BAD choice of purchase!

Hi I'm very despointed with my new ePrinter I want my money back ! I lost the reciet and I through away the box thinking that it wasa good buy... but i relaize that it doesn't have the old fetures and I can't find new ones that repalce what I was used to with my other HP all in one printer! This one the ink goes to QUICK it makes only about 40 copies at the time and I need to go for more ink INk costs me about $32.00 the combo. I want to replace it but since I can't I don't have the reciet nor the box for the product. WHere should I ask for a refund since a lost the reciet I bought at Walmart.

I would say ask for a refund at Walmart. Walmart s usually good about returns.
Let us know how you do with your return,

Similar Messages

For SD camcorder are miniDV tape and Firewire bad choices?

I just purchased a camcorder (Panasonic SDR_H40) which appears incompatible with iMovie HD 6, so I am going to return it. I currently have iMovie HD 6.0.3 and will probably stay with that version (based on some discussions on this site). I was going to buy a miniDV tape camcorder but they seem hard to find and the salesman said that this format was becoming obsolete. Also other discussions on this site suggest that Apple may be phasing out Firewire. Assuming that I can find a SD miniDV camcorder, presumably with a Firewire output, is this a bad choice for a camcorder? I'd appreciate any help.
Tricia

for 'Standard' (=not HiDef) video, miniDv is still an excellent choice:
° less compression => excellent pic quality
° no limitation in 'disk space' => insert new tape = another 13GB/60min recording time..
° easy/convenient long term storage of 'raw data' => keep the tapes
° 100% compatible with iMovie 6 and other versions..
prob here: actual consumer MacBooks lack a fw-port => miniDV import is via fw only.
your options: use your 'old' Mac; use a MacMini; use a MacPro ...
nobody can tell you about 'phasing' of fw on Macs .. +'we don't comment on future products'+ ..

Bad Choice for Fatal1ty

If you bought a set of the original Fatal1ty headphones with the huge comfortable earpads and the permanent swinging mic boom.....your one of the lucky ones like me. But if you like my wife waited a few months and purchased (online from Creative as we did both times) the Fatal1ty set Creative now sells........Bummer for you! The set they now sell is poorly engineered and has all sorts of problems. The parts are thinner, internal wiring is not shielded, workmanship is lacking all together, thus pressing the internal wiring over each other and pressed together when the earpc cover is screwed down. The wiring connections are made with glue not mineral (solder) and easily fall apart if left laying in a warm spot....say on top of your PC. Creative come on guys, who's the QC dude and what's he doing. Bad Choice for Fatal1ty product line. Or was that the idea all along? To sucker us!

Hi,
Pls refer to my reply in your other post.
Cheers.

I have a carillon 25 keyboard (bad choice, I know) and I can't get it to communicate with my mac at all! I'm running logic pro 9 and reason 5. I get signal in from my M Audio trigger finger so I know it isnt an entirely mac based problem. Thanks!!!

I have a carillon 25 keyboard (bad choice, I know) and I can't get it to communicate with my mac at all! I'm running logic pro 9 and reason 5. I get signal in from my M Audio trigger finger so I know it isnt an entirely mac based problem. Thanks!!!

Well, how have to determined no signal is being recieved to your mac?
Have you got something that shows the actual signal? Or have you just been trying to control a VST? What software are you using by the way?
I personnally went with a AKAI MPK25, because it's made already mapped for logic & ableton etc, so it just makes things incredibly easy.
I would suggest you return it if you can as a dead unit & perhaps look at something else a bit easier?
Otherwise, if you just want to get this working we can have a look a bit deeper.
And driver? OS X driver?

Bad performance updating purchase order (ME22N)

Hello!
Recently, we face bad performance updating purchase orders using transaction ME22N. The problem occurs since we implemented change documents for a custom table T. T is used to store additional data to purchase order positions using BAdIs ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST and ME_GUI_PO_CUST.
I've created a change document C_T for T using transaction SCDO. The update module of the change document is triggered in the method POST of BAdI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST.
Checking transaction SM13, I recognized that the update requests of ME22n have status INIT for several minutes before they are processed. I also tried to exclude the call of the update module for change document C_T (in Method POST) - the performance problem still occurs!
The problem only occurs with transaction ME22N, thus I assume that the reason is the new change document C_T.
Thanks for your help!
Greetings,
Wolfgang

I agree with vikram, we don't have enough information, even not a small hint on usage of this field, so which answer do you expect (The quality of an answer depends ...) This analysis must be executed on your system...
From a technical point of view, the BAPI_PO_CHANGE has EXTENSIONIN table parameter, fill it using structure BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM[X] alreading containing CI_EKPODB (*) and CI_EKPODBX (**)
Regards,
Raymond
(*) I guess you have used this include
(**) I guess you forgot this one (same field names but data element always BAPIUPDATE)

What is the BADI while SAVING purchase order using me22n?

what is the BADI while SAVING purchase order using me22n?
while i will save purchase order through me22n, badi should be fire what is badi for that?
regards,
dushyant.

Dushyant,
Hopefully you know how to implement the BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST now.
The following are the codes that you can put in the method "Post".
DATA: LW_HEADER        TYPE MEPOHEADER,
        LW_POSTED_HEADER TYPE MEPOHEADER,
        LW_VALID         TYPE MMPUR_BOOL,
        ITAB_ITEM        TYPE PURCHASE_ORDER_ITEMS,
        LW_ITEM          TYPE MEPOITEM,
        ITEM_INTERFACE   TYPE PURCHASE_ORDER_ITEM,
        ITAB_ACCT        TYPE PURCHASE_ORDER_ACCOUNTINGS,
        ACCT_INTERFACE   TYPE PURCHASE_ORDER_ACCOUNTING,
        LW_ACCT          TYPE MEPOACCOUNTING,
        LW_POSTED_ACCT   TYPE MEPOACCOUNTING,
        W_ACCT_CHANGED TYPE C,
        W_GRANT_AMT      TYPE EKPO-NETWR,
        W_FINANCE_AMT    TYPE EKPO-NETWR,
        W_FLAG           TYPE C.
Check if PO header data is valid
CLEAR LW_VALID.
CALL METHOD IM_HEADER->IS_VALID
    RECEIVING
      RE_VALID = LW_VALID.
CHECK LW_VALID = 'X'.
PO header data is valid
Get the newly updated PO header data
CLEAR LW_HEADER.
CALL METHOD IM_HEADER->GET_DATA
    RECEIVING
      RE_DATA = LW_HEADER.
Get the posted PO header data
CLEAR LW_POSTED_HEADER.
CALL METHOD IM_HEADER->GET_PERSISTENT_DATA
    IMPORTING
      EX_DATA = LW_POSTED_HEADER
    EXCEPTIONS
      NO_DATA = 1.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    CLEAR LW_POSTED_HEADER.
ENDIF.
Get PO line items
REFRESH ITAB_ITEM.
CALL METHOD IM_HEADER->GET_ITEMS
    RECEIVING
      RE_ITEMS = ITAB_ITEM.
LOOP AT ITAB_ITEM INTO ITEM_INTERFACE.
Check if PO line item is valid
    CLEAR LW_VALID.
    CALL METHOD ITEM_INTERFACE-ITEM->IS_VALID
      RECEIVING
        RE_VALID = LW_VALID.
    IF LW_VALID <> 'X'.
This PO line item is not valid
      CLEAR W_ACCT_CHANGED.
      EXIT.
    ENDIF.
    CLEAR LW_ITEM.
    CALL METHOD ITEM_INTERFACE-ITEM->GET_DATA
      RECEIVING
        RE_DATA = LW_ITEM.
Get the account interface
    REFRESH ITAB_ACCT.
    CALL METHOD ITEM_INTERFACE-ITEM->GET_ACCOUNTINGS
      RECEIVING
        RE_ACCOUNTINGS = ITAB_ACCT.
    LOOP AT ITAB_ACCT INTO ACCT_INTERFACE.
      CLEAR LW_ACCT.
Get the newly updated PO item data
      CALL METHOD ACCT_INTERFACE-ACCOUNTING->GET_DATA
        RECEIVING
          RE_DATA = LW_ACCT.
      CLEAR LW_POSTED_ACCT.
Get the posted PO item data
      CALL METHOD ACCT_INTERFACE-ACCOUNTING->GET_PERSISTENT_DATA
        IMPORTING
          EX_DATA = LW_POSTED_ACCT
        EXCEPTIONS
          NO_DATA = 1.
      IF SY-SUBRC > 0.
        CLEAR LW_POSTED_ACCT.
      ENDIF.
      IF LW_ACCT-LOEKZ <> LW_POSTED_ACCT-LOEKZ OR
         LW_ACCT-KOSTL <> LW_POSTED_ACCT-KOSTL OR
         LW_ACCT-PRCTR <> LW_POSTED_ACCT-PRCTR OR
         LW_ACCT-PS_PSP_PNR <> LW_POSTED_ACCT-PS_PSP_PNR.
Account assignment was changed
We will force this PO to go through workflow
        W_ACCT_CHANGED = 'Y'.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.

French è in modified files name is a bad choice (french version)

French version.
As Photoshop Album, LR add a suffix with an è (the long french world Modifié) to file name when you mofify an image with external editor Photoshop.
It is a bad choice to add an accentuated character (è) to a file name. When you publish picture on the Web. Many Web softwares or Internet Web sites providers, dont make any différence between e and è, so links can be broken. For instance, you can get è in HTML link (if you use an french HTML editor) but e in file name on provider disk.
It would be much better to apply a shorter suffix, with no localized specific character : bis, alt, supp, corr...

't Was the GREP styles ... It wasn't even as if they were that complex, but they did add a layer of complexity by adding No-Breaks (and not even to much text either).[*]
Rather than temporarily removing the NoBreak in the applied character style, I just deleted all GREP styles from my paragraph styles. But it doesn't matter which temporary solution I choose, because any global change in the styling will have the text re-flown. However, I can live with that if it means I can get the work done in one day instead of ten.
[*] After reading Uwe's links (in German): it's not because of my particular application of No Break. It seems Extreme Slow-Down occurs as soon as you apply a GREP style to an element that occurs a lot; the contents of the GREP seems not to matter.
Martin Fischer wrote:
Nachdem ich die GREP-Stile für die Fremdalphabete und Sonderzeichen gelöscht habe, stelle ich fest, dass der genannte Verzögerungsfaktor von 5-10 deutlich untertrieben war. Jetzt erst zeigt sich wieder, wie InDesign flutschen kann. Das Arbeiten macht wieder Spaß.
[After I killed off the GREP styles for foreign language alphabets and special characters, I found that the mentioned slowdown factor of 5-10x was even understated. Only now InDesign again shows it can fly. Work is fun again.]

User-exit/BADI to change Purchase Contract item field ??

Hello,
I need to update the Order acknowledgement field(EKPO-KZABS) for the Purchase contract via transaction ME32K.
I need to know if there is any user exit or BADI for the Purchase contracts (Outline agreement), so that this field KZABS can be updated while saving. I did not find any user exit so far in which line item is a export parameter. There is one BADI definition ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST but it is called only in case of Purchase Orders and not in the contracts. Please let me know if you have some idea how to do this.

check these exits....
EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
<b>EXIT_SAPMM06E_013</b>
EXIT_SAPMM06E_014
EXIT_SAPMM06E_006
EXIT_SAPMM06E_007
EXIT_SAPMM06E_018
EXIT_SAPMM06E_016
EXIT_SAPMM06E_017
vijay

MSI P67-GD65 (B3) Did I make a bad choice? I'm building a new system!

After reading all the problems everyone seems to be having with boot problems and freezing, did I make a bad choice? Here's what I'm putting together when the parts arrive.
It's been a few years since I built my own rig, but every pc I've ever owned I built myself except my Dell XPS 630i (got a screaming deal).
MSI P67-GD65 (B3)
Intel i7-2600K unlocked and unleashed
CORSAIR high performance Vengeance memory module 8GB (2x4GB) 1600MHz 9-9-9-24, 1.5V
Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 6970 2GB GDDR5 PCI-E 1080P
Western Digital Caviar Black 1T Hard Drive
Dell XPS 630i Case and Delll 750W power supply (I know I shouldn't reuse this case)
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit

"Dell XPS 630i Case~I know I shouldn't reuse this case"
Poor case for cooling with quad CPU and higher power consuming VGA card as you sure will end up with high temperature problems. It would be wise to get a better case.

My Dad gave me his old Macbook Pro and I downloaded another version of Lion so it's tied to my ID and it worked but I cannot download and iLife apps at all? It doesn't even give me a choice to purchase it just say accept?

My Dad gave me his old Macbook Pro and I downloaded another version of Lion so it's tied to my ID and it worked but I cannot download any iLife apps at all? It doesn't even give me a choice to purchase it just say accept? And gives me a dropbox that says that these apps are tied to another ID and I need to log into that ID in order to download it.

The Apple Support Communities are an international user to user technical support forum. As a man from Mexico my first language is Spanish. I do not speak English, however I do write in English with the aid of the Mac OS X spelling and grammar checks. I also live in a culture perhaps very very different from your own. When offering advice in the ASC, my comments are not meant to be anything more than helpful and certainly not to be taken as insults.
This is a common issue with second hand Macs. The iLife apps came bundled free on this Mac and they are registered to your dad's Apple ID. The only way for you to acept them into your Apple ID is for you and your dad to contact Apple Care, explain that he has passed the Mac to you and ask that the iLife apps be released from your dad's Apple ID so that you may accept them into your Apple ID.

BADI/EXIT in Purchase Order

Hi ALL,
When i create a PO , payment terms displays automatically because In vendor master payment terms is maintained but in some case based on the material/vendor combination i have to select a different payment terms which i have maintained in a Z table. What i should know is, Is there any BADI/Exit which will be triggered
1) when a line item is entered where i should be able to change the payments terms value (OR)
2) when i check the Purchase order
3) When i save the purchase order.
Note : Both Header & Line item value should be available in the EXIT/BADI.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajanidhi Rajasekeran.

Hi,
Follow the below steps to find out what all BADI's are called when you press any button in any transaction.
1) Goto se24 (Display class cl_exithandler)
2) Double click on the method GET_INSTANCE.
3) Put a break point at Line no.25 (CASE sy-subrc).
Now
4) Execute SAP standard transaction
5) Press the required button for which you need to write an exit logic, the execution will stop at the break point.
6) Check the values of variable 'exit_name', it will give you the BADI name called at that time.
7) This way you will find all the BADIs called on click of any button in any transaction.
Regs,
Venkat Ramanan

User-Exit OR a BAdi for the Purchase order create.

Hi,
I am looking for a User-Exit or a BAdi which is fired when the Purchase order is being created in the SRM server via Web template. The requirement is as follows:
There is a flag(Check box) at the the item level, Basic Data tab. This flag is called as Unlimited Overdelivery Allowed. It is with the tolerances field. Now I want this flag to be always set for a PO of a material of certain type.
Can anyone tell me which User-Exit OR Badi I should use to always set this flag?
The Technical field name is UNLIMITED.
I tried a lot but could not get any.
Regards,
Deepak.

Hi Deepak,
Did you try doc_change badi? THis badi is available in all the bus objects.
thanks,
Ashwin

User exit/BADI for updating Purchase Order Item

I am would like to update the purchase order item - specifically field EKPO-REPOS in a user exit or BADI. I haven't been able to find one that allows you to update the purchase order item.
Any input would be appreciated.
Derick

You can use BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST for you requirement
Method PROCESS_ITEM
* Retrieve item data.
    CALL METHOD im_item->get_data
      RECEIVING
        re_data = v_data_item.
Do you validations and changes here
*update changes
CALL METHOD im_item->set_data( v_data_item ).

BADI requirement for Purchase Order

Hello,
I have to find a BADI for Purchase order which will satisfy requirement stated below.
When processing on PO will be done for Goods received and/or Final delivery and/or Final invoice , I need to trigger an Idoc from BADI which will inform another client that flags stated above are set against that PO.
Which BADI can be used to find information of these flag are set on PO as soon as it is processed and which in trun help me to trigger this idoc?
Regards,
Madhura

try with MB_DOCUMENT_BADI
this BADi will get trig for all goods movement transaction.
better u go for user exits, insteed of BADi

User exit or BADI while saving purchase order

Hello,
I want to use an user exit or BADI while saving of purchase order. The objective is to check the material group of the line item while saving. We don´t want to allow to save purchase orders for one material group.
Can you please guide me.
Thanks
Srinivasan

Hi
The Business Add-In (BAdI) ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST enables you to extend the business logic of the Enjoy purchase order on an individual basis.
You can thus influence the dialog transactions ME21N, ME22N, ME23N, and ME29N, and the BAPIs BAPI_PO_CREATE1 and BAPI_PO_CHANGE.
Typical applications for this BAdI include:
Processing of own objects
Processing of additional data on standard objects
Implementation of additional checks and derivationsChange of data in standard fields
Change in field selection
you can use this BADI for checking the material group
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

BAD choice of purchase!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for