Avg, Min and Max with a serious twist.....ASO

Hi,
I need to calc the Avg, Min and Max on Revenue. That's simple. However Every row of data the revenue falls into a bucket/range. For example revenue is in buckets '0 to 50' or '51 to 100' or '101 to 150' lets say. As I load data I load a '1' into a 'Count' measure depending on which bucket that row of data falls into. So I can get a total count for each bucket. So '0 to 50' might have a Count of 3. '51 to 100' might also have 3 and '101 to 150' has a 2. So my range count looks like:
0 to 50 - 3
51 to 100 - 3
101 to 150 -2
The trick is they only want the Avg, Min and Max on the rows that makeup the highest 'Count'. In this case that's 3. Problem is there are two ranges that meet this criteria. When that happens they want the Min, Max and Avg of the rows that make up the '51 to 100' bucket since it's the highest range.
I can easily get the '3' by using the Max formula. So I know what the highest bucket is. Problem is I can't figure out for the life of me, how to pass only those rows that make up the '51 to 100' bucket into the Avg, Min and Max function.....
I'm stumped and in dire need of something here. I have a spreadsheet that explains the problem better. If somehow I can get a flag on those rows I can easily Avg, Min and Max it. I just can't seem to figure out how to get a flag on only those rows of data.
I'm willing to share my mocked up example and spreadsheet and .otl and sample data etc....
Please help :)

Why does this verify with Min?
Min ( Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Service].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Segment].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Leaves ( [Ranges].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Customer Type].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Zip Code].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Disposal Option].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Tickets].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Yardages].CurrentMember),
Filter ( Descendants ( [Contract Year].CurrentMember),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) ) , [FHRev] )
And when I just change to Tail and put a 1 at the end it fails?
Tail ( Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Service].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Segment].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Leaves ( [Ranges].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Customer Type].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Zip Code].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Disposal Option].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Tickets].CurrentMember),
Filter ( CROSSJOIN ( Descendants ( [Yardages].CurrentMember),
Filter ( Descendants ( [Contract Year].CurrentMember),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) )),
[High Range Max] = ( [High Range Max] , [All FHRev Ranges] ) ) , 1 )

Similar Messages

OBIEE- Calculating Min and Max Values

Hi Friends,
I have an Issue with regards to calculating Min/Max Values.
In my Data base we dont have Message Count. So we created a Logical column in BMM Layer called "Message Count" based on the column "Out/In No" i.e by creating count of it i.e (Count(out/in no)) in BMM
To calculate Inbound Messages we writing -- filter(Message count using messagetype ='i') at report level
To calculate Outbound Messages we writing -- filter(Message count using messagetype ='o') at report Level
To calculate Total Messages we writing----- "Message Count".
But Now we had an issue to calculate "Min Inbound/Max Inbound/Min Outbound/Max Outbound/Avg In/Avg Out" types of Messages.
To make it clear definition for MIN and MAx is Like This.
Say Ravi received(Inbound) messages      2
Say Roy received(Inbound) messages      5
Say Kiran received(Inbound) messages   11 on a particular date.
So for that particular date Min Inbound is 2
So for that particular date Max Inbound is 11
and Avg Inbound will be (2+5+11)/3
On this basis we have to implement it in OBIEE. For any more clarifications please reply to my thread.
Please reply to my Issue ASAP as it is critical and I am out of time.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards

Hi,
Do you mean to ask minimum stock in a plant and maximum stock in a plant over a period of time?
Due to receipts stocks flows in to the storage location of a plant. May be in one period there will be less stock or in one period there will be maximum stock.
May be history tables like MBEWH or MARDH or the report MC.9 ( you need to provide the period as input) etc for your case.If this is not your requirement please reply back.
Regards

Min and MAx Value in a SELECT Statement

Hi,
I have a scenario where I am Selecting the values BETWEEN MIN and MAX values:
SELECT * FROM ABC WHERE CODE BETWEEN MIN(CODE) AND MAX(CODE)
ITS GETTING Error as:ORA-00934: group function is not allowed here
Any help will be needful for me.

select substr(no,1,3)||to_char(substr(no,4,1)+1) "first missing number"
from
with t as
(select 'ABC1' no from dual
union select 'ABC2' from dual
union select 'ABC3' from dual
union select 'ABC5' from dual
union select 'ABC6' from dual
union select 'ABC8' from dual
select no, lead(no,1,0) over (order by no) next_no from t
where substr(next_no,4,1) - substr(no,4,1) > 1
and rownum = 1;

Find more than one min and max in 2D array contain 0 rows

Hi
I have a 2D array and I would like to find the max and min elements between series of 0s. As you can see in the picture If I remove all 0s from the array and use the max and min function then I will have just one min and one max but I need to find min and max after every 0 rows so you can see from the picture ( just as an example) I will have 3 min and 3 max numbers. Would you please help me with this code. Do you now any algorithm that can find min and max between 0s?
I have also attached my code to remove 0s and then search for max and min numbers but as I mentioned I need min and max for every part
Many thanks
Attachments:
2.jpg ‏82 KB
3.jpg ‏27 KB

Thanks altenbach
I have attached the vi to this post. I would really apperciate if you help me with this example. The min values should be 100, 1500 and 4000 and the max values should be 1200,2600,5400 so as u mentioned the output should be this 2D array
100,1200
1500,2600
4000,5400
Attachments:
new.vi ‏6 KB

Difference of value of a dimension based on min and max

Database: Oracle 10g
BO-BOXIr3
Let me explain the exact problem again.
As per the below code, I have the data in this format in my table:
Code:
Date              Site ID     KWH
1/2/2009 00:00     IN-1     22
1/2/2009 01:00     IN-1     28
1/3/2009 03:00     IN-2     25
1/3/2009 04:00     IN-2     46
1/4/2009 00:00     IN-3     28
1/4/2009 10:00     IN-3     34
1/5/2009 08:00     IN-4     31
1/5/2009 09:00     IN-4     55
1/5/2009 11:00     IN-4     77
1/6/2009 00:00     IN-5     34
Now want to build a report with following columns:
Site     Count     KWH
IN-1     2     6 (ex.-28-22)
IN-2     2     21
IN-3     2     6
IN-4     3     46 (ex.-77-31)
IN-5     2     34
SITE- distinct site name.
COUNT-count is number of repetitions of site id between min and max date.
KWH -(Delta between the min and max date)
To get the above result I have created 3 report from different queries since not able to get these al in a single report viz Count, Max Value and Min value. Well I have all these 3 reports or table on a single page.
Count-this report will give the count between the dates
Max Value-this report will give me the values of kwh for max dates for each site id
Min Value-this report will give me the values of kwh for min dates for each site id
Now want to create a single report based on these 3 reports which contains the column
Site|Count|KWH
IS IT POSSIBLE?
Or
Is it possible to build such report in a single one with all the required column which I mentioned?
The variables which I created to get the max & min dates,
Mx_dt= =Max([Query 2].[Hourly]) In ([Query 2].[SITE_ID])
Mn_dt= =Min([Query 3 (12)].[Hourly]) In ([Query 3 (12)].[SITE_ID])
For filtering on report used following variables:
if_st_mn=If([mn_dt])=[Hourly] Then "ok" Else "no"
if_st_mx =If([mx_dt])=[Hourly] Then "ok" Else "no"
will filter on "ok" to get the max and min date values.
rest of the variable in the snap are not usable.

Yes, you can do it in one report.
I created a sample report from efashion:
Year | Lines | Sales Revenue
2001 | Accessories | $250
2003 | Accessories | $550
2001 | City Skirts | $1050
2003 | City Skirts | $1150...........
Create 2 variables 1) Count and 2) Difference:
1) Count as formula - =Count([Lines]) In Report
2) Difference as formula - =Sum([Sales revenue]) Where (Max([Year]) In Report = [Year]) - Sum([Sales revenue]) Where (Min([Year]) In Report = [Year])
You can replace the formula with your report variables. Then just drag Site ID, Count and Difference variables to your report.
Thanks
Jai

After installing Version 5 I get an error message about incompatibility and min and max versions.

I shutdown Zone Alarm, and deleted the contents of the file, which contained the "exe" file, then reinstalled Firefox version 5.0. I still get the XUL Runner error message about incompatibility of Version 5.0 with min and max 5.0.1. What next?

The updater wasn't able to update all the files and some were left as older versions.<br />
You need to do a clean reinstall.
Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 5.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
* Uninstall your current Firefox version.
* Do not remove personal data when you uninstall the current version.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
* It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup

Performance Issue using min() and max() in one SQL statement

I have a simple query that selects min() and max() from one column in a table in one sql statment.
The table has about 9 Million rows and the selected column has a non unique index. The query takes 10 secs. When i select min() and max() in separate statements, each takes only 10 msecs:
This statement takes 10 secs:
select min(date_key) , max(date_key)
from CAPS_KPIC_BG_Fact_0_A
where date_key != TO_DATE(('1900-1-1' ),( 'YYYY-MM-DD'))
This statement takes 10 msecs:
select min(date_key)
from MYTABLE
where date_key != TO_DATE(('1900-1-1' ),( 'YYYY-MM-DD'))
union all
select max(date_key) from MYTABLE
Because the first statement is part of an autmatic generated SQL of an application, i can't change it and i have to optimize the data model. How can i speed up the first statement?

I've ran similar query on a table that has 10 milliion rows, with an index on the date column
This is what I have found:
SQL> set timing on
1 SELECT MIN(ID_DATE) MIN_DATE, MAX(ID_DATE) MAX_DATE
2      FROM MY_DATE
3*     WHERE ID_DATE != TO_DATE(('1900-1-1' ),( 'YYYY-MM-DD'))
SQL> /
MIN_DATE MAX_DATE
03-APR-76 06-JAN-02
real: 43383
SQL> SELECT MIN(ID_DATE) MIN_DATE FROM MY_DATE
2   WHERE ID_DATE != TO_DATE(('1900-1-1' ),( 'YYYY-MM-DD'))
3 UNION ALL
4 SELECT MAX(ID_DATE) MAX_DATE FROM MY_DATE
5   WHERE ID_DATE != TO_DATE(('1900-1-1' ),( 'YYYY-MM-DD'))
6 /
MIN_DATE
03-APR-76
06-JAN-02
real: 20
SQL> SELECT MIN_DATE, MAX_DATE FROM
2 (SELECT MAX(ID_DATE) MAX_DATE FROM MY_DATE
3 WHERE ID_DATE != TO_DATE(('1900-1-1' ),( 'YYYY-MM-DD')) ) A,
4 (SELECT MIN(ID_DATE) MIN_DATE FROM MY_DATE
5 WHERE ID_DATE != TO_DATE(('1900-1-1' ),( 'YYYY-MM-DD')) ) B
6 /
MIN_DATE MAX_DATE
03-APR-76 06-JAN-02
real: 10
SQL> My conculsion, there is nothing you can do to the tables that will improve that particular statement.
Why can't you modify the application?

Min and max constraints

In my database design and implementation module I'm at the implementation stage. I've set up all of my tables with PK and FK constraints and I'm wondering if you can enforce min and max column constraints. One of the rules of my DB is for my staff table there has to be a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 50, how would I enforce this rule as a constraint on the staff table or isn't this possible?
We have only been learning database design and SQL fundamentals so I don't think I'd be allowed to use triggers or procedures.
Many thanks
Mike

mharper wrote:
thanks guys these commands were accepted
alter table staff
add constraint chk_staff_max check (staff_id <= 50);
alter table staff
add constraint chk_staff_min check (staff_id >= 10);
Thing is my staff_id's are in the format 'S110001' will these constraints only check for integers 10 - 50? maybe I need to use a count function on the column or something?
thanks again for your help!
MikeCheck constraint can also be used to check a list of values.
example:
ALTER TABLE <table_name>
ADD CONSTRAINT <constraint_name>
CHECK (<column_name> LIKE <condition>);
ALTER TABLE <table_name>
ADD CONSTRAINT <constraint_name>
CHECK (<column_name> NOT LIKE <condition>);
ALTER TABLE <table_name>
ADD CONSTRAINT <constraint_name>
CHECK (<column_name>
IN (<comma delimited list of values>);
ALTER TABLE <table_name>
ADD CONSTRAINT <constraint_name>
CHECK (<column_name>
NOT IN (<comma delimited list of values>);
ALTER TABLE <table_name>
ADD CONSTRAINT <constraint_name>
CHECK (<column_name> BETWEEN <lower_value>
AND <higher_value>);
ALTER TABLE <table_name>
ADD CONSTRAINT <constraint_name>
CHECK (<column_name>
NOT BETWEEN <lower_value> AND <higher_value>);
ALTER TABLE <table_name>
ADD CONSTRAINT <constraint_name>
CHECK (<column_name>) > (<condition>);

Formula for MIN and MAX per range required in BW

Good day
Please assist with the following? I need to create a formula (CKF) in BW Query which will give me the same result as the following formula in Excel.
What I have is one Key Figure and want to calculate a Score on that key figure.
Score =Key figure/(MAX(range of ie. column B1 to B50 which contains data for the same KF)-MIN(range of ie. column B50 which contains data for the same KF).
In excel it's easy, ie" Score =TD completed/(MAX(B28:B130)-MIN(B28:B130)
If more information is required to assist, please let me know?
Always appreciated.
Cornelius

Thank U so much for responding so fast.
I did the MIN and MAX formula, but it is only taking the MIN or MAX from the single cell of the applicable key figure and not from a 'range' of cells. This is a further example of what I want to do:
Cell: B1 = 10
        B2 = 12
        B3 = 15
        B4 = 0
I want to display the MIN as '0' and the MAX as '15' and then do the calculation per row.
We are in 3.2x. I want to stay away from structures as I have not done that before.
Any other assistance will be highly appreciated.
Cornelius

Highlighting Min and Max Values on each line

Hello,
Is it possible to highlight the Min and Max values on each row of a Query. For example I have sales below by product line for the last seven quarters. The user
would like the Max value (150) for Product Line ABC Highlighted as Green and the Min value (1055) color coded as Red. Like wise for each line - DEF 200 as green and 100 as red and GHI - 400 as green and 100 as red.
FYQ Q207 Q307 Q407 Q108 Q208 Q308 Q408
ABC     1500     1200     1400     1050     1100     1100     1100
DEF     1550     1000     1560     1220     1340     1640     2000
GHI     1000     2000     3000     4000     3250     2220     3750
Is this possible using Exceptions? or may be any other means? We are on Bex 7.0
Best Regards,
Sanjiv

Hello Sanjiv,
I think it can be done by JavaScript, but needs more effort
[Use of JavaScript Functions|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/d9/4a853bc623c075e10000000a114084/content.htm]
Try the exception available in the BW[BW Stylesheets|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/3f/ca453afbf37b54e10000000a11402f/content.htm]
SAPBEXformats - Formatting cell (scaling factors)
SAPBEXexcGood1 - Exception with priority good 1
SAPBEXexcGood2 - Exception with priority good 2
SAPBEXexcGood3 - Exception with priority good 3
SAPBEXexcCritical4 - Exception with priority critical 4
SAPBEXexcCritical5 - Exception with priority critical 5
SAPBEXexcCritical6 - Exception with priority critical 6
SAPBEXexcBad7 - Exception with priority bad 7
SAPBEXexcBad8 - Exception with priority bad 8
SAPBEXexcBad9 - Exception with priority bad 9
See this thread,
Change the colour of a cell text depending on the value Web Reports (NW04s)
Thanks
Chandran
Edited by: Chandran Ganesan on Mar 19, 2008 4:27 PM

Global Change or filter based on Min and Max dates

Hi Guys,
Hopefully there is a genius out there that is an expert with filters and or global changes, I am after a solution and can’t work out if it is possible to do in P6.
Based on a filter (using codes to select a group of activities) I want to write a value into two date UDF Fields can I:
Run a global change to give the earliest and latest date in the group and write the result to all tasks in the group? or
Is there a mindate maxdate option in Global change or filter? Or
If these tasks were grouped in the activity view can a global change be written to fill down the dates that the summary level is displaying, which are essentially the min and max dates of the groups.
I could do this pretty easily in excel but I have over a 100 projects and doing the import one at a time is not feasible.
I could create LOE’s but as my variables are constantly changing and due to the volume also not an option.
Summary bars are not an option eithers as I am writing the UDF’s to get all the bars I want on one line,
An option for me might be to do it using Legare but I would prefer to see if I can get it done in P6 first.
Cheers
Rob

Yes, you can do it in one report.
I created a sample report from efashion:
Year | Lines | Sales Revenue
2001 | Accessories | $250
2003 | Accessories | $550
2001 | City Skirts | $1050
2003 | City Skirts | $1150...........
Create 2 variables 1) Count and 2) Difference:
1) Count as formula - =Count([Lines]) In Report
2) Difference as formula - =Sum([Sales revenue]) Where (Max([Year]) In Report = [Year]) - Sum([Sales revenue]) Where (Min([Year]) In Report = [Year])
You can replace the formula with your report variables. Then just drag Site ID, Count and Difference variables to your report.
Thanks
Jai

MIN and MAX datetimes ti find range

I am using Oracle 11g version
create table re(Name char(20),Datetime char(45),val1 number);
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:00','1.5')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:05','1.5')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:10','1.5')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:15','1.5')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:20','0.00')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:25','0.00')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:30','0.00')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:35','0.00')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:40','2.1')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:45','2.3')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:50','2.1')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:55','2.1')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 14:00','2.2')
O/P:
In this way data is stored in database.Needed output is, I want the datetime column data range with min and max values where val1>0 only.
Expected result while we consider the above data is::
Name mintime maxtime
abc 10/19/2012 13:00 10/19/2012 13:15
abc 10/29/2012 13:40 10/29/2012 14:00
For this I tried something like this,
select name, min(to_date(Datetime ,'mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi')) start, max(to_date(Datetime ,'mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi')) end from (
select name, Datetime ,to_date(Datetime ,'mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi') - rank() over (partition by loc_name order by t1 asc) Val_col from re where val1 > 0
) group by lname, Val_col
but I am getting the output like this for above query.
name start end
abc 10/29/2012 13:00 10/29/2012 13:00
abc 10/29/2012 13:05 10/29/2012 13:05
so.on.
Edited by: 913672 on Apr 3, 2013 3:07 AM

913672 wrote:
I am using Oracle 11g version
create table re(Name char(20),Datetime char(45),val1 number);
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:00','1.5')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:05','1.5')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:10','1.5')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:15','1.5')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:20','0.00')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:25','0.00')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:30','0.00')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:35','0.00')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:40','2.1')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:45','2.3')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:50','2.1')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 13:55','2.1')
insert into re values('abc','10/29/2012 14:00','2.2')
O/P:
In this way data is stored in database.Needed output is, I want the datetime column data range with min and max values where val1>0 only.
Expected result while we consider the above data is::
Name mintime maxtime
abc 10/19/2012 13:00 10/19/2012 13:15
abc 10/29/2012 13:40 10/29/2012 14:00
For this I tried something like this,
select name, min(to_date(Datetime ,'mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi')) start, max(to_date(Datetime ,'mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi')) end from (
select name, Datetime ,to_date(Datetime ,'mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi') - rank() over (partition by loc_name order by t1 asc) Val_col from re where val1 > 0
) group by lname, Val_col
but I am getting the output like this for above query.
name start end
abc 10/29/2012 13:00 10/29/2012 13:00
abc 10/29/2012 13:05 10/29/2012 13:05
so.on.Firstly and most importantly do NOT store dates as char columns: that's what the DATE type is for.
Secondly, i'm not sure how you get your output from the input, particularly as your SQL contains 'partition by loc_name' which
doesn't even exist in your example table.
Why has the same name got two rows with those min/max times. Are you partitioning by val1?

Min and Max values from entire table

Hi,
i have requirement in which i need to find the min and max values from the entire table.
See the sample data
create table test
Sal1 int,
Sal2 int,
Sal3 int
insert into test values (100,700,5700)
insert into test values (200,3300,5300)
insert into test values (4400,1200,3500)
insert into test values (5400,5600,3100)
i want the output as 100 and 5700.. how can i achieve this in a single query. Please through some light on this topic..!
Thanking you in advance
Regards,
Balaji Prasad B
Balaji - BI Developer

Below is an example with a subquery for each of the queries Mohammad posted in order to return both min and max in a single result set.
SELECT ( SELECT MAX(Maxx) AS Maxx
FROM test UNPIVOT
( Maxx FOR E IN ( Sal1, Sal2, Sal3 ) ) AS unpvt
) AS Maxx
, ( SELECT MIN(Minn) Minn
FROM test UNPIVOT
( Minn FOR E IN ( Sal1, Sal2, Sal3 ) ) AS unpvt
) AS Minxx;
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

Select just the values between min and max of an accumulated value over day

Hello Forum,
a value is accumulated over a day and over a period of time. Next day the value is reseted and starts again to be accumulated:
with sampledata as (select to_date('09.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 23 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 29 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 30 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 45 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 60 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 75 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 95 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 17:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('09.09.2012 23:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 14 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 34 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 58 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 70 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
                   select to_date('10.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual)
select   ts, val
from     sampledata
order by ts asc;How should I change the select statement to skip all data sets before the first minimum and the duplicates after the maximum of a day in order to get such a result:
TS     VAL
09.09.12 06:12     23
09.09.12 07:12     29
09.09.12 08:12     30
09.09.12 09:12     45
09.09.12 10:12     60
09.09.12 11:12     75
09.09.12 12:21     95
09.09.12 13:21     120
09.09.12 14:21     142
10.09.12 06:12     14
10.09.12 07:12     34
10.09.12 08:12     58
10.09.12 09:12     70
10.09.12 10:12     120
10.09.12 11:12     142
10.09.12 12:21     153Thank you

This solution works perfectly when the accumulated value has its low and its high on the same day. But I found out :( , that there is also data, which has its low yesterday and its high today. For a better understandig of the case, there is a machine, wich is working over 3 Shifts with irregular start and end time. For example Shift1 cann start at 5:50 or at 7:15. The accumulated value of the worked time is accumuated for each shift extra. This solution works for the shift 1 (approximate between 06:00-14:00) and for the shift 2(approximate between 14:00-22:00), because there is the low and the high of the accumulated value on the same day. This solution does not work for the shif 3(approximate between 22:00-06:00), because the high of the accumulated value is or can be the next day.
So the thread title should be: "Select just the values between min and max of an accumulated value over the same day(today) or over two successive days (yesterday and today)
Sampledata for shift 1 or shift 2:
{code}
with sampledata as (select to_date('09.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 23 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 29 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 30 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 45 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 60 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 75 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 95 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 17:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 23:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 143 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 144 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 145 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 147 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 148 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual)
, got_analytics     AS
     SELECT ts, val
     ,     MIN (val) OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
                    ORDER BY      ts DESC
                    )      AS min_val_after
     ,     CASE
          WHEN ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
                         ORDER BY     val
                         ,      ts
                         ) = 1
          THEN -1 -- Impossibly low val
          ELSE LAG (val) OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
                         ORDER BY      ts
          END           AS prev_val
     ,     MIN (val) OVER (PARTITION BY     TRUNC (ts))
                    AS low_val_today
     ,     NVL ( LAST_VALUE (val) OVER ( ORDER BY ts
                         RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
                              AND     ts - TRUNC (ts) PRECEDING
          , -1
          )          AS last_val_yesterday
     FROM sampledata
SELECT     ts
,     val
FROM     got_analytics
WHERE     val          <= min_val_after
AND     val          > prev_val
AND     (      val     > low_val_today
     OR     val     != last_val_yesterday
ORDER BY ts
{code}
with the expected results:
{code}
1     09.09.2012 06:12:02     23
2     09.09.2012 07:12:03     29
3     09.09.2012 08:12:04     30
4     09.09.2012 09:12:11     45
5     09.09.2012 10:12:12     60
6     09.09.2012 11:12:13     75
7     09.09.2012 12:21:24     95
8     09.09.2012 13:21:26     120
9     09.09.2012 14:21:27     142
10     10.09.2012 06:12:02     143
11     10.09.2012 07:12:03     144
12     10.09.2012 08:12:04     145
13     10.09.2012 09:12:11     146
14     10.09.2012 10:12:12     147
15     10.09.2012 11:12:13     148
16     10.09.2012 12:21:24     153
{code}
And the sampledata for shift 3 is:
{code}
with sampledata as (select to_date('08.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 23 val from dual union ALL
select to_date('08.09.2012 02:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 45 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 05:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 78 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 06:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 08:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 10:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 12:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 16:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 17:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 19:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 21:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 22:00:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 24 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 22:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 40 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 23:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 68 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 79 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 124 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 125 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 126 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 17:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union ALL
select to_date('09.09.2012 22:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 5 val from dual union ALL
select to_date('09.09.2012 22:51:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 23 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 23:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 40 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 50 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 60 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 78 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 145 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual)
, got_analytics AS
SELECT ts, val
, MIN (val) OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
ORDER BY ts DESC
) AS min_val_after
, CASE
WHEN ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
ORDER BY val
, ts
) = 1
THEN -1 -- Impossibly low val
ELSE LAG (val) OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
ORDER BY ts
END AS prev_val
, MIN (val) OVER (PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts))
AS low_val_today
, NVL ( LAST_VALUE (val) OVER ( ORDER BY ts
RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
AND ts - TRUNC (ts) PRECEDING
, -1
) AS last_val_yesterday
FROM sampledata
SELECT ts
, val
FROM got_analytics
WHERE val <= min_val_after
AND val > prev_val
AND ( val > low_val_today
OR val != last_val_yesterday
ORDER BY ts
{code}
with the unexpected results:
{code}
- ts val
1     08.09.2012 00:04:08     23
2     08.09.2012 22:12:13     40
3     08.09.2012 23:21:24     68
4     09.09.2012 22:21:33     5
5     09.09.2012 22:51:33     23
6     09.09.2012 23:21:33     40
7     10.09.2012 00:04:08     50
8     10.09.2012 01:03:08     60
9     10.09.2012 02:54:11     78
10     10.09.2012 03:04:08     142
11     10.09.2012 04:04:19     145
12     10.09.2012 05:04:20     146
{code}
The result should be:
{code}
- ts val
1     08.09.2012 00:04:08     23
2     08.09.2012 02:04:08     45
3     08.09.2012 05:03:08     78
4     08.09.2012 06:54:11     90
5     08.09.2012 22:00:12     24
6     08.09.2012 22:12:13     40
7     08.09.2012 23:21:24     68
8     09.09.2012 01:03:08     79
9     09.09.2012 02:54:11     124
10     09.09.2012 03:04:08     125
11     09.09.2012 04:04:19     126
12     09.09.2012 05:04:20     127
13     09.09.2012 22:21:33     5
14     09.09.2012 22:51:33     23
15     09.09.2012 23:21:33     40
16     10.09.2012 00:04:08     50
17     10.09.2012 01:03:08     60
18     10.09.2012 02:54:11     78
19     10.09.2012 03:04:08     142
20     10.09.2012 04:04:19     145
21     10.09.2012 05:04:20     146
{code}
Thank you for your help!

I have a datetime axis stuck on 1970 for both min and max..

I have a datetime axis stuck on 1970 for both min and max..
The lineseries dataprovider has an array collection with objects
with each object having a dateAdded2 attribute of format mm/dd/yyyy
and the dates are in this year 2008. the objects also have an
attribute called amount which is a number.
eg
object.dateAdded2 = "07/14/2008"
object.amount =5
Anyone with any idea what is going wrong? Similar type of
data works fine in my other charts.

Pull the CPU cover and look for leaks from the LCS.
If the gray mat is wet, the LCS has leaked and the machine will soon be dead.
PowerMac G5 Coolant Leaks/Repairs
PowerMac G5 Coolant Leak Repair/Overhaul (w/photos)

Avg, Min and Max with a serious twist.....ASO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for