Bad quality of images in preview mode

Hello,
we have the problems after our project migrating from .NET Framework 1 (Visual Studio 2003) to .NET Framework 4.0 (VS 2010 and SAP Crystal Reports).
Report layouts contain Blob fields for images.
The problem is the quality of these images makes worse in comparison with reports generated by old project.
I tried to find the solution but I didn't. We can't use pictures or OLE objects instead of these fields because the list of images is created dynamically. Fields in report have less resolution than original images size, so CR compresses them.
Thanks a lot,
Nadiia

I don't have any other ideas. It may be worth considering creating a phone case here:
http://store.businessobjects.com/store/bobjamer/en_US/pd/productID.98078100?resid=S6I@hgoHAkEAAGsiyVkAAAAR&rests=1282226845369
and get this investigated in more details and perhaps reported for a fix.
- Ludek

Similar Messages

  • No images in preview mode.

    For no apart reason, this one time when I was editing my website for the first time that day, the preview mode no longer shows images, backgrounds or text in the correct don't. This however does all work correctly in design and in browser after exporting. Any ideas as to what's happened and how to fix it?

    Hi
    is it possible to attach few screenshot showing the muse preview, that will help.
    Thanks

  • Bad quality preview in Bridge versus photoshop preview

    Okay here's my problem.  When I view my photos using Bridge CS4 I get a bad quality preview even when preview is set to "Always High Quality" The first photo you will see that there is a greenish yellowish tinge on the side of my daughters cheek.  However, when I open the same image in photoshop that tinge is gone! You can see this in the second image.  Is there a setting that I need to alter here in Bridge? And here's a weird thing....since that file is a raw cr2 file, when I open it up in camera raw, I see the exact same greenish tinge in camera raw as well.  Does anybody know what's going on here?

    Gosh darnit!  It's happening again.  I'm getting that murky yellowy tinge in the shadows again in the preview panel in Bridge AND Photoshop!! I downloaded the CS5 trial and when I was previewing some .CR2 RAW and jpeg files in sRGB color space in Bridge CS5, I see that in the preview box, the image looks awful with that yellowy tinge in the shadows.  I open it up in Photoshop CS5 and zoom way into it, and sure enough, I see that yellowy nightmare.  But when I open it up in picture viewer or in internet explorer, the yellowy tinge is gone.  Man this is frustrating!  I know it can't be a monitor calibration issue cuz if that was the case, the image in picture viewer would indeed, also have the yellowy tinge, correct?  Any ideas?  When the problem mysteriously went away with CS4 when I originally posted this thread several months ago, I thought updating Bridge was the solution.  However, I don't believe that was the real answer.  Anybody got any ideas?  I was curious if it was an "Adobe" issue so I opened up one of the jpeg problem photos in AE CS5 and zoomed in.  Fortunately, the yellowy tinge does NOT show up in the preview panel.  PLEASE HELP!!!
    Dell XPS 430
    Windows 7 64 bit
    Nvidia GT 240
    Dual monitors (Dell 2209WA IPS panels)  

  • Images are not loading - but work in Preview mode

    Hi -
    I was wondering if anyone can help me.  I'm kind of new to Dreamweaver and I can't seem to figure this out on my own. 
    I'm using Dreamweaver 8.  I developed a web page based on a template in which everything works perfectly in "Preview" mode on all browsers.  But when I uploaded the files to my remote hosting, the template based images (found in the "images" folder) are not loading on the page. The images that I added to the template myself, found in the same "images" folder ($200,000 in ..., and picture at bottom) are loading.  So some of the images in the images folder are loading some are not.
    I've checked the Images folder on the remote site, and they all seem to be there.  I've also checked for broken links, and I'm not getting any (I don't know if that would help w/ missing images or not, but I'm trying everything I can think of).  I also checked to see if there is a separate CSS style sheet, and there wasn't one supplied with the template (there is some CSS info in the code on the html page).  The image sizes are all small enough as well.  Can anyone help me with this? 
    You can view one of the pages at: http://www.200kin5months.com/squeeze-video.html
    Thank you in advance to anyone who might be able to help!
    Stacey
    PS - I've attached a screenshot from Dreamweaver Preview to show what it is supposed to look like.

    Your Web server is running on an operating system that is case-sensitive. You appear to have uploaded an Images folder, but not an images folder.
    You do not have a file here:
    images/squeeze-video_425x344_r9_c6.jpg
    But you do have a file here:
    Images/squeeze-video_425x344_r9_c6.jpg
    So you'll need to either change all your image/<whatever> links to point to Images/<whatever>, or upload another folder named images.
    Or, if you want to use a single folder, and if your local file system is not case-sensitive, you might be able to do it in DW's file panel. Here is a method that you might use to have all of them in a folder named images.
    BACK UP YOUR SITE FILES
    Rename Images to Foo (allow DW to update links)
    Rename Foo to images (allow DW to update links)
    Upload the images folder and any/all files that DW changed
    Delete the online Images folder
    HTH
    Mark A. Boyd
    Keep-On-Learnin' :-)

  • Bad quality preview via HDMI

    Hello together!
    After searching for days in the www and on this board I hope somebody here knows a solution for this problem:
    Im looking for a quality solution to preview the program monitor as a full screen picture on my Panasonic HD-Ready TV. I got it running, but there is a really strange quality problem:
    When I just use the TV as a second Windows display and I move the program monitor onto it (no full screen but at 100% display level) the preview looks nice but I can not see the complete picture, because 1280x720 plus the program monitor itself is too big for my screen When I change the display size of the program monitor to something lower than 100% the scaling looks very bad higher than 100% no problem with scaling.
    So this is my problem:
    When I switch it in the playback settings to playback on extern monitor to view it full screen there is a problem. Diagonal lines get a bad looking aliasing. My idea was that CS3 is scaling something (and this does the program not as good as I tried the preview with trailversions of Edius5 or Vegas8c). Just at 100% CS3 preview looks nice (the same when I just watch the program monitor on the Notebook display).
    My Nvidia Card is set to HDMI 720p output. The TV says it is a 720p signal what is coming form my HDMI cable, and last but not least my footage is also filmed in 720p60 (Sony Ex1) and I used the 720p60 EX1 setting in CS3.
    So again, when I just watch these clips for example with the Sony clip browser on my TV (also form this Notebook via the same HDMI output) the diagonal lines start not to flicker and are displayed very sharp. So it cant be the graphic card, the TV or the footage at my knowledge.
    So why does CS3 scale there something in the full screen preview although from input to output everything is in 720p? Furthermore why is the scale in such a bad quality (Edius does this perfect so maybe I have just a wrong setting somewhere in my CS3 settings). Is CS3 not using the graphic card for scaling?
    My system:
    Asus V1S Notebook
    NVidia GeForce 8600M GT 512MB
    Duo T7500
    2GB Ram
    Windows Vista
    Hope somebody here is able to find a solution for this problem, because I dont want to buy an extra video board (like Axio) for it.
    Best wishes,
    Swen

    But often with these cards, you can not work in the CS3 normal nativ settings for Ex1 footage.
    At my knowldge when I would like to open a project which with a Blackmagic Card for example and I like to finish the editing on an other computer without that card you'll have a problem (because BM or other cards allway use their own presett window-right?). So you lose a lot of flexibilty by using a card or a third party codec like this. So it's not so future proof as just to work with the NLE Software itself.
    I see this now with my old Premiere 6.5 Projects. I used a Canopus Raptor RT2 for this with the Canopus codec. That worked very very well, but now I can't use this project anylonger on a new editing CS3 station, because it doens't support these Canopus transitions and codecs. Also the only Windows Notebook based output solution is the MotuV4 box... not a very cost effectiv solution for a preview.
    So again. There must be a sloution to get the problem with the diagonal lines fixed. Why does CS3 scale the preview when 720p footage should be displayed over a 720p output onto a 720p Monitor? No need for scaling? Or am I wrong with this?

  • Bad quality of web images X1 Carbon 2015

    All images (especially the small ones) and icons from internet and some applications have very bad quality as if they had very low resolution. For example, all avatars on Facebook look really bad, I can hardly recognize people. The same holds for all logos and banners with text images. I understand that the images get distorted because of extremely high resolution of the display (2560x1440) - by the way normal text and all Windows images have excellent clarity - however I can hardly beleive that a 2000 EUR machine is not able to provide appropriate image quality even for simle internet surfing! Is that a fact you have to accept when having 2560x1440 or is it somehow possible to get normal image quality? (Otherwise I'll return the laptop).

    Here is a screen shot of how it looks like when you open private modus in IE.
    At the top you see the blue block [InPrivate] in excellent quality and at the bottom you see how the same thing is displayed when it's an image. Actually both should look the same.

  • Pixelated images when in preview mode on iMovie, but when I pause it the images become clear. How do I fix this?

    I just bought the latest version of iMovie and I am on 10.9.4. I transferred my slideshow from the old iMovie to the new one and almost all the pictures become pixelated when in preview mode. Yet when I pause it, the picture becomes clear. What do I do? It's driving me insane!

    After more attemps at cropping Im noticing that the saved version is unzoomed, so if I move the zoom bar just a tad the image becomes instantly sharp. But sadly that doesnt help me because iphoto will only let me save it and post it online as the unsharp pixulated version. Can anyone please help me!

  • When i transfer an photoshop image in Indesign, this one come out in very bad quality and pixelise even once print

    Hello,
    I have an issu, every image i bring or change trough Photoshop CS6 and transfer to Indesign CS6 or Illustrator CS6 comes out in very bad quality and very pixelated whyle printed.
    The original image in photoshop is 29x32 cm with 300 ppp.
    When i transfer in Indesign, i have to reduce the site via the adjustment button and it comes in terrible quality.
    It never happen before, its just recently, and i didn't change my way to save or the properties of my Photoshop, so if someone can help me to resolve this problem, i will be glad.
    Regards,
    Marie

    Before I should save the image as a PSD (without Clipping Mask and dont flatten the image). the print would come out different colours...not the same.
    Are you saying the printer can't get a .PSD to output, or a PSD's color is unpredictable? Sounds like your printer can print .PSDs, but you  have a color management problem. By different colors do you mean that the printed CMYK color values are different than what was in the placed PSD? If that's the case it may be that the PSD had a profile that conflicted with the InDesign document profile and you are getting unexpected color conversions somewhere in the workflow.

  • My firefox is loading Bad quality images, but actully the images are perfectly alright

    My firefox is loading Bad quality images, but actully the images are perfectly alright

    In my experience, print quality settings such as dpi/ppi are hidden in your printer driver settings and not directly available through Firefox's UI. In the print dialog, if you click the Properties button, you hopefully will gain access to this setting. Obviously native web resolution (96ppi) can give disappointing results, so hopefully you can find a place to increase it.

  • Different font quality in preview mode

    Hello,
    is it normal that fonts become so bulky in preview mode?
    I´m using a Webfont in this case (PT Sans Narrow Bold)
    Especially the button text.

    Hi,
    Please refer to the following threads for more information,
    Web Fonts (Not Working) - http://forums.adobe.com/message/4435315
    Safari, IE, and Firefox display website type differently - http://forums.adobe.com/message/4584137#4584137
    Regards,
    Abhishek Maurya

  • When publishing characters get bad quality

    Hi!
    I'm trying to use Captivate 6 characters, but, when I watch the slides in the editing version, it's OK, when I try to preview or publish them, they get a very bad quality.
    Can you help me, please
    Thanks, Mariana

    Those characters are high quality images, with transparency. I suppose you are still on 6.0.1 and didn't change the default slide quality, which is set to low. That is the reason, finally the team listened to my begging and in 6.1. the default quality is set to Optimized. Try to change that quality, and if that doesn't solve the issue, uncheck all compression settings when publishing as well.
    Lilybiri

  • Bad quality colorbust

    I have a IMAQ 1408 and a NTSC camera (alm-2451g wireless microcamera,
    like this: http://www.prymesecurity.com/2451g.htm ) and i can't snap
    Still-color images because i get this acquisition error message:
    bad quality colorbust.
    I know that colorbust is color synchronization signal: someone can
    tell me why IMAQ 1408 can't find it?
    With other acquisition cards i can capture color videos and images
    easy, but with IMAQ 1408 i can just snap and grab in monochromatic
    mode (selecting disabled in "still color" combo).

    Hello.
    With other acquisition cards i can capture color videos and images
    easy, but with IMAQ 1408 i can just snap and grab in monochromatic
    mode (selecting disabled in "still color" combo)
    This is a little surprising, as the error message that you get is almost always related to a non-color camera being connected to a PCI-1408 (or 1409) in still-color mode. This error comes when the signal is not as expected. Based on what you have mentioned, I am guessing this is a composite color camera. There are only a few remaining things to check/change:
    1. Be sure composite is selected in the still-color mode.
    2. Be sure that NTSC is selected as the camera (right-click on channel and select Camera_NTSC).
    3. Go to the property page for the channel and ve
    rify that the reference voltages and other settings are according to the specs of the camera.
    I hope this helps lead to the answer!
    Regards,
    Colin C.
    Applications Engineering
    Colin Christofferson
    Community Web Marketing
    Blog

  • SWF Movie Won't Load in Preview Mode?

    Hey, I'm new to all of this, but when I put my .SWF movie into my website as an advertisment banner, but when I open it in preview mode, it just doesn't load. Why is this?
    Here is the code for it (I think):
      <tr>
        <td height="404" colspan="2"><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="550" height="400" align="middle" id="FlashID">
          <param name="movie" value="../Ad Banner.swf" />
          <param name="quality" value="high" />
          <param name="wmode" value="opaque" />
          <param name="swfversion" value="6.0.65.0" />
          <!-- This param tag prompts users with Flash Player 6.0 r65 and higher to download the latest version of Flash Player. Delete it if you don’t want users to see the prompt. -->
          <param name="expressinstall" value="../Scripts/expressInstall.swf" />
          <!-- Next object tag is for non-IE browsers. So hide it from IE using IECC. -->
          <!--[if !IE]>-->
          <object data="../Ad Banner.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="550" height="400" align="middle">
            <!--<![endif]-->
            <param name="quality" value="high" />
            <param name="wmode" value="opaque" />
            <param name="swfversion" value="6.0.65.0" />
            <param name="expressinstall" value="../Scripts/expressInstall.swf" />
            <!-- The browser displays the following alternative content for users with Flash Player 6.0 and older. -->
            <div>
              <h4>Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.</h4>
              <p><a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer"><img src="http://www.adobe.com/images/shared/download_buttons/get_flash_player.gif" alt="Get Adobe Flash player" width="112" height="33" /></a></p>
            </div>
            <!--[if !IE]>-->
          </object>
          <!--<![endif]-->
        </object></td>
      </tr>
    Any help or suggestions would be useful, as this is for my school coursework. Thanks in advance!

    It would be best to post a link to a live test page online.
    If you mean while being previewed in a browser, which one(s) are having the problem with?

  • Premiere Pro CS6 - Video Output (GPU) bad quality...

    Hi,
    I have a question about Adobe Premiere Pro CS6...
    I have installed the Trial-Version and use a BM Intensity Pro to output Full-HD 1080i (50, Interlace) trough HDMI Video-Output...
    The Video-Output works correctly, but if I enable the "GPU"-Acceleration (CUDA), and scale or transform a Video (for example a 3D-Transformation) the Quality of the transforming is very bad! (jerky, not "smooth", Interlace-Lines etc...)
    If I deactivate the GPU-Acceleration (Software only Mode), everything is smooth and looks good!
    Also if I render the Timeline, all tranformations are also smooth, only the Realtime GPU Rendering looks very bad....
    What can I do?

    Hi :-)
    I have tested it now with another Grafikcard!
    And it is exactly the same problem
    I have found out, that the GPU makes a delay, after a few seconds the Transformation looks smooth/bicubic!
    But on relatime-Playback its bad...
    My English isnt very good, so I have some problems to describe what I mean...
    If you stop the playback, it takes 2 Sekonds and then the image looks good!
    But dureing the playback its very bad quality, false Interlace-Lines etc...
    here are two screenshots:

  • Gif file won't animate in Muse's preview mode or in Muse's view in browser mode

    Created a gif file with Photoshop that's 7.5MB in size.  Placed the gif  file on a Muse page.  But, the gif won't animate in Muse's preview mode or when Muse sends the page to be viewed in browser mode.  I'm using a Mac running OS X 10.9.2 and I'm a creative cloud member using Muse.  Any solutions?

    Step one to enable the community to help debug what you're encountering would be to provide the URL for the page where the GIF is being used. My first guess would be there are effects applied to the image (i.e. inner glow, bevel, etc.) that require Muse to re-encode the image and Muse does not support encoding animated .gif. It only supports passing animated .gif files through unchanged. (And to get an image to pass through unchanged it needs to have no effects that require rasterization applied in Muse.)
    Given you've stated the GIF file is 7.5Mb I have to question your choice of .gif. At 7.5Mb this single file will take ~8 seconds to download on the average US broadband connection and will be much slower for many broadband users and most cellular users. GIF is a reasonable choice for very small short animations used sparingly, but is seldom (if ever) a good choice for larger or longer animations. Better choices for those are to use a video or a tool like Edge Animate to create a HTML5/CSS3 animation. The end result will be vastly more user friendly in terms of page load performance.
    A huge percentage of first time visitors to a webpage will cancel the page load rather than waiting 8+ seconds for the page load to complete.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Help needed in Radio buttons (ABAP web dynpro)

    Hi all, I need to implement 2 stand alone Radio buttons (not groupbykey or groupbyindex). I could add the same in my view layout, but I am not sure how to use the KeyToSelect and SelectedKey options. How do I control when the button is selected/desel

  • Support IP Phone 7912 on CUCM 8.6?

    pleasse can anybody tell me if 7912 is supported in CUMC 8.6,  in the release notes it´s not mentioned

  • RAM upgrade from 1gig to 2gig for 1.83 Mac Mini Core 2 duo

    I have the new 1.83 gig mac mini and attempting to upgrade ram. Once opened, the ram slots are not easily available, unlike the older versions where you just snap it when the cover is removed. Is there any video instructions out there? The one I foun

  • How do I unblock my iPhone 4a network

    I Bought an iPhone 4S off eBay but I can't get any reception or signal on my network, I contacted O2 with my issues and they told me its because network is blocked, any ideas how I can resolve my problem as phones telling me restricted access to nerw

  • Create PDF without image compression?

    How do i create a pdf from multiple images without any compression? Seems like even if i do optimize pdf and select png(edit the settings to do max res and no downscaling), when it saves the pdf, at 100% zoom, it's obviously bigger than my original p