Balancing issue in POSDM

Hi Aram,
There is a requirement for count/value check in POSDM when the balancing issue occurs.
If the line items of a tender type is small, this could be done by manual check but is difficult for a tender type with large number of line items.
As per findings this can be achieved by the FM -/POSDW/SEARCH_TLOG. But this isn't in compatible extract manner to collect the output. It would be helpful if this can be developed as a report/table extract.
Please suggest if there are other options as the table /POSDW/TLOGS too has the transaction data which is merged.
Thanks and Regards,
Ramesh D

Hi Ramesh,
Still I didn't get what you are trying to achieve.
If you just want to find tenders with value 0 in any specific date/store/pos combination you can use cubes in BW to get the result.
Definitely you will get transaction number and transaction type there itself.
So you can achieve this with simple BEx query. If you are using standard cube you may try it with 0rpa_c01/c21.
If you can elaborate more with examples or screenshot (where you get balancing issue and what you would kike to capture in that case) would be easy to understand.
Thanks,
Vikrant.

Similar Messages

Need help in Payroll Tax Balance Issue - Urgent

Hi,
Please help me with the following Tax and Balance issue. The system is on 12.0.3, South African Legislation.
Issue : Salary has been restructured from Basic Salary to Total package structure in Dec 2008. Retro Pay was used to pay the difference amounts in Dec Run. But while configuring the new Elements for this Total Package they have missed out adding the Retro Elements to Proper Tax calculating Balances.
Eg : "TP Salary" element is fed to "Taxable Income RFI" balance but "TP Retro Salary" element is not fed to this balance.
So tax has not been calculated for those Retro amounts. This has been identified while validating test run for IRP5 tax certificates.
The Feb 09 (Feb is the Tax year End for payroll) Payroll was already run on 10th and payments were already done. Now we need to tax the retro amounts and retrieve the balance tax amounts from Employees.
I added the proper tax balances to those Retro elements and and the balances were adjusted to add the Retro amounts. Then I ran the Feb run the payroll again as of 20th, it did not recalculate the tax.
How to recalculate the tax so that correct tax reflects in the Tax certificates? Please help me with the necessary Info.
Thanks,
Sri.

Hi,
As I mentioned earlier, I added the appropriate balances which are used to calculate Tax to Retro Elements and those Balances got updated with the delta amount but Tax was not updated. I want to know is there any process provided by Oracle using which Tax for those already paid amounts can be recalculated.
I calculated the Tax manually and using Adjust Balance form added ZA_TAX_BALANCE_ADJUSTMENT Element and given the difference tax amount in PAYE and Tax Input values and saved the form. The Tax got updated.
Tax_ASG_RUN - 15000
Tax_ASG_TAX_YTD - 153257.32 (Prev - 138257.32). When I run the IRP5 (Tax Certificate Process) the tax is also getting correctly on it.
But client wants Oracle to calculate the Tax for those retro amounts so thats the challenge.
Could you help me with this.
Thanks,
Sri

ITS load balancing issue

Hi all,
During our testing we are getting a load balancing issue. However, one of the agates in our network is has more CPU power than compared to the other agates in our ITS network. The memory on all the agate servers is the same.
Our current issue we are getting is the one agate that has more cpu power but acquires more sessions as compared to the other two agates. It roughly gets 60 more sessions per agate process as compare to the other Agate servers. Does having more cpu on a Agate affect the load balancing on ITS? We are on ITS patch level 19 with the Hotfix.
Thanks,
Jin Bae

Hello Jin,
yes, at (re)initialize the WGate retrieves the capacity from the AGates.
This is an accumulated number based on CPU performance and the number of CPUs!
The number can be seen in "wgate-status" as the "Capacity" of the AGate.
When running multiprocess Agates the number is retrieved from the MManager and also involves the number of agate-processes.
The WGate dispatches the load in proportion depending on these capacity numbers.
By my knowledge there is no way that these values can be configured (fixed).
Regards,
Fekke

SIP load balancing issue with ACE 4710

SIP Load balancing Issue with ACE 4710
I have a Cisco ace 4710 with vesion Version A4(2.2). i configued simple SIP load balancing first without stickiness. without stikeiness we are having a problem because bye packet at the was not going to the same server all the time that left our port in used even though user hang up the phone. its happen randmly. i have a total 20 licenced ports and its fill out very quickly. so i dicided to use the stickiness with call-ID but still same issue. below is the config
rserver host CIN-VOX-31
ip address 172.20.130.31
inservice
rserver host CIN-VOX-32
ip address 172.20.130.32
inservice
serverfarm host CIN-VOX
probe SIP-5060
rserver CIN-VOX-31
    inservice
rserver CIN-VOX-32
    inservice
sticky sip-header Call-ID VOX_SIP_GROUP
timeout 1
timeout activeconns
replicate sticky
serverfarm CIN-VOX
class-map match-all CIN_VOX_L4_CLASS
2 match virtual-address 172.22.12.30 any
class-map match-all CIN_VOX_SIP_L4_CLASS
2 match virtual-address 172.22.12.30 udp eq sip
policy-map type loadbalance sip first-match CIN_VOX_LB_SIP_POLICY
class class-default
    sticky-serverfarm VOX_SIP_GROUP
policy-map multi-match GLOBAL_DMZ_POLICY
   class CIN_VOX_SIP_L4_CLASS
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy CIN_VOX_LB_SIP_POLICY
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply
class CIN_VOX_L4_CLASS
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy CIN_VOX_LB_SIP_POLICY
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply
interface vlan 20
description VIP_DMZ_VLAN
ip address 172.22.12.4 255.255.255.192
alias 172.22.12.3 255.255.255.192
peer ip address 172.22.12.5 255.255.255.192
access-group input PERMIT-ANY-LB
service-policy input GLOBAL_DMZ_POLICY
could you please help me on this...
thanks
Rakesh Patel

I mean there should be one more statement-
class-map type sip loadbalance match-any CIN_VOX_LB_SIP_POLICY
match sip header Call_ID header-value sip:
and that will be called under-
policy-map multi-match GLOBAL_DMZ_POLICY
   class CIN_VOX_SIP_L4_CLASS
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy CIN_VOX_LB_SIP_POLICY
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply
is that missing in your config ?

CSS arrowpoint cookie load balancing issue

Hi guys,
I need some advice on a load balancing issue.
We have connections hitting the CSS via a proxy environment. As a result i see only one source ip address. I want to use arrowpoint cookies for session stickeyness. However when i enable the rule the tcp session negotiation fails. The CSS sends a TCP/RST which terminates the session.
Here's the rule config:
content HTTP_rule
add service ZSTS299102
add service ZSTS281101
vip address <filtered>
add service LONS299102
add service LONS281101
balance weightedrr
change service ZSTS299102 weight 5
change service ZSTS281101 weight 5
advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
protocol tcp
port 80
url "/*"
active
Any help would be much appreciated.

Remko,
in L3/L4 the CSS sends the SYN directly to the server.
So when the FIN comes in, we simply pass it to the server.
With L5 the CSS spoofs the connection and we select the server only after receiving the GET.
If there was some delay between the GET and the FIN, the CSS would have time to establish a connection with the server and the FIN could be simply forwarded.
Unfortunately, in this case the FIN is right after the GET with no delay.
Gilles.

Ongoing White Balance issue

In a video I just shot there is a slight shift in exposure in the image - just when my subject moves a couple times. It is shot with a white background and she is wearing black. I think this is a white balance issue. Which filters or fixes are best for this? I have tried a few filters and they mostly do it but you can still see the couple times my subject moves and the light/exposure changes. I realize that I need to film it better, but can it be fixed. Thanks for any insights.

Search for "flicker fixer premiere pro". I don't use any of them so you will have to see what works best for you.
You can use the Fast Color corrector in PP to change exposure. You will have to make key frames. If you're not sure how to use key frames and how to use the Fast Color corrector it's time to open the manual.

Audio L/R Balance Issue

I'm having a problem. Ive got audio coming through both ears but the Right ear is much louder than the Left. I've tried 2 pairs of headphones which I have tested to see if they work and they do. If I do need it repairing what part needs replacing? Or is there a way of fixing this myself?

Is the audio balance issue there no matter what earphones you use? Is it on every song? It could be the songs themselves that are the problem. If you have access to another iPod like yours where you can put your songs on and listen to them on there you can determine if it is the songs or it only happens on your iPod. If it sounds the same no matter what earphones you use on yours then it's pretty safe to assume that it is not the earphones. As for repairing it yourself...guess that would depend on how handy you think you may be and the ability for you to get what ever part(s) needed. It could be the headphone jack that has an issue but that is a random guess.

Limit Order Confirmation Reversal - Balancing Issues

Hello,
We currently use SRM 5.5 and have an issue with the balances on our goods receipts and service entries for limit orders.
We use ML81N to reverse off our service entry sheets but it is still leaving balances on the goods receipt which appears to be caused by the invoice values.
For example we have a limit PO that has had the following happen:
Confirmation posted in SRM for £3390.00 which transferred successfully to the backend PO.
Invoice posted for £3371.70
Service entry revoked and deleted using ML81Nu2013 SEN balance is zero
Goods receipt balance is £18.30, only the value of £3371.70 has been reversed but before saving the service entry reversal the value in ML81N did show as £3390.00. So for some reason it is picking up the invoice value and reversing that instead of the goods receipt value.
Does anyone know why this is happening and a way to get rid of the balance on the goods receipt now that the service entry sheet is deleted?
Thanks
Lisa

Hi. This is probably more of a LIV / MM issue than SRM, but transaction MR11 will clear the GR/IR imbalance for you if there is no other way. It effectively posts a document like a dummy GR or invoice for the balance. It obviously won't try and pay anything to anyone.
Regards,
Dave.

Load-balancing issues with iPlanet and multiple clusters

We're in performance test of a large-scale clustered deployment based on WLS 5.1sp10.
Due to scalability/functionality issues, some of which we've seen firsthand and
some of which we've been informed of by associates as well as BEA representatives,
we've chosen to implement multiple clusters with a maximum of three nodes each.
These clusters will be fronted by a web server tier consisting of iPlanet servers
using the proxy plugin.
Due to hardware constraints (both in test and in production), however, we've configured
the iPlanet servers to route across the multiple clusters. In our test environment,
for instance, we've got a single iPlanet server routing across two 3-node clusters,
and the configuration in obj.conf is as follows:
<Object name="application" ppath="*/application">
Service fn="wl-proxy" \
WebLogicCluster="clusterA_1:9990,clusterB_1:9991,clusterA_2:9990,clusterB_2:9991,clusterA_3:9990,
clusterB_3:9991" \
CookieName="ApplicationSession"
</Object>
Our issue is that the load-balancing doesn't appear to work across the clusters.
We're seeing one cluster get about 90% of the load, while the other receives
only 10%.
So, the question (finally!) is: Is this configuration correct (i.e., will it
work according to the logic of the proxy plugin), and is it appropriate for this
situation? Are there other alternative approaches that anyone can recommend?
Thanks in advance,
cramer

I use weblogic6.1 with sp2+windows 2000.I develop a web application and deploy
it to cluster.Through HttpClusterServlets proxy of weblogic I found that a server
in cluster almost get 95% of requests but another only get 5% of requests.Why???
I don't set any special parameter.And the weight of the two clustered server is
equal.I use round-robin arithmetic.
Thanks!
"cramer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
We're in performance test of a large-scale clustered deployment based
on WLS 5.1sp10.
Due to scalability/functionality issues, some of which we've seen firsthand
and
some of which we've been informed of by associates as well as BEA representatives,
we've chosen to implement multiple clusters with a maximum of three nodes
each.
These clusters will be fronted by a web server tier consisting of iPlanet
servers
using the proxy plugin.
Due to hardware constraints (both in test and in production), however,
we've configured
the iPlanet servers to route across the multiple clusters. In our test
environment,
for instance, we've got a single iPlanet server routing across two 3-node
clusters,
and the configuration in obj.conf is as follows:
<Object name="application" ppath="*/application">
Service fn="wl-proxy" \
WebLogicCluster="clusterA_1:9990,clusterB_1:9991,clusterA_2:9990,clusterB_2:9991,clusterA_3:9990,
clusterB_3:9991" \
CookieName="ApplicationSession"
</Object>
Our issue is that the load-balancing doesn't appear to work across the
clusters.
We're seeing one cluster get about 90% of the load, while the other
receives
only 10%.
So, the question (finally!) is: Is this configuration correct (i.e.,
will it
work according to the logic of the proxy plugin), and is it appropriate
for this
situation? Are there other alternative approaches that anyone can recommend?
Thanks in advance,
cramer

Color Balance Issue importing from DV Deck Via Firewire...

The fact that searching google and this formum has lead to me finding NO results, I am wondering whether anyone has or is experiencing similar issues..
For some time now, I have been having this issue, which I just realized is not normal. I have a Sony DV Cam Deck which I use to import via Firewire to Premiere CS5.5. Attached to the Sony Deck I also have a small monitor connected to the composite video output.
The color and white balance look fine on the small monitor, however on the import via firewire, there is tinge through it almost like an incorrect white balance.
YES, I have calibrated and Re-Calibrated my Computer monitors using Spyder3 and when viewing photos and other video not imported through the deck, the color is great.. .It is NOT a problem with the Deck because the SAME thing happens with a friends Deck. I am just using the standard Firewire import on the ASUS Motherboard, although I do have a Blackmagic Studio2 card. This does not really come into it during firewire import....
As I said, now that I realized, this has been happening for 2 years or more. I was always color correcting the camera mans footage thinking his whitebalance was out, but after now attaching an external monitor to the Deck whilst firewire import, I notice the color is fine on the monitor. I am in PAL land Australia, but it happens with NTSC footage as well...
Anyone ever experienced this or know of this issue????
Any advice would be greatly appreciated...
Thanks Tony.

The footage is mainly from the same camera, although occasionally I edit two camera shoots so the other camera is a different model, but this also has a different colour balance after imported.. I have used two identical Sony decks, and my latest acquirsition is a Sony HDV Deck that will natuarally play both. I get the same results from all three decks.
Yes I have rendered footage with no correction or effects and watched it back on a Sony TV/Monitor. Colour is out.
I suppose the tinge looks exactly like an incorrect colour temperature setting, but i know it is correct because when I playback the deck directly into a TV through composite it is fine. Example Warm tone Beige Curtains in a Reception Center look like they have a bad green Cast. Skin tones are no where near natural, again a green cast. I am not sure what is going on..
But yes, it has been there for a couple of years and it just hit me like a tone of bricks after getting this new deck. On previous decks, I never had a monitor connected to the composite and only monitored through the firewire so I always assumed the colour white balance on the cameramans camera is out. WHen I set this deck up, I put a montior on the composite. Yesterday as I was importing source footage, I glanced over and it amazed me to see that the composite monitor on the deck had beautiful rich acurate colour on it, whilst what was coming in on the pc screen, even after playing it back on the TV/Monitor, was horrible.
So I thought, Hell all these years I have been spending hours colour correcting footage that was ok to start with but lost somting in the transfer?? HOW?? I haven't got a clue.. It really doesnt make sence and I am still trying different experiments. I am now going to import through the component and svideo outputs of the deck, to see what results I get... I will post that later.. Thank you all.

Sound input issues. Not related to Soundflower or Balance issues

So. With the sound flower issues fixed. And my balance knobs in place for my stereo speakers. I have opened up a new song I have been writing. Again the AVIGrandpiano app was the track I was recording on. Like my previous post from last week the input on the new music was very faint and not at all matching the input of the previous recorded music. (See Screenshot on earlier posts)
I am at a loss as to where to begin to fix this.

Pampido wrote:
Anyone experiencing similar issues? Or know of a solution?
Not having any issues with my device at all.

Could not retrieve Enterprise Global Template - Load balancer issue

Hi,
We have 4 Project Server 2010 servers. The 4 web servers are load balanced by networking team with sticky session configured.
When we try to connect to the Project Server using MPP 2007 SP2, it fails saying 'Could not retrieve Enterprise Global template'. It works perfect when we point to a specific server by specifying the IP address for server name in the 'hosts'
file.
Earlier we observed some errors in the event viewer related to the SharePoint's internal load balancer for which restarted the 'Project Server Application' on each web server and it got fixed.
Now, the only entries that we see related to load balancer are as mentioned below as Information (not errors).
SharePoint Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event: Initialization
Process Name: w3wp
Process ID: 15080
AppDomain Name: /LM/W3SVC/539065287/ROOT-1-130462463500778047
AppDomain ID: 2
Service Application Uri: urn:schemas-microsoft-com:sharepoint:service:ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b#authority=urn:uuid:9f626d347784423eb14bde4a1f4d13fc&authority=https://lonms12546:32844/Topology/topology.svc
Active Endpoints: 4
Failed Endpoints:0
Endpoint List:
http://lonxxx2532:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
http://lonxxx2545:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
http://lonxxx2546:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
http://lonxxx2566:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
Could the issue be due to network load balancer?
Could the issue be due to Sticky session configuration on the load balancer.?
How can we get to the root cause of the issue?
Which logging category should we set to 'Verbose' that can give us some hint.
Update: We tried to capture the requests through fiddler and observed that when fiddler is running on the client computer then the connection works perfectly fine even through the load balancer. Probably fiddler is reformatting the SOAP
envelop of the web service requests the way it should before sending the request to the server.
If we do not run fiddler and run some other similar tool (like Charles) then it again gives the issue and the request stucks at /PWA/_vti_bin/psi/winproj.asmx
We ran Wireshark on the servers and found the following for that web service call:
[TCP Previous segment not captured] Continuation or non-HTTP traffic.
Please let me know if someone could provide any hint what can be done next.
Regards, Amit Gupta

There are several ways to configure your load balancer. I would suggest that you work with the network engineer, the load balancer vendor and your project administrator to resolve this issue.
Basically you need URL to be resolved correctly. Also, I don't believe PS2007 did a good job handling load balancing, so you may need to bring someone in good with IIS and see they can tweek IIS to manage the cache better.
As I go back and look at your analysis, I think you should probably look at upgrading to Project Server 2013. They made some improvement in load balancing and the management of distributive cache.
I assume you have 4 WFE because you have thousands of project users. Roughly how many you have? Over 1000, over 5000
Have you tried to see if using two load balancing work? How about just one front end. I often see companies scaling SharePoint and Project server to extremes.
Michael Wharton, MVP, MBA, PMP, MCT, MCTS, MCSD, MCSE+I, MCDBA
Website http://www.WhartonComputer.com
Blog http://MyProjectExpert.com contains my field notes and SQL queries

Cisco ACE20 Load balancing issues

Dear All,
I have a problem with the ACE 20 load balance
To start with following is our architectural request flow:
Load Balancer --> Webseal /(reverse proxy) --> HTTP Server --> Portal Server
We have Hardware Load Balancer Cisco ACE20.
When we access our portal from Webseal server it works totally fine without any issue, but when we access the same application using ACE we face the following issues:
1) Some of the links on do not work. For eg: We have a link "subscribe" which points to https://intranet/abc/wps/portal/subscription , whenever we click on this link, the request is directed to https://intranet/abc/wps/portal i.e homepage
2) URL redirection does not work We have some links which have a url forwarding or redirection for example when we open https://intranet/ef/quickplace it forwards the requests to https://intranet/ef/quickplace/Main.nsf?opendocument....., but this redirection fails and again the request is thrown to homepage i.e https://intranet/abc/wps/portal
3) The response of the request and the overall portal when accessed via ACE is very sluggish and it takes 20 seconds for homepage to load, whereas the homepage loads in 4 secs when accessed via webseal.
below is the ACE details. Kindly provide the your inputs to resolve this issue. will rate all the suggestions
Hardware Product Number: ACE20-MOD-K9
Card Index:     207
Hardware Rev:   2.3
Feature Bits:   0000 0002
Slot No. :      7
Type:           ACE
Software
loader:    Version 12.2[120]
system:    Version A2(1.4) [build 3.0(0)A2(1.4) adbuild_11:54:12-2009/03/05_/a
uto/adbu-rel2/rel_a2_1_4_throttle/REL_3_0_0_A2_1_4]
system image file: [LCP] disk0:c6ace-t1k9-mz.A2_1_4.bin
installed license: ACE-SEC-LIC-K9

Dear all,
Please suggest on this issue.
BS

Balance issues

I just discovered that when i plug in my headphones, or connect my iPod to my stereo using the headphone jack, the channels are not balanced, one side is much louder then the other. When I plug in my iPod to my roadtrip, or my altec lansing speakers, using the bottom (USB) port, there is no issue. The sound is fine.
I took the iPod to my neighborhood Apple store genius bar and they had me reformat the iPod and update the software etc. Didn't help.
So...is my 3 year old iPod broken? I find it sort of frustrating that for the money I paid for it, it only had a 3 year life. Is there something else I can do?
thanks,
peter

of course i have. a number of different ones, plus my hook up to my stereo system.
so....any other helpful ideas?

Account Balance Issues

my account balance is $10.17 and i'm trying to buy the new arcarde fire album priced at 9.99 and iTunes is telling me that i have insufficent funds. i would appreciate some help. thank you
Dell Inspiron E1505 Windows XP

You will probably have to report that to ITMS customer service. I dough that anyone on the forum will have any ideas on what to do for that issue.

Balancing issue in POSDM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for