Bad movie quality

Dear All;
When i mport an swf movie file into a slide presentation the
quality get too bad, Laabels flickering , the whole screen
flickering .
any solution too this problem is highly appreciated.
Thank you

Publish and Test-Movie are the same command.
A published Flash file is the SWF.
Open the SWF that you are importing outside of Flash. If the
quality looks good there, then the problem is on import. If the
quality is bad there, then the SWF needs to be re-published with
higher quality settings.
One thing to note. If you haven't published the slide-show
with the imported SWF, then you may not be viewing the SWF the way
it will be in the end. The Flash authoring tool often displays
objects at a lower resolution for processing speed. To check final
resolution, publish the slideshow SWF. You may find that the
quality issues disappear on publish.

Similar Messages

Bad movie quality using iDVD

do i need to create a quicktime movie in FCE HD in order to get my movie into iDVD? in the tutorial video i used to learn FCEHD, the guy simply imported his FCE file into iDVD. What is the best way to get the best quality movie using iDVD? What do the settings need to be? my movie is about an hour long fyi.

Yes, you do need to export it as a QT File. Hopefully the file is located on your main HD /boot volume.
Assuming your movie also has chapter markers, export to Quicktime for iDVD, pick only Chapter Markers from the Markers choices. Like this:
Click Here:

Still bad video quality

even is catalyst cs 5.5 two of my problems do not resolve.
bad video quality in fullscreen. i have some videos for offline view (768x576 @ 2600 kbps) but still fullscreen view is messed up, all blocky, not proper video interpolation. in vlc or any other player the flv file looks fine!
the videos also have a 4:3 ratio and show white borders in fullscreen on a 16:9 screen in letterbox, how can make the borders black?
is there any solution?

Hi
as example
Creating a PAL movie in iMovie HD 6 then import this into a NTSC iDVD project
• Works but with a losy quality
I do use JESDeinterlacer3.2.2 and let this do the PAL to NTSC conversion
Now burned as an NTSC iDVD project
• Best result possibly without buying PRO-applications for $$$$$$$
This way should work the other way around too.
Most modern PAL DVD-players can playback NTSC (if TV is old in Bl/W)
Most modern NTSC DVD-players can't playback PAL
If playbacked on a Mac PAL or NTSC is of no interest.
Yours Bengt W

PE 7 with Canon 5D Mark II - bad slowmotion quality

Hi,
I've used the trial version for some days now to set up a video with shots from my Canon 5D Mark II.
I want the video clips to play in slowmotion so I've set the speed to 50%.
When I render the video I get bad quite quality (jagged playing) and I want it to be smooth.
Does anyone know if this is a know problem and could be solved in any way in PE 7?
If not, will it be the same problem in Premiere Pro version or does this version have a lot better render quality?
Thanks!

Welcome to the forum.
There are a couple of articles on this forum on "Canon 5D MK II" footage, and many more on the PrPro forum. Pay special attention to links to other articles and also comments from Jeff Bellune, a noted author and Community Expert. While I do not recall "slow motion" being discussed, there is much discussion on the .MOV files from that camera.
The Adobe fora allow one to search by both Subject and by People.
If I find some of the links, I will post them here.
Good luck, and have you done a Render (hit the Enter key) to Preview in the best form possible?
Hunt

Bad overall quality

Hello,
In the last few years, Nokia dramatically decreased the quality of its products. I know of 4 people that bought a Nokia phone in the last 18 months, all of them had to be returned already in the warranty period:
Two Nokia 6110 Navigators: one had a micophone that didnt work anymore overnight, the second was unable to chrge after a few months and the camera wasnt working anymore (screws had to be tightened to fix the camera). On Nokia 6110 Navigator, you also notice the bad building-quality, as you can move the slider, even while closed, at about 2 millimeters, on both phones in same direction. (from beginning!) A known issue.
Thrid phone: a Nokia 3120classic, bought 3 months ago, now speaker not working anymore, phone did never fall down.
Fourth phone: a Nokia 6220classic: tried a firmwareupdate and crashed during the update, had to be returned to Nokia Service Center. curently Nokia is investigating these problems with 6220classic and N82.
Besides the bad quality of the hardware, the firmware/software also got so many bugs. On Nokia 6110 Navigator there are so many known bugs, at the beginning (for a whole year!) there were so many obvious bugs (even the daily alarm-clock didnt work correctly!) that we have to wonder whether this phone was ever tested by anyone at Nokia. Nowadays we got used to the remaining bugs, that are also partly in 6210 Navigator and a few of them are all on Symbian-OS60-Phones. As there are tons of bugs on 6220classic too, if you try to update your phone, it is a really big "chance" to get a broken phone.
Great thing, isn't it? The bad quality keeps ongoing on the new products, if you read some reviews of the newest Nokia phones. No wonder, as phones that are soon 2 years old, still got so many (partly obvious) bugs, how could a new phone work the way it should? And the hardwarequality rarely improves if you build the phones in countries in cheaper, eastern countries...

Quoting: mccbleues answer to something i didnt mention:
The old "I never allowed my phone to get wet" story is very, very tired. All Nokia phones have a label inside (in some models, it is visible in the battery compartment, in others it is completely insude) which changes colour when exposed to sufficient watre to cause damage to the phone. No warranty repair rejected for water damage is a guess, it is a water-tight case with strong evidence against the owner.
As for dust getting in, this again comesdown to the phone being somewhere where there is a lot of dust. It has to come from sowmewhere, I and stand by my statement that these modern phones are sophisitcated devices not Fisher-Price toys, if a phone is left fumbling around in a pocket or handbag, or accompanying its owner in a dirty environment, it is susceptible to problems.
Answer from me: Sorry, but do you read what I have written? Obviously not, as all of the phones got repaired for free during warrantyperiod, as Nokia saw that for example there was nothing broken due to water getting inside or dust, or whatever,all had defects caused by bad quality or assembling. Anyway, the problems were not at all related to this kind of things, and I simply mentioned that the phones were always kept in save places, to show you, that it WAS not the customers fault. All 5 phones got therefore repaired for free. I am not complaing about their reparation, because that is OK, Nokia service centers are doing a good job.
The fact is, that I wonder how this can happen, and about the quality of the phones from the beginning on, so i notice a very high number of phones getting broken just due to bad quality of hardware or other technical problems that occur. Even if you might purchse the phone, and only leave the phone turned on and charge every time the battery gets low, without touching it or using it, it might get broken. The Nokia 6110 Navigator that got broken over night (microphone) while lying on a table at around 20degree celsius is such an example. How can this happen? I thought it was impossible to happen, but it happened.
This is definitily a result of bad quality, and not of customers usage-behaviour.
Message Edited by laxlex on 25-Jan-2009 12:49 PM

Is it possible to get a refund if i bought an album with extremely bad sound quality?

As asked in the title, is it possible to get a refund if i bought an album with extremely bad sound quality?
I am very unsatisfied with my latest purchase of the album "Never take ffriendship personal" by "Anberlin" ...
I can find all the songs in much better quality, even on YouTube ...
I bought two other albums by Anberlin at the same time, on which the sound quality is much much better and perfectly clear.
is it possible to get some sort of refund ???

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1933
Regards.

10.6.2: Bad image quality with SIPS

I used to convert my PDF documents with SIPS like this:
/usr/bin/sips --setProperty format jpeg --setProperty formatOptions high -z 400 200 sourcefilename.pdf --out targetfilename.jpg
This results in a very bad image quality after updating to 10.6.2 (the text contained in the source pdf file is nearly unreadable in the resulting image, especially when using the -z attribute for downsizing).
I could reconstruct this behaviour with several machines today: when using 10.6.1 the quality is fine, but after the update to 10.6.2 the resulting image quality is unacceptable.
Any ideas? Or could this be a bug? The man page for sips does not contain any information about new parameters and the image quality for other target formats (tif, png, ...) seems to be ok.

That picture looks like it was taken in a dimly lit room.
You could try using night mode but you will need a very steady hand.
Most basic phone cameras just cannot produce good pictures indoors when not in brightly lit areas. LED flashes just cannot do a good enough job when compared to real cameras.
Megapixels don't equal quality, it's the lens and flash that make the biggest difference.

Can't add movie file / bad movie atom error

Hello,
I'm having a very strange problem. I just started within the last few days trying to organize an Itunes movie database so that I could see all of my movies streamed over my Apple TV. Most of the movie files I have been able to add with no issue, aside from the fact that they always initially get added to the "Home Movies" folder and then I have to move them into the other movie category. So then I come to one of my files which is a rip of one of my BluRay movies. It is in MP4 format, so that should be no issue. I was initially able to add the movie, and it did appear in the Itunes Home Movies section. But I didn't like the way the file was named, and I wanted to add the poster art. I right clicked and went to change what I wanted, the first being the name of the movie. Well prior to me changing the name of the movie, I had the tab option where you could add the movie art. As soon as I changed the file name, that tab went away. Well, I figured maybe I should delete the movie out of the Itunes database and try to re-add it.
Well from this point it's been downhill. Every time I try to add the file back in, it won't appear in Itunes. I then tried playing the file in VLC player, and the file appears to open, and the ticker is moving along, but there is no video or sound. Now this file played just fine before I tried to move it to Itunes. I then tried playing it via Quicktime and I get some weird -2002 bad movie atom error. What the heck is going on! I have searched the net on this error, and the fixes seem to be all over the place, and none of them have worked for me. One thread talked about the tags somehow being changed, but I cannot figure out what tags people are talking about or how to fix this. If anyone has a solution to this I would greatly appreciate that. thanks.

It is against the rules of the forum to discuss extracting from film blu rays. Blu rays used for data storage fine.
I am sure there are plenty of sites out there that can advise on the correct steps to take here.

Removed an edited folder from Catalog - Bad move?

I have searched the forum for a specific answer, but I either overlooked it or failed to enter the exact search terms I needed....
I removed a folder of 173 edited DNG's from the Catalog. Don't ask why!
Am I correct in assuming that all of the presets/adjustments for those files are permanently gone? It appears that they are. - At least I had already exported all as full res JPGs!
Please correct me if I am wrong with this statement:
In order to preserve presets/adjustment applied to any image file in Lightroom, the files MUST remain in the Catalog. Yes or No?
This is an awesome program & there is much more I have to learn - sometimes the hard way.

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}Seven_D wrote:
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
PhotoGAP wrote:
You didn't say specifically... but did you try to re-import some of those images back into LR? Depending on your LR catalog settings, your edits may still be there. If you looked at the DNG in another viewer, then it's possible that you would not have seen your edits. Be sure to check them again with LR if you haven't done so already.
In the post above, johnbeardy states how you can manually save your LR edits into the DNG files, so all is not lost when images are removed from the LR catalog. Another method is in the LR catalog settings, as I mentioned above. Look under Edit>Catalog Settings>Metadata tab and see if the option "Automatically write changes into XMP" is checked. If it is, then again, your edit settings were likely saved to the DNG files, and your losses are minimized. Checking this option creates a performance hit for some folks, but it sure can save a lot of work.
I did re-import the DNG files. I was going to write - "from the original folder" - but now I may (too many senior moments) have moved the DNGs to another folder after exporting the edits as JPGs.. I did not use LR to move them - another bad move!? Anyway, after re-importing the DNGs, the original edits I performed were gone.
Thanks for the tip about the Catalogue settings - I have now checked that box. Does this mean that all editing info for each DNG will now be part of the file - no matter where I move it - or how it is moved (ie - via LR, Windows, or any other program)? I'll have do an experiment to check this myself.
Thanks to everyone for your help/suggestions. Especially to PhotoGAP for the tip on "Automatically write changes into XMP" in the Catalogue Settings.
After making your suggested change in Catalogue Settings, I imported one DNG from the folder, edited it, but did not export. I then removed that folder from the LR Catalogue. When I re-imported the DNG, all edit settings had been saved. I also copied & then renamed the DNG to another folder via Windows. When I imported the copied file, all edit settings were still there.
This is a relief! I will try to get accustomed to moving/creating new folders in LR, but it is good to know that valuable editing time will not be lost if I don't.
Thanks much!

5800 Really Bad build quality

Well I am now on my 3rd 5800 and they all seem to have really bad build quality. As others have mentioned there is a big gap along one side of the phone (top right hand side running down past the volume buttons) and in the dark light leaks out through the gap
Come on - how can anything like this be put out to the general public - this is a serious issue. If you can get one side of the phone to close properly then why didn't you get the other side to do the same?
As a product designer I know that during the design stage there are several prototypes made, parts checked etc - how could this be passed as ok?
I am seriously considering ditching the 5800 all together - for something that Nokia are classing as a premium model they really need to re-consider its quality.

This is really annoying me as well. This phone cost me a lot of money and it's the worst build quality/design I've ever seen.
People talk about dust getting in through the gap but what worries me is that it is much more likely to let in moisture! I've checked with Vodafone and moisture damage is NOT covered by their warranty. So unless Nokia admit that it's a manufacturing fault you'll have to pay for the repair youself.
Of course,
1) If their wasn't a gap down the side of the case water wouldn't get in so it wouldn't need repairing!
2) If the phone gets water damaged it's almost certainly going to be classified as "beyond economical repair"!
Come on Nokia, admit it's a manufacturing fault, recall all the phones and repair them free of charge.
Message Edited by colin5800 on 09-Mar-2009 05:50 PM

Windows Xp bad sound quality after installing itunes 10.5

After installing itunes 10.5 to be able to get the ios5 update my itunes plays every file with really bad, distorted quality. I try other players even Quicktime works fine. What could be happening?

Try to download, and install the latest Realtek HD Audio driver.
Here is the download link:
http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/
Select the second options (High Definition Audio Codecs (Software))
And when you install this, i think everything will be good.

Hp Deskjet Ink Advantage 2060 All-in-One K110 series Bad Print Quality

Hi! I am an avid fan of Hp printers since I was a kid. It is the family's most trusted brand for printers. Our printer worked just fine until I printed a colored page. When printing an all black page, the print is ok. For the colored output, the picture has some shadow/3D effect in it that I can't understand. It makes the picture unrecognizable. I tried troubleshooting but doesn't work. I am using Windows 8 and have been searching the net for solutions and etc but could not find one. I wanted to print an alignment page, clean the cartridges and stuff but could not find the Solution Center just like in Windows 7. Please help me. I badly need it. I have an important document that needs to be printed. My future depends on this one, literally. So please help me. I am begging you. T_T

Hello I_Am_Lost, Welcome to the HP Forums. I see that you are having an issue when attempting to print due to bad print quality. I do have a few suggestions that we can try in the attempt to resolve this issue. First off, please make sure that you have the printer power cable connected directly to a wall outlet and not a power bar/strip. Here is a document that uses a LaserJet printer as an example but it is meant for HP products in general. Please click on the following link that explains the Issues when Connected to an Uninterruptible Power Supply/Power Strip/Surge Protector. I have also located a troubleshooting document that deals with HP Deskjet Ink Advantage 2060 (K110a) All-in-One Printer - Troubleshooting Print Quality Issues. If the troubleshooting does not help resolve your issue, I would then suggest contacting HP's Technical Support to see about further options for you. , : click here. Thanks for your time. Cheers,

IMovie 08 degrades movie quality

When I open iMovie, my camera (JCV MG130) is detected and the movies are being imported into the iMovie library. So far things couldn't be better! However, when I export a movie clip to a file using "Share" -> "Export To Movie" and "Large 960x540" resolution, the picture quality of the exported movie is clearly degraded compared to the original file that was downloaded from the camera.
*Does iMovie have a loss-less export function?*
Additional comment:
Overall, my experience with iMovie 08 (and iDVD 08) on my Leopard MacBook Pro is mixed. Great idea, but too many short comings. Example: when I want to create a DVD, I need to import/edit/export a movie in iMovie, then I need to import that movie file into iDVD (if I just open iDVD and load an iMovie project, iDVD crashes). This adds an additional step and it takes twice as long to render a movie (1/2hr clips takes 1 hr to render to file in iMovie, another hour to burn the movie to a DVD using iDVD). Clearly, this should be ONE step. If I want to index the movie, I have to import/export using Garageband, etc. In addition with the degradation of the movie quality as discussed above, I think iMovie and iDVD are more toys than serious applications. I would have expected more from Apple, to be honest.

When I open iMovie, my camera (JCV MG130) is detected and the movies are being imported into the iMovie library. So far things couldn't be better! However, when I export a movie clip to a file using "Share" -> "Export To Movie" and "Large 960x540" resolution, the picture quality of the exported movie is clearly degraded compared to the original file that was downloaded from the camera.
According to what I read concerning this model, it is a "Standard Definition" HDD camcorder. You should expect such degradation when sharing/exporting SD content at HD resolutions. This is the same as taking a 640x480 JPEG photo and enlarging it to 960x540, printing, and then comparing your output quality with that of your original picture. Enlarging the frame size in iMovie does not add resolution detail that did not exist in your original source file.
Does iMovie have a loss-less export function?
No. Unlike earlier versions of iMovie, the source files (in all of their various possible compression formats) are never stored as physical clip. Instead, all content remains in its original form and is manipulated "by reference" as you assemble and edit your project and is rendered in "real time" for previewing (which is why iMovie '08 has such high CPU speed requirements). No physical file is actually created until to share/export the file and at that time all of the various possible forms of content are rendered/converted to a single compression output format preprogrammed by the application or as selected by the user. It is very likely that the "reference movie" approach used by previous versions of iMovie had to be abandoned in order to make the process more universal for all source formats iMovie is now "theoretically" able to import. Think of the time base problems created when importing MPEG-2 camcorder content which has to have separate time bases and offsets for the video to synchronize it with AC3 audio which has been converted to AIFF. Now multiply this problem for each and every track simultaneously under the "playhead" at any given instant in the timeline. On the other hand, GarageBand does have a "Full Quality" option that allows you to export your video unchanged from when it was received by GarageBand and with either the original or AIFF (iDVD "ready") edited format to disk or to iDVD for the same automatic iDVD operations you formerly enjoyed with iMovie '06.
Example: when I want to create a DVD, I need to import/edit/export a movie in iMovie, then I need to import that movie file into iDVD (if I just open iDVD and load an iMovie project, iDVD crashes).
iDVD is not designed to handle iMovie "Projects." An iMovie "Project" is little more than a text file listing the particular ranges of audio and video source frames, text representing titles/instructions for displaying them, and a list of transitions also mapped to a combination of applied effects and a ranges of source audio and video frames to which they are applied, etc. while iDVD is only designed to handle physical audio/video compressed data.
This adds an additional step and it takes twice as long to render a movie (1/2hr clips takes 1 hr to render to file in iMovie, another hour to burn the movie to a DVD using iDVD). Clearly, this should be ONE step. If I want to index the movie, I have to import/export using Garageband, etc.
The "extra" step is required to transform the "text" description of the iMovie project into a physical audio/video file which iDVD can handle. In actuality, there is little time difference between iMovie '08 and previous versions. Previous versions of iMovie required you to wait while each non-editable file was converted as part of the import process. In addition, you had to wait while each title, transition, or special effect was rendered to a physical file during the editing process. What iMovie '08 actually does is consolidate all of this instances of waiting for the various conversions, rendering, and creation of various small files into the conversion and creation of a single long file where all of your waiting is consolidated into one long period rather than all of those old short ones. Stepwise, it was never done in "ONE step." As to the use of GarageBand as a separate application, I see little difference in using it separately for the chaptering and blending/mixing/synchronization of audio and video content and the use of iDVD as a separate application for the authoring and burning of DVDs. You don't hear many complaints about this being done in a separate application.
In addition with the degradation of the movie quality as discussed above, I think iMovie and iDVD are more toys than serious applications.
IMHO, if you elect to "play" with these applications and not use them as they were intended or to their full capacity, then "Yes," they are little more than toys.

6120c with 3.83 producing bad sound quality !

hi i got a new 6120c few days back and currently i have 3.83 V firmware , i am experiencing very bad mp3 quality when ever i use supplied head set which is HS47, that sound quality is below average or may be my phone is producing just mono not sure about it ... is nokia planning to come up with any new firmware for 6120c???
can we rollback its current firmware 3.83 to the orignal and older one which i think was 3.41 ????
thanks

Hi, did you use the Music Transfer application from Nokia PC Suite to transfer your mp3 files to the phone? If yes, probably your files were converted to .aac format to decrease file size and probably they lost some quality. This happened to me before. So I just used File Manager from Nokia PC Suite to copy my mp3 files from the PC to the phone's memory card as they are, without any conversion. This procedure solved the sound quality issues for me.

Top Rated Members A Bad Move

I think seeing top rated members per forum is a bad move.
It is far more useful for the new users of Apple Forums and old alike to have Top Rated Posts listed rather than Top Rated Members. What good is it for a user seeking help in the forums to see a list of members, its only purpose could be to click the membernames to send fan-boy mail. A lits of most popular posts would help a user find the current issues of large that could solve his or her problems with their Apple product.
Apple Forums never was a place encouraging showmanship, and now would be a bad time to start. We already have the User Level system to handle any reward system for those who post.
If anything least move the most popular posts above the top rated members list.
Jan J.

The numbers listed next to the users name is not
posts, it is points. You can only get points if you
answered a question with a solution or a helpful
answer and the original poster of the question, gives
you a helpful (5 points) or solved (10 points)
this definition is correct for new users, but someone who now has, say, 40,000 points, is likely to be someone who just made around 20,000 posts under the old system (the new totals look like the values i'd expect from previous number of posts plus previous number of points)
clearly none of us old users can justly claim we got our points under anything resembling the current definition
maybe it's time to just reset everyone to zero

Bad movie quality

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for