Balance Sheet is different from Trial Balance

Have a client that is on SQL 2005, SAP B1 8.8 PL 10  They are in an audit and when running their Balance Sheet their Purchases Clearing u2013 Allocation Account is showing a $0.01 balance.  Yet when they run the Trial Balance Report it does not show up.  Also when reviewing the journal entries for the Purchases Clearing u2013 Allocation Account there is no discrepancy there.  We have pulled a copy of their DB over to our test box with the same setup and the issue still happens.  Updated to PL 17, still the same issue.  Again the client is in an audit at this time.

Issue was opened with SAP.  There was issue with certain Journal Entries where there is a difference of cents in the Local and the System Currency. However, the System Currency and the local Currency is same i.e. US Dollars.
They sent a script that was run on the clients db to resolve the issue.

Similar Messages

  • Import data from different Excel sheets to different tables

    I have an Excel file which has different sheets(S1,S2,S3) .The columns in the sheet are different. I want to import the data from different sheets to different tables(T1,T2,T3).
    S1 ---> T1
    S2 ---> T2
    S3 ---> T3
    I want only one Excel data source in my SSIS package.

    You need to have different DFT flows for that as the metadata is different. You need to map each sheets to corresponding destination tables and then it would work fine
    Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
    Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
    Visakh
    My Wiki User Page
    My MSDN Page
    My Personal Blog
    My Facebook Page

  • Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset

    Dear experts,
    I have creted one main asset . and i have created group asset. and my main asset class and group asset class are both are different.If i continue that error assets are shoud be craeted .but the depreciation key and usefull life and ordinary depreciation will going and it's showing grey.
    My question at the time of assighning the group asset for the particular assets the below error is comming.
    Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset
    Message no. AA810
    Diagnosis
    The account allocation 14000 of the group asset 140000001 0 is different from account allocation 1000 of the asset.
    System Response
    This error needs to be corrected for balance sheet valuation (usually determined in depreciation area 01). For all other depreciation areas, this is only a warning you should check.
    Procedure
    Check your entry. When an individual asset has a different account assignment than the group asset, it is not possible to reconcile the individual asset to the group asset in reporting by means of accounts.
    kindly help on this issue
    regards
    venkataswamy

    Hi sudhakar
    Thanks for your reply
    1) for example i have buliding asset class and i have one group asset class.under the building asset account determination i have assighned the gl a/c for both b/s and book deprecitaion
    In groups asset class also i have done same things. i have craeted asset under building asset class and created one asset under group assets.
    then assighned the group asset to main assets. the error is comming like this Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset
    I have serched in sdn forum and service .sap.com . they are saying you can use same gl a/c for both asset class.for depreciation .i have tried this scenario. still i am getting the same error and same problem.
    The most important thing is we are working on ECC 6 versions
    sap note 76186.
    Kindly help me
    Regards
    venkataswamy
    Edited by: venkataswamy bathini on Jul 6, 2009 9:22 AM

  • Asset subledger differs from GL

    Hi gurus,
    the accumulated depreciation in the asset sub-ledger differs from the trial balance. can anyone tell me what the problem could be or how i can rectify this?

    Hi,
    I've got the same problem also. I've check on ABST and the result is ok, no difference between FI-GL and AA. This is after depreciation run. Is   it possible that some data might not be updated during depreciation posting, either in GL or AA?
    Thanks a lot for the advise.
    Best Regards,
    CW

  • Why when I open my raw files into lightroom, colors are different from my camera's preview?

    Ciao,
    I have a problem... maybe this can be a stupid question but anyway.. I would like to know the reason why when I open a raw image in lightroom, for a second I see the right colors/tone/contrast that i see when i look at the same images on my camera and soon after the word "Loading" I see the raw files with different colors.
    Why this happens???
    Before "Loading" and --> after
    Thank you so much

    Hey Giuseppe
    I have a similar problem but the cause may be different from yours. I shoot a Canon 6D and as far as I know no one with the 5D MKIII has my issue, but maybe you could look into it.
    Canon's Adobe Camera Raw in Photoshop CC, as well as Lightroom CC, is automatically down converting my CR2 RAW files from 14 bit color depth to 8 bit color depth. This is screwing up my colors, contrast, gradients, etc quite a bit when trying to process RAW files in Photoshop CC and Lightroom CC.
    You can read my thread here:
    Banding due to automatic downconverting of RAW files to 8 bit
    You might want to check and see if your RAW files are actually being processed in 16 bit color depth. There is a possibility that they are being down converted automatically for some reason.
    The bit depth in Lightroom for RAW files is supposed to be 16 bit but when opening my files it just converts it down.
    Try downloading Canon's Digital Photo Professional 4
    Canon U.S.A. : Consumer & Home Office : EOS 5D Mark III
    Use that software to process a RAW photo and convert to a 16 bit TIFF. I know this software truly gives you a 16 bit depth image. Then compare the result side to side with what you're seeing in Lightroom.
    If you are having this issue, I have not yet found a way to process RAW CR2 files in ACR or Lightroom and maintain 16 bit depth.
    If you are batch processing to JPEGs it probably doesn't matter, but my issue is that it is down converting BEFORE exporting and thus any edits I do become much more destructive on my 8 bit image than they would if I was editing a 16 bit image. I have to be able to keep things in 16 bit up until the point they go to the printer.
    Sorry, this may not help you at all, it looks like there could just be a difference in White Balance, but I figured I'd throw my two cents out there and maybe you could see if this is actually what is happening for you, and hopefully eventually Adobe could potentially fix this bug.

  • NIKON D5000 NEF - Lightroom 2.6 and PSE show colors quite differently from what Nikon Software show

    With my Nikon D5000 DSLR camera, I took recently photos from small blue flowers. I had set-up my Nikon D5000 to create for every photo both a NEF File and a JPEG File (and had set my camera to use Automatic While Balance). 
    I noticed that for NEF Files Lightroom 2.6 (and also PSE 7, that uses internally Camera RAW ) shows me the blue colors of the flowers quite differently from what I see with PSE for the jpeg file. It is my impression, that it is in the Jpeg files, that the blue color is close to the reality; and  that it is with the NEF Files that Lightroom and PSE show a blue color that is quite different from the reality.
    I also looked at the photo files with the NIKON "View Nx" 1.3.0 Software that came with my camera. With "View Nx" the blue colors (both with the NEF file and the Jpeg File) are very vlose that what i see with PSE 7 in the jpeg file (and quite different from what I see with LR and PSE for the .NEF File).
    I mentioned this problem to Nikon Support. They suggested, that Nikon Software and Adobe software use different algorithms; and that the Nikon algorithms are better/closer adapted to the Nikon cameras than the more generalized Adobe algorithms that need to support a very large number of cameras.
    But ....it is Lightroom that i wish to use to process my NEF Files and PSE that I wish to use to organize my Photos. Can a LR/Camera-RAW expert help me? I would like to find a solution to see with LR and with PSE in my D5000 NEF Photo Files blue colors that are close to the reality and close to what Nikon Software shows me on my PC. Please notice that I am very far away from being a professional and that i will probably not understand complicated explanations.
    Thanks a lot in advance.
    An additional note, that is perhaps not relevant: I used LR to convert my NEF File into a JPEG File format and looked at the blue in the result. It looks the same as what LR and PSE show me for the .NEF File (and looks different from the jpeg file crreated by the NIKON camera).

    EJ and Jim
    Thank You very much for your useful feedback.
    I realize, that as a neophit I am an exot among the community of photo-experts and photo-professionals addressed by LR.  Therefore the wish that I will now express is perhaps inadequate. But since it is gently, that i express this wish, I am probably allowed to do so......
    My wish for a future version of LR, is that LR comes out of the box with a "reasonable" interpretation of the RAW images of most important/widespread modern cameras....without requiring that non-experts like me gets confronted from the very beginning with the need to develop their own default settings.
    For this wish, I will formulate a Feature Request.
    You might wonder, why a non-expert like me is interested in LR instead of  using those Photo-Editing Software (e.g. PSE) that are supposed to address the need of non-experts. Well..... I am coming from the PSE world. I am reasolnably happy with the PSE Organizer....but  I hate the complex, inefficient, unfriendli "user-interface" (experts will probably tell: workflow-interface?) of the PSE Editor. Its really a last-century Software. LR is so much more friendly, even for non-experts...within the Library Module, i do not need to switch back and forth between one dialogue-window for each type of change.... nearly all what i need is in that one right-hand pane of the Library module.
    I honestly believe, that Adobe should take a serious look at promoting/marketing  LR also to the audience of non-experts. That would be a good and attractive additional marketing opportunity for LR.

  • Listener listners to name different from instance_name

    Is it possible to configure listener to lister to a name different from instance_name?
    For example, if instance_name is INST1, I'd like to make listener be able to listen to name "INST" and know that this is for "INST1"
    If possible, this is what TNSNAME at client is
    INST =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS_LIST =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = host)(PORT = 1521))
    (CONNECT_DATA =
    (SID = INST)
    Thanks

    Thanks for your reply. Actually my concern is much at client side not on database server side. Please let me expalin what I mean.
    The back-end database is 2-node RAC - Two instances INST1 and INST2 on node1 and node2 respectively. Most of our clients will use TAF (Transparent Application Failover) config and use SERVICE_NAME=INST in TNSNAMES.ora. They have no issue connection to RAC database and take advantage of fail over and load baclancing capability.
    However, one of clients is legacy app. :-( It does not use oracle client (so not using TNSNAME). It has its own db driver. The only option I allow to enter is hostname + SID. This would work fine with stand alone database (one host + one instance), or I can even connection to specific RAC node (like node 1 + SID=INST1).
    But we'd like to take advantage of fail over of having two instances. We would like to connection to one instance and if in case node fails, it will go to other.
    We can have a virtual hotname using 3rd party load balancer - it will go to the least load node with host name translation - user connects to virtual host > translate to node 1 or node 2 depending on load. . But since listener on node 1 is listenning to SID_NAME=INST1 and node 2 to INST2, using SID=INST at client in tnsname.ora would not work (get error "ORA-12505: TNS:listener does not currently know of SID", nor I could use SID=INST1 or SID=INST2 becuase it won't be transparent when failover. Ideally I want to use SID=INST in TNSNAMES.ora and, if possible, I'd like the listener on node 1 listens to INST1 as well as INST and node2 listners to INST2 as well as INST. This way client connection will be transparent. Sorry for long explanation. But hopefully I make my situation clearer. Thanks again in advance.

  • Color shift going from trial version to full version CS5

    Hi guys, I have just gone from trial version of CS5 master collection to a full version of master collection CS5 on my PC.
    My trial expired so I uninstalled it completely, then reinstalled fresh from the CS5 DVD. I also updated all of the programs straight after the install. (something which I don't think I did with the trial version).
    My problem now is though I am experiencing quite a big color shift from what the trial version was showing me to what my full version is showing me. (Yes I have checked the color settings, they are all pretty much default North American General Purpose 2)
    In the trial version the colors were correct, but now my file I am working on my "mouve blue have moved into almost a purple appearance."
    Also if I go into acrobat and open the PDF version of the file I was previously working on the colors are also displaying incorrectly when opening the PDF that was created in the trial (which was displaying correct when using the trial). So I guess its not just PS related.
    I have a laptop which is also running a trial version of master collection, and when I copy my file to this machine and open the colors are spot on how they should be (just like they were prior to me going full version) which tells me something has definatley changed in this installed full version of CS5 for me.
    Not sure what I should do, unstall the software and reinstall it without doing the updates?
    PS. Under color managment / advanced, windows color system defaults, my Device profile is: System Default (sRGB IEC61966-2.1)
    Viewing conditions profile: System default (WCS profile for sRGB viewing conditions)
    I havent changed anything there anyway in any install.
    Any help would be great

    Some key points to help understand why you might be seeing what you are:
    When color-management is set up properly with a wide gamut monitor, sRGB images can seem dull and lifeless compared to wider gamut images such as those expressed in Adobe RGB or ProPhoto RGB.
    Not all apps are color-managed, so with e.g. a wide gamut monitor you'll see a significant visual difference between the same image displayed via a color-managed app such as Photoshop and a non-color-managed app such as Internet Explorer 8 and earlier.  Even though the color-managed applications may be displaying accurate color, many folks feel the inconsistency is "wrong" as compared to when more different apps display the same colors, which will happen with sRGB as the monitor profile (which is the Windows default).
    People often consider more vibrant, saturated color "better".
    Color management often does not actually work properly.  Not all profiles are created equal, even properly formatted monitor profiles may not accurately express the monitor's capabilities, and not all color management in applications is done properly.  You're not the first to report problems with a canned Dell monitor profile.
    -Noel

  • Upgrading from Trial version to Developer Edition

    We installed SQL server 2014 trial edition in 2014 and the trial period just expired. No longer access SQL server 2014. Also in 2014 I purchased the SQL server 2014 Developer Edition.
    I go in the maintenance section of SQL server 2014 and try to upgrade by entering my product key and get an error message that my product key is not valid. I called Microsoft and two different employees confirmed my product key is good.
    Should I be able to upgrade from Trial version to Developer Edition by simply entering my product key?
    Thank you

    Hi cguay01,
    As other post, you should be able to upgrade from Trial Edition to Developer Edition by entering product key from SQL Server setup wizard, you can follow the steps in this similar
    blog. You can also use the following command lines to upgrade SQL Server 2014 Trial to a full version.
    Setup.exe /q /ACTION=editionupgrade /INSTANCENAME=<MSSQLSERVER or instancename> /PID=<PID key for new edition>" /IACCEPTSQLSERVERLICENSETERMS
    According to your description, the issue that “product key is not valid” might be caused by several reasons such as corrupted installation file, antivirus scanning and so on. There are some proposals for you troubleshooting this issue.
    1. Please ensure that your SQL Server installation file is not corrupted. If you are using ISO download, please copy the content of the ISO image to the local disk on your computer and upgrade SQL Server from there.
    2. Make sure you use corresponding license key matched the edition and version of SQL Server.
    3. Make sure that you don’t exceed the limit of allowed activations of the product key.
    4. Turn off any Anti-virus software when upgrading SQL Server.
    There is also a similar thread for your reference.
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/bdd94577-515c-49fa-be44-008eacece057/installing-sql-server-2012-on-a-new-vm-error-code-0x858c0017?forum=sqlsetupandupgrade
    Thanks,
    Lydia Zhang
    Lydia Zhang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Is Photoshop CS6 different from CS5?

    I recently went back to school to expand my career skills and the next class in line for me, is Photoshop. I’m trying to find out if I’m OK with CS5 or if I need to upgrade to CS6. As I just mentioned, I currently have CS5. For a couple classes I completed this year (Flash and Dreamweaver), I was able to use CS5 without any issue, limitations, or instances of “Yeah that can be done, but only on CS6.” I also did not have instances in the class lessons of “You can do this, but not if you’re on CS5.” However, from what I heard/read, Photoshop seems to have had the most significant changes in the CS6 update.
    Here are my questions:
    Please, from a technical perspective only, do I need to upgrade to CS6?  Will being on CS5 on my home computer put me at a disadvantage in class when I'm being taught via CS6? Is Photoshop CS6 significantly different from CS5 where if being taught via CS6, I would be lost or very limited on CS5? When you upgraded to CS6 did you feel like you were learning a new program, or was it the same as CS5, just with a few new “nice to have” features?
    Again, please provide information from a technical perspective only. If the decision to spend $2000 for CS6, was based on preference, I would have had CS6 a long time ago. Also, please don’t recommend CC because I’m not ready to upgrade to subscription based software yet.
    Thanks!

    Have you tried running the trial version of CS6 for 30 days to get a feel for the software and perhaps answer for yourself the many questions you obviously have?
    Try http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cs6-product-downloads.html
    Or http://prodesigntools.com/adobe-cs6-direct-download-links.html

  • How can I switch from trial to real account?

    I have an Adobe Connect 8 trial account, and I want to subscribe to the monthly plan.
    Clicking on 'Service plan' in my trial account gives me a blank screen
    https://connectpro98695833.adobeconnect.com/admin/administration/service-plan?account-id=M YACCOUNTID
    The 'Login' link (for existing Adobe connect trial customers) on this page is broken
    https://service.acrobat.com/cfusion/bots/purchase/index.cfm
    On this page, it says 'NOTE: If you are a Trial customer, please login into your existing account so that any meeting content you created can be maintained'.
    But I have an Adobe Connect account, which differs from the Adobe ID.
    All this stuff is very confusing. Calling the helpdesk they say my order has to be processed online and that they only help North American customers.
    Aaaaaargh......!
    Can anyone help me becoming a Adobe Connect customer?

    +1.
    I had the same issue, so all I could do was create a new account.
    Now I have both an expired trial account and an active account, and have to pick which I need when I log in.
    Something is obviously broken with the process.

  • Is there a way to "print" a raster image to a size differing from the artboard, just as w/vectors?

    when you print from illustrator you can specify to fit a paper size
    that's different from the artboard being used. I want raster images that differ in size from the artboard - is this
    possible? Or would figuring out the pixels based on a dpi and a sheet size be the equivalent?

    I'm not clear what you describe. Sounds to me like you are confusing the rasterization on the printer/ in the printer driver with actually resizing. All that happens when you fit content on a page for printing is to change the overall ratio of paper vs. content vs. rasterization grid and that is a mere technical thing. Works for vectors and bitmaps. however, AI having a track record of being extremely picky about what it prints, you'd probably do better saving a PDF and printing from Acrobat.
    Mylenium

  • PS CS5 Image Display Differs From Used ICC Profile In Win 7

    Hi,
    on my Windows 7 Ultimate x64 machine, I just calibrated my Dell SP2309W monitor using an i1DisplayPro and basICColor 5, creating a ICC v2 profile (I am aware of the problems under Windows with ICC v4 profiles).
    It created the ICC profile and applied it to be used by Windows. I double checked under COLOR MANAGEMENT that the new ICC profile is being used. Although I can see that the new ICC is being used (desktop appearance changes), there are a few issues I am experiencing:
    (1.) Windows Photo Viewer
    The thumbnails in Windpows Explorer look fine (they DO use the new ICC profile), when I double click a jpeg and open the image it DOES NOT use the new ICC profile. When I click the PLAY SLIDESHOW button (starting the slideshow) in the opened image in Windows Photo Viewer, the images DO use the new ICC profile.
    (2.) Internet Browsers
    All current internet browser (Firefox, IE, Safari and Chrome) DO use the new ICC profile and display the image correctly.
    (3.) Photoshop CS 5
    When I open the same image - that Windows Photo Viewer does not correctly displays (according to the new ICC profile) - in Photoshop CS5, I get the same image display that Windows Photo Viewer gives me (when not thumbnail or not in slideshow mode) - it appears to be the sRGB display.
    My color settings in PS CS5 are: North America General Purpose 2 > sRGB IEC 61966-2.1.
    When I go to View > Proof Setup > Monitor RGB I get the image display using the new ICC profile.
    Why does the image look different in PS than my calibrated monitor should output ?
    I was under the impression (please correct me if I am wrong), that the sole purpose for calibrating my monitor was to get a uniform display across (ICC aware) applications. Even when one applies different color spaces to a document in PS, I thought the output on my calibrated screen done by the graphic card should always be according to my calibration and the settings in the ICC profile being used.
    What Am I doing wrong or what am I misunderstanding ?
    Any help or input is appreciated !
    Thanks.
    - M

    Hello,
    A note on monitor calibration: calibrating your monitor will not guarentee that every application will display color correctly, it's more of a step along the pipeline, and for the preview part of a color workflow it's the last step.  Here's how color translation follows for an ICC workflow when previewing to a monitor:
    Image Color Numbers > Document Tag or Workspace Profile > Monitor Profile
    For non-color managed applications, if the original document is or isn't tagged with a color profile it will be translated directly to the monitor profile anyway.  This is the equivalent in Photoshop of selecting "Monitor" in soft proofing.  Selecting monitor in softproofing will bypass the tagged or workspace profile to translate colors directly through the monitor profile.
    For most automatic color managed applications (like Firefox), the image will be translated through the tagged profile and then sent through the monitor profile.  If the image is untagged or the profile is unrecognized, the colors get sent directly to the monitor profile.
    For Photoshop, a tagged document will have its profile respected and then sent to the monitor.  An untagged document will be assigned the workspace profile, which acts like a temporary document profile, and then gets sent to the monitor.  This is often why users will notice Photoshop behaves differently from other applications.  It's usually a case of the workspace coming into play.  By default the workspace profile is set to sRGB.  You can change this in Edit > Color Settings.
    The purpose of the workspace is originally for printing workflows, as a way of keeping consistant color translations when dealing with both tagged and untagged documents.  For web output workflows it can be useful for viewing everything through sRGB, which is typical of the average monitor output (not so with newer wide-gamut monitors, another source of confusion...) combined with the fact that originally most web browsers were not color managed.  Hence viewing everything through sRGB is pretty close to what most monitors see and what untagged/unmanaged docs will look like.
    Monitor calibration is useful only because it brings your monitor output to a "known state".  In traditional workflows the monitor was always a middle-man, a preview device which was useful for getting an idea of what the printed output would look like before you print it.  Since print colorspaces are often smaller than display spaces, it's feasible and useful to narrow down the monitor/display space and calibrate it to a known state, so that even if it doesn't totally match the print, you'll get used to its differences/limitations and they'll be consistent so long as the calibration is maintained.
    For web output, your final output is often another user's computer monitor, which can have any form of behavior (most standard monitors are pretty close to sRGB, or use sRGB as an operating system workspace (default monitor profile).  Wide gamuts behave differently, but I'm not sure if there's a particular ICC space that they closely match, or if different wide-gamuts are even that close to each other in their display color spaces.
    Hope this helps!

  • Quantity is different from sale order and delivery

    Hi,
    Gurus,
    Quantity is different from sale order and delivery.
    I identified the Material in the sales order, the item category for this material as BOM.
    I have also checked the bill of material display header overview. The Base Quantity maintained as 1000 EA3. The SUBITEM maintained in G in the unit field in bill of material display.
    Accordingly i have checked the same for material master's additionl data in Units of Measure tab, it is mentioned the basic unit as 1000 EA3 and alternative unit as 600 G.
    My client processed the order for 100 QTY. The QTY for the two sub item is 99.601 each in the sale order.
    My client Question is why in delivery the Material Qty is coming as 99.730 and the SUB ITEM is coming as 99.330 EACH.
    Note:- The material X is maintained in EA3 in Bill of material header overview. I do no how the sale unit came as G for the Material in sale order.
    The other two sub item is perfectly coming as G. Because it is maintained in G in the Bill of Material Display.
    Guide me GURUS.
    Thanks and Regards,
    ANAND

    Hello Rumar
    I guess you entered the text manually in the sales order. The Ship-to may not be having any text, but the Sold-to may be and it may be coming from sold to.
    In transaction VOTXN, check the access sequence for the text type id and see which one takes precedence - one from customer master or from the order by checking the order of accesses.

  • ALV GRID - Handling selected rows? Sorting in OUTTAB is different from ALV

    Dear Experts ,
    I have a transaction with ALV grid. I have defined several application specific functions to the ALV grid tool bar. My requirement is to handle the ALV tool bar functions only for the selected rows.
    Code snippet:
    DATA:
    LS_GRID_DS TYPE TYS_DS.
    TYPES: BEGIN OF TYS_DS.
    INCLUDE   TYPE TYS_ALVGRID.
    TYPES: STRUCNAME LIKE DD02L-TABNAME.
    TYPES: PRETAB    TYPE ZTAB_T,
           OUTTAB    TYPE ZTAB_T,
           OUTTAB_HIDDEN TYPE ZTAB_T,
           OUTTAB_SUM TYPE ZTAB_T,
           OUTTAB_ROLLBACK TYPE ZTAB_T,
           END OF TYS_DS.
      LOOP AT ls_grid_ds-marked_rows INTO ss_index_split
           WHERE rowtype IS INITIAL.
    ( Marked rows is correctly giving the row numbers of the highlighted rows)
    READ TABLE ls_grid_ds-outtab INTO ss_sel_rows_ds_split
                   INDEX ss_index_split-index.
    ISSUE : Sorting in ls_grid_ds-outtab internal table is different from ALV Grid display.
    Hence, though ls_grid_ds-marked_rows giving correct rows, I am not able to handle the my requirement correctly.
    Why sorting in gs_grid_ds-outtab is different from ALV display? How can they made in sync?
    Thank you in Advance.
    Sravan.
    Edited by: Raja Sravan on Jan 16, 2009 1:13 AM

    Hello Raja
    The OUTTAB is usually in sync with the display on the frontend grid control because it is a CHANGING parameter (of method SET_TABLE_FOR_FIRST_DISPLAY).
    Question: Do you "feed" ls_grid_ds-outtab to the parameter IT_OUTTAB of method SET_TABLE_FOR_FIRST_DISPLAY?
    If not then it is obvious why you get discrepancies.
    Regards
      Uwe

Maybe you are looking for