Base Amount - Bilateral Facility

Hello Experts!
We are including a Money Market contract that is corrected by a variable rate and after then your balance updated by a fixed interest rate. To solve this agreement we are using two Products. The first is an Interest rate instrument with capitalized interests. The second transaction is a bilateral facility Product where are using the fixed interest rate to actualize the base amount from first transaction.
The problem is occurring only on the bilateral facility Product. As the main contract has its capitalized interest the correct should be the Bilateral Facility to collect the base amount already updated with the interests. What is happening is that the Bilateral Facility is ignoring the interests on the day of extraction, using only the base amount. If we calculated for the next month, the base amount will consider the interests of the previus month. Thus the value of the base amount is always with a delay of one month.
Could you please let me know why the Bilateral Facility does not consider the interest on the day of extraction?
Best Regards

Hello Marcelo.
We have two transactions:
1) 20000022 - Interest rate instrument
2) 20000023 - Bilateral Facility
If you take a look the cash flow from 20000022 transaction will see the follow base amount and interests as indicated in the variable rate:
03/03/2010 – Base amount 4.632,00 and Interest 0,00
03/04/2010 – Base amount 4.632,00 and Interest 2,65
03/05/2010 – Base amount 4.634,65 and Interest 0,00
03/06/2010 – Base amount 4.634,65 and Interest 4,24
03/07/2010 – Base amount 4.638,89 and Interest 3,15
Now let`s verify the 20000023 transaction… do you agree that the base amount to calculate the fixed rate it shoud be the BASE AMOUNT + INTEREST?
For example, the base amount used in 03/04/2010 it should be 4.632,00 + 2,65.
In the cash flow from 20000023 transaction, the base amount ignore the interests like below:
03/03/2010 – Base amount 4.632,00 and Interest 36,94
03/04/2010 – Base amount 4.632,00 and Interest 36,94
03/05/2010 – Base amount 4.634,65 and Interest 36,96
03/06/2010 – Base amount 4.634,65 and Interest 36,96
03/07/2010 – Base amount 4.638,89 and Interest 37,00
The base amount does not consider the interests from month. The interests are capitalized only to the next month. 
Best regards
Eduardo schalch

Similar Messages

  • Avoid positive commissions for a bilateral facility

    Dear gurus:
    I’m new in FSCM world and I am facing the following problem:
    In a bilateral facility product (obtained) I’ve defined a charge for the “amount utilized”. It doesn’t work when the company makes a transfer bigger than the amount utilized to the credit line and it becomes negative (for some days the bank owes us an amount).
    In this case the system calculates positive commissions. I understand it but I do not want it to do so!
    How can we limit the commissions only to the ones we have to pay to the bank??
    Thank you very much
    Alvaro Vivo

    Hi
    You get this error when profile class amounts are not set for all the currency.  Go back to your profile and ensure that the profile amounts are set for all the currencies found, whether you are using it or not.
    Regards

  • Excise base amount for Import PO in MIGO

    Dear All,
    I have create the Import Po and maintain all conditions i.e.JCDB,JCV1,JECV,J1CV,JEDB,JSDB,JADC and assign the custom vendor to conditions and make the custom payment through MIRO for planned delivery cost.
    Then while doing the MIGO with referance to PO and commercial invoice,all duties are captyring correctly but excise base amount is showing base amount plus basic custom duty.Please give the solution is any setting missing in costomizing.
    And in MIGO item screen BED %(CVD%) is not showing but AED,ECSS,SECESS is showing correctly.
    Please give solution urgently.
    Regards,
    Vinay

    hi
    check following configuration
    path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>India >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
    if it is been done then check whole config as follows
    TOTAL IMPORT CONFIGURATION AND CYCLE
    in ur pricing u have to create following
    JCDB IN: Basic Custom Duty
    JCV1 IN : CVD
    JECV IN : Ed Cess on CVD
    J1CV IN : H&SECess on CVD
    JEDB IN : Ed Cess on BCD
    JSDB IN : H&SECess on BCD
    JADC Additional Duty of Custom
    JCV1, JECV, J1CV and JADC will go to Excise MODVAT Accounts and JCDB, JEDB and JSDB will get loaded on inventory.
    In M/06, for all above conditions, keep following controls;
    Cond. class A (Discount or surcharge) Plus/minus A (Positive)
    Calculat.type A (Percentage)
    Cond.category B (Delivery costs)
    Activate "Currency Conversion" and "Accrual"
    Now for setoff
    maintain the following conditions in excise default settings.
    JCV1, JECV, JADC
    path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>India >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
    along with ur tax procedure maintain these conditions in the specified fields
    JCV1 in CVD condition field.
    JECV in ECS condition field.
    JADC in ACD condition field.
    in case of SECess on CVD, no need to maintain.
    it is hardcode in the standard
    Vendor in GR 2 (Entry always possible)
    Import scenario
    1.Create material master of import goods.
    2. Create vendor master record of import vendor and Customs clearing vendor.
    3. Maintain CIN settings.
    4. Maintain J1id.
    5. Maintain Pricing procedure SAP standard JIMPOR.., maintain required conditions..JCDB, JCV1...
    6.Assign the schema to respective import vendor in purchasing view of VMR.
    7. Create import PO, check in conditions of JCDB, JCV1 the customs clearing vendor(Indian vendor) and percentage is assigned. This can be done by In condition tab select condtion then click on display, then enter.
    Save the PO.
    8. MIRO --Capture Bill Of Entry.(Commercial Invoice No.,).Customs clearing first .Here CVD will b converted to BED.
    9. Capture Excises invoice--j1iex.
    10.MIGO.
    12.Post Excise Invoice.
    13.MIRO...Payment to vendor(import vendor)

  • Excise Base amount not updated in J_1iexcdtl table -reg

    Dear Gurus,
    We have used SAP Ecc 5.0 Patch level 21. In patch level 20, SAP admit without delivery , can do commercial billing and excise billing in foreground. After batch update SAP not support excise invoice creation in foreground. It support only background. We have 2 senario. 1 is capex sales . ie. without material stock we have raise the comm.billing and excise billing. 2 is supplimentary billing. both the senario now getting effected because of no delivery. Asper SAP advise we have setting for background process excise invoice creation. Excise invoice created. but excise base amount not updated in j_1iexcdtl table. Using J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE user exit we are trying to update the same. For single material it works fine. But more than one material for the first material's base amount is updated in all materials. for your reference i have mentioned the codding . SAP advise it is possible to update excise base amount. But not possible to do. pl.adivse if any correct or guide to solve it.
    FUNCTION J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE.
    ""Local Interface:
    *"  IMPORTING
    *"     VALUE(EXCITM_BASE) TYPE  KOMV-KAWRT
    *"     VALUE(POSNR) TYPE  VBRP-POSNR
    *"  EXPORTING
    *"     VALUE(EXCITM_BASE) TYPE  KOMV-KAWRT
    *"  TABLES
    *"      KONV STRUCTURE  KONV
    *{   INSERT         RDSK925285                                        1
    TABLES : KONV.
    data :   W_INDEX LIKE SY-TABIX.
    DATA :ITAB LIKE TABLE OF KONV WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA :ITAB1 LIKE TABLE OF KOmV WITH HEADER LINE.
    ITAB1[] = KONV[].
    DATA : BEGIN OF I_TAB OCCURS 0,
           KAWRT LIKE KONV-KAWRT,
           POSNR LIKE VBRP-POSNR,
           END OF I_TAB.
    LOOP AT ITAB1.
    READ TABLE ITAB1 WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JMOD' KPOSN = ITAB1-KPOSN.
    IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
        EXCITM_BASE = ITAB1-KAWRT.
        POSNR = ITAB1-KPOSN.
    ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    *}   INSERT
    ENDFUNCTION.
    Thanks & Regards
    R.Udayakumar

    solved with the same user exit

  • Excise Duty Base Amount J_1IEXCDTL

    Hi All,
    After Creation of Excise Invoice the Field " Excise Duty Base Amount " is not getting updated , can any one give some idea on this
    Thanks In advance
    Siva

    Hi,
    Kindly ensure that in your SD Pricing procedure the condition type which
    has the Assesable value has been defined with Condition category 'H'
    through the transaction V/06, it is also expected to be non statistical
    in your pricing procedure. If it is statistical then refer the SAP
    note 1003634 which has the user exit J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE. This
    user exit has the KON strcuture of your billing, you can derevive the
    base value and pass it to the parameter EXCITM_BASE so that the excise
    base can be updated during billing. This has to implemented through
    SE37 transaction.
    Please note that the old documents can not be resolved with the above
    solution, you will have to write your own ABAP code and update the base
    price in the table J_1iexcdtl for the excise invoice created when you
    transfer the goods from factory.
    Regards,
    Murali

  • Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE -1

    Dear Friends,
    While Iam creating ARE-1 for the Exports Excise Invoice - Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE1
    thanks
    Sasi

    Dear Lakshmipathi,
    Earlier Liable to AT1 is ticked but not Indicator NCCD,I have checked after ticking the NCCD as well....
    In my pricing procedure i dont have the NCCD condition .....as its not required.
    In classify consditiontypes: I have maintained PR00 condition type as well along with Excise condition types...Do i need to maintain this PR00 anywhere else
    or
    Is there anything I need to do with the assesable value.......if so how should be the entry like in the pricing procedure?
    Can someone please provide me the solution...its very urgent
    Thanks
    Sasi

  • Unable to Change Withholding Tax Base Amount while creating Service AP Invoice through DI API?

    Dear All,
    I am trying to create Service AP Invoice through DI API.
    If I post the document without changing SAPPurchaseInvoice.WithholdingTaxData.TaxableAmount the dount ocument is created in SAP without any problem.
    But if I change amount in above field then DI API throws error Unbalanced Transaction.
    If I post same document in SAP with changed base amount it got posted in SAP without any Issue.
    Where I am doing wrong?
    please guide.
    Using:
    SAP B1 version 9 Patch Level 11
    Location : India.
    Thanks.

    Hi ,
    maybe you can find solution to these note 1812344
    1846344  - Overview Note for SAP Business One 8.82 PL12
    Symptom
    This SAP Note contains collective information related to upgrades to SAP Business One 8.82 Patch Level 12 (B1 8.82 PL12) from previous SAP Business One releases.
    In order to receive information about delivered patches via email or RSS, please use the upper right subscription options on http://service.sap.com/~sapidp/011000358700001458732008E
    Solution
    Patch installation options:
    SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 can be installed directly on previous patches of SAP Business One 8.82
    You can upgrade your SAP Business One to 8.82PL12 from all patches of the following versions:8.81; 8.8; 2007 A SP01; 2007 A SP00; 2007 B SP00; 2005 A SP01; 2005 B
    Patch content:
    SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 includes all corrections from previous patches for releases 8.82, 8.81, 8.8, 2007, and 2005.
    For details about the contained corrections, please see the SAP Notes listed in the References section.
    Notes: SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 contains B1if version 1.17.5
    Patch download:
    Open http://service.sap.com/sbo-swcenter -> SAP Business One Products -> Updates -> SAP Business One 8.8 -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Comprised Software Component Versions -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Win32 -> Downloads tab
    Header Data
    Released On
    02.05.2013 02:34:18  
    Release Status
    Released for Customer  
    Component
    SBO-BC-UPG Upgrade  
    Priority
      Recommendations/additional info  
    Category
      Upgrade information  
    References
    This document refers to:
      SAP Business One Notes
    1482452
    IN_Wrong tax amount was created for some items in the invoice with Excisable BOM item involves
    1650289
    Printing Inventory Posting List for huge amount of data
    1678528
    Withholding amount in the first row is zeroed.
    1754529
    Error Message When Running Pick and Pack Manager
    1756263
    Open Items List shuts down on out of memory
    1757641
    Year-end closing
    1757690
    SEPA File Formats - New Pain Versions
    1757898
    Incoming Bank File Format
    1757904
    Outgoing Bank File Format
    1762860
    Incorrect weight calculation when Automatic Availability Check is on
    1770690
    Pro Forma Invoice
    1776948
    Calendar columns are wrong when working with Group View
    1780460
    OINM column description is not translated
    1780486
    UI_System crash when you set extreme value of double type to DataTable column
    1788256
    Incorrect User-Defined Field displayed in a Stock Transfer Request
    1788372
    ZH: 'Unacceptable Field' when export document to word
    1788818
    RU loc: No freight in the Tax Invoice layout
    1790404
    Cash Flow Inconsistency when Canceling Payment
    1791295
    B1info property of UI API AddonsInstaller object returns NULL value
    1791416
    Adding a new item to BoM is slow
    1794111
    Text is overlapping in specific localization
    1795595
    Change log for item group shows current system date in all the "Created" fields
    1797292
    Queries in alerts should support more query results
    1800055
    B1if_ Line break issue in inbound retrieval using JDBC
    1802580
    Add Journal Voucher to General Ledger report
    1803586
    Not realized payment is exported via Payment Engine using 'SAPBPDEOPBT_DTAUS' file format
    1803751
    Period indicator of document series can be changed although it has been used
    1804340
    LOC_BR_Cannot update Nota Fiscal Model
    1805554
    G/L Account displayed in a wrong position when unticking the checkbox "Account with Balance of Zero"
    1806576
    Payment Cannot Be Reconciled Internally
    1807611
    Cannot update UDF in Distribution Rule used in transactions
    1807654
    Serial No./Batch inconsistency by canceled Inventory Transfer
    1808694
    BR: Business Partner Code cannot be updated with CNPJ CPF error
    1809398
    CR_Cannot Display Related Multi-Value Parameters
    1809758
    Arrow key not work for Batch/Serial Number Transactions Report
    1810099
    Tax Amount is Recalculated Even if Tax Code Is Not Changed
    1811270
    Upgrade fails on Serial And Batches object with error code -10
    1811846
    Cannot run Exchange Rate Differences when multi branch is activated
    1812344
    Withholding Tax Amount Is Not Updated in Payment Once Witholding Tax Code Is Changed in Document through DI API
    1812740
    DI:"Operation Code" show wrong value when add "A/P Tax Invoice" based on "A/P Invoice"
    1813029
    US_Vendor address on 1099 Summary by Form/Box Report is not updated according to the latest Invoice
    1813835
    Wrong amounts of Goods Return in Open Item List
    1814207
    Preliminary page prints setting does not keep after upgrade
    1814860
    Value "Zero" cannot be imported to "Minimum Inventory Level" field via Excel file
    1815535
    RFQ: Web front end not displayed in supplier language
    1815810
    GT: Adding Incoming Payment for Some Cash Flow Relevant Accounts Fails
    1816191
    BR:System Crashes While Working with Tax Code Determination Window
    1816611
    CR_Crystal Report Displayed Incorrectly Afte

  • Base Amount of CST/VAT with Excise tax code

    Hi Experts,
    Please tell us the base amount on which CST will triggered in BED+CST combination of TAX CODE.
    Regards
    Amit Tyagi

    Hai!
    Wherever BED is coming then exsice should be for its's manufacturing price not for purcahse price.so, use Assessable value as base amount for this combinations.
    Regards,
    Thanga Raj.K

  • Excise Duty Base Amount in J1IEX in case of Import Purchasing

    While posting Excise Invoice in case of Import Purchasing, duty values are coming from CVD, ACD, CVD Ecess & CVD SEcess. But I am not able to understand from where "Excise Duty Base Amount" is coming in J1IEX.
    Can anyone throw light on this?
    Thanks in advance

    This is known that CVD, ACD, CVD Ecess & CVD SEcess are coming from PO u2013 MIRO and Excise default (in SPRO).
    But my question is from where u201CExcise Duty Base Amountu201D is coming as it is neither maintained in PO nor in MIRO.
    Can anyone help?
    Thanks in advance

  • Change in excise base amount in J1IEX in case of import PO

    Hi,
    In case of import PO when we are making J1IEX ref. to MIRO number the excise base amount which is comin gin mIRO is different but all the Excise tax condition amount are coming properly.
    in one case in miro.
    CVD : 10%  = 3950.70
    Ecess          = 79.00
    SECESS       = 39.50
    Add. duty     = 1743.0
    according to this excise base amount should be 39507.00  but when we are capturing invoice ref. to MIRO  in J1IEX excise base amount is coming aroung 20138,
    can u help on this issue.
    regards,
    zafar

    HII
    Might be , while doing delivery cost invoice verification, u have done some mistake in MIRO.
    SO check the MIRO ,acconting document which has been generated during deliver cost verification.
    Then do J1IEX with refer to MIRO.
    Or Do it reference throu PO.
    Thanks

  • Creation of Service Tax code 10.30% on the 25% of the Base Amount

    Dear Team,
    We want to create a service tax code of 10.3% on the 25% of the Base amount.
    Base Amount - 100.00
    25% of the base amount(100/25) = 25.00
    service tax(10.30%) to be calculate on Rs. 25.00
    25*10.30% = 2.57
    Base amount --> 100.00
    Service Tax  -->      2.57
          Total:                     102.57
    Can somebody let me how to create the service tax code for this.
    Regards,
    Siva.

    Hi Randeep,
    As they said it is service tax GTA.Right we are doing out of SAP, we want it to be done in SAP
    The tax calculation will be like below
    service tax of 10.3%  has to caluclate on the 25% of the Base amount. Like
    25% is taxable and 75% is livied.
    Base Amount - 100.00
    25% of the base amount(100/25) = 25.00
    service tax(10.30%) to be calculate on Rs. 25.00
    25*10.30% = 2.57
    Base amount --> 100.00
    Service Tax  -->      2.57
            Total:           102.57
    Regards,
    Siva.

  • Condition type to be loaded on Material cost after Taxes but shouldn't change Tax base Amount.

    Customer requirement is that they want to deduct some amount after the Taxes (after BASB) &t load this amount value after taxes on Material cost  (hence accrual KEY can't  be used). but with the addition of this new condition type (for deduction) it shouldn't change the base amount  for Tax condition type (BASB).
    Basic Problem : new condition type value to be load on material (after taxes). but this condition value shouldn't change the Net price of PO(amount in BASB condition of Tax) so that base amount (BASB) of Tax procedure remain unchanged.
    (Since it is to be loaded on material hence i cant use account key definitely. Also this cost to be loaded on material after taxes)
    Ex -             PBXX =     100 base price
                     Freight =       20
       Tax base amnt =     120
                   Tax (5%)=          6
                          Total =    126
         Other Charges=      10  (this 10 Rs amount in this condition type required to be loaded on material cost, at the same time this condition value shouldn't change the base amount for the Tax (BASB)
    Please suggest (purpose is to load the deduction on material cost after Taxes & same time it shouldn't change the  the amount after Tax base calculation)

    Hi,
       Your condition type is without acrual flag in M/06. No acrual key is maintained in the MM pricing procedure.
       To achieve your requirement, maintain subtotal 6 against the condition type in your MM pricing procedure in M/08.
       Maintain the base type calc procedure as 362 against your BASB condition type in tax procedure. Keep the field blank for the tax condition type (VAT or CST / ED etc)
       Test the scenario again with a new PO. System will show the condition value in net amount field in PO, but the same wont be copied to BASB in tax procedure. Check the taxes pop up. Check the same and revert back.
    Note: Similar requirement (not exact) for acrual conditions are mentioned in my doc: Tax Calculation on Freight - Different Scenarios You may refer it if required.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Calculation of Excise Duty on Base Amount and VAT on Base Amount + ED

    Hi,
    WE have configured the Tax procedure and Tax code in Finance. However we want the Calculation as follows:
    Base Amount: 100
    ED: 10%-->10  On base Amount
    Cess:2-->2   On ED
    SHCS:1-->1 On ED
    Total = 113
    VAT 5% --> 5.65 on Total not on Base Amount.
    Print should come a total = 113+5.65 = 118.65
    But in my case it VAT Calculates on Base amount which we do not want.
    Provide Solution with configuration steps.
    Edited by: rmk123 on Apr 6, 2011 3:32 PM

    okie

  • Tax Calculation on Base amount in FB60

    Dear All,
    My client wants to calculate tax on base amount in FB60,
    he receives invoice from vendor with 6 items(i.e., 6 different types of expenses gl)
    and in that invoice he get the total tax amount not individual tax amount, here is the example :
    item 1       - 1402.50
    item 2       -  855.50
    item 3       - 3780.00
    Sub total   - 6038.00
    Tax 19%   - 1147.22 (tax amount for above 3 items)
    Total       - 7185.22
    In FB60 the system is calculating the  tax on net value i.e., we have to enter the total amount (7185.22) in header level and line item we have to enter the amount including the tax value
    item 1     -  1668.98 (1402.50 x 19%) - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same.
    item 2     -  1078.05 (855.50x 19%) -  - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same
    item 3     -  4498.20 (3780 x 19%)  -  - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same
    he is getting this type of invoices more and he dont want to do calculation for each and every item
    Please advice on this issue as early as possible.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    JS

    Thanks a lot Pascol
    Regards
    JS

  • Excise base amount not updated after creating Excise Invoice

    Dear Friends,
    The excise base amount is not getting updated in table J_1IEXCDTL u2013 EXBAS. System updates J_1IEXCDTL u2013 EXBAS, if condition category in the Base price condition type is maintained as H.But the problem comes when discounts are applicable.
    Say, the base price is Rs 10000 and there is a discount of Rs1000. If I maintain the condition category u2018Hu2019, the excise base value is getting updated as Rs10000, but it should be Rs 9000. But there is no problem with the BED/EDCess/SHEd cess which are calculated as expected based on the steps defined in the pricing procedure.
    I even tried using condition type JASS (Acc Seq JDUM -100% on the (Base price - Discount value and condition category H).It works only when JASS is set as Non-statistical.By doing so,Base price and also the Discounts conditions are getting inactive. When JASS is set as statistical, EXBAS is not getting updated.
    Thanks
    ISaac

    Hi  Issac,
    Use the below user exit to populate the excise base value.
    J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE.
    This user exit has the KONV strcuture of your billing, you can derevive
    the base value and pass it to the parameter EXCITM_BASE so that the exci
    se base can be updated during billing.
    Thanks and Regards
    MBS

Maybe you are looking for