BADI implementation in SRM

HI,
I have implemented the BADI ZBBP_CREATE_BE_RQ_NEW, and wondering what code I need to put in method FILL_RQ_INTERFACE so that shopping cart number can be transferred to the back-end PR tracking number field ??,
I know that BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE is called in the back-end ??,
I am not an ABAPer, so any code would be of great help!!

I guess you will have to implement BBP_SC_TRANSFER_BE, method GET_NUMBER_OR_RANGE. I did this for my requirement.
Code below replaces the requisition number with SC number if number range is RQ and doc type is ISRM
Data Declaration
CONSTANTS: c_doctype(4)    TYPE c VALUE 'ISRM'.
Replace the requisition number with shopping cart number
IF cv_number_range EQ 'RQ' and is_item-be_doc_type NE c_doctype.
    SELECT SINGLE object_id FROM crmd_orderadm_h INTO cv_number WHERE
     guid = is_item-header.
     IF sy-subrc NE 0.
     ENDIF.
ENDIF.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
SKJ

Similar Messages

Implementation of BADI BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI in SRM. and BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI

Hi All,
Facing a problem in BADI can u please help me out...
I am implementing sourcing dashboard.
I am facing problem while implementing the badi BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI in SRM. and BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI in R3.
i have written following code in BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI in SRM
method IF_EX_BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI~BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND.
data : ls_item type BBP_PDS_PO_ITEM_D.
data : w_customer_fields type BBPS_IF_CUSTOMER_FIELDS_PI.
move 'POITEM' to w_customer_fields-refobject.
move 'CATALOGID' to w_customer_fields-fieldname.
move ls_item-catalogid to w_customer_fields-container.
append w_customer_fields to ct_bapi_customer_fields.
endmethod.
i have created field zsrmcatalogid field in R3 in EKPO table.and i am now implementing the Badi in R3 for BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI .....in extended classic scenario.
i have written following code in R3 BADI
method IF_EX_BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI~BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI.
data : wa_customer_fields type bbps_if_customer_fields,
wa_bapi_te_mepoitem type bapi_te_mepoitem,
wa_bapi_te_mepoitemx type bapi_te_mepoitemx,
wa_extensionin type bapiparex.
data : txt_960(960) type c.
read table bbp_customer_fields into wa_customer_fields with key
refobject = 'POITEM' fieldname = 'CATALOGID'.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
move wa_customer_fields-container TO
wa_bapi_te_mepoitem-zsrmcatalogid.
wa_bapi_te_mepoitemx-zsrmcatalogid = 'X'.
endif.
clear txt_960.
clear wa_extensionin.
write wa_bapi_te_mepoitem to txt_960 left-justified.
wa_extensionin-structure = 'BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM'.
wa_extensionin-valuepart1 = txt_960(240).
wa_extensionin-valuepart2 = txt_960+240(240).
wa_extensionin-valuepart3 = txt_960+480(240).
wa_extensionin-valuepart4 = txt_960+720(240).
append wa_extensionin to bapi_extensionin.
clear txt_960.
clear wa_extensionin.
write wa_bapi_te_mepoitemx to txt_960 left-justified.
wa_extensionin-structure = 'BAPI_TE_MEPOITEMX'.
wa_extensionin-valuepart1 = txt_960(240).
wa_extensionin-valuepart2 = txt_960+240(240).
wa_extensionin-valuepart3 = txt_960+480(240).
wa_extensionin-valuepart4 = txt_960+720(240).
append wa_extensionin to bapi_extensionin.
endmethod.
But its not working...
The PO details are not passed from SRM to R3.......
Can anybody help me regarding how to debug the BADI in R3.
Thanks in Advance...

Hi Ravi,
I never tried those BADIs to pass CUF fields.
But here an attempt to understand it.
First, have you maintained the mandatory R/3 CUF mapping table BBP_CUFMAP ?
Your SRM BADI is not correct, because you don't populate enough data.
There is a particular logic for ct_bapi_customer_fields (look at R/3 mapping in LBBP_BAPI_POF04, called before the R/3 BADI).
Following fields must be populated:
- REFOBJECT: ok with POITEM
- FIELDNAME: dummy name (CATALOGID) or real R/3 field (zsrmcatalogid)? --> used in mapping table BBP_CUFMAP to get the R/3 field
- REFFIELD1: missing: put PO_ITEM ?
- REFVAL1 : missing: put the PO item number (numc 5)
- CONTAINER: ok with final value we want to pass
I think that if SRM BADI and the R/3 mapping table are populated correctly, the fields are transfered to R/3 PO item without additionnal coding on R/3 BADI side.
The R/3 BADI goal is not to create BAPI_EXTENSIONIN. This is done by the Form MAPPING_CUSTOMER_FIELDS of include LBBP_BAPI_POF04.
Later on, the custom fields of BAPI_EXTENSIONIN are transfered automatically to EKPO fields via a move-corresponding.
In the way you coded R/3 BADI, you by-pass the Form MAPPING_CUSTOMER_FIELDS, to populate the BAPI_EXTENSIONIN by yourself.
This could work like this, but you missed one info: the PO item number (missing in SRM BADI) !!!
For debugging, what additional details do yo need ?
Rgds
Christophe

BADI Implementaion in SRM

Hi Experts,
I am new to SRM, I have to implement BBP_CUF_BADI for adding custom fields in the Contract and Purchase order.
Could you please tell me the tcode to see the Contract/Purchase order screen where I have to add Custome fields??
this badi is going to implement in SRM only, am I right ?
any body can tell me how to start the things and see the effect of the implementation of BADI in my case???
looking forward for your response..
Reg,
Rajesh

Hi Rajesh,
Go to transaction SICF.
Enter the value for Service Name:
BBP_CTR_MAIN for Contracts.
Press F8.
Drill down to see the service bbp_ctr_main and then right click on it and choose test service. A web page will open where the contract screen will appear. Here you can check the custom fields that you added.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Pradeep

Sending Email using cl_bcs from a badi implementation

Hi,
I have written my code to send Email, inside AFTER_SAVE method of BADI Implementation of DOCUMENT_MAIN01.
Now this method of cl_bcs requires COMMIT WORK for the mail to be sent. And inside BADI implementation, we cannot write a COMMIT statement.
What is a workaround for this? While going through few other posts, I came across remote enabled FMs.
Is that the only way? Can I use some additions like STARTING NEW TASK etc. Following is the call used in case of cl_bcs:
   CALL METHOD G_REF_SEND_REQUEST->SEND(
          EXPORTING
            I_WITH_ERROR_SCREEN = 'X'
         RECEIVING
            RESULT              = G_SENT_TO_ALL ).
I also tried using SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1 STARTING NEW TASK and it works fine. But the subject length is a constraint their.
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.

Hi friend.
*& Report ZTEST_273068_EMAIL_CL_BCS
REPORT ZTEST_273068_EMAIL_CL_BCS.
CONSTANTS:
    gc_subject TYPE so_obj_des VALUE 'ABAP Email with CL_BCS',
    gc_raw     TYPE char03 VALUE 'RAW'.
DATA:
    gv_mlrec         TYPE so_obj_nam,
    gv_sent_to_all   TYPE os_boolean,
    gv_email         TYPE adr6-smtp_addr,
    gv_subject       TYPE so_obj_des,
    gv_text          TYPE bcsy_text,
    gr_send_request TYPE REF TO cl_bcs,
    gr_bcs_exception TYPE REF TO cx_bcs,
    gr_recipient     TYPE REF TO if_recipient_bcs,
    gr_sender        TYPE REF TO cl_sapuser_bcs,
    gr_document      TYPE REF TO cl_document_bcs.
TRY.
      "Create send request
      gr_send_request = cl_bcs=>create_persistent( ).
      "Email FROM...
      gr_sender = cl_sapuser_bcs=>create( sy-uname ).
      "Add sender to send request
      CALL METHOD gr_send_request->set_sender
        EXPORTING
          i_sender = gr_sender.
      "Email TO...
      gv_email = '[email protected]'.
      gr_recipient = cl_cam_address_bcs=>create_internet_address( gv_email ).
      "Add recipient to send request
      CALL METHOD gr_send_request->add_recipient
        EXPORTING
          i_recipient = gr_recipient
          i_express   = 'X'.
      "Email BODY
      APPEND 'Hello world! My first ABAP email!' TO gv_text.
      gr_document = cl_document_bcs=>create_document(
                      i_type    = gc_raw
                      i_text    = gv_text
                      i_length = '12'
                      i_subject = gc_subject ).
      "Add document to send request
      CALL METHOD gr_send_request->set_document( gr_document ).
      "Send email
      CALL METHOD gr_send_request->send(
        EXPORTING
          i_with_error_screen = 'X'
        RECEIVING
          result              = gv_sent_to_all ).
      IF gv_sent_to_all = 'X'.
        WRITE 'Email sent!'.
      ENDIF.
      "Commit to send email
      COMMIT WORK.
      "Exception handling
    CATCH cx_bcs INTO gr_bcs_exception.
      WRITE:
        'Error!',
        'Error type:',
        gr_bcs_exception->error_type.
ENDTRY.
Just Execute it.
Regards,
Thrimu

BADI implementation is not working in background for MRRL

Hai frnds,
BADI: MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE is used for deducting withholding tax in MRRL(Invoice verification). This BADI was implemented and working fine in foreground, but not working in background.
After implementing the BADI, the standard method of calculating TDS(from vendor master) is over written by BADI implementation.Now standard deduction is also not workijng in background.Plz help me to solve it.
Bala.V

HI,
COR6N is the Enjoy Transaction and sap does not suggest to write the BDC on these transaction as most of these transaction uses the GUI elements foe better display and which cannot be recorded while processing the BDC in back ground.
Check for the Normal transaction and write the BDC for it.
Or
Pass X to Rcommit flag in the CTU_PARAMS option and check.

How to change the name of a BADI Implementation?

Hello experts,
Does anyone knows how to change the name of the BADI Implementation? I just create a new Implementation but we need to rename it.
Thanks in advance,
AK

Hi,
Please go to transaction SE19, enter your implementation name.
Then go to menu: Implementation -> Rename -> ...
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

BADI implementation for NOTIF_EVENT_POST not getting triggered

Hi All,
We have created an implementaion for the NOTIF_EVENT_POST. And it was working fine previously. Now it is not working for some reason. In fact issue is that the implemetation is not getting triggerd at all. I have put a BREAK-POINT statement in the code, but does not even goes into the code.
I have checked all the properties. It is active. The table V_EXT_IMP has a entry corresponding to the BADI definition and implementation.
I tried to debug the standard transaction IW52 (which uses this). The program runs till the FM call for CL_EXITHANDLER=>GET_INSTANCE. It created a instance also. But it does not get inside the call for the method of the BADI LR_BADI_INST->CHECK_DATA_AT_POST.
I am at a fix now. Can somebody answer this issue? It would be very helpful.
Regards
Barada.
Edited by: Baradakanta Swain on Aug 5, 2008 4:06 PM

I did not get the issue with the BADI implementation. But as our time line was very tight, we moved the code to BTE event for Updating Notifications.
This required a little tweaking of the code and now it is working.
I am marking it ANSWERED so as to remove it from the list of unanswered questions.
Regards
Barada

BAPI Check in BADI Implementation

Dear All,
We have made an enhancement through BADI in ME21N / ME22N transaction like validating certain entries, in that I am checking the t-codes ME21, ME21N, ME22 and ME22N. If it fails then PO wonu2019t create and populate some messages.
Now there is one custom program which creating POu2019s through calling BAPI in the program and itu2019s not validating the above as its calling through custom program.
(i.e SY-TCODE eq SE38)
Now how I should put a condition on BAPI in my BADI implementation?? If it is normal user exit, we can use runtime structure T158 and check the TCODE in that. But as I am using the BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST with the method CHECK doesnu2019t have any transaction code info.
And currently I have an idea of using the GET / SET Parameters and need to set in the custom program and get that info in BADI? But I donu2019t know whether this idea good or not?? If anyone has any idea please let me know?
Thanks,
Raghu.

Hi Raghu,
If sy-tcode ne 'ME21'
and sy-tcode ne 'ME21N'...
IMPORT lv_data ....
do processing...
endif.
Best regards,
Prashant

Accessing internal table declared outside of BAdI implementation

I am working on a BAdI implementation and within the BAdI, I need to manipulate the data of an internal table that is declared in the calling routine. This internal table is not a parameter to the BAdI call. I am wondering is there a way to access the internal table that is not recognized by the BAdI implementation? If so, what's the syntax to do this?
I know in debug mode, I am able to access the content of the internal table by using (Program)Itab. But I get a syntax error when accessing the internal table using (Program)Itab syntax.
Any help is appreciated!

Thanks, Max.
I tried your method, but I am getting a short dump due to type conflict. I think it's because the internal table I'd like to access is declared using the following syntax:
data: begin of itab occurs 0,
end of itab.
Therefore, when processing the assign statement, the field-symbol is being treated as a structure...
I tried to change the field-symbol type to any, but after that, I can't modify the table content using loop at type of syntax..
Do you have any other suggestions?
Thanks very much!

More than one filter in a BAdi implementation

Hi Experts,
   Is it possible to have more than one filter value for one BAdi implementation?
   Or should I create separate implementation for every filter value?
   I tried creating second filter in an existing BAdi implementation and it is not allowing.
Thanks and regards,
Venkat.

Hi,
I agree with Sandeep.
You can create n number of filter values according to the bussiness need.
Thanks
Arbind

Migrated BADI Implementation not triggering in ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
Need your urgent assistance how to deal with migrated BADI implementation which is not triggering in ECC 6.0. This is for PO (ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST). In the original version (4.6) it was working fine. But when this is migrated to ECC 6.0, it's not firing. Please help to trigger this one in ECC 6.0.
Points will be awarded and thanks in advance,
LM

Hi LM,
Can you just paste the code in the BADI.(The method in which code is there)
Is this BADI implemented and in the Active status.
Check in SE19 if the implementation exist or not?
There may be chances that some condition is not met which can trigger this BADI. Have you read the documentation of the BADI?
Regards,
Atish

BADI implementation in ECC 6.0

I want to put a validation when changing business partner details using tcode BP but it seems there no user exists but BADIs but the BADIs that i am getting i think can only be used after the update has taken place. i have BADI ADDRESS_UPDATE and i need to know ho i can implement it in ECC 6.0. I tried SE18 but its saying "Create" operation is possible only for enhancement spots. how best can implement it

Hi Willard,
Identify ur enhancement spot. Go to SE18, give the enhancement spot name and display.
You can see your BADI in that spot. Click on the button 'Implement Enhancement Spot (F6)'.
Give a name for your enhancement implementation, select ur badi to be implemented in that spot. Give proper name to ur badi implementation.You can now put ur code in that implementation.
Check this blog of Thomas Weiss.
/people/thomas.weiss/blog/2006/04/18/how-to-implement-a-badi-and-how-to-use-a-filter--part-4-of-the-series-on-the-new-enhancement-framework
It clearly explains how you can implement BADI of an enhancement spot in ECC 6.0
Regards,
Soumya.
Edited by: Soumya Jose on Feb 5, 2009 2:14 PM

Calling Search Help in BAdI implementation.

Hi All,
I have created my search help with search help exit function. Now I need to call this Search Help in my BAdI Implementation ( Method of BAdI) . Please suggest me which function I should use to call my search help.

Hi,
Please use the following FM. It might be helpful.
F4IF_SELECT_VALUES
Regards
Bhupal Reddy

BAdI implementation FIAA_BW_DELTA_UPDATE inactive in source system DEV

Hi all.
I'm trying to execute an infopackage to get 0ASSET (texts delta initialization). But it shows me the next error message: "BAdI implementation FIAA_BW_DELTA_UPDATE inactive in source system DEV".
But when I look at this BADI implementation in the source system (Transaction code se19) there are no errors on it.
"BAdI implementation FIAA_BW_DELTA_UPDATE does not contain any errors".
Do somebody knows what's happenning?

Hi,
If you are in version 3.1, then this BADI has an issue.
Kindly refer to the following note:
[SAP Note 590034 Deactivating implementation FIAA_BW_DELTA_UPDATE|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes/sdn_oss_bw_bct/~form/handler%7b5f4150503d3030323030363832353030303030303031393732265f4556454e543d444953504c4159265f4e4e554d3d353930303334%7d]
Cheers...

Regarding BADI implementation in Debugging

Hi,
i have a doubt regarding BADI.There are multiple badi implementations for VA02 transaction. now i am processing the VA02 transaction. Can i know which implementation is processing for the transaction.

Hi Praveen,
Use this code to find out the BADI of a Transaction code:
*& Report ZGET_BADI
REPORT ZGET_BADI.
TABLES : TSTC,
TADIR,
MODSAPT,
MODACT,
TRDIR,
TFDIR,
ENLFDIR,
SXS_ATTRT ,
TSTCT.
DATA : JTAB LIKE TADIR OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : FIELD1(30).
DATA : V_DEVCLASS LIKE TADIR-DEVCLASS.
PARAMETERS : P_TCODE LIKE TSTC-TCODE,
P_PGMNA LIKE TSTC-PGMNA .
DATA wa_tadir type tadir.
START-OF-SELECTION.
IF NOT P_TCODE IS INITIAL.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM TSTC WHERE TCODE EQ P_TCODE.
ELSEIF NOT P_PGMNA IS INITIAL.
TSTC-PGMNA = P_PGMNA.
ENDIF.
IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM TADIR
WHERE PGMID = 'R3TR'
AND OBJECT = 'PROG'
AND OBJ_NAME = TSTC-PGMNA.
MOVE : TADIR-DEVCLASS TO V_DEVCLASS.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM TRDIR
WHERE NAME = TSTC-PGMNA.
IF TRDIR-SUBC EQ 'F'.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM TFDIR
WHERE PNAME = TSTC-PGMNA.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM ENLFDIR
WHERE FUNCNAME = TFDIR-FUNCNAME.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM TADIR
WHERE PGMID = 'R3TR'
AND OBJECT = 'FUGR'
AND OBJ_NAME EQ ENLFDIR-AREA.
MOVE : TADIR-DEVCLASS TO V_DEVCLASS.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
SELECT * FROM TADIR INTO TABLE JTAB
WHERE PGMID = 'R3TR'
AND OBJECT in ('SMOD', 'SXSD')
AND DEVCLASS = V_DEVCLASS.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM TSTCT
WHERE SPRSL EQ SY-LANGU
AND TCODE EQ P_TCODE.
FORMAT COLOR COL_POSITIVE INTENSIFIED OFF.
WRITE:/(19) 'Transaction Code - ',
20(20) P_TCODE,
45(50) TSTCT-TTEXT.
SKIP.
IF NOT JTAB[] IS INITIAL.
WRITE:/(105) SY-ULINE.
FORMAT COLOR COL_HEADING INTENSIFIED ON.
*Sorting the internal Table
sort jtab by OBJECT.
data : wf_txt(60) type c,
wf_smod type i ,
wf_badi type i ,
wf_object2(30) type C.
clear : wf_smod, wf_badi , wf_object2.
*Get the total SMOD.
LOOP AT JTAB into wa_tadir.
at first.
FORMAT COLOR COL_HEADING INTENSIFIED ON.
WRITE:/1 SY-VLINE,
2 'Enhancement/ Business Add-in',
41 SY-VLINE ,
42 'Description',
105 SY-VLINE.
WRITE:/(105) SY-ULINE.
endat.
clear wf_txt.
at new object.
if wa_tadir-object = 'SMOD'.
wf_object2 = 'Enhancement' .
elseif wa_tadir-object = 'SXSD'.
wf_object2 = ' Business Add-in'.
endif.
FORMAT COLOR COL_GROUP INTENSIFIED ON.
WRITE:/1 SY-VLINE,
2 wf_object2,
105 SY-VLINE.
endat.
case wa_tadir-object.
when 'SMOD'.
wf_smod = wf_smod + 1.
SELECT SINGLE MODTEXT into wf_txt
FROM MODSAPT
WHERE SPRSL = SY-LANGU
AND NAME = wa_tadir-OBJ_NAME.
FORMAT COLOR COL_NORMAL INTENSIFIED OFF.
when 'SXSD'.
*For BADis
wf_badi = wf_badi + 1 .
select single TEXT into wf_txt
from SXS_ATTRT
where sprsl = sy-langu
and EXIT_NAME = wa_tadir-OBJ_NAME.
FORMAT COLOR COL_NORMAL INTENSIFIED ON.
endcase.
WRITE:/1 SY-VLINE,
2 wa_tadir-OBJ_NAME hotspot on,
41 SY-VLINE ,
42 wf_txt,
105 SY-VLINE.
AT END OF object.
write : /(105) sy-ULINE.
ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
WRITE:/(105) SY-ULINE.
SKIP.
FORMAT COLOR COL_TOTAL INTENSIFIED ON.
WRITE:/ 'No.of Exits:' , wf_smod.
WRITE:/ 'No.of BADis:' , wf_badi.
ELSE.
FORMAT COLOR COL_NEGATIVE INTENSIFIED ON.
WRITE:/(105) 'No userexits or BADis exist'.
ENDIF.
ELSE.
FORMAT COLOR COL_NEGATIVE INTENSIFIED ON.
WRITE:/(105) 'Transaction does not exist'.
ENDIF.
AT LINE-SELECTION.
data : wf_object type tadir-object.
clear wf_object.
GET CURSOR FIELD FIELD1.
CHECK FIELD1(8) EQ 'WA_TADIR'.
read table jtab with key obj_name = sy-lisel+1(20).
move jtab-object to wf_object.
case wf_object.
when 'SMOD'.
SET PARAMETER ID 'MON' FIELD SY-LISEL+1(10).
CALL TRANSACTION 'SMOD' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
when 'SXSD'.
SET PARAMETER ID 'EXN' FIELD SY-LISEL+1(20).
CALL TRANSACTION 'SE18' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
endcase.
Reward if useful
Regards
Ravi

BADI implementation in SRM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for