BAPI_PO_CHANGE "No account assignment for service 0000010" SE 518 Error

Hi Friends,
I am using BAPI_PO_CHANGE to add new line item with service data to purchase order.
For one scenario BAPI give me above error is "No account assignment for service 0000010" SE 518 .
basically when i pass outline aggrement and contract item to bapi i am getting this error.....according to my observation in outline agrement account assignment is maintain as 'U' but i want to pass outline agrement as 'K' or 'N' so i am passing this into BAPI parameters ,however i feel somewhere it is getting conflict so it giving above error...
Please guide,
Thanks & Regards,
Bhaskar

Hi Seini,
Thanks for reply ..
I have pass contract number to BAPI ....and i also pass cost center and GL account to account assignment but still bapi giving same error.....I am totally stuck into this i tried a lot with different options..for other scenario BAPI works fine but when I pass contract number with account assignment 'U' and I want to change this 'U' to 'K' or 'N' for this I pass account assignment to PO line item but BAPI fails in this perticular scenario.

Similar Messages

Account assignment for service item not copied from PR in PO

Hi,
We have a PR created for a service item from SRM. When we run ME59 it automatically creates the PO without issues by copying the account assignment details from the PR. The problem is as follows:
1. If we try to manually create a PO using ME21N from this PR, the account assignment is not getting copied from the PR but it throws the account assignment pop up screen where we manually have to enter the account assignment.
2. The client is using a Z transaction of ME59 which is copy of Me59 but with a few validations (nothing to do with Account assignment). This Z Tcode also fails to create the PO with the error 'no account assignment'. Indicating that the PR account assignment details are not getting copied.
Note: This is happening for all PR's irrespective of whether its created in SRM or created using ME51N.
Please let me know if someone has faced a similar issue
Thanks,
Lakshmi

Hi,
Please check first if notes 1085214 and 1102653
could solve the issue.
Regards,
Edit

Incorrect account assignment for service PR after IW32 save

One service PR was created thourgh Tcode IW32 by BDC program (recorded through SHDB). Account assignment data of Service PR is absolutly correct and remains the same for the further PR & PO processing.
In case of any changes in the service PR through IW32 (again BDC program), GL account of Service PR is not getting derived and Gl account becomes null subsequently commitment item is not getting derived.
IW32 save is getting failed by error message 'No commitment item is derived/entered for item.......'.
By searching SAP OSS Notes, found 2 nos. similar notes 802965 & 956751 but both are alreay corrected through support package ECC6.0 - 006. our support package is 013.
This nature of problem is facing through IW32 transaction (without BDC program). Unable to find any errors in IW32 change BDC.
Unable to understand the problem. Please help.

Hello,
during this Run of BDC what Information your changing at PR afte calling it Via Iw32.
Regards,
Rakesh

BAPI_PO_CHANGE problems with Account Assignment in Services

Hi,
I´m facing a problem using BAPI_PO_CHANGE, this is the scenario, every time a PO is changed in ME22N for Company Code X, I need to change a "mirror" PO in Company Code Y which has the same information, this PO contains Services, to achieve this I implemented the Badi ME_PURCHDOC_POSTED and used the BAPI_PO_CHANGE.
It works fine when I change the Service price or Delete an Item, the problem is when I need to remove the delete mark of the deleted item, in both Company the deletion mark is removed but the Account Assignment for the service on Company Code Y is lost even when I'm sending the accounts in the moment I call the BAPI_PO_CHANGE.
Do you have any idea/solution for this?.
Thanks and Regards,
Fabian Fonseca

hi,
see this thread
Re: Using BAPI_PO_CHANGE to change header text of PO
thanks

Automatic GL account pick for service PO

When I raise PO with account assignment u2018 Ku2019 it ask cost center and pick the GL account automatically from OBYC table. But when I raise PO for service with item category u2018 D u2019 and account assignment u2018 k u2018 it picks different GL account. I think that GL account pick which is assigned for service material group. Any one can tell me how and where from that GL account pick. Anywhere else GL account is assigned for service material group?

Hi,
In the SPRO you have groups defined and for these service group you assign the valuation class.
Path - SPRO - MM - Purchasing - Material Master - Entry Aids for Items Without a Material Master
Then in OBYC against these valuation class you assign the GL accounts.
Thanks & Regards,
Kiran

Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset

Dear experts,
I have creted one main asset . and i have created group asset. and my main asset class and group asset class are both are different.If i continue that error assets are shoud be craeted .but the depreciation key and usefull life and ordinary depreciation will going and it's showing grey.
My question at the time of assighning the group asset for the particular assets the below error is comming.
Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset
Message no. AA810
Diagnosis
The account allocation 14000 of the group asset 140000001 0 is different from account allocation 1000 of the asset.
System Response
This error needs to be corrected for balance sheet valuation (usually determined in depreciation area 01). For all other depreciation areas, this is only a warning you should check.
Procedure
Check your entry. When an individual asset has a different account assignment than the group asset, it is not possible to reconcile the individual asset to the group asset in reporting by means of accounts.
kindly help on this issue
regards
venkataswamy

Hi sudhakar
Thanks for your reply
1) for example i have buliding asset class and i have one group asset class.under the building asset account determination i have assighned the gl a/c for both b/s and book deprecitaion
In groups asset class also i have done same things. i have craeted asset under building asset class and created one asset under group assets.
then assighned the group asset to main assets. the error is comming like this Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset
I have serched in sdn forum and service .sap.com . they are saying you can use same gl a/c for both asset class.for depreciation .i have tried this scenario. still i am getting the same error and same problem.
The most important thing is we are working on ECC 6 versions
sap note 76186.
Kindly help me
Regards
venkataswamy
Edited by: venkataswamy bathini on Jul 6, 2009 9:22 AM

Account assignment for clearing lines

Hello,
My client business need the derivation tool to overwrite the commitment item for the clearing account lines (operation WRX) instead of being inherited from the predecessor PO.
Therefore, as specified in sap note 923672, I activated the predelivered parameter FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE in table FM01X. Unfortunately the results were not as I expected. Although it shows in the derivation trace that the commitment item is overwritten for the clearing account, this does not match with the FI doc.
Have anyone ever used this feature? Do anyone know why this is happening?
Best regards,
Bernardo

Hello Bernardo,
Same problem has been reported in the OSS, (probably by you?).
Depending on the release and support package customers are working on, these notes should solve the problem, some of them are also for overwriting PO account assignment in Service Entry Sheets:
977363 New manual FM account assignment incorrectly overwritten --> (specially this one)
1041730 FM Account Assignments objects are not correctly determined
1077529 RFFMCHAT incorrectly calls FMDERIVE instead of reassignment
1146677 Service Entry Sheet FM account assignment inherited from PO
Kind regards,
Mar Novalbos

Account assignment for Movt type 101 and 501

All SAP Gurus,
We want to do the account assignment for movt types 101, 102, 122, 123, 201, 202, 261, 262 accourding to the movement types.
We are aware that the Transaction Key is 'GBB'.
But how to know that which 'General Modification' is used for which movement types.
(in short where we can find this link between movement types and Transaction Key and 'General Modification')
Regards,

To know this first you have to know what does the different general modifications means for GBB:
AUA: for order settlement
AUF: for goods receipts for orders (without account assignment)
and for order settlement if AUA is not maintained
AUI: Subsequent adjustment of actual price from cost center directly
to material (with account assignment)
BSA: for initial entry of stock balances
INV: for expenditure/income from inventory differences
VAX: for goods issues for sales orders without
account assignment object (the account is not a cost element)
VAY: for goods issues for sales orders with
account assignment object (account is a cost element)
VBO: for consumption from stock of material provided to vendor
VBR: for internal goods issues (for example, for cost center)
VKA: for sales order account assignment
(for example, for individual purchase order)
VKP: for project account assignment (for example, for individual PO)
VNG: for scrapping/destruction
VQP: for sample withdrawals without account assignment
VQY: for sample withdrawals with account assignment
ZOB: for goods receipts without purchase orders (mvt type 501)
ZOF: for goods receipts without production orders
(mvt types 521 and 531)
You can also define your own account groupings. If you intend to post goods issues for cost centers (mvt type 201) and goods issues for orders (mvt type 261) to separate consumption accounts, you can assign the account grouping ZZZ to movement type 201 and account grouping YYY to movement type 261
Then go and check OMWN.
Regards,
Indranil

Multiple account assignment for asset

Hi,
I had created PO with multiple account assignment for asset. PO is created with one line item having 5 qty and in multiple account assignment 5 assets are entered with qty distribution.
I have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post migo(GR) the value is posting for only first one asset not for all.
So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
Reagrds,
Umesh
Edited by: Umesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 6:43 AM

Hi,
1st check in OME9 t.code for account assignment A, the selection of 2(Multiple account ***)in field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn and Distribution field as 1.
Then during PO creation for single line item & in Item details TAB, in account assignment segment, you enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep qty. with asset number(A1) with G/L account ( different G/L Account) OR enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep qty. with another asset number(A2) with G/L account (different G/L Account)
####Example-1: in account assignment segment , if you have
G/L account----
Asset
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
12346u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
12347u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
12348u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
Vendor A/C: Cr
G/L account (12345): Dr
G/L account (12346): Dr
G/L account (12347): Dr
G/L account (12348 ):Dr
#####Example-2: in account assignment segment , if you have
G/L account----
Asset
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
Vendor A/C: Cr
G/L account (12345): Dr
Regards,
Biju K

Account det for service

Dear Friends
Can anyone pls explain me about account determination for service, how does the posting happen for service PO how are GL accounts determined automatically and the procedure
we are implementing in the same server which is having 3 more company codes
your kindness is greatly appreciated
thanks and regards
John

I got it
thanks

Default account assignment for Rate difference for sales a/c

When we try to clear the vendor through F110 we are facing error. Document posted with SDRU currency. It is expiry currency. It need to clear through USD . Vendor contain customer in the master data. But we are unable post in System No 1
Another system we are able to post. It is automatically taking GL accounts for rate difference accounts for sales and purchase accounts.
Here the entry is like below
001 18      vendor                           139,99
002 25      Customer                   488,98
003 50      Bank                340,98
004 40      Rate difference for sales a/c          4,69
005 50      Rate difference for purchases         12,70
We want to compare both systems to find out the reason why it is not posing in one system
Rate difference for purchases account assigned to OBYC-KDM
But we are unable to find the Gl account Rate difference for sales a/c where it is assigned.
We have seen OBKP, VKOA, OBA1 . Please let us know where this Rate difference for sales a/c may be assigned
Please let us know Default account assignment for Rate difference for sales a/c

Hi,
    Regarding the rate differences. These accounts come from OB09 where it is defined for the Reconcilliation account in the customer/ Vendor.
The account "Rate difference for purchases" is coming from OB09 , it is not from OBYC-KDB in this case.
Kind regards

Location and account assignment for technical objeCT

WHAT IS Location and account assignment for technical objeCT , FOR functional location

Hi
check the one of the Views for the above data (notification no + fun Location)
VIQMAML_IFLOS
VIQMELST_IFLOS
VIQMEL_IFLOS
VIQMFEL_IFLOS
VIQMSML_IFLOS
Regards
Anji

Multiple account assignement for PO

Hi!
i've this problem about purchase data: to extract these data i'm using 2lis_02_itm and 2lis_02_Scl DS.
but i need in the same query the account assignement for PO (these data are in EKKN table).
in a first time i've enhanced the DS, but with Multiple account assignement i don't have correct data (because i've used select single in CMOD).
now i don't know how to enhance the DS with Multiple account assignement, could you help me ?
(a solution is doing an ODS with EKKN data and make an infoset with an other ODS with data from LIS extractor, but i prefer to enhance the DS)

Hi Alex
You are not able to enhance 2lis_02* datasources to give you the information wanted. The problem is that you need to split one line into multiple lines. I'm as well not sure that you'll get a good result from an infoset as youll get performance problems due to the needed join on document , line level and a possible outer join (not all documents will show up in EKKN). A better solution will be to source EKKN to a separate ODS, source 2lis_02* into separate ODSs and then create a new ODS sourcing data from the 2lis_02* ODS where you read the EKKN ODS in the start routine and uses that info to create extra rows if needed.
With Kind Regards
Kristian

GL Account assigned for a Material

Dear All,
Please let me know how can we find the GL Account assigned for a Material.
I am having some 10 number of materials. I need to find the GL Account which is assigned for the materials.
Regards,
Karthik
Edited by: Kartyic on Dec 19, 2011 5:27 AM

Hi,
G/L Account assigned to a material is nothing but the G/L provided to the valuation class which is assigned to the material in Accounting- view of the material master -MM01.And this assignment of G/L to the valuation class is made in tcode OBYC.
All the same kind of material types contain same valuation class.
Thanks
Edited by: Madhavi.n on Dec 19, 2011 10:00 AM

Error in account assignment for item

Hello,
We have configured EBP at Stack 03 in SRM release 550
We are facing problem to create shopping cart,
Already it was working fine but now at the time of adding item to shopping cart it shows below error
messages
1.Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2007
2.Error in account assignment for item
For your reference error screen is given in attached document.
pls advise
Regards,
Santosh

Hi Christophe,
I am getting the same error <b>'Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2007'</b> when tried to create a Sales Order in IDES system and I am trying the solution to add the fiscal year 2007 in T.code OKEV but it fails.
The steps what I have done :
1. Go to OKEV
2. Selecting control area 1000
3. Selecting the version 0 line
4. then trying to open the Settings for Each fiscal year from Dialog Structure
The error i get is :
<b>E: Activation of the indicator is not permitted</b>
and the highlighted line in red is for Version 1
The default indicator is set for version 1 is Plan, WIP/RA, Variance & Legal Valuation (Valuation view)
I tried in many ways to 'uncheck' the boxes for this version 1 but fails.
Pls help.
regds,
Umesh

BAPI_PO_CHANGE "No account assignment for service 0000010" SE 518 Error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for