Balnacing Area In MIGO

dear all ;
In MIGO transaction "the Balancing Filed Business Area is missing ". I have maintained OBYC ,Kindly Suggest what to do?

check whether u have given Business area mandatory in the path:
img>FA->GL>BTransactions> document splitting>Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting
If u have maintained business area mandatory Check the settings in OMJ7, whether the business area assigned or not. You have to maintain division in the material master, then system will derive the ba from omj7 settings. If no division is there to assign in the material master in OMJ7 give blank space as the division and assign Business area.

Similar Messages

  • Aacquistion value is negative in area 01(migo)

    Hai Experts,
    While cancelling the material document in migo I am getting an error "acquisition value is negative in are 01".I have checked in OAYZ and "Define how depreciation areas post to general ledger",there it is positive if i change it will work but what is my doubt is why is that negative value appearing because amount ill not be changed.So what will be the solution i can suggest.
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi Pavi,
    Do not change setting at the depreciation area level...
    follow below steps...
    1. Use transaction OAYZ, choose Asset Class and double click on Depreciation Area and check which Layout has been assigned to the active depreciation area.
    2. Use transaction AO21, choose the layout assigned in step 1 and go into Field group rules. Make the field "Negative Value" optional and select fields Class, MnNo. and Sbno. Save settings.
    3. Use transaction AS02 and enter the Asset you are reversing MIGO for, go to depreciation area and double click on one of the active depreciation area and select the field "Negative Value". Repeat this process for all active depreciation areas for the asset.
    Done.
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi

  • Business area in migo and miro

    hi,
    i activated business area financial statement in ob65.and i make gl field status and posting key field status business area is optional.and i assigned business area to plant in OMJ7.
    while doing migo and miro business area is not taking for gl a/c.
    is there any further settings required for this .please give me the solution to resolve this issue.

    Hi
    Encountering the same issue ...any suggestions pls
    Have activated BAFS in OB65 and assigned Plant Division combn to Business area in enterprise structure. But still business area is not getting defaulted in MM and excise utilization transactions
    Thanks and Regards

  • Business area in MIGO

    Hi all,
    I have following problem, in MIGO I can not activate field BSEG-GSBER (Business area) to be update/manually maintaned by user. It is maintained in SPRO and defines combination plant/division/business area, but it is not visible in MIGO until posted. When posted, it is automaticaly updated by customizing table. I want to add this field in all movement types but it is not possible to maintain it for mov.type 101. My developer tried to add it with BADI but to many changes.
    Pls. give some feedback and suggestions.
    Thanks in advance,
    Anchi

    Hi,
    The system takes the business area that appears in the material document
    and in the accounting document from the entries recorded under the
    customizing transaction OMJ7:
    In the piece of coding:
    Main program     SAPLMATL
    Source code of   LMATLF6P
           PERFORM  LESEN_T134H   .
           CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
           MOVE-CORRESPONDING T134H TO MBEFU. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<  HERE
         ENDFORM.
    the system completes MBEFU with the settings recorded in table T134H.
    So I guess it cannot be influenced manually.........
    Maybe you need to write your own code........

  • Want Document date in Translation date when we are doing MIGO.

    Hi Expert,
    While doing MIGO, my client needs "Document date" in "Translation date " when we click "FI Document" button.
    Even i tried badi "FI_TRANS_DATE_DERIVE". but this is working fine for maximum transaction but not working for MIGO.
    Could any body help me on this....
    Regards
    Sanjay Kr.

    Hi Amaresh,
    Without mapping its difficult to achieve, you have to create custom adapter module or you could try below steps.
    1. Configure your receiver file adapter to create files with same source file name
    2. Write script to rename the file based on your requirement.
    3. Call the script in Run OS command after message processing in receiver file adapter.
    Regards,
    Praveen

  • Purchase Order values are not reflecting in MIGO

    Dear Experts,
    I have changed standared Pricing Procedure from TAXINN to TAXINT because excise calculation was wrong. Now I have assinged new pricing procedure & reflecting in Purchase order & working as per requirement also.But when we are doing MIGO, excise values are not automatically coming in MIGO. So Is there any configuration or missing copy control because i have changed pricing procedure?
    Also I want to put a check, if purchase order value is not matching with vendor invoice value then stores person can't do the MIGO.
    Could any body guide me?
    Thanks
    Trupti

    Hi,                                                                               
    It is not like that you have to mandatory use the TAXINN rather it is recommended by SAP to use but if some business requirement doesnu2019t meet up with what is recommended that its business call to go TAXINJ from TAXINN, but right now we don't know at what circumstances they moved to TAXINJ but question is what are the settings missing while moving from TAXINN to TAXINJ and because of that system is not picking the Tax Values at the time of MIGO in excise capture & posting.
    So I have several questions in mind in order to understand your system behaviour.
    1) Are you using the correct Tax code at PO level?
    2) If using the correct Tax code then is't correct value maintained in FTXP for the Tax code used in PO.
    3) If correct Value maintained in Tax code then by clicking on Taxes button mentioned under PO item level details are you able to see the correct value against each applicable condition type in next screen by clicking over Taxes button in PO?
    4) if not then first check J1id - Material Chapter Id combination, vendor excise indicator mentioned, correct duties maintained in excise duty so check all master data related to CIN maintained in J1id
    So first give answer to above mentioned questions then we procees further but I am sure I can make your system to picked  the correct duties don't worry Just answer my questions hope things become fine in your system.
    Best Regards,
    Silky
    Note: Please assign valuable points in order to encourage contributors to each answer to queries...

  • GR/IR A/c Amount and Amount in local Curreny values are not matching

    Hello Gurus
    When we are doing MIGO for some Scheduling Agreement PO's the Amount and Amount in local currency columns are mismatching with  paise (+/-), eventhough PO belongs to Local Currency (INR). Because of this GR/IR account is not cleared after MIRO through F.13. Both MIGO and MIRO amount are showing as Open items.
    Why it is happening and what is the way to clear GR/IR A/C. (F.13 with Tolerance limit is also not workout).
    Thanks & Regards
    Venkat.P

    Hi sridhar
    Thanks for reply
    Through MR11 also these values are not cleared.
    Regards
    Venkat.P

  • Migo based on sales order error -Require CO object

    Dear Experts,
    We have one process,
    Where we are creating sales order and based on sales order, we are doing migo and miro. final entry will be consumption a/c dr to vendor then we are doing billing for the same.
    We got error in migo based on sales order stated that 'please enter co account assignment object.
    where i will cpature this cost on sales order or cost center.
    I think must be part of sales order becoz we are doing consumption based on sales order and revenue and csot must be flow to copa in billing. M i correct?
    If cost object is sales order or PSG in migo? what setting need to be done for the same.
    What will be the ideal process for the same.
    regards
    RR

    hi ajay,
    I have used AAC -X with item category 's' for third party that was suggested by sap
    and the gl i have defined in okb9 with PSG tick.So consumption account linked to my PSG. becoz i m doing migo/miro based on sales order and final entry will be consumption a/c to vendor in my case.
    System will determine PSG in migo and then billing will happened for the same.So my cost and revenue will flow to COPA.
    We have one programme SDVPRSUPDATE that need to execute every monthend.In order to flow cost to COPA for some cases where Billing happened but no GR happened for the same.then this prograame will flow VPRS cost to COPA.
    regards
    RR

  • Excise invoice tab missed in migo screen for import material

    Hai,
    What we had done,
    1 we raise import po.
    2 we posted MIRO for custom invoice purpose,
    Next when we  are doing Migo entry Excise invoice tab  is not display.
    What is solution for this issue ?
    What we have checked.
    1. J1id all combinations, means Chapterid with material, cenvat determination, vendor excise details, Excise indicator for plant,
        Excise tax rates.
    2.At the time of po they ticked invoice base.
    3 We checked movement type 101 for excise duties.
    4.we checked excise group also in this Excise invoice captured is ticked.
    5.. i also checked table for movement type.
    Note: Against this material master no entry is there so this is first time material.
              Relating to this vendor previously we have entries relating to other material masters.
    What is solution for this issue ?
    Why it is not displayed in MIGO Screen ?
    Regards,
    Basha.

    Check the following
    1. Chapter id maintained in material master or j1id.
    2. Cenvat determination maintained
    3. Tax indicator for plant and vendor.
    4. Import conditions rightly classifed under defaults.
    5. Movement type rightly classified
    6.  In case you have created a new plant check for following in the client you are doing the transaction
    IMG>>Logistic-General>>Tax On Goods Movements>>India>>Basic Setting>>Maintain  Plant Settings
    7. Check if you have not done any enhancements, some times this may happen if any enhancement done.
    If all this is checked and in order it should work.
    Regards
    Sangeeta

  • Excise Invoice Tab Page/ Document Info  Tab Page is not appearing in MIGO

    Dear Friend
    For a particular job work PO , with account assignment category F & item category L, non valuaated material, when we are doing migo, excise invoice tab page/ Document Info tab page is not appearing in document header. From The said tab page we can select the challan.
    In J1ID, I have maintained Vendor PAN number and also material chpter id combination.
    Thanks
    Chandra

    Hi
    I maintained material chapter Id combination & vendor Excise Details. We do not maintain any plant -vendor combination. This is a non valuated material with material type unbw. Do I need to maintain cenvat determination tab for this material?
    Thanks
    Chandra

  • Migo for subcontracting po- Excise invoice is posted later to material docu

    Dear all,
    While we are doing migo for sub-contracting PO we are getting an error like this  Excise invoice is posted later to material document.
    process
    1. Create subcontracting PO.
    2. Issue material 541 MVT.
    3. Create sub-contracting challan- dated 8-8-2010.
    4. Migo date 8-8-2010.
    while entering subcontracting challan no & year, error messege  is coming as Excise invoice is posted later to material document.
    Pls give solution.
    Thnaks & regards
    madhu

    Hi,
    You will have to post the MIGO at least one day after the creation of Excise Challan.
    Regards,
    Prashant Kolhatkar

  • Excise base value is not changing in MIGO excise tab for Import  PO scenari

    Dear Gururs,
    We are using MIGO to capture & Post Excise Invoice for our Import PO (PO type ZIMP). the problem is, when we change the qty in MIGO Qty tab, corresponding base value is not getting update in Excise tab. we are not creating the planned cost mIRO directly we do the GRN.
    Please suggest a solution.
    Thanks
    Shital

    Hello Shital  ,
    You are using the India Scenario right?
    The issue can be because you have not assigned a zero tax code to the line item. For India please make the tax code field in PO as mandatory so that the user does not save the PO without atleast a zero tax code.
    Maintain the tax code & proceed. You will see the tab in MIGO.
    Regards
    Plauto

  • Error message to Warning message in MIGO?

    Hi,
    When we are executing MIGO 411 K transaction we are getting error message 'Enter Vendor Number'. I want to supress change error message to warning message.
    Because my requirement is populate vendor dynamically based on combination of Material, Plant, Storage location and Batch. I got user exit for this User-exit (EXIT_SAPMM07M_001) when click on check button.
    We found a User-exit (EXIT_SAPMM07M_001) triggered when User clicks on 'CHECK' button. But since the vendor field (LIFNR) is a mandatory field in MIGO 411 K transaction, its throwing an error message 'Enter Vendor Number'. So unable to proceed further.
    so i want to change error message into warning message and then i will proceed.
    error message i m getting is " Enter vendor number for special stock k".
    Or is there any other to populate the vendor dynamically based on Material, Plant, Storage location and Batch. please help..
    thanks

    This error is dynamic call so you can't make this one as warning message but why don't you try to add the search criteria based on your requirement to the field of vendor in migo.
    e.g. when you do F4 or drop down you will see the list of vendor you can get from diff way.......so add one more earch criteria for your reqs here.

  • Migo reversal

    Dear all,
    We are ding migo reversal of import PO using movement type 102 Q at that time system is throwing error
    Account determination for entry 1000 PRD ____ _ 1000 not possible
    We are reversing it because users have changed the commercial invoice while doing migo against Miro so all CVD is loaded to over inventory
    Excahnge rate at time of Migo and Miro are different
    My question is that why system is asking for PRD account for material having moving average price
    Even if we are maintaining the PRD account then it is showing exchange rate fluctuation in USD not in INR.
    CWIP-NON PO CLR A/C     339.56-     USD
    GR/IR CLRNG ACCOUNT     300.00     USD
    FRX FLTUTN-PO RATE     34.15-     USD
    CUSTOM CLRNG A/C     22.36     USD
    CVD/CENVAT CLRNG A/C     31.60     USD
    CVD/CENVAT CLRNG A/C     0.63     USD
    CVD/CENVAT CLRNG A/C     0.31     USD
    CUSTOM CLRNG A/C     1.09     USD
    CUSTOM CLRNG A/C     0.55     USD
    CUSTOM CLRNG A/C     17.17     USD
    CWIP-NON PO CLR A/C     29,541.72-     INR
    GR/IR CLRNG ACCOUNT     26,100.00     INR
    FRX FLTUTN-PO RATE     0.00     INR
    CUSTOM CLRNG A/C     1,044.00     INR
    CVD/CENVAT CLRNG A/C     1,475.52     INR
    CVD/CENVAT CLRNG A/C     29.58     INR
    CVD/CENVAT CLRNG A/C     14.50     INR
    CUSTOM CLRNG A/C     51.04     INR
    CUSTOM CLRNG A/C     25.52     INR
    CUSTOM CLRNG A/C     801.56     INR
    Kindly suggest.
    Thanks and Regards,

    Hi Priya,
    You need to maintain the configuration settings in OBYC
    Transaction : KDM : Materials management exch.rate diffs
    Enteer the Valuation grouping code( Check the T.code: OMWD) and G/L Account (VARIATION IN EXCH RATE G/L)
    Hope it will clear.
    Regards,
    Kishore K

  • Partner Profit Center in MIGO

    Dear Friends
    I met a problem of partner profit center in MIGO. We have cross company STO transactions.  I checked some STO purchase order and MIGO transactions. For one purchase order, there are two MIGO transactions for one purchase item. However, when I checking accounting document of MIGO, only one accounting document contains partner profit center.  Later on,  only one accounting document of MIRO contains partner profit center. I am confused about the issue.
    Please help and advise.
    Regards,
    Rebe Z.

    Hi Srini,
    In that case, you are not using substitutions in your system. You would be having program RGGBS000 in your system. Also check if you have any entry in table T80D with input as Application area = 'GBLS'.
    Pls ask your functional consultant if you can go ahead substitution or probably you would be using BTE's in your system. Please confirm
    Cheers,
    Vikram

Maybe you are looking for