Avoid Async Step in BPM

Hi experts.
I have a BPM and some of its steps are:
Sycn Step --> Asyn Step
How could I avoid the async step when the sync step message response is empty?
Thanks a lot.
Regards.

>
Christian Abad Chico wrote:
> Hi experts.
> I have a BPM and some of its steps are:
> Sycn Step --> Asyn Step
> How could I avoid the async step when the sync step message response is empty?
> Thanks a lot.
> Regards.
You can use a bridge.
Take a look:
/people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi

Similar Messages

Fault message in synchronous send step in BPM

Hi,
When executing a synchronous send step in BPM it is possible to handle application errors (fault messages) with an exception branch. But how do you get hold of the actual data in the Fault message(faultText, faultURL, faultDetail etc) for further processing (mapping)?
Kind regards Johan

Johan,
u have to define another container element in integration process.
For that container element an Async Abstract interface has to created with falult message as the message.
Do u have the fault message defined already...
Also go through this thread.
Fault message handling in BPM
-Naveen.

Transport Acknowledgement in an Ansynchronous Send Step in BPM

I tried this scenario /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/06/22/xi-playing-with-the-file-adapters-acknowledgments for a file acknowledgement in an ansynchronous send step in BPM and it worked fine.
This made me think of something else...
This SAP help site http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/65ce41ae343e2be10000000a1553f6/content.htm
says - for a "Permanent negative acknowledgment" the "Send step triggers system error for which you can define a specific exception handling."
I understood this as saying "If the tartget file is not placed, a system error is thrown for which we can write our own exception handling"
In the scenario explained in the blog the 'deadline branch' was made to wait for a few miutes and once exceeded, made to throw an exception "NegAck" which is handled in the "Exception handler branch"
So what i tried was, I removed the 'deadline branch' and retained only the 'exception handler branch' and made the 'send step' to throw a system error "NegAck" so that if the "Send Step" recieves a negative acknowledgement, it would throw this error "NegAck" which I have handled in the "Exception Handler Branch"
However, this did not work. Can anyone kindly explain where was my mistake?

Dear Bharath,
hmmm nice question...
The answer to this is....whenever you configure a async send step with "transport ack" it will never go into error..
the send step will either get a positive ack(if the file reaches correctly) or a negative ack(if there is some problem like password expires) but it will will never go into error and hence directly the control will never go to exception handler block...
consider the cases :
1. Async send step with transport ack and file reaches correctly : +ve ack is generated and BPM will stop
2. Async send step with transport ack and passowrd expires : the send step will not go in error but you will get error in adapter engine(RWB) so it will keep on restarting and corresponding negative ack will keep on getting generated but here also the send step has not gone to error but the message in AE has gone into error and hence control will not pass directly to exception handler block....what you can do is keep a timelimit thru deadline branch so that after that much time control goes to exception branch...
This should solve your problem...
do not forget to close the thread marking useful answers after your query is resolved
Edited by: Tarang Shah on Mar 30, 2009 4:10 PM

BPM status is "IN Process" even after all the steps in BPM are completed

Hi All,
we have designed a BPM for collection of messages and have a transform step .
In some cases all the steps in BPM get completed but the status of BPM is still in" In Process" and in SWWL transaction the status is "Started".
Even though the status is started we are able to get the desired output.
Ideally after the steps in BPM get completed the status should be "Completed".
please suggest why we are getting this status and how can this be resolved.
Thanks and Regards,
Rajesh

hi ,
I am using a fork and loop with a condition to end this loop.the condition gets satsfied.
The messages are coming out of the loop and fork but even then the status is in "InProcess"
thanks,
Rajesh

How to add a Wait Step in BPM for the synchronous send step

Hi,
we have a scenario where in one of the step in BPM is a synchronous step which sends data to ECC system and gets the Respose .
The Requirement is that we need to add a wait for the Synchronous step in BPM as the data sent to RFC(ECC) need to get comitted before sendng the response which requires some wait time.
Currently we are getting the Response to PI from ECC where it was reported as the response is not correct.
Is this possible to add wait

> Is this possible to add wait
No, this does not make any sense.
The BPM waits for the response anyway.
You could change the scenario to an asynchonous pair of messages.
But in my opinion the error is inside the ECC, because the response from ECC is not correct.

Expression must return the interface type in Transformation Step in BPM

hi,
We are getting below while activating the IP,
Expression must return the interface type SI_Send_AA
Expression must return the interface type SI_Get_AA
No semantic errors found
We have a Transformation Step in BPM,
In OM, Source is SI_Send_AA and Target is SI_Get_AA
Also Container variable points to the same Abstract SI's.
Few Thread's for Same are error are:
Error in BPM
expression must return the interface type
Transformation step in ccBPM scenario
Error while compiling Business Process
Even after checking these i am getting this Exception.
Please Help!
Thanks,
Mayank

Also Container variable points to the same Abstract SI's
Are you sure that you are using Abstract Message Interfaces only and that these are referring to relevant container variables.
Normally it happens that there is some mis-match between the message types/ interfaces that we use in the mapping and that we use in the BPM.
If still not solved, then delete the Transformation step --> save --> activate......then again Edit the BPM to include the Transformation Step.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Container variables in User decision Step in BPM

Hello,
I am using User decision Step in BPM.
When i use only text in "Title for Display" the BPM is activated successfully and Status in SXI_CACHE also shows 0.
If I use container variables in "Title for Display" the BPM is activated successfully but status in SXI_CACHE shows 99.
It shows the below error
"Problem updating an integration process with object ID 073AF2C620F43E839B2903344DEE29BB. Symbol 'CE/KO' expected at position 1 in expression ''
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Shabari

Hi Shabari, did you follow the steps for declaration of variables as in [SAP help for user decisions|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/42/c2a19fb4511d65e10000000a1553f6/content.htm]? How did you define your variable?
Maybe discussion [in this thread|BPM activation Error in SXI_cache; can help, it is unanswered though.
Regards, Martin

Multiple source messages in transformation step in bpm

Hello,
I am using a transformation step in bpm, I have two source messages and 1 target message, I got an error 'expression must return the interface type XXXX(in source message)', I checked my source message in interface mapping and the container element, the types do match.
All the interfaces in the OM as well as in the bpm container definition are of type abstract.
It seems to have something to do with the interfaces belonging to different software components?
I declared a usage dependency from one swcv (holding the bpm) to another (holding the abstract interfaces which cause the error in the transformation step), so that I can reference them in the bpm.
I thought it might have something to do on how the message interfaces are selected in the operation mapping. so I tried to select the messages through the depencency path, but that was of no help either.
Have I been clear?
Any ideas?
Thanks
Matthias

Since no receiver information is available in the transformation step, there can be no value mapping within the transformation step. If the messages to be transformed give values in different formats, for example different date formats, you must first normalize the values before the messages can be processed in the process. To do so, define a message mapping with a corresponding value mapping.
Check the help page below for reference
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/27/db283fd0ca8443e10000000a114084/content.htm

Correlation issue in JMS adapter - SYNC/ASYNC scenario without BPM

Hi,
I am working on a SYNC/ASYNC scenario with JMS adapter without using BPM. My scenario is SOAP<>PI>JMS. I configured the interface as below:
1. SOAP Sender channel
2. JMS Receiver Channel writing to Queue A.
     Module used:      a. RequestOneWayBean
               b. WaitResponseBean
     Correlation Settings:
               a. Set JMS Correlation ID to "XI Message ID"
               b. Store JMS CorrelationID of request (Checked)
               c. Set JMS Property to "JMS Correlation Id"
               d. Value = "XI MEssage ID"
3. JMS Sender channel reading from queue B ( I am exporting the message from queue A and importing into queue B)
     Module used:      a. NotifyResponseBean
     Correlation Settings:
               a. Set XI MEssage Id to "GUID"
               b. Set XI Conversation ID to "Stored JMS COrrelationID of Request"
I can see the cid in the message from queue A. But I observed thhat the header format of the message in Queue A is "MQSTR".
ISSUE:
1. While writing the message to queue A, below adapter log details(part b) concerned me:
     a. Message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6' successfully processed by channel
     b. Could not create acknowledgements for message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6'
I am not sure why I am receiving the message that " could not create acknowledgements"
2. While reading the message from the sender channel,I consistently get the error message as below:
     a. XI message ID corresponding to JMS message with ID 'ID:414d51205341504449442e514d202020c67b954b20005602'
          will be created as a new GUID with value '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'
     b. Error while processing message '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'; detailed error description:
          com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
          found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
Below are the blogs which I have already gone through:
1. JMS Synchronous Scenario without BPM - Correlation Settings and Transactional JMS Session
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b028f6f6-7da5-2a10-19bd-cf322cf5ae7b
2. Note: 1086303
3. Sync / Async Bridge without BPM
In the note, they mentioned something about header being "MQRFH2". BUt in our case, the header is "MSSTR". Not sure whether it makes any difference.
Please help.
Edited by: GP on Mar 9, 2010 4:24 AM

Hi,
detailed error description:
com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
This error would generally arose when there are multiple messages, got stuck in the outbound queue. Try to stop both the sender and receiver JMS comunication channels and clear both the inbound and outbound queues.
Once all the messages in the queue are cleraed, try posting the message again.
Regards,
Swetha.

Regarding send step in bpm--"send context"

i want to use the send step in my bpm with send context.
The send context is a freely definable string, which you specify in the send step. You query the send context in a condition in the receiver determination in the Integration Directory. You must specify the send context to be able to send messages from the same message interfaces to different receivers in different send steps.
but i did n't understand regarding the explanation given above.
could u plz help me out

Hi
When you use Receiver determination step in BPM to get a list of receivers for a send step.
You need to define send context to send messages from the same interface to different receivers in different send steps. As list of receivers is collected using receiver determination.
Now you can use this to set condition(send context) based receiver in ID Receiver determination.
Thanks
Gaurav

Receiver Determination with Synchrnous Send step in BPM

Hi,
Is there any way to use BPM Receiver Determination step type with Synchronous send step ?
Is it possible to send a request to multiple receivers synchronously and capture the response?
Appreciate for your response.
Thanks,
Rao.Mallikarjuna

Use malticasting, check out these blogs
Multicasting using Receiver Determination Step in BPM
and pattern number 6 in BPM with Patterns explained Part-2
Thanks!

Use of Receiver determination step in BPM

Hi,
I am not clear about the exact use of Receiver determination step in BPM. From my understanding, it is used for synchronous communication with many receivers configured, for eg. Multicast etc. Can anybody explain the use of receiver determination with any specific requirement example.
Regards,
Santosh

HI,
The usage of Receiver Determination depends on how you have designed your BPM. You can have the mapping getting executed in your BPM itself using a TRANSFORM step or you can do it in your Inteface Determination if you are not doing it in your BPM.
If you do the mapping inside the BPM using Transformation step, then you need to send the Message i.e. Mapped message . In this case, your Interface determination will only determine the Receiver Interface, and it will not execute the interface mapping . (if you are not providing the Interface mapping in the Interface determination).
Example is given here-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/14/d5283fd0ca8443e10000000a114084/content.htm
Thanks
Swarup

Receiver determination step in BPM

Hi, I have open a topic about BLOCK in BPM, as this link
Re: question on BLOCK in BPM
I descript the symptom in it, you can have a look.
But now I find that the problem is due to receiver determination step in BPM, not block.
So I think I'd better post it as a new topic.
Are there anyone familiar with the receiver determination step in BPM, or know how to correctly use receiver determination step in BPM. Specially the 'send context', how to set it and how to combine it in Integration Directory.
Thanks a lot

You use the send context to specify a condition in your recevier determination. If your BPM flow sends the same message type in different send steps to different destinations you can specify some unique text like "R3" or "LEGACY" in the send context of your send step. Then in the receiver determination you can specify a condition that says Process Step = "R3" send to R3 "Process Step="LEGACY" send to legacy system.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Jitendra

User Decision Step in BPM - PI 7.1

Hi All,
I have posted a wiki for User Decision step in BPM in PI 7.1, Please go through it and post your queries, suggestions and comments here.
The link for same is under:
Part1 - https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/userDecisionstepinSAPPI7.1-Part+I
Part2 - https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/userDecisionstepinSAPPI7.1-Part+II
Regards,
Sachin

Hi Sachin,
Nice job,
During my practice on this scenario. I have got an error please kindly guide me on this, may this error also clear for the others
*I got an error on SXI_MONITOR as:*
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">UNKNOWN_MESSAGE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:Stack>No object type found for the message. Check that the corresponding process is activated</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
The trace of the error as:
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">could not create BPE proxy for message, no XML object definition found for message 72485F6BFC78416A29EEE3EE10D09BCE</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
Please kindly guide me on this, Is the message has to validate at sender agreement? if not where is the error I am doing?

How to determine receivers in the send step in BPM?

Hi Guys,
I have 3 send steps in BPM defined with send context and for each send step i have defined a receiver determination in ID. Each Receiver Determination has a condition based on which identifies multiple receivers.
The BPM is failing and unable to determine the conditional routing. Do i need to add the receiver determination step before each send step so that it identifies the receivers.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Raj

Hi Guys,
Thanks for all of you for the quick replies and it is really a great help.
We have resolved the issue. The approach is as below.
we have a generic design used by multiple customers. For the interface where we have the BPM, we are doing conditional routing for each customer before they hit the BPM that is as soon as we receive the Asynchronus request based on the condition we direct the message to a particular BPM. Basically every customer will have different BPM process. ie we create the same BPM with different names specific to each customer and in this way we dont complicate the BPM process and we will know if any particular customer has problems with his process.
Please let me know comments or suggestions on the above approach
Thanks,
Raj

Avoid Async Step in BPM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for