reset to Null No
    108 14 P14_SHAREDSERVICE_ID Text Field 30 Inserted No
    108 14 P14_CAPTION Text Field No
    108 14 P14_CATEGORY_ID Select List No
    108 14 P14_WEIGHING Text Field No
    108 14 P14_DESCRIPTION Textarea No
    I also have to say that I deleted the computations I created earlier again cause they did not work and I had the same values for these variables. I am trying to (pre)set P14_SHAREDSEVICE_ID to P13_SELSS when I click the create button on page 13.
    Thanks again,
    Henrik

  • Strange behaviour  Automatic Row Processing (DML) process

    Hi all,
    I'm executing a process with a fetch Automatic Row Processing (DML) over a synonym and it works perfectly but when i change the table owner it doesn't work anymore and give the error:
    ORA-06550: line 1, column 17: PL/SQL: ORA-00936: missing expression ORA-06550: line 1, column 9: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
    Unable to fetch row.
    I thought it could be from the permissions of that owner over that synonym so i give it all grants, but still no luck.
    Does anyone knows if there are some limitations for the Automatic Row Processing (DML) process?

    Once again thanks for the reply Munky,
    The original table created on schema1 (ADMGIN) :
    SQL> desc MAN_ALT_TAB
    Name Null? Type
    ALT_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
    ALT_DES VARCHAR2(50)
    AAT_COD NOT NULL VARCHAR2(10)
    ALT_ID_REL NUMBER
    ALT_MUL_REG VARCHAR2(1)
    ALT_FOR_DES VARCHAR2(4000)
    The synonym created in schema2 (PORTAL) :
    CREATE OR REPLACE SYNONYM "PORTAL"."MAN_ALT_TAB" FOR "ADMGIN"."MAN_ALT_TAB";
    Grants on the schema1 (ADMGIN) owner:
    GRANT ALL ON MAN_ALT_TAB TO PORTAL;
    There isn't a new table in the schema2 only a synonym.
    The synonym isn't created in schema1 it was created in schema2.
    Regards Pedro.

  • Automatic Row Processing (DML) using synonym name instead of table

    I want my APEX form to select info using the table name but perform all the DML (add, change, delete) using the synonym name. I created the form using the wizard and went into the "Process Row of xxx" process that was created. I tried changing the table name to synonym name under the 'Source: Automatic Row Processing (DML)' section, but it still uses the table name. Is this possible or do I need to manually create processes using the synonym names

    Hi,
    when I change the Table Name property in the "Automatic Row Processing (DML)" process to a non existing table it raises an error when I run the page and try to save something. So it's actually using the value.
    Does the synonym point to the same table or a different table? What is the intention behind selecting from the table but updating through the synonym?
    Patrick
    My APEX Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com/
    The APEX Builder Plugin: http://builderplugin.oracleapex.info/
    The ApexLib Framework: http://apexlib.sourceforge.net/

  • Bug Report: Automatic Row Fetch/Automatic Row Processing and invalid column

    Hi,
    if an invalid column name is specified for a page item of type "Database Column", no error is reported by the Automatic Row Fetch/Automatic Row Processing process. It's just ignored and nothing is returned!!! That makes it kind of hard to identify such an error.
    The problem can happen for example when a column is renamed or if there is a typo in the column name during creation.
    The problem seems to be related to the following query which doesn't use an outer join.
    SELECT C.COLUMN_NAME, C.DATA_TYPE, I.NAME, I.FORMAT_MASK, I.DISPLAY_AS
    FROM
    SYS.ALL_TAB_COLUMNS C, WWV_FLOW_STEP_ITEMS I WHERE C.OWNER = :B4 AND
      C.TABLE_NAME = :B3 AND I.SOURCE = C.COLUMN_NAME AND I.SOURCE_TYPE =
      'DB_COLUMN' AND I.FLOW_ID = :B2 AND I.FLOW_STEP_ID = :B1 AND (C.DATA_TYPE
      IN ('DATE','NUMBER','CLOB','LONG','FLOAT') OR C.DATA_TYPE LIKE 'NUMBER%' OR
      C.DATA_TYPE = 'CHAR' OR C.DATA_TYPE LIKE '%VARCHAR%' OR C.DATA_TYPE LIKE
      'TIMESTAMP%') ORDER BY C.COLUMN_IDBTW, if an invalid table/view name is specified for a Automatic Row Fetch/Automatic Row Processing process, the error message during runtime isn't very speaking.
    ORA-06550: line 1, column 17: PL/SQL: ORA-00936: missing expression ORA-06550: line 1, column 9: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignoredMaybe that could be changed too.
    Thanks
    Patrick
    My APEX Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
    The APEX Builder Plugin: http://builderplugin.oracleapex.info/
    The ApexLib Framework: http://apexlib.sourceforge.net/

    It says filed (with an L) not fixed (with an X). That means they have noted down the bug, but it may or may not have been fixed yet.

Maybe you are looking for