Basic image adjustments for landscape photos

I am wondering what some basic adjustments are in Aperture that people make to their landscape photos. I am at a high altitude, and many of my pics are bright and sometimes a little washed out. I use Auto Contrast sometimes, but then it sometimes goes too far, and appears too dark. I was just wondering if there are some routine adjustments that one can make to enhance the image, without making it look unnatural. Something just to take out the haze, without affecting color.

Hello Pritch,
I would recommend to adapt the camera to high altitude conditions, rather then to do too much post processing.
Pritch wrote:
I am at a high altitude, and many of my pics are bright and sometimes a little washed out. I use Auto Contrast sometimes, but then it sometimes goes too far, and appears too dark.
There are three scattering effects that do influence pictures at high altitudes: Rayleigh scattering, caused by scattering of the molecules of the atmosphere that tints the pictures blue,  Mie-Scattering and non-selective scattering from small particles (pollen, dust, fog) that makes them appear hazy and washed out. The amount of corruption depends on the meteoroligal conditions, only the Rayleigh scattering is always present.
At what altitude are you? Do you know, if the CCD-Sensor in your camera blocks UV-light completely  (some Sony sensors do) or lets some of  the UV pass? If the latter were the case, then you will notice quite a lot of Rayleigh-scattering from blue and UV light turning your pictures blue at high altitudes, and you might consider to use a Skylight filter or even an UV Filter; in lower terrain that usually is unnecessary, since the lens absorbs most of the UV.
For landscape photograpy the filter should be a flare less one, otherwise the lens flare will spoil the picture.
And - if you do not do it already - correct the white balance at the time you take the picture, the default white balance settings of the camera usually are optimized for lower terrain.
To correct the effects of Rayleigh scattering after taking the picture you have to adjust the colors selectively to dim the blue, depending on the amount of additive blue in the picture. A white balance correction might do that if you are lucky.
The Mie scattering and non selective scattering reduce the contrast and dim the colors by adding white to the picture. To compensate them you would need a white-subtraction filter (not white balance), Aperture does not have it.
But you can achieve quite good results with a combination of black point correction, enhance definition, enhance contrast, and a slight increase of saturation. I cannot recommend default settings for these filters, because the amount of correction needed will depend on the meteorological conditions. Also, you may not want to remove the haze completely, because it will give depth to the picture and might be artistically pleasing.
A nice example on how to deal with haze is in this thread
Regards
Léonie

Similar Messages

  • Sharpness of NEF raw conversion for landscape photo is poor compared to ViewNX raw conversion

    Raw conversion in ViewNX is far sharper than Aperture for some photos, enough so to differentiate as usable or unusable images. I tried adjusting sharpness and edges sliders in "RAW Fine Tuning" adjustments but even at maximum is terribly blurry compared to default ViewNX raw conversion. Overall color and dynamic range seem better in ViewNX for landscape shots but not critical like the blurriness... the difference is profound so I think I'm doing something wrong or the 3.2 update may have a serious bug. Anyone else have thisissue?
    Aperture 3.2:
    ViewNX:

    I was talking with some others in another forum and someone suggested ViewNX may be automatically applying settings from camera default picture settings. So I just checked and in
    menu->shooting menu->set picture control
    (Nikon D90)
    the standard "SD" setting is set to sharpen value 7 on a scale of 0-9.  Sounds like ViewNX is reading that value and applying some very strong sharpening in software on the raw image. However, I'd expect to set the Aperture RAW fine tune sharping adjustment to 100% and get reasonable close to similar sharpness. At this point I think I understand the issue but I also feel that ViewNX is much better able to sharpen the RAW image while introducing less unwanted artifacts.  It's a pretty significant point and I'd be quite happy to see improvement in sharpness from Aperture RAW conversion of NEF files.
    I don't suppose there is any way I can configure Aperture to use the Nikon RAW converter? I'd love to have the option to choose or switch back and forth depending on the picture and results. There are times I prefer Apertures converter to Nikons.

  • Image quality for displaying photos

    I like to use my Apple TV (3rd gen) for displaying photos taken with a variety of devices - Fuji X100s, iPhone 5, Nikon d7000. The output from these devices looks great on my 3Gen iPad but quite a bit less so on the 1080p Samsung tv, they almost look a little pixelated. On the other hand, Apples stock screen saver photos look great on the same tv.
    I don't believe that my cameras don't take good enough jpg's to display well and have concluded that Apple may be doing something to their photos that I haven't figured out.
    Any suggestions?

    Not all my photos are great to begin with, many are taken in poor lighting conditions, but the good photos are equally as good as the stock photography.

  • Image Resolution for Printing Photos

    I am not sure if the resolution/files size requirements are the same for both inkjets (e.g. Epson) and taking your camera's SD card to a local self-serve kiosk (e.g. CVS).
    I have been taking photos at the larger file size with my Canon Powershot and importing them into iPhoto. But I just realize that I am going to have a gigantic iPhoto library a lot sooner then expected.
    But let's say I wanted to print theses images to a typical 4" x 6" dimension gloss paper stock. What is the rule of thumb in terms of minimum/ideal resolution and file size of the image(s) that I want to print? What about 8.5" x 11"?
    Below is the available settings for my camera:
    L = 4000 x 3000 = 12MB file
    M1 = 3264 x 2448 = 8MB file
    M2 = 2592 x 1944 = 5 MB file
    M3 = 1600 x 1200 = 2MB file
    S = 640 x 480 = 0.3 MB file
    Sometime when I open the original JPG in Photoshop the resolution is at 72 lpi. Other times it will be 180 lpi. I guess I am trying to get a sense of what resolution I should set my camera at and what adjustments do I need to make (if any) when it is time to print to paper stock.

    The rule of thumb is 300 dpi. But it's  rule of thumb and you can get excellent images from 180 or less with a: a good printer and b: (most importantly) a good shot, well focused and exposed.
    So to find out the maximum you'll get at 300dpi from your list, just divide the numbers by 300: 4000 x 3000 / 300 = 13.3 x 10 print.
    For my money: set your camera to the best quality and size always. It's easy to through throw away bits og a photo, but you can't add in missing bits after the fact. Maximum everything gives you most margin for error.
    If you're worried about space then remember you can run a Library from an external drive:
    Make sure the drive is formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled)
    1. Quit iPhoto
    2. Copy the iPhoto Library from your Pictures Folder to the External Disk.
    3. Hold down the option (or alt) key while launching iPhoto. From the resulting menu select 'Choose Library' and navigate to the new location. From that point on this will be the default location of your library.
    4. Test the library and when you're sure all is well, trash the one on your internal HD to free up space.
    Regards
    TD

  • How to set image size for importing photos from a digital camera

    I'm using Iphoto 6 and am a novice user of my new digital camera. The camera is set to HQ image quality. Initially when I imported photos from the camera into IPhoto, the images were very large (over 1 meg) and produced good quality 4X6 prints. Now when I import photos from the same camera still set to HQ image quality, the photos are very small (less than 100 kb) after being imported into IPhoto. I think I must have changed some kind of setting in IPhoto that affects the size of an imported image, but I can't find where that is or how to change it back so that the size is not changed when imported. Can someone please help me with this? Thanks!
    IMAC G5   Mac OS X (10.3.9)   my other computer is a Dell Dimension L500CX running Windows XP Pro

    Dave, thanks for clarifying Toad's response for me - I was just too ignorant to connect the dots from his responses. As you said, there were 2 versions - 1 in the original folder and 1 in data; the original folder had the photos that were 1 mb. We must have pulled from that folder previously to print photos not realizing they existed in 2 places. So when we found these thumbnail photos, we just thought they were the real thing. Where can you go to learn about the struction and hierarchy of the photos in terms of what Iphoto does to an image when you import it? Is it in Iphoto help somewhere? Thanks so much for your help with this, and you too Toad for leading me down the path.
    If you're getting the size from Finder, I think Old
    Toad's question makes a lot of sense. Is the file
    you're looking at, somewhere in a folder called
    "Data" in iPhoto Library? That 56k sounds about the
    right size for a thumbnail.
    If you do a search for the image name, both the
    actual photo and the small thumbnail are stored with
    the same image, e.g. abc.jpg
    IMAC G5   Mac OS X (10.3.9)   my other computer is a Dell Dimension L500CX running Windows XP Pro

  • Date and Time adjustments for multiple photos

    Hello, thanks for providing the space for new users, and thanks in advance for your assistance.
    I am currently moving out of apple aperture/iphoto and across to lightroom 5.
    The OCD part of me likes to have my library organized, and I noticed that when I transferred my library across it is in a bit of a mess, so I am currently in the process of organizing the library and cleaning it up (approximately 18000 photos)
    Any how, I have almost settled on a folder structure (YYYY/MM - I feel for the number of photos I have trying to nut down to day might be to much - happy to receive advise on this also)
    For the most part, the photos have correct date and time from the commencement of the digital era (for me 2006 onwards)
    Photos pre 2006 are in negative form, and I am currently in process of having these scanned and imported into library, I have a batch done every month.  Adjusting the date and time from the creation date is where I am running into trouble.
    I have looked around the web and various forums to no avail.
    Firstly, I organize the photos into the correct order.  I then select the first photo and the then select the remaining photos.  I then select the adjust date/time from the menu and select the first option, adjust to new date and time, lets say 01/01/1990 at 1200 PM.
    The result I end up with is the first photo (the more selected photo if correct term) has 01/01/1990 @ 1200 as date and time, the remaining have 01/01/1990 as date (if I am lucky), and the times jump all over the place.  Sometimes it wont even change the date time for the remaining photos.
    What I am trying to achieve is either the same Date/Time for all the photos when I select a batch, or have them increment in time by a standard amount (i.e 1 minute (1200/1201/1202) or 1 second (1200:00/1200:01/1200:02)), and I just dont seem to be able to work this out to automatically do this, currently I have to achieve this by a manual adjusting each photo (some 200 at a time) which is really labor intensive
    Thanks in advance, and hoping an easy solution
    Regards
    Dean

    Thanks, that seemed to fix the problem.
    Workflow is:
    1) In grid view arrange photos in correct order
    2) Rename photos with a name & sequence (i.e. photos-1), this appears to then keep the photos organized as how I had arranged in grid view
    3) Export photos & delete original photos from my master library
    4) Open exported photos in an EXIF editor and change date & time to a common format (I am currently using the seasons as a guide, i.e. the photos that I recall being taken in spring are dated the first day of spring, using noon as the time)
    5) Import back to Lightroom and organizing as per my usual structure.
    This has allowed me to easily batch change date and times, keeping the correct order and has drastically reduce my workload, thanks for the suggestion!

  • Master Images Unavailable for Some Photos

    I have permanently deleted some photos that either I've done edits on and prefer the edits, or just poor photos. However, I've now ended up in a situation where when I publish an album to MobileMe or AppleTV, Aperture seems to want to access these deleted masters. I didn't like them, hence the deletion, how can I find what it is that is referencing the deleted masters?

    Manage Referenced Files Option allowed me to find which preview Aperture could not find the master for. I had not appreciated that the default view in Aperture shows you unrated or better photos, which means photos you mark as rating 9 or X are not shown - so when you copy/move photos around you do it without touching the 9 or X photos. In reorganising photos I managed to delete masters because of this view setting but still have versions derived from them.

  • Applying the same adjustments to multiple photos

    hi guys
    apologizes in advance, i dont have the manual handy - is there a way i can copy all the adjustments made on one photo and apply it to another?
    thanks

    I have run into a problem using the Copy & Paste adjustments for multiple photos. If I Copy the adjustments made to one photo, then paste those adjustments onto other photos, they appear to be applied, however when I tried to upload these photos to Flickr I found that the photos uploaded were the originals, not the adjusted versions. When I went back into iPhoto, selected one of these files in question, and selected "show file" I was shown an un-modified version of the photo stored in the Modified folder.
    Once I went back in and adjusted all of the photos manually, they uploaded to Flickr properly and when I selected them in iPhoto and requested "show file" I was shown the midified version, stored in the Modified folder.

  • Is there a substitute tool path for "Image Adjustments Variations-" in Photoshop CS6 Standard Addition?

    Is there a substitute tool path for "Image>Adjustments>Variations…" in Photoshop CS6 Standard Addition that brings similar results?  I was used to using Image>Adjustments>Variations… in Photoshop CS4 Standard Standard Addition quite often. I upgraded to Photoshop CS6 Standard Addition to get the 64bit memory architecture compatibility on my Macbook Pro, booted in Mountain Lion.  I see now that Photoshop CS6 Standard Addition has the "Image>Adjustments>Variations…" tool path removed.
    I don't have Photoshop CS6 Extended, which has the all new Image>Adjustments>Variations… tool path.  I only have Photoshop CS6 Standard Addition so, if anyone can share with me a substitute tool set that can give me similar results to using the old "Image>Adjustments>Variations…,"  I would appreciate it.

    Thanks, R_Kelly.
    You helped me to start exploring other tools in the Image>Adjustments Menu.  "Image>Adjustments>Color Balance…" seemed to help me get the results that "Image>Adjustments>Variations…" used to deliver.  "Image>Adjustments>Photo Filter>Warming Filter (85)" also got me to where I wanted to be in desired adjustments.  I used to get the results I wanted in brightness, contrast, mid-tone adjustment, and color balance buy using just Curves, Variations, and Hue/Saturation.  Now I'll use "Color Balance…" and "Photo Filter>Warming Filter (85)" along with Curves, and Hue/Saturation.  I also have learned to use "Levels" some more to get the same effect as Adjustments>Variations…"  I always thought there were more technically precise adjustment tools to get the same effect as "Image>Adjustments>Variations…"  Adobe dropping Variations in Photoshop CS6 Mac version forced me to learn better image adjustment approaches for pre press color correction and image warming.  I feel confident now to make Photoshop CS6 my prime-time work tool and move the Photoshop CS4 launch icon off of my Mac OS app Dock.  Thanks again, R_Kelly.

  • IPhoto frustrating error..The volume for "Df23.JPG" cannot be found. It prompts for all photos with this issue rather than offering an option to ignore. I can find the images in spotlight but not in Find Photo. Does anyone have a solution

    iPhoto frustrating error..The volume for "Df23.JPG" cannot be found. It prompts for all photos with this issue rather than offering an option to ignore. I can find the images in spotlight but not in Find Photo. Does anyone have a solution?

    Unless you have the source files that were on the TC or Windows machine you will have to start over with a new library as follows:
    Start over from scratch with new library
    Start over with a new library and import the Originals (iPhoto 09 and earlier) or the Masters (iPhoto 11) folder from your original library as follows:
    1.  Move the existing library folder to the desktop.
    2. Open the library package like this.
    Click to view full size
    3. Launch iPhoto and, when asked, select the option to create a new library.
    4. Drag the Masters (iPhoto 11) folder from the iPhoto Library on the desktop into the open iPhoto window.
    Click to view full size
    This will create a new library with the same Events as the original library but will not keep the metadata, albums, books slideshows and other projects.  Your original library will remain intact for further attempts at fixes is so desired.
    OT

  • TS3195 My mac mini (Snow Leopard, v10.6.8) does not acknowledge my iphone 4, iphone 4s or ipad2 in iPhoto, Image Capture, iSync or Preview but it does in iTunes.  I am at a loss for importing photos, short of emailing them.  Glitch with OS X 10.6.8 ?

    My Mac Mini (v10.6.8) does not acknowledge my iphone as a device in iPhoto, Image Capture, iSync or Preview although, iTunes does.  I am at a loss for importing photos other than emailing them to myself. Same problem with my iphone 4, iphone 4s, ipad2 and New iPad. Is this a problem with OS X 10.6.8 as I read some posts claim? Please help.

    I was able to import photos in iPhoto and Image capture when I was running SL 10.6.8 on my older MacBook.
    Did you try quitting everything, restart the Mac and then try again?
    Are there any updates at all for the Mac? I was helping one user not all that long ago and there were updates for her Mac software that had nothing to do with the OS and when she downloaded the updates - the iPad was then recognized in iTunes.

  • Automatic image compression for photo gallery web apps?

    Is it possible to scale and compress images to a maximum size when uploading to a web app? This is for a photo gallery that allows public submissions, and we are anticipating that we will get lots of photos that are very large. This is a task that would be best handled by a server-side image processing lib, but is there another way since we don't have that on BC?
    Thanks!

    I understand that you are probably concerned with data storage limits when asking this question. But, you can create thumbnails when displaying images within the photo gallery. This will allow a very large image to display very quickly within the gallery.

  • Photo image size for letterpress card

    I'm trying to create a simple card in iPhoto 11 and am having some difficulties.
    The various card themes have several layout options. Each option requires a certain size image (or sizes - some layouts are for more than one image).
    How am I supposed to know what size of image will fit in each "layout box"?
    Am I supposed to just play with the size of the image by resizing a JPG until it fits? Too time consuming - I've tried and I just can't get it to fit. Obviously I missing something simple if this is to be an "easy way to quickly make a card". I cannot find the required image size for the various layouts anywhere, so I'm clearly missing something.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1035 tells me recommended resolutions, but they are too big to fit into a card.
    NOTE: I'm not talking about cropping an image or resizing it, which I can do. 
    I just need to know the size these card layouts require! Where is this information located, or what am I doing wrong?
    Am I confusing DPI and pixels and resolution and ....?
    Thanks in advance for any help!
    Best,
    Kurt

    I'm not clear on whatyou are not clear on
    You simply drag photos to the enpty photo frames in the template - there are move and pan controls if you want to change the position of the photo - you can reight click on a photo and select "fit to frame" in most themse if the photo ratios do not match teh frame ratios and yo are losing parts of the photo
    the only "resolution" concern you have is that the photos are at least 180 DPI and if they are not you will get a warning
    "Note: A yellow warning triangle with an exclamation point in the center may appear if the resolution is too low (below 180 DPI)."
    The article you referenced gives Minimum pixel sizes for various uses - if your photo are that size or larger you are fine
    The pixel size is shown in teh info window for a photo
    LN

  • Diappearing photos replaced by an exclamation point within a triangle.  Prior to loading Lion I could put the image number in finder and locate the original file for that photo.  How do I restore photos now?

    I had problems with photos disappearing and being replaced by an exclamation point within a triangle.  I can see the photo in the thumbnail summary but when you click on it, the screen goes black and the exclamation point within a triangle appears along with the info on the original image number (i.e., img_1120.jpg). Prior to loading Lion, I could go to Finder, enter the image number and locate the original file for that photo.  I could then restore it for editing, copying into Print Shop directly, etc.   That no longer works after installing Lion.   How do I restore photos now?  I have 100s of photos that I have been going back to the original files and restoring and I am frantic that I will no longer be able to get to the original files.  Please help!  Thanks

    The ! turns up when iPhoto loses the connection between the thumbnail in the iPhoto Window and the file it represents.
    What version of iPhoto? Assuming 09 or later:
    Option 1
    Back Up and try rebuild the library: hold down the command and option (or alt) keys while launching iPhoto. Use the resulting dialogue to rebuild. Choose to Rebuild iPhoto Library Database from automatic backup.
    If that fails:
    Option 2
    Download iPhoto Library Manager and use its rebuild function. This will create a new library based on data in the albumdata.xml file. Not everything will be brought over - no slideshows, books or calendars, for instance - but it should get all your albums and keywords back.
    Because this process creates an entirely new library and leaves your old one untouched, it is non-destructive, and if you're not happy with the results you can simply return to your old one. .
    Regards
    TD

  • Iphoto photo import - best image type for max resolution (jpg vs tiff)

    What is the recommended image type for maximum resolution of photos brought into iphoto albums, since I will be enlarging them? (ie assuming everything brought into iphoto is set/reduced to a standard resolution, then jpg might allow more digital data for later enlargement; on the other hand tiff is often recommended for best resolution though it requires more space). Thanks, - D

    Thanks, Terence - OK, lets assume I shoot a 5-meg photo of a painting and adjust the paralax etc in photoshop so it is perfectly set inside the rectangular format. Now I want to import it into iphoto, knowing that I will use the crop tool to make two blow-up enlargements to go along with the original full-size image... total 3 related images of the artwork. As you mentioned these will eventually go into iweb as part of a series inside an album, with a hyperlink connecting the two enlargements to the full-size image... so viewers can tap to see finer detail and then go back to the overall composition. My question is, for the original photo image of the painting should I drag a 10-meg tiff into iphoto or a 2-meg jpg? (I do not know what importing the image into iphoto does to the original in terms of final image resolution and data size... Will a 2-meg jpg provide sufficient data to work with and enlarge via the cropping, or would the 10-meg tiff be better as a starting point? Or, if everything gets translated into a certain pre-ordained size anyway, would the tiff get watered down to, say, a 2-meg-size image anyway?) Thanks, - D

Maybe you are looking for