Balance Qty for inbound

Hi All,
Can we find the inbound qty balance pending for migo in sap.Is there any table which will store the balance qty of inbound.
Thanks in advance
Basu

Hi experts,
Please help.

Similar Messages

J2I6 - Balance Qty in Stock

Dear Sir`s,
Will anybody tell me how the Balance Qty in Stock ( 14 th no Column ) in the J2I6 Report (T-Code ) coming ?
From where system pick the value ?
I tried to see in MMBE but it is not matching .
Thanks & Regards ,
Ganesh

Hi,
1. "Manage Item Cost per Warehouse" is not checked?
2. Moving Average is the valuation method?
3. You ran the report for especifically warehouse?
1. no, is checked
2. no, FIFO
3. yes, for one warehouse (every item is only in one warehouse anyway)
I filed it with SAP but unfortunately they did not respond yet. Guess we just have to live with it.

Balance qty report

Hi gurus,
Is there any report for open sales orders balance qty..
Regards,
VSN

Hello VSN
you could use report VA05 , to get a list of open sales order. you can get varety of information regarding the open quantity
you get the order qnt, delivered qnt , status -delivered , partially delivered
you can check the status from the report and get a overview analysis
Hope this helps
Thanks
akasha

Post Goods Receipt for Inbound Delivery using WHSCON IDoc

Dear All
Currently I am working on a big project dealing with EDI connections to our logistics partner for the Export business. The entire message flow between Lindt and our partner should be via EDI. Our SAP release is (still) 4.6c.
We will create two kinds of despatch advice messages, one for inbound deliveries and one for outbound deliveries for customers.
I would appreciate your support in the following problem that I am facing with the inbound delivery scenario:
We create stock transport orders (purchase orders, POs) for the goods intended to be delivered into the plant at our partner
We create a delivery (type NL = replenishment delivery) for this POs
As soon as we post the goods issue we send the despatch advice (as EANCOM D96A DESADV message) to our partner.
At this point the delivery is basically completed, i.e. packing status (PS) and goods movement status (GM / GS) are equal to 'C' (= completed).
Our logistics partner uses the same EDI message to send us the goods receipts data, e.g.:
We dispatched 50 units of a product => QTY:50:12
The partner received indeed 50 units => QVR:50:66
Please note that we do not use the QVR segment for the quantity difference (between despatched and received quantity) but it contains the received units. This way we avoid negative values in the QVR segment.
When the logistics partner sends back the DESADV message containing the received quantities (QVR segment) we want to make
the goods receipts for the products in the original stock transport order and
upate the message flow in the delivery
My idea was to transform the incoming DESADV message into a WHSCON.DELVRY03 IDoc based on the documentation in: [Delivery Interface|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/e2/654b15a9f411d184ec0000e81ddea0/content.htm]
In the delivery header control E1EDL18 I used QUALF = 'PGI' (Post goods issue).
I prepared an inbound WHSCON IDoc according to the documentation mentioned below. I managed to get some feedback from the Idoc processing implying that the system tried to do the goods receipt in the PO but failed.
To make a long story short here are my questions:
Can an inbound WHSCON IDoc used for doing both the goods receipt in the PO and the update of the message flow in the delivery?
Does anybody have an example on how to fill the WHSCON IDoc?
Or is my approach a cul-de-sac ?
Kind Regards
Uwe
PS: A related question can be found here: Goods Receipt in PO AND Message Flow Update in Inb. Delivery using WMMBXY

Hi Uwe,
Can an inbound WHSCON IDoc used for doing both the goods receipt in the PO and the update of the message flow in the delivery?
The binary answer would be no. You should use WMMBXY or MBGMCR instead.
But if we are doing goods receipt against Inbound delivery then answer is YES with additionally E1EDL18-QUALF = 'PIC' populated. But please remember no partial receipt is possible against Inbound Delivery.
We should populate E1EDL20-VBELN with our Inbound delivery number and line item info should go to E1EDL24.
I have done a similar interface recently where we are doing receipt against Inbound delivery. But our case was a bit complex because we had to support against Inbound delivery. So we had to go for a custom solution on top of IDOC_INPUT_DELVRY.
Hope this helps. Let me know if you have more questions.
Regards,
Rudra

I want to allocate balance qty in sql.....

Please help me…
I want to allocate balance qty in sql.....
I have data like below table and expected answer in column EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS.
I want to edit data with validation of next process executed qty.
for example in row 3rd and 4th PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY is ORDER_VRNO wise is 100 i.e.
100+0=100 and i want to allocated this qty in 1st and 2nd row i.e. 75,25 i.e. 75+25=100
because first process CUTTING of jobcard_no J113Y-1004 is 75 and next process done is 100 order_vrno wise
so i want to allocated 100 in 75,100 i.e. 75,25 total should be next process execute qty i.e. 100
SLNO
JOBCARD_NO
ORDER_VRNO
PROCESS_CODE
PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY
EDIT_UP_TO_EXPECTED_ANS
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
CUTTING
75
75
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
CUTTING
100
25
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
DRILLING
100
85
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
DRILLING
0
0
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
PUNCHING
15
15
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
PUNCHING
0
0
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
FORMING
0
0
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
FORMING
0
0
Table script ....
with t as
(select 1 SLNO,'J113Y-1004' jobcard_no,'P113Y-56' ORDER_VRNO,'CUTTING' PROCESS_CODE,75 PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY, 75 EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
select 2 SLNO,'J113Y-1005' jobcard_no,'P113Y-56' ORDER_VRNO,'CUTTING' PROCESS_CODE,100 PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY, 25 EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
select 1 SLNO,'J113Y-1004' jobcard_no,'P113Y-56' ORDER_VRNO,'DRILLING' PROCESS_CODE,100 PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY,85 EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
select 2 SLNO,'J113Y-1005' jobcard_no,'P113Y-56' ORDER_VRNO,'DRILLING' PROCESS_CODE,0 PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY,0 EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
select 1 SLNO,'J113Y-1004' jobcard_no,'P113Y-56' ORDER_VRNO,'PUNCHING' PROCESS_CODE,15 PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY, 15 EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
select 2 SLNO,'J113Y-1005' jobcard_no,'P113Y-56' ORDER_VRNO,'PUNCHING' PROCESS_CODE,0 PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY, 0 EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS FROM DUAL
    UNION ALL
select 1 SLNO,'J113Y-1004' jobcard_no,'P113Y-56' ORDER_VRNO,'FORMING' PROCESS_CODE,0 PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY, 0 EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
select 2 SLNO,'J113Y-1005' jobcard_no,'P113Y-56' ORDER_VRNO,'FORMING' PROCESS_CODE,0 PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY, 0 EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS FROM DUAL)
SELECT SLNO,JOBCARD_NO,ORDER_VRNO,PROCESS_CODE,PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY,EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS FROM T
i am using
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
version.
thanks.

Just a guess ( with some data changed and an order column added)
with t as
(select 1 SLNO,'J113Y-1004' jobcard_no,'P113Y-56' ORDER_VRNO,'CUTTING' PROCESS_CODE,1 ord,75 PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY,0 EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS      FROM DUAL UNION ALL
select 2,'J113Y-1005','P113Y-56','CUTTING',1,100,0 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
select 1,'J113Y-1004','P113Y-56','DRILLING',2,85,0 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
select 2,'J113Y-1005','P113Y-56','DRILLING',2,0,0 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
select 1,'J113Y-1004','P113Y-56','PUNCHING',3,15,0 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
select 2,'J113Y-1005','P113Y-56','PUNCHING',3,0,0 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
select 1,'J113Y-1004','P113Y-56','FORMING',4,0,0 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
select 2,'J113Y-1005','P113Y-56','FORMING',4,0,0 FROM DUAL
SLNO
JOBCARD_NO
ORDER_VRNO
PROCESS_CODE
ORD
PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY
EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
CUTTING
1
75
0
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
CUTTING
1
100
0
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
DRILLING
2
85
0
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
DRILLING
2
0
0
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
PUNCHING
3
15
0
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
PUNCHING
3
0
0
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
FORMING
4
0
0
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
FORMING
4
0
0
SELECT SLNO,JOBCARD_NO,ORDER_VRNO,PROCESS_CODE,ord,PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY,
       case when slno = 2
            then PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY - lag(PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY ) over (order by ord,slno)
            else PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY
       end EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS
from (SELECT SLNO,JOBCARD_NO,ORDER_VRNO,PROCESS_CODE,ord,
               case when slno = 2
                    then first_value(process_execute_qty) over (order by ord,slno desc)
                    else PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY
               end PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY,
               EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS
          FROM T
order by ord,slno
SLNO
JOBCARD_NO
ORDER_VRNO
PROCESS_CODE
ORD
PROCESS_EXECUTE_QTY
EDIT_UP_TO_EXEPECTED_ANS
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
CUTTING
1
75
75
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
CUTTING
1
100
25
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
DRILLING
2
85
85
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
DRILLING
2
100
15
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
PUNCHING
3
15
15
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
PUNCHING
3
100
85
1
J113Y-1004
P113Y-56
FORMING
4
0
0
2
J113Y-1005
P113Y-56
FORMING
4
100
100
Regards
Etbin

Balance outstanding for contracts

Hi,
For contracts or sales order, does anyone know if there is a report that will show the orginal quantity and balance outstanding?
For single contract, I can use VA43 to click the "status overview" button to get it. Now I need a report to show all.
Many Thanks
Jean

dear chang,
you are right at your hand that open qty = order qty - refernced quantity in subsequence document.
But i was thinking that you are asking open qty for a document(like only for a sales order open item) in that case open qty will be calculated as per my formula open qty = order qty - confirmed qty in the same document.
FYI
Reagrds
hiamnshu

To include a new field " Balance Qty" in the VA05

My requirement is to add a field called "Balance qty" in the VA05 (List of sales order).

Hi,
You have a demo for this note in this link with another field: http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-sd/modifying-oss-message-350068-to-include-po-date-field-304733
For your requirement, my suggestion is:
- Search only for sales order with the right status (VBUP-LFSTA or VBUP-WBSTA).
- After, search in the table VBFA the deliveries for this SO. Be careful with performance, so try note 185530.
- Newly, check the status for delivery (VBUP-WBSTA if I'm right), and then in the new field you can solve the balance qty.
Of course, if you don't know ABAP you need an ABAPer.
I hope this helps you,
Regards,
Eduardo

SAP System inconsistency for Inbound delivery / MIGO and a "sap note"

Hello Friends ,
After following SAP instruction on how to remove the inconsistency between posting GR through MIGO (Inv. mang.) and the reflection of the goods movement status in the inbound delivery document - done that using sap note 570991
the problem is that the system start behaving in a weird way throwing unjustified Error messages for any suggested goods receipt using MIGO with reference to inbound
for example after creating an inbound delivery document and trying to post it via migo , an error will pop up
- Inbound delivery storage location cannot be changed to here Message no. VLA316
the thing is i didn't even maintain any storage location entry up to that point and yet i cannot post any stock !!
also another error like
- Inbound delivery batch cannot be changed to *** here
which doesn't make any sense because there is not batches in the inbound document !!
i think this behavior is coming from the "Document Flow Update for Stock Postings" inbound indicator at the shipping parameter at client level customization
i need help on how to overcome this annoying SAP Bug/Problem specially i am in a post go live critical situation

Hi,
The messages you mentioned were introduced to avoid inconsistency between inbound delivery and IM, through the note: 1050944 - GR for inbound delivery using inventory mgmt as of ECC 6.00
If the messages are issued incorrectly, then you may check for SAP notes (I couldnt find anything relevant) or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
Regards,
AKPT

Is ther a FM to get the open order qty for a particular material &salesorg?

Hi experts,
I have requirement to find the open order qty for a given sales org (plant will be even better ) and material in my report. I do not want to use the standard tables as i need to fetch all records without any time restriction.So it is takin a lot of time.
I know i can find it in va05 but i want to know if ther is some standard function module which can serve this purpose.
Kindly help.
regards
Ashwin

Thanks for the reply,
Can you kindly elaborate what i need to pass to the function module ?
What do I have to pass in the tables LVBMTV and LSELTAB ?
In which field will i get the open quantity for the material and salesorg ?
Kindly help,
Regards
Ashwin

Open Qty for Contracts in Purchasing

Hi,
Is there a standard config for Open Target Quantities for Contracts, as there is for standard POs (there is Open Qty - 0BO_QTY - within the 0PUR_DS03 transformation), but I need to show an Open Target Qty for Contracts.
The value exists within RM06A, field name OFZMG but it is not part of the standard Purchasing extractors, whereas the Target Qty is.
Any advise appreciated.
Thanks,
Scott

Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply.
Yeah, I know how to enhance the standard extractors but the logistics extractors are different where the standard LIS extractors actually contain a whole load of additional fields that you can ehnance via LBWE.
If I enhance these with the append structure and some code, then it could cause issues with enhancing via the standard LBWE in the future.
Thanks,
Scott

Automatic TO Creation for Inbound Deliveries

I would like to have TO created automatically for Inbound delivery for PO.
1) I have set the Automatic TO = A in Mvmt Type 101 for my warehouse in transaction OMKZ.
2) I have set Immediate TO Creation and Mail Control = A for Mvmt Type 101, Mvmt Indicator =B, Mvmt Type 101, TR Create =X for my warehouse in transaction OMKX
3) I have assigned Routine #32 to Application E1 in transaction VOFM
4) I have created output conditon WMTA for delivery type EL with Medium =8 and Date/Time =4.
Tranfer order is not created when the delivery is created via transaction VL34. The output determination analysis indicates that WMTA was ignored because requirement 032 not fulfilled. What am I missing?
Thank you.

Hi Julie Simonds
I believe you are working with Inbound delivery with Item catagory as ELN.
Please check if Relevant for putaway is checked.
Path for your refernce :
SPRO > LE > Shipping > Deliveries > Define Item catagory for deliveries.
Thanks,
Mahesh

New Condition TAble for Inbound Delivery

Hello
i want to maintain a new Condition table for the Inbound delivery picking with the combination of _Delivery type/Plant
so that the Inbound created for the particular plant alone uses the particular output type.
Where in IMG can i configure the new Condition table for this combination for the Inbound delivery ?

Hi,
Go to SPRO > Logistics Execution > Shipping > Basic Shipping Functions > Output Control > Output Determination > Maintain Output Determination for Inbound Deliveries > Here perform following;
- Define Condition Table for Inbound Delivery
- Define Output Types for Inbound Delivery
- Define Access Sequence for Inbound Delivery
- Maintain Output Determination Procedure
- Assign Output Determination Procedures

CLOSING STOCK QTY FOR THE DATE

Hi
Can any body tell, In which table i can find the closing stock qty for the particular date and for the particular material without including intransit stock qty.
Regards
Mani.

Dear Santhosh,
Yes, we tried to take the last MBLNR(Value) of the date from MKPF and Try to use the LBKUM Field from MSEG table. But the LBKUM value is with intransit stock.
So , we failed in that logic to bring the warehouse stock for the date.
Any other suggestions pls.
Regards
Mani.

IDOC for inbound delivery

Hi Gurus,
Pls help me to understand this functionality:
Shipments destined for a Distribution Center will generate ASNu2019s(advance shipping notification) to alert the Distribution Center to the upcoming receipt.
There are two variations of the transaction that will initiate the ASN:
u2022 Receipt of an ASN from a vendor to a Distribution Center will result in the creation of an Inbound Delivery. That Inbound Delivery must be sent to WM via IDOC.
u2022 Shipments from Distribution Center to DC will create an Outbound Delivery from the u201CClose Loadu201D process in Warehouse M. Creation of the Outbound Delivery to another DC is the trigger for the IDOC to WM.
The IDOC to be used could be a variation of the DELVRY03.
My doubts includes:
1. can I use one idoc for both the scenarios?
2. both are outbound idocs or not?
3. Any suggestions how to do this?
Thanks..
SD

>
Shibu David wrote:
> My doubts includes:
> 1. can I use one idoc for both the scenarios?
Yes you can use IDOC DELVRY03 for both scenarios
>
Shibu David wrote:
> 2. both are outbound idocs or not?
No.
ASN sent to DC will be outbound message.
ASN received by DC, which creates Inbound delivery is inbound message.
>
Shibu David wrote:
> 3. Any suggestions how to do this?
As far as I know message type used in SAP for ASN is DESADV.
For inbound ASN use process code DELS and for outbound use DELV

Confirmation control key check for inbound delivery creation

Hi,
Currently, in the Client's company, the process of receiving goods from purchase orders looks like that (SAP-wise):
- create a purchase order,
- receive goods using MIGO and automatically create an inbound delivery,
- pack the delivery and post goods receipt.
Recently, some patches have been installed, including one described by note 1602047 (which basically enforces checking confirmation control keys if goods receipt assignment and goods receipt relevance are activated for inbound deliveries). Note says that it only affects two-step stock transfer and creation of automatic inbound deliveries using SPED output but it seems it also affects other basic processes like PO receipt in MIGO.
Now, when using the old control key (that had MRP-Relevant and GR-Relevant fields checked), the system is unable to automatically create an inbound delivery after the goods receipt is posted with MIGO (with message VL148 - Not possible to create an inbound delivery). I learned that this is because the "GR Assignment" field must be checked in the confirmation control key so it's possible to automatically create aninbound delivery after receiving a purchase order in MIGO.
After changing the confirmation control key to have the missing field checked it's not possible anymore to receive goods from PO in MIGO as the PO requires shipping notification in order to be processed in MIGO thus requiring of manual creation of an inbound delivery.
Is there any way to skip this check so the process would remain the same (this model has been working fine for few years in the Client's system) and the inbound delievery would be created automatically after posting the receipt in MIGO?
Thanks in advance,
Piotr

Hi,
don't know if you found a solution, but we received the following message from SAP:
The advent of the new version requires some attention to the users. It
was necessary to avoid inconsistencies which in the past version the
system was susceptible.
Main Program SAPMM07M
Source code of MM07MLVS
sy-msgid VL sy-msgty E sy-msgno 148
I have checked the process and through debugged I could confirm the
following information SAP is providing to all similar incidents reportedfor us:
Error message VL 148 is issued if in the confirmation control key used
in the purchase order, the fields for MRP-relevance (T163G-KZDIS),
GR relevance (T163G-WEREL) and GR assignment indicator (T163G-WEZUO)
are not set.
The correction of note 1602047 was necessary to avoid inconsistencies
(table EKES) in the purchase order. Without having the GR assignment
(T163G-WEZUO) set, there is no unique reference created between the
purchase order history (table EKBE) and the inbound delivery
confirmation (table EKES) at goods receipt which leads to a problem if
several inbound deliveries exist for the same purchase order.
If you set T163G-WEZUO to 'X', this assures that, for an inbound
delivery, the confirmation record (EKES) belonging to this inbound
delivery (EKES-VBELN) is also accurately updated at goods receipt.
How to solve the issue?
Use a confirmation control key with the GR assignment indicator set
and then create the inbound delivery with VL31N. If you want to be able
to create the inbound delivery with reference to a certain line item in
the PO, use transaction VL34.
If you still want to use transaction MIGO, there is the following
workaround:
- Create a purchase order without any confirmation control key
- Create a goods receipt (GR) in transaction MIGO with reference to this PO and post the GR to a non-HU-managed storage location
- Create a transfer posting with MIGO using movement type 311 to
transfer the goods from the non-HU-managed storage location to the
HU-managed storage location.
As the transfer posting is an additional step for the user, the whole
process could be automated using a partner storage location
(T001l-PARLG) for the GR which then triggers (through a modification)
the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' to create the transfer posting without
user interaction.
I hope to have satisfied you on the reason why it is now happening and
also I believe you can explain to business that it is a new behavior
necessary done from SAP side to avoid worse situations, we are aware of
potential dissatisfaction it might cause. SAP Support is always
available to clarify any issue.
Sorry for not having a more positive answer.
I hope it helps!
Leentje

Balance Qty for inbound

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for