Backflush in COR6

Hello !
I have the next situation :
When I do the confirmation in COR6, if I dont push the bottom "good movements" ,  it doesn't post the good issues only the good receipt and the system don't show any message and not send any movements to COGI.
All components have the backflush indicator check.
However, if I press the button, although I don't change any positions, the good issues are posted.
I have SAP ECC 6.0 Component version.
Can you help me please ?
Thanks...
Veronica

Thanks for have been answered.
I check all that you say but the process control indicator is not checked. Then the backflush should be posted immediately.
So, When I push buttom "good movements", the COR6 Tcode post the good issues, but if I don't push the buttom, it don't  post good issues. I think it shouldn´t be necesary to post the good issues with backflush.
Have you an idea about it ?
Regards :o)
Vero

Similar Messages

  • Component Quantity Backflushing proportionate to the confirmation qty.

    For a header material, I have maintained components with backflush indicator.
    When I post partial confirmation for header material, the BOM component's quantity is not being consumed proportionately, but are consumed as equal to that in the process order.
    e.g. for order of A of 10 pcs. whose component B requirement is 100 Kg.
    When I do partial confirmation by COR6 for 5 pcs of A and branch to Goods movement overview, the backflushed qty for B shows to be 100 Kg instead of 50 Kg.
    Please tell me what config part may be giving this error?
    Thanks in advance
    Kumar

    Thanks Shalini,
    But I am using process order, in which scheduling profile code is COR4.
    In this screen, we do not have the option for adjust quants in order in Confirmation subscreen.Do we maintain it some where else too?
    Regards.

  • Background Job in COGI(REM Backflush error handling)

    Hi Everyone.
    I have one question.
    Our company use REM Backflush .
    And Our REM profile setting is next.
    - Use GI Backflush at GR posting
    - Don't use report point backflush
    - Create cumulated and individual postprocessing record
    In this circumstance, we use T-code COGI to process backflush error.
    When I execute the COGI in online, There is no problem
    <b>But, After I make a job for background in sm37, When I execute background gob for COGI, There is a problem. In real, Background gob is will executed. But COGI errors remain as before.</b>

    Hi,
    Actually you should use
    Transaction          MF47
    Program              RMSERI11, for post process record.
    For post processing , manually entry like storage location and Batch number(if batch management is enabled) is required , if the post process record is created according to this error.
    And hence it is not possible to correct all the records by background job.
    Thanks
    Thamizh

  • WM-PP : Backflush a material from different bins in the same storage Type

    Hi Gurus,
    We have a business scenarion where we do manual staging for production , the staging area has different bins within the same storage type for the same material, I am wondering if there is a way to backflush the material from different storage bins upon prod. order confirmation (using a control cycle?)
    Thanks
    Kris T

    Look like it's not possible using the SAP standard.

  • Unit of Measurement issue in COR6

    dear all
    while doing COR6.getting error "units of different dimensions can not be converted"
    what this means and how can i solve it?
    Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Sep 29, 2011 1:46 PM
    Please use the subject effectively

    Hi,
    Are you using Z table for this? Check the MEINS field. Please check the tableT006T for the DIMID. Here observe what UOM is maintained. If the coversion of UOM is irrelavent also will get this type of error. Hope the above points taken care and solve the issue. Thanking you.

  • Error while backflushing

    Hi
    While backflushing the finished product in REM the system is throwing the following error message.
    Field Bus.area is a required field for G/L account 5990 2400750000
    Message no. F5808
    Diagnosis
    The value for field "Bus.area" in the interface to Financial Accounting
    is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field
    selection for G/L account "2400750000" in company code "5990" linked to
    the field selection for posting key "99".
    t to do
    It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field
    selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must
    otherwise define a value for field "Bus.area". If this is the case,
    contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up
    the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
    Can you provide some solution on this.
    Regards
    Mohan

    Check SAP Note 17483
    You have to maintain Business Area for your plant and division in Customizing Transaction OMJ7

  • Subcon PO: Can system change the qty proposed for backflush during GR?

    Scenario:
    We have a Subassy A (qty=1) which requires Component A (qty =8). We have component scrap maintained as 25% in the BOM.
    When we create the PO with qty as shown below, the following qty is proposed for the component A (80*1.25 = 100) due to component scrap.
    Subcontract PO with item cat L - Subassy A : qty = 10
    Component proposed is            - Component A : 100
    During GR we (101) the Subaasy A: qty = 10
    We backflush (543) the Component A qty =80 (system proposes qty =100 but we change it to 80.00)
    In subsquent adjustment, MB04 we consume/backflush (543) the additional issued components.
    Problem:
    IS it possible to have the system propose the component A qty as per the BOM ie (80 for 10 Subassy A parts)
    so that inventory control does not have to change the proposed qty during GR.
    Thank you in advance.

    Hi,
    You should try this.
    Create an entry sheet in which planned services are defaulted from the purchase order. You can determine the quantities suggested from the PO by specifying percentages (Entry sheet -> Create -> With planned services).
    Cheers !

  • Confirmation/backflushing of finished goods

    Hello all,
    We sometimes produce finished goods using other finished goods.  We have them added to BOMs accordingly, however, during Production Order confirmation CO15 they do not show up in the list of other components. Backflush indicator etc is set.
    What's the setting to allow us to confirm them? I poked around in Material Type setup but nothing caught my eye.
    Many thanks...

    Thank you for your replies! I apologize, I just realized I asked the wrong question. The finished goods components do show up in the confirmation.
    The problem is that these finished goods components don't create any demand in MRP. That's because we are on gross requirements planning.
    I guess this goes back to my needs to have both independent (PIRs) and dependent (OrdRes) requirements active in MRP, and SAP for some reason doesn't do that.

  • How to do backflush of alternate material in a bom?

    Hi,
       My user wants to do choose alternate material at the time of backflushing  according to material availability..
    currently we are maintaining as following priority - 1
                                                               strategy - 2
                                                                probability - for first material (100)
                                                                 rest of material as  blank.
    any body please guide me what should be the right procedure to achieve this.
    Already iu have searched found a thread Can we define alternate material in a BOM  try to apply our expert suggestion but it is not working.
    Kindly anybody help me to solve the issue.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sandeep Kumar Praharaj

    Hi Ramagiri,
      I have gone through your document but my user wants he should select the component according to his requirement.
    for that purpose i have opened the planned order in md12
    select the first component make the usage probability to 0.
    select the second component change the usage probability to 100
    after that requirement has been transfer from first alternate component to second alternate component.
    But after when i am trying to do the backflushing through MFBF second alternate component is not showing in overview screen it is still showing the first component.
    can u please help me why it is happening & explain how to achieve this point as you mentioned
    Thanks& Regards
    Sandeep Kumar Praharaj

  • To change movement type 261 to consider backflush qty in forecasting

    Hi experts,
    Can any one let me know what to do to consider the following issue:
    Client came to me saying that right now all backflushes using 261 movement type are looking like unplanned cosumption, which is not considering in the forecast.
    Is there any setting to the movement type 261 by that the backflushes (unplanned consumption) are considered in the Forecasting?
    if such setting is there I will create a new movement type for that: can I assign the new movement type to a particular to a plant?
    OR
    Is there any setting other than this to consider the backflush qyt to be considered in Forecasting?
    Thanks in Advance
    Srinivas

    generally if backflush indicator is set in the material master with value 1 in the MRP2 view of the material master then you need not to issue components using MB1A for 261 movement type. It happens automatically when you do confirmations in CO11N / CO15.
    Backflushing functionality will reduce the manual work when you have more components to issue for producing a product.
    Please explain your scenario in detail.

  • Reporting Point Backflush Error

    Hi Friends,
    I have a specific question. I am using a material in which Batch Mangement is active. Now when I use MF42N as collective backflush, I enter following data
    Scene 1: Input Data in MF42N Screen
    Plant
    Posting Data & Document Date (Current Date)
    Material
    backflush Qty
    Version
    Reporting Point
    When I enter this data System posts it without asking me Batch Number though Batch Management is active in Material Master.
    Scene 2: Input Data in MF42N Screen
    Plant
    Posting Data & Document Date (Current Date)
    Material
    backflush Qty
    Version
    When I enter this data (No Reporting Point), then System gives me error as Enter Batch (Which is correct as Batch Management is Active in Material Master)
    Please tell me why system is not giving error in Scene 1 where I am not entering Batch details.
    Please let me know if you want any more details on this.

    Dear Nilesh,
    In this case I feel may be by debugging we may be able to identify why the system is allowing you to post the material along
    with batch without mentioning the reporting point without error.
    Logically it should look for both the objects like reporting point as well as batch number(provided if you have assigned a REM
    profile with reporting point and activated the batch management for the product).Is the REM profile containing the reporting point
    as mandatory or optional?
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • MFBF - Read BackFlush Error message

    Hello friends,
    Can any one advice me how to read the Backflush error message text in MFBF transaction from se38 program while doing BDC.
    Thanks for immediate reply guys.
    Regards,
    Siva

    You may be stuck with copying the files locally and editing and then copying back to the network drive. I am not good with networks, but have noticed posts about network problems over the years -- often focused on specific networks. The solution is typically to deal with the PDFs locally and then copy to the network. In creating PDFs, it seems that some of the results had to do with the TMP folder usage, but I have no clue why.
    As far as AA 10.6.3, you must have a cloud version or something. The latest AA is 10.1.7.

  • Issue with Backflush when Consuming Fractions

    I am having an issue with back-flushing I was hoping Guru's  could help me .
    Here is the issue:
    In the BOM for every 1 EA of X(Parent) we need .025 EA of Y(Child)
    The parent part is X. Using CS03 and typing in a quantity of 20 pcs everything looks perfect. I would consume component Y .500 of a sheet.
    If you review MFBF for 20 pcs. of X  it wants to consume 1.00 of Y. (1 whole sheet instead of .5)
    I know I could put a rounding value of 40 on the X to fix this but that would not be an option for this particular process. Measurements of each of these is not exactly the same and very critical.
    Is there an issue with SAP consuming fractions? It seems to round up to 1 whole sheet when it should only consume .500 of a sheet. Do you know of a way to fix this?
    Any info would be greatly appreciated
    Thanks,
    Safi

    For some reason which is unknown for me, this topic is very hard to manage within SAP.
    We face exactly the same issue producing Tanks from steel sheets.
    Base Unit of Measure was EA for Sheets . SO, we create a copy of EA called ED (each with decimals) , allowing up to three decimals and assign it as an alternate UoM to the material. In Bom, we had, for instance, 3.6 ED to produce a tank.
    But, in reservations the quantities are stored as Base Unit of measure and without decimals, regardless the fact that you a have an alternative UoM , etc etc.
    So, if you consume the component based on MIGO and reservations, SAP will propose 4 EA (o 4 ED ! which is even stranger - because of double conversion between base and alternative UoM) . If you consume by backflush, you dont even realise that the GI is being carried out in that way.
    We are still waiting for some solution after we sent a message, describing the issue. It is advisable to search the SAP Notes to see if there is some solution .
    So far, alternative UoM is not the solution.
    You must change the base unit of measure to ED or have some manual procedure of checking the quantities.
    Of course, EA can be redefined with decimal parts, also, but this normally can lead to some other problems (other parts managed striclty in EA, i. e. a tank,  could be managed in fractions, 0.75 of a tank !!! etc. )

  • Process order confirmation error in COR6

    Hi Gurus,
    I am working as sap manual tester and facing below issue in Process order confirmation in t-code COR6.
    Batch 456 for component 350515 does not satisfy BOM requirements
    Message no. Z_MFG017
    Need ur help.
    Regards,
    Imran
    Edited by: imran.shek38 on Jan 25, 2011 7:16 AM

    Hi,
    Please check whether the Batch-Management checkbox is maintained for the component in the Material Master (MM02).
    Also, check the Transaction MSC2N for this component and activate the checkbox for batch-managed item in the BOM.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Kaushik

  • Production Order backflush creating Negative in Storage Type

    Hi All,
    We have setup storage types into which stock is replenished based on Min/Max. These storage types have been setup in a control cycle and supply area to backflush upon confirmation of the production order.
    I know this is user error, but when doing confirmation (CO15) or clearing COGI the user enters a batch not in one of those storage types (but available at IM level), it creates a negative in these storage types for that batch even though the storage types are setup NOT to allow negative stock.
    Is there any other setting or any notes that can be applied to avoid this issue?
    Thanks
    J

    OSS note 489754:
    The settings in Customizing which define that no negative stocks are allowed for the storage type, have only an effect on the transfer orders. In addition, you must also set message L9040 as an error message. For this, call up the Customizing and branch to: 'Logistics Execution -> Warehouse Management -> Interfaces -> Inventory Management -> Allow negative Stocks in Interim Storage Types'. There, execute point 'Control of System Messages in Warehouse Management' and enter message type 'E' for message number L9040.

Maybe you are looking for