Backward compatibility problem...acrobat 8.0 vs reader 6.0

Not sure if this is the right forum, but will start here & move if necessary.
We have been using Acrobat 8.0 for 2-3 years & have never had a problem 'til now.  We will be creating a series of documents 1-10 pages long, with sound clips in them & anticipate that some of the systems viewing the documents may be as dated as W98, so we set the PDF configuration to be backward compatible to reader 6.0.
Earlier today I downloaded a copy of reader 6.0, just to make sure all worked...it didn't.  Instead, I get "this file appears to use a new format that this version of acrobat does not support."
The document I used to test was, again, creadted w/acrobat 8.0, set for backward compatibility to reader 6.0.  The document was 4 pages long with 4 color photographs & 2 .mp3 sound clips embedded.
Anybody have any ideas where the problem is?  The test file reads OK on current version readers, so does Acrobat 8.0 not really generate backward compatible documents?

Follow Bernd's suggestion. You probably added something to the file after creation (like the sound clips) and the method you used is not AA6 compatible. Saving the file (or save as) does not preserve the version compatibility, but changes it to AA8. To maintain backward compatibile versions, you have to be sure you do not add AA8 only features and use Reduce File Size or PDF Optimize to save the file as an AA6 compatibile file.
Typically AA6 will open an AA8 file, but will ignore any new feature. You may have added something it can not handle. I don't recall if AA6 could handle embedded mp3 files.

Similar Messages

  • Does OSX do "backward compatibility to Acrobat Reader version 6"?

    I need to prepare a PDF file from my Pages document, and it required to provide "backward compatibility to Acrobat Reader version 6." Apparently this is something Acrobat Distiller can do but I don't have that app. How can I get Pages to make such a PDF file, or how can I convert the one Pages makes to that format? (I looked at ColorSync Utility but didn't see anything relevant among its PDF filters.)
    Quick advice would be very much appreciated!

    PeterBreis0807 wrote:
    is rendered down to only 72dpi.
    Peter
    Which can be worked around. [PDF/X Problems in Leopard|http://pagesfaq.blogspot.com/2009/01/pdfx-problems-in-leopard.html]
    You have to use cmd + P when creating PDF files from Pages with this new option.
    Message was edited by: fruhulda

  • Forms compatibility between Acrobat Pro 8 and Reader 9

    Hi everyone. I have a problem to resolve as quick as I can. I haven't find any answers yet, maybe someone will know what's going on with my forms.
    I'm working on a document made by another graphic designer, I can't reach this person. When I use his forms, it works in Acrobat Pro 8 and Reader 9, users can fill out forms and save a copy. BUT, I have to made a modification in the forms. I use the Touch Up tools in Acrobat Pro 8, made a copy, but this copy have a problem: users cannot fill forms and save a copy in Reader 9. They can only print the form and fill it by hand. I can't find any options to made my forms compatible with Reader 9 when I save the copy.
    Do you have any idea why the original forms of the guy works but not mine?? My client is a bit mad
    Thank you!
    Karine

    I am having a similar issue where I created a form and when I sent it to my team members (who only have reader) they are not able to fill in the form.  It is like a document for them.  I  have done the "extended rights" several times in trying to figure out what is going on and it is still not working.  Do you have any thoughts of what else I might try?  I am very new to this all and very confused and frustrated right now.
    Thanks!
    Mary

  • FORMS60 back to FORMS50 backward compatibility problems.

    I've got an application that was developed (not implemented) using Forms60/Reports60 but now have a need to move it back to a Forms50/Reports30 environment. Currently, I can't save the .frm files from version 6.0 to version 5.0. Anyone figured a way around this? Also, any issues with the reports from version 6.0 back to 3.0?

    Thanks for pointing me in this direction Srini.<br>
              I tried to deploy the sample BlackBoxNoTx connector to WL 9.1 and it worked for me too. This got me wondering what was different in my connector. And then I realized it was the permission settings in my ra.xml :- <br><br>
              <security-permission><br>
              <description>Granting all permissions</description><br>
              <security-permission-spec><br>
              Â grant{permission java.security.AllPermission;};<br>
              </security-permission-spec><br>
              </security-permission><br>
              <br><br>
              Once I removed this from my descriptor, my connector deployed OK.
              <br><br>
              To be absolutely sure, I added the permission setting to the sample BlackBoxNoTx connector, regenerated the RAR, and redeployed it, upon which it failed with the exception that prompted me to start this thread in the first place.
              <br><br>
              Unfortunately, I cannot do away with the permission setting for my connector.
              <br><br>
              I am now more certain than ever that WL 9.1's backward compatibility with JCA 1.0 is suspect.
              <br>Anyone from BEA listening ????
              <br><br>
              Is there a way I can file this for BEA to fix?

  • Backward Compatibility of Acrobat 9 Pro and Pro Extended

    if I make a pdf with a swf or mov. file in Acrobat Pro Extended, can someone with Acrobat 6 or 7 see those features when they open it up?
    Where is there a chart for these version differences on the website. I could not find it readily.

    It depends. How are you inserting the mov/swf file in Acrobat 9?
    Once you click the insert video/flash button in Acrobat Pro Extended, you'll see a dialog with lot of text (read it :-)). Essentially, by default the .mov would be converted to flash video and embedded in PDF file. This would be viewable only in Acrobat/Reader 9 and users on a lower version will get a message to update their program. On the plus side, the video would be played natively by Acrobat/Reader 9 and users would not need any player like Quicktime installed to view the video.
    On the same dialog, there is an option (link) to "create legacy multimedia content". If you choose that option you can create files with video that can be viewed using Reader 5/6 but would require user's machine to have a native video player installed.

  • Xalan backward compatibility problem

    I am migrating my application from Jrun to JBoss.
    And I am getting the following problem.
    java.lang.VerifyError: (class: org/apache/xalan/xpath/xdom/XercesLiaison, method: parse signature: (Lorg/xml/sax/InputSource;)V) Incompatible object argument for function call
         java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
         java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:141)
         org.apache.xalan.xslt.XSLTEngineImpl.<init>(XSLTEngineImpl.java:360)
         org.apache.xalan.xslt.XSLTProcessorFactory.getProcessor(XSLTProcessorFactory.java:79)
         resins.ivtrack.xml.DocumentManager.initXSLProcessor(DocumentManager.java:339)
         resins.ivtrack.xml.DocumentManager.transform(DocumentManager.java:617)
         resins.ivtrack.servlet.FormServlet.requestForm(FormServlet.java:521)
         resins.ivtrack.servlet.FormServlet.processRequest(FormServlet.java:187)
         resins.ivtrack.servlet.FormServlet.doGet(FormServlet.java:793)
         javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:697)
         javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:810)
         org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilter.java:75)
    The piece of code from where the error is coming out is
    xslprocessor = org.apache.xalan.xslt.XSLTProcessorFactory.getProcessor();
    As per my understanding there is a version minmatch problem.
    The application is running fine in JRun which is using jdk1.1.3.
    But when I run the same code in JBoss, I am getting the above problem. Jdk1.4.2 is installed on the JBoss server.
    Please help
    Thanks,
    Mehul

    Check out this thread:
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=492221&messageID=3017648
    /Per

  • Workaround for lack of backward compatibility?

    Is there any workaround for the new iOS7 Pages' lack of backward compatibility?  I am still running Pages '09 on my MacBook Pro and won't upgrade to Mavericks until it's reached version 9.02 or so.  The new Pages tells me that any doc I open will no longer be compatible with any version of Pages except the newest one.  I also see in reviews of the new Mavericks Pages that some people are losing formatting etc of their old Pages docs in the new version because of this backward compatibility problem, and that makes me even less inclined to upgrade given how many Pages docs I have that May be unreadable in the new version.
    Any suggestions accepted.  Thanks.

    I solved my own problem.  I'm posting how in the hope it'll benefit others.  This will only work after you have synced your iPad to iTunes on your computer.
    First, I recovered the old version of Pages from my laptop's trash. 
    Second, I made a copy of the old version, went into user/music/iTunes/Mobile Applications and removed the new version of Pages and pasted in the copy of the old version.
    Third, I opened iTunes and clicked on "Apps" in the "Library" section of the Sidebar.  I then dragged and dropped the old verison of Pages onto the Apps screen in iTunes.  iTunes asked me if I wanted to replace a newer version with an older one and I clicked on "yes."
    Fourth, I deleted the new version of Pages from my iPad.
    And fifth, I synced the iPad with iTunes, which copied the old verison of Pages onto the iPad.
    I have a feeling that step 2 is redundant, but I've done that kind of thing before and it has seemed to work.

  • Backward compatibility of MS Flash object in Windows 8

    I have a case opened with Microsoft from Pfizer, Inc and need a case open with Adobe so that the MS engineers can communicate with Adobe within non-disclosure constraints.
    What MS needs from Adobe are debugging information the don't have in order to resolve the issue in their Win8 Flash object (15x).  MS will need to share with Adobe details and data that belong to Pfizer hence need to open that channel for those purposes and for MS to request technical information from Adobe.
    My MS case number is 114111712050982 so that you have that information and can share email addresses and phone numbers privately with Flash technical support.
    I have picked the best fit I could find for a community

    As a general rule, we'd highly recommend that everyone move from fscommand to ExternalInterface.  It's a superior replacement and eliminates some of the weird quirks that fscommand has.  In your situation, changes to IE11 caused backwards compatibility problems with fscommand, but ExternalInterface is unaffected.  We have some work in the pipeline to address the issue on IE11, but it has the potential to break existing content on configs that currently work, so we're trying to be really methodical about providing public pre-releases and soliciting feedback.  In 2014, the only high-traffic content that really uses fscommand are old enterprise applications, so it's hard for us to collect feedback or gauge the impact directly by looking at popular sites.
    We just handed a build off with the proposed fscommand changes to Microsoft for inclusion in the next Windows 10 technical preview.  We were soliciting feedback on any related fallout for Windows 7 users on our beta channel (http://www.adobe.com/go/flashplayerbeta); however, there's not a good way to provide a beta build for Windows 8 since Flash Player is a built-in component of IE.  We're working with Microsoft to establish a beta program for Flash Player in IE on Win8+.  If you have access to the Win10 Technical Preview builds, we'd encourage you to test any of your legacy systems that require Flash and give us feedback once the next update is available.
    The fact that introducing a proxy solves the problem intermittently is interesting.  I guess it could be some internal timing, or it might be that the proxy is masking a cross-domain policy issue or an SSL negotiation problem.  Have you guys tried with a Debugger version of Flash Player?  You might get some useful feedback, particularly if it's a policy file thing.
    Adobe Flash Player - Downloads
    Configure the debugger version of Flash Player
    You can turn on policy file logging by adding these to your mm.cfg.  They'll get logged to flashlog.txt:
    PolicyFileLog=1 # Enables policy file logging
    PolicyFileLogAppend=1 # Optional; do not clear log at startup

  • General Question about JRE - Versions and backward compatibility etc

    Could someone maybe help me with this query?
    I've got a group of network users who use a total of four java applications which I am told require different versions of the Java Runtime Environment to run.
    Is it therefore possible to have muliple versions of the RTE installed on one user machine to make all applications work at once or is it simply a case of having to have only one version of the JRE.
    I'm talking mainly about in house applications so I guess if some of them are incompatible with the latest JRE then the answer might be to find out what the problem is and fix the application so it works in the lates jre - or am I missing something?

    Hello,
    First of all, it is possible to keep several JRE installed in Windows. For example, my PC has JRE 1.3.1.8, 1.4.0.1, 1.4.2.6.
    Second. A tecnology exists to cause a Windowst to run a specific JRE for a specific Java applet. Please see the text below.
    HTML Applet Configuration
    � The standard (Internet) method of calling Java Runtime when using a Java Applet is to use an Applet tag within the HTML file itself specifying the applet details (example below). This tries to attach itself to Microsoft Java Runtime registry CLSID as detailed above.
    <applet code=Applet1.class width="200" height="200">
    Your browser does not support the <code>applet</code> tag.
    </applet>
    � When the above call is made either, a) the applet will load in the Microsoft Java Runtime, b) the applet will load in a particular Sun Java Runtime as it�s being redirected or c) the applet won�t load at all as Microsoft Java Runtime isn�t installed and Sun Java isn�t set as default.
    � The above can be uncontrolled as to what version of Java (if any) is actually used to launch an applet so have an alternative solution is to us the Object tag in place of the Applet tag. It�s only suitable for Internet Explorer in an internal, Intranet environment but should be ideal for us.
    � By replacing the Applet HTML tag with the Object tag when loading an applet you can specify in the tag either to use the latest installed version of Sun Java or a specific version by putting it�s CLSID in the list. (example below.)
    <OBJECT
    classid="clsid:CAFEEFAC-0014-0002-0006-ABCDEFFEDCBB"
    width="200" height="200">
    <PARAM name="code" value="Applet1.class">
    </OBJECT>
    � The advantage in the above approach is we can install a specific version of Java, i.e. 1.4.2.06 that doesn�t redirect the Microsoft Java Runtime so won�t effect other applications, and we can be safe in the knowledge that even if we install a newer version of Java on a machine that has 1.4.2.06 we won�t have any backwards compatibility problems.
    � The Object tag is an Internet Explorer only solution, but could be scaled, as to load a different version of Java you specify a different CLSID, whether that�s one of the versions of Sun Java or Microsoft Java or you can specify a CLSID that covers the latest installed version of Sun Java if you don�t want to tie the application to a specific version.
    Further details on the use of the Applet and Object tags can be found on the Sun website below so they may be of use if the HTML code that calls the Java applet can be easily changed to support our requirements.
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/plugin/developer_guide/using_tags.html
    http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/versions.html

  • Adobe Acrobat -Create PDF 1.0 does not work in FireFox 4.How do i directly convert pages to PDF??Why is that your products are not backward compatable.U people are in the IT industry and should know this.Shame on You people.learn somthing form the IE team

    While Updating to Fire Fox 4. It said Adobe Acrobat -Create PDF 1.0 is not supported.How come 3.6 supports but not 4. I believe you people have never heard of the term "Backward Compatibility" .U people will loose your customer/support base if every new version doesn't support some existing stuff.

    '''Problem Solved FINALLY !'''
    Solution:
    I just updated my '''Adobe Acrobat X Pro''' to '''Version 10.1.0'''.By the way, I have to complain, Adobe is really slow in solving this problem...
    Here is the official link for the Adobe Acrobat update.[http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5135 <click me!>http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5135<click me!>]
    After update, the extention changed from "Adobe Acrobat -Create PDF 1.0" into "Adobe Acrobat - Create PDF 1.1". And the '''"Adobe Acrobat - Create PDF 1.1" is compatiable with the firefox 4.0.1'''. A screenshot is attached as a proof.

  • Backwards Compatability of iWeb?..Problems

    On my main mac pro, I have all the latest updates of software etc. and my new iweb site (which is published but not yet launched) works great in Firefox and Safari.
    BTW..I'm still in the 60 day trial period.
    On my older mac at my other desk, I'm running 10.3.9 with Netscape,Safari, and Internet Explorer, all of which are (i think) updated as far as they can go in 10.3.9.
    Problem: the site does not load and function properly on the older mac. Top menue bar is gone, and the photo gallery page comes up blank.
    What is the backwards compatability of this iWeb program?? MOST visiters to a site are NOT going to have the latest and greatest software. Plus, I have NO idea about PC's.
    This could be a deal breaker for anyone who wants to use .Mac in a more serious capacity.
    Any thoughts of ideas??
    Craig

    The 10.3.9 Safari version does not support a lot of the advanced code that Safari 2 creates. For those users I believe the latest Firefox browser will work for them. With the release of Leopard imminent 10.3 is getting left further and further behind.
    The latest Internet Explorer version does handle the iWeb 2 pages satisfactorily as I understand. You can go to http://ipinfo.info/netrenderer/ and past your site's URL into the URL field provided and see how the different versions of IE will render the page. I think it does a fair job in duplicating how it will look. But I don't have a PC to compare.

  • Adobe Acrobat 6 and Adobe Reader 9 Web browser problem

    Good Day,
    I have a user that has Acrobat 6 and Reader 9 installed on the same computer. Acrobat 6 is used to edit (via open with -> Adobe Acrobat) while for normal reading, they use Adobe Reader 9 (since some files that were created in Acrobat 9 cannot be opened with Acrobat 6).
    From the desktop, everything works as it should. However, the problem is that when the user is trying to open a document on the web (from Internet Explorer 7) then instead of using Reader 9, it uses Acrobat 6 (and because is unable to open Acrobat 9 files) it gives an error saying that you need to have Adobe Reader 8 or 9 installed.
    So far I have tried the following:
    1) Reparing Reader 9
    2) Uninstalling Acrobat 6 running a repair on Reader 9 (which fixes the problem, until I reinstall Acrobat 6 again. I make sure I do not put a check mark on Read files on Internet Explorer)
    3) Went to Preferences on Acrobat 6 and unchecked Display PDF in browser.
    4) Checked on Manage Add-ins and tried disable any combination of Adobe PDF addin to make it work only with 9.
    Note: Reader version is the latest 9.4.1
    Any thoughts?
    Thanks
    Max

    Ok, so after I wrote the last post, I read through the related posts, and found the answer to
    what i was looking for.
    I guess it is unofficial, but I tested it today and works great:
    Registry that needs to be changed is:
    HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Software\Adobe\Acrobat\Exe
    Change the path (Acrobat 6) from "c:\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat6\Acrobat.exe"
    to the path of Reader 9 which would be something like "c:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 9.0\Reader\AcroRd32.exe"
    That fixed the problem.
    Thanks
    Max

  • How can I Download Adobe Acrobat 7 Standard (needed due to a compatibility problem)?

    How can I Download Adobe Acrobat 7 Standard (needed due to a compatibility problem)?

    Error: Activation Server Unavailable | CS2, Acrobat 7, Audition 3

  • Adobe Reader Backwards Compatibility

    I am currently working in Adobe Reader X, however the project I am working must be compatible with Adobe Reader 6. What kinds of compatibilty issues (if any) should I expect?

    There is no such thing as Adobe Reader 9 Pro, so lets get that confusion out of the way. Your co-worker will be using Acrobat Pro 9 (or Adobe Acrobat Pro 9 - but definitely nothing with Reader in the name).
    PDF compatability is a fairly complicated issue, and certainly isn't as simple as "you can't read with X what you write with Y".  But since Acrobat 6 (and Adobe Reader 6) things have been pretty stable, with new features added in such a way that they either work or are quietly ignored in older versions. There is something new called PDF Portfolios which must be avoided - and these can be seen as a way of combining PDFs. And fill-in forms are complicated. But apart from that you should be fine.

  • Backwards Compatibility: Acrobat 9

    Is there a setting that makes Acrobat 9 and/or Reader 9 Acrobat 7/8 compatible? In attempting to download PDFs from GuideStar, using Acrobat 9 or Reader 9 gets a message that Acrobat 7 or 8 is required. I am unable to find a compatibility setting anywhere in preferences.
    TIA,
    Lauren

    I would have thought that to be the case, Michael. I am wondering if the user was intimidated by the message, geared at users with Acrobat 6.0 Anything is possible!!
    Thanks a million!
    Lauren

Maybe you are looking for

  • LabView DSC, RSLinx, SLC505 and Data transfer (Best way for large blocks of data?)

    I am currently programming in Labview 6.1 with the Datalogging and Supervisory Control module to transfer 720 floating point numbers to a SLC505 Allen Bradley PLC (with ethernet) using RSLinx as an OPC server. I have found that using the Datasocket W

  • Studio license for more than one computer

    I have 8 people in a studio. I had to set up a bunch of "fake" adobe accounts in order for all of us to use the cloud. When will there be a corporate license for the cloud?

  • Unable to insert a table in DW MX 6.1.1842.0

    I have read a number of posts on this subject but none of the advice I have followed has rectified the problem. I hope someone here will be able to help. I am able to insert 'Table Objects' from the 'Insert Menu' in code view but am unable to insert

  • The currency cannot be displayed in ALV if I choose a saved layout

    I have a currency field in ALV, and I set the currency key for this field,   gr_fieldcat-cfieldname = 'WAERS'.   gr_fieldcat-datatype = 'CURR'.   gr_fieldcat-ctabname = 'ITAB_RESULT'. please see the following info: step 0, the original amount is 13.4

  • Htmlb help

    hi sdn i included all the jar files.but i get this error Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sapportals/portal/htmlb/page/PageProcessorComponent Loader Info - ClassLoader name: [com.sapportals.portal.prt.util.ApplicationClassLoader@1242f1e