Bad looking DVD

I have a feature length film shot with a Sony FX-1.
The footage is all HDV 1080i.
I used PP for editing and using Encore for DVD authoring.
All my attempts so far result in absurdly bad looking video when previewed in Encore on the computer, or burned to dvd and watched on TV.
The main problem is when there is movement in the video its very jerky.
The interrum video files exported out of PP look fine by the way.
I'm pretty sure the problem is I need to export out of Premiere with some kind of special top secret settings to get it to look ok in DVD format.
Anyone privy to these settings?
Quality is my main concern, file size is not a concern.

I need to see if I have this correct. I shoot with the camera set in 1080i HD. I edit in Premiere with the setting for 1080i HD but when I export to AVI to be used in Encore I should make sure the field is UPPER since it is HD even though Encore will be told to burn as a regular (non-Blu Ray) DVD. Correct?
If I set the cameras on DV wide screen (non-HD)then bring it into Premiere as a DV project wide screen, I should export it as an AVI with lower field first before using it in Encore. Correct?
Because I am getting the same artifacts in the final burn. Lines during movement. Red pixelation on some transitions, or when a flash gun fires.
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • Bad quality DVDs

    I'm getting really bad quality DVDs, especially the menus. I created the menus in Motion and used them as menus in DVDSP 4. I build the DVD in DVDSP and everything looks OK, even when I play it using DVD Player, but when I burn it and play the disc with Player it looks dreadful, like bad encoding. I'm encoding with VBR at a bit rate of 5 with a max of 6.5. Any ideas? Thanks.
    Chuck

    Hi CHuck,
    i've never used Motion, but i can't help you there except to say double check that you are using the full quality settings.
    Did you use 1 pass or 2 pass VBR? Your bitrate seems fine. What was the source (Vhs; camcorder; stills?) Try the DVD on another player. Some of mine look different on my samsung player than on my Sony, with the latter looking much better.
    Are you using a brand name type of DVD media? That could be a problem if not. Are you burning at 1xDVD speed (only available through Toast). Maybe the burn speed is too high?
    Cheers,
    keebler

  • H.264 Looks Bad on DVD

    I have some vidoes that I got from the internet that are in H.264. When I watch it on the computer and preview it in iDVD it looks great, but when I watch it on the DVD it looks terrible. I have already tried converting it to dv and MPEG-4. Does anybody have any suggestions?

    When I was editing, I pulled the DV footage into an HDV sequence. I exported the file in Apple ProRes 422. Once I did that, I brought it into Compressor and compressed it using DVD: Best Quality 150 minutes (since it was going to run slightly over 120 min.). Specifically, it compressed to mpeg-2 and dolby digital professional 2.0. Both sources were the same frame rate.
    What's puzzling me is that it looked bad on my tv but just fine on my friends HD tv. Hope some of this info helps in troubleshooting my issue.
    Thanks.

  • An even better looking DVD?

    I always use Shane's Stock Answer to create my DVD's but when I give the DVD to my local cable company it still looks very bad. I do realize that the cause is from the cable company's compression issues and the fact they use composite out to feed the system before back hauling the feed 70 miles to their headend! But are there any additional tips I can use to improve the quality? I shoot 720p 60 and edit in a ProRes LT timeline. I use Compressor to encode using best quality 90 minute DVD, then take that into DVD SP. Any tips will be greatly appreciated. Thank goodness I also put this production on the web because it looks so bad on cable. www.northcoastgameoftheweek.com
    Best.
    Tom

    Thanks Shane. The DVD looks fine in my suite so I guess I'll just let it go. Thanks for the quick reply. You always have great insight and knowledge. Out here, we really appreciate that. I used to air the program from a 3/4 SP deck directly into the modulator at the headend. Looked pretty good. Now they back haul it from Sandusky 70 mile to Toledo and back again! It is fiber but the DVD player at Sandusky's headend feeds the fiber using composite out. Yech. The web is the future. Now I just need to learn compressor better. Thanks again.
    Best.
    Tom

  • Bad quality DVDs with DVD SP 4

    I have created some slideshows in Aperture and one in FCP, exported them in PAL 720x576 progressive 16:9, frame rate 25.
    When I preview them in Quick time on my computer monitor they look great. As soon as I import them in DVD SP and stimulate, or buid/format to preview, all the images loose considerable quality with the graphics and text pixelated...
    My settings in DVD SP are: SD DVD, PAL, encoding: MPEG-2 SD 16:9
    What's weird is that the dvd menu appears pixelated too. Is it just a matter of monitor? From previous tests, I know for a fact that the Aperture slideshows do loose quality, when the dvd is tested on a tv screen.
    I spoke to an Aperture pro today from Apple service and he told me that since the exported movies look good on quicktime, it should be a DVD SP issue.
    Any suggestions on what settings could be wrong, or anything I can improve to get better results for my slideshow DVD? (unfortunately I couldn't contact an DVD SP pro for that since they charge £80 per question if you're not covered! - apple care is not enough by the way...)
    Can you help me please?

    > exported them in PAL 720x576 progressive 16:9, frame rate 25. <
    MPEG2 is an interlaced format, usually. Try exporting interlaced from Aperture and see what happens.
    But a big part of the issue is the additional scaling your images are going through. 720x576 is going to get squished to a letterboxed format that, exlcuding the black bard top and bottom, is less than 350 horizontal lines. That's only 50% of your rez out of Aperture. You'd be far better off providing a more accurate movie out of Aperture that requires less scaling in the encode to MPEG2.
    I do such productions in FCP or Motion, using a timeline setting that corresponds to the finsihed product's needs. Export the rendered movie as self-contained, take that to DVDSP direclty or through Compressor to MPEG2.
    bogiesan

  • Output from fcp to dvd studio 4        sd get bad quality dvd pixelized

    2 hour video 740 x output. tape out looks great looks great but dvd does not. pixalized could not see faces clearly. please suggest
    bit rate one pass or two. on reg. 4.7 dvd-r.
    will use ac3.

    Hi:
    You can use Bitrate Calculator to check the max bitrate. If you use AC3 192 kbps, for 2 hs you can use 486 kbits/s for your video.
    If you want to use a higher bitrate, you must split it in two 4.7 discs or a DL DVD.
    Hope that helps !
      Alberto

  • Bad Quality/ DVD 9?

    Hello!
    I recently finished a project in iMovie and I sent it to iDVD. When I preview the movie in both apps, the video is crystal clear. But when I burn it to a DVD, the video looks terrible. It is pixelated, and dark areas are blocky. Would buring the project to DVD 9 help? Or is it even possible to burn a DVD 9 on a MacBook Pro?
    Thanks in advance!

    A) DVD 9 = Single sided, dual layer disc.
    You can burn a DL disc on a MBP provided you have a DL burner. The 17" comes standard with a DL burner. Or via an external DL burner. The only way to know if that would yield better results is to try. MPEG 2 compression (what any DVD authoring app such as iDVD does) will likely show artifacts is poorly lit areas and scenes with lot's of motion (quick pans & zooms especially). This is a by-product of the way the compression works. There are other DVD authoring tools that I have read provide better results in poorly lit scenes but these will start at several hundred dollars.
    Mike

  • Another one with bad looking text

    Hi!
    I want to place a text in a motion project, but when I increase the size it looks really bad. I think I saw somewhere that you could do something and it behaves more like its vectorbased so it looks sharp what ever the size, but I can't remember where it is. Could someone lead me?
    Thanks so much
    Morten

    Text is a vector operation until you render. In Motion, sometimes when you apply certain effects or convert to 3D with some effects rasterization occurs and you have to read up on that carefully because it's confusing. Sorry, it confuses the heck out of me, maybe you can understand it. If you are brining in bitmapped or rasterized artwork and try to scale it, all you do is make the pixels bigger. Can't tell from your post what you are using for "text."
    bogiesan

  • [solved] gnome-shell bad looking after update

    Hi,
    After update (about two weeks ago) my gnome looks bad. You can see this in screenshots. Very large icons and strange rectangles in gnome shell menu on started applications.
    Can you help?
    Last edited by skoczo (2015-05-01 17:27:23)

    eyemonen wrote:
    Hi
    Desktop icons: open Files (nautilus) and change default zoom level for icons from standard to small (preferences - views).
    Rectangles:  this is how running applications are displayed in the default theme. If those rectangles bother you too much, the easiest way is to change theme. For example, ceti-2 and vertex are already ported to 3.16.
    It works. Thanks for help.

  • Bad Install DVD

    My Leopard Install DVD is bad and I cannot install from the disk. I tried cleaning the DVD media to no avail. Is it possible to get a replacement?

    There are no Apple stores in South Korea, so I guess my option is to try and call Apple support?
    I'm not sure how many localized versions there are of the documentation that comes with the Leopard package, but yours should include some information about your support options. And as I said, contacting the place of purchase may be of some help with this.

  • Bad cd/dvd drive?

    hello,
    have a toshiba a-135 s4656 laptop that doesn't give any error message after burning a disc, but NONE of the discs i have burned will play back on anything. i have gotten it to work correctly once, but the program i used took so long to do it, i can't stand it! took like an hour and twenty minutes to burn a 45min cd!! i have a thread some where on here about it. the drive is a tsst TS-L632d ata device.
    here's the question i'm posting now. was just looking for prices on spare parts at the toshiba site. there is a link to a site for national repair parts and i about freaked when i saw the prices for any of the drives!!
    see attachment for the price list, but does anyone know of a cheaper place to get a cd/dvd drive from, that will work in this thing? never mind on the attachment as jpgs aren't allowed, i guess. how dumb is that?! anyway, the price was like $123!!

    Hello,
    I solved this in my samsung laptop, reinstalling the unit firmware.
    I downloaded it from odd samsung site and despite  firmware unit  was the lastest  version (S04), I reinstalled it. Problem solved.

  • Resolution bad on DVD

    I am a pro photographer and I am burning slideshows for my clients. I am using iPhoto to create the show and then sending the images to iDVD to burn and finalize the DVD. The playback on TV is kind of OK but the playback on the computer is awful. The pictures are blurry. What can I do?
    Why can I go into a video store and rent a movie and it looks great on my TV and on my computer but I can't seem to achieve the same results with my burned DVD's???

    Let me know if any of these are helpful.
    http://www.apple.com/ilife/tutorials/
    http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/imovie06tmm/
    http://www.creativemac.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=66079
    http://www.creativemac.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=67633
    http://www.creativemac.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=29770
    http://www.dvdthemepak.com/idvd.html
    http://creativemac.digitalmedianet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=31388
    http://www.trixsoftware.com/

  • Creating a Professional Looking DVD For Cheap

    Sorry for the newbie question, but I searched the FAQs and didn't find a direct answer to this question, so here I am...
    Basically, I am trying to create a series of baseball DVDs (SD, not HD). These will be updated every 3 months or so. I am also doing the duplication myself for the moment using DVD-R's. I am shooting with a Canon HV-30 in HD.
    Right now I have edited the footage with iMovie and output it with iDVD and the results are just OK. The resolution is a bit degraded and the DVDs are just straight-through auto-plays with no menus. That's OK for version 1.0, but I want the next versions to be more functional.
    I want to create a next version of the DVDs with better resolution (still SD for the moment) and want to know if I should upgrade to the Final Cut Suite to do this. Right now the iMovie/IDVD approach is quite hack-y given that the iMovie to iDVD export route seems to have been deprecated in version 08. However, I don't need to do anything fancy in terms of effects (e.g. iMovie is mostly good enough as an editing suite at the moment).
    Any advice would be appreciated.
    BTW, I am a recent re-convert to the Mac world, so please be gentle.

    Yes, absolutely. FCS will do a much better, higher quality job. But it will only do what you tell it to do. iMovie and iDVD are great for amateurs because they lead you down a path and prevent you from screwing up too bad. FCS gives you total freedom to do what ever you want, but that also means it allows you to create DVDs that do not work at all. The difference is training.
    FCS is a professional level application. You are not going to be able to put together a DVD on your first day of owning it the way you could with iDVD. The manuals that come with FCS are probably thicker than your local phone book. It is going to take a LONG time before you are ready to make your first disc in DVD SP. You should plan on reading through all the manuals… and then getting additional training. Either through third party manuals, training DVDs or actual classroom training.
    Its a LOT of work/training. But in the end you will be able to create much better/higher quality videos than you are creating now.

  • Bad looking text from timeline

    My text suddenly looks bad when I export from the timeline to DV...all other codecs are fine.  I have used Final Cut for years and I don't remember having this problem.  My timelines are usually DV NTSC.  This is very mysterious.  If I choose the option of Quicktime conversion and output in Pro Res, H.264...or anything, it all looks great.  If I choose the Export to Quicktime...or the conversion option using the DV codec, it looks awful. I recently upgraded to FCP 7.  Thanks!

    Export a self-contained movie of a portion of the Timeline that contains some graphics (File->Export->QucikTime Movie).  Open the resulting file in QuickTime Player 7 (located in the Applications/Utilities folder).  While the movie is playing, hit command j to open the movie properties.  Click on the Video Track section and make sure High Quality is checked.
    -DH

  • Any ideas on how to emulate this look (purposely bad looking video)?

    so i'm doing a very short sequence right now, and i thought it would be kind of interesting to have this short sequence have the same characteristics of the video quality of the old early 90s Sega CD based FMV games (for an example, i uploaded a short clip here: http://www.sendspace.com/file/ro17qv ). and there is a LITTLE bit more of a technological explanation here ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMV_game#Description ) in the 3rd paragraph. from reading from here ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_cd#Reception ) it would seem the video quality may have been better, natively on the disc, but the system itself could not actually interpret that quality of video. (i had alwasy just assuned it was compression artifacts to cram a 90 minute full motion game onto a proprietary 500mb cd-rom disc... but that may still have something to do with it) or maybe they just encoded the video liek that, knowing the console couldnt do it anyway, and being more mindful of bit-budgeting.
    so, is there anyway to really emulate that look? i tried encodeing a simple mpeg at 1 mbps, but it just made it more pixelated... didnt quite give it the grainy factor, charecterisic of dithering (which i was looking to see if there was just a simple color dither filter where i could limit it to the sega cd color threshold, but no luck on my part), nore the washed out colors i was looking for. i tried adding some noise... but then the grain was just random. where as in the games, the grain was more stagnate. (ie, the camera may pan, but you could still see the grain in the exact same place on the screen)
    or is this just something that was inherent to the hardware, and no real way to fully emulate it without said hardware?

    I'd experiment with Posterize Time to get the low-frame rate look; seems that most of the CD-ROM games with video had frame rates of around 10-12 fps. Posterize Time will let you achieve that pretty easily.
    Instead of Noise, try Mosaic with the block count sent relatively high. Use Posterize to create the color banding. You might have to experiment with the order of the effects, and also the level to which they are applied. A color correction effect as the last step would be necessary to get the desaturation you're probably looking for.
    Another quick-and-dirty way would be to export your sequence using Microsoft AVI as your Format, with Microsoft Video 1 or Microsoft RLE as your codec. For MS Video 1, click Codec Settings and turn the "Temporal Quality Ratio" down a bit, and for both codecs, decrease the Quality slider. Set your export frame rate to something that is 1/2 to 1/3 of your original sequence frame rate. That should create a pretty schmeggy looking file Again, mix-and-match to get your desired look, but this might be the easiest way to do this--these videos would have used codecs like this (Cinepak was popular, too).

Maybe you are looking for

  • URGENT -----  Problem in converting spool to pdf .

    Error - File cannot be opened because of no pages ...... Hi experts, I am passing internal table contents to spool   -->  then spool to pdf  - >  then mail sending. Everything is fine but only error is in the receiving mail the above error is coming.

  • PI 7.0 Hardware Requirements & Confirguration

    Hello, We are planning to install PI 7.0 on the AIX 5.3.x(64 bit) with database DB2 UDB 8.2.x.(64 bit) for a Sandbox environment. I am new to the XI area. I need some small/detailed information regarding following requirements( from PI BASIS point of

  • Activities are not displayed in 2007

    Hi Gurus, We upgraded from 5.0 to 2007. Activity Categories/Types created in 5.0 are not visible in 2007. Could you kindly let me know how to activate the visibility of Activities in 2007.. Thanks in advance, points will be rewarded... Best Regards,

  • Outputting Multi-Channel audio to DA-88

    I am trying to layback 8 channels of audio to a DA-88. I am sending 8 channels of AES out of my Multibridge extreme to a IF88-AE AES to TDIF converter that feeds the DA-88 deck. I am able to see the audio on all 8 channels of the DA-88 deck when play

  • ABAP Methods _ 50 lines of code or less recommendation

    Hi, I'm looking for a document that I recall seeing that recommends that an ABAP method should have only around 50 lines of code. Can anyone recall this document and where to get it? Not sure if it was a blog or pdf paper by someone. Thanks, Ken Murr