Background stock determination fails to process Cogi records

We are in a process to Reprocess the COGI records which have been Backflushed through
DI u2013Backflush.
But It is found that system fails to process the records. giving the message u201C0 goods movements have been successfully executedu201D.
Stock is available for the material to process.
As per my assumption if the stock is available for the material then system has to populate correct store location and valuation type as per the priorities available in stock determination group and should process the records in COGI.
Regards,
Pravin

Dear Pravin,
What is the message you are getting when you click on message u201C0 goods movements have been successfully executedu201D ?
Please check
Ishwar

Similar Messages

SMS_DISCOVERY_DATA_MANAGER Message ID 2636 and 620. Discovery Data Manager failed to process the discovery data record (DDR)

Hi
I'm seeing this critical error on my primary.
SMS_DISCOVERY_DATA_MANAGER Message ID 2636 and 620.
Discovery data manager failed to process the discovery data record (DDR)"D:\Prog.....\inboxes\auth\ddm.box\userddrsonly\adu650dh.DDR", because it cannot update the data source.
Where these ddr's are actually under ddm.box\userddrsonly\BAD_DDRS folder
I see a ton of DDR files in that folder. Not sure if I can delete them, so I moved them to a temp folder. AD User discovery keeps generating them.
Any help ?
Thanks
UK

Check the ddm.log file for more information.
My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

How the stock determination process works

Hi All
Can any one tell me how the stock determination process works in inventory management?
if possible give me the steps involved in stock determination process .
Regards
M S K

Hi
i hope this helps
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/d8/2f3746996611d1b5480000e82de955/frameset.htm
regards
maniraj

Stock determination in process order

Hi Guys,
The scenario is raw materials are split valuated however they are not batch managed , i created stock determination procedure
when i try to do stock determination system display the stock based on valuation type but it is not possible to assign that valuation type to the component by clicking on copy , after that system doing batch determination i selected without classification , all batches are displayed but nothing can be copied , please can anyone tell me what should be done to assign valuation type to the component without batch?
Thanks and regards
Thamizhchelvan G

You are saying split valuation materials without batch managed.
and Batch determination is being done. contradictory.
Stock deteimation: Please look at the link below.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/EN/b1/c04b83439a11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
Edited by: Ratan on Jul 7, 2009 1:01 AM

Stock Determination process with examples

Hi all
I am working for the first time on Stock determination
I have created Stock det group G001
Created Rule R001
And assigned both(Stock det Header) to Plant 1000
Next in stock determination item table i have defined that
Special stock indicator - F store loc 001 has priority 1
and K Store loc 1 has priority 2
After that i have attached the rule to Inventory management application -to Mov type 201
After that i have assigned the in material master in MRP2 view
Now for that material i have carried out consignment cycle and the Goods are at consignment Vendor in MMBE let us say 100 is at Consignment vendor and 10 at company's own stock.
Can anybody throw some light How stock determination will work in this case
Thanks and regards
shailesh

Stock determination has to be enetered on "Plant data / stor.2" view (MARC-EPRIO)
Based on your settings, when you post GI via mvt 201, system should determine (automatically). FIRST goods from your own stock. If there's no own stock, THEN system should determine the goods from customer consignment.
Why don't you try it in your system?
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Apr 5, 2011 5:18 PM

Posting date issue for COGI records.

Hi all,
I have one issue regarding the posting date for the records which are being cleared from COGI.
_In case of MF47 (Postprocessing for REM) following is the behaviour,_
In this if GR has happened on say 1st and due to stock un-availability components are gone to Post processing, Now when stock of component inwarded on say 20th then GI posting happens on 20th in post processing record clearance
_Now in case of COGI (Automatic goods movement : Error handling) behaviour is different,_
In this scenario if GR has happened on say 1st and due to stock un-availability components are gone to Post processing (COGI), Now when stock of component inwarded on say 20th then GI posting happens on 1st in post processing record clearance
I want same should be happened in case of COGI also, is there any note/ correction/option available??
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Vinayak.

Dear,
There are backlogs from the backflush in repetitive manufacturing. You can display these using Transaction MF47 and/or Transaction COGI. So schedule a job for program RMSERI11 on daily basis or hourly basis so it will clear the postprocessing errors.
But for some of the errors, it needs manual intervention like updating storage location, posting dates due to posting period block etc.
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

SM:SELFDIAGNOSIS background job getting failed in Solution manager

Hi All,
SM:SELFDIAGNOSIS background job getting failed in Solution manger server :
Job Log:
2-22-2012 16:44:02 Job started                                                                                00           516          S
2-22-2012 16:44:02 Step 001 started (program RDSWP_SELF_DIAGNOSIS, variant &0000000000324, user ID BASISUSER)      00           550          S
2-22-2012 16:45:07 Internal session terminated with a runtime error (see ST22)                                     00           671          A
2-22-2012 16:45:07 Job cancelled                                                                                00           518          A
ST22: Dump:
Runtime Errors         ITAB_DUPLICATE_KEY
Date and Time          02-22-2012 16:45:07
Short text
A row with the same key already exists.
What happened?
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "CL_DSWP_SD_DIAGNOSE_CONSISTENTCP" had to be
terminated because it has
come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
What can you do?
Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
administrator.
Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
at and manage termination messages, and you can also
keep them for a long time.
Error analysis
An entry was to be entered into the table
"\CLASS=CL_DSWP_SD_DIAGNOSE_CONSISTENT\METHOD=CHECK_USERS_BP\DATA=LT_USCP"
(which should have
had a unique table key (UNIQUE KEY)).
However, there already existed a line with an identical key.
The insert-operation could have ocurred as a result of an INSERT- or
MOVE command, or in conjunction with a SELECT ... INTO.
The statement "INSERT INITIAL LINE ..." cannot be used to insert several
initial lines into a table with a unique key.
How to correct the error
Probably the only way to eliminate the error is to correct the program.
If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
keywords:
"ITAB_DUPLICATE_KEY" " "
"CL_DSWP_SD_DIAGNOSE_CONSISTENTCP" or "CL_DSWP_SD_DIAGNOSE_CONSISTENTCM00M"
"CHECK_USERS_BP"
If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
notification to SAP, include the following information:
1. The description of the current problem (short dump)
To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File
(Unconverted)".
2. Corresponding system log
Display the system log by calling transaction SM21.
Restrict the time interval to 10 minutes before and five minutes
after the short dump. Then choose "System->List->Save->Local File
(Unconverted)".
3. If the problem occurs in a problem of your own or a modified SAP
program: The source code of the program
In the editor, choose "Utilities->More
Utilities->Upload/Download->Download".
4. Details about the conditions under which the error occurred or which
actions and input led to the error.
KIndly Suggest to resolve the above issue
Thanks
Nekkalapu

HI,
Deatils:
SAP EHP 1 for SAP Solution Manager 7.0
SAP_ABA                701          0006    SAPKA70106
SAP_BASIS              701          0006    SAPKB70106
PI_BASIS               701          0006    SAPK-70106INPIBASI
ST-PI                  2008_1_700   0002    SAPKITLRD2
CRMUIF                 500          0004    SAPK-50004INCRMUIF
SAP_BW                 701          0006    SAPKW70106
SAP_AP                 700          0019    SAPKNA7019
BBPCRM                 500          0016    SAPKU50016
BI_CONT                704          0007    SAPK-70407INBICONT
CPRXRPM                400          0016    SAPK-40016INCPRXRP
ST                     400          0024    SAPKITL434
ST-A/PI                01M_CRM570   0000         -
ST-ICO                 150_700      0009    SAPK-15079INSTPL
ST-SER                 701_2010_1   0002    SAPKITLOS2
Thanks
Nekkalapu

Two consignment vendors during stock determination

Hi all.
Under customizing related to stock determination I included to have prirority own stock over consignment (for both MM and WM).
My question is how is the stock determination performed in consigment when there is stock of two different vendors for the same part?
I read in Help-SAP that stock determination is applied first in MM and then the system forwards this data to WM (WM stock determination int his case is not possible). There is no sort for prices, nor quantity.
In my particular case, I have two steps for production process (REM); in this case no own stocks exists but consingment for two vendors:
1. In MF60 (movment 319) TRs are created (and then TOs) to move materials into 100 storage type. When 2 different vendors are managed I thought that the system would transfer the older quant but when both stocks are in the same storage bin with the same GR date I don´t understand exactly the stock determination made.
2. MFBF is performed to consume all components (movement 261K); here stock determination is executed again first in MM but I don´t know exactly how the system chooses the vendor
Could it be the criteria different in the first step rather than the second one, so I move physically stock from one vendor but informatically consumed the other one? is there a way to avoid this?
Any clarification will be wellcomed!!!

1) Please read OSS note 365570.
For instance:
- WM dominates
Warehouse Management System WMS picks the necessary quantities independently of the stock category of the materials and only takes the picking strategy into account that is defined in the WMS here (for example, FIFO).
2)
In the stock determination header table you define the priorities of:
- item table (V_T434K-RAPOS)
- price (V_T434K-RAVAL)
- quantity (V_T434K-RAQUA)
Based on these priorities the system will determine a number for each relevant stock item and then sort the internal table (check include: LMDBFFS0).
Additionally you can use user exit EXIT_SAPLMDBF_002 (XMBF0001) to influence the sort sequence.
So, the vendor id itself has no importence in standrard system from stock determination point of view.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 10, 2011 2:44 PM

Automatic Batch Determination for Subcontracting Process(ME2ON)

Dear All,
When we are issuing the components to subcontracting vendor in ME2ON t-code, system is not picking the batch automatically like while creating delivery. In Sales for automatic batch determination they are using item category group but for subcon. order we have only delivery type.
Is SAP will support automatic Batch determination while issue the goods through ME2ON?
If yes kindly revert back.
Thanks &Regards,
Edited by: Priya on Nov 7, 2011 11:40 AM

Hi,
Go to SPRO > Logistics - General > Batch Management > Batch Determination and Batch Check > Batch Search Procedure Allocation and Check Activation > Allocate IM Search Procedure/Activate Check > Here assign Batch Search Procedure "ME0001" to Movement Type 543 O
Then go to MBC1 and maintain condition record for Strategy Type ME02 i.e. Plant and here keep selection method as "O"
In MIGO, click on "Stock Determination" button for automatic batch determination.

Agent determination failed in Standard Workflow.

Hi Experts,
I am new to workflow and we are trying to implement the standard HCM process of Transfer.
The worflow is giving this error.
Error when processing node "000000032"
which further says Agent determination failed for step "000000032"
Pls help and guide what can be done to resolve it.
We have checked the Org Structure.
Regards,
SV

Hi,
Thank you for your reply,
Which std workflow you are using ?
We are using the WF WS17900427.
Are you using portal to trigger the workflow and webdynpro screen for approval or adobe form for approval ?
Yes
If the agend resolution is getting failed. What role number ?
Rule ID 17900012.
Have your tested individually from PFAC t-code. Is it giving the correct agent from there. check from there.
Testing individually (onclick of Stimulate rule resolution).
Runtime Error MOVE_CAST_ERROR
Exception CX_SY_MOVE_CAST_ERROR
Regards,
Sanjyoti.

SQL Loader fails to process string columns with more than 255 characters

Hi all,
I am using LKM file to sqlldr(oracle) to load data from flat file to oracle. I am aware of the fact that if you don't specify length of the input character data, sqlldr uses default of 255 characters. But, in my source datastore I have specified the column length to be 1000, but sqlldr still fails to process records with more that 255 characters.
Any idea how to change this behavior of sqlldr?
Appreciate your response.
Akshata

You can change the step "Generate CTL File"
and replace the section:
          } else {
          // The source column is a STRING => no options to add
               format = "";
          };with
          } else {
          // The source column is a STRING => add char(length) for length greater than 255
               taille = new Integer(colPrecision).intValue();
               if (taille > 254)
               format = "CHAR("+colPrecision+")";
               else
               format ="";
          };

Stock determination, Stock on hand "E"and vendor stock

Hello all,
I would like to know the process of stock determination and how it works. is the stock determination active only for special stocks.
how are the consignment and special stock - "E" - stock on hand created in SAP.
Thanks,
Maxx

Hi
Consignment stock is special stock 'K' and this means that you do not own it and it is not valued until you remove the 'K and then you will have a requirement to pay for it. This needs to be done in agreement with a vendor so that they will allow you to pay only when you use it and you will need the vendoe setting up as a consignment vendor and when you create the PO you create it for special stock 'K'.
Special stock 'E' is Sales order stock which means that the stock is allocate to a specific sales order and can only go to that sales order and if you try to pick it for anything else you should get an error.
I hope that this helps
Frenchy

Stock determination for sales order stock

Hi all,
for our SAP retail solution - we have requirements for moving Consignment stock to Sales order stock for home delivery . Then Sales order stock needs to be withdrawn for inter company 643 movement . The stock determination is maintained as K first & then F with relevent settings in SPRO & article master, for consignment article -when sales order stock exist & delivery is created for intercompany PO with sales order on account assignment to transfer stock from Store to DC, SAP error message is not allowing to post Goods issue.
What settings do we need to maintain for this to happen to withdraw from Sales order stock for consignment article ? Any help or information is highly appreciable.
Thanks
Krish

This is the error message :-
After calling stock determination, a quantity of 1.000 EA remains open
Message no. WRF_CONS013
Diagnosis
During consignment processing in SAP Retail, the system called stock determination in order to decide which stock category should be used to take material 000000001000009740. However, the stock determination routine did not find enough stock in the relevant stock categories (as defined in the strategy). A quantity of 1.000 EA remains open.
Please note that stock determination ignores the Negative Stocks Allowed setting.
Procedure
Check your stocks and settings for stock determination for material 000000001000009740 in plant 3001. Post stock transfers if necessary

404 Application Not Found:Failed to process the request

Hello
We are facing below dump issue on our SAP Netweaver CE EHP1 as Java system (DEV System). But its not coming frequently.
when refresh the url then loging screen coming again.
OS - Windows Server 2008 R2
Database - MS SQL Server 2008
404 Application Not Found SAP NetWeaver Application Server/Java AS
Failed to process the request: Request refers to an unknown session
Correction Hints
The request refers to a session that doesn't exist. Reasons might be one of the following: a) Wrong URL is used to request the application (i.e. there might be a typo in the URL). b) Request with wrong parameters is sent by the client (might also indicate an unfriendly attack). c) Request belongs to a session that expired already some time ago and is no longer traced on the server. If the problem persists, record the HTTP traffic to analyse the causing requests.
Note: The above hints are only a guess. They are automatically derived from the exception that occurred and therefore can't be guaranteed to address the original problem in all cases.

Hello Asish,
Could you please check the follwing link if it is helpful!!
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/JSTSG/%28JSTSG%29%28Web%29Problems-P203
The requested resource does not exist

SDO gives JBO-26030: Failed to lock the record, another user holds the lock

Hi,
I have a question thats on the boundary between ADF and BPEL but I posted in this forum because its highly related to ADF Model with Service Interface.
We have a BPEL batch process that spawns multiple child BPEL processes that handle threads inside the batch in parallel. These child processes all update the same batch record in a database with for example the lastActionDateTime. We do this by invoking an update service on a SDO application that we built following this tutorial: http://jianmingli.com/wp/?p=2838
It all works good but sometimes when updating the same row from multiple BPEL process instances at the same time, we sometimes get a SDO JBO-26030: Failed to lock the record, another user holds the lock.
I'm a bit stunned by this, because all we really do is updating a record. From BPEL we just invoke the updateBatch webservice method of the Service Interface.
I can imagine that there will be wait time when these updates come in at the same time, but I didn't expect an exception would occur. Also the arbitrariness confuses me. If a child process would lock the record, I would expect this error to happen always and not at random.
From BPEL the error displays as follows:
     <fault>
          <bpelFault>
               <faultType>1</faultType>
               <ServiceException>
                    <part name="ServiceErrorMessage">
                         <tns:ServiceErrorMessage>
                              <tns:code>26030</tns:code>
                              <tns:message>JBO-26030: Failed to lock the record, another user holds the lock.</tns:message>
                              <tns:severity>SEVERITY_ERROR</tns:severity>
                              <tns:exceptionClassName>oracle.jbo.AlreadyLockedException</tns:exceptionClassName>
                         </tns:ServiceErrorMessage>
                    </part>
               </ServiceException>
          </bpelFault>
     </fault>However when I dive into soa_server1-diagnostic.log I see the following exception:
[2011-10-28T17:37:37.770+02:00] [soa_server1] [ERROR] [] [oracle.jbo.server.svc.ServiceJTATxnHandlerImpl] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '8' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: a1484c49db38e963:-581f01fc:13345d7173d:-8000-00000000000322f4,0:1:0x5f5e2bf:33] [WEBSERVICE_PORT.name: ECMControllerSDOServiceSoapHttpPort] [APP: ECMControllerSDO] [composite_name: ECMProcessController] [component_name: ProcessControllerBPEL] [component_instance_id: 240335] [J2EE_MODULE.name: ECMControllerSDO] [WEBSERVICE.name: ECMControllerSDOService] [J2EE_APP.name: ECMControllerSDO] [[
oracle.jbo.RowInconsistentException: JBO-25014: Another user has changed the row with primary key oracle.jbo.Key[CDS_20111028_8 ].
     at oracle.jbo.server.OracleSQLBuilderImpl.doEntitySelectForAltKey(OracleSQLBuilderImpl.java:1077)
     at oracle.jbo.server.BaseSQLBuilderImpl.doEntitySelect(BaseSQLBuilderImpl.java:553)
     at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.doSelect(EntityImpl.java:8134)
     at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.lock(EntityImpl.java:5863)
     at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.beforePost(EntityImpl.java:6369)
     at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.postChanges(EntityImpl.java:6551)
     at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.doPostTransactionListeners(DBTransactionImpl.java:3275)
     at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.postChanges(DBTransactionImpl.java:3078)
     at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.commitInternal(DBTransactionImpl.java:2088)
     at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.commit(DBTransactionImpl.java:2369)
     at oracle.jbo.server.DefaultJTATxnHandlerImpl.commit(DefaultJTATxnHandlerImpl.java:156)
     at oracle.jbo.server.svc.ServiceJTATxnHandlerImpl.commit(ServiceJTATxnHandlerImpl.java:216)
     at oracle.jbo.server.svc.ServiceJTATxnHandlerImpl.beforeCompletion(ServiceJTATxnHandlerImpl.java:124)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2677.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at oracle.jbo.server.svc.WLSContextCrossAppProxy$WLSCrossAppProxy.invoke(WLSContextCrossAppProxy.java:66)
     at $Proxy377.beforeCompletion(Unknown Source)
     at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.doBeforeCompletion(ServerSCInfo.java:1239)
     at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.callBeforeCompletions(ServerSCInfo.java:1214)
     at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.startPrePrepareAndChain(ServerSCInfo.java:116)
     at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.localPrePrepareAndChain(ServerTransactionImpl.java:1316)
     at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.globalPrePrepare(ServerTransactionImpl.java:2132)
     at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.internalCommit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:272)
     at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:239)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.BaseRemoteObject.postInvoke1(BaseRemoteObject.java:625)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.StatelessRemoteObject.postInvoke1(StatelessRemoteObject.java:49)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.BaseRemoteObject.__WL_postInvokeTxRetry(BaseRemoteObject.java:444)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:53)
     at nl.kpn.ecm4crm.am.server.serviceinterface.ECMControllerSDOServiceImpl_51vl7y_ECMControllerSDOServiceImpl.updateBatches(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.invoke(RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.java:85)
     at $Proxy373.updateBatches(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.jaxws.ServiceEndpointRuntime.processMessage(ServiceEndpointRuntime.java:355)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.jaxws.ServiceEndpointRuntime.processMessage(ServiceEndpointRuntime.java:196)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.jaxws.JAXWSRuntimeDelegate.processMessage(JAXWSRuntimeDelegate.java:479)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.provider.ProviderProcessor.doEndpointProcessing(ProviderProcessor.java:1187)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.WebServiceProcessor.invokeEndpointImplementation(WebServiceProcessor.java:1081)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.provider.ProviderProcessor.doRequestProcessing(ProviderProcessor.java:581)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.WebServiceProcessor.processRequest(WebServiceProcessor.java:232)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.WebServiceProcessor.doService(WebServiceProcessor.java:192)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.WebServiceServlet.doPost(WebServiceServlet.java:459)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:26)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
     at oracle.jbo.server.svc.ServiceContextFilter.doFilter(ServiceContextFilter.java:78)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
     at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter$1.run(JpsAbsFilter.java:111)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     at oracle.security.jps.util.JpsSubject.doAsPrivileged(JpsSubject.java:313)
     at oracle.security.jps.ee.util.JpsPlatformUtil.runJaasMode(JpsPlatformUtil.java:413)
     at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.runJaasMode(JpsAbsFilter.java:94)
     at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.doFilter(JpsAbsFilter.java:161)
     at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsFilter.doFilter(JpsFilter.java:71)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
     at oracle.dms.servlet.DMSServletFilter.doFilter(DMSServletFilter.java:136)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(WebAppServletContext.java:3715)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3681)
     at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
     at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2277)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2183)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1454)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:207)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:176)Thank you for reading, any directions suggestions on how to solve this will be highly appreciated.
regards,
Gerben

Thanks Frank.
Already tried that , please let me know if there is any other way to get this .
This is being discussed here :
Re: Update without No wait
and i am following what John Stegeman has suggested.

Background stock determination fails to process Cogi records

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for