Backup vault always smaller than the library...?

My backup vault is alvays about 1 GB smaller than the original Aperture Library. How come? Is this right?

Thanks Now I can sleep well again.

Similar Messages

  • VAULT size is smaller than the LIBRARY

    my vault size is smaller than the aperture library.  is it saving everything?  it seems like the two should be the same size or at least close to the same size.  i regularly update my vault so that it is current with the library.  VAULT = 168 GB | LIBRARY = 262 GB

    what is the consequence if i totally turn previews off?
    The major consequence is that you will not be able to share images from your library through the media browser. So if you want to email an image for example or add an image to a document you will need to export the image first rather then be able to get the preview from the library.
    Also if you have referenced originals and the originals go off-line nothing will appear in the library. If you had previews for those images you would still see them and be able to do tasks like rate them.
    Finally some operations might appear slower as you won;t see anything on the scree until the image you are looking at is rendered. With previews while Aperture is rendering the image in the background it will display the preview.
    It is possible to selectively maintain previews for some projects and not for others. This might be a comprise position between having previews for al images and having no previews at all.

  • Is the website always smaller than the screen?

    New to Mac...very frustrating to learn about it without help. Lots of things bug me...first being...why are the websites (window) smaller than the whole screen? Can this be changed?

    The green button in the "traffic lights" (top left corner of window) will toggle between max size and whatever size you have set it to by dragging the bottom right corner.
    Mac 101 is a good place for a beginner - and of course you will get great support in these forums.

  • How can I Copy/backup photos in iphoto to external drives smaller than iPhoto library

    How can I Copy/backup photos in iphoto to external drives smaller than iPhoto library?  I have several 128 GB SSD's that I want to use to copy/backup all my iPhoto photographs for a permanent archive due to stability...but my iPhoto library is larger than the drives (about 234 GB) so it would require two of the SSD's...how best to get the original photos onto the SSD's?  I'm running Yosemite and iPhoto 9.6...thx.

    Terrence - Can you explain what you mean by data loss?  In the iPhoto Library?  Or on the copy? 
    Larry - In what way is each photo "degraded"?  Quality?  Isn't it simply making an an exact copy, in this case a jpeg, as would happen if I dragged and dropped a different file type?  Is there another type of degradation? 
    I am working on trying to create a correct backup as well (per your instructions) but I wanted to use this as a "put in a fireproof safe" archive on very small SSD's that would never have a mechanical hard drive problem (we've lost a couple over time so aren't real confident in their staying power)...I also recognize that I I won't have newer photos in this archive group but at least it would have 98% of our photos in another off-site location...at least that's the thought...
    Thx for your input and look forward to more in your reply...

  • Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click w

    Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
    Thanks.

    Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
    Thanks.

  • Copied folder smaller than the original one

    Hi, when I copy my folder of Logic song material (size approx. 4,55 GB, located on the desk) to an external Harddisk (WD ´my book´, I guess Fat32, brandnew and not formatted under OS X) or via my inhouse network (on a windows PC with NTFS), the copied folder is smaller than the original one - approx. 4,2 or 4,3 GB then.
    Is that normal or are files lost during the copying? I need help with this urgently, because I have to do the backup.
    My system: PowerMac G5 Dual, 2,5 GHz, 3 GB RAM, Tiger (newest version), nothing special.
    Thank you für your help,
    PE

    Philip
    Is that normal or are files lost during the copying? I need help with this urgently, because I have to do the backup.Copying can certainly reduce the space taken, because fragmentation is reduced.
    If you want a one off count of your folder, you can do this:
    Open the Terminal (from /Applications/Utilities) and type
    cdNow type a space, and then drag the folder you are interested in to the Terminal window. It will fill in the path automatically, so you will see something like
    cd /Users/jdoe/Documentsfor example. Now type a return, and then copy and paste the following, as one line, into the Terminal window:
    <pre>echo "`find . -type f \! -name ".*" | wc -l` files and `find . -type d | wc -l` folders"</pre>Now press return, and wait!
    As an indication, for my Home folder it takes about 35 seconds on a 600MHz iBook (slow drives in these laptops) to tell me I have 16631 files and 3920 folders. The command does not count dotfiles, such as ".DS_Store", deliberately, so there may be small discrepancies.

  • The speaker of my brand new mac book pro are not working and I cannot plug in the earphones, the hole looks smaller than the pin or with an obstruction. anybody can help? thanks

    the speakers of my brand new mac book pro are not working and I cannot plug in the earphones, the hole looks smaller than the pin or with an obstruction. anybody can help? thanks

    Hi talero,
    Contact AppleCare or bring it into an Apple Store or AASP.

  • Why is the version file smaller than the original file, although I didn't make changes in the file? And why is the keywords don't exporting with original files?

    Hi! Why is the version file smaller than the original file, although I didn't make changes in the file? And why is the keywords don't exporting with original files?

    Wild guess: you're using the the wrong export settings. You'll need to tell us more before we can help you - like the export settings you're usng, the size and format of the originals etc.

  • Thumbnails in the browser 3.3 is smaller than the previous version

    thumbnails in the browser 3.3 is smaller than the previous version.

    I did this, the difference is very small. for some reason the size of thumbnails was limited in the browser. in split view window if you increase the thumbs are larger. I'll try to photograph the screen to show the difference. excuse my google translator

  • Why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?

    hi, all . why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?

    Lonion wrote:
    hi, all . why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?Both are different.
    Flash logs size depends on parameter DB_FLASHBACK_RETENTION_TARGET , how much you want to keep.
    Archive log files is dumped file of Online redo log files, It can be either size of Online redo log file size or less depending on online redo size when switch occurred.
    Some more information:-
    Flashback log files can be created only under the Flash Recovery Area (that must be configured before enabling the Flashback Database functionality). RVWR creates flashback log files into a directory named “FLASHBACK” under FRA. The size of every generated flashback log file is again under Oracle’s control. According to current Oracle environment – during normal database activity flashback log files have size of 8200192 bytes. It is very close value to the current redo log buffer size. The size of a generated flashback log file can differs during shutdown and startup database activities. Flashback log file sizes can differ during high intensive write activity as well.
    Source:- http://dba-blog.blogspot.in/2006/05/flashback-database-feature.html
    Edited by: CKPT on Jun 14, 2012 7:34 PM

  • ORA-13044: the specified tile size is smaller than the tolerance

    Hi,
    I get the oracle error ORA-13044: the specified tile size is smaller than the tolerance when I do the following point cloud clip:
    8 sdo_geometry(2003,29903, null,
    9 mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1,1003,3),
    10 mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(316504,316510,234084,234090)),
    However the bounds of my point cloud are
    316500 to 316511 and 234080 to 234092 and my tolerance during point cloud creation is set to 0.000015 (I have alterated this value before to make it smaller but nothing seems fit).
    Where do I set the "tile size"?
    The set consists of 100 points and blk_capacity is set to 50.
    Any help is really greatly appreciated.
    Cheers,
    F.

    Hi BKazar,
    thanks for responding.
    Yes, I tried out all sorts of things and swapped the numbers to see if that would fix the issue. It did not.
    I have found out now though what the issue was. When I loaded the data file into Oracle, the guy who gave me the file said that the first column is the longitude, but it wasn't. After switching sdo_point.x and y the error disappeard.
    I suppose the sdo_srid was expecting a different range and got confused because my long and lat were swapped.
    Cheers,
    F.

  • Error Code - client cache is smaller than the size of the requested content

    Even though we have increased the size of the ccmcache via Control Panel > Configuration Manager, we still get the Error Code 0x87D01202 (-2016407038) "the content
    download cannot be performed because the total size of the client cache is smaller than the size of the requested content"  The CCMEXEC Service and computer have both been restarted, after increasing the ccmcache size.  Which local log
    file under C:\Windows\CCM\Logs should we check for more information ?
    Thanks

    so when you re deploying the client go into your settings and set the variable below:
    smscachesize=10240
    note:
    SMSCACHESIZE
    Specifies the size of the client cache folder in megabyte (MB) or as a percentage when used with the PERCENTDISKSPACE or PERCENTFREEDISKSPACE property. If this property is not set, the folder defaults to a maximum size of 5120 MB. The lowest value that you
    can specify is 1 MB.
    Note
    If a new package that must be downloaded would cause the folder to exceed the maximum size, and if the folder cannot be purged to make sufficient space available, the package download fails, and the program or application will not run.
    This setting is ignored when you upgrade an existing client and when the client downloads software updates.
    Example: CCMSetup.exe SMSCACHESIZE=100
    Note
    If you reinstall a client, you cannot use the SMSCACHESIZE or SMSCACHEFLAGS installation properties to set the cache size to be smaller than it was previously. If you try to do this, your value is ignored and the cache size is automatically set to the last
    size it was previously.
    For example, if you install the client with the default cache size of 5120 MB, and then reinstall the client with a cache size of 100 MB, the cache folder size on the reinstalled client is set to 5120 MB.
    Twitter: @dguilloryjr LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dannyjr Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/#!/dguilloryjr

  • Why Is My Snapshot Smaller Than The Webcam?

    I am trying to make a snapshot of the users webcam, but the snapshot is 1/4 the size of the running webcam and doesn't fill the bitmap data section. Also is there a better way I can Add and position the snapshot.?
    import flash.display.BitmapData;
    import flash.display.DisplayObject;
    var bandwidth:int = 0; // Specifies the maximum amount of bandwidth that the current outgoing video feed can use, in bytes per second. To specify that Flash Player video can use as much bandwidth as needed to maintain the value of quality , pass 0 for bandwidth . The default value is 16384.
    var quality:int = 100; // this value is 0-100 with 1 being the lowest quality. Pass 0 if you want the quality to vary to keep better framerates
    var cam:Camera = Camera.getCamera();
    cam.setQuality(bandwidth, quality);
    cam.setMode(320,240,30,false); // setMode(videoWidth, videoHeight, video fps, favor area)
    video_vobj.attachCamera(cam);
    stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, takephoto);
    var screenS:BitmapData = new BitmapData(320, 240, true, 0xCCCCCCCC);
    var screenS_image:Bitmap=new Bitmap(screenS);
    function takephoto(e:MouseEvent):void
    screenS.draw(video_vobj) ;
    addChild(screenS_image) ;
    screenS_image.x = 360;
    screenS_image.y = 20;

    OK…I purchased and downloaded Elements 9.0 for my MACs ( I have two in two different locations).  I installed on both and the brushes work as expected on one of them but not the other.  Guess that is why I asked about a reinstall….possibly something went wrong on this computer when installed.
    I am just trying to create an image for a background paper and have selected a brush.  I resize it with the bracket key (and have also tried resizing with the slider on the menu up top).  I hover the brush over the area I want to place it and then click.  The brush is smaller than the hover image every time.   Makes it hard to know where to lace my brush for proper placement.  As far as the percentage…..that actually is a guesstimate, but it isn't 50% smaller that's for sure.
    Eileen

  • Why is my "Combined PDF" file size smaller than the original files?

    Hello!
    I am trying to combine two individual PDF files into a single PDF. Each file is 32mb, however when I use acrobat to combine them, the newly created "combined" file is only 19mb. I believe I've taken the necessary steps to ensure no degradation is happening (i.e. selecting Large File Size in the options panel), but I am still puzzled as to how two files can be put together as one and be smaller than the two separate files with out any compression. What am I missing?
    Thanks in advance!

    When you combine a file it does a "Save As" operation.  This re-writes all of the PDF object in the single file and is supposed to clean up the file, whereas the single files may have had multiple saves which when you look at the internals of the PDF file simply add on to the end of the file.  In other words you get a more cleanly written and optimized file that is also saved for Fast Web View.

  • Can Adobe Collage be used for images smaller than the standard 1200 by 789?

    Can Adobe Collage be used for images smaller than the standard 1200 by 789?

    Hi,
    * Photoshop Touch does have very good text capabilites.
    * For opening the Collage as an Artwork (Merged layer) in Photoshop Touch, you just need to upload the Collage file to Creative cloud and import it directly into Photoshop Touch.
    But if you are looking to preserve all the layers of the Collage file, you should download the Collage file as PSD from Creative Clould and import it in Photoshop Touch as layers.
    * Collage does have canvas scalability, you can extend up the canvas on all the four directions. But i think in you case you are looking for having specific custom sizes of the canvas, which is not currently available in Collage. Currently you cannot shrink the canvas below the default canvas size.
    Hope this is helpful. Please do revert back if you have more queries.
    -Subbi

Maybe you are looking for