Batch capture takes twice as long to capture

Weird problem. Say I have 3 clips on a single tape (this happens across all tapes and projects) I log them and then select them to batch capture.
All, seemingly, goes well, they cue up and the log and capture screen says "item 1 of 3" or "2 of 3" etc.. but then when it looks like it is done, rather than end, it goes all the way back to the beginning and seemingly re-captures all footage! When I check my capture scratch folder, i only have one file for each capture sequence.
Thus, my capturing takes 2x as long to capture!
any ideas?
thanks
FC Studio 2 (i.e. FCP 6.x)

So it's PAL footage? or NTSC? anamorphic?
Odd though, never seen this behavior, so not sure how to troubleshoot it other than to rebuild your startup disk... (the old sledge hammer approach). It shouldn't be happening though and likely won't with all the setup being clean (as in rebuilding your startup disk). It's all up to the latest too right? 104.11 or or 10.5.2, and QT 7.4.1? FCP 6.0.2, right?
Jerry

Similar Messages

  • IDVD 6 encoded takes twice as long as iDVD 5?

    I did a quick search of archives but if this has been answered and I missed it, I apologize.
    I tried upgrading to iLife 6 (since this computer was purchased in December it came with iLife 5). Even using the identical menus I used from iDVD 5 in iDVD 6, encoding times are -at least- double in iDVD 6. To confirm this I deleted iLife 6 and reinstalled iLife 5 and encoded the same projects in iDVD 5 and the time difference really is a factor of 2! I tried the usual: repair permissions, installed the latest updates to iDVD 6 but the differenence remains with iDVD 6 taking twice as long to encode the same project.
    Is this consistent with others' experiences?
    Is there something I'm missing here?

    Thanks John, the old discussion was helpful. It seems that others have found iDVD 6 to be a dog on non-Intel Macs as well and, in some cases, experienced even worse than a 100% slowdown if I read some of the posts correctly.
    I hate to think that -this- is how Apple is claiming that Intel Macs are so much faster, by creating Universal Apps that run terribly on non-Intel Macs! My computer is a currently shipping model (I was stupid enough to believe the story that that Intel Pro machines wouldn't be released until 2007). If Apple software isn't optimized for it's own shipping hardware, which seems to be the case... sorry to digress
    Anyway, I'll try to have some specific comparison results later after I reinstall 6. I checked and iDVD 5 was running consistently at 230-240% CPU usage with peaks of 270% so it is doing a good job of using the multiple processors (processor performance set to "automatic"). It'll be interesting to see what iDVD 6 does in that regard.

  • IMovie 08 takes twice as long to produce inferior output

    I'm using a Sony HC42 miniDV camera. It records in wide screen format.
    In iMovie 6 it takes 9 minutes to save a QuickTime movie of about 2-1/2 minues duration. In iMovie '08 it takes 18 minutes to save the same movie.
    The QuickTime from iMovie 6 file is much better quality, perhaps because it uses the true resolution of the source material which is 869x480 pixels. iMovie 08 insists on converting the video capture to 960 x 540.
    Samples of both can be seen here:
    http://www.bmumford.com/tmp/imovie/

    Bryan Mumford wrote:
    I'm using a Sony HC42 miniDV camera. It records in wide screen format.
    In iMovie 6 it takes 9 minutes to save a QuickTime movie of about 2-1/2 minues duration. In iMovie '08 it takes 18 minutes to save the same movie.
    The QuickTime from iMovie 6 file is much better quality, perhaps because it uses the true resolution of the source material which is 869x480 pixels. iMovie 08 insists on converting the video capture to 960 x 540.
    Samples of both can be seen here:
    http://www.bmumford.com/tmp/imovie/
    wow.. thanks for the comparison.

  • Query takes twice as long for identical database on two seperate systems.

    Hi, I am looking for some help with a performance issue on a particular database.
    I am executing the query
    'for $o in collection("rx.dbxml")/rx[dbxml:metadata("janusId")="12345"] order by $o/@dos descending return <item id="{ replace(dbxml:metadata("dbxml:name", $o),"&#34;", "_") }"> {$o} </item>'
    on two different systems through a python xmlrpclib ServerProxy object. This is the my test query but the performance of other queries exhibits the same issue.
    The data on both systems is identical and the time required to execute this query is the same for both systems across
    every database, except for one. For this particular database, the time required to execute the query on System B is double
    that of System A.
    This is only the case for one particular database which makes me think that it is a data issue?
    However the data is identical on both systems.
    Is anyone aware of any data related issues that would cause such a performance hit based on
    the different setups listed below? What should be my next step in diagnosing this problem?
    System A
    - 1 x Quad core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5450 @ 3.00GHz
    - 32 GB RAM
    - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 5.1 (Tikanga)
    - Berkeley dbxml 2.4.13 patched to 2.4.16
    - bsddb3 4.5.0
    - Python 2.4.4
    - Twisted 8.2.0
    - SOAPpy 0.12.0
    - Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/sda5 39G 33G 4.3G 89% /
    System B
    - 2 x Dual core Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU @ 2.80GHz
    - 12 GB RAM
    - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 5.3 (Tikanga)
    - Berkeley dbxml 2.4.16
    - bsddb3 4.7.5
    - Python 2.4.4
    - Twisted 8.2.0
    - SOAPpy 0.12.0
    - Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 384G 88G 277G 25% /
    Thanks for any help.

    Try looking at db_stat output for each system for the query itself.
    1. clear stats:
    db_stat -Z -m
    2. run the query
    3. look at stats:
    db_stat -m
    Note any suspicious differences. You can/should also monitor disk and IO during the queries. If the plans are truly the same and the data is the same that points at system differences which would mostly be IO. At least that's the first place to look.
    Regards,
    George

  • Can't batch capture, no pre-roll

    I am trying to re-capture some footage. The problem is, I needed the beginning of the tape, so I originally captured from the start of the tape. Now, I can't batch capture because there is "not enough pre-roll" (not a direct quote, but that is the error it is giving me).
    How can I fix this? Is there a way to change how long the pre-roll will take? Or is there a way to edit the in point on the clip?
    Thanks, like always!
    Matthew

    Well.... NEXT TIME you'll know to always have adequate pre-roll on your footage.
    THIS TIME, first, change the inpoint on the batch capture that contains the offending portion to a place where you can reliable capture the clip you need. Then do a capture now of the head of the tape up until the new in point of that clip. Be sure to give yourself adequate overlap so you don't lose any frames.
    Does that make sense?

  • HDV Batch Capture Preroll

    Others have had the problem of not being able to do effective Batch Captures due to the computer's inablity to locate the timecode (it seems especially true of Canon cameras and HDV--so, the XLH1). The solution is to just capture the whole tape and then delete the unwanted clips. I'm wondering if there is a smoother way of fixing this problem.
    I can get FCP to batch capture as long as I'm willing to sit by the computer and tell it to "Continue" 3-5 times each time it has to fast forward. The computer fliddles around the timecode point until it finally decides that the timecode indeed exists.
    Thus, it's not that the computer doesn't know what the timecode is at that moment. Rather, it seems to get hung up on just when to strat rolling so it can begin capturing at the right time. This, as far as I can tell, would be a Preroll problem.
    So, is there a way to force FCP to give the tape a little more space and just start rolling? Or, could we petition for Apple to give the computer a bit more time? Or... something.
    Any other ideas, thoughts, comments? Am I way off?
    Sorry for such a long post.
    ~Luke

    Hi everyone,
    Just thought i'd take a minute to post back and update the forum with the outcome. After many more tries and batch capturing with HDV and DV and in great frustration, I came upon a wonderful post (sorry can't remember who/where) in which the OP said they were having the very same issues as me. The solution was staring me in the face the whole time: Quicktime.
    All I did in the end to overcome my problem was to plug in the camera, check QT preferences were set to source: HDV camera and Native resolution, then just hit play on the camera and start up a new movie recording!
    This captures the tape in one complete clip. Though obviously it does not pull across timecode, and due to the nature of manually hitting play on the camera and record in QT, would make it difficult to reconnect media in the future, however it HAS successfully captured footage in its original resolution, ready to be imported into final cut and subclipped.
    Hope this helps someone. It was by no means my ideal workaround, but having backed up the file taken from QT, has at least saved me this once!
    Thankyou for all your help,
    Best,
    Adam

  • Batch Capture Sequence Only

    Hey,
    I've been searching and cannot find any good info or a good process to batch capture only the media used in a sequence.
    I just had an old client contact me and want to do some simple updating of an older video project- changing text graphics and replacing a few shots.
    The project was longer- almost 15 minutes and was created/culled from a very large amount of source footage. All of that footage has long since gone offline.
    I've tried multiple times and processes to batch capture the the media used only in the sequence, but cannot seem to figure out a way to convince FCP to capture only the footage used. It continues to try and capture ALL the source media in the entire project.
    I know that on my old Avid system, all I had to do was select the sequence and click batch capture and it would do it with no problem (even grabbing handles on the new footage). It's frustrating that to do so on FCP is so difficult.
    Is there anyone out there who has found a solution or developed a process by which they can batch capture only the media in a sequence. If so, please share it with me.
    Thanks,
    Mike

    FCP can do the same as Avid's consolidation with the media manager, however when it's done, the original media has to still be online. (not your situation). I have gotten into the habit of creating a sequence that only references the media used in it, before I trash the original media because of this.
    I'd suggest an XML or EDL export of the sequence, reimport that and batch it. This new sequence will only reference the media used in it, and you can add handles to it during the batch capture. If you use an EDL, you could take your titles and graphics and edit them from the original offline sequence to the new.
    Jerry

  • Unable to locate timecode in batch capture

    Hi there, I have been working on this problem for a while and would really appreciate some help.
    I have a documentary project I have been working on for some time and have completed the EDL. I am now trying to batch capture the footage again in full res and am having problems with a couple of the tapes.
    First the specs:
    The video was shot on a Sony HDR-HC1 in HDV(1080) mode.
    I am using this camera to capture the footage.
    I am trying to recapture the footage in a sequence with the easy setting on HDV1080i50.
    I had originally captured the footage in SD on an older version of final cut pro (I am now working with FCP6) and didn't realise that my 16:9 footage was actually all 4:3 letterboxed. To fix this problem I used the media manager to export and then in the new project batch capture all the footage again from the tape. The project uses 18 tapes, 16 of which were batch digitised with only minor troubleshooting required. However 2 of the tapes are proving to be very problematic. It seems that whatever clip I select on the tape it gives me a message saying "unable to locate timecode".
    I have tried setting the tape to the exact location of the clip before selecting the batch capture, but the computer always seems to look for a spot which is 2-3 mins out of sync with the clip. For example, if the in point is 00:10:00:00 the computer will roll the tape to around the 00:12:00:00 mark and start jogging around there for about 30 seconds until eventually giving me the "unable to locate timecode" message. Looking in the information in the bins, the in and out points are accurate, its just that when I try to capture, the computer rolls the tape to the wrong position.
    If anyone knows a workaround for this that will help me avoid having to edit the footage all over again I will be extremely grateful.
    Thanks
    Liam

    HI I have the same problem, the capture window says: Waiting for time code, the device must set in vcr mode and then This operation could not be complete as there is no video, the F!#!%$$ problem is very illogical ,at this mooring I do batch capture without a problem but since the second tape this problem starting, I update to FCP 6.0.4 and,. @@#%#@%#$ the first tape capture but the second not capture and the problem starting againd, note that IMOVIE capture the tape and work very well, iI replace fire wire, camera VCR and , I trayu with Canon, Sony, JVC and the problem persist , I have quicktime 7.4.5, FCO 6.0.4, note that I have two Macs with the same problem in both macs IMOVIE work like a PRO edition Software but FCP is very bad, I have with this problem a long time, I formated Mac, reinstall FCS2 many timers and the problem persist. IS not a problem whit easy setup or wherever , I download the FireWire SDK from Apple and test all connection with the applications of sdk and in all case , the camera and the fire wire are OK, the problem is with quicktime and FCP, If any one is working OK with FCP and DV NTSC devices and JVC PRO HD devices, please tell us HOW DO. I'm working with FCP since 2000 and in this month FCP makes me very UNHAPPY.

  • Unable to batch capture with Premiere Pro CC via Kona LHi

    AJA's web site claims Premiere Pro CC is compatible with the Kona LHi card, but I can't get the two to work together properly. After repeated tries, I uninstalled and reinstalled everything AJA, but still no luck.
    I need to batch capture DV clips from some mini-DV tapes on my Sony MVR035U tape deck.  But I also need to upconvert them from 480i to 720p60 using my Kona Lhi card. I should be able to do this with Premiere Pro CC. But the PPCC Capture window won't give me any audio feedback when I select "AJA Movie Capture" in the Capture Settings pull down menu. I only get audio feedback when I enable "DV capture" but then I'm no longer able to upconvert.
    Looking forward to any feedback on this issue. Been tying all day to trouble shoot this problem.
    [Text formatting removed.  Please type your posts here, rather than pasting.]
    Message was edited by: Jim Simon

    And now with CC June 2014 you can't even capture from HDV, I need to go back to Premiere CC 2013 for that....Adobe might think tape capture is over... but it isn't totally yet...

  • Help!  Batch Capture Changes My Logged Clips' Media Start & Media End

    I'd be very grateful for any help on this.
    I log a tape with about 40 clips ranging from 30 seconds to 4 minutes. I select the clips and start a batch capture. Everything appears to be capturing normally and I receive no error messages or dropped frame warnings - after my last clip is captured I get a "Successfully Captured" message.
    However, as soon as I click "Finished," all of my clip media start's, media end's, and durations in the log window arbitrarily change to weird times. All my media start points are 26 frames too early (I've tripple-checked that "Add Handles" is indeed deactivated), and the media end points make no sense at all.
    A clip that was once 44 seconds long is now only 12 seconds long, the media end point moved a whopping 34:03 too early. Another clip will become 2 seconds longer, the media start point still shifted back 26 frames, but with the media end now 31 frames too late. Checking the original files on my drive confirms that only these weird, unusable segments are what has been captured.
    What complicates things is that I just discovered today that if I capture locally to my internal hard disk, the clips capture normally (the times remain unchanged). But if I set my capture scratch to my external hard drive (a LaCie F800 2-TB RAID-5 using Firewire-800), that's when the clips start changing themselves. I ran disk utility and found no errors on the drive, and have never had a problem with it or any part of my configuration until the last month or so... the only changes to my system being the regular use of Software Update.
    On top of that, my colleague is experiencing a similar problem with batch capture changing his clip times, even though he is using a different computer (single-processor G5), a different video deck (Sony DHR-1000), and a different storage medium (Apple Xserve RAID).
    So my question is: What is happening! The only thing I can think of is that perhaps some update has a bug - but I can't find anyone with a similar problem online.
    Any help on this would be extremely appreciated! Thank you in advance for your advice.
    Dual 2.3GHz PowerPC G5 Mac OS X (10.4.4) Deck: JVC CU-VH1 / Storage: LaCie F800 2-TB RAID-5
    Dual 2.3GHz PowerPC G5 Mac OS X (10.4.4)

    Here's an update on this. Both my colleague and I have confirmed that if we capture to an internal or external drive that is not a RAID FCPro batch captures just fine.
    But, if the drive we are capturing to is a RAID (in my case a LaCie Biggest F800 and his case an Apple Xserve), then we get dropped frame reports and/or clip in's and out's changing after the batch capture is complete.
    We even tried reformatting one of the xServe's and rebuilding it as non-journaled, it didn't solve the problem.
    It seems impossible that we're the only ones to be experiencing this problem... does anybody have any help or suggestions!?

  • Batch Capture Error: Timecode Error: End of Tape Reached

    I have been having issues doing batch capture with my JVC VS30U. I logged all my clips on the fly and did the entire tape, so the OUT point of one clip is the same as the IN point of the next clip. When I attempt to batch capture it gives this error between every clip.
    I have to hit retry, sometimes more than once, in order for the deck to properly cue and FCP to start the digitize. I don't know if this is a weird pre-roll issue, or something else, but it completely defeats the purpose of a batch if I have to sit here and hit retry after each clip.
    There are no TC breaks, and obviously its not really the end of the tape. I've read where people have similar problems, but didn't find a solution. Have already trashed prefs, but to no avail. Using FCP 5.0.4 with OS 10.4.3 and said JVC deck via firewire.
    Any ideas? Thanks in advance!

    I don't know the deck but a simple test would be to move a couple of i/o points so they are not adjacent. Or test with a single, longer clip and break it up into subclips.
    Tell us what you've tried so we don't waster your time and ours with fruitless suggestions.
    Errors displayed by FCP are usually irrelevant and rarely helpful.
    bogiesan

  • HDV batch capture is making new clips...

    thanks for watching...
    i have imported batch lists into FCP with name, media start, media end, reel and log note just as the FCP manual instructs. they import fine and i have them all in their own bins.
    i batch captured a few tapes to day and i noticed that FCP is making new clips at times. for instance i'll have a clip "dogs" in the original batch list. after the batch capture there will be "dogs" and "dogs -1" the starting time code of "dogs" and the ending timecode of "dogs -1" are the original start and end of the clip. so, FCP has spit this clip in two for some reason. why is that?
    i thought it might have to do with the setting "make new clip on Start/stop" thats listed in the clip settings tab of the log/capture window. so i made sure this was unclicked and then tried another batch , also making sure to uncheck "use original clip settings" in the batch window. but, the problem still persists.
    i have 30 tapes to digitize and i'd prefer the clips matched the batch lists. any ideas i can try to solve this problem?
    take care,
    max

    Is it a new media drive?
    how is your media drive formatted? highlight the drive on the desktop and press command(apple)+i to get info...
    Where it says 'Format' it should read Mac OS Extended... does yours say FAT 32 by any chance?
    FAT32 is a different format that can be read by PCs and Macs... it can only store file sizes of 2Gb, so has the knock-on effect of causing FCP to break captures into smaller chunks.
    If your drive is FAT32 you need to re-format it using Disc Utility. When you do this, you will lose everything on that drive, so back it up if possible.
    If your drive is formatted correctly, post back with your media set-up, ie - what drives you use, how is your capture scratch configured etc.

  • FCP 5 Batch capture broken...

    I've been fighting with FCP since version 1, so I know it's not a simple case of bad prefs or something, this is a real debilitating problem... HELP!!
    I'm using a Kona LS and a rented A500 Digi Beta deck and I just upgraded to FCP 5 and now batch capture no longer works. It started out with drop frame messages while trying to capture 8bit to DVCpro50. last week with fcp 4.5 I was capturing 10 bit uncopressed on the same set up. the only thing i've changed is the recommended system updates (security, etc) before upgrading to 5.02. I'm capturing to a series of g-raid 500s. AJA tech support told me to get a FW800 card, so I did and the drop frame messages went away, but then FCP started shorting the clips. what I mean is that on a 45 minute capture, it stopped 3 and a half minutes before the end and sent me back to the insert reel window with "Ready" next to the clip and the wrong, shorter time showing for the capture length. Now I've noticed that if I try to batch capture a clip the logged duration does not match the capture duration. I've tried rebooting from my backup drive with 4.5, and it has the same problem, so I think it was one of the system and or QT updates that broke things.
    I've tried the latest updates, I've tried a manual uninstall and re install, i've tried going back to an older version of QT, I've tried qoing back to FCP 4.5 but nothing works.
    Any one come accross this yet?

    Have you tried resetting your fcp preferences?  You're going to have to do some digging to find out how to reset them as it's been years since many of us have worked in fcp5.1  Someone may pipe up, but if not, do some searching here and google.

  • Batch Capture - Ingesting Footage of a Public Hearing

    I have a unique video verité project and I'm trying a unique approach to the Log and Capture process for it, and I'm asking for a little advice...
    On Thursday, I was recruited to record a nearly-five-hours-long public meeting at which over 150 people spoke. (1,200 in attendance) Fortunately, the meeting had a pro-grade P.A. system, and the hosts offered a box to plug in for audio pick ups on the P.A., so I used my wireless mic system to feed the speakers' voices directly into my new Canon Vixia HV 40 camcorder; I recorded the whole thing in HDV onto 5 tapes. The audio was clear as a bell. This project has a vaguely C-SPAN feel to it.
    Now comes the challenge. This was a non-stop, live-on-tape meeting. The only time I stopped was the switch to newer cassettes. The organization I am helping asked me to find a way to ingest this footage as quickly as possible, figure out how to get it onto regular DVD media, and ship it out to a couple of volunteer organizations so that people can digest the proceedings and get organized for future plans. There is no time for frills or FX or anything but a plain brown wrapper on these DVDs.
    I switched my HV 40 over to output down-converted DV streams. I started up Final Cut Pro 7 (I previously used FCP 4.5 on other projects) and got the log-and-capture process going. One thing I noticed during the Log and Capture process on the first tape:
    I decided to Log the video using the Batch Capture process. All five 60 minute tapes have been thoroughly logged now. I wanted to use Batch Capture so that it would be easier to isolate individual speakers by clip if necessary; I logged consecutive back-to-back clips of four speakers apiece on each of the tapes, each tape is logged to a different logging bin for better organization. (The logged clips are each typically 8 minutes duration.) I intend to make sequences in Final Cut, each sequence will be a different DVD disc (Disc 1 of 3, for example) and I will insert the clips consecutively into the Timeline to form a complete show.
    During the Logging process, I noticed something odd: doing everything on the fly, one clip will end on a specific frame and the next logged clip will begin on the very same frame as the previous clip ended. Shouldn't consecutively logged-on-the-fly clips with an end point followed by the beginning of the next clip on the next frame afterwards? Should I adjust the clip frame-times in the Browser by offsetting them by one frame to make them flow properly?
    Thanks in advance,
    --WA
    [NOTE: 5 tapes used, 5 logging bins logged, meeting was just over 4.5 hours in length.]

    Since saving time is essential in this case, I would have logged each tape as one clip, captured that tape and move on to the next. Drop two full clips in one Sequence for DVD 1, play out the Timeline to a stand-alone DVD recorder in real time, and move on to the next one.
    Once they had their 'no frills' DVDs, you could then go back and make subclips of each speaker if needed.
    -DH

  • Batch Capture : Timecode Error?

    So I am attempting to capture my first video onto FCP from my Canon XL. I have about 5 minutes of video and I have logged the info for each clip. They are all in my "Bin 1" and it is set as a "logging bin." The first logged clip that i want it to capture i have marked the "In Point" at 00:00:00;00 and the "Out Point" at around 00:01:09;24. The rest of my 11 clips just go in order (i.e. 2nd clip: In = 00:01:09;25 etc...). After doing all of this I click on "Batch" under the "Capture" option, a big black screen pops up over my FCP with the capture info underneath the black screen in a gray strip. My camera then rewinds to the beginning and STOPS. I then have to sit and wait for anythin to happen, my camera still saying "STOP," and then a message pops up reading the following:
    Batch Capture: Timecode Error: Unable to locate the specified timecode. You may have specified a timecode with insufficient room for a pre/post roll operation.
    I have no idea what this means and I am beginning to get impatient with capturing my video. In the Log and Capture window, the tab that says Logging, i did not mess with the "Markers." I don't know if this matters.
    Any help would be GREATLY appreciated so that I can start editing my project with this wonderful software otherwise.
    God bless,
    |-(|:^D
    `

    In standard trim, FCP needs at least 5 seconds preroll before capturing. The preroll is so the tape can get up to speed, the heads read timecode accurately and so on. You have discovered what happens when you give it no oppertunity to sort itself out.
    The simple answer for your current situation is to set your first in point 10 seconds after the start of the time code. Be sure to make sure your last clip's OUT point is 10 seconds or more before the end of time code or you can have problems at that end of the capture as well.
    The long term answer is next time let the camera run for a minute or two before you start recording anything you will want to keep. The same is true for the end of the tape - let it run for another half minute or so.
    Cheers,
    x

Maybe you are looking for