AVC and TOR

HI Guru's
This is regarding Confirmed date in the sales order.
In MMBE, enough stock is availble in unrestricted use stock.
I have created a sales order where the req delivery date is on 9/06/2011.
But in the schedule lines, system is displaying 2 delivery dates where the 1st line with today's delivery date is not confirmed
where as in the 2nd line, delivery date is displaying as 21.06.2011 with confirmed delivery date.
1. kindly let me know why system is displaying 21.06.2011 and why it is confirming on 21st.
Iam tring to test in IDES.

You have enough stock in MMBe.The qty confirmation depends on your avaialbility checking rule.Check in CO09 transaction why it is confirmed.In your availability check what are the perameters you considered to confirm future receipts ,stock ...etc.Check in MD04 also is there any open sales orders and deliveries available.If yes remove those then system will confirm current date.All your confirmation qty depends on which avilability checking rule are you used.

Similar Messages

Query in Av Check and TOR

Dear Sap Gurus,
I am a fresher in SAP ISU trying to learn the concepts of AV check and TOR.
Intial stock is zero for material 'x'.
Sale order is created for qty 10 of material 'x' and saved.
In schedule line system confirms that the material can be delivered on 11/10 /2010 , since inhouse production days is 1 day.
so on 10/6/2010 it can confirm '0' Qty and actual material ordered in the sale order which is '10' can be confirmed on 11/10/2010.
As per standard it is working fine.Now i do a GR for 10 material on 11/ 10/2010, now the material is in the stock (ie) confirmed atp qty is 10.
Then when i try to execute the same sale order number, delivery date on 11/6/2010 system is not allows me to do the delivery
even though stock is present. Pls explain me., how to allocate the current stock to this sale order.
In back order processing also i checked the same sale order is displayed as back order.
When i do backorder processing, as per the concept of back order i can change the already confirmed material for a sale order can be reassigned to some other sale order
For eg i had changed the confirmed qty for eg ( 5) to 0 and saved. system allow me to do when i click change confirmation in back order.
My question is after change confirmation , how i will allocate the same material to some other sale order. Pls explain how to do that?
Awaiting for your answer gurus.
Thanks
Sruthi

Hi,
Check the link
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/AvailabletoPromise+(ATP)
And also run V_V2- for rescheduling
Thanks
Chidambaram

How does Avilability check and TOR takes place in SD

How does Avilability check and TOR takes place in SD? if you have any Tax configuration notes please send it to my mail ID?
[email protected]
Gopal

ATP
Types of Availability Check in Sales and Distribution
Processing
There are three types of availability check:
_ Check on the basis of the ATP quantities
_ Check against product allocation
_ Check against planning
The following SD-specific control features need to be maintained in Customizing:
_ Checking group
The checking group controls whether the system is to create individual or collective
requirements in sales and shipping processing. In addition, a material block for the
availability check with transfer of requirements can be set here. The checking group can
also be used to deactivate the availability check. This option was created especially for
the assembly order so that when the bill of material is exploded in the assembly order,
the individual components, if necessary, can be classified as non-critical parts as far as
procurement is concerned.
The checking group specifies in combination with the checking rule the scope of the
availability check. It is proposed in the material master record on the basis of the material
type and the plant, and copied into the sales and distribution documents.
_ Checking Rule
You use the checking rule to control the scope of the availability check for each
transaction in sales and distribution. You also specify whether the check should be
carried out including or excluding replenishment lead time. The individual checking rules
define by transaction, which stock and inward and outward movement of goods should
be taken into account for the availability check.
_ Schedule line category
You can control with the schedule line category whether an availability check and
transfer of requirements should be carried out in the sales documents. The possible
settings for this at schedule line level are dependent on the settings in the requirements
class which is determined from the requirements type of the material.
_ Delivery item category
The delivery item category can be used to control whether an availability check takes
place in deliveries.
Requirements type
The various requirements are identified by their requirements type. The requirements
type refers to the requirements class and its control features.
_ Requirements Class
The requirements class contains all control features for planning such as relevance for
planning, requirements planning strategy and requirements consumption strategy. In
addition, it is specified at a global level whether an availability check is to take place for
the material in the sales and distribution documents on the basis of the ATP quantity
(ATP = available to promise) and whether requirements are to be passed on. A finer
degree of control can be obtained for sales documents using the schedule line category.
Replenishment lead time is only included in the check performed on the basis of the
ATP quantity.
Prerequisites
An availability check can only be carried out if the following prerequisites have been fulfilled:
_ The control elements described above for the availability check must be maintained in
Customizing for Sales and the relevant assignments made to the sales transactions
_ The availability check must be switched on at requirements class level and - for the
availability check in the sales documents - at schedule line category level
A requirements type must exist by which the requirements class can be found
_ A plant must be defined. It can either be proposed from the customer or material master
record or can be entered manually in the document.
_ A checking group must be defined in the material master record on the Sales/plant data
screen in the Availability check field
Configuring entries of the Availability Check
IMGSDBasic fncsAvailability check and TORAvailability checkAvailability check with ATP logic or against planningDefine checking groups
You can use SAP std checking groups of 01 for summarized reqts or 02 for daily reqts or u can create ur own.
The columns total sales and total deliveries are selection options whereby u can configure a checking rule to sum up reqts to post to MRP either individually or by day or week.
Column 5, Block qty; set this block if u want several users to be able to process the material simultaneously in different transactions without blocking each other. The No Check indicator is used when u want a material to not be relevant for an ATP check.
Defining a material block for other users. The Block checkbox is an indicator that enables u to block the particular material from being checked for availability if it is already being checked at the same time by another user.
Defining the default value for checking groups. However should no entry exist for the checking group in the material master record, one can set a default value per material type and plant.
Controlling the availability check. In this section, u tell the system what stock on hand and what inward and outward movements of stock it must take into account when performing the availability check. These settings are based on the checking group that is assigned to the material master record and the checking rule that is predefined and assigned to the sd transaction. The carry out control for the availability check must be maintained for both the sales order and delivery.
TOR
IMG  SD  Basic fncs  Availability check and TOR  TOR
A line item in the sales order creates a schedule line. The schedule lines in the sales order transfer the requirements through to MRP. You can select the docs on which you want the TOR to happen. For ex, not for quotations.
The TOR aims to ensure the ordered materials are available for the requested delivery date. The TOR can be set for individual or for collective requirements (materials mastersales/plant view).
The TOR is dependent on the following data:
The reqts type, reqts class, checking group and schedule line category.
The reqts type and class are determined in the strategy group (material masterMRP3)
For TOR to be carried out, a few criteria need to be met:
Plant assigned to line item level, schedule line category should be switched on at TOR, TOR must be switched on at the reqts class level, checking group must be defined and allocated to the material master record (sales/plant view in the availability check field)
The reqts class is the controlling factor for the availability check and the TOR for all sd types.
Configuring the TOR:
1) Use std 041 reqts class or copy and rename it. Use the indicators to select if this reqts class must carry out an availability check and/or a TOR.
2) Define the reqts types. A reqts type is allocated to a single reqts class and not vice versa. It is based on the item category and the MRP type of the material.
3) Assign the rqts type to the relevant item category in the sales order and the MRP type found on the material master record.
You can select an alternative search strategy where u assign the reqts type to item category and MRP type. Can select source as 0, 1 or 2. (1 = Item type and MRP type strategy).
4) The TOR and Availability check can be selected/de-selected at the schedule line category level.
5) Block qty confirmation in delivery blocks. This is used to block the reservation of the TOR from MRP.
6) Maintain requirements for TOR. Requirements can be used to determine that the TOR to MRP is not carried out unless a number of conditions are met.
Availability Overview = CO09  order qty, sd doc no, item no, requirements class.
Stock requirements list = MD04  sd no or dly no, line item, schedule line placing the demand
Stock overview = MMBE  total stock per company, then plant followed by storage location, and finally a breakdown per batch
this is the customising as weel as the knowledge part.
PLease award pints if helpful
thanks

Instantclient and tora

Sir,
1. I have Fedora core 4 installaed on compaq nx7010.
2. Downloaded instantclient RPM's and zip's, and followed the tons of instructions, forums etc. Tried every which way and it connected remotely to Oracle database, ultimately. Here is my way:
a. Though "export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$HOME/oracle/instantclient_10_2" is there in the .bash_profile, but on issuing command "echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH" gives "/var". Therefore, before connection to oracle I have to issue "LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$HOME/oracle/instantclient_10_2", thereafter it gives correct output of "echo LD_LIBRARY_PATH".
Any idea?
b. To get instantclient_10_2 connected to oracle, by no means an easy task. I could finally connect by giving the command "sqlplus user_name/pass_word@"(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=10.72.2.202)(PORT=1521)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SID = ds1)))", no other form of the command seems to be working. Why other forms not working?
3. I have installed tora 1.3.16 OK, but tora-oracle-1.3.16-1.rhel4.i386.rpm with nodeps. tora window in Fedora 4 shows up in Connection Provider MySQL & ODBC but not oracle. Any how it doesnot connect to oracle like sqlplus does as above. I really need it. Is there a way to connect tora by instantclient.
I have no other oracle installation of any type.
4. It says some file name libclntsh is needed, I donot have that on my machine.
Thanks

1. I got some way around, might help you too.
2. Already installed tora normally (without nodeps), and tora-oracle with nodeps.
3. First run the command
"export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$HOME/oracle/instantclient_10_2";
so that LD_LIBRARY_PATH points as expected.
4. Now from terminal, execute the command "tora". Now that tora window in Fedora 4 shows up oracle too along with MySQL & ODBC in the Connection Provider.
Executing tora by system menu doesnot show up Oracle in the connection window of tora.
5, Please check whether it results into successful connection to oracle.

Reg available check and tor

Hi Friends,
Can any one explain me which one trigger first among available check and tor and how it works.
thanks
nitchel

Hi all,
I think TOR can't come first.
Let's assume a simple example at Plant.
Customer places an order for 50 pcs of a material, say XYZ.
The first thing what will one do is to check the quantity available in the stock for that material and if any shortage is there then only the requirement will be passed to prodution.
There will be two cases as a result:
1. Quantity in stock >= quantity ordered
The sales order will be easily executed for delivery of the material to customer.
2. Quantity in stock < quantity ordered
As the quantity in stock is less, a requirement then will be transfered/ passed to production to produce more pieces of the material to meet out the delivery.
So, an avaibality check is always carried out first over TOR.
Thanks & Regards,
Vijay
Edited by: VijayPrakash on May 27, 2009 12:46 PM

ASA5512-K9 CX AVC and Web Security Essentials

I have purchased the ASA5512-K9 with the CX AVC and Web Security Essentials L-ASA5512-AW1Y as recommended by a Cisco pre-sales representative and my reseller for my environment. I had previously believed from the documentation on the Cisco site that all X generation models had the CX software included on them in the state that they are sold. Now in trying to configure the ASA5512, and with further reading of the setup documentation, I have discovered that I do not have the capability to access the CX functionality with this model 'as is', and this combination does not appear to be appropriate. It appears that the CX software module is not actually included on the ASA5512-K9 model, but rather only on the ASA5512-SSD120-K9 model. Could someone please verify for me that I have understood this correctly?
If it is, then please advise if I should exchange the ASA5512-K9 for an ASA5512-SSD120-K9 to get the combination of this subscription license and ASA model working. Am I correct in that the ASA5512-K9 model does not have a solid state drive on it already and so I can not download and install the CX software on it? As an alternative, is it possible to purchase a Cisco solid state drive seperately, plug it into the ASA5512-K9, download the CX software, and then install it on this new drive in the ASA5512-K9?
I would greatly appreciate guidance from anyone who has experience with the ASA5512 line and CX. I was unable to find help from Cisco pre-sales and technical support for this question via phone or online chat, and my reseller has been unable to answer this question for me so far.

Hi!
According to many documents, i.e. page 3 of http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5708/ps5709/ps6120/white_paper_c11-727394.pdf
An SSD is required to run AVC and WSE on ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls. SSD bundles have the ASA CX software image pre-loaded, and customers receive a free 60-day trial of the WSE and AVC subscriptions.
An SSD bundle is ASA5512-SSD120-K8 (or ASA5512-SSD120-K9). So If you happened to buy ASA5512-K9 - Then you definitely need this SSD option - ASA5500X-SSD120=.
Cheers.

ASA NG 5515-X multicontext support for WSE/AVC and IPS

Hello,
I am designing network security with Cisco ASAs. I have a redundant core / distribution switching in VSS and 2 ASAs (Active / Standby) and trying to evaluate whether I could run multiple security services on one pair of ASA in virtual contexts rather then deploying more ASAs. I need to run DMZ so that it could go in one virtual context, then I need to run WSE, AVC and possibly IPS to protect internal users LANs and also deploy web and application security, here not sure if that is supported in a virtual context and with active/standby setup, apart from that I need to protect the servers with FW rules and IPS, here also a dilemma whether this will work in a virtual context and active / standby setup.
What would you recommend, having separate pair of ASAs for each security service or I could do all that with one pair of ASAs and multi context setup?
Thanks in advance for quick and informative responses.
Remi

OK cool. What is the purpose of the explicit context awareness in PRSM? Is it there but still not supported?
The only concern I have is about DMZ on same ASA pair. I guess it should be fine because I would not sent any DMZ traffic to CX module (where it would get mixed up with users or servers traffic) and since DMZ would be on a separate virtual context the security would be maintained. Also the DMZ will be kept on a separate VRF and will need to do VRF leaking from DMZ inside VLAN into servers VLAN in the services VRF.
How about sending both users (for WSE and AVC) and servers (for IPS) traffic into the same CX module? That would work fine?
Thanks in advance,
Remi

Help setting up a proxy for usenet (nntp) and Tor

I am trying to set up a newsreader (Thoth) to connect to a newsserver using tor (http://www.torproject.org/). The manual for tor (http://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-osx.html.en) shows how to do this for Safari, but not for a socks connection. Or is it as easy as setting the socks proxy to 127.0.0.1 and using port 8118.
Hope this made sense.

Look here, this will answer your query.
<http://www.northernsecurity.net/articles/torify_old.html>
Glad to help,
Ray

Iptables and tor, reroute all traffic for security... Help?

I'm attempting to route all TCP traffic that does not go through polipo through port 9040, tor's default TransPort. My web browser uses polipo to cache stuff, so I'd like to keep it in place if possible. However, all non-http traffic needs to be sent through the transPort. My current config, which does not take into account rerouting, is below:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.15 on Fri Oct 12 16:33:33 2012
#*nat
#:PREROUTING ACCEPT [12:3420]
#:INPUT ACCEPT [1:261]
#:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
#:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
#-A OUTPUT ! -p tcp -m owner --owner-uid tor -j REDIRECT --to-ports 9040
#-A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 9053
#COMMIT
# Completed on Fri Oct 12 16:33:33 2012
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.15 on Fri Oct 12 16:33:33 2012
*filter
:INPUT DROP [9:1175]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT DROP [8:488]
# allow loopback
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
# allow NTPD time syncs
-A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 123 -j ACCEPT
# allow tor
-A OUTPUT -j ACCEPT -m owner --uid-owner tor
-A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 9040 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
# allow BitTorrent
-A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 6969 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 51413 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 51413 -j ACCEPT
# allow pings (still not working. fix?)
-A OUTPUT -p icmp --icmp-type 8 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type 8 -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -j ACCEPT
# allow traffic on established connections
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate INVALID -j DROP
COMMIT
# Completed on Fri Oct 12 16:33:33 2012
as you can see, I've already tried to redirect traffic using the --uid-owner polipo rule. So far, it's just caused iptables to spit out errors. I'm stumped, so I thought I'd come to you wonderful people at the Archlinux forums for help.

Using the command you gave me, I found that the polipo user is indeed executing /usr/bin/polipo. Other than that, polipo is executing no processes.
I tried adding the following to my iptables rules nat section:
-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m owner ! --uid-owner polipo -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m owner ! --uid-owner polipo -j REDIRECT --to-ports 9040
polipo now works, but the rest of my traffic that should go to the TransPort gets blocked.
[EDIT]
I'm now trying the same thing, except that I've chained privoxy with polipo like so:
browser > privoxy > polipo > tor > internet
my iptables rules look like this:
# Generated by iptables-save v2.4.15 on Fri Oct 12 16:33:33 2012
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [12:3420]
:INPUT ACCEPT [1:261]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
#-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m owner ! --uid-owner tor -j REDIRECT --to-ports 9040
-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m owner ! --uid-owner tor -m owner ! --uid-owner polipo -m owner ! --uid-owner privoxy -j REDIRECT --to-ports 9040
COMMIT
# Completed on Fri Oct 12 16:33:33 2012
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.15 on Fri Oct 12 16:33:33 2012
*filter
:INPUT DROP [9:1175]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT DROP [8:488]
# general
-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m owner --uid-owner tor -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
# allow loopback
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p all -s 127.0.0.1 -d 127.0.0.1 -j ACCEPT
# allow NTPD time syncs
-A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 123 -j ACCEPT
# allow tor
-A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 9040 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 8123 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 8118 -j ACCEPT
# allow pings
-A OUTPUT -p icmp --icmp-type 8 -j ACCEPT
COMMIT
# Completed on Fri Oct 12 16:33:33 2012
and it STILL won't route traffic right. iptables redirects to the TransPort, but any traffic passed through polipo or privoxy reveals "connection reset" error message. Help?
Last edited by ParanoidAndroid (2013-03-12 01:50:51)

AVC and google hangouts

Hopefully a nice simple question but in AVC what applications do I need to add to my AVC profile to give priority to Google Hangouts?
I had hoped it would be nice and simple like Google Hangouts but apparently not. I'm running 7.6.120 software with AVC engine 13.

Thanks for all your help.
I'm downloading You Tube right now and will give it a go.
Also thought I'd tell you something else peculiar that might help out. I just went through all the sub folders under Privacy. This includes things like Location, Contacts, Calendars, Reminders, Photos, Bluetooth Sharing, and the Microphone. The only folder that has apps listed is the Photo folder. However, I cannot change the settings. They're on... but they're faded out and I can't switch them off. It is like they're frozen.
Alright, now to try YouTube

Where in Firefox do I find "the toggle switch for Tor"? I have installed both Vidalia and Tor, but I don't know how to turn on this privacy feature in Firefox. Where is the Tor button? Thank you! TorClient38

Any further ideas on anonymous browsing would be appreciated.

Hi,
You can try to '''Enable''' the '''Extension''' in '''Tools''' ('''Alt''' + '''T''') > '''Add-ons''', or right-click on it and '''Find Updates'''. Please note that if the '''Add-on Bar''' is hidden you may have to enable it by right-clicking on the + after the last tab. If all fails, you can also try to set '''No proxy''' in Firefox '''Edit''' ('''Alt''' + '''E''') > '''Preferences''' > '''Advanced''' > '''Network''' > '''Settings'''. [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Options%20window%20-%20Advanced%20panel?as=u Options > Advanced]
[https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Options%20window Options]
[https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/what-add-bar Add-on Bar]

Availibility check and TOR to MRP

HI all,
a) 1st scenario .During sales order processing, the schedule lines are confirmed based on ATP check since the stock is sufficient. In this scenario, i think the requirements are transferred to MRP. If iam right then my question is why are requirements t/f to MRP In this scenario since the stock is already sufficient...(the material is already procured or is incoming thru PO and that is why the schedule lines are confirmed).......... what will the MRP do in this case.
b) 2nd scenario , if the stock is not sufficient during atp check, the schedule lines are not confirmed in sales order and it makes sense to t/f the requirments to MRP since the material is to be produced/procured.
regards
sachin

HI all,
a) 1st scenario .During sales order processing, the schedule lines are confirmed based on ATP check since the stock is sufficient. In this scenario, i think the requirements are transferred to MRP. If iam right then my question is why are requirements t/f to MRP In this scenario since the stock is already sufficient...(the material is already procured or is incoming thru PO and that is why the schedule lines are confirmed).......... what will the MRP do in this case.
b) 2nd scenario , if the stock is not sufficient during atp check, the schedule lines are not confirmed in sales order and it makes sense to t/f the requirments to MRP since the material is to be produced/procured.
regards
sachin

ASA5515X - WSE,AVC and IPS - Application block per user

Can I enable web applicaction blocking based on user or group of users with WSE license or do I need another type of license.?
Thanks,
Ivan

WSE is always packaged, at a minimum with AVC. that combination on an ASA is all the licensing you need to block web applications per user. You will of course need to implement a scheme to identify your users in order to use their identity in a policy. That can be via local database (seldom used as it doesn't scale well) or via integration with your Microsoft AD infrastructure (via active authentication or optionally using the free Context Directory Agent (CDA) server running on a VM in your environment) or via something like the Identity Services Engine (ISE - a licensed product).

ASA5515-X HA with WSE,AVC and IPS.

Does the second appliance needs all these licenses or we just need one of them?

Ivan,
As of this time - when actively using the Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) services you mentioned in an ASA HA pair - both units must have the licenses for those services individually purchased and installed.
The only licensing relief you currently get is when using multiple device mode ("off-box") Prime Security Manager (PRSM). For PRSM's purposes, an HA pair of ASAs only counts as a single managed device.

Sales Order Confirmed Quantity Zero

Hi Experts,
Any idea how to prevent sales order from being saved in VA01 and VA02 when the confirmed quantity is zero ?
I know one way is through using user exit in MV45AFZZ but I am just wondering whether there is any config (SPRO) solution to this.
Thanks.
Regards,
T.K.

Hi,
If you are using AVC and TOR, then the system will be giving you the confirmed quantity, based on the duration it takes either for procuring the material or for producing the material, these are maintained in Material Master record. Confirmed quantity will be post date of the creation of Sales order.
But in OVZ9, for the combination of AVC and Checking rule if you check "Check without RLT' it will not give you any confirmed quantity.
I dont think even maintaining in Incompletion log. it will stop you from giving an error. So better solution is going for ABAP development. You can ask your ABAPer to write a program with logic saying system should not save if the field VBEP-BMENG is zero.
Regards
Vamsi Javaji

AVC and TOR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for