Bad performance video in on vivo card?

This opinion posted as a reply in other thread. But because I think It is proper to be an issue for discussion
I am posting in a new thread. Let alone the difficulty in configuration, the vivo of this card seems to have a poor performance.
I too have a GeForce 4 Ti4200-VTD8X-8894 AGP 8X 128MB.
Vidio in working in a machine, but not in other machine.
I also have a ati tv wonder pci, The configurations of the capture driver on both machine appeares to be the same but behave differently, which I don't know why at all.
What I've found so far :
1. For tv(videoin) decoding: dscaler1.7(alpha) works on both machine(but on bad one freezes often)
2. On the bad machine using any capture driver causes pending (ie. in windows movie maker or virtual dub), drivers(1.27 or 1.22) have the same behavior.
3. While comparing the performance of tv decoding, I found a big issue. Tvwonder was very vivid on screen and the cpu usage was only 8% while vivo was very rough(skipping, ...) and the cpu load was over 60%.
So the conclusion?
The tv in of this card is only for the poor. If you can bear the poor performanc, you can spend lots of time to enable it and get bad performance. I'd rather buy a h/w decoding tv card for $30 or more. With amd xp 2.1G, and Tvwonder and window media encoder, I was able to broadcast to 1.5g bandwidth of video quality while watching the movie on Window media player on the same machine. The cpu usage was around 80%. But with this card, I cannot dream of it at all.
It is said that this card has bt848 decoder(So can be played using dscaler1.7). Then how come this card be so slow on decoding? Bad configuration? Possibly. If anyone who could watch tv(through vcr) fast enough with low cpu usage, please let me know the secret.

I started again from scratch (3:th time), installed win98 on a clean HD and installed the vga driver from the cd in the box. Then I installed Winproducer from the cd, but the capture program I have to browse on the cd to install. The capture seems to work now, but I can not save my recording from my camcorder, some error message is poping up and the same message is when I tried to play the saved file (there is a saved file anyway).
I have problem whith my network card also byt only in win98, complaining about ndis.vxd (can´t load ndis.vxd).
So I have to install W2000 to get internet.
When I installed the Winproducer on W2000 the computer rebooted all the time, is Winproducer not compatible whith W2000 ??
I have not downloded anything yet (se abow).
And where can I find this 28.32 or 29.42 ?
WDM, I have installed this time.
Thanks NE

Similar Messages

  • Where did 30GB of unused space on my SSD main drive go?  I have a mid 2011 iMac that until yesterday had just 54GB of space occupied on the primary drive.  I imported 45 minutes of video from an SD card.  Could that have used up the space?

    Where did 30GB of unused space on my SSD main drive go?  I have a mid 2011 iMac that until yesterday had just 54GB of space occupied on the primary drive.  I imported 45 minutes of video from an SD card.  Could that have used up the space?

    I added an SSD to my 27" 2011 iMac.  Although Sahidus is absolutely correct, it is much easier to add an SSD replacing the optical drive, it wasn't that bad to add it using an entirely seperate cable using SATA-III.  To me it is worth the extra hassle to install a SATA-III SSD.  This is where you are going to get maximum performance.
    Although it appears complicated, if you go slow, the procedure to install an SSD drive isn't too bad.  It takes at most 3 hours, as long as you are prepared and have all the parts and tools.
    http://www.btobey.com/learn/imac-ssd-install.php
    This describes how I did it.  Now I get awesome data performance from my iMac!
    I think the 21.5" may be more difficult to find where to place the SSD.  But im sure it is possible.  Just be creative.

  • Bad performance quadro 4800 and premiere pro

    Could someone please help me understand if somethings wrong with my settings or if my 4800 is defected?
    I run OSX Lion 10.7.2 and have the quadro fx 4800 installed in a:
    Mac Pro 4,1
    2 x 2.93Ghz Quad-core Intel Xeon
    12GB of Ram
    with two additional Geforce GT 120 installed too.
    the latest drivers for the 4800
    GPU driver version: 7.12.9 270.05.10f03
    CUDA driver version: 4.0.50
    I run Premiere 5.5.2 and have tested the performance with the two different settings:
    Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration
    Mercury Playback Engine Software Only
    I did this test because I didn’t feel my 4800 did the work I’ve read everywhere it should. Adding simple text titles to AVCHD footage made my playback drop frames.
    Anyhow, I tested my machine with 1920x1080 AVCHD and added video layers until I started to see stutter during playback. First with “Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration”. With 14 video layers sized down so you could see them all beside one another playback started to drop frames. The yellow line was still yellow in the top of the timeline. Shouldn’t it turn red if the footage needs rendering?
    I then switched to “Mercury Playback Engine Software Only” and the yellow line turned red. The strange thing is that when I played back the same 14 layers of video the dropped frames where gone!! Isn’t this beyond strange??? Shouldn’t everything run more smooth with the “Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration”?
    Has it got anything to do with my Geforce GT 120 installed? Should I get rid of those? My two 24 inch apple displays are both connected to the 4800.
    PLEASE help me or redirect me to some good forums!

    After testing final cut (which I love) and Premiere back and forth with the exact same media I notice that editing prores in Final cut is the best when it comes to just edit the film. Sure Premiere does take native MTS files but what good is this when it doesn't run fluidly? Comparing playback and editing with prores in Final Cut and Premiere makes me realize that on my computer, don't ask me why, a rendered sequence with prores material in Premiere is far more jerky than a sequence with prores that "do not need render" in Final cut. Shouldn't they be the same?? Movements like camera pans that originally were shot really smoothly isn't as smooth as they should be playing back in premiere (and yes I know I got the right sequence settings and all). Final cut however gives me what I want.
    To me it all comes down to how good the editing App presents what you currently are editing. Adobe has many advantages with the dynamic link and so on but playback is a such an important part of editing!! Has anyone got the same problem with "not as smooth playback as you would really want" even though the sequence is rendered displaying a green line??
    Thanks for the links lasvideo but I practically read every article there is about CUDA, premiere and mercury playback engine already.
    Anyone knows anything about Adobe CS 6 release dates?
    12 dec 2011 kl. 22:03 skrev lasvideo:
    Re: bad performance quadro 4800 and premiere pro
    created by lasvideo in Premiere Pro CS5 & CS5.5 - View the full discussion
    Some answers for you right from the horses mouth 
    http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/cuda-mercury-playba ck-engine-and-adobe-premiere-pro.html
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/3804386#3804386
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere/faq_list
    Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4079978#4079978
    To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4079978#4079978. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
    Start a new discussion in Premiere Pro CS5 & CS5.5 by email or at Adobe Forums
    For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

  • How do I upload videos from an SD card to the movies folder in Finder on my iMac?

    I'm having trouble uploading videos from my SD card to my iMac. I'm wanting to save it in the "Movies" folder in Finder. When I open the SD card on my iMac, I am able to view the videos in QuickTime Player. They were an AVCHD file format. It gave me no option of saving the videos - not even with dragging them. So, I tried moving all of the files versus just one (in other words, instead of opening the file to view all of the videos, I just dragged the whole file without opening it).  It saved to my iMac, but in the same way as it was on the SD card - I wasn't able to actually save the videos themselves. They were only able to be viewed with QuickTime Player - I couldn't do anything else with them. So, I took my SD card out of the computer and put it back in the video camera. I then realized than I could not view the videos in the camera - they wouldn't show up. I then plugged the SD card back into the iMac. The videos were now saved under a BDMV folder versus the AVCHD folder they had been under earlier. The AVCHD folder was there, but would not open. When I tried to open it, all it said was, "This operation could not be completed." The BDMV folder allows me to view the videos in QuickTime Player, but I still cannot save them to my iMac from the SD card. I even tried saving the videos to iPhoto by dragging the BDMV folder into iPhoto. All it did was say, "The following files could not be imported. The file is in an unrecognizable format." So, now, I am completely confused as to what I need to do as to save the videos onto my computer, and even how the videos are now saved under a BDMV folder versus the original AVCHD folder in the SD card. I'd greatly appreciate it if someone could help me with this problem. Thanks!

    You should have an icon of the SD card on the desktop - do you? If not, go to Finder Preferences > General and make sure these items are checked to show:
    Once the icon is showing, you can just drag the card content to your desktop. It depends on what you want to do with the video - just watch or edit in iMovie to share online or burn a DVD?

  • CMP 6.1 Entity bad performance.

    I'am using entity 1.1 EJB on WL 6.1 and facing very bad performances:
    around 150ms for an insert (i have 20 columns).
    When accessing an order interface to read 2 fields in a session bean method: around
    90 ms.
    I'am very disapointed and confused. What should I look up for
    to increase the performance ? Any important tuning or parameters ? Should I use EJB
    2.0 to have significant perf ?
    Thanks for any advice because we are thinking to switch all the application on stored
    procedures. A solution without Entity and fewer stateless session beans.
    My config:
    WL: 6.1 on Sun sparc
    SGBD: Sybase
    Entity: WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB 1.1 RDBMS (weblogic-rdbms11-persistence-600.dtd)
    Thanks

    Historically its hard to get good performance & scalability out of sybase
    without using stored procs. Using dynamic sql on sybase just doesnt do as
    well as procs. Oracle on the other hand can get very close to stored proc
    speed out of well written dynamic sql.
    As far as weblogic goes, my experience is the focus of their testing for db
    related stuff is Oracle, then DB2, then MSSQLServer. Sybase is usually last
    on the list.
    As far as the 6.1 cmp, haven't used it much, but because of these other
    things I would be cautious about using it with Sybase.
    Joel
    "Antoine Bas" <[email protected],> wrote in message
    news:3cc7cdcf$[email protected]..
    >
    I'am using entity 1.1 EJB on WL 6.1 and facing very bad performances:
    around 150ms for an insert (i have 20 columns).
    When accessing an order interface to read 2 fields in a session beanmethod: around
    90 ms.
    I'am very disapointed and confused. What should I look up for
    to increase the performance ? Any important tuning or parameters ? ShouldI use EJB
    2.0 to have significant perf ?
    Thanks for any advice because we are thinking to switch all theapplication on stored
    procedures. A solution without Entity and fewer stateless session beans.
    My config:
    WL: 6.1 on Sun sparc
    SGBD: Sybase
    Entity: WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB 1.1 RDBMS(weblogic-rdbms11-persistence-600.dtd)
    >
    Thanks

  • Bad performance when open a bi publisher report in excel

    We use bi publisher(xml publisher) to create a customized report. For a small report, user like it very much. But for a bigger report, users complain about the performance when they open the file.
    I know it is not a native excel file, that may cause the bad performance. So I ask my user to save it to a new file as a native excel format. The new file still worse than a normal excel file when we open it.
    I did a test. We try to save a bi publish report to excel format, the size shrink to 4Mb. But if we "copy all" and "Paste Special" value only to a new excel file, the size is only 1Mb.
    Do I have any way to improve that, users are complaining everyday. Thanks!
    I did a test today.
    I create a test report
    Test 1: Original file from BIP in EBS is 10Mb. We save it in my local disk, when we open the file, it takes 43 sec.
    Test 2: We save the file in native excel format, the file size is 2.28Mb, it takes 7 sec. to open.
    Test 3: We copy all cell and "PasteSpecial" to a new excel file with value only. The file size is 1.66Mb, it takes only 1 sec to open.
    Edited by: Rex Lin on 2010/3/31 下午 11:26

    EBS or Standalone BIP?
    If EBS see this thread for suggestions on performance tuning and hints and tips:
    EBS BIP Performance Tuning - Definitive Guide?
    Note also that I did end up rewriting my report as PL/SQL producing a csv file and have done with several large reports in BIP on EBS.
    Cheers,
    Dave

  • Photoshop Elements 9 Downloader crash with video clips on memory card

    I have a Canon SX30IS. When I use PSE9 to download from memory card, if there are any videos present on the card, the Photo Downloader crashes.
    I believe that it is something to do with Apple Quicktime. When I uninstall Quicktime , PSE downloader does not crash while importing media form this camera,  but cannot play video clips. On reinstalling Quicktime , the PSE downloader crashes while searching the memory card for media.
    I have not upgraded PSE twice now because of this crash. What makes it worse is that Apple Quicktime is a very poor media player, managing about 2FPS on the video clips from this camera when both the Canon and the VLC video codecs can manage 30FPS.
    I would much prefer if I could choose to use a video renderer, like using any available Windows codecs rather than insisting on using annoying Apple software.
    Mike

    Please let  me know the mode in which camera/card reader is connected to the system (USB/PTP/MTP). This can be determined from camera.
    Please try to follow:
    1. Navigate to: C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Elements 9 Organizer\PhotoDownloader.exe.
    2. Right click on 'PhotoDownloader.exe' and select 'Properties'.
    3. Naviage to 'compatability' tab and click on 'Run this program in comptability mode for' and select 'win xp service pack 3'.
    4. In the same dialog, click on 'Run this program as an admin' under 'privelage level'.
    5. Now run the: C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Elements 9 Organizer\PhotoshopElementsOrganizer.exe as an administrator.
    Please let me know if you face any issues in following the steps.
    ~Surendra

  • Can I capture the video from the TV card or video capture card to publish

    Can I capture the video from the TV card or video capture card to publish?
    I tried to use the USB camera, it's OK. But, will the TV card or video capture card also work?

    Hi,
    iChat will set up a Video chat window that takes in to account your Processor speed and Internet Speed and to some extent the Buddy's speed.
    This then denotes the pixel content of each frame.
    OS X 10.6.x tells me this is iChat 5 which in turn mean you have  at least an Intel Core 2 Duo Processor.
    This should be capable of 30 frames a sec at  about 640 X 480 pixels  (Check the Connection Doctor (Video Menu) and the Statistics tab during a Chat).
    iChat 5 cannot do HD  (Max of 4:3 ratio at the above figures)
    After that it depends how you are recording the chat.
    Quicktime X would do it.
    iChat will do it itself (if the Buddy agrees)
    10:14 PM      Wednesday; February 1, 2012
    Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
      iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Lion 10.7.2)
     G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
     MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
     Mac OS X (10.6.8),
    "Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously

  • Bad performance updating purchase order (ME22N)

    Hello!
    Recently, we face bad performance updating purchase orders using transaction ME22N. The problem occurs since we implemented change documents for a custom table T. T is used to store additional data to purchase order positions using BAdIs ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST and ME_GUI_PO_CUST.
    I've created a change document C_T for T using transaction SCDO. The update module of the change document is triggered in the method POST of BAdI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST.
    Checking transaction SM13, I recognized that the update requests of ME22n have status INIT for several minutes before they are processed. I also tried to exclude the call of the update module for change document C_T (in Method POST) - the performance problem still occurs!
    The problem only occurs with transaction ME22N, thus I assume that the reason is the new change document C_T.
    Thanks for your help!
    Greetings,
    Wolfgang

    I agree with vikram, we don't have enough information, even not a small hint on usage of this field, so which answer do you expect (The quality of an answer depends ...) This analysis must be executed on your system...
    From a technical point of view, the BAPI_PO_CHANGE has EXTENSIONIN table parameter, fill it using structure BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM[X] alreading containing CI_EKPODB (*) and CI_EKPODBX (**)
    Regards,
    Raymond
    (*) I guess you have used this include
    (**) I guess you forgot this one (same field names but data element always BAPIUPDATE)

  • Reporting on master data customer and bad performances : any workaround ?

    Hello,
    I've been asked to investiguate on bad performances encountered when performing reporting
    on the specific master data zcustomer.
    Basically this master data has a quite similar design that 0customer, there are 96000 entries in the master data table.
    A simple query has been developed : the reporting is done on the master data zcustomer and its attributes : no key figure, no calculation, no restriction ...
    Nevertheless, the query can not be executed .. the query runs around 10 minute in rsrt, then the private memory is exhausted and then a short dump is generated.
    I tried to buid a very simple query on 0customer, this time, without the attributes ... and it took more than 30 sec before I get the results.
    I checked the queries statistics :
    3.x Analyzer Server 10 sec
    OLAP: Read Texts : 20 sec
    How is it that it is so long to performthe reporitng on those master data, while in the same time If i try to display the content in SAP by choosing "maintain master data", I have an immediate answer.
    I there any workaround ?
    Any help would be really appreciated.
    thank you.
    Raoul

    Hi.
    How much data have you got in the cube?
    If you make no restrictions, you are asking the system to return data for all 96.000 customers. That is one thing that might take some time.
    Also, using the attributes of this customer object, fx making selection or displaying several of them, means that the system has to run through the 96.000 records in masterdata to know what goes where in the report.
    When you display the masterdata, you are by default displaying just the 250 or so first hits, and you are not joining against any cube or sorting the result set, so that is fast.
    You should make some kind of restriction on other things than zcustomer (time, org.unit, version, etc, to limit the dataset from the cube, but also a restriction on one of the zcustomer attribs, with an index for that maybe, and performance should improve.
    br
    Jacob

  • Bad Performance in a query into table BKPF

    Hi forum i have a really problem in the second query under the table
    BKPF.. some body cans help me, please
    *THIS IS THE QUERY UNDER MSEG
      SELECT tmsegmblnr tmkpfbudat tmsegbelnr tmsegbukrs tmseg~matnr
             tmsegebelp tmsegdmbtr tmsegwaers tmsegwerks tmseg~lgort
             tmsegmenge tmsegkostl
      FROM mseg AS tmseg JOIN mkpf AS tmkpf ON tmsegmblnr = tmkpfmblnr
      INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_docs
      WHERE
        tmseg~bukrs IN se_bukrs AND
        tmkpf~budat IN se_budat AND
        tmseg~mjahr = d_gjahr AND
        ( tmsegbwart IN se_bwart AND tmsegbwart IN (201,261) ).
      IF sy-dbcnt > 0.
    I CREATE AWKEY FOR CONSULTING BKPF
        LOOP AT it_docs.
          CONCATENATE it_docs-mblnr d_gjahr INTO it_docs-d_awkey.
          MODIFY it_docs.
        ENDLOOP.
    THIS IS THE QUERY WITH BAD BAD PERFOMANCE
    I NEED KNOW "BELNR" FOR GO TO THE BSEG TABLE
        SELECT belnr awkey
        FROM bkpf
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_tmp
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_docs
        WHERE
          bukrs = it_docs-bukrs AND
          awkey = it_docs-d_awkey AND
          gjahr = d_gjahr AND
          bstat = space .
    THNKS

    Hi Josue,
    The bad performance is because you're not specifying the primary keys of the table BKPF in your WHERE condition; BKPF usually is a big table.
    What you really need is to create a new index on database for table BKPF via the ABAP Dictionary on fields BUKRS, AWKEY, GJAHR & BSTAT. You'll find the performace of the program will significantly increase after the new index is activated. But I would talk to the Basis first to confirm they have no issues if you create a new index for BKPF on the database system.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers,
    Sougata.

  • Why can't I view video from my SD card on my Mac? It appears on my RFH400 but not the Mac?!

    I recorded four short videos onto an SD card using a Canon HFR400 video camera. When I load the SD card into the computer I’m only able to view one video. The others show no images, only a black screen but each will play for the length of each video. 
    Weird part is that I can play back all four videos in playback mode on the camera. It’s just loading them onto the computer which causes 3 of 4 to go blank. Any idea why it’s not allowing me to view?? 
    I thought it had to do with the format or possibly using a Mac, but it doesn’t make sense that one video can be seen and the others can’t. They were all shot within 15 minutes of each other. May have to try Canon tech support but it doesn’t seem to be a camera issue.

    Hi canondude!
    Thanks for posting.
    Ho are you bringing the video clips over to your computer?  Are you connecting the camera or are you using a card reader?  What program are you using to import the video clips?
    If this is a time sensitive-matter, additional support options are available at Contact Us.
    Did this answer your question? Please click the Accept as Solution button so that others may find the answer as well.

  • Bad performance in web intelligence reports

    Hi,
    We use Business Objects with Web Intelligence documents and Crystal Reports.
    We are supporting bad performance when we use the reports specilly when we need to change the drill options
    Can someone telling me if exists some best practices to improve performance? What features should i look to?
                      Best Regards
                            João Fernandes

    Hi,
    Thank you for your interest. I know that this a issue with many variables because that i need information about anything that could cause bad performance.
    For bad performance i mean the time that we take running and refreshing reports data.
    We have reports with many lines but the performance is bad even when a few users are in the system
                                 Best Regards
                                         João Fernandes

  • Help: Bad performance in marketing documents!

    Hello,
    When creating an AR delivery note which has about 10 lines, we have really noticed that the creation of lines becomes slower and slower. This especially happens when making tab in the system field "Quantity". In fact, before going to the next field quickly, it stays in Quantity field for about 5 seconds!
    The number of formatted searches in AR delivery note is only 5. And only one is automatic. The number of user fields is about 5.
    We have heard about the bad performance when the number of lines increases in the documents when having formatted searches, but it is odd to happen this with about 10 lines in the document.
    We are using PL16 and this issue seems to have been solved already at PL10.
    Could you throw some light on this?
    Thanks in advance,

    It is solved now.
    It had to be with the automatic formated search in 2 head fields.
    If the automatic search is removed, the performance is OK.
    Hope it helps you,

  • Video download from SD card 2 iPad 2 interrupted, file corrupted.  Cannot find file to delete.  Does not appear in Photos, or is not visible using Windows File Manager.  Consumed 2.5G of space!  Can anyone help

    Video download from SD card to iPad 2 interrupted,  corrupted.  Cannot find file to delete.  Does not appear in Photos, or is not visible using Windows File Manager.  Consumed 2.5G of space!  Can anyone help?

    Video download from SD card to iPad 2 interrupted,  corrupted.  Cannot find file to delete.  Does not appear in Photos, or is not visible using Windows File Manager.  Consumed 2.5G of space!  Can anyone help?

Maybe you are looking for