Bad image quality when importing from word

When importing from MS Word 2003 to RH X5.0.2, embedded
images are converted to jpg whith an obviously quite moderate
compression qulity. This is particularly evident for screenshots.
Is there a way to improve the image quality?

Peter , these images were copied and pasted directly in to
the Word-document (using the Print Screen button) but I did find
out something. RoboHelp generates two image files of the types PNG
and JPG for each Word image (named, e.g., image102.png and
image103.jpg). Regretably, the lesser quality JPG is always
referenced in the topics instead of the much better PNG. Sometimes
the two images greately differ in size (pixel size), but most of
the time they are about the same size.
So the task might be to change the references in all topics
using a script and then manually checking the images for their
size.
An observation: Any GIF images in the Word file (i.e., real
*.gif files that were inserted over the Insert menue) remain GIF
files after the import, they are not converted and maintain a good
quality.

Similar Messages

  • Bad pdf quality when printing from word 2004

    hello,
    when i print a document with a lot of screenshots from wort in the save as pdf dialogue... the pictures in the document have a very bad quality.
    where can i defin or setup the general quality for the print as a pdf?
    i know, that there is a option for compressing file size as a pdf, but I work with the normal saving as a pdf.. and in the help, apple says, that this is the optimum quality..
    can anyone help me?
    thanks
    fabian

    Hi Fabian -
    Screenshots produce very low resolution images... 72 pixels per inch on the Mac. The settings you are using do produce optimum quality, but based on what you are starting with, and 72 ppi is not sufficient for decent printed output.
    If you save the screenshots (Grab saves as TIFF), use an image editor like Photoshop to create a better quality image (200 ppi) & then insert the image into your doc you'll get higher quality output.
    There are also other programs that allow for higher quality screenshots if this is something you will need to do on a professional/regular basis.
    HTH |:>)

  • How do you increase image quality when importing from Illustrator?

    I have a logo that I created in Adobe Illustrator that I'm trying to place in Muse.  Every time that I do so, it's very low quality, fuzzy and pixelated.  After doing some reading around the discussion board, I tried resizing the image in both Illustrator and Photoshop so that I wouldn't have to do so in Muse.  That didn't help at all.  I also tried adding 1% transparency, which also did no good.  I know it's a high resolution image, so I have absolutely no idea what I'm doing wrong. 
    Thoughts?

    Is there a solid white rectangle behind the logo in AI? If not, please try again after putting a 100% opaque white rectangle behind it.
    When smoothing the edges of content (anti-aliasing), the options are limited if the background color is not specified (transparent). If the background colors are known and 100% opaque, then much higher quality anti-aliasing can be achieved.
    PNG preserves transparency. JPEG is opaque. When going to JPEG I would have expected AI to have performed high quality anti-aliasing, but perhaps that isn't the case. If you open the PNG and/or JPEG output from AI in Photoshop does it look pixelated there?

  • Does improving bit rate improve quality when importing from a lossy file?

    Okay, if that question made no sense, here's an example:
    I have a 5 Megabyte file encoded as an MP3 at 192 kbps.
    I like to keep all my files in one format though, and currently my preferred format is AAC.
    Would it make sense to convert it to 320 kbps AAC?
    I get the feeling that since the data for that bitrate is gone (since MP3 is lossy)
    it wouldn't make any sense trying to improve the bitrate. All I would get is a large file
    that sounds the same as 192 kbps AAC.
    Is that right?

    Yes and No.
    You are right that converting to 320kpbs AAC will not increase the quality since the data is already gone.
    However for the next but you are slightly wrong.
    What you will get is a large file that sounds the same as 192kbps MP3, which is not as good as 192kbps AAC (AAC is better quality than MP3 at the same bitrate).
    Also, there is always a loss in quality when going from one lossy format to another.
    If it's possible to go and re-encode the original source material at a higher bit-rate AAC I would definately do that, but if all you have is the 192kpbs MP3, then just leave them as they are and don't worry about having different formats.

  • Really bad image quality when burning

    Hi, i am very new at this discussion thing and am a french speaker so hope i do this ansking question ok.
    I'm having problems with image quality of my 1h46 min movie imported from imovie (initially from quicktime made from final cut pro). I am having pixelly images when camera is moving... Although have read some things about this on the forum none of the answers seem to resolve my problem.
    I have selected best quality in my prefs but with no success. I figure it's a compression / codec problem but i do not have a clue about all this technical stuff. I don't know what next move i should make.
    Thanks for any help...
    V
    I'm using iMac G5 divided my 250 GB in 2 disks wich has 31 Go of free space on my HD at the moment. Using iDVD and i Movie 6.0.2
    Imac G5   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   2.1 GHz Power PC G5, mémoire 1.5 GO DDR2 SDram

    Hi ! Thanx for responding...
    In FCP i did choose export DV/NTSC and imported from camera with apple firewire NTSC (720x480). Should i have imported material in (640x480/30fps/interlaced...) ?
    I have had this problem with smaller projects of 20 min of video also so i don't think it has to do with size... At the moment i am making a disc image of my dvd on my desktop hoping to burn through Toast. Otherwise i am also thinking about exporting movie from FCP to tape then importing back to iMov through camera...
    I'm kind of desperate and don't really know what to do... I'm also gonna start reading compressor 2 and maybe forget about iDVD an d just burn it through toast. Wich is kind of dissapointing cause without interface, menu and all...
    V

  • Poor image quality when importing SWF

    I maintain a site for a photographer and as he added more
    images the SWF got to be very large, so I split up the site and
    used a main page to import the smaller SWF files into a target.
    However, I found that all my clean crisp images become dull when
    imported but still look sharp in the SWF itself. I tied to find all
    the JPEG settings and push them up but still with no luck. Does
    anybody have any insight to why this is happening?

    Hello micsaint111111111111,
    The reason they look more blurry than in the original swf is
    that you are
    dealing with dual compression from the original swf AND the
    swf you are loading
    the images into.
    The easiest/best way to import your jpgs would be using
    LoadMovie to load
    the actual jpg files. That keeps all the jpgs separate so
    your swf file will
    be tiny. Plus the quality will be the same as the original
    jpg.
    That said- have you gone into your swfs and changed the
    default image quality
    on each of the images to 90 or 100? You do that in your
    library by right-clicking
    on the actual images and then going to Properties and
    unchecking "Use document
    default quality". That is one issue that a lot of people seem
    to miss and
    it might help if you don't want to recode your Flash with the
    LoadMovie method.
    Jesse H.
    Adobe Community Expert
    My site:
    http://www.jharding.com
    Free Blog Radio:
    http://www.tornadostream.com
    > I maintain a site for a photographer and as he added
    more images the
    > SWF got to be very large, so I split up the site and
    used a main page
    > to import the smaller SWF files into a target. However,
    I found that
    > all my clean crisp images become dull when imported but
    still look
    > sharp in the SWF itself. I tied to find all the JPEG
    settings and
    > push them up but still with no luck. Does anybody have
    any insight to
    > why this is happening?
    >

  • Poor image quality when displaying OLE Word object in PDF

    MS Word 2007 OLE object in Crystal Reports XII R2 designer...looks OK in designer.  When we export to PDF, the image quality has been degraded significantly.  Anybody had this issue before?  tried replacing usp10.dll with one found in CommonFiles folder, that did not help.

    Hi Mark,
    See if this [kbase |http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes_boj/sdn_oss_boj_bi/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/scn_bosap/notes%7B6163636573733d36393736354636443646363436353344333933393338323636393736354637333631373036453646373436353733354636453735364436323635373233443330333033303331333233313333333633383336%7D.do] - SAP Note 1213686 - Certain objects do not appear clearly when exporting to PDF/RTF/Word formats - article resolves the issue. It's for CR 9 so you'll have to browse to the CR XI registry structure.
    Otherwise try all of the patches for CR XI R2:
    Keep your Keycode and then uninstall XI R2, unless you are on SP 4 then just apply SP 5 and 6:
    https://smpdl.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100011802732008E/crxir2_sp4_full_build.exe
    https://smpdl.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100013876392008E/crxir2win_sp5.exe
    https://smpdl.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100015859952009E/crxir2win_sp6.exe
    Thank you
    Don

  • Poor Quality When Imported From FCP

    Hello I have been having issues when importing a QT files into After Effects. When exported from FCP and imported into After Effects the footage loses significant quality, maybe a little interlaced. Ive checked and double checked fields, Im exporting in animation. Ive done both QT movie and QT conversion with the same result. Also it happens with files exported from FCP from other computers. Ive checked export settings & coposition settings. Any Ideas?
    Thanks

    bogiesan wrote:
    -DWS- wrote:
    Thanks. That is what makes the most sense to me. How do I elect how After Effects interprets the footage? I went to preferences but couldn't find anything that fixed the problem there.
    See the help system for Interpret Footage.
    It's a right-click dropdown form the project pane. Select a footage item, Interpret Footage.
    Thank you Lower Fields first was selected

  • Poor Video quality when importing from SONY DCR-SR100

    I am brand new to Mac and iMovie and FCE. One of the reasons I switched to Mac was frustration over poor video output from Windows based video editing programs. When importing video from the SR100 into iMovie and then iDVD, the DVD quality is noticeably poorer than when the camera is connected directly to the Plasma TV. I have been reading these forums and loaded MPEG Streamclip and purchased the Quicktime MPEG2 Download, but I still can't get the video output to look as good as the camera. I obviously have some learning to do, but is there any hope of achieving equal quality output from a DVD as straight from the camera? Is there a good source of information/textbook on this topic? The biggest improvement comes from using the "de-interlace" option in MPEG Streamclip, but the overall quality of the video appears washed out and somewhat blotchy compared to the direct camera footage.

    Welcome to the macworld! What imovie does incredibly well is make it easy to create fun and interesting movies. I have used both for several years and only recently with some packages such as adobe premiere elements has the windows world kept up with the mac with respect to ease of use! And even know the packages are still not as easy as imovie. Anyway, with respect to your post and getting the video quality to the best possible output quality using DV material, you are on the right path. The best workflow is to use streamclip and de-interlace prior to editing in imovie. I am not sure if you are doing that yet with your workflow. Yes, its an extra step, but it is well worth it to avoid imovie dropping a field upon export. You can play around with the adjustments to increase contrast, color and et al on the adjustment button. Another option is shooting progressive.
    To set expectations, it is second generation footage the minute its imported. However, you should be still getting very good results. FCE gets footage closer to the original footage since it is a true DV editor and uses both fields, but imovie is still preferred by me because of how easy it is to skim, tag and find the material you want then easily do transitions and ken burns for photo's. Fantastic. The way i look at it....watching footage straight from the camera is the worst quality you can get -- It's like listening to your spouse talk and talk and talk and never get to the point until you forget what that point was....editing gets the footage straight to the point....thats quality!
    Sheryl
    Message was edited by: Sheryl Kingstone

  • Text Quality when Importing from PowerPoint

    We're having to do a certain amount of importing from PowerPoint for productivity reasons.  Some slides show good imported text and some slides show really scraggy text.  I can't find any pattern behind this behaviour and have tried lots of different settings to try to get to the bottom of the issue.
    Has anybody else encountered this?  More's the point, has anybody else encountered it and managed to find out how to get consistently good text?

    We're using Captivate 7.  The powerpoint files are .pptx, either 2007 or 2010.
    Standard Arial system font.
    I don't know how the SMEs are creating the PowerPoint content, but I've tried it using both Powerpoint placeholders in the standard Office theme, and using inserted text boxes, and they all import and view just fine.  There doesn't seem to be any pattern to when the text goes scraggy.

  • Poor image quality when displaying OLE Word doc stored in BLOB

    Hello,
    I am migrating some CR Reports from VB6 to VB.NET 2008.
    The reports retrieves Word documents that is stored in BLOB column on SQL Server 2005.
    If CR.NET (same behaviour with 2005 and 2008 versions) renders the word document, the quality is really bad. Looks like an ugly moire effect. The characters below 8pt font size are hardly readable.  I have already set the option "use full color-depth" in the report options.
    If the same word doc is rendered with CR that's included in VB6, it shows a clear and sharp output - the same as displayed in word.
    Where is the difference in handling Word OLE between those two CR versions?
    Is there anything I can do to improve the quality with CR.NET?
    Regards,
    Stefan

    Hello, Stefan;
    Is this a Windows or Web application?
    Visual Basic 6.0 shipped with Crystal Reports 4.6 Visual Studio .NET 2005 ships with Crystal Reports 10.2 and VS .NET 2008 with version 10.5.
    The Crystal Reports application was rewritten in versions 5.0 and  9.0 and a great many changes were made - among them different options for including OLE Objects. See the [Note 1218374|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes_boj/sdn_oss_boj_erq/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/scn_bosap/notes.do] for useful new functionality. I tested a report with a linked Word document and it viewed well through Visual Studio .NET 2008.
    Is it possible support for the  the Word format as a BLOB field in MS SQL Server has changed over time. What method is used to create the document as a BLOB field?
    Are you using the bundled version included with Visual Studio .NET? In the article recommending the property 'Retain Original Image Color Depth', there is a note:
    Note: This option only functions with the full version of Crystal Reports 9 or 10. This option does not function with the .NET Report Designer.
    Originally the issue was fixed but only in a full versions of Crystal Reports Developer, not in the versions bundled with Visual Studio .NET.
    I tested with a linked Word document and see some degradation when there is an image in the Word Document but not in the text itself.
    Elaine

  • Low quality when importing from camcorder

    Hello,
    I have an older camcorder (Sony TRV260, Digital8), and I noticed that when I import the footage into iMovie the quality is lower than when I watch it on my TV directly from the camera.
    Initially I thought that it's because the resolution of my iMac is higher, but even when I burn it on DVD it looks bad, almost pixelated.
    Are there any settings that I need to adjust?
    Any help is much appreciated. I have a whole bunch of tapes that I kept hoping that, once I get my iMac I will be able to edit and put them on DVD. Now I am really-really frustrated.
    What needs to be done?
    Many thanks in advance for your help.
    Laurentiu

    I got iMovie 06 but, when I tried to install it said that I should have iLife 08 installed.
    That's because you have iMovie 6.0.4 you want 6.0 > 6.0.3 ONLY 6.0.4 looks for iLife '08.
    You can get iMovie 06 in a number of ways. You cannot download it FROM APPLE any longer (it was free for a time). You can also find iMovie 06 on the iLife 06 install disc. You can buy iLife 06 on Amazon or eBay. WELL WORTH EVERY PENNY!
    iMovie 6.0.4 requires that iLife 08 is already installed. iMovie 6.0 thru iMovie 6.0.3 has no such requirement. There are no known functional differences between 6.0.3 and 6.0.4. If you install iMovie 06 from the iLife 06 disk it will probably be version 6.0 or 6.01. However you can update the software to 6.0.3 from Apple's Web site.
    http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/apple/application_updates/imoviehd602combo .html
    http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/apple/application_updates/imoviehd603.html
    If you want to have both iMovie 06 and iLife 09 (and most do) just install iMovie 06 first, then iLife 09. You are now UN-STOPPABLE!
    Also when you install iLife 08 or 09, iMovie 06 is not removed from the computer. Previous editions of iMovie were always un-installed when "upgrading" in the past. Apple leaves iMovie 06 on your system, because they want you to have it. iMovie 06 works great with iDVD 09.

  • Poor quality when importing from sony dcr-sr58

    Dear All
    I've got a sony dcr-sr58e video camera, and for ages the quality has been poor, once i've, a) imported the footage from the camera into imovie then b) from there to idvd then c) watching it back on a tv
    I thought it was just me being fussy, but friends and colleagues have noticed that its quality is comparable with an old vhs video camera!
    I put all the settings to the max (high quality etc....)on the camera but to no effect, and have checked the settings on imovie
    The sony support have stated that its probably a problem with imovie (which it doesn't seem to be)
    Fot the record i'm running OSX 10.6.8  with imovie version 9.0.4
    If anyone else has had a similar problem and solve dit i'd be very grateful to hear
    Thanks
    Kelly

    Hello kellyfromkenley, Depending on how you move the video or share the video from iMovie to iDVD it can make a big difference. One way is to go to the Share Menu > Share to iDVD. But the better is to Share to Media Browser instead. Try this:
    Go back to iMovie and open your Project in Project Library.
    Go to Share Menu > Share to Media Browser
    Choose the Large size and let it run until it finishes
    Quit iMovie and open iDVD.
    In iDVD click on the Media Button, then click on the Movies button and look for your project under the iMovie star icon in the Media Browser itself.
    Drag that project icon into the iDVD project window and burn another disk
    I think you'll see an increase in the visual quality using this method.
    The reason this has an effect on the visual quality is there's a whole different set of operations performed on the video when you first Share to Media Browser. The side effect of those changes in steps is a much better looking DVD from your iMovie project.

  • Poor image quality when played from dvd just burned

    I exported a FCP file from FCP using Compressor using several variations: uncompressed, compressed MPEG2 etc... brought the file into DVDSP and burned it to a DVD. when i play it from the dvd on my computer monitor it has these terrible lines and there are dropped frames occassionally. It doesnt look that way when I play it directly from DVDSP or from FCP only from the dvd. What is the problem here and how do I get a dvd whose quality matches the original?

    All video brought into DVDSP for authoring is converted to the same format for DVDs, MPEG2.
    Your "terrible lines" are probably interlacing artifacts. Look up interlacing in the manual. they always look worse on a computer monitor since that's a progressive display.
    Stuttering can be caused by tons of oddball glitches, no way ot even start guessing from where I'm sitting.
    but the whole process of going form FCP to DVDSP successfully is clearly and exhaustively explained in about 100 pages of the manuals and, yes, it really can be that complicated.
    bogiesan

  • Images broken when imported from iPhone

    This is how most of my iPhone images were imported in iPhoto. Any clue how to fix this? Thanks!

    As a Test:
    Hold down the option (or alt) key and launch iPhoto. From the resulting menu select 'Create Library'
    Import a few pics into this new, blank library. Is the Problem repeated there?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to deploy a Simple Process

    Hi, I am stuck with a major deployment issue. I am using jdeveloper 11.1.1.2, I want to test a process which only has a human task. i have auto generated a task form for the same and want to accept 2 values from the user and assign it to the output.

  • Do you need MapInfo EasyLoader to store TAB files in 8i or 9i?

    We are a MapInfo reseller and are trying to determine if our client would need to purchase MapInfo EasyLoader to store TAB files in Oracle 8i or 9i. Also if anyone can help me, would a client using SDE be able to store SHP files in Oracle 8 or would

  • Vendor id has changed to the name of the sample! Bug??

    I started filling in the information on the itmsp file. Then I closed it and reopened it. where before the Vendor ID was a number, now it has the file name of the Sample?? I haven't finished the itmsp file so I don't know what will happen when i try

  • Can't use the knife tool to cut the rounded rectangle

    The knife tool is grayed out when I try to use it ona rounded rectangle. How can I errase part of a rounded rectangle?

  • XI Demo data generation

    I was trying to install the flight demo and get to the point where I need to generate flight data. According to the menu, there should be an menu path to execute the program (Exchange Infrastructure->Demo Examples-> Settings: Generate Flight Data), h