Automatically confirming phase

Hi PPPI Guys,
For some reason I want to add 1 Resourse at last operation in Master recipe.
Eg:-
0010
0020
0030 Resourse1
0040  phase1
0050  Resourse1
0060 phase2
By confirmation of phase1 0040 then remaining last phase automatically confirm using COR6N.
Please gives me required setting ..

No, the way it works in SAP is you normally confirm in the sequence of increasing operation numbers. 0010 then 0020 then 0030 but you can reduce the effort you can either confirm all the operation at once by setting a milestone control key in the last operation (technically you can use milestone in any operation, not just last one) and when you confirm the last one all the operations prior to it like 0010 and 0020 will be confirmed (or) you can confirm at order header level. But... it is not possible to confirm some random operation in the middle and expect to automatically confirm the last operation.

Similar Messages

  • Automatic confirmation in process order

    Hello everybody.
    I need made automatic confirmation to some phases in process order, I hade read that this is possible using process messages.
    Process management supports the direct confirmation from the PI sheet and process control system to the process order by sending process messages to predefined message destinations.
    Someone know what are the steps I need to follow to customize process message?
    What are the transactions that I need to use?
    In some documentation say that for access process management, I need proceed as follows:
    From the main R/3 menu, select the menu options Logistics u2192 Production - process u2192 Process management.
    The system branches to the initial process management menu. From here, you can access all the application functions of process management.
    But when I access that path there is not any transaction for use process management.
    Something is missing for install or what is the transaction that I need use?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    You can do that in T Code CORW.
    For the required production scheduler select the batch creation for process order.
    Also in the Assignment tab of the process order, there is a field for batch, next to it there is a Create button. Click that, you will get the batch number in that field.
    Hope that helps.
    Regards,
    Rohit.
    Added: I apologise, its not the Assignment tab in process order. It is Goods Receipt tab.
    Edited by: Rohit Chauhan on Aug 3, 2009 9:42 AM

  • How to avoid automatic confirmation of BP in Interaction Center

    Hi Experts,
    in SAP CRM when finding the correct BP the system automatically is confirming him. But I don't want the automatic confirmation. Where can I find the customizing so the user always has to use the button 'Confirm'.
    Best Regards
    Oliver

    Hi Oliver,
    You can change the configuration at your identification profile, at t-code CRMC_IC_BPPROFX
    There, change the 'auto continue' options for your profile.
    Kind regards,
    Garcia

  • Automatically confirmation in process order

    Hello everybody.
    Is there a way of confirm (TR. COR6N) a operation in a process order automatically?
    I mean, in my process orders I want that some operation (not all) been confirm with the standard duration. 
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    For operations you want to confirm automatically, maintain a control key which is not milestone confirmation & which has confirmation as optional. Maintain a milestone confirmation enabled control key at the end, so once you confirm this operation all previous operations are automatically confirmed.
    Eg: Operations - 0010, 0020, 0030, 0040.
    For operation 0010 & 0020 if you maintain as confirmation as optional & for operation 0030 as milestone confirmation. Now when you confirm 0030, operations 0010 & 0020 are confirmed automatically.
    To check control key details you can go to OPJ8.
    Test the above in your sandbox & adopt if it meets your need.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Automatic confirmation of activities from MM and PP

    We have had a request in our post go live for automatically confirming activities such Purchase Order confirmation and Release of a Production Order to automatically update the status in SAP PS to the direct activity it is linked through the WBS.
    Have you experienced this request before?  There are some suggestions to trigger off BADIs certain updates to PS but we can’t be the first company to want direct integration between PS/PP?
    Would love to hear your thoughts

    Hi,
    There are standard BAPIs available to which you may required to tweak to your requirement.
    1. BAPI_NETWORK_CONF_GETDETAIL - this will extract the data
    2. BAPI_NETWORK_CONF_ADD - this create/update the data.
    Thanks,
    Sudhakar

  • Automatic Confirmation of Transfer Order

    Hello,
    I have the following Scenario.
    I have 3 Warehouses defined, 1 for Reception material, 2 for finished goods. And it supoused to have the same configuration parameters.
    WH number 100 (Reception material area) when I do a movement with  MB1A mvt type 201 or 261, and generate the TO via LT06, the TO is not confirmed.
    But with the WH numbers 200 and 300 (finished goods area) doing the same example, Txn MB1A mov types 201 or 261, and generate the TO via LT06, the TO is automatically confirmed.
    I just check the Automatic COnfirmation section and for the 3 Warehouse have same parameters.
    What could be affecting?  Will exist a user exit to control this?

    Hi Marco,
    Please check SAP online help how confirmation is controlled:
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Please also check help in IMG:
    SPRO > LE > WM > Activities > Confirmation
    You will see that confirmation is coontrolled trough:
    - warehouse ID (whether 2-step confirmation is allowed)
    - storage type
    - movement type
    If your settings at movement type are the same and you experience different behaviour in your WHs, please check your settings of storage types.
    SPRO > LE > WM > Activities > Confirmation - Storage type
    You have to check settings of destinaton storage types (910; 914) in WH 100, 200, 300 as well as settings of source storage types.
    If there's no difference please check transacton LT06 itself - if you execute it in foreground mode it is possible to put a flag in confirmation checkbox.
    Please also check user exits in SE38. Here you can find list of possible user exits:
    SPRO > LE > WM > Tools > Develop User Exits for WM
    ...or please switch to debug mode and check from where confirmation req. comes...
    Regards,
    Csaba

  • Automatic confirmation indicator set in TO

    Dear forum
    I am creating a transfer order with reference to a delivery, using transaction LT03.
    But when I look at the transfer order in display mode after it is created, the Confirmation indicator (LTAK-KQUIT) is set automatically in the TO.
    How is the configuration made to avoid having the confirmation indicator set in the transfer order?
    I had a look at the IMG settings in LE->WM->Activities->Confirmation and removed the "Confirm immediately" indicator set for the movement type 601 GI for delivery...but it did not do it for me, the Confirmation indicator is still set in the transfer order.
    Anyone knows?
    thanks

    IMG settings in LE->WM->Activities->Confirmation
    From SAP Help:
    "Immediate confirmation of a transfer order item only works out
    *if the respective movement type does not disallow this
    *if the storage type from which the materials are picked is not subject to pick confirmation
    *if the storage type into which the materials are put away does not have a putaway confirmation requirement."
    If you remove any of this conditions, then the stock transfer order will not be set to confirmed automatically. In my case, I just had to set the "confirm stock removal" indicator for the storage type in question, in order to remove the automatic confirmation indicator in the stock transfer order.

  • Automatic Confirmation of Vendor Changes

    Hi friends,
    We are developing a Z report to automatically confirm some modifications in vendors. On the first part of this Z report we describe an internal table and fill it with the vendor codes (field LIFNR) that need to be confirmed.
    On the second part of the report we are suposed to update field LFA1-CONFS for these vendors, but direct updates of databse are banned (of course). I've found a function Module called "VENDOR_UPDATE" that could help, but it needs tons of mandatory tables, so I wonder if there is any other Function Module to update this field: LFA1-CONFS, or if someone can propose any other approach to this problem.
    Many Thanks for your help.
    Ignacio.

    Hi Robert,
    It looks you're right about VENDOR_UPDATE, it would be like a direct update so it's discarded.
    About RFBIKR00 it looks that field CONFS is not allowed here so I doubt it is a way.
    I am now thinking on the following commands:
    set parameter id : 'lifnr' field aux_lfa1-lifnr.
    call transaction 'FK08' and skip first screen.
    As transaction FK08 is the correct one to confirm the changes and keeps a trace it looks the better approach. The problem is that I can't get this commands working fine, maybe I should add more parameters.
    How can I know the parameters I can use with this command?
    Thanks for your help. Your answer have been helpful and points have been assigned.
    Kind Regards.
    Ignacio.

  • No Automatic confirm for TO from PC

    Dear Expert,
    I will use external racking system and use idoc to the interface.  I have problem when using Posting change movement type 309, when source and destination bin is same bin. The TO showing the first line AS1 - 922 was automatically confirm and 2nd line 922 - AS1 no yet confirmed
    Our scenario need that both of line item should not confirmed, and will confirm using idoc.
    I already deactivate all setting auto confirmation in storage type, define movement type and interfacing movement type MM-WM.
    There is any advise to deactivate automatic confirm, or any users exist?...
    regards,
    Irwan

    Hello Irwan,
    this is a unlikely behaviour for posting changes TOs.
    In older releases (as far as I rembember), it was possible to get 1st item created unconfirmed but it was not possible to confirm the 1st item with a difference.
    The difference behaviour is the reason why it does not make too much sense to leave the 1st item unconfirmed after creation, because it was - and is - still not possible to confirm it with a difference or use a WMCATO to cancel it.
    So even if you manage to get it created unconfirmed and sent it by WMTORD, the only WMTOCO for this item is a confirmation, even if your subsystem does not find the stock/SU at the source bin. The difference hast to be reported in 2nd item all the time.
    We integrated this in our subsystem by detecting a posting change TO with 1st confirmed item and do not create a WMTOCO for this item after executing the posting.
    Best regards,
    Matthias

  • SAP APO CTP but NO wish for automatic confirmation on ALL codes

    Hi all you lovely people.
    We are in the middle of
    going into APO CTP, but we don't want automatic confirmation on ALL our codes
    towards our forecast created PReq, and to use Total Replenishment Lead Time as
    restriction is NOT possible in all cases.
    I need a possibility that
    can limit the automatic confirmation on requests as Sales Orders or STO, if
    they are above X pcs.
    On some codes X will be 0 and in others unlimited.
    Any experience or ideas ?
    Many thanks in advance and kindest regards.
    Dorte Krieger
    Denmark

    Hi all you lovely people.
    We are in the middle of
    going into APO CTP, but we don't want automatic confirmation on ALL our codes
    towards our forecast created PReq, and to use Total Replenishment Lead Time as
    restriction is NOT possible in all cases.
    I need a possibility that
    can limit the automatic confirmation on requests as Sales Orders or STO, if
    they are above X pcs.
    On some codes X will be 0 and in others unlimited.
    Any experience or ideas ?
    Many thanks in advance and kindest regards.
    Dorte Krieger
    Denmark

  • EREC :  To send automatic confirmation mail

    hi experts,
    Is possible to send automatic confirmation mail to the candidate's e-mail after competing application ?
    can it be done through process template ?
    Is there any standart workflows for this ?
    Regards
    Garayev

    Hi,
    I'd like to add a general thought
    When I learned SAP workflow (I admit, quite some years ago) there was a rule that SAP delivered workflows are in every case only examples you can check to get an impression what the application is capable of but they are never meant for production use. So you should never use SAP workflows in production. You might copy them but I see this as an option only for one or two of the e-recruiting example workflows. The others are just unmaintainable if you add everything for a production scenario.
    Similar rule applies to the SAP entries in customizing tables. While it is quite nice to use the e-recruitng search customizing from standard delivery as it is really a hell of work to do this from scratch, the activity customizing is anywhere between questionable and nonsense. Esp. with EhP 4 and above where SAP changed the application in a way that leads to new design recommendations for the acitvivity customizing but did not change the examples. The way to go is to delete the SAP entries and create a process and activity set really reflecting the project needs. So again the SAP example workflows won't match as you will have your ovn activity types.
    Rgds.
    Roman

  • Automatically confirm CR after Urgent Correction closed

    How do we setup ChaRM so that when an URGENT CORRECTION is closed, the CR is automatically confirmed.
    ie. Urgent correction > Imported to Production > Confirmed > Closed
    (at this point the CR would automatically change from Approved to Confirmed)
    Thanks!!

    Hi shivjansi
    I have checked the config in the IMG (as per your suggestion) and can confirm I have already set this up.
    ZDHF E0008 SET_PREDOC
    and
    ZDHF E0010 SET_PREDOC
    This should change the ZDCR status when the ZDHF is closed (E0008) or withdrawn (E0010).  But it's not happening
    With the ZDMJ I have added similiar config:
    ZDMJ E0013 SET_PREDOC
    and
    ZDMJ E0014 SET_PREDOC
    This is working fine for ZDMJ.  When a ZDMJ is withdrawn (E0014), the ZDCR goes from Approved to Pending Approval.  When a ZDMJ is closed (E0013), the ZDCR goes from Approved to Confirmed.
    Just need to get ZDHF doing the same thing! 
    Shivjansi - is there something else I can look at for ZDHF to get this working?  Thanks!!!

  • Automatic Confirmation for MVT 999

    hoe to set automatic confirmation of TO for movement Type 999 in WM

    Hello,
    Check view V_T333 (Ta->sm30). and enter the warehouse no and movemnt type.
    check the checkbox for  TO itrm can be confirmed immediately.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Nisha

  • How to automatically confirm check pay run (payment process request) in R12

    Payment Method = check
    The payment process profile (ppp) settings are as follows:
    Processing Type=Printed
    Payment Completion Point = When the Payment Instruction is Formatted
    Default Payment Document= blank/null
    Payment File=Send to File
    My question is this. Is it possible or how do you configure oracle payments (PAYMENT PROCESS PROFILE [PPP] and/or PAYMENT PROCESS REQUEST [PPR])for check payments created as a file output like you have in 'EFT' instead of printing the checks and CONFIRM the PPR/payments AUTOMATICALLY after the checks/payments have been formatted.
    The reason we are doing this is because we want an external agency to print the checks for my organisation.
    What is happening at the moment is that the PPR runs and the payments file is created successfully. At this point, the PPR is in 'FORMATTED - READY FOR RECORDING' status. The PPR then remain in this status until it is manually confirmed by clicking the 'Take Action' icon in the 'payment instruction' tab and then clicking on 'CONFIRM'.
    If the PPR is left in the above status, then the next submitted check pay run errors because the payment document(s) are still locked by the pay run that is in the 'Formatted - Ready for Recording' state.
    If it is not possible to configure Oracle payments to auto confirm the check pay run of this type, is an API available that can be called to confirm check payments - once they are in the formatted status.
    I've looked at the following notes in 'My Oracle Support', but they are not much use.
    Note 1097547.1 is related to bug 8781032 which talks about "Automatic Initiate when Payment Process Request is Complete".
    and then Note 1215392.1 relates to enhancement request.
    Bug 10142423: GIVE AN OPTION IN PAYMENT PROCESS PROFILE TO SUBMIT POSITIVE PAY FILE AUTOMATIC
    Thanks.

    Try running this SQL
    SELECT
    r.calling_app_id,
    r.created_by,
    r.payment_service_request_id,
    r.creation_date,
    r.call_app_pay_service_req_code,
    fa.application_name,
    fu.user_name,
    r.payment_service_request_status
    FROM
    iby_pay_service_requests r,
    fnd_application_vl fa,
    fnd_user fu
    WHERE r.payment_service_request_id = <<your concurrent request ID>>
    AND r.calling_app_id = fa.application_id(+)
    AND r.created_by = fu.user_id(+)

  • Unwanted automatic confirmation of transfer order

    Hi,
    I am kind of out of good ideas. The problem is following:
    I pick for production orders to fixed bins using several different WM movement types. When I am low on stock the production orders then cannibalizes on each other when picking in background. I dont have "propose confirmation" set in any of the WM movement types concerned.
    Ex.
    2 pcs are in interim storage type 914, then I generate a transfer order for interim storage type 924 (copy of 914), which picks from 914 and confirms automatically.
    thanks for any ideas of what else to check.

    Hi,
    the thing I need to understand is:
    1. why does the transfer order pick from another interim storage type in background.
    2. why does this type of movement between interims auto-confirm
    thanks

Maybe you are looking for