Base amount is zero

Dear all,.
While c
pturing invoice , Base amount is calculated as Zero.
Tax is getting calculated in PO.
Migo is not yet done.
TAx procedure is TAXINN.
pl help.
Prabhash

Thanks seema
it was nice of u to reply with solution but actually my problem was while capturing excise invoice, and it had been solved.
now another problem is that my RG 23A register is not getting updated aftyer i capture the invoice.
Can you help me regarding the same??
Thanks in advance.
Prabhash

Similar Messages

  • Tax base amount is Zero in billing document

    Hi
    Tax base amount in the accounting document of my billing document shows zero value but in the header condition of the billing document  i am getting net value and tax amount separately.
    What could be the reason?.
    Best Regards
    Swami

    Hi
    I have already done that in VKOA, accounting document showing tax code, tax amount, GL account except Base amount.
    Best Regards
    Swami

  • Consignment and Tax Base Amount

    All,
    We are getting the error "the tax amount must not be greater than the tax base".   When doing a trace the Tax Base Amount is ZERO.   Can someone tell me where/how the tax base amount is determined?  
    Thank you,
    Sandra

    What I have found so far is the system calculates the base amount by adding the line items that have a tax code associated with it.  In the scenario I have it appears the tax code is not associated with any of the items on the settlement and therefore the tax base = 0.   
    This is SAP standard transaction MRKO in a 4.5B system.   The info record has a tax code on it and it does not appear to matter which tax code in on the info record.  
    Anyone have any ideas on where I can look or what to look for?    Is this a tax set up issue?  Is it a program error?   I've tried to find all the tax configuration and compare with a working example in the same system but have not been successful.  I've also looked in OSS and there are several OSS notes that are remotely related to consignment and taxes but we are on a fairly high hotpack # so .... just not sure where to go.
    Thanks for any suggestions.
    Sandra

  • Unable to Change Withholding Tax Base Amount while creating Service AP Invoice through DI API?

    Dear All,
    I am trying to create Service AP Invoice through DI API.
    If I post the document without changing SAPPurchaseInvoice.WithholdingTaxData.TaxableAmount the dount ocument is created in SAP without any problem.
    But if I change amount in above field then DI API throws error Unbalanced Transaction.
    If I post same document in SAP with changed base amount it got posted in SAP without any Issue.
    Where I am doing wrong?
    please guide.
    Using:
    SAP B1 version 9 Patch Level 11
    Location : India.
    Thanks.

    Hi ,
    maybe you can find solution to these note 1812344
    1846344  - Overview Note for SAP Business One 8.82 PL12
    Symptom
    This SAP Note contains collective information related to upgrades to SAP Business One 8.82 Patch Level 12 (B1 8.82 PL12) from previous SAP Business One releases.
    In order to receive information about delivered patches via email or RSS, please use the upper right subscription options on http://service.sap.com/~sapidp/011000358700001458732008E
    Solution
    Patch installation options:
    SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 can be installed directly on previous patches of SAP Business One 8.82
    You can upgrade your SAP Business One to 8.82PL12 from all patches of the following versions:8.81; 8.8; 2007 A SP01; 2007 A SP00; 2007 B SP00; 2005 A SP01; 2005 B
    Patch content:
    SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 includes all corrections from previous patches for releases 8.82, 8.81, 8.8, 2007, and 2005.
    For details about the contained corrections, please see the SAP Notes listed in the References section.
    Notes: SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 contains B1if version 1.17.5
    Patch download:
    Open http://service.sap.com/sbo-swcenter -> SAP Business One Products -> Updates -> SAP Business One 8.8 -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Comprised Software Component Versions -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Win32 -> Downloads tab
    Header Data
    Released On
    02.05.2013 02:34:18  
    Release Status
    Released for Customer  
    Component
    SBO-BC-UPG Upgrade  
    Priority
      Recommendations/additional info  
    Category
      Upgrade information  
    References
    This document refers to:
      SAP Business One Notes
    1482452
    IN_Wrong tax amount was created for some items in the invoice with Excisable BOM item involves
    1650289
    Printing Inventory Posting List for huge amount of data
    1678528
    Withholding amount in the first row is zeroed.
    1754529
    Error Message When Running Pick and Pack Manager
    1756263
    Open Items List shuts down on out of memory
    1757641
    Year-end closing
    1757690
    SEPA File Formats - New Pain Versions
    1757898
    Incoming Bank File Format
    1757904
    Outgoing Bank File Format
    1762860
    Incorrect weight calculation when Automatic Availability Check is on
    1770690
    Pro Forma Invoice
    1776948
    Calendar columns are wrong when working with Group View
    1780460
    OINM column description is not translated
    1780486
    UI_System crash when you set extreme value of double type to DataTable column
    1788256
    Incorrect User-Defined Field displayed in a Stock Transfer Request
    1788372
    ZH: 'Unacceptable Field' when export document to word
    1788818
    RU loc: No freight in the Tax Invoice layout
    1790404
    Cash Flow Inconsistency when Canceling Payment
    1791295
    B1info property of UI API AddonsInstaller object returns NULL value
    1791416
    Adding a new item to BoM is slow
    1794111
    Text is overlapping in specific localization
    1795595
    Change log for item group shows current system date in all the "Created" fields
    1797292
    Queries in alerts should support more query results
    1800055
    B1if_ Line break issue in inbound retrieval using JDBC
    1802580
    Add Journal Voucher to General Ledger report
    1803586
    Not realized payment is exported via Payment Engine using 'SAPBPDEOPBT_DTAUS' file format
    1803751
    Period indicator of document series can be changed although it has been used
    1804340
    LOC_BR_Cannot update Nota Fiscal Model
    1805554
    G/L Account displayed in a wrong position when unticking the checkbox "Account with Balance of Zero"
    1806576
    Payment Cannot Be Reconciled Internally
    1807611
    Cannot update UDF in Distribution Rule used in transactions
    1807654
    Serial No./Batch inconsistency by canceled Inventory Transfer
    1808694
    BR: Business Partner Code cannot be updated with CNPJ CPF error
    1809398
    CR_Cannot Display Related Multi-Value Parameters
    1809758
    Arrow key not work for Batch/Serial Number Transactions Report
    1810099
    Tax Amount is Recalculated Even if Tax Code Is Not Changed
    1811270
    Upgrade fails on Serial And Batches object with error code -10
    1811846
    Cannot run Exchange Rate Differences when multi branch is activated
    1812344
    Withholding Tax Amount Is Not Updated in Payment Once Witholding Tax Code Is Changed in Document through DI API
    1812740
    DI:"Operation Code" show wrong value when add "A/P Tax Invoice" based on "A/P Invoice"
    1813029
    US_Vendor address on 1099 Summary by Form/Box Report is not updated according to the latest Invoice
    1813835
    Wrong amounts of Goods Return in Open Item List
    1814207
    Preliminary page prints setting does not keep after upgrade
    1814860
    Value "Zero" cannot be imported to "Minimum Inventory Level" field via Excel file
    1815535
    RFQ: Web front end not displayed in supplier language
    1815810
    GT: Adding Incoming Payment for Some Cash Flow Relevant Accounts Fails
    1816191
    BR:System Crashes While Working with Tax Code Determination Window
    1816611
    CR_Crystal Report Displayed Incorrectly Afte

  • Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 payment

    The scenario is:
    Classic withholding tax functionality to be used for first time, the configuration was done last year.
    1099 needs to be printed with all payments made out to the vendor.
    There were payments made out to the Vendor in year 2011. There are some payments that show as WT exempt amount  in RC and other payments are displayed as WT base amount in RC while running RFIDYYWT or 1099 print out report.
    I used RFWT0020 program to regenerate the WT and Change to source tax code. It just updates the tax code on the payment document but is not changing the payment document amount from WT exempt to WTax base.
    So the 1099 printout is not showing the total payments made, it is excluding WT exempt amount in total.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks
    Edited by: Gary_S321 on Jan 11, 2012 10:30 PM

    Rebecca,
    You need to update the WTax base amount field on all the payment documents that are blank.
    For that just go to Vendor line item report FBL1n and run it for all the 1099 vendors. Change the layput to add WT base amount and WT Code in the report output. Filter the documennt type with payment doc types ZP and KZ and WTax base amount zero.
    Extract these transactions into excel and then write LSMW to mass update these tax base amount field.
    To update only Tax code on these transaction you can use RFWT0020 program.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks

  • With holding tax base amount is not showing in miro screen

    Dear All
    Whith holding tax amount is not showing in withholding tax tab after all posting also.
    but with holding tax posting is going on fine. in miro screen in withholding tax tab i am not getting this value correctly but it is showing 0 value.
    help me in this regard.
    Regrds,
    Sami

    Dear Sami,
    if the WT datas are zero in MIRO/MIR4 this is due to the Standard System Design. Usually You will have the correct WT data only into the FI follow on document. Only if You insert WT datas manually (wt base amount, wt amount) these will be saved into MIRO/MIR4 as well.
    I hope this helps in understanding the System behaviour.
    Have a nice day.
    Mauri
    Edited by: MAURIZIO BIANCOTTI on Oct 26, 2009 2:22 PM
    Edited by: MAURIZIO BIANCOTTI on Oct 26, 2009 2:22 PM

  • Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 invoice

    Hi Friends,
    Need your help again.
    Using T. Code FB09, i can change WHT base as long as the invoice is not cleared. However, how to change WHT base where a particular invoice has been cleared?
    I have actually made some cchanges to configuration where by i have removed tick for 'line item not cleared'. Ideally with this setting it should allow me to change to WHT base. But the same is not happening.
    Can any one help me out with  any other steps that are involved.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Rajanikanth

    Hi Rajanikant,
    Please review note 363650 here you will see the following
    information;
    C) Change Rules for classical and extended withholding tax
          If the withholding tax base amount should be changed after a
          docment has been paid already, the following steps are required:
          For Classical Withholding Tax and only if the withholding tax
         amount is zero.
         Change of withholding tax base amount or withholding tax code of a
         cleared invoice.
         If the withholding tax base amount and/or the withholding tax code
         needs to be changed after an invoice has been cleared please follow
         steps;
    As you see from the above information the following quotation "only if
    the withholding tax amount is zero".
    If a withholding tax amount other than zero has been posted, you cannot
    change the values via transaction FB02.
    Please also review the IMG documentation for transaction OB32 via
    spro -> Financial accounting -> Financial accounting global settings
    -> Document -> Line item -> Document change rules, line item.
    here you will see the following information;
    Document Change Rules, Line Item
    In this activity, you determine under which circumstances fields within
    posted documents can be changed.
    Note
    For a number of fields, the system itself determines that they can no
    longer be changed after posting. This includes all fields which are
    central to the principles of orderly accounting, for example, the amount
    posted and the account.
    The system also prevents the update objects from being changed in
    documents which have already been posted, independent of the document
    change rules
    Thus as you can see from the above description if an amount has been
    posted to the account you cannot change the fields despite entering in
    the field in OB32 as changable.
    with kind regards
    Cora

  • You are posting directly to a tax account. Enter the tax base amounts per i

    Hi Team,
    While posting JV againset to tax GL account we are getting bellow error message
    """"Enter the tax base amounts for account 351200 in company code 1111
    Message no. F5A375
    Diagnosis
    You are posting directly to a tax account. Enter the tax base amounts per item using the function "Tax Amounts"  """.
    Could any body let me know why we are not able to post JV to against Tax GL account...
    Thanks
    Vyshnava

    Hi Satish,
    Yes , I am posting JV to do zero balance to this tax GL account to Changing the tax code from  " >  Output Tax Account"  to   " *  All tax types allowed "..
    Thanks
    Vyshnava

  • BSET-HWBAS Tax Base Amount is wrong / double

    Dear Experts,
    We have a scenario where in IDOC comes from External system to SAP for posting. We are using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for doing the postings. I have nearly passed all the necessary parameters but still the Tax base amount in BSET is wrong. And it happens only for one tax code only.
    I have passed the GL Account details, Currency amount  and Tax amount details. For each tax line I am also filling the  the relevant item number i.e. BAPIACTX09-ITEMNO_TAX.
    Can you please suggest solution for this issue. I have tried to serach SAP notes + SDN post but could not get suitable solution.
    The current issue is as follows:
    40200001  AB      103,11- (i.e. 20% tax)
    75003000 VN       90,00-   (i.e. 10% tax)
    34000000 AB       20,62-   (i.e. tax calculated). Here I have entered only the tax items. The currency balance with other entries is zero.
    But when I have a look at Environment--> Tax Data then it shows Tax Base amount for "AB" as 206.22 (i.e. 1033.11 x 2). The tax base amount for VN is right as 90.
    Kindly advise.
    -Abhishek

    Solved by myself.
    Refer SAP Note 626235 for details. The Tax by-pass for BKPF-AWTYP was switched off. This customization is maintained in table TAX_APPLI.

  • MIRO invoice reduction balanced amount not zero

    Hi Team,
    Kindly help as I am getting balanced amount while posting invoice reduction and I am entering the following details:
    1) Invoice date
    2) Posting date
    3) Reference
    4) PO & enter
    5) Vendor error
    6) Entering the vendor amount same as in vendor invoice (also it is matching with the PO amount 266.25 and tax 20% 53.25)
    7) Accepted amount is zero as MIGO is for zero qty. because vendor liability should not open or pending.
    8) selection of check box for calculate Tax
    9) System calculating 317.50 including tax of 53.25 Balance amount is 317.50 - 319.50 = 1.60
    My issue is how this 317.50 is calculating by SAP whereas I have checked manually it should be 319.50 please extend you help.  
    With Regards,
    Avinash Kowale

    Are you sure the tax is calculated correctly i.e. 53.25?
    You meant to say the base is incorrect?
    Check the condition type may be wrong.
    Thanks,
    Kumar

  • Excise base amount for Import PO in MIGO

    Dear All,
    I have create the Import Po and maintain all conditions i.e.JCDB,JCV1,JECV,J1CV,JEDB,JSDB,JADC and assign the custom vendor to conditions and make the custom payment through MIRO for planned delivery cost.
    Then while doing the MIGO with referance to PO and commercial invoice,all duties are captyring correctly but excise base amount is showing base amount plus basic custom duty.Please give the solution is any setting missing in costomizing.
    And in MIGO item screen BED %(CVD%) is not showing but AED,ECSS,SECESS is showing correctly.
    Please give solution urgently.
    Regards,
    Vinay

    hi
    check following configuration
    path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>India >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
    if it is been done then check whole config as follows
    TOTAL IMPORT CONFIGURATION AND CYCLE
    in ur pricing u have to create following
    JCDB IN: Basic Custom Duty
    JCV1 IN : CVD
    JECV IN : Ed Cess on CVD
    J1CV IN : H&SECess on CVD
    JEDB IN : Ed Cess on BCD
    JSDB IN : H&SECess on BCD
    JADC Additional Duty of Custom
    JCV1, JECV, J1CV and JADC will go to Excise MODVAT Accounts and JCDB, JEDB and JSDB will get loaded on inventory.
    In M/06, for all above conditions, keep following controls;
    Cond. class A (Discount or surcharge) Plus/minus A (Positive)
    Calculat.type A (Percentage)
    Cond.category B (Delivery costs)
    Activate "Currency Conversion" and "Accrual"
    Now for setoff
    maintain the following conditions in excise default settings.
    JCV1, JECV, JADC
    path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>India >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
    along with ur tax procedure maintain these conditions in the specified fields
    JCV1 in CVD condition field.
    JECV in ECS condition field.
    JADC in ACD condition field.
    in case of SECess on CVD, no need to maintain.
    it is hardcode in the standard
    Vendor in GR 2 (Entry always possible)
    Import scenario
    1.Create material master of import goods.
    2. Create vendor master record of import vendor and Customs clearing vendor.
    3. Maintain CIN settings.
    4. Maintain J1id.
    5. Maintain Pricing procedure SAP standard JIMPOR.., maintain required conditions..JCDB, JCV1...
    6.Assign the schema to respective import vendor in purchasing view of VMR.
    7. Create import PO, check in conditions of JCDB, JCV1 the customs clearing vendor(Indian vendor) and percentage is assigned. This can be done by In condition tab select condtion then click on display, then enter.
    Save the PO.
    8. MIRO --Capture Bill Of Entry.(Commercial Invoice No.,).Customs clearing first .Here CVD will b converted to BED.
    9. Capture Excises invoice--j1iex.
    10.MIGO.
    12.Post Excise Invoice.
    13.MIRO...Payment to vendor(import vendor)

  • Excise Base amount not updated in J_1iexcdtl table -reg

    Dear Gurus,
    We have used SAP Ecc 5.0 Patch level 21. In patch level 20, SAP admit without delivery , can do commercial billing and excise billing in foreground. After batch update SAP not support excise invoice creation in foreground. It support only background. We have 2 senario. 1 is capex sales . ie. without material stock we have raise the comm.billing and excise billing. 2 is supplimentary billing. both the senario now getting effected because of no delivery. Asper SAP advise we have setting for background process excise invoice creation. Excise invoice created. but excise base amount not updated in j_1iexcdtl table. Using J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE user exit we are trying to update the same. For single material it works fine. But more than one material for the first material's base amount is updated in all materials. for your reference i have mentioned the codding . SAP advise it is possible to update excise base amount. But not possible to do. pl.adivse if any correct or guide to solve it.
    FUNCTION J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE.
    ""Local Interface:
    *"  IMPORTING
    *"     VALUE(EXCITM_BASE) TYPE  KOMV-KAWRT
    *"     VALUE(POSNR) TYPE  VBRP-POSNR
    *"  EXPORTING
    *"     VALUE(EXCITM_BASE) TYPE  KOMV-KAWRT
    *"  TABLES
    *"      KONV STRUCTURE  KONV
    *{   INSERT         RDSK925285                                        1
    TABLES : KONV.
    data :   W_INDEX LIKE SY-TABIX.
    DATA :ITAB LIKE TABLE OF KONV WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA :ITAB1 LIKE TABLE OF KOmV WITH HEADER LINE.
    ITAB1[] = KONV[].
    DATA : BEGIN OF I_TAB OCCURS 0,
           KAWRT LIKE KONV-KAWRT,
           POSNR LIKE VBRP-POSNR,
           END OF I_TAB.
    LOOP AT ITAB1.
    READ TABLE ITAB1 WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JMOD' KPOSN = ITAB1-KPOSN.
    IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
        EXCITM_BASE = ITAB1-KAWRT.
        POSNR = ITAB1-KPOSN.
    ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    *}   INSERT
    ENDFUNCTION.
    Thanks & Regards
    R.Udayakumar

    solved with the same user exit

  • Excise Duty Base Amount J_1IEXCDTL

    Hi All,
    After Creation of Excise Invoice the Field " Excise Duty Base Amount " is not getting updated , can any one give some idea on this
    Thanks In advance
    Siva

    Hi,
    Kindly ensure that in your SD Pricing procedure the condition type which
    has the Assesable value has been defined with Condition category 'H'
    through the transaction V/06, it is also expected to be non statistical
    in your pricing procedure. If it is statistical then refer the SAP
    note 1003634 which has the user exit J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE. This
    user exit has the KON strcuture of your billing, you can derevive the
    base value and pass it to the parameter EXCITM_BASE so that the excise
    base can be updated during billing. This has to implemented through
    SE37 transaction.
    Please note that the old documents can not be resolved with the above
    solution, you will have to write your own ABAP code and update the base
    price in the table J_1iexcdtl for the excise invoice created when you
    transfer the goods from factory.
    Regards,
    Murali

  • Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE -1

    Dear Friends,
    While Iam creating ARE-1 for the Exports Excise Invoice - Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE1
    thanks
    Sasi

    Dear Lakshmipathi,
    Earlier Liable to AT1 is ticked but not Indicator NCCD,I have checked after ticking the NCCD as well....
    In my pricing procedure i dont have the NCCD condition .....as its not required.
    In classify consditiontypes: I have maintained PR00 condition type as well along with Excise condition types...Do i need to maintain this PR00 anywhere else
    or
    Is there anything I need to do with the assesable value.......if so how should be the entry like in the pricing procedure?
    Can someone please provide me the solution...its very urgent
    Thanks
    Sasi

  • Base Amount of CST/VAT with Excise tax code

    Hi Experts,
    Please tell us the base amount on which CST will triggered in BED+CST combination of TAX CODE.
    Regards
    Amit Tyagi

    Hai!
    Wherever BED is coming then exsice should be for its's manufacturing price not for purcahse price.so, use Assessable value as base amount for this combinations.
    Regards,
    Thanga Raj.K

Maybe you are looking for