Automatic Transfer requirement not created

Hi Fiends,
We have created a returns Sales order and against that we are doing return goods receipts. Whne we did POst goods receipts system post the material docuemnt but it was not creating any transfre requirements.
How we do the automatic tr while creating material docuemnts, and where can we maintain the settings.
Regards
Palani

Thanks for your immediate respones.
I am talking about the TR creation not TO. When we posted the Delivery Material docuemnt was create and in that materail docuemnt i cannot See the TR number.
As you said We verified the LB10 etc and did not find any TR docuemnts . We have maintain the setting for wharehouse, IM mvt , WH movement type and TR creation indicator X etc but system is not creating TR along with the Material docuemnt

Similar Messages

Transfer Requirement not getting created

Hi All,
My query as below;
Production order is created using KANBAN (Control Cycle/Supply Area is defined) using classic KANBAN.
WM is in place and all the setting related to TR/TO creation for WM movement type 103 is in place.
When i am trying to receive this Production after completion it is not creating the TR/TO, while as material document is getting generated and shows the stock directly in interim storage type 901 without creating TR and TO.
Further i checked there is indicator in Production order i.e "Kanban indicator" that gets checked automatically when Production order is created using KANBAN Processs and if i remove that indicator forcefully, TR and TO is getting created normally.
Please provide some inputs where can be the problem and how TR and TO can be created normally eventhough KANBAN indicator is checked in Production order and where i can found the setting related to "KANBAN INDICATOR".
Appreciate your help.

Hi Maddy
Thanks very much for your response.
1. When you use KANBAN, you define separate KANBAN storage location, which is different from WM-managed replenishment storage locations, and separate KANBAN interim storage area with storage bin.
Yes different storage location is defined which is not WM-managed in supply area.
As you said Control Cycle is defined, see if the interface is properly defined for both of these Sloc.
Where i can check whether interface is properly defined or not.
2. See if you have defined the KANBAN replenishment strategy with Control type Transfer Requirements from a Storage Location which is being controlled by WM in the Customizing for Production under KANBAN > Replenishment Strategies > Define Stock Transfer Strategies
Actually for a material two strategies are defined like;
1) In-house Production strategies-0003-
supply area is defined with storage location which is IM managed.
And when this order is completed and i am trying to receive this in WM SLOC (usally whatever SLOC we have defined in supply area it proposes that SLOC at the time of receipt but i am changing this manually to WM managed SLOC) using transaction MIGO, it is directly taking the stock to 901 interim storage type and in total the stock increases but the problem is when TR is not getting created i am not able to take this to the storage bin as per strategies defined.
2) Stock Transfer Strategies-This is working fine and in that TR/TO is working fine.
3. For TO to get created automatically by the system from the transfer requirement, see if an indicator Automatic TO creation in the replenishment strategy is set or not. Yes this is set for stock transfer strategies but i didn't find option to check the TO creation automatically for in-house production strategy
4. Also, check that you have set up a suitable replenishment movement type for KANBAN in the Customizing for Warehouse Management under Activities > Transfers > Define Movement Types (i.e.standard is 350 for KANBAN replenishment)-Yes this is also defined correctly.
Appreciate your more inputs on this.

Transfer Order not created while performing GR for Production order

Hi, I am facing a problem while recieving stock from a production order. The system does not create a transfer requirement or a TO.
Let me give you a brief background.
This is a new functionality introduced in ECC 6.0 for working with kanban in WM.
Supply area is created for WM location.
Control cycle is created for material, supply area. Warehouse, storage type and Bin is maintained in control cycle record. When the GR is done for production order material is recieved in this bin.
1) Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
2) Once the production order is confirmed the material automatically shows up in the bin.
A material document is created which shows IM movement type 101 and WM movement type 103. Also in material document Immediate auto TO checkmark is blank.
3) *PROBLEM* - System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin. How can we enable an auto TR and TO creation.
Following are the settings which I have already checked:
1) In IMG, WM movement type 103 has auto TO indicator set.
2) IM-WM interface for 102 movement type and 103 movement type is maintained.
The main problem is: Although the material document displays WM movement type 103 and the stock lies in WM bin, System never created a Transfer requirement or a Transfer order.
I would really appreciate if anyone can help me in this.
Thanks

Hi Mike,
I do not know this function in SAP, so these are just my ideas:
1.
System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin.
I think it's a normal SAP behaviour. If you do GR against a PO the quant(s) will appear in interim storage bin w/o TO. The TO is to move the quants from one bin to another, but in this case the quant comes from 'nothing' and arrives at the bin.
If you make confirmation and consume the components refering to a PrdOrd, the components will disappear w/o TO from storage type 100 + dynamic bin, because there's no TO that could move them from dynamic bin to 'nothing'.
So, these 'movements' are to change the WM stock level and TOs are not designed for this.
2.
There's difference between auto creation of TO and immediate TO creation. Please check what SAP help says in case of TOs for outbound deliveries:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f8406c4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
3.
Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
So, if you remove the stock from the Kanban it triggers the creation of a PrdOrd. This is very logical in a Kanban system because it is a pull system. but your problem is not this, it's clear.
If you just created an automatic TO and would remove the stock from Kanban-bin, a new PrdOrd would be generated, and so on. As many times you remove the stock a new PrdOrd is created and this might be the reason why no TO is crated automatically. In this case this would be a push system and not kanban system.
I do not know this process but if we concentrate only on the pull system, maybe this Kanaban is to store the FG until an event (e.g. shipment) should trigger the stock removal from this bin. (just my assumption)
Please try to mark the TR creation for the movement type w/o auto / immediate TO and tell us the result (whether you get the TR if you confirm the PrdOrd).
Regards,
Csaba

Dependents requirement not created

Hello Gurus,
I am running MRP through batch MRP run
(t.code - wc27),
Processing key NEUPL 3 3 1 1 1. I want to create dependents requirement future dated so date input I gave is 28/12/2018 last working day form factory calender., but requirement is not created.
Please help I am new in this module. Need help.

Hello Ameya
I don't see the point of running MRP with date 28/12/2018.
Dependent requirements will be created on future date according to the parent planned order date, not to the MRP date.
Please try to run MRP again it with today date.
If you want to have dependent requirements in the future, please make sure that there are planned orders with date in the future for the parent materials.
BR
Caetano

Automatic schedule lines not creating after MD03

HI Gurus,
When I am running MD03 system is creating Pur. Requisitions instead of Schedule lines
I am running with
NETCH
2
3
1
1
1
29102011
Data maintained
1.Material master /vendor master Auto po ticked (MRP type VB ROP 500 ,Safety stock 600, current stock 200)
2.Sch. Agreement created with LP (validity period, Qty ok)
3.Pur. Info rec maintained for vendor material for the plant.
4.Source list maintained with Vendor,scheduling agreement no ,item no, MRP indicator 2 Fixed vendor ticked
Now after Running MD03
Pur. Req created for 400 qty
but when I click on Procurement proposal manually I can select Del. Schedule and create
but system is asking Agreement no. item,qty etc (I already maintained Source list system is asking again )
Then why not system creating automatically..
Please help..
Thanks in advance

Thanks Jürgen,
It was a problem of Date ,validity period of the SA.
which I sort out any way thank you. for your input

Cross Company Sales Automatic Vendor Invoice Not Created

Hi,
I have an issue in Cross company Sales Scenario (Inter company Sales),
During the Intercompany Invoice we can trigger output RD04 to create Automatic Vendor Invoice in the Ordering Company.
I have done the necessary configuration for creating Idoc (RD04), FI & MM.
I could able to create an Idoc successfully and the status of the Idoc is 53.
However when I check the Vendor Invoice in the Ordering Company T.Code FBL1N, system gives me message that no items found for the Vendor.
I request please let me know me what configuration I have to do to create Cross Company Sales Automatic Vendor Invoice
Regards,
Murali
Edited by: Murali Mikkili on Jul 27, 2008 9:05 AM
Edited by: Murali Mikkili on Jul 28, 2008 11:49 AM

Hi Daniel,
Both the company codes should be assigned to the same company.
Clearing accounts must be defined in every company code before a cross-company code transaction may be carried out. The clearing accounts may be G/L accounts, customer, or vendor accounts.
In the configuration you must assign clearing accounts to every possible combination of two company codes to allow cross-company code postings between these combinations
To reduce the number of clearing accounts, you can use just one company code as the clearing company code. In this case, you only have to assign clearing accounts to every combination of the clearing company code
In T-code OBYA
For ex: company code 1000 clearing account 12345 is same for Debit and credit
Company code 2000 Clearing account 67890 is same for debit and credit
Posting keys must be assigned to the clearing accounts to identify their account
types.
Hope this helps you to solve your probelm.
Regards,
Mir

SQL Server 2014 Express LocalDB automatic instance is not created

I have just installed SQL Server 2014 Developer Edition and noticed that there is no v12.0 automatic instance. Instead, there is MSSQLLocalDB automatic instance. Is this a bug?

Hi Alex,
According to your description, we need to verify if you install SQL Server 2014 Developer edition and SQL Server 2014 express edition. LocalDB is only just a lightweight version of Express version that has all its programmability features. If you install
SQL Server 2014 express LocalDB, please ensure you install automatic instances of LocalDB and not named instance of LocalDB. Usually,
when the target machine has the specified version of LocalDB installed, the automatic instance of
LocalDB for that version is available on the target machine as well. The name for the automatic instance is a single v character followed by the
LocalDB release version number in the format
xx.x. For example, v12.0 represents SQL Server 2014. For more information, see:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh510202(v=sql.120).aspx
If the issue still exists after checking the above suggestions, you can submit a feedback to Microsoft such issues, I would recommend to submit it to the Microsoft Connect at this link
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/Feedback. This connect site will serve as a connecting point between you and Microsoft, and ultimately the large community for you and Microsoft to
interact with. Your feedback enables Microsoft to offer the best software and deliver superior services, meanwhile you can learn more about and contribute to the exciting projects on Microsoft Connect.
Thanks,
Sofiya Li
If you have any feedback on our support, please click here.
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

TR not created for LP22

hello,
I am executing transaction LP22 for fixed bin replenishment based on requirements in outbound deliveries.when I execute the transaction, I am getting the message "00000001 delivery items with 00000001 materials taken into consideration,00000000 transfer requirements with 00000000 items were created" i.e NO Transfer requirements gets created.
I have created new mvt type 920 by copying from 319 & assigned to my replenishment storage type.In the material master,i have maintained the fixed bin for the replenishment storage type & the replenishment qty.
can anyone tell me why Tr is not getting created in my case?
Thanks
Regards
Goutham.

I have maintained those values but logic behind LP22 is it doesnot check those values as it takes only replenishment qty into. consideration.
does anyone knows whether latest release ECC 6.0, has been fixed to run for LP22 even if 2 step pick is activated?

Incorrect UoM Conversion on Transfer Requirement from Production Order

I have a Question on a Production Order that created a Transfer Requirement. Looking at the Components of the BOM within the Production Order, I have a Material where the Issue Unit of Measure is QT and the Base Unit of Measure is EA, with a Quantity of 1. In the Material Master Alternate Unit of Mesaures, the Conversion is setup so that 1 QT = 1 EA. The question of why the 1 for 1 conversion is not relevant, as this is just how the material was setup and I know it does not make any sense. When the Transfer Requirement is created it is showing that 1 Qt = .25 EA. I am unable to locate where this conversion is coming from. We do not want to lose visibility of this part number, as creating a new part number with a Base Unit of Measure of QT would fix the problem.
Is there anywhere in configuration where there could possibily be a Conversion? I have looked at Control Cycles and the Reference Operation Set and do not see anything.

Closing Thread as there has been no responses but I am still looking for a solution. The only possibility that exists at this time is the material was copied from another material and the UoM Conversion was 1 QT = 4 EA on the Copy From Material. I can not see where any changes were made to the unit measure conversion for the new material. The only other possibility is the Production Order was manually converted to the new material incorrectly.

Transfer Requirements in WM

hi gurus,
i am developing one web interface for material stock transfer.
i have following problems about transfer requirements.
when transfer requirement is created. what is the transaction code for it.
is it created automatically or we have to create manually?
if it is created automatically then after which process it is created.
is there any function module to create transfer requirements.
please solve these problems.
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
thanks in advance.
bhaskar.
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Jan 11, 2008 5:12 PM

Hi Bhaskar,
The below detail might help u out.
In the Warehouse Management (WM) Benchmark, a transfer requirement (transaction LB01) is created to put three materials into stock. This transfer requirement is used to create a transfer order (LT04). Because the number of items per material in the transfer requirement exceeds the number that can be placed into one storage location, the transfer order has seven line items. The process continues to confirm this transfer order for seven items (LT12). For goods removal, these transactions are called again in the same sequence.
Dialog Steps
0. Home page online store
1. Main screen
2. Call Create transfer requirement
3. Enter header data
4. Post transfer requirement
5. Call Create transfer order
6. Create transfer order with reference to transfer requirement
7. Switch to online
8. Place item into stock
9. Place item into stock
10. Place item into stock
11. Post the data
12. Call Confirm transfer order
13. Background processing
14. Call Create transfer requirement
15. Enter data
16. Enter items
17. Call Create transfer order
18. Background processing
19. Call Confirm transfer order
20. Background processing
21. Call /nend
22. Confirm log off
One loop corresponds to 14 stock movements.
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Thankyou,
Regards.
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Jan 11, 2008 5:18 PM

TO not created from TR

Hi,
I have the config set for creating auto TO from TR (in interface i have the setting for auto TO for movement type 311 and 201). But still the TO is not getting created for the TR. Kindly suggest me solution/reasons.
Regards,
samuel

Hi Swagat,
For the posting change what you said is exactly happening in my case. In my case it find both the destination storage type and interim storage type, so i want to write a code to ignore the interim storage type, but i am unable to find a exit as we run std MB!B transaction and after posting the document i am looking for an exit where i can write the code for creating TO.
For TR, in my case storage type search is all defined well and i can manually create TO from TR with no problem, only that automatically system does not create TO for movement type 201.
Your advice will be of great help, thank you again.
Regards,
Samuel

Transfer order not getting created automatically for a backflushed FERT

Hi,
I am having a strange problem. in my business process the WM system is set in such a way that the when a production order is confirmed automatic goods receipt for the FERT is done. which will automatically create a transfer requirement and convert the TR in to TO automatically and TO will be confirmed automatically.
the issue its not happening so.
when I confirm a production order its creating a TR instead of creating TR --> TO --> TO confirmation.
I tried doing manual goods receipt for the production ordeer and the process worked perfectly.
this process is not working for only one plant. and in another plant when i confirm a production order its creating a TR automatically and then tr is getting converted in to TO automatically and TO is getting confirmed automatically.
I checked all configuration and its all same for both plants.

Maintain a storage location in your delivery.

Transfer Order auto create for Posting Change not working

Hello Gurus -
When we release an inspection lot from "Q" status, it creates a posting change notice, and we have it configured to create a TO in the background to the same bin, and auto confirm. The desired and intended result is to take something from "Q" status to unrestricted status, while keeping it in the same bin - and avoiding the user having to deal with the transfer orders. Essentially it is seamless and all in the background, the user just sees that he has changed something from quality status to unrestricted.
It works fine when the entire quantity is selected for the usage decision, but when a partial usage decision is made, the transfer order does not create - and requires processing in LU04 for the posting change.
Why would this work for an entire qty, but not work for a partial qty - and simply require someone to go in to LU04 and hit "create transfer order" - with no additional information?
Any help would be most appreciated. Does it have something to do with a setting of quants?

Hi,
In case of a usage decision for a partial quantity, it is not possible to create the Transfer Order for the generated posting change notice automatically. This is only possible when the full quantity is released. The same happens if you release a partial quantity and post the rest to blocked stock or scrap. The reason is, there needs to be a user decision, which part of the quantity has to be posted, this is necessary for example when the quantity is distributed in the warehouse over many storage bins. But even if the full quantity is on one storage bin, there is no automatic TO creation. You can see this also in the online
processing (LT05), in case of partial quantities you have to enter the selected quantity in the quant list, for a full posting this is not necessary.
Hope this helps,
Sinéad Curran

Create a WM Transfer Requirement against Reservation

Hello,
I have the following request.
Currently we use PM module and create a PM Order and then users put the components, once that is done, a reservation is created.
I have the request to implement WM with this process.
That they need to continue using is the reservation and against this,m create the transfer requirement.
The question is, what steps I need to follow, I required to use mov type 261, but I cannot see the requirement type for "Reservations", I only see:
B     Purchase Order
D     Storage bin
F     Order
K     Cost center
L     Sales document
Should be created one for reservations like:
R    Reservation
what else shpould be updated? any user exit to include that?
Thanks so much for the help.

We have that exact scenario, and implemented WM last month. This is the process:
- WO created in PM with Components. WO saved and Reservation created automatically.
- In MM, Tcode MB1A to issue material out with MOv Type 201. This automatically creates a TR AND a TO. You can switch that off if you want, that was our requirement.
- TO is confirmed when goods are actually taken out of warehouse.
We have no developments or user exits, it's all standard and it's working perfectly.
Check OMLR and make sure to assign your movement type , and put an X on the "Create Transfer Requirement" column (we use 201, not 261). see snapshot:

User Exit / BADI for Transfer Requirement Create

Hi All,
I have looked into the system and i could not find any User Exit or BADI for creation of Transfer requirement. This is for manual creation through LB01 and not interface with PP or IM. I am aware of the Userexits available for those, but i could not find any for WM TR Manual creation.
Let me know if you are aware of any.
Thanks
Jithin

When you create a transfer requirement, i want to make it mandatory to enter the destination bin, for example. The Transfer Requirement should not be saved if it is not entered.
I know we can do this by creating multiple movement types for each destination, but i want to know if there is a way where the user can enter the destination when creating a TR with a single movement type.
Jithin

Automatic Transfer requirement not created

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for