Bandwidth shaping

Hi,
Need some help on the below.
i have 3 internet links with different BW working in load balancing mode. i want to configure in such a way, the traffic should go to the link which has higher BW, if it reaches 80% then the second link should take the load, if the second link also reaches 80% then the third should take the load. how do i achieve this also what would be the configuration ?
Thanks,
Sridhar

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
PfR might do that.

Similar Messages

  • Bandwidth Shaping for limiting Video and Audio Streaming

    Hi,
    How do I setup this on the SRP527W?
    I already block most of the video stuff on the internet.
    But I want to make this one more step.
    Thanks   
    Best Regards,
    Mr. Simon Yee
    Document Control
    Budi Feed Sdn. Bhd.(827186-P)
    Lot 11940, Jalan Perajurit 1,
    Off Jalan Perajurit,
    Kampung Tengah,
    Telok Gong, 
    42000 Port Klang,
    Selangor Darul Ehsan.
    Tel :-- 603-3134 1081
    Notice of Confidentiality:
    The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same.

    Hello Mr Yee,
    I found a link from the cisco site where you could find the configuration steps for Traffic Shaping.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0/qos/configuration/guide/qcgts.html
    hope you find this answer useful, if it was satisfactory  for you, please mark the question as Answered.
    Thank you

  • RV016 Router Questions

    I am using an RV016 Router on a network with about 30 clients.  The router is configured for IPV4 only, DHCP is turned off, and all clients are authenticated using their MAC address and a static IP address.  However, some MAC addresses are allowed to connect, even though they are not in the table of authorized IP addresses and MAC addresses.  How are they able to connect?
    With this configuration, how can I see who is connected and on what IP address?
    When I check the boxes at the bottom to block IP addresses with incorrect MAC addresses, or block addresses not on the list, the router blocks all clients, even though most of the IP's and MAC's are matched up correctly.  Why?
    When attempting to set up bandwidth shaping for specific IP addresses, I often receive an error message that the minimum speed is greater than the maximum speed allowed, which is not true?  I can't tell when I will or will not receive this error message.  Why?
    I am using the latest firmware on the router.

    Thiago,
    Whenever QOS  is implemented it has certain criteria in which it has to match or it will not apply the QOS  to the frame.
    There is port based, where everything that passes through that port will receive the higher quality of service than the other ports.
    Then there is protocol or ip based QOS, where if the protocol matches that protocol or port number then it receives the QOS.  If it is ip based, it has to match the ip address range you specify to receive the QOS.
    So if you have QOS implemented to match those protocol ports, then only if the traffic matches that criteria verbatim will it be applied.
    In the Switching world, you have to create acl's to match certain criteria to apply qos.  You can say any packet in a certain ip address scheme, matching this protocol port will receive this QOS.
    Hope this helps expain QOS  a little bit for you.

  • Rate Limiting - Will Content Engine 590 solve my problem?

    We have a Cache Engine 550 deployed in our network which is great for reducing traffic on the Link to the Internet, however I have now run into a little problem with the device as we are now trying to implement Bandwidth Shaping using the existing Cisco infrastructure and thus the Cisco IOS.
    One of the IOS features concerned is Committed Access Rate (CAR).
    We would like to do some traffic shaping according to certain IP Protocols such as FTP, HTTP as well as rate limiting certain of our customers (IP Blocks) so that they don’t saturate the Serial link to our ISP.
    The problem we have is that the Cache Engine 550 replaces the original requestors IP with its own as it (the CE) now takes over as the requestor to the Internet – thus we have all HTTP traffic via our ISP having the source as that of the Cache Engine.
    Due to this we cannot “Rate-Limit” a particular customer (IP range).
    Question-------
    Does the Content Engine 590 (ACNS, ICDN) enable me to complete my task and control the Serial connection the way I would like to?
    Can I do a sort of “IP Spoofing” so that the original IP is still in place, but the Content Engine still does its job of Caching?
    I have already looked at the Packeteer – unfortunately it only has Ethernet ports.
    The WiseWan 401 with HSSI port looked promising, but I feel that even though it will do great shaping and graphs it will still not solve the problem of a saturated link upstream to the ISP (from the boxes point of view), I will still sit with packets being dropped and thus bandwidth wasted.
    Anyone out there with any other solution?
    Thanks in advance.
    Lutz.

    Hi,
    We have just implemented IP spoofing in version 4.2 of ACNS code. (Caching) which will only run on a 590/560/507/7320 cache.
    Version 4.2 sould be available at the end of July early August. This will slove you problem with identifing traffic to rate limit.
    Cheers
    Phil

  • HTTP Streaming supporting in sprint09

    We are told that s09 supports Adobe's HTTP streaming already. Does anybody know how Adobe's HTTP streaming work? I try to find how player of s09 work for http streaming, but I have no progress until now. If somebody has similar need, let's have a discussion here.

    Hi Dai,
    our demo is developed by ourself, i dont know how adobe is doing it. You can simply grap the latest fp 10.1 documentation and take a look at the netstream object.
    The new mode is free from filecontainer specifications, that means you can build simply your own or transmux other filecontainer formats or build your own encryption / drm protection. As long as you follow the h.264 or vp6 or h.263 codec specifications fp 10.1 can decode and stream it. but, you need toDo all bandwidth shaping inside FP10.1 - and beware some algoryhtmen are patent protected by akamai and level(3) - only for info.
    I was able to transmux the silverlight format to fp 10.1 byte format. When you want to develope it by yourself make your brain free from file container formats like SWF. You can work with raw encoded frames in fp 10.1.
    My idea is also to transmux the video streams and audio stream separetly, that means you can have 4 video and 1 audio stream. Right now i only saw adobe dynamic streaming with xx video and same xx audio. In some situations this not the best solution (traffic + webspace coast + encoding time).
    Do you have start developing? Send us a link to take a look on it.
    Best
    Gary
    http://onlinelib.de
    Am 24.03.2010 um 07:38 schrieb xingzhedai:
    Gary,
    Thanks a lot.
    Do you mean flash player 10.1 can play the ismv file segment with H.264 codec?
    I tried the demo on the link you sent to me before, it works very well. My question is that is this demo shows exactly the offical HTTP streaming of Adobe? Do you know when adobe will publish his http streaming scheme officially? I tested the demo and catched the message between flash player and the backend server of Inetbone, and I didn't see the description file, like manifest file in IIS smooth streaming. So my another question is that how the player knows the oganization of the whole media file? I guess these segment description information is compiled in swf file? Am I right?
    BestRegards
    Jinliang Dai
    代金良
    华为技术有限公司  huawei_logo
    地址：北京市海淀区东北旺西路8号中关村软件园17号楼 邮编：100193
    BuildingNO.17, Zpark, Hai-Dian District, Beijing P.R. China, ZIP:100193
    电话：82829334
    手机：13581586128
    电子邮件：mailto:[email protected]
    http://www.huawei.com
    >

  • Firewall for traffic shaping and bandwidth

    Hi all,
    I want one basic firewall for my small office. I have 15 to 20 users in my office. Please suggest me which firewall suitable for me? Please help me. Thanks

    Hi Sandeep,
    I guess this is mainly for day to day general work activities like browsing etc. You can go with ASA5505 with 50User license. In future if number of users grow, you can upgrade the license as well with no additional hardware costs.
    hth,
    MS

  • Can Anyone Help Me Configure My Verizon (D-Link) DSL-2750B "Traffic Shaping" (QoS)?

    Well ... I just spent a wonderful hour and a half (not) bouncing around VZ technical support, etc. trying to get assistance regarding configuring my DSL router.* Between the low-quality Skype connection to India and my lack of success, I'm a little bummed out right now.
    Could one of you perhaps help me? I'm trying to configure a single, wire-attached network node (port 4 of the router) so that it can only consume up to 320 Kbps of my 750 Kbps (7.5 Mbps) DSL bandwidth ... no matter what. This results from this node consuming virtually all of the circuit's bandwidth when streaming or during bulk file transfers.
    I have tried to remedy the problem using priority with no discernible impact.
    The Quality of Service (QoS) element called Traffic Shaping (Services | QoS | Traffic Shaping), described on Page 51 of the VZ DSL-2750B User Manual , appears to be the ideal solution to my problem. Repeated attempts at activating this QoS have all resulted in no throttling of bandwidth consumption.
    My most recent attempt was to define the device on Port 4 as the DMZ host ... and then apply a new rule (320 TX, 320 RX) to this interface. Again, no joy.
    Does anyone have any experience with this service on this router?
    Am I chasing my tail trying to configure the router without validating that my circuit is not configured with "Fastpath (PSE) inactive"?
    If the circuit configuration is a potential problem, which office should I ask for at VZ customer service?
    Here is the information from the System page of the Router Control Panel:
      Gateway ID: PX2M1BC000000
      Software Version: 5.4.12.1.44
      Release Date: Feb 19 2012
      Platform: D-Link DSL-2750B
      Board Tag:... Ntag-5_4_12_1_44
      Compilation Flags:... LIC=/home/bat/bat/dlink_bcm96328_5_4_12_1/20120219_1343/conf/jpkg_bcm9636x_dlink.lic CONFIG_RG_PROD_IMG=y DIST=DLINK_DSL2750B
    I'll note that the Router provides a notification that "RX QOS might not operate when Fastpath (PSE) is active" when I update the router configuration page concerning Traffic Shaping. Because Fastpath is not mentioned in the User Manual, I'm guessing that Fastpath (PSE) might be a configurable attribute of the circuit servicing my PoP, but I have no idea if this is the case.
    I searched for relevant messages on this board ... without success. If this has already been addressed, please provide a link, and accept my apologies. (My Google-Fu tends to be weak.)

    The asterisk in the first post refers to the following summary of events:
    10:40 - Attempt to solve my configuration question using VZ chat begins.
    10:49 - VZ chat agent Danish refers me to phone support.  (Chat ID number is 020813176471 if you're with VZ and are interested.)
    10:50 - Call VZ phone support.
    11:02 - Talk with Angel.  Because she has not heard of, nor received training in, "traffic shaping," she says my question about configuring this VZ DSL modem must be addressed by "Premium Technical Support."  She transfers me.
    11:13 - Talk with Pamela.  Premium Technical Support only responds to questions about 3d party products.  Because my question concerns a VZ DSL modem, Basic Technical Support is responsible.  She transfers me.
    11:17 - Talk with Joe.  He says either the vendor (D-Link) or premium technical support is required.  Because I had already tried with D-Link (they referred me to Verizon, as this modem was built exclusively for VZ), I explained what I had already experienced, and described how I wanted "assistance configuring my VZ DSL modem, specifically a feature described on page 51 of the User Manual."  He transfers me.
    11:23 - The automated phone system asks for my 12-digit customer ID.  I wasn't able to find it fast enough, and rolled through to Financial Services.  Eventually Trig picked up, listened to my story, and transferred me to "Technical Support" providing the direct dial number, just in case (866.945.79xx).
    11:32 - Entered the phone queue.  Lots of hissing and clicks.
    11:35 - Talk with Monika.  (The voice clarity from this point onward was on the order of 1st-generation Skype.  Between the horrible language problem -- Monika is in India don'cha know -- and the lousy line quality, this was the most frustrating.)  No matter what I said, I couldn't convey the reason for my call.  I asked to talk with a supervisor, which Monika related was not possible.  She also related that she could not transfer me to an American POC or supervisor.
    12:01 - Hung up the phone ... and started down the path that led to my post immediately above.
    I was repeatedly queried about the account name and number throughout the process.  Conveying this information was especially challenging during the Indian call segment.

  • How do you tell if a 3750 interface is shaping or policing traffic?

    We have an Avaya PBX Medpro board plugged into a 3750 port with the following configuration:
    interface FastEthernet1/0/4
    description PBX Medpro-1
    switchport access vlan 10
    switchport mode access
    duplex full
    speed 100
    srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
    srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 0 0 0
    mls qos trust dscp
    auto qos voip trust
    Everything was working fine until the PBX call level went above 110 calls (G-711) which pushed the interface to more than 10mbps. When this happened random calls out of that medpro became garbled and after lots of troubleshooting we came to the conclusion that the default auto qos settings where the problem.
    Default auto qos puts these statements on an interface:
    srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
    srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 0 0 0
    ...which means that queue 1 will allow for 10mbps of traffic and then shaping will kick in.
    Adding the line 'priority-queue out' to the interface disables the 10mbps limitation of queue 1 and instead forces the interface to process every packet that goes into the priority queue before anything else.
    My question is - is there a 'show' command that we can use to see shaping at work? On router ports with a service policy that has shaping or policing on it you can see the shaping/policing in real time with 'show policy....'
    What about on the 3750 switch ports?

    Thanks for responding. We work with DSCP so I tried your example on the port a medpro is connected to, but with DSCP, as in:
    int f0/15
    description Medpro-1
    switchport access vlan 12
    mls qos dscp 46
    srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
    srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 0 0 0
    auto qos voip trust
    This is the output of 'sh mls qos int f0/15'
    #sh mls qos int f0/15
    FastEthernet0/15
    trust state: not trusted
    trust mode: not trusted
    trust enabled flag: ena
    COS override: dis
    default COS: 0
    DSCP Mutation Map: Default DSCP Mutation Map
    Trust device: none
    qos mode: port-based
    Note - it doesn't show that 'mls qos dscp 46' did anything. Also it won't take the command 'mls qos dscp override', so how do I tell to mark incoming packets to DSCP 46?

  • Traffic Shaping for perticular traffic

    class-map match-any SYSLOG-CMAP
    match access-group name SYSLOG-ACL
    policy-map SYSLOG-PMAP
    class SYSLOG-CMAP
      shape average 250000
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
    ip flow ingress
    load-interval 30
    duplex full
    speed 100
    service-policy output SYSLOG-PMAP
    Router1#show policy-map int GigabitEthernet0/1
    GigabitEthernet0/1
      Service-policy output: SYSLOG-PMAP
        Class-map: SYSLOG-CMAP (match-any)
          712495474 packets, 394564809213 bytes
          30 second offered rate 41000 bps, drop rate 23000 bps
          Match: access-group name SYS-LOG-ACL
            712495474 packets, 394564809696 bytes
            30 second rate 41000 bps
          Queueing
          queue limit 64 packets
          (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/152567902/0
          (pkts output/bytes output) 559927554/295263742429
          shape (average) cir 250000, bc 1000, be 1000
          target shape rate 250000
        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          3774914087 packets, 1413482437872 bytes
          30 second offered rate 2796000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
          queue limit 64 packets
          (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/19837/0
          (pkts output/bytes output) 3817743535/1477901813111
    =====================================================
    Hi everyone,
    In the above configuration, I configured traffic shaping to shape the syslog traffic to certain limit. My question is, Can I apply traffic shaping to perticular traffic ? What will happen to the remaining traffic ? We have ethernet hand-of to provider but total bandwidth we can use is 8M, which is controlled by ISP. We just send all the traffic without any shaping.
    Thanks

    Traffic shaping only works from the source. there is no way (other than policing - i.e., discard) to shape through the cloud.
    If you tried to pace the traffic through the cloud, it's got to be buffered somewhere, causing latency, and ultimately discarded frames after the buffers fill.
    Policing allows the traffic through until some threshold occurs (traditional frame = DE set at Bc, discard at Be), then the traffic is dropped.
    FWIW
    Scott

  • Bandwidth percent - ios xr

    hi everyone,
    in a policy map - when you configure your classes - ex
    class 1
    bandwidth percent 25
    class 2
    bandwidth percent 25
    class 3
    bandwidth percent 25
    class 4
    bandwidth percent 25
    - will this negate p2mdrr or mddr? ie. have I configured the policy to "not" have any remaining available bandwidth to any other classes?
    thanks,
    Andrew

    hi andrew,
    bw percent gives you a defined assigned CIR based on the parent shaping bandwidth.
    bandwidth remaining (percent) will get a modified deficted  rate of the left over bandwidth after all the classes have been served that have an assigned CIR.
    you can see how the programming of the shaped classes has been done with the command show qos int <interface> <direction> which gives you the CIR that is currently running on that class and their (excess) weight ratio as determined by the scheduler, available bw and all that.
    cheers
    xander

  • Reserve Bandwidth / QoS

    Hello,
    I have a site that has a T1 - I need to reserve the bandwidt for all internet traffic to 90% of that T1, while allowing the voice traffic which is on a specific port to use all 100% of the bandwidth. Please advise on to the best way to achieve this.
    Any assistance with achieving this would be greatly appreciated.

    Hello Michael,
    This will need to be done with QoS priority with Policing or shaping.
    Please follow the next document:
    http://brian-kayser.blogspot.com/2010/10/doing-asa-quality-of-service-qos.html
    That should do it for you.
    Julio

  • QoS Shaping Subinterface

    This may not even be possible but figured I'd ping a few other brains. We are in the process of setting multiple sub-interfaces out to branch offices off our own transport. Part of this is providing them committed sub-rate interface speeds. Easy enough with an MQC shaping policy. However here's the gotcha we'd like if other sub-interfaces on the PHY aren't in use to allow the site to burst. I'm wondering if this kind of dynamic sharper is possible.
    policy-map Ring-Traffic
    class Voice
    priority percent 30
    class Signal
    priority percent 5
    class class-default
    random-detect
    policy-map Shape-DATX
    class class-default
    bandwidth 60000
    shape average 60000000
    service-policy Ring-Traffic
    policy-map Shape-CRCO
    class class-default
    bandwidth 20000
    shape average 20000000
    service-policy Ring-Traffic
    interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1
    no ip address
    speed auto
    duplex auto
    negotiation auto
    interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1.39
    description CRCO
    encapsulation dot1Q 39
    ip address 10.39.39.1 255.255.255.252
    service-policy output Shape-CRCO
    interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1.40
    description DATX
    encapsulation dot1Q 40
    ip address 10.40.40.1 255.255.255.252
    service-policy output Shape-DATX
    So in the above example if Gi3/0/1.40 had zero traffic Gi3/0/1.39 should be able to take all of it's 60Mbps. Basically dynamic load sharing. Not sure if this is even possible with QoS MQC. Curious as to others thoughts.
    Thanks.

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    Not that I'm aware of.

  • Traffic Shaping ASR9k in output interface.

    If we configure output traffic shaping  on an ASR 9000 interface the Service Policy is not installed, however in cco we can find that traffic shaping is supported see the next link:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4.2/qos/configuration/guide/b_qos_cg421asr_chapter_0100.html#ID407
    My configuration is:
    policy-map I4-TEST-OUT
    class class-default
      shape average 300000 bps
    interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1/10
    description <DESCRIPTION . CIRCUIT_ID>
    bandwidth 300
    service-policy input I4-TEST-IN
    service-policy output I4-TEST-OUT
    ipv4 address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
    ipv4 verify unicast source reachable-via rx
    load-interval 30
    ASR9k#show policy-map int g0/0/1/10
    GigabitEthernet0/0/1/10 input: I4-TEST-IN
    Class class-default
      Classification statistics          (packets/bytes)     (rate - kbps)
        Matched             :                   0/0                    0
        Transmitted         : N/A
        Total Dropped       :                   0/0                    0
      Policing statistics                (packets/bytes)     (rate - kbps)
        Policed(conform)    :                   0/0                    0
        Policed(exceed)     :                   0/0                    0
        Policed(violate)    :                   0/0                    0
        Policed and dropped :                   0/0
    GigabitEthernet0/0/1/10 direction output: Service Policy not installed
    RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:CE.HTCHP.RPE01#
    as you can see we got a message "GigabitEthernet0/0/1/10 direction output: Service Policy not installed".
    If I use a class instead of the class class-default the policy-map is correctly installed,  If I use a child policy-map under the class class-default the policy is installed also.
    Do you know if it is a restriction to use traffic shaping in an output interface and using the default class?
    regards
    thanks

    I forgot to post the 15.x otuput; here it is.
    R2#sh policy-map int f0/0
     FastEthernet0/0
      Service-policy output: SHAPE_10M
        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          14 packets, 1056 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps
          Match: any
          Queueing
          queue limit 64 packets
          (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
          (pkts output/bytes output) 14/1056
          shape (average) cir 10000000, bc 40000, be 40000
          target shape rate 10000000

  • Per VLAN traffic shaping on ME3400

    Customer side Metro 3400 switch:
    Port is 100Mb, Vlan 80 is 80MbCIR, Vlan81 is 10MbCIR
    want to shape each vlan down to CIR
    what is best configuration to do this? Here is what I tried...
    class-map match-all vlan81
    match vlan 81
    class-map match-all vlan80
    match vlan 80
    policy-map ATTCIR
    class vlan80
    bandwidth 80000
    class vlan81
    bandwidth 10000
    policy-map out-policy
    class class-default
    shape average 90000000
    service-policy ATTCIR
    IMC-OPTEMAN(config)#int gig0/1
    IMC-OPTEMAN(config-if)#service-policy out
    IMC-OPTEMAN(config-if)#service-policy output out-policy
    QoS: Configuration failed. Match VLAN filter is not allowed in classmap of outpu
    t policymap
    IMC-OPTEMAN(config-if)#
    I also try using access-lists and get the following:
    access-list 180 permit ip any 192.168.128.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 181 permit ip any 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
    class-map match-all vlan81
    match access-group 181
    class-map match-all vlan80
    match access-group 180
    policy-map ATTCIR
    class vlan80
    bandwidth 80000
    class vlan81
    bandwidth 10000
    policy-map out-policy
    class class-default
    shape average 90000000
    service-policy ATTCIR
    IMC-OPTEMAN(config-if)#service-policy output out-policy
    Configuration Failed. Can not have ACL based classification in a class-map withi
    n an output policy-map

    thank you!
    Your advice worked perfectly for marking the input traffic. Now I am unable to shape the output traffic the way I want. Since this is 100Mb FastEthernet interface the error message is that I can only shape to 50000000
    here is config I want, and the 10000000 shaping works but ME3400 will not accept
    80000000 class-based shaping on a FastEthernet interface
    class-map match-all vlan81class
    match vlan 81
    class-map match-all vlan81out
    match qos-group 81
    class-map match-all vlan80class
    match vlan 80
    class-map match-all vlan80out
    match qos-group 80
    policy-map vlan80group
    class class-default
    set qos-group 80
    policy-map vlan81group
    class class-default
    set qos-group 81
    policy-map inputgroup
    class vlan80class
    service-policy vlan80group
    class vlan81class
    service-policy vlan81group
    policy-map ATTOPT
    class vlan81out
    shape average 10000000
    class vlan80out
    shape average 80000000

  • Cisco 7609-S/ME3600X port shaping

    Hello everyone
    I am using the folloing configuration on Cisco ME36000X for port shaping
    policy-map TEST_OUT_10MB
    class class-default  
    shape average 10000000
    policy-map TEST_IN_10MB
    class class-default
    police 10000000
    interface GigabitEthernet0/2
    switchport trunk allowed vlan none
    switchport mode trunk
    load-interval 30
    service instance 101 ethernet  
    encapsulation untagged  
    service-policy input TEST_IN_10MB  
    service-policy output TEST_OUT_10MB  
    bridge-domain 101
    interface Vlan101
    bandwidth 10000
    ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.252
    I have applyed also the same port shaping on an Cisco 7609-S with an 7600-ES+20G3CXL
    policy-map TEST_10MB  
    class class-default    
      police 10000000    
       shape average 10000000
    interface GigabitEthernet1/11
    bandwidth 10000
    ip address  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.252
    load-interval 30
    service-policy input TEST_10MB
    service-policy output TEST_10MB
    When i am downloading a file and capturing the traffic with wireshark there is significant difference on Cisco 7609-S graph with that one on Cisco ME3600X. Both have the same internet connection.
    Is there any way to fine tune Cisco ME3600X to have the same behavior like Cisco 7609-S?
    Regards
    Antonis.

    I have not that graph so I am just guessing that you are noticing the difference between policing and shaping. It seems to me you are applying these techniques on each platform on a different way. Try to shape/police in the same order or only to shape.
    Hope to help
    Alessio
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Maybe you are looking for