"Battery serial does not validate", but the number is within the range

My sister came home from abroad for Christmas, and I checked her PB 12-inch battery serial number. Her battery has the serial number ZZ3480FJPVEA as far as I can see. This falls into the replacement range:
12-inch
iBook G4 A1061 ZZ338 - ZZ427.
On the exchange page, Apple writes: "If the first 5 digits of your battery’s 12-digit serial number fall within the noted ranges, please order a replacement battery immediately." But the battery serial does not validate even if I replace the zero with the letter "O".
Are there batteries within the range that still are ok?
Ingmar
PowerBook G4 12-inch Mac OS X (10.4.8)

I could not post an answer to the topic without marking the question
"answered", though it wasn't!
Strange, because the question is not marked as answered and it is not necessary to mark it in order to reply (simply click on the "reply" link near each post you want to reply to).
However when you feel that your question is answered - or the forum cannot be of further assistance - mark the question as answered and maybe also give some final notes.
If you got helpful replies, then you may award the posters by granting points. You can do so by clicking to "helpful" and "solved" buttons appearing near each post (you need to be logged in).
The buttons mean what they state: "Helpful" in the sense of user gave a useful answer or further information allowing you to solve an issue with some work of your own. "Solved" means that this post of the user is mainly responsible for managing an issue.
You can only mark one posting as "solved" in a thread, and - I hope this is correct - two or three times marking posts as "helpful". With the last, I'm not sure, you may have a look at "Help & Terms of Use".

Similar Messages

My wake-up/sleep button does not work, but the serial is out from Apple list to repair. What i do now?

The wake-up/ sleep iPhone 5 botton does not work, but the serial number is out of list to recall from Apple. The problem is so similar the described in the article in the site. I want to repair in the program, like other iPhones, how it is possible?
Thanks.

Then there isn't anything you can do about it then. Your only choice is to pay to have the device fixed or replaced. Apple is in charge of that, and as I said in the other thread, this is not Apple you are talking to, we are users like you and cannot do anything about that.

NB550D - battery icon does not always reflect the proper balance of time

I have just recently purchased an NB550D and I must say that at the outset I am very happy with it. It does tend to be a bit slow but I can live with that.
My problem however is that the battery icon does not always reflect the proper balance of time. For instance after a full charge it may show 9 hours remaining but after a shutdown and restart it will may show 75% and 3 hours remaining. If I shut down and restart it may show 75% and 6 hours remaining
When I first started the unit I allowed it to fully discharge (through use) three times as was suggested by the salesman at the store but quite candidly it doesn't seem to have made one scrap of difference!
Any advice will be appreciated.
Regards

Remaining time is not credible value of the battery state - it depends on actual duty of processor and the program wich estimates this sometimes shows wrong that time or corrects this after a while. Percentage of charge of battery is much better factor to use!
But in case your battery loses from 95% to 75% after restart indictates that's something wrong with the battery or program... In my NB550D after restart (pause for 1 day) the battery loses only 2-3% .

Digital signature does not validate with the given key

We are switching our single-signon provider from openssl to Weblogic's SAML. I am trying to create a test application that will send mock SAML assertions to our test Weblogic SAML server before we begin integration with the client that will send real SAML assertions.
I have configured a Weblogic 10.3.5 instance to be a SAML Service Provider as well as created an application that creates test SAML assertions to post to the SAML server. I'm currently using a self-signed certificate to sign the SAML assertion. I've imported the self-signed cert into both the DemoIdentiy.jks and cacerts on the Weblogic SAML server.
The Weblogic SAML server is giving the following error when trying to validate the signature of the assertion:
<SAML2Assert: Start verify assertion signature>
<SAML2Assert: The assertion is signed.>
<SAML2Assert: Digital signature does not validate with the given key
org.opensaml.xml.validation.ValidationException: Digital signature does not validate with the given key
at org.opensaml.xml.signature.SignatureValidator.validate(SignatureValidator.java:68)
at com.bea.security.saml2.util.SAML2Utils.verifySamlObjectSignature(SAML2Utils.java:229)
at com.bea.security.saml2.providers.SAML2Assert.verifySignature(SAML2Assert.java:285)
>
I get this error when the SAML assertion includes both the cert and the public key, just the cert, just the public key or neither.
I'm pretty sure I've configured the SAML instance correctly since I followed the steps provided by another group who got this working with a different client. The only difference is they are using a real signed certificate (Verisign i believe) instead of a self signed cert.
I'm looking for any help to track down which step in the process I've missed or implemented incorrectly.
Thanks!
Edited by: 911967 on Feb 6, 2012 12:26 PM

So I found my own answer to the issue. The error was being caused by an the following xml in the assertion:
<ds:Reference URI="">
The value of URI attribute must have a '#' followed by the same value of the ID attribute in the parent 'Assertion' element (in our case a random string):
<saml:Assertion xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion" ID="a5k42vnhsywezqzyufq15c4bb9xuzeozrmbppj38xe" IssueInstant="2012-03-12T14:33:25.986Z" Version="2.0">
<saml:Issuer>ISSUER_NAME</saml:Issuer>
<ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
<ds:SignedInfo>
<ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/>
<ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1"/>
*<ds:Reference URI="#a5k42vnhsywezqzyufq15c4bb9xuzeozrmbppj38xe">*
How this is related to the digital signature is beyond me, though I admit I'm very new to saml and digital signing. However I spent a great deal of time investigating my certs and how I was creating the signature, which it seems is unrelated to the actual issue. I also wasn't able to find any docs specifying that this attribute was required, though I might have just missed it.

I want to buy a Beats Remotetalk replacement cable. I am in Australia and Apple Aus store does not them but the US store does - but doesn't ship to Aus. I can no longer buy from Beats as it redirects to Apple. How do I buy an authentic replacement?

I am in Australia and I want to buy a replacement RemoteTalk cable for my Beats headphones.
previously I could buy these from the Beats store and have them shipped to Australia. Now I can only buy them from the Apple Store.
However, they are only stocked on the Apple US store and not on the Apple Aus store.
The Apple US store does not ship to Australia.
So how do I get an authentic replacement cable?

Try amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Bea ts+RemoteTalk+Cable

DPG4 does not post -- but the power button lights up

I'm totally lost at this point... My old PowerMac no longer powers on. I managed to somehow get it to boot when I had this problem once before, but this time I'm getting nowhere. When I press the power button, the button itself still lights up -- but that's as far as it gets; as soon as I take my thumb off of the button, it goes dark, and the system doesn't even try to boot. The steps I've taken so far to troubleshoot this are: removed all third party components, (including a 512MB DIMM, a USB2 PCI card, and a 54g wireless PCI card, as well as several USB devices) removed the power cord and backup battery and pressed the PMU reset button. Does anyone have any other suggestions?
Fortunately, this is no longer my primary system -- a white 24" Intel-based iMac takes that title now -- but it would be awfully nice to be able to install one of my Leopard licenses (from the family pack) on the old G4 to use it as my Time Machine server.

Thanks for the suggestions so far.
Additional information: I just successfully booted the machine, through a series of (what I would call) almost random configuration adjustments. Here's what I did... I opened the box, yanked the backup battery and pressed the reset button again, and tried to power it on. I then noticed that the optical drive was connected to the ata33 interface. Thinking that this is a bit odd, I swapped it to the ata66 interface. (My two internal harddrives are both connected to the separate ata100 interface... is this a truly bizarre set of interfaces, or is it just me?) I then pressed the power button -- and the machine fans started blowing, and then stopped. Suddenly very interested, I promptly disconnected the power cable from the optical drive, and then tried again -- no dice. I pressed the power button a few times just to see what would happen, and I observed the fans on the rear of the power supply and one case fan were spinning up for just a bare moment about every few times I pressed the button. I then disconnected the main power interface cable from the motherboard, and did the whole pmu reset/battery out/pmu reset/battery back in series, and then replaced the power interface and pressed the power button. Voila! It powered up, so I promptly logged into the site and started typing.
Now, here's my thoughts: I would assume that the fact that it is presently booted up and running (albeit without the optical drive) rules out a failure of the front interface; do either of you concur? Also: I have not yet taken my multi-meter to the power supply, but my first instinct is to think that the power supply is just on the edge of my current wattage requirements, and disconnecting the power from the optical drive is what allowed me to boot. Correspondingly, I would speculate that this could be caused by either 1) my add-ons have exceeded the 400 watt output of the power supply, or 2) the power supply is indeed starting to fail.
So... since the machine is running at the moment, are there any diagnostic programs I could run against the power supply to find out if it's operating at design specifications? I'd expect this would be more accurate and more safe then me poking around with a multi-meter -- and it would be less expensive then a trip to a Mac repair shop, though that is certainly the next step if the power supply is dying.
Thanks again for your advice!

How come when i logg in to facebook it will load, but when i go into games like farmville it does not load, but the games will load with internet explorer?

i play games on face book, like farmville, frontierville, it will load the main page that shows all your friends and things that have been posted, but when i click on farmville to actually go into my farm it will not load, it says if it don't load in 10 seconds, update your player, i have tried that and it still don't load..... but i can go out of firefox and use internet explorer and the games will load... can you help me fix this, i use fire fox foe school work in college and would like to use it playing games as well.

Try using the Facebook app instead of Safari for viewing Facebook content.

Task.toXML() creates xml that does not validate against WorklistTask.xsd

I am using the worklist API and I am using the toXML() function provided in the Task object to serialize my Task info to XML. It produces XML that looks alot like a "task" Element. But, it does not validate against the WorkflowTask.xsd schema. What is even more odd is that XML looks different than the xml I see when I look at the data in the BPEL Console.
For example, the first XML document below is from Task.toXML. notice that it's first child element is taskId. According to the xsd, that is not valid. The second xml document in this post is from the console. it appears to be valid.
Am I doing something wrong or should I just not expect the worklist api to produce valid xml? (correction: should I not expect the worklist api to xml that validates?)
<task xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/taskservice/task"><taskId>0D7B97F1B138EE21E04017AC2B194357</taskId><title>Payment not posted by payee</title><isGroup>true</isGroup><acquiredBy/><owner>bpeladmin</owner><conclusion/><state>ASSIGNED</state><subState>ASSIGNED</subState><processId>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processId><processName>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processName><versionNumber>1</versionNumber><notm>1</notm><taskGroupId/><taskType>http://blade-11.payveris.com:9700/orabpel/default/ResearchRequestWorkflow/1.0/taskConfigResearchRequest.xml</taskType><identificationKey>PAULA MERRILL, 2069</identificationKey><priority>3</priority><creator>bpeladmin</creator><creationDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.000-05:00</creationDate><updatedBy>bpeladmin</updatedBy><modifyDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.000-05:00</modifyDate><flexString1>1140724383057</flexString1><flexString2>PAULA MERRILL</flexString2><flexString3>PAULA MERRILL</flexString3><flexString4>PaymentId3489</flexString4><flexLong1>0</flexLong1><flexLong2>0</flexLong2><flexDouble1>0.0</flexDouble1><flexDouble2>0.0</flexDouble2><processVersion>1.0</processVersion><instanceId>2304</instanceId><domainId>default</domainId><approvers/><hasSubTasks>false</hasSubTasks><processOwner>bpeladmin</processOwner><pattern>SINGLE_APPROVAL</pattern><taskNumber>10240</taskNumber><systemString1/><systemString2/><systemString3/><versionReason>Task Created</versionReason><assigneeGroups>ResearchManager</assigneeGroups><payload confirmation_number="1140724383057" due_date="2006-02-22-05:00" reason="Payment not posted by payee"><requester xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema"><first>PAULA MERRILL</first><last>PAULA MERRILL</last><tax_id/></requester><payment_type xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema" number="">insuranceauto</payment_type><record_info xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema"><creation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00"/><updation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00"/></record_info><payment xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema" id="3489"><bank_info bank_id="2" funds_model="RISK"/><payment_info><confirmation_number>5428</confirmation_number><amount formattedValue="77.00" value="77"/><payment_date>2006-01-06-05:00</payment_date><check_number>5851</check_number><funded>false</funded><merged>false</merged><network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C">MOORE</network><alert_on_completion>false</alert_on_completion><alert_number_days_before>0</alert_number_days_before><scheduled_info id="2278"><scheduled_for_date formatted="01/06/2006">2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_for_date><scheduled_on_date formatted="01/06/2006">2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_on_date><created_user_id>282950</created_user_id><updated_user_id>0</updated_user_id></scheduled_info></payment_info><payee_info id="24958" relationship_id="6004"><payee_account_number>JUNIT123</payee_account_number><nick_name>blahblah</nick_name><name>complexpayeenameforatest</name><address1>123 main street</address1><address2>c/o anybody</address2><city>Dark Cityrandomizer</city><state>CT</state><zip>06512</zip><network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C">MOORE</network></payee_info><customer_info id="2069"><name>PAULA MERRILL</name><customer_account_id>8</customer_account_id><customer_account_number>213</customer_account_number><customer_routing_number>111111111</customer_routing_number><address1>Ernest Hemingway Drive</address1><city>Springfield</city><state>IL</state><zip>62703</zip></customer_info><state_info><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2">Cleared</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number></state_info><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>0</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="6">Created</state><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="6">Created</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:35-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="22">Waiting for Decision</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:36-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="12">Ready for Funding</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="9">Funded</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="12">Ready for Funding</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:03-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="9">Funded</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:56-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Mailed" id="11">Payment Sent</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:59-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2">Cleared</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00"/><updation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00"/></record_info><research_request>false</research_request></payment></payload></task>
When Im look at the same task in the BPELConsole, the task looks like:
<task>
<title>Payment not posted by payee</title>
<assigneeUsers/>
<assigneeGroups>ResearchManager</assigneeGroups>
<acquiredBy/>
<owner>bpeladmin</owner>
<payload confirmation_number="1140724383057" due_date="2006-02-22-05:00" reason="Payment not posted by payee" >
<requester>
<first>PAULA MERRILL</first>
<last>PAULA MERRILL</last>
<tax_id/>
</requester>
<payment_type number="" >insuranceauto</payment_type>
<record_info>
<creation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00" />
<updation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00" />
</record_info>
<payment id="3489" >
<bank_info bank_id="2" funds_model="RISK" />
<payment_info>
<confirmation_number>5428</confirmation_number>
<amount formattedValue="77.00" value="77" />
<payment_date>2006-01-06-05:00</payment_date>
<check_number>5851</check_number>
<funded>false</funded>
<merged>false</merged>
<network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C" >MOORE</network>
<alert_on_completion>false</alert_on_completion>
<alert_number_days_before>0</alert_number_days_before>
<scheduled_info id="2278" >
<scheduled_for_date formatted="01/06/2006" >2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_for_date>
<scheduled_on_date formatted="01/06/2006" >2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_on_date>
<created_user_id>282950</created_user_id>
<updated_user_id>0</updated_user_id>
</scheduled_info>
</payment_info>
<payee_info id="24958" relationship_id="6004" >
<payee_account_number>JUNIT123</payee_account_number>
<nick_name>blahblah</nick_name>
<name>complexpayeenameforatest</name>
<address1>123 main street</address1>
<address2>c/o anybody</address2>
<city>Dark Cityrandomizer</city>
<state>CT</state>
<zip>06512</zip>
<network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C" >MOORE</network>
</payee_info>
<customer_info id="2069" >
<name>PAULA MERRILL</name>
<customer_account_id>8</customer_account_id>
<customer_account_number>213</customer_account_number>
<customer_routing_number>111111111</customer_routing_number>
<address1>Ernest Hemingway Drive</address1>
<city>Springfield</city>
<state>IL</state>
<zip>62703</zip>
</customer_info>
<state_info>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2" >Cleared</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
</state_info>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>0</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="6" >Created</state>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="6" >Created</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:35-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="22" >Waiting for Decision</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:36-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="12" >Ready for Funding</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="9" >Funded</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="12" >Ready for Funding</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:03-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="9" >Funded</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:56-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Mailed" id="11" >Payment Sent</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:59-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2" >Cleared</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00" />
<updation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00" />
</record_info>
<research_request>false</research_request>
</payment>
</payload>
<conclusion/>
<state>ASSIGNED</state>
<subState>ASSIGNED</subState>
<processId>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processId>
<processName>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processName>
<processVersion>1.0</processVersion>
<instanceId>2304</instanceId>
<domainId>default</domainId>
<processOwner>bpeladmin</processOwner>
<taskId>0D7B97F1B138EE21E04017AC2B194357</taskId>
<versionReason>Task Created</versionReason>
<taskGroupId/>
<taskType>http://blade-11.payveris.com:9700/orabpel/default/ResearchRequestWorkflow/1.0/taskConfigResearchRequest.xml</taskType>
<identificationKey>PAULA MERRILL, 2069</identificationKey>
<comments/>
<priority>3</priority>
<creator>bpeladmin</creator>
<updatedBy>bpeladmin</updatedBy>
<hasSubTasks>false</hasSubTasks>
<approvers/>
<pattern>SINGLE_APPROVAL</pattern>
<flexString1>1140724383057</flexString1>
<flexString2>PAULA MERRILL</flexString2>
<flexString3>PAULA MERRILL</flexString3>
<flexString4>PaymentId3489</flexString4>
<flexDouble1/>
<flexDouble2/>
<flexLong1/>
<flexLong2/>
<flexDate1/>
<flexDate2/>
<flexDate3/>
<attachment/>
<taskNumber>10240</taskNumber>
<creationDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.955-05:00</creationDate>
<modifyDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.955-05:00</modifyDate>
<isGroup>true</isGroup>
<versionNumber>1</versionNumber>
<notm>1</notm>
<expirationDate/>
<expirationDuration/>
</task>
Message was edited by:
gjacobi

I am using oracle.tip.pc.services.hw.task.impl.Task
that object has a toXML method.
To get that object, I am using the RemoteWorklistServiceClient.getWorlistTaskById method.
A word of caution. Not only am I still having the issue above (I had to hack my own WorkflowTask.xsd to make it validate) but I have noticed that the toXML() method actually returns different results when you think it would not. For example, I have something similar to the following code:
task.toXML()
task.toElement()
task.getPayload()
task.toXML()
The first and last toXML methods produce strings that do not match (it adds some empty elements to the end of the document). Weird. Very Weird.
Greg

Validation "is a valid date" does not pass but Apex proceeding anyway

Hi,
I have a simple date-item which I validate first against "not null", then for "is a valid date", then that the date is not in the future.
In debug mode the first validation passes, the second ( is a valid date ) does not pass, but the validation process proceeds anyway...!? Then the third validation "date not in the future" produces ad DB-Error because it is not a valid date.
Why does the validation proceed even if the validation does not pass...?
Version 2.2.0
Juergen

Juergen,
"In debug mode the first validation passes, the second ( is a valid date ) does not pass, but the validation process proceeds anyway...!?"
Do you mean that the third validation is firing even though the second is failing? This behaviour is correct. All validations fire (regardless of any having already failed) unless they have specific conditions set on them to make them act differently.
If you don't want the third validation to fire if the second has failed then you will need to put a condition on the 3rd validation to prevent this. Alternatively you could bundle all you validations into one of type "PL/SQL returning Error Text" then have some IF...THEN...ELSE logic in your PL/SQL to return the relevant validatoin text depending on what the problem is (i.e. Date is null, date is invalid or date is in the future).
Andy

Installed Photoshop Elements 13. Upon activation, get through sign in screen, but when doing serial number validation, validate goes round but does not validate. Connect Later is only way out of screen. How do I validate. Checked account but product n

How do one validate Photoshop 13. (Windows 8) Upon activation, get through to sign in screen, but when doing serial number validation, validate goes round but does not validate. Connect Later is only way out of screen. Checked account but product not listed. Installed with serial number that was sent by Adobe. Have attempted numerous times at different times of the day. On-line connection working.

Have you bothered to do any research at all? Not every app was upgrade to 5.5. Those that weren’t will next be upgraded to CS6.
Bob

I had an iphone 4s and it worked nice with facetime and imessage using my phone number but it was stolen on December so I buy a new iphone 4s using the same cellphone number but now imessage and facetime does not work with my number, it only works with

I had an iphone 4s and it worked nice with facetime and imessage using my phone number but it was stolen on December so I buy a new iphone 4s using the same cellphone number but now imessage and facetime does not work with my number, it only works with my apple ID. Please Help me I speak Spanish so if my English is not ok I´m sorry about it.
Do you think that apple has to reset in their database of the old serial number attached with my phone number and that’s why I can´t activate imessage and facetime with my number in the new iphone 4s??

I understand all of this Meg; that is why I bought an Iphone; but never expected my phone not even give a at least a 24 or even 12 hours....I work 12 hour shifts and also would expect to have to charge each night but not twice a day or more. I am not always somewhere I can charge my phone.
Your points are true; however it doesn't help me......

Setup.exe gives a "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number"

I ran the Adobe Customization Wizard XI to create a transform file and now when run setup.exe it always come with the error "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number".
It does the same thing when using msi with the command : msiexec /i AcroPro.msi TRANSFORMS=AcroPro.mst /qb!
Here is my setup.ini file
[Startup]
RequireOS=Windows XP
RequireMSI=3.1
RequireIE=7.0.0000.0
Require64BitVC10RT=1
CmdLine=/spb /rs /sl"1036"
[Product]
msi=AcroPro.msi
vcrtMsi=vc_red.msi
vcrtDir=VC10RT_x64
Languages=1033;1036
2052=Chinese Simplified
1028=Chinese Traditional
1029=Czech
1030=Danish
1043=Dutch (Netherlands)
1033=English (United States)
1035=Finnish
1036=French (France)
1031=German (Germany)
1038=Hungarian
1040=Italian (Italy)
1041=Japanese
1042=Korean
1044=Norwegian (Bokmal)
1045=Polish
1046=Portuguese (Brazil)
1049=Russian
1051=Slovak
1060=Slovenian
1034=Spanish (Traditional Sort)
1053=Swedish
1055=Turkish
1058=Ukrainian
1025=English with Arabic support
1037=English with Hebrew support
6156=French (Morocco)
CmdLine=TRANSFORMS="AcroPro.mst"
[Windows XP]
PlatformID=2
MajorVersion=5
MinorVersion=1
ServicePackMajor=3
[MSI Updater]
Path=WindowsInstaller-KB893803-v2-x86.exe
I don't know what goes wrong as took my serial number on my profile from the adobe web site, same thing for the download of the software.
Does it means that the serial number provided was invalid for deploying ?
NB.: My goal is to deploy our Acrobat XI through SCCM in silent mode and I don't know if there is extra consideration for that. For now it's only not working at the command line.
Another important point is that the install works great without customization ! If I just run the setup.exe from freshly extracted files and I use my serial number, everything is working fine.
So what goes wrong ?

Thanks for the reply brogers_1 and Vinod Dbhal, you gave good hint.
I retried installing the initial package in French on a Windows 7 English and the software installed properly in French.
As I used to work with virtuals for those tests, I rolled back my virtual and redo my test installation with chosing to install it in English on my Windows 7 English and again the installation finished properly but I was surprised when I realized that even if I chose English as language, the software was running in French !
Of course I can change the language settings (in the edit-preferences-language) to follow the operating system witch is nice.
That gave me the cue I needed to know. I started from scratch my customization with choosing only the French language in the "Application Languages" and I left the MUI Languages blank and saved the .mst
I ran again the same command : msiexec /i AcroPro.msi TRANSFORMS=AcroPro.mst /qb!
And everything works fine.
NB.: As I used the .msi directly, of course I had to install the prerequirement Visual C++ 2010 first. Otherwise the installation failed without any error message.
Thanks again to you for your good hint,
Bob

I need to get into contact with Adobe support on renewal of my CC subscription which does not work but I cannot find any PHONE number just the referral to this forum - help, what should I do?? Thanks!!

I need to get into contact with Adobe support on renewal of my CC subscription which does not work but I cannot find any PHONE number just the referral to this forum - help, what should I do?? Thanks!!

Use the web chat:
Contact Customer Care
Mylenium

I cannot unlock my phone. When I hit the number the key is highlighted but the "dot" does not show in the passcode box. Have shut it off and restarted nothing. Held on/off and "square" key to reset but still nothing. Any ideas on how to resolve this issue

I cannot unlock my phone. When I hit the number the key is highlighted but the "dot" does not show in the passcode box. Have shut it off and restarted nothing. Held on/off and "square" key to reset but still nothing. Any ideas on how to resolve this issue

Connect to iTunes and try to reset it from there.

SCCM issue - "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number"

I have a problem with the error "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number" recurring.
I am trying to install Acrobat XI Std silently by SCCM.
I've used the Adobe Customisation Wizard to create a mst which include the volume serial number we have with our licence purchases. Note that I am in Australia. I use the command line in SCCM for the install as "msiexec /i "AcroStan.msi" TRANSFORMS="D&B_AcroStd.mst" /qn" which fails silently. If I install on a local machine using an admin command prompt and changing to /qb at the end, I get the aforementioned error.
I have a few things to try and resolve, having searched the adobe forums and other forums for the solution. The mst is only trying to install US English & I have even gone so far as to use the direct editor in the customisation wizard and change some values in the property table to resolve this. In the property table I can confirm that LANG_SEL_DEFAULT = ENU, REGIONAL_LIST = ENU, LANG_LIST = en_US, ProductLanguage = 1033
Is there a way to check the language specified for ym serial number?
Bryndon

Update on a couple of details:
@Sabian,
Thanks for the location, I've downloaded and then when I tried an install of the newly extracted msi (admittedly on the same computer) I got exactly the same issue. Of note though is that running /qf automatically brought up the same serial number and the same incorrectly spelled company name. Installing on another computer (freshly imaged) doesn't have those inputs already present under /qf. Next when I try using the transfrom (a new one) with /qr it gives an error of the serial number, displaying the entire serial.
@Sebastian
I've had a look through yours and it seems our issues could have the same origin. Looks like I may have to call customer support regarding the serial number as Sabian suggested in your thread.
The bit that gets me is when the same serial number is used in a manual install (or /qf) then it installs ok without any errors.

"Battery serial does not validate", but the number is within the range

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for